Ok, looks ok at first glance, getting photon emission from *something* and it appears to be the right colour for H. I would ask a few questions if you dont mind.
1: I assume you are using deuterium as your fuel?
2 How much vaccume are you running at?
3: Have you calculated your dose (are are UNSHIELDED in the video). Get a neutron counter, this would also validate the presence of fusion.
4: whats the voltage on your electron pump/PSU for the plasma lamp?
@tasilbhurn Hi are you thinking that the hydrogen protons at turning to neutrons, because without neutrons one couldn't fuse protons and electrons to create helium i wouldn't think?
@ProjectsBlack You cant fuse electrons with anything. you strip electrons to expose the protons, which you then cause to collide, these then pick up new electrons when you allow them to reform, thus creating your He. Electrons can not touch the nucleus, eg. a neutron star is so heavy because its made of all neutrons, no electrons to stimulate the strong force which keeps E1 and N1 apart allowing tighter stacking and a super-massive(high mass not large) substance.
@tasilbhurn Sorry my mistake, i didn't explain myself correctly, we strip electrons to expose the protons in an atomic system, but in a system with only protons and electrons like 1H there are no neutrons to create the helium which needs neutrons the last time i looked?
@tasilbhurn Is there a way one could test for lithium in this experiment do you think? if electrons are being stripped away here, the reformation if its occurring may not only be creating Helium but others.
No researcher ever bothered about comments and critics, simplly because we know what we saw and we use the usefull so it is working for us, others should build it on their own or at last localy :)
Charge clusters atracte positive ions and can be accelerated gaining enough energy to transmute all atomic materials, Charge clusters technology is patented by Kenneth SHOULDERS, Electrum Validum. Dense plasma fusion and focus fusion, four wave mixing, electromagnetic spin.
LOL @ The day somebody, against all odds, creates a fusion reaction in such a stable environment. This guy was clearly prepared for an exponential, thermonuclear output.
The few homemade Farnsworth-Hirsch Fusors that actually work properly are done in a proper containment vessel. Now you can get a suspended hydrogen plasma but if it's functioning and you up to deuterium you will get neutron radiation. The only exception is if He-3 is fused then you get a high energy alpha particle released per reaction instead. Almost non-existent on the earth and expensive to synthesize. Maybe you went to the moon and got some ^_^ bring me along next time LOL
You cant fuse hydrogen and create helium without releasing neutrons. Buy a BTI Bubble neutron detector and show the world some REAL proof of your claim.
@silverag477 True, but when two hydrogen atoms combine, its creates Deuterium. That creation releases energy in the form of an anti-electron and a neutrino. As a result, one of those protons becomes a neutron. The process continues with the fusion of Deuterium to create helium with the release of a neutron.
@clagwell oh ok. wait what if you had a secondary vaccuum chamber connected to the first one and closed off by a valve of somekind with just ordinary non radioactive hydrogen to absorb the rest of the stray neutrons? (or better yet, have the secondary chamber encase the first one to avoid risk of any leaks) idk what would you suggest that he could add to this?
@clagwell Hi, wouldn't you think the helium would better decay down into hydrogen rather than the other way round? And creating helium from hydrogen would require the ability to recreate neutrons, in order for the protons and with the electron compliment in the hydrogen to fuse to them in order to create nucleons of helium. Is this experiment real?
What looked as a mad scientist actually turned out to be a old guy living with his mum and frying vacuum tubes with a high power RF transmitter. Is your tinkering FCC approved?
@MrFreddyFeatures But so you will know, with fusion or fission you gain energy, but you already know that right, you are just making fun out of people who share with all that is in your funy way :)
if you have trouble understanding my prior comment, then think about how bit-errors work in computer topics - even a change of one bit from a 0 to 1 or a 1 to a 0 or just a loss of one bit, can render an entire file unreadable, a whole program to not run correctly.
it's the same with DNA.
nuclear material isn't safe at all, it's bio-toxic.
or leukemia etc (like the high incidence of that in places with nuclear, like Sellafield),
that's why nuke power is so deranged - the length of time it stays exceptionally bio-toxic (look at the insane types of facilities they build to contain spent 'fuel') plus the fact the particles leak out.
if enough radioactive particles hit your DNA, then it changes it and every time it unzips itself to rebuild your body, which it is doing all the time, it can't read the DNA anymore so it makes cancers.
why is it everyone looks at stuff like this with such a closed mind yes it may not do what is says it does but there are people trying different ideas to try to make the world better for the rest of us at least entertain themselves with a hobby
Dear Retarded Spawn of YouTube: This is not a Fusor (that's Fusor, with an S, Obitrev) it's just the usual free energy scum claiming fusion from nonsensical crack-pottery. Proton-Proton fusion is endothermic, aneutronic and takes an extremely long amount of time to fully go through all the steps to make one He4 nucleus. This particular individual was BANNED from the Amateur Fusor community ages ago. Now, go watch some Fusor videos or the dude smoking a cigarette in one puff.
Obviously you know nothing about fusion, so either shut up or get some knowledge before you talk about stuff you don't know.
As someone already stated, this kind of fuison is endothermic, it *needs* energy, so the description of the video ist not completely correct.
You probably also think that a block of Uranium, 50 cm away on your desk would be harmful to you. As long a you don't eat it, grind it, or put it directly onto your skin, the radiation won't reach you at all.
@gedankenwelten your comment on uranium is rather ignorant. A "block"? How bigger block? 5cm * 5cm? well thats probably ok, 10 * 10? probably ok, 15 * 15? ok probably not ok. 20 * 20? well there goes the neighborhood.
No, your comment ist ignorant. The critical mass of Uranium is 16,5 kg (for U 233) to 145 kg (for U 234) given the density of 19,16 g/cm³ you could form a block of 19.6*19,6*19,6 cm out of U 234 without making it explode. You could also mix other material into it. It would still be radioactive, but the critical mass would have to be much higer.
Also there is a fault in your comment: blocks of 20 * 20 do not exist. we call that a rectangle or square. It's 2 dimensional.
@gedankenwelten ok well firstly you got me on the only defining two dimensions error, damn that burnt. But seriously, uranium 234? really? coz thats a valid example.. second, cheers for pointing out he example of 233, reaching critical mass with only an 11cm diameter sphere. how bout your standard fissile uranium isotope, 235, critical diameter of 17cm. sure if its 238 your fine, but a block of uranium of an undefined size and isotope such as in your comment can kill you, even subcritical.
@Xenosys Then please tell me how a subcritical uranium block will kill you when you don't ingest any uranium? Uranium is an alpha radiator. Alpha particles are the most dangerous when ingested but the least when not ingested, because they only travel a few mm in air.
Did you know that the walls of some old buildings are covered with uranium rich paint that lets you hear a firework when you put your geiger counter close to it? Same with watches or cake plates.
@gedankenwelten how? do you know why critical mass is critical? because its the mass required for the neutron emmission to go exponential, a subcritical mass will still emit radiationincreasing radiation proportional to its density, a subcritical mass that is still close to critical mass will still emit immense quantities of radiaion, and yer alpha particles are low penetration, and the vast majority of them still wont reach you, but some will. add to that the beta emmissions -
@gedankenwelten and the fact that this near critical mass or uranium is also now also getting incredibly hot, oxidising to form radioactive, biosoluble gasses and smoke. But dw, im sure youll be fine.
It's a fact that Uranium like you find it in nature won't do any harm to you when it's in 50 cm distance on your desk. The beta radiation wont reach you through air and clothes. Also it has no critical mass.
When talking about a block of carbon, do you think I refer to highly refined radioactive carbon isotopes?
Noone ever complained about Uranium-richt Paint or cake plates because there are no records of people ever getting sick of them.
@gedankenwelten i admit defeat, i had not considered a block of mixed uranium isotopes, which is of course the most likely block of uranium you're going to find. But hey, you're at least guilty of being slightly vague. come on you've gotta give me something, we've been arguing for like 45min :P
I admitt being *slightly* vague. But in case no further information is given, one usually automatically thinks about the most common possibility.
The reason why I posted a comment like this in the first way is, that many people hear words like "Uranium" and think of it like some evil spawn of hell, not knowing that there is much efford invled to make it really dangerous.
Like when you hear "shark" and think of evil man eating creatures or "rat" and disgusting dirty critters.
I mean look at the comment I answered with my very first post here...that kind of stupidity makes me nearly angry, moslty because it's presented like the person stating it knows it for sure.
I even had a quarrel with a guy that said the Tsar bomb would unleash 5% of the sun's energy. That's so darn rediculous. Noo, the sun isn't a 330'000 times Earth mass H-bomb itself wichs explosion takes 10 billion years to finish...but the Tsar bomb is like 5% of it *sigh
I once calculated how much mass it looses due to fusion (in form of neutrinos and stuff) that was also some number...and yet (I'm also very much into astronomy) it's not much compared to what happens when a supernova goes off. Or the amount of energy that is set free when Mountains on neutron stars (typical mountain hight about a few mm!) collapse. If you could walk on a neutron star and stumble, you'd hit the surface with the energy of several H-bombs xD .
That's the Uranium metal you get out of ore. It's practically all U-238 that ist not fissile and barely radiactive compared to the other isotopes.
Now you come an tell me about Weapons grade Uranium (85% U-235). But that's a very special thing. It's altered from usual uranium by humans with much efford. So if you just talk about "Uranium" you usually would refer to the non-altered frorm, wouldn't you?
Just so that you know: I have a scientific education and during that I had many radioctive Isotopes on my desk. Most of them don't require any protection if you don't touch them with your bare hands.
Back to the Uranium: the critical mass of Uranium in any case only applies to pure isotopes. If you tace the mixture of natural Uranium coming out of the ore, you'll never get to any critical mass. If you would, every county on earth could afford their own atomic bomb.
@gedankenwelten weapons grade uranium is only 85% U-235, thats a bit more than trace amounts of impurity i'd say. oh you have a scientific education huh? then i guess you understand how one radioactive isotope is nothing like the next. you've never been anywhere near a remotely concentrated sample of a FISSILE isotope.
Man, I mean Uranium in it's natural mix, not Uranium ore, read. Extract uranium from the ore and *don't* refine it. Pure Uranium metal in it's natural isotope mix does by far not have a critical mass, nor will it radiate the hell out of you. Youll get skin cancer when you sleep with it snug tight in the night, yes. And you will die from lung cancer and many others when you engage it with an angle ginder, but you won't be harmed, when it's just standing there.
@gedankenwelten that is a valid point. i suppose it would be reasonable to assume that a block of uranium of undefined composition would be of relatively natural ratio of isotopes. Ok you win. On a completely unrelated not man you look so much like the son i would have had if my ex gf and i had one. weird, you look just like a 50/50 mix of us
Not much scientific stuff there, but youtube is definately not the right place to discuss science lol. I'm an asperger type person, mainly tinkering with with technical stuff...or grinding telescope mirrors lol.
The thing about the 50/50 mix could be coincidencence, even if I was your child. Phaenotype and genotype are not that simple too, but at least it's possible.
Stop idealising everything what I say so it fits your argumentation.
No, I have not been anywere near a fissile isotope. But that's not the question here. In my initial comment I never said a word about weapon grade Uranium or anything else than just "Uranium". And just "Uranium" is pure uranium in it's usual isotope spectrum wich is radioactive, but far from being fissile or showing any exponential neutron count when you stack it.
The Uranium need to be purified in an extreme complex and expensive machinery so you get a product that actually has a critical mass somewhere. So if you just take uranium like you find it in nature, you can even put 100 tons of it onto your desk ant theneigborhood would be save. At least from the brute force of an atomic blast. Like I said, ingesting Uranium is a different thing, so you must not grind it etc. .
I was referring to a block on your desk...I don't know your desk, but mine does not support 145 kg for a rather huge 19.6*19.6*19.6 cm cube . I was indeed thinking about somethin like 5*5*5 or 10*10*5, I'd say that also counts as a block.
@gedankenwelten ::nod:: I'd say if you could use no power, some LSD, and cause a vagina to gratify me from vast distances instantaeously.... well now I wager that would do a better service to humanity. :)
A block of uranium metal. NOT enriched uranium (I got into a discussion about that one, but enriched uranium is aldredy modified by humans - I talk about the isotope mix youll find in nature, that radioactive but can't explode).
It will make you geiger counter squeak like hell, but only at very close distance (some mm) since uranium is an alpha emitter and alpha radiation - despite it's the most ionizing one - travels not far. Same for watches and stuff.
thing about watches, if you mean the dayglo type? - those tend to be in very close proximity to the skin.
also, it isn't safe to have things that emit radiation around, it doesn't matter if the particles aren't as detectable a few mm away, they've still been released and will have travelled through the walls and out into the open air etc. all it takes is enough of those particles hitting your DNA, after a few transcripts you get cancer
There is only urianium in very old watches, more modern watches have radium. New watches actually haven't any radioactive in them. However, there are tritium gas lights, you can buy them in the trekking store. It's a bit of - tritium wich is a beta emitter - molten in a pice of glas with a fluorescent coat on the inside. The gals totall absorbs even the beta radiation, wich is less harful but longer reaching then alpha.
In old watches that do their glow with alpha emitters, the glas and for sure the metal between your skin and the glow paint is enough to absorb the faint radiation.
The tritium gas lights are even considered save when you break them. To achive a faint glow only a very small amout of radioactivity is needed. You shouldn't scrape off the glow paint, that's right.
About the dose of radioactivity: the body can repair DNA damage to a certain amount.
That means that there is treshold above that you get cancer, more or less propotional to the dose (actually sigmoidal), below that, the chance to get cancer from radiation is zero. Think of it like: the body can repair 10 DNA damages per minute. If you ret radiated for 9 then nothing will happen. if you get radiated for 11 there is a slight chance you get cancer. If you are radiated for 100 there is a great chance you get cancer.
@gedankenwelten - it's irrelevent that it can repair itself, cause that is like saying you can slash and stab people so many times and they'll be ok everntually as the blood loss isn't enough to overwhelm the coagulating and healing of the wound.
no nuclear material is safe. the particles are emitted (whatever types isn't the point, it's just that eg gamma is more difficult to contain. they all do damage and are toxic to biology).
You know, ther are bacteria that thrive on radioactivity. That about "toxic to biology". Of course that's an extreme specialty but you can't generalize like that. Radiactivity is not good for any life, but a low amount of radioactivity is everywhere and life accomodated to it. There IS a treshold, that's a fact you can read up.
Belive what you want. I explained it to you and I'm a bit educated in that matter. I won't go futher here with the discussion.
I don't even know Sellafield. I'm just an autistic nerd and scientist and a freak of nature and truth on top of that. And I hate it when peopeIe have wrong perception about things, animals or humans. I once declined a job where they said I should talk the people into bying computer stuff. So much about my honesty.
@gedankenwelten - then why ignore the greats of your country and culture then, eg Vogel, Goethe, Steiner - anyone that has a clue about science really.
it's bad enough nuke is toxic to biology and ecosystem in a purely reductionist science way - in real proper holistic science it's even more of an abomination.
sales jobs are pusher jobs really. goddam the pusher man, the pusher is not a dealer.
@gedankenwelten - if They say you're autistic then you may have been misdiagnosed, remember that 'metal illnesses' have no pathology, they can't be deteced in autopsies etc.
w w w geocities(dot)com/growingjoel/mywindow.html
read them put the 'normals' in their place. the 'normals' are completely abnormal and un-natural and they cannot explain themselves without reference to having merely gone along with things they were told to or thought they should.
No, particles are not released an sufficient amount to do damage to you when you don't scrape on uranium, uranium paint etc. . And you are wrong about the particles not being detected. A geiger counter isn't able to detect every single gamma quant, but it's anble to detect every singe beta or alpha particle. One click from the geiger means exactly one hit from one decauing atom. So yes, you can detect single atoms. If your chamber does not go 360 °
then of course you only detect the particels headed your way. Usually that means you detect every third decay.
But I get the feeling with particles you mean alpha and beta and not paint particles. In this case you are even more wrong. The particles are getting stopped by matter. The denser the matter the higher the stopping power. gold an lead are among the best stoppers. But even more important ist the size and the charge of the praticel.
See, alpha particles are the fattes ones, they carry 2 positive charges, as alpha particles are nothing else but helium nuclei. Beta particles are nothing else but electrons, so they carry one minus charge. Gamma rays are EM radiation, like x-rays just with more energy.
The ionizing (and that means the DNS damaging) potential comes from the charge they carry for the 2 first kinds of radiadion. Alpha with 2+ does much damage, beta with 1- does low damage.
The particles to damage when they hit a molecule. Their kinetic and electric energy gets absorbed by the molecule that then breaks. That means, that the Alpha and beta particels are totally absorbed during that. That's why high damaging particles do not fly as far as low damaging paricles. Damage and travel length are bound to each other, that's what I want to say with that.
Tha also counts for gamma. Gamma even penetrates 30 cm of lead or more.
But for your body it's the least dangerous. The #1 source of danger are alpha radiators, that's right. But usually only when they get vaporized or aerosolized. Of course, if you carry a block of uranium around, wich is not advisable, then it will get scraped and you'll inhale that and become sick. But if it's on your desk, 50 cm away, like in my initial comment, there is absolutely nothing to fear. I should say, that it was meant for demonstration.
I wouldn't put a block of unsealed uranium un my desk for more than a week.
On a sidenote, you can get several radioactive minerals on a mineral bazar without any special license or so. I'd keep them in some sort of decorative platic box, though. So the wind does not blow their dust ti my lungs.
Being so concerned about tiny doses of radiation, you shouldn't make long lights or go into caves/or cellars.
@JustSomePerson888 The uranium wich is naturally in the earth decays into a radioactive radon isotope that fumes out of the soil. And on a long (=high) fligth you get a dose of x-ray and gamma rays like you would in the CT (wich is a lot more than for a usual x-ray picture, I think 80 times a much). Here in germany are some cellars in a certain region where I personally wouldn't want to stay longer than 10 min. per day. I'd rather put uranium metal in my cupboard.
that's why in nature it's found way underground, where no-one should be going to do things like dig it up. cause it's not as if they need it for anything. even long-haul space travel (which is stupid for other reasons) is a poor candidate for nuke power.
i get the feeling you like to try to hide how toxic and dangerous nuclear is, by posting a lot of the scientific data on it.
Lol, now you sound like a creationist. It isn't safe and that's why it is found undergroiund? That's neiter completely true nor is it the reasony why it'S found underground. I tell you the reason: Radiactive elements are mostly elements with very big nuclei. And that means they are heavy. What do heavy thing do? They fall to the ground. When the gound is molten, like in primordial times, when earth got born, it will sink to the bottom. That's why it's underground -.- .
@gedankenwelten - telling the truth about radioactive material and nuclear energy et uses is creationism? how so? sounds like you have brain cancer etc already there.
cause there's no logical step between what i posted and what you drew from it at all.
so what if its underground from being heavy? that changes nothing as to what i wrote, that you are trying to spam out with irrelevent science on nuclear.
In space there is nothing to block the radiation from the stars (wich would be air on earth). It's x-rays and gamma, lesser alpha and beta they can be easily shilded with the vehicles hull). The sun radiates neutron too, that's not nice.
I never said that radiactivity in general is safe.
And I'm talking all science because that's how I talk. I'm a scienentist and I'm a nerd on top of that.
Now go and bother someone else with your "noone should go there" argumentation.
@gedankenwelten - oh you see that as creationism?! when it's just common sense, no need to believe in anything except that.
your dna has developed (sans tampering) to exist with an atmosphere entirely shielded from outer space.
that plus space exploration via long haul - is very stupid. humans aren't equipped for that, hence why stupid shit like cryo is considered as an option. you are insane, and i'd wager you give your greener parts of Deutschland a bad name. sell-out.
@adler3008 It's a demonstration of a Philo-Fuzor. It was meant to fuze Hydrogen into Helium, but unfortunately it was a dead end. Although, it is great for making x-rays and cancer.
So people can make nuclear fusion at home now? If anyone ever doubted the Bible for saying that God would destroy the wicked nations with fire, it's time to consider the many dangers and possibilities.
@Psychophantasmagoria we don't even have viable nuclear fusion on a massive scale, let alone at home. grow a brain and try to think before talking about your imaginary friends online.
we should bring it in front to know that the verification of emitted light could be change while interact with fequencys. (laserbeammodulation)
so the question was, " can we understand the differance of h2, he2 plasma. and could it be posible to detect diferance of the plasma while handel it" to stard a compare test with real h2, he2 plasma...
But will it blend?
7T1RT 2 days ago
The cufflinks, arcing wire and bits falling off are a nice touch.
DixonAgee 6 days ago
nice LED's -_-
Benivator2 6 days ago
Ok, looks ok at first glance, getting photon emission from *something* and it appears to be the right colour for H. I would ask a few questions if you dont mind.
1: I assume you are using deuterium as your fuel?
2 How much vaccume are you running at?
3: Have you calculated your dose (are are UNSHIELDED in the video). Get a neutron counter, this would also validate the presence of fusion.
4: whats the voltage on your electron pump/PSU for the plasma lamp?
Thanks
~Mors
tasilbhurn 1 week ago
@tasilbhurn Hi are you thinking that the hydrogen protons at turning to neutrons, because without neutrons one couldn't fuse protons and electrons to create helium i wouldn't think?
ProjectsBlack 6 hours ago
@ProjectsBlack You cant fuse electrons with anything. you strip electrons to expose the protons, which you then cause to collide, these then pick up new electrons when you allow them to reform, thus creating your He. Electrons can not touch the nucleus, eg. a neutron star is so heavy because its made of all neutrons, no electrons to stimulate the strong force which keeps E1 and N1 apart allowing tighter stacking and a super-massive(high mass not large) substance.
tasilbhurn 5 hours ago
@tasilbhurn Sorry my mistake, i didn't explain myself correctly, we strip electrons to expose the protons in an atomic system, but in a system with only protons and electrons like 1H there are no neutrons to create the helium which needs neutrons the last time i looked?
ProjectsBlack 5 hours ago
@tasilbhurn Maybe its 2H (deuterium) he is using for the neutron source,i was going off 1H. sorry too many drinks tonight...
ProjectsBlack 4 hours ago
@tasilbhurn Is there a way one could test for lithium in this experiment do you think? if electrons are being stripped away here, the reformation if its occurring may not only be creating Helium but others.
ProjectsBlack 4 hours ago
3:35 his hand suddenly dissappears, and his knee is making strange moves, I think he is fapping to his invention of some kind of discharge lamp..
6B32ify 1 week ago
boredom, mixed with an old bag of a wife = have as much sex as you can kids, cos it soon runs dry, (use a condom!
fuzzynostic 2 weeks ago
I think you built a Fluorescent light....
But thats my opinion....
memadmax69 2 weeks ago
Cockcroft–Walton generator
kekec1000000 3 weeks ago
No researcher ever bothered about comments and critics, simplly because we know what we saw and we use the usefull so it is working for us, others should build it on their own or at last localy :)
kekec1000000 3 weeks ago
Charge clusters atracte positive ions and can be accelerated gaining enough energy to transmute all atomic materials, Charge clusters technology is patented by Kenneth SHOULDERS, Electrum Validum. Dense plasma fusion and focus fusion, four wave mixing, electromagnetic spin.
kekec1000000 3 weeks ago
Please send me you bank acct number so that I can transfer my life savings into your acct. This is going to make us a fortune!
55chh 3 weeks ago
That said... I like the pretty colors, and the intriguing device. :)
halfamused 3 weeks ago
LOL @ The day somebody, against all odds, creates a fusion reaction in such a stable environment. This guy was clearly prepared for an exponential, thermonuclear output.
halfamused 3 weeks ago
1 taco please
Dracoti 4 weeks ago
you dont use a transmutation circle!!
do you use an automail right?
cholulo80 1 month ago
yeh, but can you make whiskey with it
nedladdy 1 month ago
The few homemade Farnsworth-Hirsch Fusors that actually work properly are done in a proper containment vessel. Now you can get a suspended hydrogen plasma but if it's functioning and you up to deuterium you will get neutron radiation. The only exception is if He-3 is fused then you get a high energy alpha particle released per reaction instead. Almost non-existent on the earth and expensive to synthesize. Maybe you went to the moon and got some ^_^ bring me along next time LOL
JonPinchbecking 1 month ago
this video sucks as hard as the one who posted it
ThereWasNoFreeName 1 month ago
nice video, but clagwell is right, your a hack. SHOW US THE NEUTRONS
hesmotit 1 month ago
You cant fuse hydrogen and create helium without releasing neutrons. Buy a BTI Bubble neutron detector and show the world some REAL proof of your claim.
clagwell 1 month ago 17
@clagwell hydrogen atoms don't have neutrons
silverag477 1 month ago
@silverag477 True, but when two hydrogen atoms combine, its creates Deuterium. That creation releases energy in the form of an anti-electron and a neutrino. As a result, one of those protons becomes a neutron. The process continues with the fusion of Deuterium to create helium with the release of a neutron.
Make a call to BTI and buy a detector.
clagwell 1 month ago
Comment removed
silverag477 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@clagwell oh ok. wait what if you had a secondary vaccuum chamber connected to the first one and closed off by a valve of somekind with just ordinary non radioactive hydrogen to absorb the rest of the stray neutrons? (or better yet, have the secondary chamber encase the first one to avoid risk of any leaks) idk what would you suggest that he could add to this?
silverag477 1 month ago
@silverag477 One proton becomes a neutron.
vishva8kumara 1 month ago
Comment removed
serj88 1 month ago
@clagwell I haven't been able to get my hands on any BTI bubble detectors, any advice where to find them.
sixpackwill 2 weeks ago
@clagwell - how do you know?
DebateRobo 2 weeks ago
@clagwell Hi, wouldn't you think the helium would better decay down into hydrogen rather than the other way round? And creating helium from hydrogen would require the ability to recreate neutrons, in order for the protons and with the electron compliment in the hydrogen to fuse to them in order to create nucleons of helium. Is this experiment real?
ProjectsBlack 6 hours ago
@clagwell This could be an ionisation effect wouldn't you think?
ProjectsBlack 6 hours ago
just turn this on ant this, hmm mayby a bit more BRGHZHZHZBFPL, oops not.
but, nice project.
bas12345654321 1 month ago
Wow... it produces ... light... like every lightbulb in my home... well... cool lamp, I guess ... lol
TheMightyZwom 1 month ago
look a fucking light bulb... what the fuck......
jednootenboom 1 month ago
Look Mom! DEADLY X-RAYS!
ObiTrev 1 month ago
What looked as a mad scientist actually turned out to be a old guy living with his mum and frying vacuum tubes with a high power RF transmitter. Is your tinkering FCC approved?
rustflekk 1 month ago 3
Nice light bulb! ;)
Khwartz 1 month ago
Excellent catch.
swampfootvindaloo 2 months ago
do you want to tell me that you can create a temperature of about 1000000000°C with that?
TerrAkon3000 2 months ago
is this what happens on the in the sun? nice machine is it safe?
jambuckerwarblast 2 months ago
Im sorry mate, the Pink light bulb has already been invented and doesn't require 1.21 Giga watts to run either.
MrFreddyFeatures 2 months ago 17
@MrFreddyFeatures But so you will know, with fusion or fission you gain energy, but you already know that right, you are just making fun out of people who share with all that is in your funy way :)
kekec1000000 3 weeks ago
хахаха засунул ртутную лампочку в свою установку и пантуется ))))
pufon1000 2 months ago 3
don't know Sellafield, i wonder do you know Teddybear?
darkobscurity.blogspot.com/2008/06/galerie-schallschutz-teddybear-2004-mcd.html
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
Appears on Terry Pratchett's books,
"he joined
the Central Electricity Generating Board and became
press officer for four nuclear power stations.
He'd write a book about his experiences if he thought
anyone would believe it."
?! i'd like to read that.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
if you have trouble understanding my prior comment, then think about how bit-errors work in computer topics - even a change of one bit from a 0 to 1 or a 1 to a 0 or just a loss of one bit, can render an entire file unreadable, a whole program to not run correctly.
it's the same with DNA.
nuclear material isn't safe at all, it's bio-toxic.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
or leukemia etc (like the high incidence of that in places with nuclear, like Sellafield),
that's why nuke power is so deranged - the length of time it stays exceptionally bio-toxic (look at the insane types of facilities they build to contain spent 'fuel') plus the fact the particles leak out.
if enough radioactive particles hit your DNA, then it changes it and every time it unzips itself to rebuild your body, which it is doing all the time, it can't read the DNA anymore so it makes cancers.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
and btw i have seen that and checked it myself with a geiger counter, when a physics class i was in did half-lives and radiation topics at school.
it's not made up - glow in the dark paints ect emit a lot of radiation.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
nice energy release, i agree with rhagel1, if it is fusing gamma radiation must be released,
Rannyfash 2 months ago
H + H=Deuteron +e+ + v
e+ + e= 2 gamma + 1.022Mev
Have you taken a geiger counter and measured any ionizing radiation....there should be some....
Maybe even enough to kill you, if it's fusing....
rhagel1 2 months ago
@rhagel1 given the quality of his setup, I am pretty sure he knows what he's doing.
thetwinkleturnip 2 months ago
Now you can keep your feet warm with the new thermal neutron emitter NEUTR'o'MATIC!!!!, all sparks included!!!!!
Doncoxino 2 months ago
omg you live with you fucking mom dickwad. get a life and do this experiment.
XBLspartanx170 2 months ago
hu?
HaydenHatTrick 2 months ago
R.I.P. Hydrogen
sonicsn4ke 2 months ago
0:45 - whoooooops!
samoht1977 2 months ago
0:46 lol.
swedensy 2 months ago
Fill a balloon with it.
heroineworshipper 2 months ago
you must be very intellegentipatated to use such a complicapated piece of techanolagie
Shadow9tales 3 months ago
why is it everyone looks at stuff like this with such a closed mind yes it may not do what is says it does but there are people trying different ideas to try to make the world better for the rest of us at least entertain themselves with a hobby
swordandsnipe 3 months ago 3
It is my understanding that Beethoven conducts a pretty good symphony of neutrons. ;-)
a2zhandi 3 months ago
four pages of comments and no1 mentions his mom or whoever humming in the background n then she asks a question n he snaps out?? LMAO
smashpit63 3 months ago
No Intelligent life here... Lets check elsewhere.
ACEMAN220 3 months ago
I bet Edward Elric could do this far faster.....
MrTwister9571 3 months ago
Are you driving that thing with a ham radio amplifier?? hehe
xexorz 3 months ago
2:23... i want my wasted time back!!!
oksanaostapyuk 3 months ago 26
What I see is a plasma generator made out of an Icom HF ham radio, a linear amp and a hacked up antenna tuner.
XboxorMat 3 months ago 3
How was that 6 Billion X-Ray flux you experienced?
markakroll 3 months ago
...But will it blend?
insanesk8123 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@insanesk8123 ...But will it blend?
Please please post as many as you can Chuck Norris, Justin Bieber and "Will it bend" comments on Youtube. World really needs that.
MucusFelidae 3 months ago
Dear Retarded Spawn of YouTube: This is not a Fusor (that's Fusor, with an S, Obitrev) it's just the usual free energy scum claiming fusion from nonsensical crack-pottery. Proton-Proton fusion is endothermic, aneutronic and takes an extremely long amount of time to fully go through all the steps to make one He4 nucleus. This particular individual was BANNED from the Amateur Fusor community ages ago. Now, go watch some Fusor videos or the dude smoking a cigarette in one puff.
U235hexafluoridedude 4 months ago 2
Comment removed
U235hexafluoridedude 4 months ago
obviously fake.when fusion started , he and everyone on a mile radius should be cooked instantly
TheKaos90 4 months ago
@TheKaos90
Obviously you know nothing about fusion, so either shut up or get some knowledge before you talk about stuff you don't know.
As someone already stated, this kind of fuison is endothermic, it *needs* energy, so the description of the video ist not completely correct.
You probably also think that a block of Uranium, 50 cm away on your desk would be harmful to you. As long a you don't eat it, grind it, or put it directly onto your skin, the radiation won't reach you at all.
gedankenwelten 3 months ago 12
@gedankenwelten your comment on uranium is rather ignorant. A "block"? How bigger block? 5cm * 5cm? well thats probably ok, 10 * 10? probably ok, 15 * 15? ok probably not ok. 20 * 20? well there goes the neighborhood.
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
No, your comment ist ignorant. The critical mass of Uranium is 16,5 kg (for U 233) to 145 kg (for U 234) given the density of 19,16 g/cm³ you could form a block of 19.6*19,6*19,6 cm out of U 234 without making it explode. You could also mix other material into it. It would still be radioactive, but the critical mass would have to be much higer.
Also there is a fault in your comment: blocks of 20 * 20 do not exist. we call that a rectangle or square. It's 2 dimensional.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten ok well firstly you got me on the only defining two dimensions error, damn that burnt. But seriously, uranium 234? really? coz thats a valid example.. second, cheers for pointing out he example of 233, reaching critical mass with only an 11cm diameter sphere. how bout your standard fissile uranium isotope, 235, critical diameter of 17cm. sure if its 238 your fine, but a block of uranium of an undefined size and isotope such as in your comment can kill you, even subcritical.
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys Then please tell me how a subcritical uranium block will kill you when you don't ingest any uranium? Uranium is an alpha radiator. Alpha particles are the most dangerous when ingested but the least when not ingested, because they only travel a few mm in air.
Did you know that the walls of some old buildings are covered with uranium rich paint that lets you hear a firework when you put your geiger counter close to it? Same with watches or cake plates.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten how? do you know why critical mass is critical? because its the mass required for the neutron emmission to go exponential, a subcritical mass will still emit radiationincreasing radiation proportional to its density, a subcritical mass that is still close to critical mass will still emit immense quantities of radiaion, and yer alpha particles are low penetration, and the vast majority of them still wont reach you, but some will. add to that the beta emmissions -
Xenosys 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten and the fact that this near critical mass or uranium is also now also getting incredibly hot, oxidising to form radioactive, biosoluble gasses and smoke. But dw, im sure youll be fine.
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
It's a fact that Uranium like you find it in nature won't do any harm to you when it's in 50 cm distance on your desk. The beta radiation wont reach you through air and clothes. Also it has no critical mass.
When talking about a block of carbon, do you think I refer to highly refined radioactive carbon isotopes?
Noone ever complained about Uranium-richt Paint or cake plates because there are no records of people ever getting sick of them.
This rediculous conversation ist over.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten id expect it to be >85% carbon i can tell you that
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
Of course, but you'd not expect it to be >85% C-14 that's the point. And you just verified it yourself.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten i admit defeat, i had not considered a block of mixed uranium isotopes, which is of course the most likely block of uranium you're going to find. But hey, you're at least guilty of being slightly vague. come on you've gotta give me something, we've been arguing for like 45min :P
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
I admitt being *slightly* vague. But in case no further information is given, one usually automatically thinks about the most common possibility.
The reason why I posted a comment like this in the first way is, that many people hear words like "Uranium" and think of it like some evil spawn of hell, not knowing that there is much efford invled to make it really dangerous.
Like when you hear "shark" and think of evil man eating creatures or "rat" and disgusting dirty critters.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten agreed, i work on AI a lot and am quite used to peoples missconceptions of danger
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
So we are cool :)
I mean look at the comment I answered with my very first post here...that kind of stupidity makes me nearly angry, moslty because it's presented like the person stating it knows it for sure.
I even had a quarrel with a guy that said the Tsar bomb would unleash 5% of the sun's energy. That's so darn rediculous. Noo, the sun isn't a 330'000 times Earth mass H-bomb itself wichs explosion takes 10 billion years to finish...but the Tsar bomb is like 5% of it *sigh
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten man i remember once working out how much mass the sun consumes every second, cant remember the figure but god damn it was impressive
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
I once calculated how much mass it looses due to fusion (in form of neutrinos and stuff) that was also some number...and yet (I'm also very much into astronomy) it's not much compared to what happens when a supernova goes off. Or the amount of energy that is set free when Mountains on neutron stars (typical mountain hight about a few mm!) collapse. If you could walk on a neutron star and stumble, you'd hit the surface with the energy of several H-bombs xD .
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten i remember something about starquakes being equivalent to 32 yottatons of tnt :p
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
The usual Uranium isotope spectrum is
U-234 0,0055%
U-235 0,72%
U-238 99,27%
That's the Uranium metal you get out of ore. It's practically all U-238 that ist not fissile and barely radiactive compared to the other isotopes.
Now you come an tell me about Weapons grade Uranium (85% U-235). But that's a very special thing. It's altered from usual uranium by humans with much efford. So if you just talk about "Uranium" you usually would refer to the non-altered frorm, wouldn't you?
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten i have agreed twice now
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
Yea, sorry I wrote that before I checked mail again ^^; .
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@Xenosys
Just so that you know: I have a scientific education and during that I had many radioctive Isotopes on my desk. Most of them don't require any protection if you don't touch them with your bare hands.
Back to the Uranium: the critical mass of Uranium in any case only applies to pure isotopes. If you tace the mixture of natural Uranium coming out of the ore, you'll never get to any critical mass. If you would, every county on earth could afford their own atomic bomb.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten weapons grade uranium is only 85% U-235, thats a bit more than trace amounts of impurity i'd say. oh you have a scientific education huh? then i guess you understand how one radioactive isotope is nothing like the next. you've never been anywhere near a remotely concentrated sample of a FISSILE isotope.
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
Man, I mean Uranium in it's natural mix, not Uranium ore, read. Extract uranium from the ore and *don't* refine it. Pure Uranium metal in it's natural isotope mix does by far not have a critical mass, nor will it radiate the hell out of you. Youll get skin cancer when you sleep with it snug tight in the night, yes. And you will die from lung cancer and many others when you engage it with an angle ginder, but you won't be harmed, when it's just standing there.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten that is a valid point. i suppose it would be reasonable to assume that a block of uranium of undefined composition would be of relatively natural ratio of isotopes. Ok you win. On a completely unrelated not man you look so much like the son i would have had if my ex gf and i had one. weird, you look just like a 50/50 mix of us
Xenosys 2 months ago
@Xenosys
Lol, you watched my vids?
Not much scientific stuff there, but youtube is definately not the right place to discuss science lol. I'm an asperger type person, mainly tinkering with with technical stuff...or grinding telescope mirrors lol.
The thing about the 50/50 mix could be coincidencence, even if I was your child. Phaenotype and genotype are not that simple too, but at least it's possible.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@Xenosys
Stop idealising everything what I say so it fits your argumentation.
No, I have not been anywere near a fissile isotope. But that's not the question here. In my initial comment I never said a word about weapon grade Uranium or anything else than just "Uranium". And just "Uranium" is pure uranium in it's usual isotope spectrum wich is radioactive, but far from being fissile or showing any exponential neutron count when you stack it.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@Xenosys
The Uranium need to be purified in an extreme complex and expensive machinery so you get a product that actually has a critical mass somewhere. So if you just take uranium like you find it in nature, you can even put 100 tons of it onto your desk ant theneigborhood would be save. At least from the brute force of an atomic blast. Like I said, ingesting Uranium is a different thing, so you must not grind it etc. .
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten you said a block of uranium, not uranium ore. a block of sodium is not a block of salt and a block of iron is not a block of rust.
Xenosys 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Xenosys
I was referring to a block on your desk...I don't know your desk, but mine does not support 145 kg for a rather huge 19.6*19.6*19.6 cm cube . I was indeed thinking about somethin like 5*5*5 or 10*10*5, I'd say that also counts as a block.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten ::nod:: I'd say if you could use no power, some LSD, and cause a vagina to gratify me from vast distances instantaeously.... well now I wager that would do a better service to humanity. :)
Flayprime 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - what sort of uranium? given that things like glow-in-the-dark toys and paints do emit much more radiation than background.
radioactive substances tend to be constantly decaying, ie releasing radiation.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
A block of uranium metal. NOT enriched uranium (I got into a discussion about that one, but enriched uranium is aldredy modified by humans - I talk about the isotope mix youll find in nature, that radioactive but can't explode).
It will make you geiger counter squeak like hell, but only at very close distance (some mm) since uranium is an alpha emitter and alpha radiation - despite it's the most ionizing one - travels not far. Same for watches and stuff.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - so not yellow cake then.
thing about watches, if you mean the dayglo type? - those tend to be in very close proximity to the skin.
also, it isn't safe to have things that emit radiation around, it doesn't matter if the particles aren't as detectable a few mm away, they've still been released and will have travelled through the walls and out into the open air etc. all it takes is enough of those particles hitting your DNA, after a few transcripts you get cancer
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
There is only urianium in very old watches, more modern watches have radium. New watches actually haven't any radioactive in them. However, there are tritium gas lights, you can buy them in the trekking store. It's a bit of - tritium wich is a beta emitter - molten in a pice of glas with a fluorescent coat on the inside. The gals totall absorbs even the beta radiation, wich is less harful but longer reaching then alpha.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
In old watches that do their glow with alpha emitters, the glas and for sure the metal between your skin and the glow paint is enough to absorb the faint radiation.
The tritium gas lights are even considered save when you break them. To achive a faint glow only a very small amout of radioactivity is needed. You shouldn't scrape off the glow paint, that's right.
About the dose of radioactivity: the body can repair DNA damage to a certain amount.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
That means that there is treshold above that you get cancer, more or less propotional to the dose (actually sigmoidal), below that, the chance to get cancer from radiation is zero. Think of it like: the body can repair 10 DNA damages per minute. If you ret radiated for 9 then nothing will happen. if you get radiated for 11 there is a slight chance you get cancer. If you are radiated for 100 there is a great chance you get cancer.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - it's irrelevent that it can repair itself, cause that is like saying you can slash and stab people so many times and they'll be ok everntually as the blood loss isn't enough to overwhelm the coagulating and healing of the wound.
no nuclear material is safe. the particles are emitted (whatever types isn't the point, it's just that eg gamma is more difficult to contain. they all do damage and are toxic to biology).
stats isn't real life.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
You know, ther are bacteria that thrive on radioactivity. That about "toxic to biology". Of course that's an extreme specialty but you can't generalize like that. Radiactivity is not good for any life, but a low amount of radioactivity is everywhere and life accomodated to it. There IS a treshold, that's a fact you can read up.
Belive what you want. I explained it to you and I'm a bit educated in that matter. I won't go futher here with the discussion.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - so what? there's crusteaceans that live on volcanic vents. the other 99.9% of biology don't and would die in those conditions.
if you want to be a radiation-consuming bacteria then that is fine, as you'd only be living underground anyway away from most other biology.
it's immensely stupid a thing to mess about with, especially artificially. it isn't required. the harm far outweighs any supposed benefits.
do places like Sellafield hire you to avoid lawsuits?
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
I don't even know Sellafield. I'm just an autistic nerd and scientist and a freak of nature and truth on top of that. And I hate it when peopeIe have wrong perception about things, animals or humans. I once declined a job where they said I should talk the people into bying computer stuff. So much about my honesty.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - then why ignore the greats of your country and culture then, eg Vogel, Goethe, Steiner - anyone that has a clue about science really.
it's bad enough nuke is toxic to biology and ecosystem in a purely reductionist science way - in real proper holistic science it's even more of an abomination.
sales jobs are pusher jobs really. goddam the pusher man, the pusher is not a dealer.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - if They say you're autistic then you may have been misdiagnosed, remember that 'metal illnesses' have no pathology, they can't be deteced in autopsies etc.
w w w geocities(dot)com/growingjoel/mywindow.html
read them put the 'normals' in their place. the 'normals' are completely abnormal and un-natural and they cannot explain themselves without reference to having merely gone along with things they were told to or thought they should.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
No, particles are not released an sufficient amount to do damage to you when you don't scrape on uranium, uranium paint etc. . And you are wrong about the particles not being detected. A geiger counter isn't able to detect every single gamma quant, but it's anble to detect every singe beta or alpha particle. One click from the geiger means exactly one hit from one decauing atom. So yes, you can detect single atoms. If your chamber does not go 360 °
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
then of course you only detect the particels headed your way. Usually that means you detect every third decay.
But I get the feeling with particles you mean alpha and beta and not paint particles. In this case you are even more wrong. The particles are getting stopped by matter. The denser the matter the higher the stopping power. gold an lead are among the best stoppers. But even more important ist the size and the charge of the praticel.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
See, alpha particles are the fattes ones, they carry 2 positive charges, as alpha particles are nothing else but helium nuclei. Beta particles are nothing else but electrons, so they carry one minus charge. Gamma rays are EM radiation, like x-rays just with more energy.
The ionizing (and that means the DNS damaging) potential comes from the charge they carry for the 2 first kinds of radiadion. Alpha with 2+ does much damage, beta with 1- does low damage.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
The particles to damage when they hit a molecule. Their kinetic and electric energy gets absorbed by the molecule that then breaks. That means, that the Alpha and beta particels are totally absorbed during that. That's why high damaging particles do not fly as far as low damaging paricles. Damage and travel length are bound to each other, that's what I want to say with that.
Tha also counts for gamma. Gamma even penetrates 30 cm of lead or more.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
But for your body it's the least dangerous. The #1 source of danger are alpha radiators, that's right. But usually only when they get vaporized or aerosolized. Of course, if you carry a block of uranium around, wich is not advisable, then it will get scraped and you'll inhale that and become sick. But if it's on your desk, 50 cm away, like in my initial comment, there is absolutely nothing to fear. I should say, that it was meant for demonstration.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
I wouldn't put a block of unsealed uranium un my desk for more than a week.
On a sidenote, you can get several radioactive minerals on a mineral bazar without any special license or so. I'd keep them in some sort of decorative platic box, though. So the wind does not blow their dust ti my lungs.
Being so concerned about tiny doses of radiation, you shouldn't make long lights or go into caves/or cellars.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888 The uranium wich is naturally in the earth decays into a radioactive radon isotope that fumes out of the soil. And on a long (=high) fligth you get a dose of x-ray and gamma rays like you would in the CT (wich is a lot more than for a usual x-ray picture, I think 80 times a much). Here in germany are some cellars in a certain region where I personally wouldn't want to stay longer than 10 min. per day. I'd rather put uranium metal in my cupboard.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - it isn't safe at all.
that's why in nature it's found way underground, where no-one should be going to do things like dig it up. cause it's not as if they need it for anything. even long-haul space travel (which is stupid for other reasons) is a poor candidate for nuke power.
i get the feeling you like to try to hide how toxic and dangerous nuclear is, by posting a lot of the scientific data on it.
why would anyone ever do that. is the question.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
Lol, now you sound like a creationist. It isn't safe and that's why it is found undergroiund? That's neiter completely true nor is it the reasony why it'S found underground. I tell you the reason: Radiactive elements are mostly elements with very big nuclei. And that means they are heavy. What do heavy thing do? They fall to the ground. When the gound is molten, like in primordial times, when earth got born, it will sink to the bottom. That's why it's underground -.- .
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - telling the truth about radioactive material and nuclear energy et uses is creationism? how so? sounds like you have brain cancer etc already there.
cause there's no logical step between what i posted and what you drew from it at all.
so what if its underground from being heavy? that changes nothing as to what i wrote, that you are trying to spam out with irrelevent science on nuclear.
just kill yourself freak.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@JustSomePerson888
In space there is nothing to block the radiation from the stars (wich would be air on earth). It's x-rays and gamma, lesser alpha and beta they can be easily shilded with the vehicles hull). The sun radiates neutron too, that's not nice.
I never said that radiactivity in general is safe.
And I'm talking all science because that's how I talk. I'm a scienentist and I'm a nerd on top of that.
Now go and bother someone else with your "noone should go there" argumentation.
gedankenwelten 2 months ago
@gedankenwelten - oh you see that as creationism?! when it's just common sense, no need to believe in anything except that.
your dna has developed (sans tampering) to exist with an atmosphere entirely shielded from outer space.
that plus space exploration via long haul - is very stupid. humans aren't equipped for that, hence why stupid shit like cryo is considered as an option. you are insane, and i'd wager you give your greener parts of Deutschland a bad name. sell-out.
k.y.
JustSomePerson888 2 months ago
@TheKaos90 or just a few stray neutrons are produced... but hey, who's counting?
xexorz 3 months ago
well ist fake this was just leds!!!!
adler3008 4 months ago
@adler3008 It's a demonstration of a Philo-Fuzor. It was meant to fuze Hydrogen into Helium, but unfortunately it was a dead end. Although, it is great for making x-rays and cancer.
ObiTrev 4 months ago
I am extremely interested in fusion such as this. Can you send me the plans for this?
butterfingers8008 7 months ago
So people can make nuclear fusion at home now? If anyone ever doubted the Bible for saying that God would destroy the wicked nations with fire, it's time to consider the many dangers and possibilities.
Psychophantasmagoria 10 months ago
@Psychophantasmagoria If god where here he'd probably tell you to go do some research before posting stupid comments.
MegaDeathwarrant 10 months ago
@Psychophantasmagoria we don't even have viable nuclear fusion on a massive scale, let alone at home. grow a brain and try to think before talking about your imaginary friends online.
D34Df007 4 months ago
@D34Df007 I know! its funny right?! even E=mc2 is wrong, the nerve of pioneers these days... PPPFFt
lykenth08 4 months ago
@lykenth08 Well actually google neutrinos faster than light.
nickrohn93 4 months ago
@nickrohn93 lol i know - i think its excellent. i was trying to be sarcastic to the other comment =D lol
lykenth08 4 months ago
@lykenth08 Sorry I didn't bother to skim the argument below :p
nickrohn93 4 months ago
we should bring it in front to know that the verification of emitted light could be change while interact with fequencys. (laserbeammodulation)
so the question was, " can we understand the differance of h2, he2 plasma. and could it be posible to detect diferance of the plasma while handel it" to stard a compare test with real h2, he2 plasma...
may this passes the way ;-)
onchange 11 months ago
Magnetics electrification coil. Nice. In future i try make 18 magnetic coil in one. I thing to make even matrix one down element. :)
rolandas1985 1 year ago
Yeah Grandma is going to glow in the dark, like your nutsack !!
omg why dont you shield or get propper distance ?
hackie77 1 year ago
Fusion of two hydrogen nuclei to make a helium nuclei and release a neutron.GREAT!
MasterChief241 1 year ago
Two words: Ionizing Radiation
You need to move behind a lead-paraffin shield while your testing your fusor.
I don't care how few neutrons it is releasing, it can't be good for your health.
Great work though, I'm glad to see civilian science powering foreword!
AdamoAmplexus 1 year ago
ACME Recording Studio of Scottsdale, AZ : I bet this gadget you built, " really glows in the dark" Cheers Thomas in Vancouver.
BOMBOVA 1 year ago
but can you cook meth? thats what i want to know!
Berialavrenti 2 years ago
No, that was not the idea. I am trying to obtain energy by thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen.
Chris64Strev 2 years ago
you want to prove the Red Giant theory?? Sir.
fmamand 2 years ago