Added: 3 years ago
From: moogheer
Views: 6,914
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (135)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • one of the guys who played bond (roger moore) said he was perfect for the part. that should count

  • *hem hem* Craig is clearly bond

  • *he

  • Comment removed

  • @moogheer Dont you feel bad for todays youth? That they have to see James Bond portrayed as some emotionless homosexual looking robot? All u craig likers are giving the same facts to, that Ian Fleming portrayed Bond as more serious in earlier novels, SO WHAT!!? Do u go out and read the books when u want some Bond? I dont think so!!! All in all I suppose we should be more mad at Broccoli Films, or even United Artists ect..

  • How much longer is Bond not going to be 007?

  • @FoxPlant2006 LOL i know right?im waiting for MGM to go back to the original classic cool bond, not this hitman bondlookinglikeavillian blonde hair 0 personality bullshit.

  • @burtonrules123 you people make me sick THERE IS A REASON

    THE WAY THEY ARE!Ask questions and learn before you attack!

  • @58fenix sorry but die another day was not so bad that they needed to make bond uber realistic and un fun like they did with the new batman movies. bale and craig suck at what they do, ie playing heroes is that bland boring dull way.

  • @burtonrules123 YES IT WAS!Okay 2 things are we talking about

    bond or batman.Because those are two different things here.Your

    problem is your showing you true colors.you dont know whays going

    on and your confused because you think bond is suppose to be the

    bond we know when connery,moore and brosnan were bond.But your

    lack of knowledge is low.You do know that these bond films are not

    suppose to be like theothers yet and the bond we see is how bond

    WAS before the 60's.

  • @burtonrules123 I mean ask questions,but you non bond fans dont do

    that.Never!There are so many reasons why the way they are and to be real

    I dont have the energy to sit here and write to like a hundred people why

    because it gets old.You continue to be lost and if i was wrong in what I

    was saying then craig would'nt be bond but he still is so that means I

    am right.

  • @burtonrules123 Now for batman here's the thing I do agree with you on some

    parts about that because,I do like director Nolan and bale but they do a great

    job making it look so badd ass but when it comes to fight sense's and chemestry

    and soem what acting about the villians it does'nt work.I did like how heath played

    the joker along side jack,but how they have batman fight I think is ridiculous and it

    sucks and that stupid voice does'nt work.

  • @burtonrules123 you see when keaton played it he did'nt have to be a badd

    ass,he was a badd ass.Thats why he was the best.Not that I dont think bale

    is a great pick for bruce wayne but there are things missing even though it

    is the beggining of batman but still.Were's the nin-jit-su at that batman knows.

    He's not a ufc fighter,he's a some what matrial artist when it comes to fight

    scences.I did not like who they picked for harvey dent two face his acting did

    not work.

  • @burtonrules123 Bruce wayne is suppose to know jit-jits-su!He's

    not some badd ass ufc fighter he's a some what matrial artist.Dont

    get me wrong though I do like how they make it look but when it comes

    to fight scences.I disagree,when keaton was batman he did'nt try to

    be like a badd ass he was a badd ass thats what I liked about him.

    Val kilmer was awesome as well.

  • @burtonrules123 Bruce wayne is suppose to know jit-jits-su!He's

    not some badd ass ufc fighter he's a some what matrial artist.Dont

    get me wrong though I do like how they make it look but when it comes

    to fight scences.I disagree,when keaton was batman he did'nt try to

    be like a badd ass he was a badd ass thats what I liked about him.

  • fleming personally liked connery and said he was what he envisioned for the character, so take a look at connery then look at craig... WOW i think that speaks for itself!

  • @allthingsclassicrock Your wrong buddy!Your not speaking for anyone.

  • @58fenix exactly like i said daniel craig not looking like any of the other bonds speaks for itself :)

  • @allthingsclassicrock He will be, he's still bond.No one ever

    said he was'nt bond anymore.He's still in it.Bond 23 will

    be made and if bond 23 never gets made then I will say

    your right.But until then your wrong.

  • @58fenix i didnt say he wasnt going to be bond anymore this has nothing to do with his future status as bond i'm sure hes signed up for the next one, i'm just saying (and alot of people feel this way) that he does not look the part or for that matter play it well.

  • @allthingsclassicrock Do you get it.do you know how

    many times roger moore was told he does'nt look

    the part and still proved he was bond.Craig still

    has the pretty boy look.He 's just different.He looks

    like a cold blooded real life agent.Thats what I like

    about him!

  • ahhaha ;) nice one 

  • Your right bond fans dont think like me.REAL bond

    fans think like me.You are no pro when it comes to

    bond.

  • @58fenix I don't get it? Well i think you are the one that doesen't get it, first of all James Bond was from the start thought like a seductive character, that is the essence of Bond, the character i and many other Bond fans got caught by not the badass. Then you can't generalize your opinion only to look more persuasive! You think all "bond fans" think like you and i don't agree at any point!

  • @kingmercury5 No your wrong,the bond we all know is

    when connery first became bond.The bond YOU dont

    know is written in the books before connery.Craig is

    who bond starts to be,before he becomes 007.

  • The real Bond was the Bond that made a legend, yeah i obviously notice this Bond im talking about is very comercial but is the Bond many fans love and know.

  • 007 has style, a sharp and fine sense of humor, he isn't a Hollywood badass, he in very few ocassions let his feelings control his acts, he THINKS first before he makes a move. He isn't the kind of loser that shoots first and makes questions later! THATS NOT BOND! I hope Craig and the whole "new Bond concept" fiasco end soon, i miss the REAL James Bond bring him back!

  • @kingmercury5 You dont get it.Bond is learning

    and growing has they go with craig.When are you

    people and i mean real bond fans understand we

    has people are not suppose to see the bond we

    know yet!

  • @678lunatic IM 21 AND I HATED THE LAST 2 MOVIES!!! I don't think age is the only factor that makes someone to have a critic opinion. But anyway ,except in the age thing, i totally agree with you James Bond is not a fucking bully like the last 2 movies made him look like.

  • @kingmercury5  -I agree with you totally (age 39).

  • @kingmercury5 Bond was a bully and a basterd

    before he became a pro.What you are seeing

    now is the real bond and how he should have

    been made.

  • That's right, you see! Edward Fox knew it! I always said that Craig is NOT a Bond! Fuck the last two Bond movie's!

  • Comment removed

  • Will if you understood what bond is really

    about and who he really is,you would

    understand why bond is who he is in

    CR and QOS!Real bond fans understand

    and know craig is bond!

  • @58fenix, you're not very convincing in your claim as a real Bond fan. You do know by now that any number of Bond fans who have read the books and followed the films do not accept Craig as Bond. Many of us think It's a great idea to go back to the blunt tool before "Bond", but Craig still doesn't fit the bill. The man lacks genuine charisma, the ability to get the entire audience over to his side. Craig has been the most divisive Bond ever. Nothing to do with logic, it's to do with gut feeling.

  • @jemimakahn You do know you are completly

    100% wrong!You must not have been on you

    tube that much.Let me correct you,everyone that

    has read the books know that craig fits bond

    almost perfectly.You do not know what you are

    talking about.And the most devisive bond of

    all time is dalton by only doing two movies.

    Listen here and you read this LEARN YOUR

    HISTORY BEFORE YOU CONFRONT!GETS

    SOME FACTS!

  • @58fenix , I doubt you get anyone over to your way of thinking since all you do is claim that everyone's wrong and that they don't know what they're talking about. Present a solid argument in connection with the books and maybe it'll be worth reading what you have to say. Dalton wasn't divisive as Bond simply because people were largely indifferent. His supporters were few at the time. Craig has more supporters and also a large body of detractors, hence the term divisive.

  • @jemimakahn Excuse,excuse,excuse.Listen!Da­lton

    was not interesting enough to continue bonds journey.

    The fact is he only did two films and was boring.As for

    me telling everyone is wrong.No I dont tell everyone

    that there wrong.I only tell people that are wrong unlike

    your self,that they dont know what there talking about.

    I have read the books,and for someone to tell me that

    I have'nt read anything,you certainly havent read anything.

    Again Learn your history before you confront.

  • @58fenix, you're the one who's extremely repetitive in your comments. OK, let's say I know nothing of Bond's history. So, you O Wise One, have a chance to give me one decent convincing illustration as to why Craig is close to Fleming's vision of Bond. Don't give me that same old chestnut about how others who've read the books say Craig is close to Fleming's Bond. You gove me a lucid argument supporting your claim. If you evade this question, you're the one who's making the excuses.

  • @jemimakahn I refuse to respond to a non bond fan.

    By telling why craig is the right choice.I have read the

    books.And there is a bond book that I have read called

    High time to kill.It was never made into a bond films.

    But when I read it the way it was written I saw two

    people who coul play bond in this book.Connery and

    Moore were the two.It fits them perfectly.The books

    describe bond as a rugthless,dark,cold blooded killer.

    But at the sametime worked as a good guy to take

    out bad guys.

  • @jemimakahn I refuse to respond to you but I'll tell you

    anyway.I'm just tired of reapting myself to you people.

    Look the bottom line is this We finally have a bond

    were we can see what he was like before he became

    a real 00.And craig is the answer.I dont think connery

    and moore could have played it like that.Not even brosnan.

    But they play bond how everyone see's bond.Has for

    craig he's the darker approach and thats cool.Bottom

    line CRAIG IS BOND GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Sorry for all the spelling mistakes...

  • I've watched GE an PB showed at least 5 facial expressions (= emotions) and I saw CR and DC showed only one facial expression and a sth that looks like a smile ones. Don't get me wrong but only those actors are good who are able to show emotion through their acting which is mainly with their face. I saw DC inanother movie and he hat 2 or 3 facial expression. So he can act but he didn't in CR I'm afraid!

  • in my opinon Iam flemmings vision must be up to the time or The Bond as a franchise will Die Craig has got the edge mate!

  • Agreed - Daniel Craig is NOT in any shape or form 007!

  • Only a few of the movies were based on the books. The Bond in the books was not going to sell in the movies so he was changed. Most don't know Roger Moore was the first choice over Connery.

  • Most of the films are based on the books. Where are people getting your facts from? Craig's the least profitable? What is going on here?

  • I imply that those who like the last 2 Craig Bondfilms are between 14 and 30/32 years old. Come on, let's be fair: the last 2 film where absolutely terrible, that's a fact: too violent, too much action to name but a few negative aspects. That's why mature people don't like the last 2 - for a good reason.

  • I'm mid 40's Craig movies were the least profitable of all of them.

  • @678lunatic ancient roots you mean lol

  • @678lunatic . im 25 and i dislike craig as bond. im a traditional 007 fan which means i prefer all the old ones. i agree way oo voilent with craig. i felt uncomfterbale watching CR

  • @thefuckincoolone Have you've ever read the books?Dont lie

  • @58fenix . no i havent

  • @thefuckincoolone Then keep your thoughts to yourself because you dont have a clue what you are talking about.

  • @58fenix . i know what i like and i like the fun goofy bonds with cheesy one liners so there. everyones diffrent.

  • @678lunatic

    I'm 34 & I'm mature. And I like the films Craig in. You're a pussy if you think the movies are too violent. Newsflash: they're suppose to be very violent. Every movies that deal with secret agent stopping terrorist are suppose to be very violent. Beside, if it was too violent it would've been rated R. I think people like you are too young to get Bond when you first saw GoldenEye. In fact, I bet you grew up with that than what Fleming really created & Craig is part of that.

  • The name's bland, really bland.

    Daniel craig ruined bond, he looks like the bad guy from die hard 2.

  • or a big blonde hernchmen in like the other 007 flims like From Russia with love, you only live twice, the living daylights and Tomorrow never dies

  • he should've been in the hitman movie too although he doesn't look like codename 47, he's got that underlying dangerousness and mystery - the blue eyes are incredibly piercing i think

  • Having just watched that B class movie, 'Quantum of solace' again I stand by my original statement that it is a dreadful film and not worthy of being called a Bond film. I believe Sir Roger Moore commented on it in the negative.

  • Sorry - C class movie!

  • Comment removed

  • CRAIG + BOND = BAD BOND FILM.

  • ur retarded. Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace were the best bond films. u just dont like his bond films cause they are differnt. and tahts good that they are differnt. why do u wanna watch 22 Bond films if they are all the same?

  • sean connery is the best james bond

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Daniel Craig is too violent for a bond.Brosnan is the best james bond actor.

  • Alright! another video made i love it!

  • Comment removed

  • haha cool. I liked the caricatures. That's pretty much how he looks to me. And when I saw him first in Road to Perdition, I thought "that's a pretty creepy, weird-looking guy." DEFINITELY didn't think "that guy is James Bond material."

  • Daniel Craig! Gay, Ugly, Wierd, and absolutely no charm to attract women. If they are attracted to him, they'd be Gay chasers!

    Even he says he wants to modernize Bond and have him in a gay tryst! WTF? Bond should never be gay!!!

  • That's what I read at James Bond Wiki. Not that he's gay. But that he wants to modernize Bond with a gay scene. I've seen Casino Royale and liked it, bcuz he's still womanizing.

    But while searching the web, found out Craig'd done a gay scene where he kissed a guy!

    Now he may be just a really good actor. But you couldn't pay me enough to do any kind of gay scene! So I just hope they don't do something foolish, like have him kiss a guy or of a sexual nature!!! That'd ruin James Bond!!!

  • We dont need a new kind of Bond, We want to go back to Old School Bond, dont you get it?!!!!

  • Dude I understand what your saying,but,We have

    had 3 very good Bonds already.Connery,Moore,

    and Brosnan.Don't you think we need to change

    a little bit.We can't just keep having the same

    old bond.Craigs bond is just different.

  • We cant just keep having the same old james bond.Craigs bond shows more of a darkside.

    Connery had the charm,smoothness and the look.

    Brosnan was a smooth bond,Moore too.

  • So,my point is,is everybody that has played

    bond has played bond in different ways.The

    only thing that I think craig is missing is

    smoothness.He has a lot of danger to him.I

    Know that for sure.100%Danger,now don't you get it!!!!!!

  • Yeah, but my point is, Bond is supposed to be kind of like a pickup artist...smooth, cold, and straight to the point.

    It's not just about the danger!! If that's what you want to see, you can always watch the Bourne Trilogy.

  • First of all I know thats your opinion and

    I respect that,but Whyyyyyy are people comparing Bourne to bond.They have nothing in

    common.Except for The danger and to me Craigs

    bond might be the closess one to bourne.But,

    they are not the same.

  • Actually, I think you nailed it on the head. Bourne is not like Bond, but, it follows that Craig's portrayal fits closer to the character of Bourne or like-style film. This distinction is making a 'stink'. The traditional enjoyers of Bond feel betrayed and a new audience have been attracted who similarly appreciate films like XXX with VinDiesel, Bourne trilogy, and WWE wrestling. This is a far cry from the dry-humored, witty, and sly tongue-in-cheek classic known as James Bond.

  • Now you are right about what you said about

    who bond is,but Craig does show cold and

    has a little charm and the best way to

    describe him is he is straight to the point.

    Your right his smoothness is very little though.

  • daniel craig is a homo google it

    he suggested bond should sleep with a man

  • Yeah I heard about it too,but its false

  • Everybody has their own opinion but Daniel Craig is doing a badass job.His doing it in his own way thats what makes all the bond's special. They bring something different to the bond characther.

  • Craig needed getting used too. Some FACTS 1 not all of Connerys Bond movies are good 2 Die Another Day was rubbish 3 Dalton was crap as Bond. Why else did Bond movies disappear for 6 years. Yes Craig does have a sense of humour bypass but he is hard relentless killer. Anyway after Mama Mia Brosnan can fuck off!

  • Pierce bronson

    he seems to be james bond with ease

    daniel craig was trying way to hard and he doesnt make james bond likeable

    pierce always seem calm and like I said ease

  • Dude I just saw Solace,you are wrong.I know its your opinion,but your wrong.solace proves he as

    everything bond has.His bond was very

    interesting.Now I know in Royal he's just being

    a badd ass and your not quiet sure if he's bond

    yet,but in solace He's very interesting.

  • yeah ! i agree, he's d best bond eva !!

  • He's got a lot of danger,he was very funny,

    and he really showed a side of bond that he

    wasn't afraid of anything.Now you do have a strong point about him trying to hard but,when

    you see solace.You might change your mind.

  • What an utter plum you are!

  • Who could be BOND ?? Perhaps an X-Factor type programme to find a NEW BOND? Well what do you think!

  • Well it can't get much worse.

  • Mr Thunder, I do so agree, it could well have been flipping Jude Law!!

    But do you agree a World wide "Find a Bond X-Factor" could be popular, perhaps get Sean Connery to be a judge?

  • That would be phenomenal, at least we know one judge would know what he was talking about.

  • 1 sean connery : the real and the best 007

    2 pierce brosnan : second the best 007

    3 roger moore

    4 timothy dalton

    5 george lazenby

    6 daniel craig

  • was there a cartoon casino royale maid?

  • sorry,  made

  • the best james bond is ``SEAN CONNERY´´

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more