Cars kill more people. Remember Registration leads to confiscation which leads to oppression. Look at Turkey, Germany, any place that has confiscated guns in the past has turned on it's own people. The most pro-advocacy gun group are Jewish. There is a historical reason for this. The second amendment in the States was to allow average citizens to guarantee their freedom from an oppressive government. The founding fathers knew this to be true, as they just fled from an oppressive King.
Well, thinking you need to have the firepower of an army, isn't exactly self-defence. Self-defence is when someone attacks you, and you defend yourself against their attacks. Having a gun at that time, might save your life, but what about all the situations where people aren't threatened on their life, but decide they can shoot people anyway? Gun-nuts are basicly saying it's ok to sacrifice 11000 people a year, just so they can keep their FAMAS. Sad logic.
@Faerlon123 Exactly when has a civilian FAMAS ever been used in the commission of a crime in either the USA or in Canada (as this is a Canadian video). Which of the over 9 million legally owned firearms in Canada have been used to commit a crime. A percentage will do, backed up by Stats Canada plz. I believe in proper Vetting/background checks of an individual but most if not all criminals will not be legally obtaining anything.
@terrybeb I was not talking about the individual in this video specifically. I'm not stupid, i'm not saying everyone who owns guns just go out and shoot random people. I'm just saying the liability of allowing anyone, practically anyone, own weapons outweighs the positive aspects of it. If you allow nice, law-abiding citizens to have weapons, you are also allowing psychopathic,sociopathic serial-killers the opportunity aswell. And that's not a good thing.
@Faerlon123 Your logic as well intentioned as it is....is flawed. The criminal element already have the guns. Only law abiding people obey the laws. So the responsible people stay unarmed. In a perfect world I would agree. Norway shooting in July 2011 for example. How well did that go.....In Florida the first to issue CCW the crime rate dropped 70% overnight. The bad guys didn't know who would be shooting back anymore. Check out the gun laws in Canada. Very strict as well. Doesn't help.
@terrybeb My logic is still irrefutable. If the USA had a better culture of weaponhandling, it's true, you wouldn't have avoided Virginia Tech and all these ghastly episodes. but you would avoid 11000 gun homicides a year. Terror episodes like Virginia Tech and Columbine are just made more possible with gun laws like the ones America have, especially in a country that's growing more and more economically challenged. If the gun laws in USA are so helpful, why doesn't it help?
@Faerlon123 It has that's the point. Homicide rates have actually gone down. It's not perfect for sure. Nothing is that's my point. People kill People, it's sad but it's a fact. Ok, would you be scared if you saw me on the street with a gun at my side. How about if I had a hammer on my tool belt. Probably not right? Be honest...... I could kill you quicker with that hammer...Why because you weren't prepared for it. Do you have care insurance? Why? Are you that dangerous of a driver?
@terrybeb Ok nothings perfect. I agree to that. But making the problem worse by letting more and more people have guns is not the way to IMPROVE the problem. And equating car insurance with allowing people to own and carry weapons is total bullshit. Car insurance is a way to make sure you don't have to pay the full amount if someone crashes into you. If you trust millions of citizens, owning and carrying weapons, be my guest, but I don't even trust a cop with them, neither should I.
I would hope that we all now realize, Libs included, that the gun reg did not work, did not save anyone, and in fact uselessly diverted billions which could have been utilized to fight ACTUAL gun crime, not harass farmers, hunters, and sport shooters. I would hope that we also now realize that it is time for Canada to support and allow a law abiding citizen's right to defend themselves and their families from violent criminal elements of society. CCW LICENSES FOR LAW ABIDING CANADIANS NOW!!!
Yeh cause a shotgun will help you when you are out clubbing in your skin tight dress with tiny handbag and you walk down a dark alley and get taken from behind. Guns only escalate situations unless in a fortified powerful position. Learn a self defense like Krav Maga and youll be fine even if they have a gun itll soon become yours.
@DREwestcoast Lol i actually dont watch TV at all and i train in Krav Maga and am in the Australian Defence Force and i have had many encounters with people in dark alleys. Most of the time talking your way out of it is best. But please tell me where a girl out on the down would saddle her shotgun?
@1stNightingale obviously the girl doesn't carry a fucking shotgun for self-defense, she illustrated the point with it, I thought it was pretty easy to understand
@DREwestcoast Why doesn't she have a side arm? That would be a more realistic display of what is capable rather than brandishing it like shes tough shit. Just dislike gun totting madness. I know its uses but really alot of the time you dont need it because most wont give you the chance to use it. Men attacking woman do so from behind or they wait til they are up close to start the threat. Pulling out a gun can complicate things when a swift kick to the go-nads will take him down.
@1stNightingale I know, I'm with you on this, sometimes people forget the scaring power of a warning shot, I'm not for gun nuts either, as far as from behind, I think women would make contact with their baby-looking glock 36 rather quick if some shady guy was following her, the attack scenario you're speaking of rarely happens in broad daylight anyway, but I do get your point.
@DREwestcoast Yeh but most guys wont walk behind someone they will lie in wait for an ambush. Just what studies on rapists say. so being able to defend against a hair grab or a bear hug is the best.
@DREwestcoast NEVER, NEVER NEVER, I repeat NEVER fire a warning. The only time you should be firing is when your life in danger and when it is you take the shot that stops that threat.
I don't know who told you to fire warning shots but there is not a justifiable homicide course or CCW class that in the world that will tell you to get fire a warning shot.
it is stupid how U.S morons like this chick ALL have a fucking gun in there closet, and use it when they have a bad feeling and feel unsafe.
If i walked behind a girl in america and didnt notice (or towards her) i can GAURANTEE id get peppersprayed, or "RAPE WHISTLE" or shot, because she watched to many movies.
@biggestFFXIfan O please you ignorant fuck. None of what you typed is even close to true. Why dont you VISIT AMERICA before you pull shit out your ass about it. Dont take everything you get from people about america being full of idiots truley my friend. That just shows your ignorance. You have never been here. Yes there is some ignorant people here but those kinds of people are everywhere. There is a HELL OF ALOT LESS then you could ever imagine. When seconds count the police are minutes away
@biggestFFXIfan Once again you dont live here. How can you believe something you have never seen? Once again that shows you ignorance and your incompetence to make a valid point. Girls do jump to conclusions all of them do. But 99% of them are not like that. Where did you get this information? Larsjake is right you do watch to much T.V. Every over seas station rubs off American's as dumbass hilljacks. Which is not true.
@biggestFFXIfan Actually she is not American..... She is Canadian. And a pretty level headed one at that. Also, it is law that Canadian women have the right to ATC (authorization to Carry) if under threat from a dangerous spouse with permission from the CFO (Canadian firearms Officer). THe problem is they have never given permission for self defense even though it is a charter right.......
The world would have been much better off if guns were never invented. And the "I may be blonde, but I am not stupid" part just kind of reinforces the stereotype by mentioning it...
@ruj1970 How could they rule us without force or weapons? Im all for gun ownership and the right of a well armed militia to protect the free state. As I am part of a militia. But your comment does not make sense.
@ruj1970 Very mature. All I ask is how can a dictatorship rule without weapons. That is how the spread fear is it not? You said if guns were never invented then dictators and tyrants would rule us all. How could that be possible? Do they not use guns to come to power? Perhaps you are the Idiot here.
The way you're holding that gun. Girl, you wanna kill yourself?
Furthermore, before you act like a donkey, look at the statistics for the EU. With a few exceptions (UK and Belgium), generally, there's strict gun control, which results in low violent crime. In the UK, there is a lot of gang violence, and Belgium is like the Rifle River. SO MANY GUNS TO AND FRO. Also, look at Japan. In 2006, 616 homicides in the whole country and 240 firearm crimes.
@weurRTG actually I have seen all the stats and it proves that firearms, especially in conceal and carry use deter crime. I guess your an expert on safe gun handling? Do you hold any courses I could take?
@CanadaMadness I have to agree with both your comments. Hope the government keeps the promise and disposes of the stupid, expensive B.S. that has cost us BILLIONS over the last 16 years. I'd rather have my daughter explain why she blew a potential rapist away, than have to visit her in the hospital or morgue after she endured an attack. I imagine you are licensed. How in depth is the forms to get it? If you're insane they should know.
@2433006guy Agreed, but according to Liberals and the other fuckheads on here a dead/raped, but disarmed woman is BETTER than an alive/not raped but armed woman. Jesus I had to go through a fair amount of bullshit just to be able to carry my Glock in a holster on the damn RANGE, let alone on the street
A woman is bettor off alive knowing she killed a rapist then dead in an ally.
Situation: You’re alone and a homicidal criminal brakes into you’re home. TIME IS YOU’RE ENEMY, dialling 911 takes seconds and help may take up to an hour. The gun under you’re pillow is going to be you’re best friend because it is the difference between life and death.
@tapoutcampion111 So? Remember one of the Primary rules to firearm safety? Never rely on the mechanical safety. Is it a plus to have it on? Maybe, then again if you have your finger out of the trigger-well and the muzzle in a safe direction, in practice you should not need the safety.
@InfoDav Can you use a firearm to protect yourself from a maniac wielding any of the items above to include a firearm? Yes. Can you hunt for food with a firearm? Yes. Can you have a good time with the firearm at the range? Yes. Can you collect firearms? Yes.
what if men one day also adopted the idea that they should carry a gun to defend themselves against paranoid women who would shoot men for merely walking in the street.......
@CRTV1982 I said "When I see clips like this I realise that the US has a collective suicide pact. Ban firearms, all of them. You really don't need them"
You hissed "I would much rather ban little snivelling babies like you who want the government to ban everything they find too 'scary'."
I'm a soldier, so I don't find guns scary. However, the children in Dunblane and Columbine probably found them scary. Civies do not need guns.
@UrukEngineer Dude, I did time in the Army too. Civies do need firearms to protect themselves from criminals. Being a Soldier you should know better. You want to know what Dunblane and Columbine were that made them the target for those shooters? "Gun-Free-Zones", that is right GUN CONTROL created those enviroments. You claim that we have a "suicide-pact", it is everywhere with gun control that has the suicide pact because they have put themselves at the mercy of criminals.
@CRTV1982 Your argument in favour of gun control might be more convincing if it weren't for the fact that the statistical evidence clearly shows that gun control reduces overall fatalities from violent crime.
The US constitutional right to bear arms is a great way to ensure that King George III does not get back into power. However, I think it is safe to say that is not going to happen.
@UrukEngineer Actually it does not. Did gun control stop the cartels in Mexico? No. Why is it that in the US the most violent places are those with the most stringent gun control laws? Gun control does not work, that is why. The Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms was considered by our FOUNDERS to PRE-DATE our Independence. It was there so the GOVERNMENT would NOT have a MONOPOLY on the Arms. The believed Self-Defense to be God-Given, that NO GOVERNMENT can take away.
@CRTV1982 Mate, there's no point SHOUTING at me. The evidence clearly shows that where guns are freely available, fights prove fatal that would otherwise result in a serious, though non-fatal injury.
@UrukEngineer Seriously, you consider that shouting? The caps are to highlight key words. As for your theory, that is not the case either. Actually in areas with more firearms fights are LESS likely to occur. And the numbers show that. Kennesaw, GA passed a law requiring every household to have a firearm and guess what crime across the board not only made major drops but stayed down. Moreover, every area where RTC laws were enacted ALWAYS had doom and gloom stories from the media and the
@UrukEngineer gun control lobbies told tales of how the "blood would flow on the streets". You know the "shoot out at fender benders" predictions. After the laws were enacted in those areas, the crime rates (to include handgun violence) dropped and stayed down. Here is where you are mislead by the media because after NONE of those doom and gloom stories materialized ONLY ONE reporter BEGRUDGINGLY said: "Nothing has happened". After all this the ONLY real argument the Brady Campaign can try
@UrukEngineer is "do you feel comfortable knowing the guy beside you may have a handgun on them?" Even that argument is flawed. One, if they are a criminal they will carry no matter what the laws are. Two, I would much rather have my pistol with me LEGALLY than have than have everyone else FORCEFULLY disarmed because someone thinks that a crazy person being armed legally is somehow worse than them being armed illegally. Three, the LAST thing you should do is legislate on feelings.
@CRTV1982 You say that "[the right to ]...Self-Defense to be God-Given". Please specify where in the bible it says that you should have firearms.
"the LAST thing you should do is legislate on feelings" yet your pro-gun argument is based solely on emotion.
Compare the statistics of violent death, gun and knife between the US and UK. Neither country is more peaceful than the other. 42 people were shot dead in the UK in 2008, In 2007, guns were used in 12,632 killings in the US.
@DREwestcoast Calling me "stupid.." hardly strengthens your argument.
Did you actually read the evidence I presented? Try not to get all emotional about it and read-up on the data. The FACTS are that national gun control simply does reduce the number of guns in circulation. This reduces the number of fatalities.
@UrukEngineer gun control reduces the LEGAL amount of guns in circulation, a criminal doesn't have a harder time getting a weapon because of these laws, that's just BS, look at washington, with their total gun ban, they became the murder capital while the rest of the nation's crime rate declined, you have presented no legit argument, only misleading stats, I'm guessing you still have a totally rational explanation to this as well?
@DREwestcoast Mate, you need to be less US-parochial. Look at other countries. In the UK, gun ownership is not seen as a "right". Very few people can legitimately own guns. Ammunition (especially handgun/rifle natures) is very hard to come by...because the weapons that use them are so scarce legitimately. Our criminals have to import it - risky and very expensive. Anti-gun legislation works - but all States have to have it to be effective.
@UrukEngineer Hence, "Shall Not be Infringed". Governments have the ability to INFRINGE on the RIGHTS but they can NEVER, take them. The Second AoA made it ILLEGAL under Constitutional Law for the Government to place restrictions on the OWNERSHIP and CARRY of Arms.
@Nilguiri Please the only fuckwits I see on this page are gun control nazis like you. Then again, what should I expect from someone who's country sided with Hitler during WWII. You guys still have not gotten over your fetish for fascism have you now?
In nearly all areas of the US, save a few, and don't get me started, the common populace believes it is overtly unacceptable for authorites to covey a message that potential violent crime victims should automatically submit in robotic fashion to the will of their attackers. Such a paradigm reflects inhumanity, an unethical philosophy and obvious incompotence.
@Robobeast76 That's probably true in the end but our justice system is MUCH, BETTER. In some countries in the EU, a confession under coercion is almost always admisable, and the right of self preservation in face of violent behavior towards an unprovoking party is SEVERELY LIMITED as compared with the US. Since such pre determined rules of law are detestable I'll take my chances since most of the time I won't even need a gun in the US unless I travel in a car alot or go in bad areas at night.
America - citizen shooting citizen in the face more frequently than ANY other nation on earth, including the Middle East, North Korea, China, India AND Afghanistan. Any person that thinks a bunch of untrained, undisciplined fools with pop-guns will stand against a modern committed army should BE committed - to a lunatic hospital. If America continues to listen to deluded gun freaks and the religiously afflicted it will end-up like Afghanistan. Remove STUPIDITY, before stupidity removes humanity
@Robobeast76 Yes because looking at Britain-Gun deaths have risen, assaults have risen, rapes have risen, all other forms of violent crime and theft have risen, why? Because they cannot defend themselves. In the US people can defend themselves, do I want Canada exactly like the states? No, personally I do not want to pay an extra $200 for an SBS, but I do support licensing, but that's it, no other limits on guns
@otester Not having guns in a society does not make it communist. I am against communism, it's a horrible way of running a society. Social Liberalism, read about it.
@wissn2112 Well here in Norway guns are not easily obtainable and police does not even carry guns. I would say that it have worked. We have way less gun crimes here than in the US, because it is hard to get guns.
@theAcidBlues In the US people can defend themselves....
Had Brevik been in the US in a non-gun free zone, casualties would have been minimal. Same with the Montreal Polytechnic shooting, Virginia Tech shooting etc
@308Sharpie how many massacres has been in the US? How many big massacres have been in Norway? non-gun free zone, what the fuck are you talking about? It is NOT legal to carry weapons in Norway, you are talking out of stupidity. In the US you just have to be a citizen, and you have by law a right to own a weapon that can potentially be used for so called "self defense". It is not the citizens job to protect themselves, it is the police, the state.
@theAcidBlues I was saying if a shooter decided to go on a rampage (Just as Brevik did) in an area where it was legal to have a gun, there would not have been that many casualties. Yes America has had more but that's because any idiot with a drivers license can buy a gun (Which is why I support licensing, I am Canadian BTW, we have licensing and other forms of gun control) Have you noticed most massacres in the US have been in "safe" gun free zones? Yeah gun control works real well.....
@theAcidBlues "It is not the citizens job to protect themselves, it is the police, the state" Tell that to the Supreme Courts of both the US and Canada (Yet Canada still doesn't allow us to effectively protect ourselves) who have said it is our responsibility to protect ourselves, not the police. So when someone breaks into your home and tries to rape your wife (If you're a guy, if you're a girl, you) or your daughter, or your mom, or tries to kill any of the above, are you going to ONLY CONT
@theAcidBlues Call 911? How long will it take for them to get to your house? 10+ mins? Plenty of time to beat, rape or murder you and your family. Call 911 and die right? It's idiots like you that make these laws and then have crimes go up dramatically because only the criminals then have guns. Guns in TRAINED hands are what protects society, not NO guns
@308Sharpie I think it is best you just shut up. Brevik was dressed as a police man and attacked at a summer camp, taking place on an island. When police arrived Brevik surrendered peacefully, he wanted to get caught. Killing Brevik would be an insanely dumb move which would have spread a lot more fear, the fear of not knowing if this was a lone wolf massacre or a plot set up by a terror group. Besides it recently came out the Breivik has been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.
@theAcidBlues Nah I will keep talking, and if there had been people who were armed on the island he wouldn't have been able to kill as many.
Just a few hours ago Virginia Tech was attacked again, 2 killed, one is speculated to be the gunman while the other was a police officer. I bet the "empty holster' campaign will now gain some validity.
Your point? He was a crazy fucker, we already know that
@308Sharpie Holy crap Sharpie! Just came to see who you are, and get your viewpoint on things as a fellow Canadian. Sound like the kind we need more of. Like you, I support licensing, but thats all. Hey, if I'm crazy or even just nuts, refuse to license me. WTF is this? Police are responsible for protecting us? So we just sit and accept, abuses, rapes, thefts etc. until the police arrive? Murder too? Keep up the good fight friend.
@terrybeb They should have an obligation to protect the citizens in their country. If the Supreme Court has ruled that, it just shows how retarded your politicians are.
@Faerlon123 I could not agree more with your statement....unfortunately that is the way it is. Only the police and the criminals are allowed to carry guns....... law abiding citizens are just for target practice it seems.
@terrybeb I live in a country were guns are very restricted. You have to have been a member of a gun club who shoots in tournaments for at least 6 months before you can own one, plus you need to have a secure locker or safe for them, and still after 6 months you can only buy 9mm guns. We have totally different approach to it here, because of our culture, and the result is the police don't even have guns equipped, because they never need to. We have maybe 1-2 gun homicides a year.
@Faerlon123 All my guns are locked in Safes and trigger locked ammo separately locked. limits on magazine rounds 5 in rifle 10 in pistol. ATT permits to transport guns to the range to use. Restricted permits for pistols and other assault rifles. I can go on.... non of that will help if I snap. Or anyone else for that matter. I will give up all my firearms when one jumps up off the table and shoots someone. A gun is a tool. It's Personal Responsibly that matters.
@308Sharpie precisely.,.. can you believe there is a female survivor of the polytechnique who launched a gun control crusade after this happened? She uses the emotionally-charged subject to obscure any discussion and glean sympathy from the gullible public here.
@DREwestcoast Yeah, they were just knee jerk reactions, they need to think about something is, criminals will always have guns, the government and those anti-gun idiots need to decide whether or not the citizens should be able to protect themselves to stay alive
@FreedomIsAbsolute because criminals don't give a shit about what's legal and what's not. They like that guns are illegal because they don't have to worry about a decent citizen fighting back with a gun when they try to rob them. Dude, arguing with that bitch is like arguing with a mental retard, you'll never win.
@FreedomIsAbsolute wow you are like 5 steps behind, buddy. the next dictator? we already have a dictator. his name is obama. guns won't help us right now. we need an organized think tank. don't vote republican. don't vote democrat. the two party system is a scam. vote independent! oh, and guns are bad, m kay?
@FreedomIsAbsolute sir! forgive me sir! the revolution is on it's way! let us bring forth our brown besses! grab your nearest musket and follow me with cannons and gun powder! damn, i had no idea it was the 1700s all over again!
@FreedomIsAbsolute Yea, some people are just too stupid to understand though. I didn't feel like doing their homework for them. Anyone with a working brain can understand that if you make guns illegal, only the law abiding citizens will suffer. Criminals break the law for a living, so they don't care about more gun laws. Here is a video for people to see, it's a parody, but it's 100% true. watch?v=ngsKzdKNAmo
@XITroll13 yeah totally, some people are just too stupid to realize that walking around with a gun and being intimidating isn't actually that cool. just because you want to be macho and let all your buddies know how "cool" and "tough" you are cause you have a gun, doesn't mean you have to chew me out for my opinion. i didn't come here to make people angry... i want to hear your guys's understanding of it. i used to be pro guns when i was republican and retarded.
@doctordoctordocism So u went from Repub. to freeloader? Good job, scum. For the record, I carry my gun everywhere I go and nobody but me knows it, so there's another 1 of your arguments shot down. I don't try to intimidate or act cool for anyone, I carry to protect myself from freeloading, welfare receiving, drug addicted democrap thugs. Carrying has nothing to do with being macho. Look at who votes Dem. People that want welfare and everything provided for them by the govt. for free. Scum bags.
This video is a serious message. It is astounding how many immature fools there are out there who can only focus & comment on Katey being blonde and/or by association stupid. Why don't some people ever grow up?
@doctordoctordocism Are you one of these nut jobs who thinks only criminals should be able to carry guns? If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.
@XITroll13 why do most injuries due to guns occur in the gun owner's own household? why do countries that disallow gun ownership have way less crime? i understand if you wanna go shoot mr. squirrel and cook him up for dinner with your sister, but let's not ruin things for everyone.
@doctordoctordocism Listen you shitheel, I'm not some back woods redneck sister banger, sorry to disappoint you. As far as lower crime rate is concerned, that's complete farcical BS. Look at the UK, after they banned guns, gun crimes went up. People like you regurgitating and spreading false information do more damage to our freedoms than anything else. Also, the gun injuries in gun owner household is BS also, I've never seen that statistic. Do your homework and form your own opinion kid.
Blonde, not stupid, and HOT!
degenret01 1 week ago
I'm sooooooo glad to see you have a shotgun, not some sissy pepperspray! :D
SongOfTheEveningSun 1 week ago
Cars kill more people. Remember Registration leads to confiscation which leads to oppression. Look at Turkey, Germany, any place that has confiscated guns in the past has turned on it's own people. The most pro-advocacy gun group are Jewish. There is a historical reason for this. The second amendment in the States was to allow average citizens to guarantee their freedom from an oppressive government. The founding fathers knew this to be true, as they just fled from an oppressive King.
terrybeb 1 week ago
Comment removed
terrybeb 1 week ago
@Epicaq cause your 14 and retarded....LOL
terrybeb 1 week ago
Well, thinking you need to have the firepower of an army, isn't exactly self-defence. Self-defence is when someone attacks you, and you defend yourself against their attacks. Having a gun at that time, might save your life, but what about all the situations where people aren't threatened on their life, but decide they can shoot people anyway? Gun-nuts are basicly saying it's ok to sacrifice 11000 people a year, just so they can keep their FAMAS. Sad logic.
Faerlon123 1 week ago
@Faerlon123 well put!
larzsurf 1 week ago
@Faerlon123 Exactly when has a civilian FAMAS ever been used in the commission of a crime in either the USA or in Canada (as this is a Canadian video). Which of the over 9 million legally owned firearms in Canada have been used to commit a crime. A percentage will do, backed up by Stats Canada plz. I believe in proper Vetting/background checks of an individual but most if not all criminals will not be legally obtaining anything.
terrybeb 1 week ago
@terrybeb I was not talking about the individual in this video specifically. I'm not stupid, i'm not saying everyone who owns guns just go out and shoot random people. I'm just saying the liability of allowing anyone, practically anyone, own weapons outweighs the positive aspects of it. If you allow nice, law-abiding citizens to have weapons, you are also allowing psychopathic,sociopathic serial-killers the opportunity aswell. And that's not a good thing.
Faerlon123 1 week ago
@Faerlon123 Your logic as well intentioned as it is....is flawed. The criminal element already have the guns. Only law abiding people obey the laws. So the responsible people stay unarmed. In a perfect world I would agree. Norway shooting in July 2011 for example. How well did that go.....In Florida the first to issue CCW the crime rate dropped 70% overnight. The bad guys didn't know who would be shooting back anymore. Check out the gun laws in Canada. Very strict as well. Doesn't help.
terrybeb 1 week ago
@terrybeb My logic is still irrefutable. If the USA had a better culture of weaponhandling, it's true, you wouldn't have avoided Virginia Tech and all these ghastly episodes. but you would avoid 11000 gun homicides a year. Terror episodes like Virginia Tech and Columbine are just made more possible with gun laws like the ones America have, especially in a country that's growing more and more economically challenged. If the gun laws in USA are so helpful, why doesn't it help?
Faerlon123 1 week ago
@Faerlon123 It has that's the point. Homicide rates have actually gone down. It's not perfect for sure. Nothing is that's my point. People kill People, it's sad but it's a fact. Ok, would you be scared if you saw me on the street with a gun at my side. How about if I had a hammer on my tool belt. Probably not right? Be honest...... I could kill you quicker with that hammer...Why because you weren't prepared for it. Do you have care insurance? Why? Are you that dangerous of a driver?
terrybeb 1 week ago
@terrybeb Ok nothings perfect. I agree to that. But making the problem worse by letting more and more people have guns is not the way to IMPROVE the problem. And equating car insurance with allowing people to own and carry weapons is total bullshit. Car insurance is a way to make sure you don't have to pay the full amount if someone crashes into you. If you trust millions of citizens, owning and carrying weapons, be my guest, but I don't even trust a cop with them, neither should I.
Faerlon123 1 week ago
good work, love the vids keep it up!
EBNighttRain 2 weeks ago
I will certainly take charge of the problem before the cop eats half his doughnut,and they will clean up the bad guys blood,NOT MINE
TheBakerman55 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I would hope that we all now realize, Libs included, that the gun reg did not work, did not save anyone, and in fact uselessly diverted billions which could have been utilized to fight ACTUAL gun crime, not harass farmers, hunters, and sport shooters. I would hope that we also now realize that it is time for Canada to support and allow a law abiding citizen's right to defend themselves and their families from violent criminal elements of society. CCW LICENSES FOR LAW ABIDING CANADIANS NOW!!!
RAVENBOYbc 2 weeks ago
Some of the comments on your vid just reinforce your need to be armed! An unarmed woman is just a victim in waiting..
Buckaroo1973 2 weeks ago
Remington 870? Is that a registered SBS? Wow. lol xDDD
gunfan50bmg 2 weeks ago
Shut up and show us you´re tits!
TheBAYAZ123 2 weeks ago
Give me the damn shotgun before you shoot yourself! And make me a damn sandwich!
AdrianCto96 3 weeks ago
Give up your shotgun, pick up a frying pan...and go and make us a sandwich!
DRAKO9764 3 weeks ago
Lol I come across your videos from time to time.. I like them.. Keep up the good work.. Spread the truth..
josh11915 3 weeks ago
Easier access to guns makes people use them more often. That's a fact. Fuck guns, fuck them up their asses.
Epicaq 4 weeks ago
@Epicaq the only ass fucking that'll happen is on the part of the armed criminal while he fucks your sorry unarmed ass..
DREwestcoast 4 weeks ago
@DREwestcoast Rawr! xD
Epicaq 4 weeks ago
@DREwestcoast No it won't. Because it's illegal to carry arms here. Duh!
Epicaq 2 weeks ago
@Epicaq ignorant preppy faggot
DREwestcoast 2 weeks ago
@DREwestcoast Oh, someone's hurt. Lawl
Epicaq 2 weeks ago
@Epicaq Ignorance and pure stupidity!
AV8R4HM 2 weeks ago
@InfoDav you can target shoot with a gun, hunt, or just collect.,.
DREwestcoast 4 weeks ago
Yeh cause a shotgun will help you when you are out clubbing in your skin tight dress with tiny handbag and you walk down a dark alley and get taken from behind. Guns only escalate situations unless in a fortified powerful position. Learn a self defense like Krav Maga and youll be fine even if they have a gun itll soon become yours.
1stNightingale 1 month ago
@1stNightingale Lol, now who,s watching too much TV... that's a good way to end up shot dead in an alley..
DREwestcoast 4 weeks ago
@DREwestcoast Lol i actually dont watch TV at all and i train in Krav Maga and am in the Australian Defence Force and i have had many encounters with people in dark alleys. Most of the time talking your way out of it is best. But please tell me where a girl out on the down would saddle her shotgun?
1stNightingale 4 weeks ago
@1stNightingale obviously the girl doesn't carry a fucking shotgun for self-defense, she illustrated the point with it, I thought it was pretty easy to understand
DREwestcoast 4 weeks ago
@DREwestcoast Why doesn't she have a side arm? That would be a more realistic display of what is capable rather than brandishing it like shes tough shit. Just dislike gun totting madness. I know its uses but really alot of the time you dont need it because most wont give you the chance to use it. Men attacking woman do so from behind or they wait til they are up close to start the threat. Pulling out a gun can complicate things when a swift kick to the go-nads will take him down.
1stNightingale 4 weeks ago
@1stNightingale I know, I'm with you on this, sometimes people forget the scaring power of a warning shot, I'm not for gun nuts either, as far as from behind, I think women would make contact with their baby-looking glock 36 rather quick if some shady guy was following her, the attack scenario you're speaking of rarely happens in broad daylight anyway, but I do get your point.
DREwestcoast 4 weeks ago
@DREwestcoast Yeh but most guys wont walk behind someone they will lie in wait for an ambush. Just what studies on rapists say. so being able to defend against a hair grab or a bear hug is the best.
1stNightingale 4 weeks ago
@DREwestcoast NEVER, NEVER NEVER, I repeat NEVER fire a warning. The only time you should be firing is when your life in danger and when it is you take the shot that stops that threat.
I don't know who told you to fire warning shots but there is not a justifiable homicide course or CCW class that in the world that will tell you to get fire a warning shot.
wtfdudenotcool101 3 weeks ago
@wtfdudenotcool101 if you're outnumbered it can repel the assailants, but I do agree that it's not very practical in most circumstances.
DREwestcoast 3 weeks ago
oh, stupid war in the comments, shut up and make me a sandwich.
TheBlazordude 1 month ago
@TheBlazordude Its not a war just ignorant people who fail to make a valid point.
Radion561 1 month ago
it is stupid how U.S morons like this chick ALL have a fucking gun in there closet, and use it when they have a bad feeling and feel unsafe.
If i walked behind a girl in america and didnt notice (or towards her) i can GAURANTEE id get peppersprayed, or "RAPE WHISTLE" or shot, because she watched to many movies.
Fucking america.
biggestFFXIfan 1 month ago
@biggestFFXIfan O please you ignorant fuck. None of what you typed is even close to true. Why dont you VISIT AMERICA before you pull shit out your ass about it. Dont take everything you get from people about america being full of idiots truley my friend. That just shows your ignorance. You have never been here. Yes there is some ignorant people here but those kinds of people are everywhere. There is a HELL OF ALOT LESS then you could ever imagine. When seconds count the police are minutes away
Radion561 1 month ago
@Radion561 your an idiot. it is true, girls jump to conclusions. ;fact.
biggestFFXIfan 1 month ago
@biggestFFXIfan Once again you dont live here. How can you believe something you have never seen? Once again that shows you ignorance and your incompetence to make a valid point. Girls do jump to conclusions all of them do. But 99% of them are not like that. Where did you get this information? Larsjake is right you do watch to much T.V. Every over seas station rubs off American's as dumbass hilljacks. Which is not true.
Radion561 1 month ago
@biggestFFXIfan I think you watch too much TV.
larsjake 1 month ago
@biggestFFXIfan Actually she is not American..... She is Canadian. And a pretty level headed one at that. Also, it is law that Canadian women have the right to ATC (authorization to Carry) if under threat from a dangerous spouse with permission from the CFO (Canadian firearms Officer). THe problem is they have never given permission for self defense even though it is a charter right.......
terrybeb 1 week ago
The world would have been much better off if guns were never invented. And the "I may be blonde, but I am not stupid" part just kind of reinforces the stereotype by mentioning it...
CarrieBeary360 1 month ago
@CarrieBeary360 If guns had never been invented then dictators and tyrants would be controlling us all. You are a delusional idiotic liberal moron!
ruj1970 1 month ago
@ruj1970 lolsyoufunny.
CarrieBeary360 1 month ago
@CarrieBeary360 It's the truth you moron!
ruj1970 1 month ago
@ruj1970 How could they rule us without force or weapons? Im all for gun ownership and the right of a well armed militia to protect the free state. As I am part of a militia. But your comment does not make sense.
Radion561 1 month ago
@Radion561 You are a braindead idiot! Just go shoot yourself please.
ruj1970 1 month ago
@ruj1970 Very mature. All I ask is how can a dictatorship rule without weapons. That is how the spread fear is it not? You said if guns were never invented then dictators and tyrants would rule us all. How could that be possible? Do they not use guns to come to power? Perhaps you are the Idiot here.
Radion561 1 month ago
@Radion561 Tyrants rules the masses long before guns were invented you moron.
ruj1970 1 month ago
@ruj1970 Yep and we still rebelled back then did we not?
Radion561 1 month ago
haha u need a condom for self defence :)
jtdc86 1 month ago
she should just clean my dishes
MrThebigcheese123 1 month ago
@nick199009 that was nice LOL
theroyalgrapefruit 1 month ago
Good video, if every home had a shotgun in it, would you become a burglar??
drumsalltime 1 month ago
YES YOU ARE!
The way you're holding that gun. Girl, you wanna kill yourself?
Furthermore, before you act like a donkey, look at the statistics for the EU. With a few exceptions (UK and Belgium), generally, there's strict gun control, which results in low violent crime. In the UK, there is a lot of gang violence, and Belgium is like the Rifle River. SO MANY GUNS TO AND FRO. Also, look at Japan. In 2006, 616 homicides in the whole country and 240 firearm crimes.
weurRTG 1 month ago
@weurRTG actually I have seen all the stats and it proves that firearms, especially in conceal and carry use deter crime. I guess your an expert on safe gun handling? Do you hold any courses I could take?
terrybeb 1 month ago 2
shes not even holding up the shotgun LOL
snowmantuna 1 month ago
@snowmantuna How about you look just left of the stock of the gun...............
Radion561 1 month ago
@Radion561 how about you stoping being a douchebag and get a life
snowmantuna 1 month ago
@snowmantuna How about you worry about yourself and stop dropping pathetic immature insults at other people over the internet.
Radion561 1 month ago
So 13 people prefer an asshole over vagina. I'd say that could qualify as gay.
norevelation 1 month ago
I want this woman to be the mother of my children.
Fuck, I mean "sweet video!" stupid autocorrect...
licanthroppe 1 month ago
I know my rights, make me a sandwich woman.
nick199009 1 month ago 26
Ho and adopt the U.S.A's 2nd Amendment. The less gun control we have the better it is for Canada.
CanadaMadness 1 month ago
@CanadaMadness I have to agree with both your comments. Hope the government keeps the promise and disposes of the stupid, expensive B.S. that has cost us BILLIONS over the last 16 years. I'd rather have my daughter explain why she blew a potential rapist away, than have to visit her in the hospital or morgue after she endured an attack. I imagine you are licensed. How in depth is the forms to get it? If you're insane they should know.
2433006guy 1 month ago
@2433006guy Agreed, but according to Liberals and the other fuckheads on here a dead/raped, but disarmed woman is BETTER than an alive/not raped but armed woman. Jesus I had to go through a fair amount of bullshit just to be able to carry my Glock in a holster on the damn RANGE, let alone on the street
308Sharpie 1 month ago
A woman is bettor off alive knowing she killed a rapist then dead in an ally.
Situation: You’re alone and a homicidal criminal brakes into you’re home. TIME IS YOU’RE ENEMY, dialling 911 takes seconds and help may take up to an hour. The gun under you’re pillow is going to be you’re best friend because it is the difference between life and death.
CanadaMadness 1 month ago
XyNTa
IseeaPedo111 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO U WANNA HAVE ANAL WITH ME??
MrPolishadam 2 months ago 22
@tapoutcampion111 So? Remember one of the Primary rules to firearm safety? Never rely on the mechanical safety. Is it a plus to have it on? Maybe, then again if you have your finger out of the trigger-well and the muzzle in a safe direction, in practice you should not need the safety.
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@rick3dx Spot on. Katie is very attractive while Sarah Brady looks like Skeletor.
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@InfoDav Can you use a firearm to protect yourself from a maniac wielding any of the items above to include a firearm? Yes. Can you hunt for food with a firearm? Yes. Can you have a good time with the firearm at the range? Yes. Can you collect firearms? Yes.
CRTV1982 2 months ago
you're blonde and stupid
JCWrace 2 months ago
I do not want to live on this planet anymore..
Drummerdrok666 2 months ago
what if men one day also adopted the idea that they should carry a gun to defend themselves against paranoid women who would shoot men for merely walking in the street.......
o0POSH0o 2 months ago
LOL doin in right in AMERRRRICA!!! fucken retards
IngloriousButter 2 months ago
man, my grandpa would LOVE this video
BRINGMETHEHORlZ0N 2 months ago
@UrukEngineer I would much rather ban little snivelling babies like you who want the government to ban everything they find too "scary".
CRTV1982 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CRTV1982 I said "When I see clips like this I realise that the US has a collective suicide pact. Ban firearms, all of them. You really don't need them"
You hissed "I would much rather ban little snivelling babies like you who want the government to ban everything they find too 'scary'."
I'm a soldier, so I don't find guns scary. However, the children in Dunblane and Columbine probably found them scary. Civies do not need guns.
UrukEngineer 2 months ago
@UrukEngineer Dude, I did time in the Army too. Civies do need firearms to protect themselves from criminals. Being a Soldier you should know better. You want to know what Dunblane and Columbine were that made them the target for those shooters? "Gun-Free-Zones", that is right GUN CONTROL created those enviroments. You claim that we have a "suicide-pact", it is everywhere with gun control that has the suicide pact because they have put themselves at the mercy of criminals.
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@CRTV1982 Your argument in favour of gun control might be more convincing if it weren't for the fact that the statistical evidence clearly shows that gun control reduces overall fatalities from violent crime.
The US constitutional right to bear arms is a great way to ensure that King George III does not get back into power. However, I think it is safe to say that is not going to happen.
UrukEngineer 2 months ago
@UrukEngineer Actually it does not. Did gun control stop the cartels in Mexico? No. Why is it that in the US the most violent places are those with the most stringent gun control laws? Gun control does not work, that is why. The Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms was considered by our FOUNDERS to PRE-DATE our Independence. It was there so the GOVERNMENT would NOT have a MONOPOLY on the Arms. The believed Self-Defense to be God-Given, that NO GOVERNMENT can take away.
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@CRTV1982 Mate, there's no point SHOUTING at me. The evidence clearly shows that where guns are freely available, fights prove fatal that would otherwise result in a serious, though non-fatal injury.
UrukEngineer 2 months ago
@UrukEngineer Seriously, you consider that shouting? The caps are to highlight key words. As for your theory, that is not the case either. Actually in areas with more firearms fights are LESS likely to occur. And the numbers show that. Kennesaw, GA passed a law requiring every household to have a firearm and guess what crime across the board not only made major drops but stayed down. Moreover, every area where RTC laws were enacted ALWAYS had doom and gloom stories from the media and the
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@UrukEngineer gun control lobbies told tales of how the "blood would flow on the streets". You know the "shoot out at fender benders" predictions. After the laws were enacted in those areas, the crime rates (to include handgun violence) dropped and stayed down. Here is where you are mislead by the media because after NONE of those doom and gloom stories materialized ONLY ONE reporter BEGRUDGINGLY said: "Nothing has happened". After all this the ONLY real argument the Brady Campaign can try
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@UrukEngineer is "do you feel comfortable knowing the guy beside you may have a handgun on them?" Even that argument is flawed. One, if they are a criminal they will carry no matter what the laws are. Two, I would much rather have my pistol with me LEGALLY than have than have everyone else FORCEFULLY disarmed because someone thinks that a crazy person being armed legally is somehow worse than them being armed illegally. Three, the LAST thing you should do is legislate on feelings.
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@CRTV1982 You say that "[the right to ]...Self-Defense to be God-Given". Please specify where in the bible it says that you should have firearms.
"the LAST thing you should do is legislate on feelings" yet your pro-gun argument is based solely on emotion.
Compare the statistics of violent death, gun and knife between the US and UK. Neither country is more peaceful than the other. 42 people were shot dead in the UK in 2008, In 2007, guns were used in 12,632 killings in the US.
UrukEngineer 1 month ago
@UrukEngineer
That's because the UK doesn't have as many black people as the US.
RunThemAll 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RunThemAll "That's because the UK doesn't have as many black people as the US."
Dude, seriously?
UrukEngineer 1 month ago
@UrukEngineer Some of the people in that statistic needed killing. Just sayin'...
45CaliberCure 1 month ago
@UrukEngineer How about the constitution which is the law of the land? stupid..
as far as your statistics, they don't account for legal vs illegal distinctions, which means they can't be used to support your pitiful argument
DREwestcoast 1 month ago
@DREwestcoast Calling me "stupid.." hardly strengthens your argument.
Did you actually read the evidence I presented? Try not to get all emotional about it and read-up on the data. The FACTS are that national gun control simply does reduce the number of guns in circulation. This reduces the number of fatalities.
UrukEngineer 4 weeks ago
@UrukEngineer gun control reduces the LEGAL amount of guns in circulation, a criminal doesn't have a harder time getting a weapon because of these laws, that's just BS, look at washington, with their total gun ban, they became the murder capital while the rest of the nation's crime rate declined, you have presented no legit argument, only misleading stats, I'm guessing you still have a totally rational explanation to this as well?
DREwestcoast 4 weeks ago
@DREwestcoast Mate, you need to be less US-parochial. Look at other countries. In the UK, gun ownership is not seen as a "right". Very few people can legitimately own guns. Ammunition (especially handgun/rifle natures) is very hard to come by...because the weapons that use them are so scarce legitimately. Our criminals have to import it - risky and very expensive. Anti-gun legislation works - but all States have to have it to be effective.
UrukEngineer 4 weeks ago
@UrukEngineer Hence, "Shall Not be Infringed". Governments have the ability to INFRINGE on the RIGHTS but they can NEVER, take them. The Second AoA made it ILLEGAL under Constitutional Law for the Government to place restrictions on the OWNERSHIP and CARRY of Arms.
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@Nilguiri Please the only fuckwits I see on this page are gun control nazis like you. Then again, what should I expect from someone who's country sided with Hitler during WWII. You guys still have not gotten over your fetish for fascism have you now?
CRTV1982 2 months ago
@CRTV1982
which "you guys" are you talking about, Cletus? I didn't side with Hitler during the war you moron.
Nilguiri 2 months ago
@Nilguiri No, but you guys are supporting Hitler's policies like you wished he'd won.
CRTV1982 2 months ago
I can't tell if this is supposed to be ironic...
DickHead69able 2 months ago
Stalin Hitler and Mao all agree that gun control works.
ComradeOblivious 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You know who else is pro gun control? Rapists, burglars, and murderers.
BlindMaphisto 2 months ago 2
Comment removed
BlindMaphisto 2 months ago
dyed blonde
repoman174 2 months ago
In nearly all areas of the US, save a few, and don't get me started, the common populace believes it is overtly unacceptable for authorites to covey a message that potential violent crime victims should automatically submit in robotic fashion to the will of their attackers. Such a paradigm reflects inhumanity, an unethical philosophy and obvious incompotence.
ericr530 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@Robobeast76 That's probably true in the end but our justice system is MUCH, BETTER. In some countries in the EU, a confession under coercion is almost always admisable, and the right of self preservation in face of violent behavior towards an unprovoking party is SEVERELY LIMITED as compared with the US. Since such pre determined rules of law are detestable I'll take my chances since most of the time I won't even need a gun in the US unless I travel in a car alot or go in bad areas at night.
ericr530 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
America - citizen shooting citizen in the face more frequently than ANY other nation on earth, including the Middle East, North Korea, China, India AND Afghanistan. Any person that thinks a bunch of untrained, undisciplined fools with pop-guns will stand against a modern committed army should BE committed - to a lunatic hospital. If America continues to listen to deluded gun freaks and the religiously afflicted it will end-up like Afghanistan. Remove STUPIDITY, before stupidity removes humanity
evidenceonlythanx 2 months ago
@evidenceonlythanx
What's to stop police from doing whatever they please in N Korea, Middle East, China, etc... oh, that's right, nothing.
subg88 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evidenceonlythanx Then you should remove yourself . Worry about your own country .
mwillblade 2 months ago
Blonde and stupid.
3rdAutisticCuckoo 2 months ago
I have seen this video about 200 times now, I find is so incredibly amusing every time xD
MrDoomperson 2 months ago 5
A society where there are lots of guns - much safer, NOT
Robobeast76 2 months ago
@Robobeast76
Freedom != Safety.
otester 2 months ago
@Robobeast76 Yes because looking at Britain-Gun deaths have risen, assaults have risen, rapes have risen, all other forms of violent crime and theft have risen, why? Because they cannot defend themselves. In the US people can defend themselves, do I want Canada exactly like the states? No, personally I do not want to pay an extra $200 for an SBS, but I do support licensing, but that's it, no other limits on guns
308Sharpie 1 month ago
NOTHING I HATE MORE THAN A FAKE BLONDE TAKING ABOUT THEMSELVES BEING BLONDE. you fail...
celticwarrior8181 2 months ago
Making me a sandwich...
...is every woman's right
I3ass0 2 months ago
@I3ass0 Not being as wannabe cool as you...
...is every nerds right
OutsiderTerritoryTV 2 months ago
your a fake blond :P
nlreeftank 2 months ago
"Give up my kitchen? Never. I'm Blonde and Stupid"
Fixed
xSaikusu 2 months ago
Blonde AND stupid.
leirgauk 2 months ago
Stupid blonde is a pleonasm...
fielderxei 2 months ago
Anyone who believes that more and more guns circulating in a society is a safe society is an idiot. Should not allowed any guns in the first place.
theAcidBlues 2 months ago
@theAcidBlues
Yeah, America should be more like Communist China!
otester 2 months ago
@otester Not having guns in a society does not make it communist. I am against communism, it's a horrible way of running a society. Social Liberalism, read about it.
theAcidBlues 2 months ago
@theAcidBlues And where has this worked? So who allows the ones who have criminal intent to have them?
wissn2112 2 months ago
@wissn2112 Well here in Norway guns are not easily obtainable and police does not even carry guns. I would say that it have worked. We have way less gun crimes here than in the US, because it is hard to get guns.
theAcidBlues 2 months ago
@theAcidBlues In the US people can defend themselves....
Had Brevik been in the US in a non-gun free zone, casualties would have been minimal. Same with the Montreal Polytechnic shooting, Virginia Tech shooting etc
308Sharpie 1 month ago
@308Sharpie how many massacres has been in the US? How many big massacres have been in Norway? non-gun free zone, what the fuck are you talking about? It is NOT legal to carry weapons in Norway, you are talking out of stupidity. In the US you just have to be a citizen, and you have by law a right to own a weapon that can potentially be used for so called "self defense". It is not the citizens job to protect themselves, it is the police, the state.
theAcidBlues 1 month ago
@theAcidBlues I was saying if a shooter decided to go on a rampage (Just as Brevik did) in an area where it was legal to have a gun, there would not have been that many casualties. Yes America has had more but that's because any idiot with a drivers license can buy a gun (Which is why I support licensing, I am Canadian BTW, we have licensing and other forms of gun control) Have you noticed most massacres in the US have been in "safe" gun free zones? Yeah gun control works real well.....
308Sharpie 1 month ago
@theAcidBlues "It is not the citizens job to protect themselves, it is the police, the state" Tell that to the Supreme Courts of both the US and Canada (Yet Canada still doesn't allow us to effectively protect ourselves) who have said it is our responsibility to protect ourselves, not the police. So when someone breaks into your home and tries to rape your wife (If you're a guy, if you're a girl, you) or your daughter, or your mom, or tries to kill any of the above, are you going to ONLY CONT
308Sharpie 1 month ago
@theAcidBlues Call 911? How long will it take for them to get to your house? 10+ mins? Plenty of time to beat, rape or murder you and your family. Call 911 and die right? It's idiots like you that make these laws and then have crimes go up dramatically because only the criminals then have guns. Guns in TRAINED hands are what protects society, not NO guns
308Sharpie 1 month ago
@theAcidBlues Oh, and one other thing, your police did a real good job killing Brevik before he shot 70+ people, oh wait.......
308Sharpie 1 month ago
@308Sharpie I think it is best you just shut up. Brevik was dressed as a police man and attacked at a summer camp, taking place on an island. When police arrived Brevik surrendered peacefully, he wanted to get caught. Killing Brevik would be an insanely dumb move which would have spread a lot more fear, the fear of not knowing if this was a lone wolf massacre or a plot set up by a terror group. Besides it recently came out the Breivik has been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.
theAcidBlues 1 month ago
@theAcidBlues Nah I will keep talking, and if there had been people who were armed on the island he wouldn't have been able to kill as many.
Just a few hours ago Virginia Tech was attacked again, 2 killed, one is speculated to be the gunman while the other was a police officer. I bet the "empty holster' campaign will now gain some validity.
Your point? He was a crazy fucker, we already know that
308Sharpie 1 month ago
@308Sharpie Holy crap Sharpie! Just came to see who you are, and get your viewpoint on things as a fellow Canadian. Sound like the kind we need more of. Like you, I support licensing, but thats all. Hey, if I'm crazy or even just nuts, refuse to license me. WTF is this? Police are responsible for protecting us? So we just sit and accept, abuses, rapes, thefts etc. until the police arrive? Murder too? Keep up the good fight friend.
2433006guy 1 month ago
@2433006guy When seconds count the Police are just minutes away.
Supreme Court has ruled that the Police have no obligation to protect.
terrybeb 1 month ago 5
@terrybeb They should have an obligation to protect the citizens in their country. If the Supreme Court has ruled that, it just shows how retarded your politicians are.
Faerlon123 1 week ago
Comment removed
terrybeb 1 week ago
@Faerlon123 I could not agree more with your statement....unfortunately that is the way it is. Only the police and the criminals are allowed to carry guns....... law abiding citizens are just for target practice it seems.
terrybeb 1 week ago
@terrybeb I live in a country were guns are very restricted. You have to have been a member of a gun club who shoots in tournaments for at least 6 months before you can own one, plus you need to have a secure locker or safe for them, and still after 6 months you can only buy 9mm guns. We have totally different approach to it here, because of our culture, and the result is the police don't even have guns equipped, because they never need to. We have maybe 1-2 gun homicides a year.
Faerlon123 1 week ago
@Faerlon123 All my guns are locked in Safes and trigger locked ammo separately locked. limits on magazine rounds 5 in rifle 10 in pistol. ATT permits to transport guns to the range to use. Restricted permits for pistols and other assault rifles. I can go on.... non of that will help if I snap. Or anyone else for that matter. I will give up all my firearms when one jumps up off the table and shoots someone. A gun is a tool. It's Personal Responsibly that matters.
terrybeb 1 week ago
@308Sharpie precisely.,.. can you believe there is a female survivor of the polytechnique who launched a gun control crusade after this happened? She uses the emotionally-charged subject to obscure any discussion and glean sympathy from the gullible public here.
DREwestcoast 1 month ago
@DREwestcoast Yeah, they were just knee jerk reactions, they need to think about something is, criminals will always have guns, the government and those anti-gun idiots need to decide whether or not the citizens should be able to protect themselves to stay alive
308Sharpie 1 month ago
tits or gtfo
Panu222 2 months ago
@Panu222 Are you blind?...
KoivuTheHab 2 months ago
gtfo blondie
timohabelenkov 2 months ago
@FreedomIsAbsolute you spelled genius wrong, genius.
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
Lol u guys are all retards for actually taking time and arguing Here. Makin me laugh lol
thahchad1987 2 months ago
@thahchad1987 lol true dat my nigger
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
@FreedomIsAbsolute because criminals don't give a shit about what's legal and what's not. They like that guns are illegal because they don't have to worry about a decent citizen fighting back with a gun when they try to rob them. Dude, arguing with that bitch is like arguing with a mental retard, you'll never win.
XITroll13 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FreedomIsAbsolute wow you are like 5 steps behind, buddy. the next dictator? we already have a dictator. his name is obama. guns won't help us right now. we need an organized think tank. don't vote republican. don't vote democrat. the two party system is a scam. vote independent! oh, and guns are bad, m kay?
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
Comment removed
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FreedomIsAbsolute sir! forgive me sir! the revolution is on it's way! let us bring forth our brown besses! grab your nearest musket and follow me with cannons and gun powder! damn, i had no idea it was the 1700s all over again!
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
Comment removed
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
@FreedomIsAbsolute Yea, some people are just too stupid to understand though. I didn't feel like doing their homework for them. Anyone with a working brain can understand that if you make guns illegal, only the law abiding citizens will suffer. Criminals break the law for a living, so they don't care about more gun laws. Here is a video for people to see, it's a parody, but it's 100% true. watch?v=ngsKzdKNAmo
XITroll13 2 months ago
@XITroll13 yeah totally, some people are just too stupid to realize that walking around with a gun and being intimidating isn't actually that cool. just because you want to be macho and let all your buddies know how "cool" and "tough" you are cause you have a gun, doesn't mean you have to chew me out for my opinion. i didn't come here to make people angry... i want to hear your guys's understanding of it. i used to be pro guns when i was republican and retarded.
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
@doctordoctordocism So u went from Repub. to freeloader? Good job, scum. For the record, I carry my gun everywhere I go and nobody but me knows it, so there's another 1 of your arguments shot down. I don't try to intimidate or act cool for anyone, I carry to protect myself from freeloading, welfare receiving, drug addicted democrap thugs. Carrying has nothing to do with being macho. Look at who votes Dem. People that want welfare and everything provided for them by the govt. for free. Scum bags.
XITroll13 2 months ago
@XITroll13 it is seriously unbelievable how clueless you are. i don't have time to argue with idiots.
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
@XITroll13 and i'm not democrap either. i'm independent. research your shit before choosing "a side".
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
I luv you! will you marry me?
ctford27 2 months ago
Why isn't this girls pussy in my mouth?
11mac11s 2 months ago
you got that right! with that shotgun a man 6'8 350 pounds dont stand a chance. against a 100 lb woman
O7ROADKING 2 months ago
this video is classic misogynist.
dolphinmattify 2 months ago
This video is a serious message. It is astounding how many immature fools there are out there who can only focus & comment on Katey being blonde and/or by association stupid. Why don't some people ever grow up?
Keep up the great work Katey!
mcpypr 2 months ago
uhhhhhhhhhhh what? are you one of these nut jobs that thinks everyone should be forced to carry around an ak-47?
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
@doctordoctordocism Are you one of these nut jobs who thinks only criminals should be able to carry guns? If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.
XITroll13 2 months ago
@XITroll13 why do most injuries due to guns occur in the gun owner's own household? why do countries that disallow gun ownership have way less crime? i understand if you wanna go shoot mr. squirrel and cook him up for dinner with your sister, but let's not ruin things for everyone.
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
@doctordoctordocism Listen you shitheel, I'm not some back woods redneck sister banger, sorry to disappoint you. As far as lower crime rate is concerned, that's complete farcical BS. Look at the UK, after they banned guns, gun crimes went up. People like you regurgitating and spreading false information do more damage to our freedoms than anything else. Also, the gun injuries in gun owner household is BS also, I've never seen that statistic. Do your homework and form your own opinion kid.
XITroll13 2 months ago
@XITroll13 alright buddy, if you wanna get all worked up over having the right to carry a dangerous wea