Added: 4 years ago
From: jeck1987
Views: 144,174
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (70)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • whoever posted this video is by far the biggest idiot on youtube

  • how bout the shot in real time first, THEN slow-mo... fucking douche

  • u owed me 1minute of life

  • If you need a slomotion camera, than it is NOT OBVIOUS, you god forsaken fools.

  • The dicision "no foul" was correct, since this shot was so close, that it was almost impossible to tell without having a slow-motion replay like we do. If the ref would've seen the foul, it would've been a correct decision. But if it's that hard to tell and you're in doubt, you have to decide on no foul.

  • fail ass vid

    

  • sad ass

  • what the fuck is this?

  • Thanks to the sharp eyes of Mikaela Tabb (referee). Congrats to Daryll Peach (England) for winning the 2007 World Pool Championship held in Araneta Coliseum.... Respect to Django.

  • Show the actual fucking shot. Goddamn.

  • what's that a shit vidio? -.- the same scene more and more and more....

  • I really couldn't tell for the first 73 replays, but after seeing it the 74th time, I could tell it was a foul. Excellent video!

  • It would be easier to judge if you showed the entire shot. Did the cue ball travel along the tangent line of the 3-ball or the 9-ball after contact? That will give you the answer to whether the hit was good or not.

  • bad hit definitely but very close

  • You can also tell by the way the cueball continues its path. Check youtube for a referee-quiz. Its a quiz with all kinds of problems like this and how to conclude whether this was a foul.

  • well both 3 and 9 are moving on the same frame

  • the 5 ball in the back is like bow chicka wah wahhh

  • LOL

    So many explanation, it`s nine first... The angle is ok with the hit

    LOL

  • hits the 9 first no question!

  • No.... if it had hit the nine ball first the nine ball would have taken a different trajectory. This video doesnt show the 3 ball ball moving first, because of the Framerate.. The 3 ball is moving first, but it isn't shown because it is moving so slowly.

    The 9 ball took the trajectory it should have, if the cue ball impacted the 3 first and then caromed into it.... i see no foul here.

  • @daleetMeh just pause at 0;03 u'll see that it clearly touched the 9

  • @daleetMeh Frame before contact, both balls still. Next frame, 9 moved, 3 still exactly same position. Next frame, both moved. Doesn't matter how slow the frame rate is, that's enough evidence.

  • @ProdigyKimXP No its not. Its not at all! Have you never hited a ball so thin that it barely moves? (assuming you are playing pool) Im not saying that it was or it wasnt a foul. Im saying that you simply cannot say from that video, and from that angle, with that low frame rate, and with his cue just infront of the ball everyone is trying to see if it beraly moved!

  • @mousitsoula I do play pool and I understand the point you're trying to make. Unfortunately, I do not agree the framerate is to blame. I believe there is enough evidence to conclude that it was a foul and I remember watching this entire match. I remember it was also obvious by the path the cue ball took after the contact of the two balls but it was so long ago I'd have to see it again. I love bustamante and I was very sad to see him lose but I, personally, can't deny that it was a foul

  • hate to be that guy but there is no such thing as a split. it is impossible to hit two balls at exact same time. one will hit before other. even if it was a good hit I dont see any balls hitting a rail afterwards. BAD HIT

  • @UgotDaSeven uhm no offense buddy, technically speaking you can hit two balls at the same time given that they are of the same exact size, at a certain angle. come to think of it.

    just thinking aloud.

  • @jinjoandanin try telling a ref at state tournament well any tournament and they will laugh when you say your gonna split em.

  • hate to be that guy but there is no thing as a split. It is physically impossible. you hit one ball before the other. bad hit. either way no rail after hit either.

  • it's really a bad shot

  • bad hit

  • The overhead shot that they only show once lcearly shows a bad hit, the 9 gets hit WAY before the 3. Who cares about seeing 50 replays from the worst angle imaginable, the first showing of the shot from overhead shows a clear foul.

  • its just the angle of the camera there actually both getting hit at the same time

  • no they dont in the first replay you can see clearly the 9 getting hit first

  • boring

  • Where's the controversy? He hit the 9 1st clearly. The 1st shot of the video shows it clearly.

  • its foulllllllllllllllllll!!!!! morons.. id wished busti won but for goodness sake--- its foulllll !!!!

  • watch the ball spin...when it just before it hits the nine...it changes direction

  • yeah its foul.!!!! he hits 9 ball first .!!

  • it's obviously bad fuckin' shot!

  • foul indeed, what is controversial about it?

  • the 9 ball move 1st, its foul why keep on repeating!

  • wtf did u keep it repeating...

  • It obviously made contact with the 9-ball before the 3-ball, therefore a foul should have been called. You can see this on the overhead view more clearly.

  • i guess the person who posted this vid is favoring the "foul" side and trying to convince us. I can't really tell either, but other vid of this shot has diff angle views

  • Bad shot...

  • what a waste of time we see it in the first second why carry on

  • why the fuck is the cue ball humping the 9 ball?

    :DDDD

  • the cuebaLL wanTs to be a faTher!!

  • Definitely a foul

  • i watched this match live..this shot rewinded in repetition because it cant see in a naked eye. its so close! even the referee cannot tell if its badshot or not..we thought that django won in this match..

  • i also saw this match live on tv. and i felt bad for django when it was declared a foul. i thought he won the match then..

  • Whoever posted this video is a waste of space

  • tingnan mo anino mo

  • retarded cheesy spunk

  • omfg how many times can you make the fucking ball go back and forth with out even showing the actual fucking shot? Jesus.

  • @andydremeaux : Apparently, an even dozen.

  • What a stroke! He's actually able to get the cue ball to stop and change directions, just going back and forth like fifty times! Amazing!

  • What a moronic video.

  • omg why did you rewinded it milion times?...it started to be really annoying

  • foul!~

  • lol the ref is just a human and if u will look at that in just ur naked eye u cant see it clearly..nobody is perfect / thats all . but some says practice makes perfect ..lol

  • what is controversial here ? Django is fucking lier.........

  • djanggo is d best than ur idol fuck u shit

  • it was a clear foul. this cam doesnt show it clear

  • at first when i was watching the match on tv i didn't think it was a foul. it looked totally fine. but the slow motion replays really show it...it's an obvious foul.

  • yeah.. it really was...

  • @duhhh86 Foul,but the ref wont call it on Busto,its sort of like the Michael Jordan rule in Basketball.At least thats what it seems like to me.

  • its a slow-mo!

  • what the fuck is going on here?

  • Bustamante vs. Peach. Bustamante is on the hill and gets bad position on the 3 ball. He has to kick at it. What you don't see is that after he kicks at the 3 ball he actually makes the nine. He thought he won. The ref(s)reviewed the hit a million times before ruling it a foul. In my opinion it was a foul. I see the 9 ball moving before the 3 ball. Peach gets ball in hand and goes on to win the match. I believe it happened in the Phillipines. The crowd was really roudy after that call.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more