Colorado 9 news: Your Show with Ron Paul

[dumbassstupidpeople]

Ron Paul was our last chance, you know that right?

[jonnyanony]

That's Right, If Rome is too far back to remember... How about Russia?

Awesome Video!

[gwengoad]

this man is the only person that has the elephant balls to tell us the ugly truth!

[chewbaca1989]

bahh, bahh, bahh. I don't understand what he says?

You Go Ron!

[sniper6081]

Keep promoting Ron Paul for president even after the election.

[deanx0r]

Emotion is the enemy of Reason.

[AttunedFlux]

bah. i dont agree with that. emotion is a part of our humanity and it can be a great tool at fueling the passion that can drive us to reason. you are probably frustrated with humanities tendency to let our emotions blind us and cause our intentions to be misplaced, and while that is a valid concern, i dont think we should not view our humanity as an enemy.

[maggiebott]

I'm voting on Ron Paul's flawless record that proves his patriotism. He votes for the people, not corrupt government.

[VideoZonkers]

the government is for and by the people--read the constitution. unlike corporations (who paul would like to run our country) that answer only to majority share holders.

[gwengoad]

you are so wrong we the people control the corporations.... If WE HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE AND ACCOUNTABLE MEANS BREAK THEM JUST ONE AND THEY WILL CAPITULATE OR DIE! LIVE FREE OR DIE HAVE YOU READ IT?

[VideoZonkers]

oh yeah, people have really been able to hold corporations accountable. on my days off I go break into factories at night and inspect them with my detection equipment I bought with my savings. On the weekends I look over all of the corporate private books (I have a friend in their accounting dept) and I make sure they are all legit.

[takadi]

What makes you think government isn't just one big corporation?

[StandupShowcase]

what makes you think I'm not just one big corporation? because I'm not, and neither is the government. nice fantasy point though!

[takadi]

How is the government any less different than a cartel? I'm not talking about sovereignty, something which you for some reason pulled out of your ass to invalidate my point.

Government is a legitimized coercive monopoly

[yeahcincy]

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."

-Barry Goldwater

[rewpublitruth]

I agree with 99% of what DR RON PAUL says. If what Dr, Paul says is true, than what does that make the people that vote for the other canidates, conspiroters to murder !!! DOes anybody remember Pres. Johnson when he said, "Your sons and your sons sons will be Viet Nam". Now we have the same remarks coming from all of the canidates,republican and democrat, except Dr Ron Paul.We do not need perpetual war. I believe that we have warmongers.

[VideoZonkers]

Ron Paul: Freedom for corporations to do whatever they want. His revolution turned out to be around 4 percent of a primary. LOL

[OctoBox]

Zonkers who are you voting for?

[VideoZonkers]

wanted kucinich, voting obama.

[OctoBox]

Kucinich endorsed Ron Paul!

Kucinich was a Peace candidate, right? Obama has voted for ever single War Measure and Foreign Military Interventionsism post the 1st version of the Patriot Act.

Ron Paul has an odd cross section of supports: The most Military, the most Police, and cannabis culture magazine

cannabisculture(dot)com/articl­es/5147.html

[OctoBox]

Corporatism vs Free Markets article:

lewrockwell(dot)com/gregory/gr­egory64.html

Its probably too late for you to change your vote but not too late to learn, so when Obama or McCain is running this country we can GET IT RIGHT in 2012, hahaha.

[OctoBox]

Zonkers: "free-markets" is probably your hang up with Ron Paul -- I only say that because NO ONE voting Kucinich is for Warfarism and anyone who works wants everyone capable of working to not live off of the taxpayer -- This only leaves his "free-market" stance.

Google: "free-markets vs corporatism" -- I didn't understand these things until I researched them.

[VideoZonkers]

there is no such thing as a free market. without regulations, corporations manipulate the market and drive out competition, wages, innovation, environmental concerns. oh and of course jobs.

[OctoCuba]

Zonkers: Your own rationale defeated your own position. Free Markets without regulations will drive out ...jobs. We have regulations and we don't have free-markets. Are you sure your analysis is correct? Follow those links and study - don't react just go check 'em out. I'm an econonmist by training I'm not guessing at this.

[VideoZonkers]

We have a right wing government that doesn't enforce regulation, much less institute strong ones.

[OctoBox]

You are locked up in thinking Right or Left Wing. G.Bush in favor of war, Hillary in favor of War, Bill Clinton in favor of War (more U.S soldiers died under Clinton then Bush), Obama voted for all war measures and foreign military colonialism (760 bases in 130 countries)! Vietnam (Democrats), Korea (Democrats), Bombing Japan (Democrats), Former slave-holders (Democrats) -- JFK not in favor of civil liberties in '57. MLK Jr (republican), Gandhi (Civil Libertarian) Ron Paul (Civil Libertarian)

[VideoZonkers]

You are locked up in thinking of political party labels. The parties have changed substantially since those wars you mentioned. And you even go back to slave trade? Wow you claim to be educated but have close to no clue about American political and social history.

[OctoBox]

Zonk: Everything I said was true, however, my point was just that, TOO NOT get so caught up in partyism -- nevertheless everything I said was true. The CFR is the only "Party" running all Democrats and almost all Republicans -- Not Ron Paul -- CFR Members: Obama, Clinton, McCain, Romney, Huckabee, Dodd, Biden, Edwards, Guiliani --- The list goes on and on!! My point, not Ron Paul. Look choosing a politician, simple. Oathkeepers or Oathbreakers -- Only one Oathkeeper by voting record, simple.

[clellJASMINE]

Yeah, you must have a PHD in government. You must watch CNN and MSNBC and FOX. And all the Sunday morning political shows. You are one intelligent dude or dudess. Why don't you write a book and straighten us all out?

[clellJASMINE]

You need to read the Constitution. It's only a few pages.

Bet you can't read the OSHA book. hahahaha

[clellJASMINE]

think before you open your mouth and erase all doubt as to your intelligence. Corporatism, fascism, communism, socialism, etc. are all controls by the gov upon free individuals to restrict them from trading with who they want at what price they want. Corps can ONLY control the market WHEN the gov is involved. The gov is to provide a non-biased court system to protect ind. rights. When gov gets involved, corps then influence gov to restrict competition. Have you tried starting a new biz?

[VideoZonkers]

yeah that makes perfect sense: without regulations, corporations will not try to maximize profits by all means possible; even though that is their sole objective. they won't form monopolies, exploit workers, or pollute the earth--they must only do that in china because they are protesting regulations here in the US.

[clellJASMINE]

And so with 100 years of regulations you think the system is more fair now. You should go start a business. Come up with an idea. Hire some employees. See what you think then Mr. Zonkers. Ron Paul's policy is to allow private property owners sue corporations for polluting their land. And what's wrong with maximizing profits. You do it every day. Have you turned down a raise lately? I think not.

[StandupShowcase]

jasmine you really swallowed the free market bs huh? somehow corporations are only acting deviantly because they are slightly regulated..if only we could remove all regulation, they'd behave. what are you on?

[cobratip]

do you think the system we currently have in place is better than a free market system? if not, what would be a better system?

[StandupShowcase]

the "free market" is a fallacy and has lead to the supremacy of multi national corporations exerting their "freedom" over small businesses, workers, and the environment.

[cobratip]

so is the current system better? if not what would be better?

[VideoZonkers]

the current system is closer to a true free market than any time in the past. free trade agreements and right wing bush laissez faire deregulation. this downward spiral really exploded under regan and has gotten worse since. more power and wealth into a smaller amount of hands.

[cobratip]

"freetrade agreements" involve major amounts of regulation...and disregard national sovereignty

[VideoZonkers]

looks like we will agree to disagree. I believe FTA's remove to much regulation. For instance, we allow our corporations to go to 3rd world countries that have no labor or environmental standards.

[cobratip]

yeah but i think that we really shouldnt do that. our country is in decline because of plolicies like this. look at our dollar and our economy. there's interesting writings on this subject by a man named Horowitz (i think) and Paul Kennedy if youre interested. Horowitz search should be for "hegemony" and Kennedy search for"The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers." central economic planning for third world countries only generates profits for big bankers and the money usually get to corrupt leaders

[VideoZonkers]

there are plenty of examples of mixed economies (canada and europe) where the standard of living is higher than the US and there is a MUCH less disparity of wealth. we have elections to get rid of any corrupt leaders--plus we should have publicly financed elections like in europe, so there is no money in the election process at all. corporations on the other hand only answer to majority share holders and don't even pretend to have the nation's interest at heart.

[cobratip]

corporations would have to maintain the nations best interests if they werent protected by the government - otherwise they would lose profit. also the government should protect the freedoms of individuals over corporations but today we see the opposite, the destruction of personal liberties by the government...in the name of freedom and safety! how absurd. If individual, constitutional freedoms are protected by government, everyone would be better off ulimately... or else we're employee-slaves

[VideoZonkers]

Yes we see the opposite today. That is because we have a right wing administration that favors big business over people. That is why we have elections.

[cobratip]

its not about the "right" or the "left." thats all a game to keep the general public divided...theyre all on the same page. any government official takes an oath to protect the constitution from all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC. however we're witnessing our consitution's destruction. we need to get authentic constitutionalists into the system. dont be fooled by democrat and republican, mostly all of them want more power and money. look for a true OUTSIDER to change the system

[VideoZonkers]

actually it is about the right and the left. the right is for laissez faire deregulation--and the libertarians are the extreme example of that. and the left wants to regulate corporate power. authentic constitutionalists? that is a huge load of crap. people interpret it differently all the time, why do you think the supreme court has split decisions? let me guess..only you know the correct interpretation.

[cobratip]

dont put too much faith in government regulation. the less there is, the better off we are. federal government's main purpose is to protect individual liberties and maintain the military...thats about it.

[VideoZonkers]

you are wrong. without government regulation, we'd have lower wages, an unsafe food supply, more pollution, more corporate monopolies. these things are of course getting worse and worse since the govt. has moved to the right and deregulation. it is amazing to me how libertarians have bought into some backwards fantasy where somehow corporations will be good as long as you don't regulate them. it isn't hard to open a history book and look at our early industrial age or just look at china now.

[cobratip]

if government protected your personal liberties and defended your private property, you would be protected from all those bad things you just mentioned. china has massive amounts of regulation, it's communist! and look what comes of it, lead in the toys. government regulation = less freedom = less safe

[VideoZonkers]

sorry you must've missed the past 5 years or so where china opened up their economy and it is completely unregulated. that is why companies are allowed to pay whatever they want to people and there are no inspectors coming to the factories to look for lead, pollution. Sorry I'm done debating you, you've swallowed the libertarian bs and it is impossible to have a logical conversation with someone who thinks regulations on corporations allow them to be worse. good luck to you.

[cobratip]

i just said that if government protected your personal liberties, regulations would be put in place under that philosophical argument...which is fine

[erickrietlow]

The republicans increased the national unfunded liabilities to about 46 trillion, from 20.3, in just five years. that's about as left-wing as you can come. did you know you can't even operate a automotive paint booth without an industrial air filtration system anymore? you can't have heavy regulation WITHOUT big business - they're the only ones who can afford to meet all of the standards required by the regulations!

[VideoZonkers]

you think that because republicans increased spending they are left-wing. that means you know little about political theory.

[erickrietlow]

if you think libertarians are by definition Right Wing you dont either..

[VideoZonkers]

libertarians are the extreme right wing, except for social issues. read up on laissez faire governance, you'll like it.

[republicae]

VideoZonkers...At one time the definition of a libertarian was a Classical Liberal. By the way, the so-called laissez-faire period in our history was a time when government was heavily involved with big business and had little to do with the actual ideals of free-enterprise. The government was in bed with big business in ways that caused untold disparity between the haves and have-nots. That was not Classical Liberalism-libertarianism.

[StandupShowcase]

trickle down economics and deregulation doesn't work. read a book.

[chewbaca1989]

All the wealth is steadily is taken from Europeans and they have no say in their government. It's a matrix.

[VideoZonkers]

chewbaca that is a great point if you ignore that they have elections. elections that are free from lobbyist influence due to regulation. so that point isn't so great after all.

[clellJASMINE]

Oh, I forgot. It wasn't governments protecting large corporations that led to monopolies. Big Corporations don't lobby the government for protection. And government employees and politicians are always honest, unlike business owners, who are always corrupt. You should move to China or some other communist country.

[monagie]

THis country is going to become facist and Hilary, Obama and all the other candidates are socialists, this man is the only one defending the rights of the people.

[maggiebott]

Ron Paul wants you to keep your own money and take care of yourself. No more big government stealing our money! He is my HERO!

[rovingbetty]

keep going ron paul!!!!

[L2design]

FEMA CAMPS are coming our way people. Witnesses have seen over half a million body bags coming in truck loads.

REVOLUTION IS THE ONLY WAY.

VOTE 4 DR RON PAUL

[L2design]

DR RON PAUL YAHHH!!!

BUSH is the antichrist. He's sold our National Parks to the UN. He's sold our PORTS to CHINA! A REVOLUTION IS ABOUT TO BE!

[eekdog2005]

Romney or McCain...are you serious? They aren't even Conservatives! Vote for the real deal...Ron Paul!

[jvphantom]

That was an excellent interview! How can you not vote for Dr. Paul? I think the Censoring of Dr. Pauls has gotten really bad. I don't know about other people but I find the TV stations, ie CNN, Fox, etc. have made every attempt not to mention Dr. Paul. They don't want the Dr. Paul rLOVEution to continue. Lucky for us they can't sensor our voices. Say it Loud! Say it Proud! Vote Dr. Ron Paul US President 2008!

[RonPaulGeorgeRingo]

I registered "Republican" ONLY to vote for Ron Paul - which I did. I STRONGLY encourage others to do the same IF THEY HAVE TO in order to vote for him.

That said, I immediately changed right back to "no party".

I CANNOT, in good conscience, be a "Republican" given what the Republican Party "establishment" stands for.

It has NOTHING in common with Ron Paul.

[temporalist]

Excellent interview

[ronheri]

This great, great man is a gift from above. We must support him

[sjlibrabbit]

Libertarian Party wants him, Constitution Party wants him, and every America patriot wants him. Damn the Republicans, full speed ahead!

RON PAUL 2008--HOPE FOR AMERICA--BE PART OF IT

[DillonX]

Why wasn't this big rally reported by MSM?

Caz MSM & GOP convinced public that Rep race is only between McInsane & Romney by hardly mentioning Paul for the 3-4 weeks -- so Paul won't do well today.

(Paul finished 1st or 2nd in 3 sts & lead fund-raising).

Libertaian Party wants Paul as their candidate. HE SHOULD GO.

Conservatives absolutely detest McCain & PAUL can yank votes from McCain in a 3-way or 4-way race.

PAUL GO LIBERTARIAN!

THE GOP STABBED YOU IN THE BACK!

[RonnieJamesreamer]

Ron Paul!!!!

[tspinkham]

What a great man. I can't wait to vote for him today after work.

[rebellioushrew]

Great interview as always. Get out and vote Colorado!!!!

[sm0ky40]

RON PAUL OR BUST !!!

[sratiug]

Vote Ron Paul 2008 today!!! We have not yet begun to fight in Mississippi. Louisiana is ours (we will have 1st place after the lawsuit against the Louisiana GOP). Second in Maine with 35% of the delegates. Mississippi votes in March. About half the states will be left after today. We will win, in the end, because the end of our economy is dying and needs Dr. Ron Paul.

[dreamchaos]

Screw the Media I voted for Ron Paul.

Any vote for another person is a vote for the destruction of the USA as we know it.

[d00bied00]

Just voted for Ron Paul in Springfield, Missouri!

[thetimman00]

If you live in a super Tuesday state, get out and vote for Ron Paul today. He has your best interest in his heart.

[EastWindRain]

Vote Ron Paul all the way. Don't listen to anyone telling you to vote for someone else. They are just trying to divide us. Ron Paul is the only politician running who won't screw you. Restore the Republic.

[bohemianowl]

so simple even a caveman should vote for Ron Paul

[trigonx1]

those were some really good questions asked.

[ronpaulpresidency]

ron paul!

[caseybritton]

I will be voting for Ron Paul in Texas, regardless of what place he comes in Super Tuesday.

[ScarletLetterR]

I vote tomorrow!!!!

RP

08

[WhiskeyBlade]

Damn Ron Paul for being so honest and telling us how it is.... DAMN HIM, I want to be ignorant again

[takadi]

Heroes never choose their fate.

We have to fight whether we like it or not, and this battle will extend beyond Ron Paul, and it will be much greater, greater than the man himself, greater than this election.

[sorienor]

I know what you mean. Sometimes I get so angry because I feel powerless to do anything. Even the Oregon Primary is far too late to effect anything.

[thetimman00]

National news is treating the republican race as if it is a forgone conclusion that McCain will solidify as THE republican candidate today. It is never too late to vote your convictions. I'm with caseybritton. I'm voting for Ron Paul regardless of any previous outcome.

[saynotoslavery]

Posted on:

RONPAULFORPRESIDENT2008. COM

[qazol2]

fantastic!

[truefictions]

You have that right sir. The Revolution is here to stay.

Go Ron Paul!

[jmbrewr]

you can't fight terrorists because it's an ideology. This is why legislation being created is based on the idea that certain ways people act lead to terrorism and these are the people they plan to seek out. Terrorist:a person who has radical ideas or opinions

[d00bied00]

Dr. Paul has brought an end to the American two-party system. We are moving rapidly toward a tri-party system!

[kevinz1985]

He makes so much sense.. so much.

Ron Paul 08

[dewboy910]

It's great to see a politician that does not mind talking straight about the issues even when most will only say what they think the voters want to hear. In fact, most would completely change the subject and never address the question to keep from esposing their positions. wheather seen as good or bad, Dr. Paul has repeatedly expressed his stance on every issue during his 20 years in public office as well as during the GOP debates. Too bad Americans don't take the stance on issues seriously!

[beltcharles]

Why was this marked as spam?

[mythreekings]

get your families to watch this

Go Ron Paul

[travisalger]

I wish he focussed more on how fighting terrorists is completely different than occupying countries and nation building. He needs to drive that point home, too many people cannot see the difference.

[welcometheplagueyear]

u dont fight the terrorist.

[Iain1962]

Perfect, this is a great video to introduce people to the Doctor !

After watching this how could anybody even think of voting for somebody else?