Hari... there is nothing wrong except the Planet who has a " brain " is sucking all of my mems from me and reprodocing them in an illegitimate ... sure nothing wrong at all here
Tired of fake spiritual enlightenment information?Tired of running endlessly into the same useless information?paranormal powers, psychic readings, it is all possible.It is time to take the blindfold off, THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM
Want to learn real spiritual knowledge?Not satisfied what all the chakras and third eye talk?Unleash your true psychic powers.THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM It is time to change the world.
@ttwiligh7 Agree, the new Solaris and the old should not maybe even be compared. When I see this movie I get words like love, eternity, transcedence in my head. Really a masterpiece.
I wonder who arranged Bach's piece so wonderfully. It doesn't seem to be played on an organ, it's more like some electronic keyboard and there are other vibraphone-like sounds, I can't really make them out precisely as I am not a musician. It's so incredibly atmospheric. I saw this film a long time ago when I was 19 years old, I was completely numb when it finished. This scene and its music have stayed with me ever since. There is another wonderful scene of lovers' ascention in "Sacrifice".
@Donizettimaniac Eduard Artemyev worked with Tarkovsky in producing the sound in Solaris. He took the Prelude, electronically enhanced and reworked it, to signify alienation (from Earth, people etc.). I've paraphrased this from 'The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky: A Visual Fugue'. Worth reading.
The wikipedia page on the painting makes an interesting point that the hunters are coming back nearly empty-handed. I wonder if this has thematic significance for the film, where years of exploration have produced so little result in furthering human understanding.
The complete name of the piece is "Ich ruf zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ", or "Prelude Chorale in D minor, BVW 639". In my opinion, Bach's most beautiful work EVER.
If you liked this version, perhaps you should try listening an adaptation for this piece in piano.
The original Russian movie is so much more artistic, than the Hollywood remake from a few years back. Bach's music adds majesty to any movie. Thanks for sharing.
@Untemperedsteel I disagree. Tarkovsky is all style with no substance. Soderbergh is all content with no style, but at least he's saying SOMETHING. Better yet, ignore both films and read the book.
@gmdinformation Books and movies are different mediums of expression, and offer different ways for an artist to express their ideas. I will have a look out for the book though :-) .
@gmdinformation what the fuck are you talking about. Have you ever seen Andrei Rublev, Sacrifice or Mirror by Tarkovsky? No substance? You're a worthless philistine idiot, really. You know nothing.
It's a good movie though. The center piece in Soderbergh's Solaris is a Dylan Thomas poem, "And Death Shall Have No Dominion", instead of Bach's "I claim to thee Lord Jesus Christ" in Tarkovsky's.
Soderbergh made an excellent choice of poetry as a tribute to Tarkovsky. One has to read "Fern Hill" to see how similar Dylan Thomas and Tarkovsky in terms of expressing their ideas.
Tarkovsky transcends base techniques like symbolism. He was an image-maker. His images are free, not confined. They don't impose anything on the viewer. I personally find that trying to assign symbolic meaning to his images makes the viewing experience a technical and boring chore.
In his own words those images are 'metaphors', not symbols. He called the latter spiritual formulas which express certain meanings. But the images have their own existence without interpretation. I am trivializing his thoughts now, but he refused the word 'symbolism'.
About the music, got my theory. Think that Bach work is totally related with the scene's context: the BWV 639 work, or 'Ich ruf zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ' literally means 'I claim You, Lord Jesus Christ'... if you watch this scene, when the couple is assumpting, actually they're going to meet their Maker, Solaris... and the planet, in my opinion, is God... a good way to drag Christianism during soviet years in Russia. Remember that Tarkovsky was a very Russian-Orthodox believer.
The paintings are depictions of humans on earth living lives that she could never have. She has memories of a life like the ones the humans have, but just as the painting is a creation (and the people inside it "fake"), a depiction, an imitation, so too is she. She's like the painting, and Solaris is the artist. That's the way I always saw it...
Watch the Entire movie...with your littlle glass of whatever
that makes you feel at peace....
Everybodys' take is perhaps valid ...
Since this is probably the coolest movie ever made ( soundtrack asnd silence )
So many people can understand the ending....It takes a lot of serene evenings..with good wine and a rusty LSD hangover.....yep .
True...as the years age....then .
scitsalcoryp 6 months ago
i didnt get this film...
utra1337 6 months ago
CAPOLAVORO ASSOLUTO!
43U7 6 months ago
Never mention George Clooney again! It's a sacrilege.
Quex01 6 months ago
One of the strangest scenes ever..especially if you haven't seen the prior hour or so ..
Definitely one of the most haunting gripping flicks ever made
It gets better every time...Ya got to watch it least 12 times !!!!
scitsalcoryp 7 months ago
Hari... there is nothing wrong except the Planet who has a " brain " is sucking all of my mems from me and reprodocing them in an illegitimate ... sure nothing wrong at all here
scitsalcoryp 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tired of fake spiritual enlightenment information?Tired of running endlessly into the same useless information?paranormal powers, psychic readings, it is all possible.It is time to take the blindfold off, THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM
MichelleRundell 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Want to learn real spiritual knowledge?Not satisfied what all the chakras and third eye talk?Unleash your true psychic powers.THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM It is time to change the world.
ErlindaWeiner 11 months ago
I believe they are all synthesizer sounds.
The movie makes me weep no matter how many times I watch.
If this isn't the beauty, what else?
The Hollywood version was a joke, the creation of the director who cannot read between lines.
I remember I went to the Russian shop and asked a lady how did she think about the remake. She just said "Very funny".
ttwiligh7 1 year ago 2
@ttwiligh7 Agree, the new Solaris and the old should not maybe even be compared. When I see this movie I get words like love, eternity, transcedence in my head. Really a masterpiece.
gonrolgonrol 1 year ago
I wonder who arranged Bach's piece so wonderfully. It doesn't seem to be played on an organ, it's more like some electronic keyboard and there are other vibraphone-like sounds, I can't really make them out precisely as I am not a musician. It's so incredibly atmospheric. I saw this film a long time ago when I was 19 years old, I was completely numb when it finished. This scene and its music have stayed with me ever since. There is another wonderful scene of lovers' ascention in "Sacrifice".
Donizettimaniac 1 year ago
@Donizettimaniac Eduard Artemyev worked with Tarkovsky in producing the sound in Solaris. He took the Prelude, electronically enhanced and reworked it, to signify alienation (from Earth, people etc.). I've paraphrased this from 'The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky: A Visual Fugue'. Worth reading.
mit181 7 months ago
IMO solaris is tarkovskys best, only rivalled by mirror. I think it's his most complete film.
rickmcn1986 1 year ago
One of two best sf movies ever. Post written by me. My name is Tikhyi. Ion Tikhyi.
fffatman 1 year ago
this movie is a monster. One of the best ever made
Bandyspelaren 1 year ago 4
so profound and kind, beaauty and so abstract that took me almost crying in pleasure
grozaky 1 year ago
you cannot remake a Tarkovsky film. It's like trying to repaint the Mona Lisa.
Trakovsky is pure art. Just watch "Stalker"(1979) an absolute masterpiece as well.
Sw155 1 year ago 6
This scene brings a tear to my eye every time.
wavelength121 1 year ago
This is one of the most heartbreaking moments I have ever encountered in a movie.
paintingtheblue 2 years ago 14
Comment removed
joycedusoleil 2 years ago
Does anybody know the name and artist of the winther painting being used several times as a briilliant picture of mankind and human civilization ?
PoulLyda 2 years ago
Pieter Bruegel, " The Hunters in the Snow" ( 1565 ).
PoulLyda 2 years ago
@PoulLyda
The wikipedia page on the painting makes an interesting point that the hunters are coming back nearly empty-handed. I wonder if this has thematic significance for the film, where years of exploration have produced so little result in furthering human understanding.
hurting 2 years ago 2
The piece is the chorale prelude "Ich Ruf zu dir"("Orgelbuchlein").
robris72 2 years ago
This scene is one of the most beautiful love scenes I know! Thanx for posting it!
Which piece of Bach is this one?
alexandreferraro 2 years ago
The complete name of the piece is "Ich ruf zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ", or "Prelude Chorale in D minor, BVW 639". In my opinion, Bach's most beautiful work EVER.
If you liked this version, perhaps you should try listening an adaptation for this piece in piano.
thefrias 1 year ago
@thefrias Bach is so titanic that BWV 639 is one of the many gem....
vinciano 1 year ago
Yo estaba en Solaris, por que no existia en ese momento oooooo.
cineastasolaris 2 years ago
Tar. es un genio, el convertir una escena que desde el guion se oye simple para convertirla en poesia.
Romanticamente poetica.
cineastasolaris 2 years ago
siii, no cabe duda, y la elección de la música es... sencillamente divina..
joycedusoleil 2 years ago
Minha parte preferida, fascinante!
CleberPuntel 2 years ago
No, we don't need space ships.... we need a zerkalo....
marcusbondi 2 years ago 7
Incrível!
davifromBRA 2 years ago
!!!!!!!!
nunhov 3 years ago
The original Russian movie is so much more artistic, than the Hollywood remake from a few years back. Bach's music adds majesty to any movie. Thanks for sharing.
Untemperedsteel 3 years ago 30
there was a hollywood remake of solaris???
dans86 3 years ago
Yes back a few years ago, starring George Clooney. Doesn't have anywhere near the majesty of the Russian movie.
Untemperedsteel 3 years ago 25
Clooney played the part of Donatas Banionis playing the part of Kris Kelvin:-)
klavesin 2 years ago
@Untemperedsteel American remakes of great Russian and Japanese films are always flawed. It's a country with no shame.
ihatekhomeini 1 year ago
@Untemperedsteel I disagree. Tarkovsky is all style with no substance. Soderbergh is all content with no style, but at least he's saying SOMETHING. Better yet, ignore both films and read the book.
gmdinformation 11 months ago
@gmdinformation Books and movies are different mediums of expression, and offer different ways for an artist to express their ideas. I will have a look out for the book though :-) .
Untemperedsteel 11 months ago
Comment removed
Vesters1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gmdinformation what the fuck are you talking about. Have you ever seen Andrei Rublev, Sacrifice or Mirror by Tarkovsky? No substance? You're a worthless philistine idiot, really. You know nothing.
Vesters1 7 months ago
It's a good movie though. The center piece in Soderbergh's Solaris is a Dylan Thomas poem, "And Death Shall Have No Dominion", instead of Bach's "I claim to thee Lord Jesus Christ" in Tarkovsky's.
Eikinkloster 2 years ago 5
Soderbergh made an excellent choice of poetry as a tribute to Tarkovsky. One has to read "Fern Hill" to see how similar Dylan Thomas and Tarkovsky in terms of expressing their ideas.
bushcrap2019 2 years ago 5
Mi escena preferida.
ifilmwatchlearn 3 years ago 2
the solaristic wave!
magtyum 3 years ago
shitty vid uch
huiswerk999 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Meer aandacht aan je huiswerk besteden, dan bereik je misschien een hoger beschavingsniveau.
erfonian 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hmm... je bent vast een neger
huiswerk999 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
faggot
huiswerk999 3 years ago
True, this scene deserves better than a badly synced version. The music and imagery are still great though.
dopiflu 3 years ago 6
does anyone have the opening credits?
FlavioGirl 3 years ago
@FlavioGirl Read Wiki: Solaris (1972 film)
olddino2005 1 year ago
Wonderful, fabulous - thank you so much for these Solaris extracts
oldbagpuss 4 years ago 5
Tarkovsky transcends base techniques like symbolism. He was an image-maker. His images are free, not confined. They don't impose anything on the viewer. I personally find that trying to assign symbolic meaning to his images makes the viewing experience a technical and boring chore.
faraz1729 4 years ago 8
In his own words those images are 'metaphors', not symbols. He called the latter spiritual formulas which express certain meanings. But the images have their own existence without interpretation. I am trivializing his thoughts now, but he refused the word 'symbolism'.
therabbit27 4 years ago 3
About the music, got my theory. Think that Bach work is totally related with the scene's context: the BWV 639 work, or 'Ich ruf zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ' literally means 'I claim You, Lord Jesus Christ'... if you watch this scene, when the couple is assumpting, actually they're going to meet their Maker, Solaris... and the planet, in my opinion, is God... a good way to drag Christianism during soviet years in Russia. Remember that Tarkovsky was a very Russian-Orthodox believer.
thefrias 4 years ago
Yea....almost....agnostic....
Nekronn 2 years ago
This is a beautiful, beautiful scene. Great movie. Under-appreciated by western audiences, I think.
Blacksun1942 4 years ago 6
ah, Bach, 5th organ chorale
NeoMalikov 4 years ago 3
immortal!
bach-ich rufe zu dir, Herr j-k und Herr andry tarkovski
Paganini1983 4 years ago
what are the paintings exactly? are they culturally significant or something?
Sekein 4 years ago
of course... she is hiding in memories of earth... like that paintings... I think so.
MartinSlovakian 4 years ago 2
The paintings are depictions of humans on earth living lives that she could never have. She has memories of a life like the ones the humans have, but just as the painting is a creation (and the people inside it "fake"), a depiction, an imitation, so too is she. She's like the painting, and Solaris is the artist. That's the way I always saw it...
Blacksun1942 4 years ago 6
Great theory, the poitn about the painting is totally posible, but I still got a question and about the scene: what's the meaning of the assumption?
thefrias 4 years ago 3
This scene means as much to me as my own memory or dream. I could live in this film.
homeostatic 4 years ago 6
so I do too
MartinSlovakian 4 years ago 3
One of the greatest films ever made. Period. :)
Transformers217 4 years ago 4
una de las escenas mas bellas jamas logradas.
niklagofloda 4 years ago
30 seconds of weightlessness. Sublime.
pontecorvo 4 years ago 4
I agree with u all!, one of my favourite cinema scenes, I love Brueghel paintings as well!..
Antares070 4 years ago 3
Thanks for uploud!
semionza 4 years ago 2
Absolutely gorgeous scene. It never ceases to move me.
Yakovlievich 4 years ago 2
Completely agree with you
PeppinoTheBrave 4 years ago 2
Immortal scene.
One of the greatest scenes of twentieth century moviemaking. Powerful, disturbing heartbreaking.
solarisy456 5 years ago 6
Immortal scene.
One of the greatest scenes of twentieth century moviemaking. Powerful, disturbing and heartbreaking.
solarisy456 5 years ago 4