yes, it could happend, but saying that it could does not prove it real. it is just a theory, you are the same as religions in every way. everything could happend. ex. everybody knows that the odds that i will get 6 in dicethrow are 1:6, but it does not mean that i will get 6 exacly one time when i throw it 6 times, i can get 6, 0 times or every single one. AND is it possible that i will get 7 on the 1cube if i will thow it infinite times? the same is with eye there was nothing before right?
how convenient for the creationists to focus on one organ which at first sight works so well but ignore all the other parts of the body that are so botched up no truly intelligent creature would create them. Like the appendix or the spermatic plexus. The human body is so fucked up if I were a god I wouldn't take credit for it for sure.
Really? That is a very lame statement you have made. On it's own, or even trying to jam that into context, you're wrong or you don't make sense. I wish I could make an exception to the rule and say that people like yourself actually DID come from monkeys! That would account for YOUR ignorance ;) And would account for your over fondness of big bananas.
lol ive got images in my head of Darwin trying to write the phrase Methinks It Is Like a Weasel, and getting really angry. But the theory itself is awesome, very well displayed by Dawkins here.
Well, any young-earth creationist, for a start. There simply hasn't been time for evolution and natural selection to have worked if the earth is only 6,000 years old.
Watch any creationist debate with Hitchens, Dawkins, Dennett or Harris and you'll see it.
you don´t need more that 6000 for natural selection you only need one generation all creationists believe that all the variety of dogs came from one pair of dogs, no one denys natural selecction, the problem is that you can accept natural selection without assuming that humans and chimps have a common ansestor
dude. saying creationist believe in natural selection is like saying submarines where meant for land travel. What is intelligent design? Its not national selection where the selection happen naturally. But ID is designed for its habitat. That is the problem why its a bunch of crap. Your bible does not say any thing for fact. Your minister interpret it and change it how they see fit, then you try to force that on our children in the schools
Hi, let me bring some clarity. Creations (the ones that know what they're talking about) don't deny natural selection but believe that through natural select genetic information is becoming limited.
Example a mongrel dog has the genetic code to make a number of pure breeds of dog through selective breeding. But a pure breed will only produce more pure breed dogs of that type. Understand that being "pure" means you have less genetic material and are more susceptible to disease.
(eg 1/5 of dalmations are blind, the central Americans that died because of the lack of immunity to flu during European settlement).
But creationist believe that species can vary without creating new families/genus/kind which would be evolution. That is what megabraddotcom is saying.
megabraddotcom has a good final point. Look up "Law of life". It's a scientific law, not a theory like evolution.
Creationists do not deny 'natural selection', they deny evolution, and that is that SPECIES change one into the other, as in monkeys changed into men. Of course then you must ask the question, how come there are still monkeys?? Also, evolution does not prove how life came to be.
Evolution never claimed to give the answer to how life started. Any Evolution text book does not say life started like this. In classic Creationist ill informed speak, your defaming the method by saying something evolution never said. You will never see in a text book that evolution replaces all spices along the way. Please research before you poison young minds. Buy a non-bashing evolution book, read it with a open mind, and if you still find fault .. then site real issues not made up ones.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
And here is something YOU will never see.... a REAL 'transitional' fossil. You have no proof for your dream of evolution. How 'bout THAT 'real' issue? Please research before YOU poison young minds. And while you're at it, read Charles Darwins own opinion of his lousy theory. The fossil record proves evolution WRONG.
Evolution doesn't say that monkey's change into men, Thats the most common misunderstanding. We descended from a common ancestor to chimpanzees. And your comment about if we came from monkey's why are there still monkey's, I bet you though that was pretty clever, but it's not. First, we didn't evolve from monkey's, secondly, it would be like asking, If amarican's came from eoropeans, why are there still europeans.
Great flawed science! Wouldn't it be more like saying "If Americans came from the English why are there no English people in America"? Because geographically Americans and Europeans/English are separated but humans and monkeys are geographically similar.
No one ever said monkeys changed into men. The theory is that humans and primates share a common ancestor which speciated into their respected species due to different selection pressures. Read a textbook.
Quite interesting. He's doing a good job of graphically illustrating what he's talking about and explaining evolution by natural selection extremely well.
4:55 now I know how to rob a bank: Just tell them you're only pretending to rob a bank for an evolution documentary then run off with all the cash!
:P
AlexanderIsaacConan 6 days ago
I think it's ironic how he complains of the Lord Privy Seals' in Ben Stien's crationist flim, but has no problem with it in his film.
hack451 10 months ago
yes, it could happend, but saying that it could does not prove it real. it is just a theory, you are the same as religions in every way. everything could happend. ex. everybody knows that the odds that i will get 6 in dicethrow are 1:6, but it does not mean that i will get 6 exacly one time when i throw it 6 times, i can get 6, 0 times or every single one. AND is it possible that i will get 7 on the 1cube if i will thow it infinite times? the same is with eye there was nothing before right?
SummerDay0001 1 year ago
Why are there Only 6700 view for a video this important
pheeson 1 year ago
how convenient for the creationists to focus on one organ which at first sight works so well but ignore all the other parts of the body that are so botched up no truly intelligent creature would create them. Like the appendix or the spermatic plexus. The human body is so fucked up if I were a god I wouldn't take credit for it for sure.
sondano 1 year ago
I wana touch all of u. u sexy little science lovers
surethang27 1 year ago
::norbit voice:: "thats not science"
33SaintBernards 1 year ago
lol, "well, I don't have a monkey here, but I suppose if I close my eyes and bash away, I can pretend to be a monkey".... I am sooooo saving it!
Sutskoen 2 years ago 2
Yeah I loved that line - It's like preempting that south park episode by 20 years :D
Snuffomatica 2 years ago
Wicked that computer is using the Genetic Algorithm Design technique for pattern matching. Go late 80's power!
Entertainmentwf 2 years ago
(at the lock part) he looks at the screen with a kind of "deadly seriousness"
"because if i dont get it right.....i have to go all the way back to the beggenings"
(he should have also removed glasses..... man i love richard dawkins)
sulthus 2 years ago
@sulthus if i get your CSI reference right, this should of course be followed by
YEAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
bladit 2 years ago
@bladit somthing like that lol
sulthus 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hahaha! What a smug a hole! His little computer program!! Hahaha, what a rig job! pseudo science dirtbag.
Am I to believe this guy is the best evolutionists have to offer to try and prove darwinism? What a joke!
megabraddotcom 2 years ago
it proves that if you beleive in chance you have to beleive in evolution you ignorant god fearing basterd
17xbox17 2 years ago
Really? That is a very lame statement you have made. On it's own, or even trying to jam that into context, you're wrong or you don't make sense. I wish I could make an exception to the rule and say that people like yourself actually DID come from monkeys! That would account for YOUR ignorance ;) And would account for your over fondness of big bananas.
megabraddotcom 2 years ago
and saddly....creationists have no answers
and hes right by the way
sulthus 2 years ago
lol ive got images in my head of Darwin trying to write the phrase Methinks It Is Like a Weasel, and getting really angry. But the theory itself is awesome, very well displayed by Dawkins here.
Geraldon1 3 years ago 2
that is stupid, creationists do not deny natural selecction
a01011399 3 years ago
What? I think you need to do some research. It shouldn't take much. Just watch any creationist video on youtube at random.
hackenbollox 3 years ago
not even kent hovind denys natural selecction, that is just a straw man argument,
a01011399 3 years ago
Using Kent Hovind to support any argument is about the worst thing you can do. Epic fail.
Do the research.
hackenbollox 3 years ago 4
well show me one creationists that denays natural selection
a01011399 3 years ago
Well, any young-earth creationist, for a start. There simply hasn't been time for evolution and natural selection to have worked if the earth is only 6,000 years old.
Watch any creationist debate with Hitchens, Dawkins, Dennett or Harris and you'll see it.
hackenbollox 3 years ago 2
you don´t need more that 6000 for natural selection you only need one generation all creationists believe that all the variety of dogs came from one pair of dogs, no one denys natural selecction, the problem is that you can accept natural selection without assuming that humans and chimps have a common ansestor
¿where can i find a debate?
a01011399 3 years ago
accutlaly most do .. maybe embracing it is what you have been taught.. but like cheese on a pizza.. creationist deny natural selection.
lancejujitsu 3 years ago
no, they do not
a01011399 3 years ago
dude. saying creationist believe in natural selection is like saying submarines where meant for land travel. What is intelligent design? Its not national selection where the selection happen naturally. But ID is designed for its habitat. That is the problem why its a bunch of crap. Your bible does not say any thing for fact. Your minister interpret it and change it how they see fit, then you try to force that on our children in the schools
lancejujitsu 3 years ago 2
@lancejujitsu
Hi, let me bring some clarity. Creations (the ones that know what they're talking about) don't deny natural selection but believe that through natural select genetic information is becoming limited.
Example a mongrel dog has the genetic code to make a number of pure breeds of dog through selective breeding. But a pure breed will only produce more pure breed dogs of that type. Understand that being "pure" means you have less genetic material and are more susceptible to disease.
joshualcoombe 1 year ago
@lancejujitsu
cont.
(eg 1/5 of dalmations are blind, the central Americans that died because of the lack of immunity to flu during European settlement).
But creationist believe that species can vary without creating new families/genus/kind which would be evolution. That is what megabraddotcom is saying.
megabraddotcom has a good final point. Look up "Law of life". It's a scientific law, not a theory like evolution.
joshualcoombe 1 year ago
Creationists do not deny 'natural selection', they deny evolution, and that is that SPECIES change one into the other, as in monkeys changed into men. Of course then you must ask the question, how come there are still monkeys?? Also, evolution does not prove how life came to be.
megabraddotcom 2 years ago
Evolution never claimed to give the answer to how life started. Any Evolution text book does not say life started like this. In classic Creationist ill informed speak, your defaming the method by saying something evolution never said. You will never see in a text book that evolution replaces all spices along the way. Please research before you poison young minds. Buy a non-bashing evolution book, read it with a open mind, and if you still find fault .. then site real issues not made up ones.
lancejujitsu 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And here is something YOU will never see.... a REAL 'transitional' fossil. You have no proof for your dream of evolution. How 'bout THAT 'real' issue? Please research before YOU poison young minds. And while you're at it, read Charles Darwins own opinion of his lousy theory. The fossil record proves evolution WRONG.
megabraddotcom 2 years ago
Evolution doesn't say that monkey's change into men, Thats the most common misunderstanding. We descended from a common ancestor to chimpanzees. And your comment about if we came from monkey's why are there still monkey's, I bet you though that was pretty clever, but it's not. First, we didn't evolve from monkey's, secondly, it would be like asking, If amarican's came from eoropeans, why are there still europeans.
shuffenhauser 2 years ago 24
@shuffenhauser
Great flawed science! Wouldn't it be more like saying "If Americans came from the English why are there no English people in America"? Because geographically Americans and Europeans/English are separated but humans and monkeys are geographically similar.
joshualcoombe 1 year ago
No one ever said monkeys changed into men. The theory is that humans and primates share a common ancestor which speciated into their respected species due to different selection pressures. Read a textbook.
skullydt 2 years ago 2
im ripping that part where he says "i suppose if i shut my eyes and bash away i can pretend to be a monkey"
drexlfoley 3 years ago
Quite interesting. He's doing a good job of graphically illustrating what he's talking about and explaining evolution by natural selection extremely well.
federalD 3 years ago
i know what he means, but computers can't do ANYTHING at random. with a computer, there's always a pattern.
NorseRonin 3 years ago
They need to show this in biology classes (I eMailed my teacher, BTW)
JETZcorp 3 years ago
Im the 1st...to comment here. well the video is so educational gain knowledge....
raksta76 3 years ago
wow, you're the first comment here?! you're so cool, can I touch you?
Adkit2 3 years ago 13
Im the 1st...to comment here. well the video is so educational gain knowledge....
raksta76 3 years ago
Im the 1st...to comment here. well the video is so educational gain knowledge....
raksta76 3 years ago