Added: 2 years ago
From: Scottb179
Views: 10,672
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It seems to me as you can never get amount of I's divisible by 3, which means that you can never get rid of I's in the statement.

  • How is all of this math helping to explain the surfacing of consciousness/self-awareness from atoms :( All I see is fabrications of explanations of the physical world made by a collection of consciousnesses D: Or maybe I'm just too tired to care. It is 4am and I'm dozing off. Gn youtube.

  • @BLinDaTbESt Some of the most intellectually difficult things to do in problem solving and understanding is to abandon direct and easy paths (because they are obvious, and hence everyone else has tried them to no avail) and follow one's conviction that there is a path, but it will involve 100's of miles of detours. I've been banging my head over GEB for many years, but each year there is more clarity. Don't give up :)

  • Comment removed

  • What about the Mu puzzle? From my angle it looks like M -> Mi -> Mii -> Miii -> Mu

    Right?

  • @FetrovskyGoogle No that is incorrect. i believe you are refering to rule 2 to get your multiple i's to get 3 i's to get your u. However using rule 2 you would get MI -> MII -> MIIII (then apply rule 3) -> MIU. I believe that is what your were thinking

  • Offering $20 to solve the Mu puzzle to people who are obviously unfamiliar is so cruel! Please put all of these lectures up!

  • telling a bunch of students they can make 20$ haha did he expect them to pay attention after that... good vids

  • I think there is something wrong with this video

    it's not playing

    could be a temporary thing with youtube...

  • Speak about a language does not make you metalanguage philosopher or speak about a paint does not make you a metapaint or painter. Speak about something is just a reference. But if your comments are brilliant, then you should became "meta".

  • interesting how you stick to the formal rule of affirming your rejection of propagating communism whenever there might be only the slightest reason to make people believe you could indeed propagate it...... but you shouldn't, because the example is just fitting. and: marx and engels indeed recognized the real character of the capitalist system and the intelligent human being has no choice but to do so, too, when it really faces it. just as you say.

  • aw jesus christ, it's INTELLECTUAL. You're forgiven though for watching this.

  • Very good talk! Thanks for sharing your intelectual work.

  • Woooh! Formal Systems!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more