- Jap Type 90 Tank (50 ton, 1976 design, 350 Km operational range): $7.4 - 9.5 millions/unit
- Korean K1A1 Tank (53.5 ton, 1987 design + 2001 upgrade, 500km operational range): $4.5 millions/unit
As usual, Japanese defense industry is ripping off Japanese government and Japanese tax payers. Who's going to pay $7.4 - 9.5 millions for such a shitty old Jap tank. Only JSDF would pay such a ridiculous amount for such a garbage.
I hope if any Korean people read the comment posted below by a certain trunqnc86,I implore you to please be wise & prudent in your judgment,do not be of haste to being drawn into entrapment by such individuals who seek to foment discord amongst old neighbors.This person's incitement with inflamatory words is obvious at pitting both countries into further disharmony.My response in regards to the existent minute''racist''population,is what can presumably be so called'patriots',misguided ones at it
(1) Japanese have been called "Japs" and "monkeys by Europeans and Americans.
(2) Why were Japs called monkeys by Americans? In the Pacific jungles in WW2, Jap soldiers climbed up the banana trees like monkeys and ambushed the US marines. When the US marines shot down Japs from the trees (using Thompson sub-machine guns), they fell down like monkeys. When Japs came out to surrender, they looked like monkeys, with no clothes and shaves. That's how Japs started to be called MONKEYS.
@youngk9lover - my friend, get the story straight, they all call Asian monkeys not just Japs. Where do you think the term bucket head, chinks, gooks and other names come from and for whom? Just do some research, will ya?
My monkey friend, get the fact straight. (1) The Us marines originally started to Japs "monkeys" in the Pacific jungles. Watch History and Discovery channels and the TV series Pacific. Since then, people call Japs "monkeys". Nobody calls Chinese, Filipinos or any other Asians "monkeys". (2) Who originally called Japanese people "Japs'? Americans, Brits and Europeans did. Now, everyone knows what Jap means, and people call Japanese people "Japs". Nobody calls other Asians "Japs".
The term chinks refers to a Chinese in a derogatory way. The same goes to the term chinos in Spanish Today, in a broad way of racial slur, chinks can be used to refer to all Far Eastern Asians simply because they all look alike to Westerners. However, everybody knows that chinks did and does mean Chinese.
The U.S. Marines serving in the Philippines in the early 20th century called Filipinos "gooks". After that, American soldiers stationed around the world also called non-Americans "gooks". It now is used as a racial slur against all Asians. In other words, Flipinos, Japs, Chinese, Koreans, Vietnamese and all others from Asia are gooks to Americans. Got it?
Korean Sirs & Madams,in a fair word of truth the Japanese does no longer freely give thought that they are a superior(Aryan type) race,they now embrace the understanding that all races are equal & can accel if granted the proper learning enviroment.They have high admiration & respects in regards to Korea's technological advanced developments & also its martial arts,but is saddened by Koreans continued begrudging & misguided perception over past generation's wrong.They are now contented people.
@Gmove02 Japan has and will always be a tank failure. Sorry! K1 would rape that useless T-90 of yours, just as our M1s would cook Russia's own T-90s! ;D Funny how your tank is mostly based off the Leo2, however...
알지도 못하는것들이 꼭나댐 타입90보고 T90이라는 멍청이는머여 ㅋㅋㅋ japanese tanks failed fucking japs k2 exceed in every factor. Go film more avi.s if u have the time to blabber around
sorry, i do not feel that is the case also. they do voice out themselves in front of me,whatever the topic be. i spend quite a lot of my time together with them at work. we have more than 300 staffs. the only thing insecure is the korean insecurities and self claim to everything. thats it. sorry to be blunt.
Even though the design is older, T90 is much better in total quality. Especially the suspension and the control of canon while moving. The problem of Korean tank is its reliability because of made in Korea. Nobody wants to use Korean crap in the real war. By the way, Korea has struggling upgrading this K1 crap to K2 crap for the difficulty of making engine system. I heard that Korea succeeded in copying German Tank before. However, it seems like Koreans were not smart enough.
"They way that u compare the gears is WRONG. give diagrams :/ u posted a random noise (dont know even if its leopards) and u compare it vith video LOL"
No matter whatever evaluated from Japanese is all determined by 'Visual'. That's it, Visual tells everything for their theory(??). Don't get me wrong because I'm treating this matter without any bias; I simply don't understand where the such assurance is came from despite lack of any trustful suggestion & source or information regard of the issue.
bro no mater witch nation bullied weapons i like to tell that not to use for mankind keep those save to fight for alien enemy we need all you brother to fight to save human kind....
@Porsche1080 well. each tank has its ups and down. korean tanks are quality. china tanks is mass produced. and japan tank is kinda decent. so its hard to tell. but an apache can make a difference
Type 98/99 sucks worse than T-90. K1A1 can defeat all of them. Just look at the suspension and gun stabalisation, Korea is up to Western tank standards.
In fact upgrades on existing tanks are extremely common worldwide. Israeli made Merkava Mk 4s, germans have their leopard 2A6s, there are so many modernizations on soviet block T-series, US is likely to get M1A3s in the future...It's just plain wrong to say that improving makes tanks unbalanced. ROK have the money and technology to make a new tank, and the design of K1 has aged 20 years since first prototype was developed, so made a completely new one. And you are saying this is wrong?
Well you can say the same thing about the type 90...which had almost no upgrade since it was first deployed. They made TK-X since they couldn't make type 90 any better, so it is a bad tank, according to your logic.
No,the K1A1 have a better Armor,they use BOTH the Rheinmetall L/44 Gun,so same Firepower,the K1A1 is from 1988 and the Type90 is from 1990 so he isnt really moderner all in all is the K1A1 better
@arstriker, too bad Japan can't export them due to U.S blocks all Japanese weapons. Stop talking like trash, Korean weapons are far superior than Japanese Coz Koreans allow to export weapons and tested at battle field. Accuracy not have been proven between two yet.
I dont know which country bought Korean weapons. Turkey bought K2's tech, but in fact, that isnt Korean techs at all.
K1A1 adopted composite armour made in USA. But, do you think the USA give their top secret to the other country?
And, about composite armour, Japan has a top tech in the world. After Type 90 is developed, the USA is requesting an offer of composite armour tech of Japan, but Japan have rejected.
And Type90's shooting accuracy is already proven at the Yakima training field, USA. Type90 hit the target 3km over, easily, while they are running. This made the USA be surprised.
LoL, that's pretty much same for Japanese made weapons. There is no global prove of Type 90 is more accurate otherwise Turks wouldn't have purchased Korean tank. Btw, you seems to lack knowledge in Tank. K1A1 is almost same as US's Abraham tank, it means have better armor than Japanese.
lol, First K1 tank was based from US Abraham tank, it seems you don't have any knowledge of tanks. Korean tanks & armor vehicles are now being exported to overseas, take your insecurity somewhere else. SKorean army is now Asia's best equipped army.
Basically, Type90 is designed to have a landing interception mission against russian army, so Type90 is deployed only in Hokkaido.
Moreover, Type90 can be moved only by railroad because roads in japan is too narrow for running Type90. So japs are developing small and lightweight TK-X, but it can't be compared to K1A1. It is not a MAIN battle tank(MBT)!!. LOL
OK, you gooks are something different from common people.
Small and lightweight is not the fault but an advantage for mbt.
Russian is developing T-95 which is small and lightweight. And Also US is developing 40t Prototype Tank. Korea cannot only make such a tank because the technology is insufficient.(And your knowledge is insufficient, too)
The Type-10 is Japan's latest. It's superior to the K1A1. The K1A1 has the same level of performance as the early models of M1 Abrams tanks.
inamonianim 1 day ago in playlist Uploaded videos
여기 답글 달고있는 한국인들은 다들 아마 70%는 육군출신일겁니다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
asdfasd742 6 days ago
쪽바리군대도 군대냐?......ㅋㅋ
33divigi 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
leo2 and M1 were developed in the 70s.
Japanese Type90 was developed in the 80s.
Japanese Type10 was developed in the 2000's.
watch?v=1s-yLXhRxxA
watch?v=X1GaQ2n2D4A
watch?v=_B-4XOh_r1I
watch?v=J9P_gr-GbCM
CrimeAvenger2 1 month ago
인간의 전차와 일본원숭이 전차를 비교하는것 자체가 무리다ㅋㅋㅋ
japanshitful 2 months ago
sucky song is sucky .
Type90 MBT for all intended purpose was a cold war era MBT and is discontinued .
Both tank seem equally capable at doing what they were intended to do .
The next generation TK-X is already in testing and trials , do you have anything comparable to that ?
katchaner 3 months ago
@katchaner K2 Black Panther..
CHK0601 3 weeks ago
90の命中精度は百発百中だって知ってっか?
hirotsugu1211 3 months ago
Type-90 is already Old Type in Japan.
Don't you know???
K1A1 Black Panther is Black Malicious like You Korea.
heiwapeacemir 3 months ago 2
K1A1の装填速度遅ッ!!!
90式を見ろ!!速いだろ!!!
K1A1が装填している間に90式が2回は撃つよ!!!
Infinite044 3 months ago
I'm Japanese,No one said Japanese believe Type 90 superior than K1A1
plz don't make story.
nihonjinyade 3 months ago
They are never gonna fight so stop comparing weapons.Peace forever
bonuku701 3 months ago
韓国の兵器とか武器って、型番は「K」みたいだね。
確か韓国軍のアサルトライフルって「K-1A」とか「K2」とかがある。
gurabimosu1 3 months ago
- Jap Type 90 Tank (50 ton, 1976 design, 350 Km operational range): $7.4 - 9.5 millions/unit
- Korean K1A1 Tank (53.5 ton, 1987 design + 2001 upgrade, 500km operational range): $4.5 millions/unit
As usual, Japanese defense industry is ripping off Japanese government and Japanese tax payers. Who's going to pay $7.4 - 9.5 millions for such a shitty old Jap tank. Only JSDF would pay such a ridiculous amount for such a garbage.
youngk9lover 3 months ago
한국군 지상 전력이 왜 5~6위 하는지 싸워봐야 알겠냐? ㅉㅉ 입만 살아서 날뛰는 놈들 ㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉ
newzjaxj 3 months ago
원숭이 새끼들 ㅋㅋ 군대는 갔다왔냐 ㅋㅋ 군대는 갔다와서 총 한번 쏴보고 이야기해라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 형이 사격 만발로 포상 휴가 갔다왔거든. 니네들 바다 건너오면 목위만 날려줄께 ^^ 참고로 k1a1이 type90 가격의 3분의 1이다 ㅋㅋ 좆내 우끼끼는 그만하고 ^^.
newzjaxj 3 months ago
K1A1なんて90式戦車の前じゃただの餌。
比較対象にならん。
K1A1 is the food of type-90 tank.
It does not become a candidate for comparison.
F2faitar 3 months ago
I hope if any Korean people read the comment posted below by a certain trunqnc86,I implore you to please be wise & prudent in your judgment,do not be of haste to being drawn into entrapment by such individuals who seek to foment discord amongst old neighbors.This person's incitement with inflamatory words is obvious at pitting both countries into further disharmony.My response in regards to the existent minute''racist''population,is what can presumably be so called'patriots',misguided ones at it
beaggyboy 3 months ago
Comment removed
beaggyboy 3 months ago
Sorry you Korean, dog is always a dog, you are dogs so accept being a dog, don't act like Japanese - the true Human
trungnc86 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trungnc86
Sorry you Japs. Monkey is always a monkey. You Japs are monkeys, so accept being a monkey. Don't act like Koreans, the true human.
Historically, Japs have been so small and ugly, and that's why Japs have been called 倭人(dwarf) or 倭寇(dwarf pirate) .
youngk9lover 3 months ago
@trungnc86
(1) Japanese have been called "Japs" and "monkeys by Europeans and Americans.
(2) Why were Japs called monkeys by Americans? In the Pacific jungles in WW2, Jap soldiers climbed up the banana trees like monkeys and ambushed the US marines. When the US marines shot down Japs from the trees (using Thompson sub-machine guns), they fell down like monkeys. When Japs came out to surrender, they looked like monkeys, with no clothes and shaves. That's how Japs started to be called MONKEYS.
youngk9lover 3 months ago
@youngk9lover - my friend, get the story straight, they all call Asian monkeys not just Japs. Where do you think the term bucket head, chinks, gooks and other names come from and for whom? Just do some research, will ya?
GottJukrapun 3 months ago
@GottJukrapun
My monkey friend, get the fact straight. (1) The Us marines originally started to Japs "monkeys" in the Pacific jungles. Watch History and Discovery channels and the TV series Pacific. Since then, people call Japs "monkeys". Nobody calls Chinese, Filipinos or any other Asians "monkeys". (2) Who originally called Japanese people "Japs'? Americans, Brits and Europeans did. Now, everyone knows what Jap means, and people call Japanese people "Japs". Nobody calls other Asians "Japs".
youngk9lover 3 months ago
@GottJukrapun
The term chinks refers to a Chinese in a derogatory way. The same goes to the term chinos in Spanish Today, in a broad way of racial slur, chinks can be used to refer to all Far Eastern Asians simply because they all look alike to Westerners. However, everybody knows that chinks did and does mean Chinese.
youngk9lover 3 months ago
@GottJukrapun
The U.S. Marines serving in the Philippines in the early 20th century called Filipinos "gooks". After that, American soldiers stationed around the world also called non-Americans "gooks". It now is used as a racial slur against all Asians. In other words, Flipinos, Japs, Chinese, Koreans, Vietnamese and all others from Asia are gooks to Americans. Got it?
youngk9lover 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@youngk9lover - Do you? Monkeys!
GottJukrapun 3 months ago
Korean Sirs & Madams,in a fair word of truth the Japanese does no longer freely give thought that they are a superior(Aryan type) race,they now embrace the understanding that all races are equal & can accel if granted the proper learning enviroment.They have high admiration & respects in regards to Korea's technological advanced developments & also its martial arts,but is saddened by Koreans continued begrudging & misguided perception over past generation's wrong.They are now contented people.
beaggyboy 3 months ago
@beaggyboy look at the comment directly above yours....lol
most japanese are good people, but there are still MANY who are racist towards korea
SirHungryHippo 3 months ago in playlist More videos from sunyerang
内部の電子機器が絶対的に信用できない。
正直なところ90式と比較できるレベルではない。
百歩譲ってハードは互角だったとして、ソフトの問題でアウト。
そもそも兵器の性能が云々より2国間の戦術の問題がある。
イメージとして前面装甲以外は軟鉄を使ってそうだし。
mumeikantoku 3 months ago
both tanks are copied from abrams and leopald for a nation that produced so much why copied
fred240366 4 months ago
韓国の戦車ってなんかつくりが雑だな。ってか、走行動画出さないのは何で?ぼろが出るから??確かに走りながら砲撃なんて韓国の戦車じゃ無理だもんなww
yamaitachi8848 4 months ago
like most modern japanese military equiptment, the mediocre performance doesn't justify the insanely huge cost.
the type 90 is no exception
SirHungryHippo 4 months ago in playlist More videos from sunyerang
Atomic retards Japs=colony and slaves of USA hahahah cool buds~~~~~~~
psupccea 4 months ago
Actually, the K-2 looks far more protected than it's japanesse counterpart.
Bytheemperor 4 months ago
小韓民国は world top 10 military power 2/2 を見れば10位以内に入っていないという世界認識を学べ。
orenge200020002000 4 months ago
まさかとは思うけど、あの茶色いのってサビじゃないよね。
orenge200020002000 4 months ago
I wouldn't really brag about k1a1 ,both tanks have similar sub systems and weapons, what would set them apart is a crew training.
micoforion 4 months ago
The Korean K2 tank fails in development of the power pack.
In K1, it was defective in an engine mission.
A more basic technical system is inadequacy.
wolfpack13000 4 months ago
mobilety type 90>k1 type90 is 30hp/t 、k1is only 22hp/t
fire type 90>ki type90 has Automatic loading system k1is no anemometer
Armor type 90>k1 type90 has Composite ceramic armor/k! has only Armor hollow expression
which do you like in battlefield ?
takayuki5540 4 months ago
jap - Land Army = Shit , jap - Navy = money shit , jap - Air force = Usually
dltk56 4 months ago
技術提供までしてもらって世代遅れとは哀れなりけり
no7strega 4 months ago
Japs do you guys have a stronger army than south korea? lol..
special force? lol North korea+ South korea VS Japan what do you think about japs? fucking stupid radioactivity monkeys..
TheGalaxy625 4 months ago
韓国初のMTBの88式戦車は日本の90式のプリプロ設計図書を三菱重工が命令によって合衆国経由で韓国に提供しました。これはオリンピックに間に合う様にMBTを欲しがった韓国の我がまま聞いてやった結果です。砲架安定装置も日本があげたものです。韓国次世代戦車ブラックパンサー戦車の姿勢制御装置も日本の模造だし、昔の日本が欧米をまねた事と同じです。複合装甲の技術はさすがに各国がトップシークレット扱いしてますので製造は難しかったですね~結果として韓国は劣ってますので90式と比較すると約5トン重くなってます。トン/馬力重量は30対22で90式が以前優れてます。90式は約15年前の作品ですがやっと追い付いたのかな?同時期に同性能を比較すれば朝鮮人のフェアー精神認めますけど民度はまだ低いですね~FCSの基本性能も15年後に作って90式とやっと並びましたね。自動装てん装置も同じです。韓国次世代ブラックパンサーはレオパルドⅡやM1エイブラムス等の第3世代グループで90式が15年前に採用した自動装てん装置や流行のC4Iを搭載したので馬鹿でかい砲塔になってしまいました。日本は既に第4世代10式=40トンです。
ase90aaa 4 months ago 2
u japanese tanks have no highter advantage than korean tanks except the cost lol
ysjoo22 5 months ago
マジ気持ち悪い韓国人
kaiji32003 5 months ago
テロリストや独裁者に愛される戦車
toro9090toro 5 months ago
自衛隊は軍隊でわありません
toro9090toro 5 months ago
쩍바리들은 군대도 안가면서 뭔 말이 많어 그리고 이것들은 왜 군대가 있는거야 자위대? 그냥 가서 자위나해라
auh2o81 5 months ago
아 일본님들아 님들 탱크 꾸짐 해군만 쌔지 육지군은 좆밥임 ㅇㅋ?
KRmouse 5 months ago
すでに90式はポンコツの戦車時代は10式さらに上をいくもの金さあればいつでも開発可能
そんなに日本をあまり馬鹿にしすぎ
日本は眠れる獅子ネズミにも容赦せずに牙を突き立ってやる、汚いゴミコリは半島で震えて
いろ
toro9090toro 5 months ago
@toro9090toro speak english fag
SirHungryHippo 5 months ago
calpiss69 5 months ago
確かにカタログスペックだけを見ると強そうだけど、
こないだ事故を起こした中国高速鉄道とか、
まともに走らない韓国高速鉄道とか、
とりあえず外国の一番良い所だけコピーして組み立てました!
と言う感じがして、今一信憑性に欠けるのはなぜ?
あくまでもカタログ上の数値で、本当にそれ程信頼出来る、優秀な戦車?
それって、あくまでも安いから、という理由で日本製品の代わりに買われる、
韓国製品の様な物では?
あくまでも、帳尻合わせのカタログスペックだけの様な気がしてしまうのはなぜ?
本当に韓国人も、そういう気持ちを持たずに、自国の戦車が強いと思っているのでしょうか?
calpiss69 5 months ago
almost the same
iphopad 5 months ago
まぁ、とりあえず、日本の戦車が一番!!
patyurisama 6 months ago
K-1 is loose.Kill Korea.
Gmove02 7 months ago
@Gmove02 Japan has and will always be a tank failure. Sorry! K1 would rape that useless T-90 of yours, just as our M1s would cook Russia's own T-90s! ;D Funny how your tank is mostly based off the Leo2, however...
Tyco200 6 months ago
@Gmove02 Also, day only sights? You truly are in the 7th century in terms of tank VS tank.
Tyco200 6 months ago
For the time being, K1A1 And difference 90type is no risk of recall.
(とりあえず、K1A1と違い90式にはリコールの危険性は無い。)
tomyyuu1 7 months ago 2
The K1A1 is basically an M1A2 Abrams.
inamonianim 7 months ago
Nonopiece type90 isnt t90 its a fucked up japanese tank
her0iclegend 7 months ago
알지도 못하는것들이 꼭나댐 타입90보고 T90이라는 멍청이는머여 ㅋㅋㅋ japanese tanks failed fucking japs k2 exceed in every factor. Go film more avi.s if u have the time to blabber around
her0iclegend 7 months ago
와.. 대단하시네요..
hsl810 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
何かにつけて日本を引き合いに出さずにはいられない哀れな韓国人。
あからさまに敵意や挑発丸出しの動画を作るようなところからも、彼らの国民性というか、哀れな一面がうかがえますね。
yukkun0923 8 months ago 33
일본새끼들 알지도 못하면서 지랄되기는 ㅉㅉ
iloveepl4ever 9 months ago 18
@iloveepl4ever
그렇게 말이유.
지네들은 힘만 세다고 자랑하고는 컴퓨터기슬은 무식하게
못한 주제에 존나 나대고 지뢀한다.
specailforece707wars 7 months ago
K1 is more price-effective, AND its prettier IMO
SirHungryHippo 9 months ago
Type90 is slightly superior to K1A1...that is fact
but considering Type90's price, have to compare with K2
Type90 is failed because its price.. double of Abrams
and it has critical weakness, too weak armor( even RPG can destroy it very easily,
K1A1, K1 can endure)
too much price, too weak armor with its worst mileage (330m/L) which make Type90 shorter moving range(350km)
Japan has 270 Type90, but Korea has K1 more than 1000,and 480 K1A1
Type90 is just money eater
d77243 9 months ago
I believe that the Type 90 is better.
But Koreans... You have the K2... The K2 is better than type 90 and k1a1...
So why do you care? ;)
MuKo18 10 months ago
As you know,
K1A1 is 10 year newer model than Type 90.
BEER0121 10 months ago
Let the Japanese Jerk off...
K2 black panther hahah take that and measure it to type-90
xD
kim4738 10 months ago
course k1's cheaper.. but still stronger than the japanese type 90
MsTheTerminator 10 months ago
@cirasoni09
sorry, i do not feel that is the case also. they do voice out themselves in front of me,whatever the topic be. i spend quite a lot of my time together with them at work. we have more than 300 staffs. the only thing insecure is the korean insecurities and self claim to everything. thats it. sorry to be blunt.
richardhaw 1 year ago
@cirasoni09
i live and work in japan, i do not hear anything like that ever. even when the issue was raised. im not joking
richardhaw 1 year ago
Even though the design is older, T90 is much better in total quality. Especially the suspension and the control of canon while moving. The problem of Korean tank is its reliability because of made in Korea. Nobody wants to use Korean crap in the real war. By the way, Korea has struggling upgrading this K1 crap to K2 crap for the difficulty of making engine system. I heard that Korea succeeded in copying German Tank before. However, it seems like Koreans were not smart enough.
NoNoSpice 1 year ago
@NoNoSpice k1 is actually older.... but k1 has better capability
MsTheTerminator 10 months ago
Only one way to solve this dispute! Let's organise a "cage fight" for the two tanks! The winner takes all!
weissman2000 1 year ago
1500 K1, K1-A1 served in Korea,but T90 is ??
HamZang1124 1 year ago
what's the name of the song,please!
Pupeto1886 1 year ago
stupid korean nationalism. keep masturbating
richardhaw 1 year ago
Don't matter does it what matters is the k2 vs the type 10
starknight97 1 year ago
k1a1's sight picture is prototype.. before mass production
kambokdol 1 year ago
For money and versus only like soviet onld tanks like T-52 or T-72 by some terrorists, id say K1A1.
MultiB0MbER 1 year ago
JAPANESE DUMBSHITS. while you hate korea, we know that you are worthless NEETS. So shut the fxxk up and go find a work.
It does not make any difference to actual data even if you yell on the internet.
pjh3228 1 year ago
台湾陸軍は、どんな戦車を採用するんだろう。
韓国はセールスしてないの?
seirodate 1 year ago
Korea lost, because crash easy, like rocket. ha-ha.
Gmove02 1 year ago
@Gmove02 korean tank isnt better. its not better than t-72 most likely
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
So, Give diagram or trustful source instead keep showing meaningless visual bluster.
zakard114 1 year ago
droitega
"They way that u compare the gears is WRONG. give diagrams :/ u posted a random noise (dont know even if its leopards) and u compare it vith video LOL"
watch?v=_B-4XOh_r1I&feature=related
zakard114 1 year ago
No matter whatever evaluated from Japanese is all determined by 'Visual'. That's it, Visual tells everything for their theory(??). Don't get me wrong because I'm treating this matter without any bias; I simply don't understand where the such assurance is came from despite lack of any trustful suggestion & source or information regard of the issue.
zakard114 1 year ago
bro no mater witch nation bullied weapons i like to tell that not to use for mankind keep those save to fight for alien enemy we need all you brother to fight to save human kind....
Eminem8Jasonak90sl 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Firepower : K1A1 = Type90
Protection : Type90 > K1A1
Mobility : Type90 > K1A1
Total : Type90 > K1A1
b7a2ryusei 1 year ago 13
Comment removed
MsTheTerminator 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Firepower : K1A1 = Type90
Protection : Type90 > K1A1
Mobility : Type90 > K1A1
*Total : Type90 > K1A1
b7a2ryusei 1 year ago
K1A1
Firepower : K276 (≧DM33)
Protection : RHA 350mm?(≦M1Abrams)
Mobility : 53.2t/1200hp 22.6hp/t
b7a2ryusei 1 year ago
Type90
Firepower : JM33 = DM33(Autoloader)
Protection : RHA 800mm?
Mobility : 50.2t/1500hp 29.9hp/t
b7a2ryusei 1 year ago
Comment removed
b7a2ryusei 1 year ago
our chinese tanks are way better than korean tanks.
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
@chinaownseverything you can't say something is better than another unless its proven. But thats just me
You could be right, you could be wrong. Thats why combat proof will only justify/contradict your statement
Porsche1080 1 year ago
@Porsche1080 well. each tank has its ups and down. korean tanks are quality. china tanks is mass produced. and japan tank is kinda decent. so its hard to tell. but an apache can make a difference
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
. k-21 isnt better than puma. also type 90 is better than k1a1 and k-2.
this isnt my opinion but fact. but korea does make real good IFV and tank
chinaownseverything 1 year ago
watch?v=PtxCtg0GBxM
The moving shot of type 90 at 3km targets
Any questions?
deathstrike44 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Japanese TYPE10>TYPE90>>>>>>>∞>>>>>> Chosun K1A1
watch?v=X6qLz2i04_0
CrimeAvenger2 1 year ago 16
The Japanese Type90 is basicly a copy of the Leopald2 tank
Basicly same or very simular status
Why don't the video maker make a vid like , K1A1 VS L2A6 or something?
gunnota 1 year ago
@gunnota Mr.Gook, Describe concretely which patent of Leopard2 used for Tepe90.
watch?v=hheRKClBF7A
CrimeAvenger2 1 year ago
type 90 with 1500 HP would be my choice.
It is also buld shorter this means more manouvrable.
The longer they (tanks) are the more chance the chains derail off the whaiweels when you do a stiff turn in loose sand
I was a tank rider of the Leopard 1
215alessio 1 year ago
xk-2 is good too.
UTube2573 1 year ago
if its a copy from abrams it must be better than type 90...
propose86 2 years ago
Comment removed
arstriker 1 year ago
병신 짱깨들 열폭하기는... ㅋㅋ 실컷 떠들어라, 그래봤자 너낸 Qinks!
DeathSSuk81 2 years ago
k1a1 looks very familiar to another tank...
propose86 2 years ago
M1A2 Abrams gook copy!
1949FUCKUSA 2 years ago
both tanks suck!
Type98/99 can easily defeat both tanks!
Type90 and K1A1 can team up and try to take out a single Type98/99 but the Type98/99 will win!
1949FUCKUSA 2 years ago
Type 98/99 sucks worse than T-90. K1A1 can defeat all of them. Just look at the suspension and gun stabalisation, Korea is up to Western tank standards.
stalkingalizee 2 years ago
T-90 you mean Russian or Japanese Type 90?
Type 98/99, Russian T90, Russian Black Eagle superior to all you anti-communist nation's tanks.
Plus I found out that the K1/K1A1/Type88 was designed by General Dynamics(company that made the Fail-16 Falcon)
1949FUCKUSA 2 years ago
T-90 means Russian. The Black Eagle was nothing but a T-80 with a jungle net over it.
General Dynamics makes the M1A2 Abrams. Lockheed Martin makes the F-16. Both of which are the most battle proven platforms on the planet.
stalkingalizee 2 years ago
South-korea things they can make big weapons but they have small penis so they haveto shut up!
lachter786 2 years ago
We Chinese have the biggest dick in Asia. And unlike South Korea and Japan we dont take shit from Americunts(Yankee Pig-dogs)
1949FUCKUSA 2 years ago
@1949FUCKUSA
We know that Chinkeys r always using dicks than brains..
That is the reason China has a big cheapest population in this World.
crocreek 2 years ago
Same song asalways......... getting boring.
inamonianim 2 years ago
Do U know the meaning of FPS ?
00GunterProzen00 2 years ago
M!A! is a rip off of the german made leopard 2 which is the most superior tank in the world so my answer is definetley no
DACSHUNDS 2 years ago
In fact upgrades on existing tanks are extremely common worldwide. Israeli made Merkava Mk 4s, germans have their leopard 2A6s, there are so many modernizations on soviet block T-series, US is likely to get M1A3s in the future...It's just plain wrong to say that improving makes tanks unbalanced. ROK have the money and technology to make a new tank, and the design of K1 has aged 20 years since first prototype was developed, so made a completely new one. And you are saying this is wrong?
nedlee1 2 years ago
@arstriker
Well you can say the same thing about the type 90...which had almost no upgrade since it was first deployed. They made TK-X since they couldn't make type 90 any better, so it is a bad tank, according to your logic.
nedlee1 2 years ago
cool
007yeudoi9x 2 years ago
Of course, Type90, I choose.
Basically, K1 is designed to have 105mm gun. K1A1 put 120mm gun by force, so it's said that K1A1 is defective in the shooting accuracy.
On the other hand, Type90's high accuracy shooting is proved at the Yakima, USA.
Moreover, Type90 is absolutely dominant in the armor. The armor of K1A1 is just a trash compared with Type90.
arstriker 2 years ago
No,the K1A1 have a better Armor,they use BOTH the Rheinmetall L/44 Gun,so same Firepower,the K1A1 is from 1988 and the Type90 is from 1990 so he isnt really moderner all in all is the K1A1 better
PringlesSourCreamxD 2 years ago
@arstriker, too bad Japan can't export them due to U.S blocks all Japanese weapons. Stop talking like trash, Korean weapons are far superior than Japanese Coz Koreans allow to export weapons and tested at battle field. Accuracy not have been proven between two yet.
consoleman09 2 years ago
@consoleman09
I dont know which country bought Korean weapons. Turkey bought K2's tech, but in fact, that isnt Korean techs at all.
K1A1 adopted composite armour made in USA. But, do you think the USA give their top secret to the other country?
And, about composite armour, Japan has a top tech in the world. After Type 90 is developed, the USA is requesting an offer of composite armour tech of Japan, but Japan have rejected.
arstriker 2 years ago
And Type90's shooting accuracy is already proven at the Yakima training field, USA. Type90 hit the target 3km over, easily, while they are running. This made the USA be surprised.
arstriker 2 years ago
Basically, to improve performance of existing tank is very difficult. Because, it must break the balance which is made by first design.
I think that Korea failed to improve K1. In the evidence, K1A1 was produced only small number. And then, they have started to develop K2.
I never think Korean weapons far superior than Japan. Because, Korea dont have the techs, money and an experience.
At least, K1A1 is the failure work, it's far worse than any modern tank.
arstriker 2 years ago
LoL, that's pretty much same for Japanese made weapons. There is no global prove of Type 90 is more accurate otherwise Turks wouldn't have purchased Korean tank. Btw, you seems to lack knowledge in Tank. K1A1 is almost same as US's Abraham tank, it means have better armor than Japanese.
consoleman09 2 years ago
OK, you are lack of knowledge, and never investigate fact... That too bad.
>>K1A1 is almost same as US's Abraham tank.
>>K1A1 is almost same as US's Abraham tank.
WHO BELIEVES THAT, EXCEPT FOR KOREAN!
arstriker 2 years ago
@arstriker
And are you american working in the defense industry?
You said who believes that, except for korean but I can say like this.
WHO BELIEVES THAT, EXCEPT FOR JAPS!!
pkt1005 2 years ago
lol, First K1 tank was based from US Abraham tank, it seems you don't have any knowledge of tanks. Korean tanks & armor vehicles are now being exported to overseas, take your insecurity somewhere else. SKorean army is now Asia's best equipped army.
consoleman09 2 years ago
Oh, yeah, wonderful!
arstriker 2 years ago
@arstriker
Of course, K1A1, I choose.
Basically, Type90 is designed to have a landing interception mission against russian army, so Type90 is deployed only in Hokkaido.
Moreover, Type90 can be moved only by railroad because roads in japan is too narrow for running Type90. So japs are developing small and lightweight TK-X, but it can't be compared to K1A1. It is not a MAIN battle tank(MBT)!!. LOL
pkt1005 2 years ago
@pkt1005
Well,well,well...TK-X is not MBT?
OK, you gooks are something different from common people.
Small and lightweight is not the fault but an advantage for mbt.
Russian is developing T-95 which is small and lightweight. And Also US is developing 40t Prototype Tank. Korea cannot only make such a tank because the technology is insufficient.(And your knowledge is insufficient, too)
arstriker 2 years ago
TK-X cannot be compared with K1A1?
Exactly, TK-X is the new-style tank which put high technology in. It cannot be compared with a bungle.
arstriker 2 years ago
수고하십니다.미국에 살고있는데
이런것들에 삶에 힘이 됩니다.
계속 수고해주세요 ^^
아 ,,그리고 궁수님 제가 젤 많이 가는 사이트가 비밀인데 거시서본 아디같은데,맞는게 같네요 .감사합니다!!
kris7895 2 years ago
헐 라젠카 음악이다 ㅋㅋ
그보다 말씀하신게 정말 전부
맞는다고 생각합니다. 좀더 우리전차가
우수하지요..
coolglock19 2 years ago
K1A1 kick Type 90 ass,and K2 Black Panther is much better :-) Great Work South Korea,I love the K1A1!!!
PringlesSourCreamxD 2 years ago
K-1A1 no NBC what's happen??
nordic108 2 years ago
A lack of NBC protection system is K1A1's shortcoming.
So, korea execute improvement of K1A1.
K1A1 PIP have positive pressure system.
sunyerang 2 years ago
@sunyerang Well, they're both having new MBT's. Japan, the type 10, and south korea the K2, black panther.
MegaBuster777 9 months ago
active protection on T 90 its call Arena or Shtora. search for it. i see you soon
LocoRedKixx 2 years ago
you have another guess coming.
this video is about type 90 of japan, not t-90 of russia.
sunyerang 2 years ago
i m very sorry, thank you for the vid.
LocoRedKixx 2 years ago
take a look at Shtora from t 90. i still like t 90 for prtection
LocoRedKixx 2 years ago
?????
sunyerang 2 years ago