@zIncomparable Are you saying that the explanations from the bible that say that a couple of teenagers were going to populate the earth, offer a better and rational explanation about the origins? Stop watching cartoons please!
Carl Sagan - "Our collective free time needs to shift as much as possible to education. Whether you're a young student or finished school long ago, get out to the library whenever you can and work hard to learn everything you can about this world. Each individual and society will benefit from being able to solve more problems and make better decisions. Education is an amazing discovery process that repays you endlessly."
Really people? Come on I believe in science and religion, both complement each other so well in my opinion, but don't go out being rude to what others believe in. I respect you if your an Atheist, a Christian. or what ever you want to believe in. It does not matter to me, just don't ostracize people for their beliefs. That how wars get started, lets all except each other for who and what we are without being so hostile.
@DJSchousen wars get started over resources religion is just a flimsy pretext and a good wedge to divide people to ursurp power and their minds. I've never met a true musilm christian or bhudist because none of them can follow the teachings in this rock hard reality world.
@pedrolieksmudkips The first foundational falsehood of the classroom creationists in America is trying to convince people that evolution contradicts theism. It doesn't necessarily. I know people who believe in both. I'm an atheist but I know several pro science religious folks.
This is so wonderful and so much better than 99% of the crap on TV now. What did we have today? How aliens helped the Nazi’s create rockets (the V2) and how close Hitler was to have aircraft that could fly via the use of anti gravity drives. No wonder so many people have such strange ideas about the value of science when they force fed such total rubbish.
Intelligent life and its evolution is the most epic story of all time. Which is more comforting view? Returning the "stuff of life" to the cosmos at death, which guarantees future generations of life; or an afterlife that guarantees human-like happiness and the continuance of our current biological personality for all eternity. I'd take the afterlife version, but unfortunately there is no proof whatsoever. The proven truth is both beautiful and disquieting at the same time.
With current main stream thinking and science its true there is no way to know through those means. Alternate explanations mention we all had a hand in creating the universe as a game to play or something to do billions of years ago. Life would be pretty boring without a physical universe. Until we got trapped in it.
A supreme being made the big bang, spent time designing the universe. I don't believe it was all by accident. There is too much going on to all just accidentally be put together. That is where science and religion differ, when science comes around to the idea of a creator then both can co exist. Neither have all the answers and both have been very wrong in the past.
@videonaj no, where religion and science differ, is that science is welcome to correction. Being proven wrong is just as valuable as being proven correct. Science looks at things from an unbiased standpoint, legitimately thirsting for knowledge. Religion only seeks to validate itself and constantly misrepresents science to make its own case. Open your mind, stop letting religion blind you, and you will be amazed by all the knowledge that was sitting there right in front of you.
@OnokuMongbat Science is very important especially when applied to help man kind. Scientists that dont have a moral foundation will work for the wrong people and produce destructive products. So philosophy and spiritualism will always have a place in an advanced society. Yet each religion is different so you cant put them under one umbrella. I'll bet anything advanced societies out there including the visitors have a spiritual foundation of some kind. Else they'd destroy us in a second.
@videonaj i would like to point out that "accidents" have been known to create pretty awsome things like X-rays, penecilin, and even popsicles (and much much more). So it shouldn't come as much of a surprise that we came along via accident. Seems cooler in my opinion.
@UndeadAppleTree I would also like to point out accidents discovered those things not create then. To create something as big and amazing as this universe requires more than an accident. Which is self evidence in the way it all works and our abilities to be creators ourselves.
@videonaj I take it you see this universe as "perfectly designed" or some shit. That's fine, i guess, but i dnt see it that way. I see a Universe tht is full of random chaos, most being 'accidents' like the creation of the elements inside stars, or the explosions (and release of these elements) from these stars. Even stars are like accidents. All they r is a load of cosmic crap being pulled together via graviy. That's how i see it, if you see it otherwise, i understand y u would, i just dnt.
@UndeadAppleTree One of the amazing these about creation is you can design it to be random. I don't believe a god or a supreme being is guiding every atom in the universe. Just like we can create programs that do random things. You just have to look earlier and ask the questions, who let off the big fart known as the big bang? Who created the physical universe in the first place.
@videonaj If it's so random though, does it really need a creator, it could have randomly come about to begin with. There might have been a creator, maybe some sort of alien scientist conducting a 'universe creating' experiment, but there's no way we could ever know for sure.
@actoyman Of course we are more than flesh, there is also energy within us, but not what you think, there is a small amount of electricity in the body, mostly by nerve and brain cells who use it to send signals throughout the body, but if you are thinking that there is a soul, all i can say is that there is no such thing. We are capable of detecting subatomic particles like quarks and gluon plasma, but no souls or spirits, this is just fanciful wishful thinking by humans who fear death.
Carl Sagan was an extraordinary man and a true scientist: enlightened, humanist and visionary. A brilliant example, his spirit and passion should inspire everyone with the love for knowledge, humanity, our planet and the cosmos.
@giorgos00k Yes he was all and that.But he[Carl Sagan] never understood thing's in a spiritual level.He was a man of science and he was far from understanding thing's spiritually.
Check out the following video entitled: Faith Science Antônio Peters in which the mathematician and Pastor Antônio dos Santos Peters interprets, by means of scientific knowledge, situations from the Bible in a most plausible and rational way,within the scope of human knowledge, analyzing spiritual phenomena in our universe, to enable a better and clearer understanding of the message contained within the Bible.
@Knossos22 this video of course isn't specific there is far to much data to fit in 5 minutes /watch?v=v8nYTJf62sE for a easy to understand explanation
@Knossos22 reactions on the earth such as lightning caused organic molecules in the early waters of earth to react with each other: one formed that was able to replicate itself
@WhiteManJumpin Quite right, we are using 2 different definitions of time travel. For me, that version of time travel isn't time travel at all, you are simply sitting in a time machine for a second (relative to you), but to me you are sitting in there for a very long time. It is the same as cryogenics, except you are not frozen. You are just bumping your consciousness to a different point in time, but you still continue to to exist all the while. Not my idea of time travel.
@WhiteManJumpin Fine, paradox arguments aside, the satellites are still observable, it doesn't push the satellite into the future, it merely slows the satellite's "time" down. You can say that the satellite's "experience" was slowed, but you can't say the satellite itself went into the future. It is still whizzing around right now above our heads. Your idea of time travel isn't time travel per se, it is just a way to "skip" around.
@WhiteManJumpin Also, if anything you did during time travel affected your own time, i.e. destroying the Mona Lisa and then going back to your time to find out it is not there, time travel would not be possible, because ANYTHING you did would have that effect. Scaring a cat, would cause it to go somewhere else it wasn't before, and affect someone, who would in turn effect more people, and eventually the entire Earth. Even moving air molecules in ways they weren't before would have that effect.
@WhiteManJumpin Well, that's not actually time travel. The satellites are moving faster, which, through the Tau factor, cause their "time" to slow, making them "age" slower. But they didn't actually travel through time. If you could view a satellite continuously, not impeded by Earth in your line of site, you can't say that it traveled through time at all, because you've been watching it. The clock on board slowed, but no actual time travel occurred.
@WhiteManJumpin our universe is all that we know, or ever will know, in our lifetime. Time travel and a multiple universe theory is as absurd as religion.
I heard somewhere, that there is a end to the universe. but what if the universe was part of something, or and there is somehing beyon universes. It not hard to uderstand that if there was nothing all what started it, how did it begin with a massive ball of energy , how shes was there in the first place ?
The ignorant always "dislike" that which enlightens and removes them from a preconceived, ignorant mindset. This man was a GREAT teacher and proponent for environmental conservation and scientific PROGRESS.
Funny because the guy who created this video "carl Sagan" thought otherwise you probably only know about Christianity all this blends with Hinduism perfectly and all of the time since the big bang is small in the time scales that are explained.
Hinduism explains a Big bounce theory which is now been invented and more popular than the big bang theory.
you have got the word religion and fairy tale mixed up in your brain
4:49 he says "we are the way for the cosmos to know itself"
@topbluffa1 It is a bit audacious to claim that hinduism "explains" the big bounce theory don't you think? I'm not going to go on wikipedia and recite a couple of facts to make myself seem informed, but recalling my knowledge of the matter, doesn't hindu cosmology approach the manner from a humanistic perspective? I mean, wouldn't that be a bit steep to claim that the universe is bent to farmiliar human experiences?
@topbluffa1 What i am saying is, why would a higher being 'live' (or sleep or die, however the story goes)? How could we possibly picture this? How could we verify it? I will say that the hindu approach to the matter is far more believable (and scientifically feasibile) than say the christian myth.
@HumanTargetAus Reality is the greatest story ever told. It's a story constructed by many writers. Chapters to the story are lost, revised, and new ones added all the time. Science gives us a glimpse of some of the old, long lost chapters and writes first drafts for the new ones.
@HumanTargetAus The only problem with the "science behind our creation" is that it begins with an event that defies the laws of physics. Origin stories are relevant for comic book characters; survival is relevant for humanity.
@HumanTargetAus Absolutely!!! Especially because of the fact that it is the truth of our actual reality; something I have always questioned and wondered about and recieved generally unsatisfying answers from adults.
The main reason people stick with religion(believe in a creator) is that it gives them hope that there is life after dead. On scientific side, you are gone forever after dead. People don't like to hear that.
Suppose that a creation myth were true, and this were not. The pure elegance and beauty of "this" makes me want to believe this over any creation myth.
Here is approx a 4 to 1 ratio, in favor of Atheists'. There isn't 4 Atheists to every Religious person on the planet. Religious people far out way Atheists. This suggests that an Atheist is more likely to watch these types of videos in attempt to understand their Universe. An Atheist is more likely to exercise the brain and ask the questions. Religious people have been programmed not to think, its been done for them. I see a crucial divide in intellectual growth within the same species.
every concept of this universe is a product of the contents within it. picking apart the details of it will never explain how it came to be - time being one of the products it could be said that the universe existed prior to its current form in a realm were time was not a property. the cause of its expansion into its current form is not explained and honestly i dont think it can ever be explained.
so i still wonder why every fucking day. i know you scientists try real hard so, good luck!
@VederchiHarry this does not explain the beginning, this explains everything that happend to form what we see today. the universe did not start with the big bang. the universe just changed for some reason - reason unknown. the causality of the universe banging in a big way is never explained, yet humans pride themselves on the theory of big bang when it explains only what happens and not why it happend. time is a product of this universe - causality befor time existed??? say whattt???
@VederchiHarry lol yeah buddy! i hate when they say in the beginning because their is no finite beginning... and if the universe was something smaller then an atom - what was outside of it? i have read the universe has no center, no edge, no beginning and no ending. it just dont sit well with me, i could believe the universe never ends, but i wonder what layers of existance sandwhich it all together... i still think its not very large and i think much more exists.
@matthias2986 i mean, a dust mite would say the earth was infinite, unfortunately dust mites cant even see a fraction of the world. i think that is partly the problem humans have, our limited ability to preceive... we will never get to see it all, know it all, but hey, at least we get to think about it, unlike the dust mite who is not realy conscious of much anything..
@matthias2986 I believe that humans are merely one of MANY other intelligent life out there. We all play a part in self-awareness for a constantly changing entity. I believe that the Universe may have existed before the era of stars & that it will exist far after all the stars are gone as it turns into something new, but that this Universal Consciousness is constantly growing. We're connected to this Consciousness so it can experience this phase of its evolution from many linear perspectives.
@VederchiHarry Scientists just say that spacetime is a part of our universe and created in the big bang which is entirely true. It doesn't go against the hypothesis that there is some higher "stage" on which things play out.
Big bang theory is based on evidence, anything that goes beyond it is an educated guess at best, (religious myths at worst)
@DutchNordic My point is just that it is impossible to go as far back as ''the beginning''... (meaning time 0). We can get very close to that point but we will NEVER reach it! I know that spacetime is part of our universe! I was just talking about TIME itself! There is no proof that it existed before BigBang, but... there is no proof that it didn't exist before BB! and when U try to talk about this to scientists... they just say... U dont understand..everything was created in BB!
@VederchiHarry When scientists say that everything was created in the big bang they just mean everything in our universe including the laws of physics and spacetime. They are not suggesting that our universe is all there is.
It means that from our place in the universe it doesn't make sense to think back in a linear way to a point before the big bang.
@DutchNordic Actually today. Many theoretical physicists have thrown out the theory of the big bang and have looked for more specific and scientific answers to the creation of our universe. Here's the link to the BBC documentary thing with all the famous renowned scientist people.
@Dubonjierugi Ill check it out. But i think the big bang theory wont change so much anymore that it doesn't deserve the name "big bang" It will just be refined as they gather more evidence for inflation, dark matter, etc.
@VederchiHarry if time was not yet formed or in motion prior to the BB then the bang would have never happend, it would take TIME for everything leading up to the bang plus the time it took for the bang to take place.... time has not beginning it is infinite just like the universe, the universe didnt do anything but change form, something that has probably happend infinity times already.
@DutchNordic if spacetime began with the big bang, how did the events leading up to the bang happen? wouldnt they have needed time to do what they did? time must have existed prior to the BB right?
@matthias2986 Nobody knows this for sure. The old view is that the big bang started it all but more and more scientists believe that there is something bigger than our universe.
The multiverse is a popular hypothesis because it also seems an answer to the "finetuning problem"
@matthias2986 Its funny to see that Carl Sagans view leaves open the possibility of this hypothesis even though this is a very old video. "if we say that god always existed, why not save a step and conclude that the universe always existed" With the universe he means all that there is. Whatever the cause (if there is such a thing) , its still a part of everything.
Science starts with the facts and builds opinions based on that. Religion starts with opinions and tries desperately to make the evidence fit, and often ignores that which does not.
@brennancrazy the universe did not start with the big bang. the universe only changed for some reason - reason unknown. the causality of the universe banging in a big way is never explained, yet humans pride themselves on the theory of big bang when it explains only what happens and not why it happend. time is a product of this universe - causality befor time existed??? say whattt??? i creator is still a possible explaination. unlike the bible - i only say that a creator may be the cause.
@brennancrazy knowing just how tiny we are inside the universe, the universe may actualy be tiny also... when looked apon by something else... life may exist outside of the universe in a huge way, this universe could be the energy from a dream of something real real real big... compared to us anyhow. i just dont like to believe someone elses crazy dreamed up idea of what they think caused all this stuff...
yes, we will look back and smirk at the narrow scope of our view as it is today. this will be the same smirk we've always had as science grew upon itself- one discovery at a time- giving us the rich depth of understanding we are so fortunate to have now. all this time time, of course, religion offered nothing to this progress. in fact, religion often did its best to stunt the growth of science. thank 'god' it failed. we will look back and smirk, because we will continue to progress.
Religion gave us much, but also took much. Science gave us much, and, also took much from us. Philosophy. simple as this. Try to think or pray, but avoiding the lies.
This is a very interesting video, and to the best of my knowledge I guess its true (even though I'm a Christain) but I still think in a hundred years people will look back on this and think it was just as stupid as how many of us view the creation stories.
I personally like to think we are just a little more than pot luck chemistry and that's my choice and the best thing about it is that you atheist don't need to worry about me, if you do your just the next version of the spanish inquisition
I would give anything to be able to look upon our universe from 'the outside'.
Some people want to cry when they try to comprehend its scale, but nothing gives me more pleasure. Our tiny rock, no more than a pebble, spinning through a rapidly expanding space in near silence, unaware of its place and unnaccepting of its insignificance. Sheer ignorance
To believe that the earth was created in a few days is to undermine critical thought. Repeatable results, empirical evidence, and mathematics wasn't enough to convince that the bible may be slightly in error? I suppose the Copernican revolution wasn't enough to convince people the bible was probably wrong...
To believe that the vastness and beauty of the universe could have been created in 6 days by an invisible, mysterious being would be pissing on Carl Sagan's grave, and every scientific achievement ever.
I still don't get it how people can be so obsessed with various human constructs such as religion, "God", Jesus etc. It's pretty obvious to anyone with a higher level of natural wisdom and perception that "divine" is already embedded in the universe, usually in the form of processes such as negative entropy (order emerging from chaos, IOW, after 13 billion years, intelligence and self reflection emerging from hydrogen atoms and pure energy). We are the cosmos and life itself, children of cosmos.
People seem to think the beauty of this makes it improbable.. but beauty is a human concept, it makes sense for us to develop our sense of beauty in such a way that the universe we grew up in appears beautiful to us. Of course it's beautiful, what's the alternative?
and then a white fat preacher comes and tells you that all of this is bullshit and you're a worthless sack of shit that needs to have an imaginary friend called Jesus and pay 10% of all your income to this fat motherfucker in order to give meaning to your life....
I wish that there would be next Carl who would say : "Fuck you creationists, cultists, pseudoscientiests, come and learn real science". Religion is good in self consideration, morale exploration, but when it becomes lie, which kills science, then it is enough.
I am a physicist myself. In my teens I've been greatly inspired by Carl Sagan TV series. Even as a 10 year old I did not understand a lot of it, but some strong interest have always put me to my chair and make me watch Cosmos. Later, when I was studying physics it took much time to comprehend some spectacular great ideas. Anyway it becomes pretty obvious that it is hard to understand it in the way of even modern human thinking. Thank you for this video clip.It really returned me to my old days.
Where did that huge explosion come from? I have a theory. Imagine this: 2 sheets of paper smacked together, it makes a noise. Now imagine 2 entire universes smacking together. On such a large scale, it does more than make a lot of noise. It grinds together like metal on a chalk board. However, there is one problem with my theory I cannot explain: Where did those universes come from?
On a related note, Alot of theories about the creation of the universe are crazyish
@steptocheese same here, I just can't put it into words as well as he does. A funny side note his wife is on the world council to decriminalize pot always, and reform.
Reality and science is far more beautiful and great than anything mankind can ever possibly dream up. Everything we have dreamed up, nature beat us to, and went well beyond us and our small, insignificant minds.
to answer that god created everything, is an answer for the closed minded people scared to rlly admit the truth, we are an insignificant species lost among the 4.5 x 10^23 stars contained in the universe. To say that our planet is a "Gods" chosen planet out of the 6.12 x 10^24 planets is pure lunacy. Open your eyes people. Drakes equation alone shows in the milky way alone there are as many as 10000 intelligent communicating planets. This is fact, false beliefs created out of fear are not.
The real story of the universe and our origins is infinitely better than to simply explain everything through God. I would like to add that as matter in the universe has always made its road towards higher complexity, it has met many obstacles. And as we, humans, are the most complex stage of matter known in the universe, we must be careful as the God and supernatural delusion is the current obstacle the universe is facing towards a high complexity.
Another thought...It appears the universe runs its course...all will one day collapse and start again...and then people one very long time in the future evolve and work out a new 13.7 billion years since the new creations....
But God has always been there(?) with His new creations(?)
Where are the old ones ? The ones that share heaven with him since infinity?
GOD is REAL
zIncomparable 3 weeks ago
@zIncomparable prove it
Rebun24 5 days ago
@zIncomparable Are you saying that the explanations from the bible that say that a couple of teenagers were going to populate the earth, offer a better and rational explanation about the origins? Stop watching cartoons please!
MultiManriquez 2 days ago
difference between science and religion explained perfectly. one religious man finds and artefact and says
religion: how can I make up ideas to convert this artefact and support my cult.
and one scientist says
science: wat facts and observations can I pull out of this artefact.
RECKOGNING1 1 month ago
Truly legendary man..... Goodbye Carl ... :´(
Mirrodin82 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Carl Sagan - "Our collective free time needs to shift as much as possible to education. Whether you're a young student or finished school long ago, get out to the library whenever you can and work hard to learn everything you can about this world. Each individual and society will benefit from being able to solve more problems and make better decisions. Education is an amazing discovery process that repays you endlessly."
TheLogicalBrain 3 months ago
Vangelis and Carl Sagan FTW!
(Sorry, I just had to say it.)
Scifimaster92 3 months ago
The real creation story owns all man made myths!
DutchNordic 4 months ago
@DutchNordic None of them even come close to the beauty of the real beginning.
cr4ckb4by 3 months ago
Really people? Come on I believe in science and religion, both complement each other so well in my opinion, but don't go out being rude to what others believe in. I respect you if your an Atheist, a Christian. or what ever you want to believe in. It does not matter to me, just don't ostracize people for their beliefs. That how wars get started, lets all except each other for who and what we are without being so hostile.
DJSchousen 4 months ago in playlist Carl Sagan Videos
@DJSchousen wars get started over resources religion is just a flimsy pretext and a good wedge to divide people to ursurp power and their minds. I've never met a true musilm christian or bhudist because none of them can follow the teachings in this rock hard reality world.
Gantzer1 2 months ago 2
That was the greatest thing I have ever witnessed.
xUkFaTaLiTyX 4 months ago 2
How can something be so epic?
MrCupron 4 months ago 5
I JUST GOT MIND FUCKED .
BONA925FIDE 4 months ago
people that dislike this are either religious or on the wrong page.
TheSulphuric 5 months ago 9
@TheSulphuric well i mean, i'm religious, but i can say that science is just the working of a god.
pedrolieksmudkips 1 month ago
@pedrolieksmudkips The first foundational falsehood of the classroom creationists in America is trying to convince people that evolution contradicts theism. It doesn't necessarily. I know people who believe in both. I'm an atheist but I know several pro science religious folks.
Pilaf1984 1 month ago
This is so wonderful and so much better than 99% of the crap on TV now. What did we have today? How aliens helped the Nazi’s create rockets (the V2) and how close Hitler was to have aircraft that could fly via the use of anti gravity drives. No wonder so many people have such strange ideas about the value of science when they force fed such total rubbish.
mikeismad61 5 months ago 3
Intelligent life and its evolution is the most epic story of all time. Which is more comforting view? Returning the "stuff of life" to the cosmos at death, which guarantees future generations of life; or an afterlife that guarantees human-like happiness and the continuance of our current biological personality for all eternity. I'd take the afterlife version, but unfortunately there is no proof whatsoever. The proven truth is both beautiful and disquieting at the same time.
aeroripper 5 months ago 3
With current main stream thinking and science its true there is no way to know through those means. Alternate explanations mention we all had a hand in creating the universe as a game to play or something to do billions of years ago. Life would be pretty boring without a physical universe. Until we got trapped in it.
videonaj 6 months ago
que treta, até parece que lá tiveram para dizer tal coisa.
portusim75 6 months ago
12 people are religious trolls!
deeppurple28 6 months ago 2
i really hope when i die there is some one or something that will explain the meaning and purpose of everything
pinoy228 6 months ago
@pinoy228 LOL I think the same thing man!!! :O Oh shit this is awesome!
RichtoffenRoach 6 months ago
It is interesting how our continous universe starts to turn into logical operations as things become smaller.
choobie12 6 months ago
carl sagan, the only scientist i would listen to..
jacksn245 6 months ago
A supreme being made the big bang, spent time designing the universe. I don't believe it was all by accident. There is too much going on to all just accidentally be put together. That is where science and religion differ, when science comes around to the idea of a creator then both can co exist. Neither have all the answers and both have been very wrong in the past.
videonaj 7 months ago
@videonaj no, where religion and science differ, is that science is welcome to correction. Being proven wrong is just as valuable as being proven correct. Science looks at things from an unbiased standpoint, legitimately thirsting for knowledge. Religion only seeks to validate itself and constantly misrepresents science to make its own case. Open your mind, stop letting religion blind you, and you will be amazed by all the knowledge that was sitting there right in front of you.
OnokuMongbat 6 months ago
@OnokuMongbat Science is very important especially when applied to help man kind. Scientists that dont have a moral foundation will work for the wrong people and produce destructive products. So philosophy and spiritualism will always have a place in an advanced society. Yet each religion is different so you cant put them under one umbrella. I'll bet anything advanced societies out there including the visitors have a spiritual foundation of some kind. Else they'd destroy us in a second.
videonaj 6 months ago
@videonaj i would like to point out that "accidents" have been known to create pretty awsome things like X-rays, penecilin, and even popsicles (and much much more). So it shouldn't come as much of a surprise that we came along via accident. Seems cooler in my opinion.
UndeadAppleTree 6 months ago 3
@UndeadAppleTree I would also like to point out accidents discovered those things not create then. To create something as big and amazing as this universe requires more than an accident. Which is self evidence in the way it all works and our abilities to be creators ourselves.
videonaj 6 months ago
@videonaj I take it you see this universe as "perfectly designed" or some shit. That's fine, i guess, but i dnt see it that way. I see a Universe tht is full of random chaos, most being 'accidents' like the creation of the elements inside stars, or the explosions (and release of these elements) from these stars. Even stars are like accidents. All they r is a load of cosmic crap being pulled together via graviy. That's how i see it, if you see it otherwise, i understand y u would, i just dnt.
UndeadAppleTree 6 months ago 2
@UndeadAppleTree One of the amazing these about creation is you can design it to be random. I don't believe a god or a supreme being is guiding every atom in the universe. Just like we can create programs that do random things. You just have to look earlier and ask the questions, who let off the big fart known as the big bang? Who created the physical universe in the first place.
videonaj 6 months ago
@videonaj If it's so random though, does it really need a creator, it could have randomly come about to begin with. There might have been a creator, maybe some sort of alien scientist conducting a 'universe creating' experiment, but there's no way we could ever know for sure.
UndeadAppleTree 6 months ago
Comment removed
DutchNordic 7 months ago 3
I love this voice, it's just amazing
Gnometower 8 months ago
No matter what you think we are more than flesh....
actoyman 8 months ago
@actoyman Well of course. There's some bone, water and ligaments in there too. And it's all made of star stuff.
Pilaf1984 8 months ago
@actoyman Of course we are more than flesh, there is also energy within us, but not what you think, there is a small amount of electricity in the body, mostly by nerve and brain cells who use it to send signals throughout the body, but if you are thinking that there is a soul, all i can say is that there is no such thing. We are capable of detecting subatomic particles like quarks and gluon plasma, but no souls or spirits, this is just fanciful wishful thinking by humans who fear death.
bombarderoazul 8 months ago
If you check out m theory and string theory u will find that the big bang theory can be disproved.
anotherperson58 9 months ago
@anotherperson58
No, M-Theory does not disprove the Big Bang. In M-Theory membrane collisions are the reason for the Big bangs for each universe.
LlamaInk 8 months ago
Comment removed
Rebun24 9 months ago
Carl Sagan was an extraordinary man and a true scientist: enlightened, humanist and visionary. A brilliant example, his spirit and passion should inspire everyone with the love for knowledge, humanity, our planet and the cosmos.
giorgos00k 9 months ago 8
@giorgos00k Yes he was all and that.But he[Carl Sagan] never understood thing's in a spiritual level.He was a man of science and he was far from understanding thing's spiritually.
TOLTECAAZTECA 8 months ago
@TOLTECAAZTECA This video is far more spiritual than any of the quasi literate bronze age superstitions you cling to.
Pilaf1984 8 months ago
@Pilaf1984 The only thing i '''cling to''' is your sister and mother.
TOLTECAAZTECA 8 months ago
@TOLTECAAZTECA DADDY? IS IT REALLY YOU?
ThePeyoteCoyote 8 months ago
@giorgos00k Yes it is :)
RichtoffenRoach 7 months ago
@giorgos00k i think what Carl wanted most was to inspire others... which is great
Ooel3ctrooO 3 months ago
.... epic !
Stewiehleba 9 months ago
2:45 Rock and metal. I knew how fundemental it was for the origin of life, but know I know what authority to cite as reference :)
FreeScience 9 months ago 3
@ameiko, i would suggest googling "Panspermia" ... this is the most popular theory of our time.
StottMikel 9 months ago
@StottMikel No, I'm pretty sure it's almost universally agreed that life on Earth arose through abiogenesis.
yoyomoneymon 9 months ago
Comment removed
unkhl3 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out the following video entitled: Faith Science Antônio Peters in which the mathematician and Pastor Antônio dos Santos Peters interprets, by means of scientific knowledge, situations from the Bible in a most plausible and rational way,within the scope of human knowledge, analyzing spiritual phenomena in our universe, to enable a better and clearer understanding of the message contained within the Bible.
RabieFam 10 months ago
the universe tends to complexity to destruction again, a cycle of birth and death, heaven and hell.
elchippe 10 months ago
Go Sagan!
anticorncob6 10 months ago
Comment removed
unkhl3 10 months ago
And at 3:10 we have something so fanciful , and very "unscientific".
ameiko76 11 months ago
@ameiko76
How would you explain the origin of DNA ?
Knossos22 10 months ago
@Knossos22 this video of course isn't specific there is far to much data to fit in 5 minutes /watch?v=v8nYTJf62sE for a easy to understand explanation
judoisoww 9 months ago
@judoisoww 3:10 - Seems Sagan was summarizing the model that the scientific method has produced?
Knossos22 9 months ago
@Knossos22 reactions on the earth such as lightning caused organic molecules in the early waters of earth to react with each other: one formed that was able to replicate itself
Rebun24 8 months ago
@WhiteManJumpin Quite right, we are using 2 different definitions of time travel. For me, that version of time travel isn't time travel at all, you are simply sitting in a time machine for a second (relative to you), but to me you are sitting in there for a very long time. It is the same as cryogenics, except you are not frozen. You are just bumping your consciousness to a different point in time, but you still continue to to exist all the while. Not my idea of time travel.
impiccolomofo 11 months ago
@WhiteManJumpin Fine, paradox arguments aside, the satellites are still observable, it doesn't push the satellite into the future, it merely slows the satellite's "time" down. You can say that the satellite's "experience" was slowed, but you can't say the satellite itself went into the future. It is still whizzing around right now above our heads. Your idea of time travel isn't time travel per se, it is just a way to "skip" around.
impiccolomofo 11 months ago
@WhiteManJumpin Also, if anything you did during time travel affected your own time, i.e. destroying the Mona Lisa and then going back to your time to find out it is not there, time travel would not be possible, because ANYTHING you did would have that effect. Scaring a cat, would cause it to go somewhere else it wasn't before, and affect someone, who would in turn effect more people, and eventually the entire Earth. Even moving air molecules in ways they weren't before would have that effect.
impiccolomofo 11 months ago
@WhiteManJumpin Well, that's not actually time travel. The satellites are moving faster, which, through the Tau factor, cause their "time" to slow, making them "age" slower. But they didn't actually travel through time. If you could view a satellite continuously, not impeded by Earth in your line of site, you can't say that it traveled through time at all, because you've been watching it. The clock on board slowed, but no actual time travel occurred.
impiccolomofo 11 months ago
The music was as much a part of this show as the information. Fantastic!
Claymoor83 11 months ago
this animation from 3:48 is just great! I always wanted to see something like that.
teramasz 11 months ago
@WhiteManJumpin our universe is all that we know, or ever will know, in our lifetime. Time travel and a multiple universe theory is as absurd as religion.
YoureRacist 1 year ago
This is pure ecstasy
Nakkikassi 1 year ago
Scientific Poetry.
pythor2 1 year ago 3
Madventures theme in beginning the clip..Damn i love Space stuff and i want know more and more about it =)
Makaronimano 1 year ago
9 ppl aren t made of star stuff.
deadgent 1 year ago 40
Comment removed
To411u 3 months ago
I heard somewhere, that there is a end to the universe. but what if the universe was part of something, or and there is somehing beyon universes. It not hard to uderstand that if there was nothing all what started it, how did it begin with a massive ball of energy , how shes was there in the first place ?
Mi4Slayer 1 year ago
it don't get any better than that! amazing well put by carl
damo010 1 year ago
The ignorant always "dislike" that which enlightens and removes them from a preconceived, ignorant mindset. This man was a GREAT teacher and proponent for environmental conservation and scientific PROGRESS.
zenpaganwarrior 1 year ago 3
This is The Great Mystery
BeamSurfer 1 year ago
9 people are having a hard time comprehending the matrials presented by Mr. Sagan.
mathlover111 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mathlover111
why, what is so hard to grasp?
kylewolfe1988 1 year ago
@WhiteManJumpin I agree with you, but i think you meant to say galaxies instead of planets.
DutchNordic 1 year ago
The science behind our creation is far more beautiful than any religious creation myth
HumanTargetAus 1 year ago 133
@HumanTargetAus
Funny because the guy who created this video "carl Sagan" thought otherwise you probably only know about Christianity all this blends with Hinduism perfectly and all of the time since the big bang is small in the time scales that are explained.
Hinduism explains a Big bounce theory which is now been invented and more popular than the big bang theory.
you have got the word religion and fairy tale mixed up in your brain
4:49 he says "we are the way for the cosmos to know itself"
topbluffa1 10 months ago
@topbluffa1 It is a bit audacious to claim that hinduism "explains" the big bounce theory don't you think? I'm not going to go on wikipedia and recite a couple of facts to make myself seem informed, but recalling my knowledge of the matter, doesn't hindu cosmology approach the manner from a humanistic perspective? I mean, wouldn't that be a bit steep to claim that the universe is bent to farmiliar human experiences?
HumanTargetAus 10 months ago
@topbluffa1 What i am saying is, why would a higher being 'live' (or sleep or die, however the story goes)? How could we possibly picture this? How could we verify it? I will say that the hindu approach to the matter is far more believable (and scientifically feasibile) than say the christian myth.
HumanTargetAus 10 months ago
@HumanTargetAus Reality is the greatest story ever told. It's a story constructed by many writers. Chapters to the story are lost, revised, and new ones added all the time. Science gives us a glimpse of some of the old, long lost chapters and writes first drafts for the new ones.
5cr0w 9 months ago 2
@HumanTargetAus The only problem with the "science behind our creation" is that it begins with an event that defies the laws of physics. Origin stories are relevant for comic book characters; survival is relevant for humanity.
k98killer 7 months ago
@HumanTargetAus Absolutely!!! Especially because of the fact that it is the truth of our actual reality; something I have always questioned and wondered about and recieved generally unsatisfying answers from adults.
ZachRose88 6 months ago
@HumanTargetAus Religion has short changed the universe severley.
ThanksDoctorThoctor 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The main reason people stick with religion(believe in a creator) is that it gives them hope that there is life after dead. On scientific side, you are gone forever after dead. People don't like to hear that.
nbsbb2009 1 year ago
Suppose that a creation myth were true, and this were not. The pure elegance and beauty of "this" makes me want to believe this over any creation myth.
robx0r 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is approx a 4 to 1 ratio, in favor of Atheists'. There isn't 4 Atheists to every Religious person on the planet. Religious people far out way Atheists. This suggests that an Atheist is more likely to watch these types of videos in attempt to understand their Universe. An Atheist is more likely to exercise the brain and ask the questions. Religious people have been programmed not to think, its been done for them. I see a crucial divide in intellectual growth within the same species.
Exsposing 1 year ago
Comment removed
Exsposing 1 year ago
Comment removed
Exsposing 1 year ago
every concept of this universe is a product of the contents within it. picking apart the details of it will never explain how it came to be - time being one of the products it could be said that the universe existed prior to its current form in a realm were time was not a property. the cause of its expansion into its current form is not explained and honestly i dont think it can ever be explained.
so i still wonder why every fucking day. i know you scientists try real hard so, good luck!
matthias2986 1 year ago
There can not be ''a beginning'' as ''Time 0'' is mathematicly impossible!
VederchiHarry 1 year ago
@VederchiHarry this does not explain the beginning, this explains everything that happend to form what we see today. the universe did not start with the big bang. the universe just changed for some reason - reason unknown. the causality of the universe banging in a big way is never explained, yet humans pride themselves on the theory of big bang when it explains only what happens and not why it happend. time is a product of this universe - causality befor time existed??? say whattt???
matthias2986 1 year ago
@matthias2986 0:16 Sagan says : let me tell You a story about ''the beginning" some 15 billions years ago.
He schould have said : " the beginning of what we call the Big Bang" . Looks like we agree on this one.
But when You say "time is a product of our universe".. You just repeat what today's ''scientists" like to spread without any proof!!!
One day, we will discover light older than 15 billions years. I have no proof, but like the Stock Exchange Experts say ''we'll have to wait in see"
VederchiHarry 1 year ago
@VederchiHarry lol yeah buddy! i hate when they say in the beginning because their is no finite beginning... and if the universe was something smaller then an atom - what was outside of it? i have read the universe has no center, no edge, no beginning and no ending. it just dont sit well with me, i could believe the universe never ends, but i wonder what layers of existance sandwhich it all together... i still think its not very large and i think much more exists.
matthias2986 1 year ago
@matthias2986 i mean, a dust mite would say the earth was infinite, unfortunately dust mites cant even see a fraction of the world. i think that is partly the problem humans have, our limited ability to preceive... we will never get to see it all, know it all, but hey, at least we get to think about it, unlike the dust mite who is not realy conscious of much anything..
matthias2986 1 year ago
@matthias2986 I believe that humans are merely one of MANY other intelligent life out there. We all play a part in self-awareness for a constantly changing entity. I believe that the Universe may have existed before the era of stars & that it will exist far after all the stars are gone as it turns into something new, but that this Universal Consciousness is constantly growing. We're connected to this Consciousness so it can experience this phase of its evolution from many linear perspectives.
GrowTheTruth 1 year ago
@VederchiHarry Scientists just say that spacetime is a part of our universe and created in the big bang which is entirely true. It doesn't go against the hypothesis that there is some higher "stage" on which things play out.
Big bang theory is based on evidence, anything that goes beyond it is an educated guess at best, (religious myths at worst)
DutchNordic 1 year ago
@DutchNordic My point is just that it is impossible to go as far back as ''the beginning''... (meaning time 0). We can get very close to that point but we will NEVER reach it! I know that spacetime is part of our universe! I was just talking about TIME itself! There is no proof that it existed before BigBang, but... there is no proof that it didn't exist before BB! and when U try to talk about this to scientists... they just say... U dont understand..everything was created in BB!
VederchiHarry 1 year ago
@VederchiHarry When scientists say that everything was created in the big bang they just mean everything in our universe including the laws of physics and spacetime. They are not suggesting that our universe is all there is.
It means that from our place in the universe it doesn't make sense to think back in a linear way to a point before the big bang.
DutchNordic 1 year ago
@DutchNordic Actually today. Many theoretical physicists have thrown out the theory of the big bang and have looked for more specific and scientific answers to the creation of our universe. Here's the link to the BBC documentary thing with all the famous renowned scientist people.
Dubonjierugi 1 year ago
@Dubonjierugi Ill check it out. But i think the big bang theory wont change so much anymore that it doesn't deserve the name "big bang" It will just be refined as they gather more evidence for inflation, dark matter, etc.
DutchNordic 1 year ago
Just search in youtube BBC Horizon 2010: What Happened Before the Big Bang
Dubonjierugi 1 year ago
@VederchiHarry if time was not yet formed or in motion prior to the BB then the bang would have never happend, it would take TIME for everything leading up to the bang plus the time it took for the bang to take place.... time has not beginning it is infinite just like the universe, the universe didnt do anything but change form, something that has probably happend infinity times already.
matthias2986 1 year ago
@DutchNordic if spacetime began with the big bang, how did the events leading up to the bang happen? wouldnt they have needed time to do what they did? time must have existed prior to the BB right?
matthias2986 1 year ago
@matthias2986 Nobody knows this for sure. The old view is that the big bang started it all but more and more scientists believe that there is something bigger than our universe.
The multiverse is a popular hypothesis because it also seems an answer to the "finetuning problem"
DutchNordic 1 year ago
@matthias2986 Its funny to see that Carl Sagans view leaves open the possibility of this hypothesis even though this is a very old video. "if we say that god always existed, why not save a step and conclude that the universe always existed" With the universe he means all that there is. Whatever the cause (if there is such a thing) , its still a part of everything.
DutchNordic 1 year ago
This week has been very shitty. I have been feeling somewhat depressed all week. Watching this really comforting, it reminds me of how lucky we are.
HumanTargetAus 1 year ago
Definitely wish i could shake this mans hand =(
SquishyPants9000 1 year ago
Science starts with the facts and builds opinions based on that. Religion starts with opinions and tries desperately to make the evidence fit, and often ignores that which does not.
Pilaf1984 1 year ago 3
@Pilaf1984 Good comment.
seanan79 1 year ago
and was he around to see this himself, or is he just making this up because the only other option is a supernatural being?
FabiusMaximus96 1 year ago
this is porn to me
british123able 1 year ago 3
Like the GENIUS Stephen Hawking once said. or blinked..... Science can not prove nor disprove "god" or a "creator" it simlpy makes "him" unnecessary.
brennancrazy 1 year ago
@brennancrazy the universe did not start with the big bang. the universe only changed for some reason - reason unknown. the causality of the universe banging in a big way is never explained, yet humans pride themselves on the theory of big bang when it explains only what happens and not why it happend. time is a product of this universe - causality befor time existed??? say whattt??? i creator is still a possible explaination. unlike the bible - i only say that a creator may be the cause.
matthias2986 1 year ago
@brennancrazy knowing just how tiny we are inside the universe, the universe may actualy be tiny also... when looked apon by something else... life may exist outside of the universe in a huge way, this universe could be the energy from a dream of something real real real big... compared to us anyhow. i just dont like to believe someone elses crazy dreamed up idea of what they think caused all this stuff...
matthias2986 1 year ago
not true
i2k44 1 year ago
Creation myths are just laughable.
CRISNCHIPS12398 1 year ago
yes, we will look back and smirk at the narrow scope of our view as it is today. this will be the same smirk we've always had as science grew upon itself- one discovery at a time- giving us the rich depth of understanding we are so fortunate to have now. all this time time, of course, religion offered nothing to this progress. in fact, religion often did its best to stunt the growth of science. thank 'god' it failed. we will look back and smirk, because we will continue to progress.
belodeau 1 year ago
Religion gave us much, but also took much. Science gave us much, and, also took much from us. Philosophy. simple as this. Try to think or pray, but avoiding the lies.
Atrahasis7 1 year ago 2
This is a very interesting video, and to the best of my knowledge I guess its true (even though I'm a Christain) but I still think in a hundred years people will look back on this and think it was just as stupid as how many of us view the creation stories.
I personally like to think we are just a little more than pot luck chemistry and that's my choice and the best thing about it is that you atheist don't need to worry about me, if you do your just the next version of the spanish inquisition
nathanblackcock 1 year ago
@nathanblackcock wat
PopcornColonelx 1 year ago
@nathanblackcock
-vengence will be a bitch.
tictactoechicken123 1 year ago
@nathanblackcock Us atheists may not have to worry about you but there are plenty of reasons why we should be worried.
gibozzo 1 year ago
I would give anything to be able to look upon our universe from 'the outside'.
Some people want to cry when they try to comprehend its scale, but nothing gives me more pleasure. Our tiny rock, no more than a pebble, spinning through a rapidly expanding space in near silence, unaware of its place and unnaccepting of its insignificance. Sheer ignorance
bluemoonrising26 1 year ago
@bluemoonrising26
I want to cry when I think about it, but that doesn't mean it doesn't give me pleasure, I guess it's a strange reaction.
bradmanthethird 1 year ago
To believe that the earth was created in a few days is to undermine critical thought. Repeatable results, empirical evidence, and mathematics wasn't enough to convince that the bible may be slightly in error? I suppose the Copernican revolution wasn't enough to convince people the bible was probably wrong...
Torkulguy 1 year ago
To believe that the vastness and beauty of the universe could have been created in 6 days by an invisible, mysterious being would be pissing on Carl Sagan's grave, and every scientific achievement ever.
JizzOnAPetriDish 1 year ago
I still don't get it how people can be so obsessed with various human constructs such as religion, "God", Jesus etc. It's pretty obvious to anyone with a higher level of natural wisdom and perception that "divine" is already embedded in the universe, usually in the form of processes such as negative entropy (order emerging from chaos, IOW, after 13 billion years, intelligence and self reflection emerging from hydrogen atoms and pure energy). We are the cosmos and life itself, children of cosmos.
bluenina 1 year ago
It is time for us to establish a morality which is based on science, logic and human wisdom embbeded in empathy.
SoopSoopa 1 year ago
I love these videos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hey does any one know the name of the melody?
icannotgetany 1 year ago
@icannotgetany the song is called Alpha by vangelis.
bombarderoazul 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bombarderoazul
LISTEN UP GUYS OCTOBER 2, 2010
REAL LIFE PANDORA FOUND
THIS SHIT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND, HISTORY IS IN THE MAKING AS WE SPEAK
SCIENTISTS DISCOVERED THE 1ST EARTH-LIKE PLANET AND SAY ITS NEAR 100% CHANCE FOR LIFE ON IT
GO TO YOUTUBE USER : XKUNX
TO GET THE SCOOP
THIS IS HOT SHIT
THE WORLD'S WAY OF THINKING MAY BE CHANGED IF LIFE IS DISCOVERED
GIVE THIS COMMENT A THUMBS UP TO SPREAD AWARENESS
TribalRapper 1 year ago
People seem to think the beauty of this makes it improbable.. but beauty is a human concept, it makes sense for us to develop our sense of beauty in such a way that the universe we grew up in appears beautiful to us. Of course it's beautiful, what's the alternative?
new2hackin 1 year ago
google Doe's Account
devopi 1 year ago
and then a white fat preacher comes and tells you that all of this is bullshit and you're a worthless sack of shit that needs to have an imaginary friend called Jesus and pay 10% of all your income to this fat motherfucker in order to give meaning to your life....
disgusting is the only word i have for religion.
Uteko95 1 year ago
beautiful.
ladySEH 1 year ago
Carl Sagan has not died becuase his message lives on, after his physical Death.
TheKiemaster 1 year ago 38
@TheKiemaster What are you talking about? Carl Sagan is not dead... He is just in the fourth dimension.
Dougie11730 1 year ago
when people take action in the name of there god it means they lost a little hope in praying...
boikpark 1 year ago
Life is improbable and beautiful as it stands. Why must we feel entitled to so much more than rationality dictates?
ascott58 1 year ago
We need to educate the world and consign religion and ridiculous "god" claims to history - or better still, the FICTION section of the library.
goldstead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there is no god or gods...
BoldestInfidel 1 year ago
I wish that there would be next Carl who would say : "Fuck you creationists, cultists, pseudoscientiests, come and learn real science". Religion is good in self consideration, morale exploration, but when it becomes lie, which kills science, then it is enough.
chronius9 1 year ago 2
@chronius9 well plenty of people say that, but I don't think Carl Sagan would be so crude
he was a nice guy! you might like Richard Dawkins, i know i do
glemmstengal 1 year ago 2
@chronius9
Apart from the 'fuck', Sagan did say that on many occasions. Sagan's Cosmos series should be made mandatory on schools, then it would also sink in.
didjabringadidjalong 1 year ago
I am a physicist myself. In my teens I've been greatly inspired by Carl Sagan TV series. Even as a 10 year old I did not understand a lot of it, but some strong interest have always put me to my chair and make me watch Cosmos. Later, when I was studying physics it took much time to comprehend some spectacular great ideas. Anyway it becomes pretty obvious that it is hard to understand it in the way of even modern human thinking. Thank you for this video clip.It really returned me to my old days.
1200Megatons 1 year ago
Where did that huge explosion come from? I have a theory. Imagine this: 2 sheets of paper smacked together, it makes a noise. Now imagine 2 entire universes smacking together. On such a large scale, it does more than make a lot of noise. It grinds together like metal on a chalk board. However, there is one problem with my theory I cannot explain: Where did those universes come from?
On a related note, Alot of theories about the creation of the universe are crazyish
I Know what i'm talking about.
Relinies 1 year ago
@Relinies You say this as if you invented the entire Multiple Worlds Theory or something.
We've all known about this.
RexFromDefgab 1 year ago
... and answers is... that...
God does not exist...
God is a terrible myth
jdeleca 1 year ago
this is what carl sagan thinks about when hes stoned
steptocheese 1 year ago 3
@steptocheese same here, I just can't put it into words as well as he does. A funny side note his wife is on the world council to decriminalize pot always, and reform.
Think about that for a second....
rontayan 1 year ago
We are a way for the cosmos to know itself.
Reality and science is far more beautiful and great than anything mankind can ever possibly dream up. Everything we have dreamed up, nature beat us to, and went well beyond us and our small, insignificant minds.
spartacandream 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrJohnthedoe 1 year ago
Thank you Carl
Noobcs 1 year ago 25
can we please talk about religion in the comments section of religious videos?
LeiMagnus 1 year ago 2
@LeiMagnus I couldn't have said it better myself.
VideoJargon 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused... I thought that The Big Bang wasn't an explosion? That's what I got from other scientific videos anyway.
mymatryoshka 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrJohnthedoe 1 year ago
Beats the heck out of Genesis.
ickiepoo 1 year ago
R.I.P CARL.
RepublicanNatio 1 year ago
to answer that god created everything, is an answer for the closed minded people scared to rlly admit the truth, we are an insignificant species lost among the 4.5 x 10^23 stars contained in the universe. To say that our planet is a "Gods" chosen planet out of the 6.12 x 10^24 planets is pure lunacy. Open your eyes people. Drakes equation alone shows in the milky way alone there are as many as 10000 intelligent communicating planets. This is fact, false beliefs created out of fear are not.
GTO19020 1 year ago
Beautifully amazing.
DaveWBK 1 year ago
The real story of the universe and our origins is infinitely better than to simply explain everything through God. I would like to add that as matter in the universe has always made its road towards higher complexity, it has met many obstacles. And as we, humans, are the most complex stage of matter known in the universe, we must be careful as the God and supernatural delusion is the current obstacle the universe is facing towards a high complexity.
2CSST2 1 year ago
@2CSST2 How can you say that humans are the most complex stage of matter in the universe? That is almost as small-minded as religious fundamentalists
Mordekai1 1 year ago 2
my arse!
josetogan 1 year ago
google Doe's Account, mindblowing.
Yellowwatts 1 year ago
(correction if you are reading carefully...)
line 5 previous post: ..."with his OLD creations"
imagine back to infinity????? (more than a few Angels!!!!)
enniopat 1 year ago
Another thought...It appears the universe runs its course...all will one day collapse and start again...and then people one very long time in the future evolve and work out a new 13.7 billion years since the new creations....
But God has always been there(?) with His new creations(?)
Where are the old ones ? The ones that share heaven with him since infinity?
Did He not create man in His earlier creations?
even