Fox and Friends Responds to the Latest Gibbs Attacks!

[pixilladesigns1]

many of you are missing the point; it's not the government's place to try to make that kind of delineation; we're not in some banana republic in south america; that's like some conservative slamming a blogger for espousing his opinion in an opinion column, it's not appropriate

[EncinoRecords]

@pixilladesigns1 i love that you think the point is exactly what the brown haired guy whos not steve duci thinks the point is

[frewof]

because is nooootttttttt!!!!!!!!,is a propaganda machine for the extreme right ,

[AtlasShruggery]

Faux News is just the propaganda arm of the Republican Party.

Faux News spent months pimping the Teabaggers. And just last year, Faux Newsers like Beck and Hannity were still crowing about the Bush Boom.

[GreenEyeBluey]

And they declare a state of emergency over this H1N1? It is no such thing!..What an abuse of power!

[GreenEyeBluey]

Snorp (& Morons like him) calls down Fox for misinformation? They need to check out the 'lack of information & the errors in what CNN & MSLSD report on. Libs have most all networks & newspapers in their pockets. Fox is the ONLY network that asks questions that I & half the country wants to know the answers to, yet Fox is the enemy?..Do these Obamaits have their head in the sand that they cant see what is going on in this corrupt Marxist administration?

Uneducated, half witted fools!

[snorp73]

Greeneye, you boob - I am here defending Fox. Please read my posts a bit more carefully. Thanks ;-)

[snorp73]

Funny point to make here, if you listen to liberal strategists who have become utter apologists for Obama in regard to his failed economic and national security strategies (not to mention the fact that he hasn't even fulfilled one promise to his nutty base), those aologists are STILL blaming Bush.

We have to hand it to Obama on the subject of originality here. He's moved on from blaming Bush to blaming Fox News and Rush Limbaugh - so it's not all bad news.

[indianluvsguitar]

awesome! I love to see republicans whining about this!

These idiots fall for Obama's antics each and every time... so fucking predictable.

[rizvisa1]

When you plan to correct this "Just why were Olbermann and Maddow at a press briefing anyhow". This is either misinformation at the minimum or eve a blatant lie . It was not a press briefing. Other thing is that there were other guys too. All liberals. Just as in jan there was one gathering with conservatives.

[Mduduzi22]

Fox News doesn't even report a murder right, they do nothing but lie about everything.

[jxh261]

Steve Doocey looks like the biggest faggott on the planet.

[rvisaac]

I have always said that Obama is a smart guy. But when he accepted the Nobel Prize it proved that his Ego is larger than his intellect. Anyone that can't take criticism has an ego problem.

[rvisaac]

Waa Waa Waa Get real Liberals a lot of people don't agree with your agenda.

[rvisaac]

What really boils me is public radio. It is so biased for the left that it can not be called a news outlet. And my taxes support it. What a bunch of cry babies. Fox is the only TV news that isn't liberal.

[doomsoth]

Fox is not a news organization. lol They back none of their claims with evidence; they commentate.

[mahasw777]

And MSNBC doesn't??

[UrR2KBA]

Obama just wants his 8pm RIM JOB from K. Olbermann, then promptly followed by a 9pm reach around from his main man R. Maddow.

He can't handle the truth nor tolerates those that refuse to lay prostrate before him. I don't agree with Fox all the time, but I find very little common ground with most other news outlets.

[out2gtme]

Its an obamanation is what it is !

[FreedomILove]

obamunism

[mymagdalena13]

Did he not go on David Letterman? What the hell is the difference. That is Damn Dumb!

[snorp73]

Moreover; why can't one liberal substantially refute the facts of the PEW poll AND Helen Thomas's view of the White House...Helen Thomas has been there forever and is not a conservative by any means.

[lordbahamut75]

Once again Fox Entertainment not reporting the truth: "The guest list included Sean Hannity, Neal Boortz, Michael Medved, Laura Ingraham, and Mike Gallagher. (Rush Limbaugh was unable to attend.)" So this fake fake fake outrage over Olbermann and Maddow attending is ridiculous and absolutely asinine

[snorp73]

Where is your proof of this allegation? Are the list of invited guests listed on the White House website?

[Neoconhater]

It is called hypocrisy and lying, Fox knows all of those listed above went to the White House to get a talk from Dumbya about pumping up his war on tarror.

[DillonX]

I've turned in FAUX News in The Morning a number of times since Barack was elected and these three A-HOLES have done nothing but blast Barack as they're doing here.

[Dhimmicrats]

He should be blasted, right off the planet. The moron is stepping right on the rights of the free press! Regardless of if you agree with fox or not.

[daisymom4]

obamacorn does give many reasons to blast him ;)

[ToddonCapeCod]

Better drink the Kool Aid and fall in line with the pseudo-messiah, or you're on his enemies list!

as Chris Wallace said, this administration is a bunch of whining crybabies

[LonewolfXIII]

I assume your just one of the many looking for any BS reason to justify why your scowling. But when its gets right down to it you just hate democracy. You didnt want him as President and although your guy lost fair and square rather then acting like a patriot and falling behind your President you do whatever you can to denounce him. And yet for what reason? Where has he slipped up? Is he the reason were broke? Is he not atleast trying to improve the country? Ignorance is not becoming I promise u

[expatted]

Bunch of fuckin' whiners.

FAUX is not news, it's NOISE.

[daisymom4]

noise with truth/facts!

[SaltyCaptianEcuador]

FAUX NEWS what a joke

[gnarlysky]

Can someone let me know who did that poll? Q Research?

[ThomasHawkwood]

Pew Research Center

[gawdpdx]

All one has to do is point to Fox's blatant promotion of the teabagger events. Not just coverage, but outright cheerleading. They have no credibility. Quite crying and lying and act like a news organization and then I'll reconsider my thoughts about Fox.

[snorp73]

They do not cheerlead, they merely REPORT IT while the rest of the MSM says nothing.....you just exuded why liberals are terrified of Fox though or a true uncensored outlet for American news.

[rakrobn]

Yeah, right they ACTIVELY PROMOTE the tea parties and then LIE and say other channels didn't cover it in their ad, USING a picture from CNN.

[sushinibbler]

Nothing wrong with tea parties. No taxation without representation. NOBODY in Congress is representin, thus you have tea parties. I don't get why everyone like Janeane Garafalo and Chris Matthews get upset that people are fed up with big government. They have a right to assemble if they so choose. This isn't Venezuela (yet).

[rakrobn]

sushinibbler, you DO have taxation WITH representation. You have elected officials dumbass. Just bc they don't vote how you want, doesn't mean you have taxation without representation. The solution is to vote for someone different if you don't like your current representation. During colonial times, the colonies had no actual elected officials in England in deciding which taxes to institute.

[sushinibbler]

The solution, rakrobn, is to get ACORN completely out of the election process, voter registration or otherwise. WTF is your problem? If ACORN can go out and protest on the corner of some CEO's house, you can damned well be sure I can go out and shout down this administration. DUMB-ASS. Oh, and I have two teabags for you, dickweed. :D

[rakrobn]

Right, it's all ACORN's fault. Keep sucking the GOP's ballsack. But as a teabagger you're used to that right? It must be hard talking with your fellow conservative's teabags in your mouth. It's nice to know your mouth is more active than the neurons of your brain.

[sushinibbler]

My point exactly. ACORN is a problem rakrobn. D-bag liberal. Two tea bags for you, dickweed. 0\/0

[rakrobn]

I was being sarcastic you inbred hick. It's obvious you don't understand context fucktard. Not surprised - you must have been homeschooled.

[sushinibbler]

Duhr-har-har. Look at rakrobn. She-he is so smart. Like Stephen Hawking. Duhr-her.

[sushinibbler]

And I don't know what f-ing planet you are from, rak. I'm TYPING, not TALKING. Who are you, fucking Stephen Hawking or something? Do you talk into your fucking Commodore 64, space cadet?

[rakrobn]

I'm not talking about typing now FUCKtard. I am talking about when you talk normally (or what you call talking). Once again, you can't detect context. FAIL.

[sushinibbler]

Does it sound like a speak-n-spell when your computer "talks" rakrobn? :D

[sushinibbler]

Duhr-her. Rakrobn can TALK 20 words per minute. Sign this one up for ACORN.

[rakrobn]

It must be the teabaggers balls in your mouth that is limiting the oxygen to your brain hence your inability to detect context and sarcasm.

[sushinibbler]

Type this on your speak and spell, rakrobn: EYE YAM WEE TODD ET EYE YAM SOFA KING WEE TODD ETT.

[NewYorkViolets]

how old are you and what level of education to you have?

[sushinibbler]

Why Violets, are you part of the ACORN gestapo or something? Why do tea parties piss you libs off so much? Your President sucks. If his lips are moving, he's usually lying. Or he has those goose-stepping Linda Douglass or David Axelrod lying for him. You are pathetic. How old are you, simpleton?

[snorp73]

Where is the proof of this allegation, I would like to see it for myself.....it better be more than a Daily Kos link.

[ToddonCapeCod]

all one has to do is spend 15 minutes on a site such as Newsbusters or Media Research Center, and you will see the rest of the media is nothing but cheerleaders for the pseudo-messiah

Talk about a lack of credibility!!

[gawdpdx]

Yawn. Those 2 sites are nothing but opinion, looking for examples to prove their point. Try to come up with something a little less biased.

[daisymom4]

So true!

[witchwild]

I think the reason why the WH has made this negative analysis is becos Fox commentators are *UN-AMERICAN*!

Unpatriotic, traitorous, anti-gov, slandering, lying UN-AMERICANS!! Instead of being 'for' the ppl, re: healthcare, climate change etc. Fox fights, it promotes dissent; it uses inflammatory rhetoric; it is *not fair & balanced* at all! The Fox message is generally sick, twisted & dishonest.

And that's why I imagine the President of the United States of America washes his hands of them.

[Neoconhater]

And Dumbya had Hannity and the rest of the regressive crew at the White House to pump up the "War on Terror".

YAWN!!

[witchwild]

neoconhater:

Exactly!!

[ToddonCapeCod]

Hey, Neo: the Acme Strait Jacket Company called; your order is in!!

[thereallurker]

GW's White House froze out MSNBC. These False News reporters are whiny babies.

[SoonerCubby]

GW's White House froze out MSNBC? Got proof of that? When?

[ToddonCapeCod]

Yeah... all those people on MSNBC, like Olbermann, Matthews and Maddow -- real beacons of integrity in their reporting!

Please!

[OolTube02]

MSNBC don't claim to be fair and balanced -- OR a news program, unbiased or otherwise. They do what they do without lying about what they are...

This isn't about Fox News doing anything illegal anyway. The First Amendment guarantees people's right to lie until their trousers combust. This is simply about calling them out on what they are. And calling a liar a liar is also protected by the First Amendment. The White House is perfectly in its right to do that.

[toneo2001]

Why even bother though???? Obama is still campaigning and that is why. He is more interested in polls and opinion than actually do his job of getting the economy moving again. Instead he is catering to every far left loon and their pet causes. This man is a dyed in the wool, thin skinned Acorn community organizer that is stuck in his own world where he thinks everyone should just love him and his agenda. Many, many of us do not.

[OolTube02]

Unfortunately opinions and polls decide whether he gets his healthcare reform and other legislation through. If the people are not on his side then the House and Senate won't be. So advertising his policies is ALL about getting the economy moving again. Nothing bankrupts more people than healthcare costs, for instance.

The last thing he needs is a hostile TV network sabotaging him without even a public dialog about whether they're biased against him or not...

[uconnfb74]

um i dont know if you have ever read the constitution, where the ammendments come from. But it gives explicit rights to the government and moreover the executive branch. And it doesnt say they can call out whoever they want, i believe that would be called abusive political power, which is talked about extensively. But maybe your one of the ignorant americans that has no idea what he is talking about. Not suprising, you prob voted for this clown.

[OolTube02]

Shutting the network down, going Hugo Chavez on it, that would be an abuse of the Constitution. But simply using the bully pulpit to call a spade a spade is perfectly legal.

They're not saying that Fox News doesn't have the right to exist, after all. They're just telling the journalists covering them that they're treating Fox News as what they are -- a part of the opposition, not an objective reporter. And they suggest, not command, that the other news outlets do the same...

[valgehiir]

those 3 are like puppies, clueless, annoying, adorable

[fakepatriot]

FOX NEWS NOT NEWS

[pmesser1]

As long as Fox pins the buffoon obama & his marxists/socialist Mao loving bitches, I am cool with Fox. All you losers that the kos & huffpo sent over here to comment are jokes just like obama. I bet obama can't wait to get out of the kitchen as that whiney bitch has not accomplished 1 thing & lies- transparent, no earmarks/lobbyists- please. I am glad Fox slams the other fake news channels- must make u huffpo, kos, & obama drones pissed! You Rock Fox! Keep bringing in the money, & ratings!

[robertmike57]

wah wah wah, Doucheybag is a creationist. That's a step below retards.

[snorp73]

And to think, something actually created you. Ever notice how atheists are more extremist than believers are these days?

[robertmike57]

Biology books and porno films explain everything for how everyone was created. Bibles and Korans are more good for toilet paper than anything else. Bet if I made a YT video wiping my ass with a Koran I'd prove religious shitbags are the scum of the earth.

[snorp73]

And again, assuming I believe in God - you are the one equating the value of a biology book to a porno film to begin with (God, I would hate to see what your bedroom looks/smells like) and talking in such extreme tones about believers. You're on the Dawkins skirt tails and there isn't anything "free" about your thoughts since his books cost about 29.99 a pop.....the point still stands, you are no different than Shirley Phelps Roper, you're batting for a diffferent side of extremism is all.

[robertmike57]

LMAO! I'm simply a heartbeat away from beleiveing in God.

I don't buy Dawkins books, I get them from the library where a half dozen polluting religious tracts fall out, on which I write "God sucks dick" on them and put back in.

I don't picket churches, so I'm nothing like a Roper.

[snorp73]

You're exactly like Roper....you come into a chat room forum having nothing to do with God or beliefs and assert an opinion totally based on your non-believing extremism.

I'm not trying to convince you to believe in God. I've never met you, nor could I care less.....which is precisely the point. You cared enough to generate a discussion, I was merely responding to the extremism.

How about we just have our beliefs and you stop extremely criticizing those who don't share yours?

[Coryscott5]

As usual, all of the facts are totally wrong. And they blame the rest of the media for not checking the facts? Jesus H. Christ!

[snorp73]

General statements like that are reserved for the retards at the White House. If you're going to allege "all of the facts" as being wrong, you should so a little bit more explaining than that.

[Coryscott5]

Ok. Here's a little bit more explaining...facts are wrong because: Fox really isn't a news organization. Even their "news" (not opinion) shows push talking points and obscure and unproven stories from very dubious origins (like WND, etc.).

You really don't have to look too hard to find evidence that this network makes errors, takes liberties, and pushes one specific ideology.

The only reason to not admit it would be that you are just too stupid or lazy to do your own research and thinking.

[snorp73]

That's so intellectually dishonest. NBC had to recant a story - a massive one - on exploding GM trucks last year, CBS has to recant a story and fire Dan Rather for lying about Bush's national service with phony documents. If you are going to take issue with occasional errors and paint those as "lies" by one network, then you best damn well be prepared to prove that CNN or MSNBC has never done this as well - such as their nightly lie on the Willie Horton ad.

[Coryscott5]

Uh, that's two -- from quite a while ago. I count more in this story alone, all in one gulp. Like how they are actually wrong about the dates, activities and the basic facts that were available to them as journalists about the story. It truly is disgraceful and quite transparent. Human mistakes are eventual in any profession -- periodically. But what Fox does is often done intentionally and with glee. And not way back in Willie Horton's century.

[snorp73]

Those were not from "quite a while ago" and you're talking in vague terms here....all the alleged problems in this scene alone without specificity to describe what it is they are doing wrong....the Willie Horton story is something being lied about RIGHT NOW on MSNBC....nothing you can demonstrate on Fox can be proven to be vicious or deliberate attempts to hurt the President with regard to reporting basic news. Your entire post there was vague, whereas I gave specifics of true media deceit.

[snorp73]

The fact is liberals will take whatever little piece of error they can to shine a spotlight of shame onto Rush Limbaugh or Fox News BECAUSE Rush dissents from Obama's policies and Fox News allows the full conservative voice on issues without censor such as MSNBC who won't even have a dissenting viewpoint on Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow's programs..as I said, with NBC, CBS, MSNBC, I can show you real LIES, for Fox you can hand possibly one or two honest errors. But that's it and you know it.

[Coryscott5]

This is disingenuous at best, and not supported by facts. At all. Look for yourself and see. And no, don't go to the Fox website for their assertion. Look up real facts, independent of WND and the like.

And then you state, basically, that even though the info is wrong, you like the message so you'll defend it.

Well, too bloody bad that the facts don't support your opinions. Get over it.

[snorp73]

No I did not say that if info was wrong, I'd defend it....no no no! You are not going to detract from the fact that I was able to demonstrate to you two past MASSIVE deliberate attacks by liberal media with NBC and CBS and one massive on going on right now with MSNBC. I said that ALL news stations who talked 24/7 had a tendency to make mistakes. Those are not what you could make a case of "lies" and "distortions" in a serious court....whereas the ones I provided, you most certainly can.

[Coryscott5]

All you got is two examples from years or decades ago, and Fox puts out more errors in one story. Well, that is MASSIVE isn't it!

There is no use talking to you. You've drunk so much kool-aid that your pee is purple. Facts are no longer useful to you.

[snorp73]

"Facts are no longer useful?" I gave you massive facts - not watered down, not mischaracterized, not lied about. You dismiss them as any good liberal would while simultaneously clutching onto "they make lots of mistakes, they really really do!" without delivering one credible source to back up your drivel.

Of course it's no use talking to me - you wouldn't make it past a 2am courtroom show-judge with this crap!

[Coryscott5]

Ummm, the lies in this report have been pointed out many many times already in this thread. Are you blind? Are you intentionally missing them? Here's one (again): Olbermann and Maddow did not have a nefarious meeting with the White House. They had a lunch. Like the one Obama had with conservative media beforehand. Not like Bush who would only meet conservatives.

That one is from this exact story. Your two examples are years or decades old, and fishy at best. Willie Horton? Puhlease.

[snorp73]

First, a bunch of liberal anti-Fox people like yourself does not constitute what you assert as fact, I would like to see the source in which they - or you - know these things to be lies. Bush did not only meet conservatives....he met even with CIndy Sheehan, an anti-war activist.  The man was not afraid of his opposition....and he never singled out Dan Rather or CBS news when they REALLY DID LIE about him. The exploding GM trucks was recent......

[Coryscott5]

I don't have a dog in your political party game - I am not from the US.

George Bush was isolated from dissent, in a way I've never seen another President isolate himself. If judges didn't play ball, they tried to fire them. If real thinkers got in the way, he'd just hire 150 graduates of Pat Robertson's law school to dumb it down and get an army of Monica Goodlings to do his bidding.

They nicknamed an area of the press corps "Siberia", and never called on it. They planted reporters. C'mon.

[snorp73]

I don't care where your dog is. We have journalists going all the way back to Walter Kronkite and Dan Rather who deliver news with political biases all the time. Yet one network comes out and gives both the liberal and conservative view uncensored and liberals suddenly care about fairness with regard to reporting. That first is a joke, the compounding of that joke is your desperate attempt to claw your way to a coherent defense of the massive three I keep pounding you over the head with.

[Coryscott5]

More lies....Fox does not give both views uncensored. That is a big fat lie, and everyone who isn't a brain dead tea partier knows it. That one is just too much. And your inability to see and accept facts are disturbing.

[snorp73]

Kirsten Powers, Bob Beckel, Geraldo Rivera, Juan Williams, liberal, liberal, liberal - ALL THE TIME! The only difference here is Obama and liberals are a bunch of whiners. They can't take what it is they dish.

[Coryscott5]

All incompetent easy shills. Foils, really. Pathetic attempt to justify this.

[Coryscott5]

The exploding GM trucks story was a minor story from a year ago. Willie Horton is from over 20 years ago.

The Iraq war justification lies were from this decade and continue today with guys like Dick Cheney and his little troll of a daughter. They use Fox to do this, and Fox is only too happy to oblige and promote. Unapologetically.

Fox supported the tea parties to a level that was embarrassing. They make up figures of attendance that are laughed at by every authority on crowd size. On and on.

[snorp73]

Exploding GM trucks was a massive mistake that occured on NBC. Just as Rather's lie occured on CBS...never on Fox could you find something so embarrassingly untrue or viciously false. The fact that today, after years of liberal lies about the American right, you and Obama are crying like sissies over Fox News is so transparent. Who cares if Fox reported on Tea Parties...there were far less people that showed up at Cindy Sheehan's anti war rallies and liberals ate that up!

[Coryscott5]

No, it was not massive. Fox news calls errors like that "Monday".

Just today alone, Fox ran a story interviewing the head of the Chamber of Commerce, and they ran a graphic that said they represented 3 million businesses. It is 300,000. Fox has made this mistake before and here they are making it again even thought the CofC has come out to tell the truth about it after the last time.

But they (and you) never learn. Go away now. It is impossible to use reason with you.

[snorp73]

Yes those were massive in the sense that they were deliberate and intentional - all of them. That is why even liberal CBS fired Dan Rather....Today, Gallup produced a poll citing that more Americans are conservatives than moderate OR liberal...THAT is why Fox is successful. It represents more views of the people while reporting news accurately and being the only station that does not censor the conservative opinion on it. I will not go away, neither will conservatism, and neither will Fox News.

[Coryscott5]

Truth: O'Reilly is the highest rated show on cable news. He gets over 2 million viewers a night. That means, based on the fact that there is over 305 million people in your country, that about 0.7% of the population is watching Fox at the height of their ratings day.

Tell me again about how Fox dominates the culture.

There is almost no one who is willing to call themselves Republican. And the others are even more right than that and therefore irrelevant. Obama won the election. Deal with it.

[snorp73]

You're right about that. "Republican" is not the key word, the word is "conservative." There are plenty of rotten Republicans. There doesn't mean there are any good Democrats...Gallup just released a poll today....40% of Americans identify themselves as "conservative." 37% as "moderate" and 23% as "liberal. Gallup just yesterday released another study showing that Obama's approval is tanking faster than any President since 1953. Again, these are facts - and Fox's audience has only grown.

[Coryscott5]

And everything I said before still matters, and since you can't change fact, that weak rant was all for not.

[snorp73]

And the Wille Horton lie perpetrated by MSNBC is happening NOW. Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann are using a Willie Horton ad NOW to mark exactly when politics began getting ugly - by attempting to repeat a 1988 campaign ad used by GHWB which described liberal insanity for granting furlough to criminals like Horton. One big difference, in 1988, GHWB never used a picture of Horton - a black man. However; the new version sown and remembered by Olberman and Matthews DOES. Stop dancing here.

[Coryscott5]

Lies. I saw the original ad many times, when originally aired. They did show his mug shot. They did call him "Willie" even though no one ever had -- he went by William.

Only a stooge would defend Lee Atwater.

[snorp73]

Amazing how liberals will lie to cover up another lie...NO THEY DID NOT SHOW AN ACTUAL SHOT OF WILLIE HORTON...THAT IS A BLATANT LIE.

The 1988 ad did not show it. No, no, no.

[Coryscott5]

Liar. Defend Lee Atwater some more.

[snorp73]

Has nothing to do with defending anyone. Has everything to do with viewing the actual 1988 commerical ad which MSNBC lies about. You produce an original ad showing Willie Horton (not the flubbed up MSNBC version). It's really quite simple to prove, but the fact is you know you cannot.

[Coryscott5]

I don't have to produce a damned thing. You are the one making the incorrect assertion. Where did you get that idea? World Net Daily? John Gibson? I watched it. I'm not some 16 year old kid commenting on what I saw on an opinion show last week. I watched it when it happened. I saw the dirty tricks they used. And even if your point is valid -- it wouldn't matter. You wouldn't excuse a rapist by saying, "well, he didn't kill her!" It was brutal, and I shouldn't have to tell you that.

[snorp73]

First you do have to produce a credential linking the mocked-up ad produced by Larry McCarthy and denounced by the Bush campaign AFTER Bush's anti-Dukakis-crime ad was released with WHITE MEN going through a revolving door. GHWB did not approve that ad, and you do not see it "paid for by the people for GHWB." The mocked up - independent version - is what MSNBC nightly now is passing off as something done by elected Republicans which is a blatant lie for the 50th time. Even Wikipedia cites this!

[Coryscott5]

Oh, I see now....."WHITE MEN". I'm sorry but I do not provide a platform for people with your hateful perspective.

Goodbye and good luck.

[snorp73]

Ha. Two not-so-clever Hallmark rip-off lines, and one allegation of racism.

Yup, I just won a debate with a liberal again!

Toodles.

[Coryscott5]

Ha. Get so offensive and retarded that people cannot even converse with you, and then claim victory.

Typical of those with your issues.

[snorp73]

Ha. And for the finale, in response to massive facts of irresponsible journalism, your opponent calls you "retarded."

How many signs do you need?

[Coryscott5]

You need to look for one that says "Psychiatrist" you clueless twit. Retarded wasn't accurate. "Mentally Sick" and "Unintelligent" would be more accurate.

[snorp73]

"Mentally sick" or "unintelligent" could describe all of the liberals on CNN and ABC and NBC telling Obama that attacking Fox News is a massive mistake and "really stupid!" When I present you with massive facts and logic regarding true media bias, you buy into the liberal notion that screaming something over and over again with make it true. It never will make it true and Fox's ratings have only gone up because of this - so the joke is on you, buddy.

[Coryscott5]

Uh-huh.  Okay then. Have fun on the Tea Party Express, pschitzo.

[95tahoe1]

is this a news program? or a whining program?

[kurtdawolf]

oh, wait, it did only take 15 seconds for them to strike out. The Pew report was from LAST year! Oh, btw, what does audience demographics have to do with content being "fair and balanced"??

[snorp73]

Who cares if the Pew Report is from last year? But I notice how uncomfortable you are with that report....because liberals for the last FIVE YEARS in their sea of idiocy have always assumed Fox News to be a biased channel. Even the opinion shows always present a counter argument. Michael Moore was on Hannity recently, etc, etc....sad to think we have a President and a White House staff with less balls than Michael Moore, doesn't it?

[kurtdawolf]

Olberman and Maddow were NOT at the "gaggle", they were at a lunchen...god, can these guys get any facts right? They also claimed Newsweek said the WH criticism was "unamerican"...WRONG, Newsweek said Faux news was unamerican...strike two! I'm sure if we listen long enough (oh, 10-15 seconds) there will be a strike three! You're OUT faux news...OUT! game over man!

[snorp73]

Where are your sources for these?

If Olbermann and Maddow had viewers, they could afford their own luncheons.

Oh, excuse me - "lunchens"

[robertmike57]

There's no comparison between paranoid Nixon and Obama. Fuck Fox News and their BS propaganda.

[pmesser1]

robertmike57/p3snooper - Hey u loser drone. Please state some examples to show how wise & articulate u are. This is what these loser Brown Shirts do for the fuehrer obama. They come in with their unintelligent swipes with no facts to discredit the only news organization asking questions. How old are u?? 12? You have to be fucking stupid to hail the buffoon obama who has not accomplished 1 damn thing yet even though the democrats control the house & senate- they won't even vote for his shit!

[p3snooper]

Pox News.

What a joke!

[pmesser1]

The drugged out boy king thinks he can send his jesters out to bring down the only network that is not in the tank for the fuehrer. Fox news beats all others combined. The more the homosexual(Larry Sinclair & Donald Young) druggie Obama squawks, the more ratings Fox gets. Last Thursday, Glenn Beck got more ratings than Matthews, EdShow, Matthews, Olbermann, & Maddow combined. No one is watching the other pathetic, Obama adoring, fake news channels.

[raiiders]

um really?

do they not know what their own slogan means?

fair and balanced doesn't mean 'our audience is balanced' it means that, supposedly, fox news presents a fair and balanced view of the 'news' with no bias either way....

yea right...

[mommalu2614]

i turned on fox for the first time after 911. it took 10 minutes to see what i was missing and that all the other news stations are useless and non thinkers. have not watched any of them since. no wonder their ratings are so awful. all you have to do is watch fox and you are hooked. i am an independent and so are my friends and we all watch fox only

[ret]

Three dummies sittin in a tree

Talkin bout the truth that they can't see

[aqelfaris]

Shave Axelrod's mustache, and give him and Rahm a buzz cut, and they would also look like Haldeman and Erlichman, Nixon's hatchet men. They already sound like them.

[snarkthenews]

cry babies. wah wah wah let's pick on a news station where some of the people don't agree with me. wah wah wah.

[SNUFFsurgeryNEWS]

Madcow and lubluvmen reporters? OK.

Prez Obortion is a FREAK... the Demon's Messiah.

[arkivx1]

Rachel mandow lol and kieth lolberman, reporters lol.

[MooseOfReason]

I was actually surprised by those Pew poll results.

That's pretty cool.

[SoonerCubby]

Yet another statistical fact that Fox News is Fair and Balanced. Those who refuse to believe that do not watch it anyway, and merely cherry pick examples or Youtube clips to "support" their own left-wing viewpoint and supress dissent.

When the facts are there and you actively ignore them, it's called delusion.

[granulorhoek]

I agree whole-heartedly with your delusion definition. But when Fox News, not the commentators, was caught with their pants down PARTICIPATING in the big Tea Party shindig in Washington, it became fact that they don't have journalistic integrity. Ask yourself why a legitimate news agency would feel the need to insist they're 'fair and balanced'. Why would I assume they're not? Because they've proven time and again they're not.

[SoonerCubby]

Are you referring to Beck and Hannity? They're not journalists by their own admission. Every network has their opinion guys. Fox chooses not to hide that fact (unlike MSNBC). You know this if you watch them.

Once again, I refer you to the facts. You can find another at Pew on How Different Media Have Covered the General Election.

They have proven time and again they are indeed fair and balanced, and it is people like their competitors who insist that they're not. So they show the facts.

[mastgrr]

4:16 Hey Doocy, what the hell is your own show then?

[mastgrr]

All I saw for six minutes was three conservatives whining.

[UpperCanada1812]

FOX isn't a news outlet it's one big right wing propaganda BS machine.

[rcehoppe]

fox = poop

[Neoconhater]

Neocon madmen propaganda, Fox is not news, I agree.

[haypenny]

Every time the WH tries to 'marginalize' its critics - the critics become stronger.