Tu-134 V DC-9

[greyderH2]

a Tu-134 at the time of its appearance, was the world's best high-lift system, unless I am mistaken

[Ottonturk]

I think also you may compare Tupolev with old French Caravelll plane)

[ConcordeCentral]

@Ottonturk I guess you could with one of the early Tupolev aircraft

[ConcordeCentral]

@marcnistor4567 Ok thanks for the comment.

[pentogram23]

But I love the Spartan look of the Russian jet...it has character ..as the DC-9 looks like a dumb handsome hunk...hehehehe

[ConcordeCentral]

@pentogram23 yes the tu-134's nose looks rather streamlined!

[sfrenchhorn07]

@pentogram23 Yeah the TU-134 looks like an aircraft that was designed to be a military transport and then someone got the bright idea to install seats instead of cargo tie down points lol. I love the screaming engine noise that that DK-30 turbofans produce!

[ConcordeCentral]

@sfrenchhorn07 It does! It looks like either it needs to be longer or there need to be more windows for some reason.

[badboiant29]

the dc-9 has a bad record :l but its one of my fav planes!

[ConcordeCentral]

@badboiant29 yes, it is a shame it does look so much better than the tu-134

[badboiant29]

@ConcordeCentral Yeah

[alexxed145]

wrong cockpit at 0:55, tu-154

[ConcordeCentral]

@alexxed145 sorry, its just what google brought up for me

[SoloWingF16]

I now fly the MD-90

[ConcordeCentral]

@SoloWingF16 the md-90 is an amazing looking aircraft

[SoloWingF16]

@ConcordeCentral

Thanks man. That means alot. Thats why I quit with the DC-9. The MD-90 gives you nearly twice the salary then that outdated DC-9.

[SoloWingF16]

The TU-134 looks like it is a military bomber

[SoloWingF16]

I used to fly the DC-9 but I think the TU-134 is cooler

[ConcordeCentral]

@SoloWingF16 yeah it looks a lot more sleek

[DeltaEagle7700]

The Tu-134 looks more like a private jet. In capacity-wise, the DC-9 outranks the 134.

[lemmy3001]

DC looks like pregnant

[ConcordeCentral]

yeah i guess it does compared to the tu-134

[AugmentedB737]

Tu-134 is cooler i love it glass nose and landing gear

[ConcordeCentral]

ok thanks, i do think that the glass nose looks really tacky but ur 'the boss'

[zedextreme8177]

In terms of looks and luxury, I would prefer the DC9.

In terms of landing gear design and sound, I would prefer the Tu-134.

I like both of them equally

[ConcordeCentral]

ok thats fair enough

the looks of the dc-9 is amazing and the tu-134's sound is amazing

[FLT111]

ALWAYS DC-9!!!

[ConcordeCentral]

thanks

[d2gizzo]

DC-9 for the simple reason that old Tu's are like flying toasters.

[ConcordeCentral]

yeah look like them as well

[d2gizzo]

Yeah they do. XD

[megaplanefan]

Verry funny laughed and Laughed!!!

[TDJP123]

DC 9

[ConcordeCentral]

thanks it looks so much better than the 134

[TWA021]

agree also

[ConcordeCentral]

yeah it looks whey better

[martinmygg]

agree

[ConcordeCentral]

:) cheers

[coolharry1236]

dc 9 obviously

[ConcordeCentral]

ok thanks