Interesting exchange though. At what point should politicians disengage from the details and allow "staff" to fill in the gaps? In this case, I'm dubious that discussion in a senate committee would be useful in resolving the question about the indexing. That seems more like a question of implementation, not of the policy itself. If the implications are significant when worked out by others, then bring it to a higher level, but I doubt that.
Interesting exchange though. At what point should politicians disengage from the details and allow "staff" to fill in the gaps? In this case, I'm dubious that discussion in a senate committee would be useful in resolving the question about the indexing. That seems more like a question of implementation, not of the policy itself. If the implications are significant when worked out by others, then bring it to a higher level, but I doubt that.
snoktruix 1 year ago
Yes yes yes! Don't give them an inch!
jkkphoto 2 years ago
to rungy07: I read somewhere that 40% of our taxes go to pay the interest on our national debt.
focus21x 2 years ago 4
Not indexed for inflation? Oh great...
BlueSkies360 2 years ago 4
100% of all income tax collected last year paid for bailouts and the wars.
MY TAXES PAID FOR...
1) wars I don't support and oppose
2) bailouts that made Rockefeller/Rothschild owned banks stronger, which I did not want.
and now you want me to spend over a thousand a year for health insurance which I do not need?
NO
I will not pay one dime for health insurance unless you either...
A) end the wars or
B) end the income tax
it's that simple
rungy07 2 years ago
thank you Sen Kyl!!
ginaswo 2 years ago 9