@gigitrue63 These guys have hunted them for thousands if not tens of thousands of years. So unless you are willing to pay for them to resettle in a city then I'm thinking the answer is no.
I would rather someone kill tradition before another polar bear has to suffer! And if tradition doesn't want to die, kill those who just wouldn't leave it alone for fucks sake!
Polar bears have no natural predator, thus killing them is abnormal and have a negative effect in the food chain. Just like killing sharks, bears, lions and tigers.
@10rosegarden14 What are you talking about? Humans are the polar bears natural predator. Natives have been hunting them for a very long time. Due to the small numbers of native hunters the polar bear had maintained a healthy and stable population. Disruptions in their habitat is the biggest threat to the polar bear.
@Morkindie species they rely so heavily on (bears.) They know they must let the life cycle happen. I understand your side especially since Bears are at risk but the Inuits (I think) need to survive also & the P.Bear is their Cow (or lettuce if you're a Veg) I respect your opinion entirely I just think you should check their perspective a bit more because Bears & other Indigenous Species (which are few & far between) are their living. Like I said thats their SuperMart & we need to respect that.
@surfer1211 I respect that they had a sustainable lifestyle long ago. If it weren't for all of the other pressures on polar bears, they might continue their tradition for hundreds of years more. That is not the way the world is. I don't see why I should respect them when they continue to practice a lifestyle that is contributing to the extinction of a species. We all need to cut back and curb our behavior, and these people, as individuals, are doing a great deal of harm. killing the young. : (
@Morkindie I hear you. I noticed that big deal they made in not allowing the scientists messing with the skinning. These people justify this massacres with their "tradition" bullshit, yet they use firearms, motorized vehicles, electricity, fabrics, etc. Jeopardizing the very existence of a species like this is just wrong and immoral.
@Morkindie Their Super Mart is the Ice Sheets. The isles there offer Seals, Walrus, and of course Polar Bears. I understand your side and how because bears are depleting that hunting them should be banned altogether. But I really believe the quotas are enforced and regulated. If they go over it can't be by much but honestly I feel as if the hunters respect and honor the quota. I think they are conscious enough to respect the 30 bear quota because if they go over it they can propagate the...
@Morkindie It is when that's your livelihood. Their hunting is our farming and cattle/chicken slaughter. Expect their really can't farm, so they "farm/slaughter" Polar Bears. That's their food and clothing. Obviously they have more modern clothing as well but "Traditionally," that was their main source. Although Polar Bears are an at risk species, they still need to be hunted for their own survival. It's not like these people can go to the local Super Mart and have steaks to just pick up...
this is amazing im an average person but i enjoy watching these documentaries if only to further expand my knowledge and appreciate the facinating organisms that inhabit our planet
Thus, even by my relatively austere life style -- no car, no daily shower, equipped only with computer, telephone, tv, stereo, small fridge, low-watt light-bulbs, camping stove, ... -- I am one of a BILLION OR SO contributors to the destruction of the environment. I believe that part of the solution is to reduce the population of Earth from its present 7 billion to just around 1 or 2. Starting right now, even if it means fewer clients, fewer voters, fewer church members, ...
if u ever touched one animals with a bad reason, i fucking kill u, i rape ur mother, i choke ur grandma and i kick ur grandpa in the fucking balls, i rape ur children and i shot ur fucking friends in the head u fucking motherfuckers cocksuckerss!!!!!!!!!!
It says that it's thought that polar bears evolved from a population that was trapped in siberia. Right after that, they say they started eating seals. Since when are seals found right in the middle of siberia?
@PBDPBD Since the last major glaciation, when there were inland waterways that contained seals. Today, their descendants live in Lake Baikal, far from any ocean.
@PBDPBD The area on the map, in Siberia, wasn't "ground->ice", there was big areas of liquid water between the open ground and the massive ice of the ice-age, where many seals were trapped too.
Or so the theory goes, as I understand it. Many forms of seals live around the edges of ice-areas, so they would just tag along as the ice goes around.
Those hunters could easily survive eating something else. They shouldn't have been granted permission to kill polar bears just because it's their tradition; we can't afford losing these animals which are already on the edge of extinction...
@vava54own Maybe if they were trapped and starving, yet they have boats and rifles and remain in the frozen North killing an endangered species. Tradition is not a reason. They are not killing JUST to eat.
@Morkindie They are killing for their fur coats as well. By eating these animals, they can better adapt to the cold, by absorbing at least small quantities of the blubber of these animals, as well as using their fur coats, and of course they do need to eat. In such a cold climate, you would need a high fat diet, and likewise, they do not deplete the polar bear populations by hunting them.
@brentlion Yes, yes, I understand the logistics very well. If one were to live in the arctic in the primitive hunter gatherer lifestyle, hunting polar bears would be a no-brainer. However, these people are not living in those conditions. They are simply using a loophole to sell the polar bear's fur. They are not WEARING polar bear fur. They have the opportunity to leave, but they continue to hunt an endangered species. The situation is not sustainable. We should not allow this special pleading.
@Morkindie They actually do wear the polar bear`s fur. You can even see one of them wearing one in this very vid. There are some cases, where, if you kill off a certain part of a population, they raise in numbers. Kinda like killing old male lions......not to say that i agree with the killing of these animals.......
@brentlion I guess I missed the polar bear suit. I also failed to see their kayaks and spears. If one kills all of the non-producing males, it stands to reason that there will be more resources for the females to survive. That is not what they are doing. They are killing females and the young.
@Morkindie Neither, you, nor i, fully understand all of the reasons why killing a certain group of these may cause an increase an the overall population size....so, i don`t pretend to.
@Morkindie if you are referring to the footage at 6.25min in, that is clearly a dog sent out, not a cub, look closer you can see the long bushy tail curled upward, golden fur and the ambling movement as it excitedly is attempting to subdue/wear out the bear. Be serious really. When hunting not all dogs would be part of the team.
@vgrasomni No, I was referring to the bears that they were carving up. It is not a tiny cub that one would pick up and feed with a bottle, but it is not fully grown. There are certain rules to sustainable hunting. But when a creature is endangered from human's non-hunting behavior, hunting becomes unsustainable no matter how it is practiced.
@Morkindie True, I couldn't agree more that hunting a top predator who has naturally lower numbers due to -among other aspects, the range of the prey and amount of prey required, makes it unsustainable, especially if their genetic diversity is low. It is tricky when people say they need such a species to survive in a land. As controversial as it is, humans do not have the right to send other species extinct. As well as the effect it can have in an ecosystems services it make logical sense.
@vgrasomni true but they are very limited to their hunting and the Inuit take everything and also have been doing it for generations they dont just kill for sport this is a job for many to feed their families
@AtheistCause They are not hunting for survival. If they wanted to survive they would leave that frozen waste land they live in. They have boats. The scientists offered them money. They stay because they are stuck in their culture, and they see their traditions as more important than the survival of polar bears.
@Morkindie There are quotas for hunting polar bears, seals, whales etc.; as was made evident in the programme, what is most dangerous to polar bears are pollution and global warming. I think it's unfortunate that you think they should give up what they have been practicing, sustainably, for hundreds of years because we in the "modern" world are causing the decline of their prey. It's very easy to say "well, why don't they just stop?" if it's not your culture being criticised.
@erikakharada What quota could be reasonable when the animal is endangered? Also It is not like I am suggesting that they stop hunting so that the rest of us can continue to pollute. I want to go tearing around in a gas guzzling muscle car as much as then next person, but instead I try to find ways to reduce my impact. These people are continuing their tradition despite the fact that the world has changed.
@Morkindie It reads like you lack empathy when you suggest that Inuits abandon their culture entirely. It's not a case of special pleading because those of us who have a decent paying job can likely adjust to a life that impacts the earth much less due to our modern conveniences. We will not have to give up a large part of our culture, in any case. That will result in a much more favorable result for the protection of bears than if we forced Native folk to give up their traditional way of life.
@erikakharada False Dichotomy. Everyone must adjust to reduce their impact on the Earth, environment, polar bears, if we care to preserve them. It just so happens that they were born into a culture that, per capita, has a larger impact on polar bears than mine.
@erikakharada I have plenty of empathy for them, but I find it curious that they are willing to change their culture in some ways and not others. Why are they using rifles and motorboats? Where are the kayaks and harpoons? They are wearing NorthFace and using snowmobiles. Wrong culture?
@Morkindie thats stupid.. why dont you move from your country? your wasting the air there and should leave... the natives there have just as much right to stay as the damn bears..
@Morkindie By that same token, tradition is not a reason to raise millions of cattle, pigs, and chickens, and in the process decimate the environment beyond what killing a few polar bears would.
@AarowSwift Seriously? They are wearing North Face gear, drive snowmobiles, motor boats and wrangle every penny out of a fur that they can. They are taking advantage of a loophole to profit from an endangered species when they could hunt any number of invasive species. Perhaps this life is easier for them than driving semi or flipping burgers, but that does not make it for "survival".
@Morkindie maybe i'm wrong about comparing polar bears to whales, people live in Greenland may not be the main reason for driving polar bears under the threat of extinction, but people living in the cities are. Maybe that's why they couldn't abandon tradition. However i don't think they should keep doing this. On the other hand, Whale is a completely different story, Japanese use "scientific research" as an excuse to kill a huge amount of whales and dolphins , and to make profit out of it
@lazzielazzie I think we agree. Both whales and polar bears are under severe pressure from human activity or natures reaction to human activity. A certain portion of that is hunting. The difference between the Japanese and Greenlanders is scale.
@Morkindie that fur is a million times better than any synthetic shit out there, sadly... u have to wear one for just 5 minutes to appreciate the difference, if u want to help invest in nano technology :)
@AgApE010 Really? What % of their dietary intake do polar bears constitute? Enough to make up for all of the time they spend tooling around in boats on the ice?
Are you suggesting that they burn more calories hunting the bears than they get from eating the bears?
And it's easy to sit behind a computer and judge those who have to hunt to eat, isn't it? Don't be a tool. Try to understand different peoples' lifestyles.
@AgApE010 I don't know how many calories they burn, but the seem to be much more interested in the fur. What about all of the gas they burn, the equipment they need to go on these expeditions, the time they could be spending on a more productive enterprise? I personally know many deer hunters. Hunting deer is easy by comparison. It is nice to have fresh venison in the fridge, but you would have to be an idiot to believe that it significantly offsets the investment. They make their profit on fur.
@AgApE010 "this just it---7'6" nose to tail." That is barely within the adult male range, so it is either a young adult male, a female, or polar bears are shrinking.
@AgApE010 a 7' brown bear rug goes for $8900, so how much do you think they sell a polar bear fur for?
How much blubber and meat do you think you could get for $8900? Do you think that the meat makes a considerable portion of the overall value of a polar bear?
I posted earlier but it didn't seem to take. Look up FRUCANADA. They sell fur of all types. They sell polar bear fur that they get from traditional Inuit hunters. The brown bear rugs sell for $8900, so if you are interested, inquire about the price of a polar bear skin. Then factor that against the cost of substituting polar bear meat with beef and you will get some idea of exactly how much emphasis they put on the skin.Youtube won't let me post links so you will have to work.
HAHA Walrus Dick
Drykla 2 weeks ago
(O.o) its not that i like stroking you , LOL 18:44
Paulp23000 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Paulp23000 2 weeks ago
this is how i like my biology!
lancevancedance 2 weeks ago
what do polar bears taste like?
MrAngelo1425 1 month ago
That guy was messing with the privet part of a walrus
funkytrain300 1 month ago
sad to see this majestic creature killed for meat. They are endangered already; can't another food source be provided for these people?
gigitrue63 1 month ago
@gigitrue63 Yes, it is indeed sad, but at least they are being killed for survival. It's far more sad to see animals being killed for money :/
sandreid87 1 month ago
@gigitrue63 These guys have hunted them for thousands if not tens of thousands of years. So unless you are willing to pay for them to resettle in a city then I'm thinking the answer is no.
RealmEternal 3 weeks ago
i want to see a Komodo dragon :P
Casin01 1 month ago
I feel like eating some polar bear meat,that shit looks good.
Ukirozu 1 month ago
seriously??
Minkay88 1 month ago
wait... did they seriously just kill a polar bear for those three petty reasons, OPENLY?
Minkay88 1 month ago
@Minkay88 they killed it for food and warmth they don't give a shit about money
TYUIO11111 1 month ago
@TYUIO11111 who said anything about money?? and just because they say something on TV, doesn't mean u believe or accept it btw
Minkay88 1 month ago
@Minkay88 umm i know but i do work for Indian Affairs in Canada as an cultural management worker so i do know
TYUIO11111 1 month ago
What a terrible waste of a magnificent animal which is part of a threatened species.
RavenHatterWriting 1 month ago
i like to fight with one
smoothyarra1 2 months ago
very educational
darknasher5000 2 months ago 6
To bad their going insctint
hmongty37 2 months ago
I would rather someone kill tradition before another polar bear has to suffer! And if tradition doesn't want to die, kill those who just wouldn't leave it alone for fucks sake!
boecxyec 4 months ago
he sounds like bear grylls
littleperrie1234 4 months ago
why cant america have tv this good? oh yeah cuz its america :(
boezehexe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Killing for tradition, pollution and global warming... I'm starting to doubt if there's still a future left for polar bears. ☹
10rosegarden14 4 months ago
Comment removed
10rosegarden14 4 months ago
Polar bears have no natural predator, thus killing them is abnormal and have a negative effect in the food chain. Just like killing sharks, bears, lions and tigers.
10rosegarden14 4 months ago 12
@10rosegarden14 What are you talking about? Humans are the polar bears natural predator. Natives have been hunting them for a very long time. Due to the small numbers of native hunters the polar bear had maintained a healthy and stable population. Disruptions in their habitat is the biggest threat to the polar bear.
SugarBare28 1 month ago
"Do you really think we need so much chocolate?"
"YES!!!"
So funny...
skiljathegirl 4 months ago
@Morkindie species they rely so heavily on (bears.) They know they must let the life cycle happen. I understand your side especially since Bears are at risk but the Inuits (I think) need to survive also & the P.Bear is their Cow (or lettuce if you're a Veg) I respect your opinion entirely I just think you should check their perspective a bit more because Bears & other Indigenous Species (which are few & far between) are their living. Like I said thats their SuperMart & we need to respect that.
surfer1211 5 months ago
@surfer1211 I respect that they had a sustainable lifestyle long ago. If it weren't for all of the other pressures on polar bears, they might continue their tradition for hundreds of years more. That is not the way the world is. I don't see why I should respect them when they continue to practice a lifestyle that is contributing to the extinction of a species. We all need to cut back and curb our behavior, and these people, as individuals, are doing a great deal of harm. killing the young. : (
Morkindie 4 months ago
@Morkindie I hear you. I noticed that big deal they made in not allowing the scientists messing with the skinning. These people justify this massacres with their "tradition" bullshit, yet they use firearms, motorized vehicles, electricity, fabrics, etc. Jeopardizing the very existence of a species like this is just wrong and immoral.
heroesytumbas 2 months ago
@Morkindie Their Super Mart is the Ice Sheets. The isles there offer Seals, Walrus, and of course Polar Bears. I understand your side and how because bears are depleting that hunting them should be banned altogether. But I really believe the quotas are enforced and regulated. If they go over it can't be by much but honestly I feel as if the hunters respect and honor the quota. I think they are conscious enough to respect the 30 bear quota because if they go over it they can propagate the...
surfer1211 5 months ago
@Morkindie It is when that's your livelihood. Their hunting is our farming and cattle/chicken slaughter. Expect their really can't farm, so they "farm/slaughter" Polar Bears. That's their food and clothing. Obviously they have more modern clothing as well but "Traditionally," that was their main source. Although Polar Bears are an at risk species, they still need to be hunted for their own survival. It's not like these people can go to the local Super Mart and have steaks to just pick up...
surfer1211 5 months ago
it would be good if we never existed at all.
111E982a 5 months ago
this is amazing im an average person but i enjoy watching these documentaries if only to further expand my knowledge and appreciate the facinating organisms that inhabit our planet
WorldWatcher9 5 months ago
those hunters are right ..you can't eat money hunger takes precidence scientist would'nt understand
WorldWatcher9 5 months ago
No animals were harmed during making of this film!
iTziLLUMY 6 months ago
that fur looks sooooo fluffy that i just wana stroke it and sleep in it XD
lolcookie555 6 months ago
How old is this documentary? It's impressive.
BladesOfMunch 6 months ago
@BladesOfMunch This episode came out earlier this year. Indeed, it is a very impressive documentary.
SpelKille 6 months ago
did they need to kill a bear out for a walk with her cub? bambiesque
TheZombehdude 6 months ago
did they do one on the ostrich or the hippo or rhino?
ceitiosaurus 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fucking hunter should get shot.
airesgundam23 7 months ago
And I loved UK....
:(
andapabu14 7 months ago
OMFG
andapabu14 7 months ago
Thus, even by my relatively austere life style -- no car, no daily shower, equipped only with computer, telephone, tv, stereo, small fridge, low-watt light-bulbs, camping stove, ... -- I am one of a BILLION OR SO contributors to the destruction of the environment. I believe that part of the solution is to reduce the population of Earth from its present 7 billion to just around 1 or 2. Starting right now, even if it means fewer clients, fewer voters, fewer church members, ...
wkboonec 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if u ever touched one animals with a bad reason, i fucking kill u, i rape ur mother, i choke ur grandma and i kick ur grandpa in the fucking balls, i rape ur children and i shot ur fucking friends in the head u fucking motherfuckers cocksuckerss!!!!!!!!!!
arra009 7 months ago
Comment removed
arra009 7 months ago
Comment removed
2moreme 7 months ago
awesome episode
akkadianarab 7 months ago
I don't know much about polar bears, but you didn't teach me anything new.. i just can't understand how you people go to sleep at night..
staindman00 7 months ago
I just feel sad that something so magnificent, top of the food chain beast can scope down to a level so low as this.. =(
0803526C 7 months ago
very nice! glade to have you back and posting.
vangt5 7 months ago
It says that it's thought that polar bears evolved from a population that was trapped in siberia. Right after that, they say they started eating seals. Since when are seals found right in the middle of siberia?
PBDPBD 8 months ago
@PBDPBD Since the last major glaciation, when there were inland waterways that contained seals. Today, their descendants live in Lake Baikal, far from any ocean.
SevenSixTwoNato 7 months ago
@PBDPBD The area on the map, in Siberia, wasn't "ground->ice", there was big areas of liquid water between the open ground and the massive ice of the ice-age, where many seals were trapped too.
Or so the theory goes, as I understand it. Many forms of seals live around the edges of ice-areas, so they would just tag along as the ice goes around.
Superslemmet 7 months ago 4
nonetheless...... I felt so sad and sorry for the poor unfortunate polar bear
jeebersjumpincryst 8 months ago
This was was a bit disappointing. Very little actual dissection, and pretty heavy on scenery and dialog.
LimeyLassen 8 months ago
Those hunters could easily survive eating something else. They shouldn't have been granted permission to kill polar bears just because it's their tradition; we can't afford losing these animals which are already on the edge of extinction...
VegsoulWhiteWolf 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow... a whole hour!!!
Thank you!
Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou.
jeebersjumpincryst 8 months ago 2
Most of the films I've seen on Polar bears are in reference to the bears in Churchill Manitoba.
JamesThWilliams 8 months ago
GOO richard
robobrain10000 8 months ago
Tradition is not a reason to kill polar bears.
Morkindie 8 months ago 27
@Morkindie
They kill to eat... I think it's a good reason.
vava54own 8 months ago
@vava54own I totally agree...
jeebersjumpincryst 8 months ago
@vava54own Maybe if they were trapped and starving, yet they have boats and rifles and remain in the frozen North killing an endangered species. Tradition is not a reason. They are not killing JUST to eat.
Morkindie 8 months ago
@Morkindie They're just killing for fun? Alrighty then.
flatbuns16 8 months ago
@flatbuns16 I am not saying what they are killing for, only that it is not ONLY to eat.
Morkindie 8 months ago
@Morkindie They are killing for their fur coats as well. By eating these animals, they can better adapt to the cold, by absorbing at least small quantities of the blubber of these animals, as well as using their fur coats, and of course they do need to eat. In such a cold climate, you would need a high fat diet, and likewise, they do not deplete the polar bear populations by hunting them.
brentlion 6 months ago
@brentlion Yes, yes, I understand the logistics very well. If one were to live in the arctic in the primitive hunter gatherer lifestyle, hunting polar bears would be a no-brainer. However, these people are not living in those conditions. They are simply using a loophole to sell the polar bear's fur. They are not WEARING polar bear fur. They have the opportunity to leave, but they continue to hunt an endangered species. The situation is not sustainable. We should not allow this special pleading.
Morkindie 6 months ago
@Morkindie They actually do wear the polar bear`s fur. You can even see one of them wearing one in this very vid. There are some cases, where, if you kill off a certain part of a population, they raise in numbers. Kinda like killing old male lions......not to say that i agree with the killing of these animals.......
brentlion 6 months ago
@brentlion I guess I missed the polar bear suit. I also failed to see their kayaks and spears. If one kills all of the non-producing males, it stands to reason that there will be more resources for the females to survive. That is not what they are doing. They are killing females and the young.
Morkindie 6 months ago
@Morkindie Neither, you, nor i, fully understand all of the reasons why killing a certain group of these may cause an increase an the overall population size....so, i don`t pretend to.
brentlion 6 months ago
@brentlion speak for yourself.
Morkindie 6 months ago
@Morkindie It applies to anyone who hasn`t spent many years involved with these animals.
brentlion 6 months ago
@Morkindie if you are referring to the footage at 6.25min in, that is clearly a dog sent out, not a cub, look closer you can see the long bushy tail curled upward, golden fur and the ambling movement as it excitedly is attempting to subdue/wear out the bear. Be serious really. When hunting not all dogs would be part of the team.
vgrasomni 1 month ago
@vgrasomni No, I was referring to the bears that they were carving up. It is not a tiny cub that one would pick up and feed with a bottle, but it is not fully grown. There are certain rules to sustainable hunting. But when a creature is endangered from human's non-hunting behavior, hunting becomes unsustainable no matter how it is practiced.
Morkindie 1 month ago
@Morkindie True, I couldn't agree more that hunting a top predator who has naturally lower numbers due to -among other aspects, the range of the prey and amount of prey required, makes it unsustainable, especially if their genetic diversity is low. It is tricky when people say they need such a species to survive in a land. As controversial as it is, humans do not have the right to send other species extinct. As well as the effect it can have in an ecosystems services it make logical sense.
vgrasomni 1 month ago
@vgrasomni true but they are very limited to their hunting and the Inuit take everything and also have been doing it for generations they dont just kill for sport this is a job for many to feed their families
TYUIO11111 1 month ago
@Morkindie (continued) to preserve the genetic diversity and thus evolutionary potential in order to sustain life on earth.
vgrasomni 1 month ago
@Morkindie how about hunger? is that reason enough for you?!?
Tolstoievsky 7 months ago
@Morkindie yeah, they should grow crops..
Umbalafum 7 months ago
@Umbalafum or motorboat south. If they are such enthusiastic hunters, there are invasive species all over the world causing problem.
Morkindie 7 months ago
@Morkindie maybe not.. but survival is...
AtheistCause 7 months ago
@AtheistCause They are not hunting for survival. If they wanted to survive they would leave that frozen waste land they live in. They have boats. The scientists offered them money. They stay because they are stuck in their culture, and they see their traditions as more important than the survival of polar bears.
Morkindie 7 months ago
@Morkindie There are quotas for hunting polar bears, seals, whales etc.; as was made evident in the programme, what is most dangerous to polar bears are pollution and global warming. I think it's unfortunate that you think they should give up what they have been practicing, sustainably, for hundreds of years because we in the "modern" world are causing the decline of their prey. It's very easy to say "well, why don't they just stop?" if it's not your culture being criticised.
erikakharada 7 months ago
@erikakharada What quota could be reasonable when the animal is endangered? Also It is not like I am suggesting that they stop hunting so that the rest of us can continue to pollute. I want to go tearing around in a gas guzzling muscle car as much as then next person, but instead I try to find ways to reduce my impact. These people are continuing their tradition despite the fact that the world has changed.
This is a clear case of special pleading.
Morkindie 7 months ago
@Morkindie It reads like you lack empathy when you suggest that Inuits abandon their culture entirely. It's not a case of special pleading because those of us who have a decent paying job can likely adjust to a life that impacts the earth much less due to our modern conveniences. We will not have to give up a large part of our culture, in any case. That will result in a much more favorable result for the protection of bears than if we forced Native folk to give up their traditional way of life.
erikakharada 7 months ago
@erikakharada False Dichotomy. Everyone must adjust to reduce their impact on the Earth, environment, polar bears, if we care to preserve them. It just so happens that they were born into a culture that, per capita, has a larger impact on polar bears than mine.
Morkindie 7 months ago
@erikakharada I have plenty of empathy for them, but I find it curious that they are willing to change their culture in some ways and not others. Why are they using rifles and motorboats? Where are the kayaks and harpoons? They are wearing NorthFace and using snowmobiles. Wrong culture?
Morkindie 7 months ago
@Morkindie thats stupid.. why dont you move from your country? your wasting the air there and should leave... the natives there have just as much right to stay as the damn bears..
AtheistCause 4 months ago
@AtheistCause You are not making any sense. Would you like to rephrase your statement?
Morkindie 4 months ago
@Morkindie By that same token, tradition is not a reason to raise millions of cattle, pigs, and chickens, and in the process decimate the environment beyond what killing a few polar bears would.
erikakharada 7 months ago
@erikakharada Agreed. That is why I only eat organic grass fed local food.
Morkindie 7 months ago
@Morkindie
In their case, it's not tradition, it's survival.
AarowSwift 6 months ago
@AarowSwift Seriously? They are wearing North Face gear, drive snowmobiles, motor boats and wrangle every penny out of a fur that they can. They are taking advantage of a loophole to profit from an endangered species when they could hunt any number of invasive species. Perhaps this life is easier for them than driving semi or flipping burgers, but that does not make it for "survival".
Morkindie 6 months ago
@Morkindie
Same logic applied to whales. Tradition is an excuse.
lazzielazzie 5 months ago
@lazzielazzie Not a valid excuse. Not a logical justification. They might as well say, "We hunt polar bears because we want to."
Morkindie 5 months ago
@Morkindie maybe i'm wrong about comparing polar bears to whales, people live in Greenland may not be the main reason for driving polar bears under the threat of extinction, but people living in the cities are. Maybe that's why they couldn't abandon tradition. However i don't think they should keep doing this. On the other hand, Whale is a completely different story, Japanese use "scientific research" as an excuse to kill a huge amount of whales and dolphins , and to make profit out of it
lazzielazzie 5 months ago
@lazzielazzie I think we agree. Both whales and polar bears are under severe pressure from human activity or natures reaction to human activity. A certain portion of that is hunting. The difference between the Japanese and Greenlanders is scale.
Morkindie 5 months ago
@Morkindie that fur is a million times better than any synthetic shit out there, sadly... u have to wear one for just 5 minutes to appreciate the difference, if u want to help invest in nano technology :)
rusalkin 5 months ago
@Morkindie
It's no merely tradition. They stated that the hunters use the bear meat, skin, and fur. They survive on it.
AgApE010 4 months ago
@AgApE010 Really? What % of their dietary intake do polar bears constitute? Enough to make up for all of the time they spend tooling around in boats on the ice?
Morkindie 4 months ago
@Morkindie
Are you suggesting that they burn more calories hunting the bears than they get from eating the bears?
And it's easy to sit behind a computer and judge those who have to hunt to eat, isn't it? Don't be a tool. Try to understand different peoples' lifestyles.
AgApE010 4 months ago
@AgApE010 I don't know how many calories they burn, but the seem to be much more interested in the fur. What about all of the gas they burn, the equipment they need to go on these expeditions, the time they could be spending on a more productive enterprise? I personally know many deer hunters. Hunting deer is easy by comparison. It is nice to have fresh venison in the fridge, but you would have to be an idiot to believe that it significantly offsets the investment. They make their profit on fur.
Morkindie 4 months ago
@Morkindie
Got any evidence to back up those accusations that these hunters are merely fur-peddlers?
AgApE010 4 months ago
@AgApE010 They make it clear in the video that the hunters are very concerned about the condition of the fur.
Also, try a google search
furcanada--- bear-skin-rugs-polar-bear
Morkindie 4 months ago
@AgApE010 "this just it---7'6" nose to tail." That is barely within the adult male range, so it is either a young adult male, a female, or polar bears are shrinking.
Morkindie 4 months ago
@AgApE010 a 7' brown bear rug goes for $8900, so how much do you think they sell a polar bear fur for?
How much blubber and meat do you think you could get for $8900? Do you think that the meat makes a considerable portion of the overall value of a polar bear?
Morkindie 4 months ago
@Morkindie
I'm not seeing evidence dude. Do you know what constitutes as evidence?
AgApE010 4 months ago
@AgApE010
I posted earlier but it didn't seem to take. Look up FRUCANADA. They sell fur of all types. They sell polar bear fur that they get from traditional Inuit hunters. The brown bear rugs sell for $8900, so if you are interested, inquire about the price of a polar bear skin. Then factor that against the cost of substituting polar bear meat with beef and you will get some idea of exactly how much emphasis they put on the skin.Youtube won't let me post links so you will have to work.
Morkindie 4 months ago
40:15 guys licking their lips. I bet they sure would like some polar meat nao.
Xgya2000 8 months ago
YES another one. Thank you, thank you, thank you!
reafdaw01 8 months ago
finally, a new episode O_O
szasz85b 8 months ago
swweeetttt :)
FUCKOFFYOURGAY 8 months ago
Welcome back
MultiDwo 8 months ago
Awesome
deagon85 8 months ago