Added: 5 years ago
From: spokoinoi2000
Views: 61,455
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He is okay. I usually don't prefer his recordings, but this one is tolerable for me. As far as interpretation... I liked the dynamic contrast at the end, but felt it did not need to instantly be PPP after the recapitulation of the main theme. Seemed like it was loud for 1 minute, and quiet for 1 minute. Phrasing wasn't noticeable, especially at the part following the ostinato bass figures around 1 minute. He rushes through the climax and immediately back to the main theme. Bad and flat audio...

  • I love your interpretation of this piece.

  • This is the beat interpretation I have heard since my own... when I played this for my grad recital at Manhattan School of Music, 1986... you really felt the music... I hate when peeps just sound like technicians... no music... thanks. xoleah

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • I like this version much more than his other op. 8 no 2. that circulates on YT. This one is way more musical, the other is too mechanical, too perfect. BTW, don't y'all hate that most pianists only play op. 8 no. 12? This piece is on par if not better IMHO.

  • I love what he does with the bass throughout the piece, and what a color change at 1:12. Extraordinary Scriabin interpreter, he should definitely play more of him.

  • @demosj , Yes, I couldn't agree more about both your comments.

  • I love the way Pogorelich rounds off his phrases SO musically and something not many pianists today even bother doing. This man remains for me one of a handful of the most brilliant, most creative, most technically accomplished pianists I ever heard.

  • Yes, phrasing seems his best trait, and not many come near him in that.

  • @billyguns2  indeed, and how true

    It is rare and inspiring to see someone who breathes new life and creative discovery into the repertoire.

  • @billyguns2 I completely agree. He has a certain legato to his playing that seems reminiscent of the classical period. A lot of players nowadays seem to have a much more staccato, playful type of playing that seems to come from the romantic period. There's nothing wrong with that and I enjoy that in many cases (like Bartok) but in the case of a composer like Scriabin, I prefer a smooth, old fashioned, almost reverent way of interpreting it and Pogorelich does that beautifully.

  • @billyguns2 You must be forgetting about Luganskj and Ashkenazy.

  • Resta uno dei più grandi interpreti di tutti i tempi... Grazie!

  • live is worth living for listen to your music, pogo! thank you!

  • ...che uomo! ♥

    è meglio tacere e prendere esempio

  • Superb! He is one of the most enthralling and musically expansive pianists of our time.

    Phillip Wilcher

  • For sure!

  • Bravo, Ivo! You are a living legend.

  • Yes, and when I was young, too. Restrained, I think, for Ivo. Listen also to his Brahms 118/2 Intermezzo

  • Pogorelich also resembles J. Hoffman when he was young.

  • look up him playing chopins 24th prelude in d minor and tell me then you tihnk hes boring...

  • obviously you don't know true musical talent.

  • No one in the world like him. Hope he bounces back soon from his meltdown '06 tour.

  • wait whoa what happened? i didn't hear about this...

  • His profile looks kinda like Anton Rubinstein...Look closely guys!!

  • great...

  • Pogo a gogo. No other pianist alive can turn on a dime and create a lifelong memorable experience like he can. He's the Man.

  • YAY! Another clip from this concert! Thank you spokoinoi2000!!!

  • Does anyone have the rest of this concert?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more