BBC WTC 7 Reported collapse, Before It Collapsed

[theBartone9119]

Is it more logical to assume that reporters , firefighters, and the whole world was just casually blowing the cover on the huge 911 scheme for no reason on camera......or maybe? Everything is as it seems, and there is IS no mystery?

Occam's Razor - The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct

[theBartone9119]

And pull is a term in the demolition world for pulling the remains of a building down with CABLES. Call up a demo expert , it does NOT mean explosives. Demo teams were at WTC 6 because it was so damaged that they just pulled it. They even clearly say "We are going to pull building 6"

watch?v=cUZtTQHiLSw

....OMG CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! Morons...And Larry didn't even mean pull the building ANYWAY. He meant they pulled the squad out to not risk loss of life , because they knew it was coming down.

[theBartone9119]

And plus all the witness accounts of explosions were single explosions at different times......That's not a controlled demolition. A CD is hundreds/thousands of explosions at the same time then the building falls right after. People hearing isolated explosions at different times, means it was NOT a controlled demolition. And the only firefigther who said "it was LIKE a controlled demolition boom boom" ironically, was using his hands to show a progressive collapse.

[theBartone9119]

And people hearing "loud explosions" is NOT uncommon in building fires.

Explosions as Firefighters Tackle Fire at Falmouth Docks:

"Then there was some massive, massive explosions and we saw a big raging fire on top of these canisters," he told the BBC

Winter Haven Fire Claims 3 Homes:

"We ran out of water, we waited for more water. Then started attacking the explosions... We have multiple explosions..."

Firefighters battle three-alarm fire involving explosions

[theBartone9119]

Umm every reporter got the memo an hour early that Building 7 was going to collapse, because when the firefighters went in the building hey heard loud groaning, things were dripping/falling, and the roof was sagging, so they didn't even fight the fire, they warned everyone right away that Building 7 was coming down next. Firefighters said they've never seen anything like it

/watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4

This woman says "I just got word, Building 7 is next"

watch?v=O-WZpXiEKAo

Mystery? GTFO lol

[OrogDeMalfur]

i hope someday that we wont have the entire world believe in the first thing they are told

i hope someday that people would quit trying to tell conspiracy theorists to sit down and shut up

i cant wait for little green men to land on earth, im gonna walk around with a megaphone chanting "i told you!"

[AGENTtamerlane]

they brought down building three to destroy evidence. It had evidence of who stole the 2.3 TRILLION from the Pentagon. They announced the missing money 9/10.

[oldskoolmacboy]

You should all wear silver foil helmets to block out the governments mind control rays. She's in front of a green screen, he's an animatronic, they are reading from a script. Wise up people! Deal with credible facts and not bullshit speculation. But hey maybe I am part of the conspiracy, maybe the government is controlling me AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

[MapleLeafConfederacy]

that window on the left looks so fucking fake. sorry!

[eleventhsun]

They read what they are given. They were told to report that, they just did it too early. Fucking scamming bastards..

[cheesenbiscuits]

They are talking about the build being severely damages after the collapse of the first tower. Certainly portions of the building would have collapsed. This is still prior to the final collapse.

[oldskoolmacboy]

@eleventhsun Bullshit, the reporters write the reports at the BBC

[eleventhsun]

@oldskoolmacboy

Oh so they are psychic and wrote it before it happened then ?

[TheGoodnessIsGood]

Look at the main guy talking, he's such a dishonest pretender just watch him, it's so freakin obvious. He can't hardly contain himself.

[Maddoxhardcore]

There is no possible way this is a green screen. During an interview with her and the head of BBC news at no point was a green sceen mentioned. The official line is that she was panicked. You can also read about it on Mike Rudin's blog on the BBC website. At least if you are going to 'debunk' find something with a shred of credibility, the difference between truth seekers like me and 'patriots' like you is that we search for fact and alternate explanations. Not speculation.

[TheGoodnessIsGood]

You rock. Thanks for spreading the truth.

[itchyandscratchy]

LOL!!!!

[smartbet]

WOW clever retort itchy......I can now clearly see your side of the debate after such a well informed response.

[kinerzwwfc123]

im guessing someone saw the twin towers collapsed and thought it was the solommon building =P unlikely, but what is more likely is that what is behind her isnt the new york skyline, its a green screen, a recording super imposed onto the screen, i work with itv news and they do the same, ever found it funny how every single news channel seems to be in the exact same position?

[rogueweapon]

look at where the sun light is hitting her, is a live shot!

[smartbet]

It's a spotlight you dork!

[rogueweapon]

I don't think so. Why did they bring building 7 down again? to bury evidence maybe. There is no other reason to destroy an entire building.

[TheGoodnessIsGood]

Her squinting eyes also indicate that it's more like sunlight than artificial light which would not cause her to have to do that in a set up environment. She is pointing to the live shot explaining it, sunlight on her face etc. BBC = Bullshit Broadcasting Conartists.

[AliOsmanYomra]

@TheGoodnessIsGood

BBC=Bullshit Broadcasting Conartists

Well said

THanks

[ncdave4life]

The BBC did not air that report before 7 WTC collapsed. They aired it afterward.

That's why there was no uproar about it 5-1/2 years ago. The BBC is widely rebroadcast in the USA. If they'd actually announced the collapse of 7 WTC before it happened, many people would have noticed at the time.

-Dave

[Googlespyware]

George the II (baby bush cousin of J F Kerry who both admit to being a member of Skull and bones 322 order of death,it's on record!) who committed High Treason on 911

[ncdave4life]

If you watch the clip, you'll see to the immediate left of the "window" behind the reporter is the edge of what appears to be another window. If that were a real window behind her, the image to the left of it would have to be another real window, showing the SAME skyline. But the window at the left shows an entirely different skyline, with different buidings, different lighting, and smoke drifting in a different direction. Ergo, you aren't looking at real windows, it's video.

-Dave

[jjackson0215]

If the pane to the left is a video. Then that is the worst Green screen job on the planet. Why go through all the trouble to make two video clips? When one is an unimportant strip down the side?

[jjackson0215]

No, I suspect she is standing at the part of the building that turns or cuts at an angle. Probably the angle cuts towards the camera. Here is why I think it's towards the camera. A it's not showing you what is behind her, it's a reflective piece of the building at which angle you are seeing to the left and back of her. So what we see is a reflection down the street to the left of her hence the smoke going in different direction.

[jjackson0215]

Also she has a backglow on her face in several frames note 2:30. So if the sun is from the right the back glow means there must be something on the left to reflect it back to her. Since it's not as strong a back glow a window pane would be a good source and for the window pane to reflect on to her it would have to be facing toward the camera.

[ncdave4life]

Despite over 5 years of searching, the conspiracy nuts haven't found a single structural engineer on the entire planet who believes that crackpot nonsense about any or all of the WTC skyscrapers being destroyed by explosives. That's because anyone with relevant expertise can recognize that controlled demolition nonsense as... nonsense.

-Dave

[ncdave4life]

The conspiracy nuts apparently think the reporter is standing in front of a real window. She's not, of course, any more than David Letterman does his show before a real window overlooking NYC. She's standing in front of a ChromaKey screen, showing previously recorded footage. It's the same technology that shows news clips behind news anchors, and giant weather maps behind weather reporters.

-Dave

[jjackson0215]

Not likely Green screened. I thought so at first glance but it's more likely the camera inability to correctly whitebalance the difference between the far and close. Note the suns angle and shadows cast. They are the same both on her and the buildings.

[jjackson0215]

Weatherpeople stand in front of a greenscreen with light from above or the sides. Not light only from one side. in addition that light would not cast the same warm glow like the morning sun casts. Now i've never heard of a mobile green screen for news, but that doesn't mean there isn't one. same warm glow like the morning sun casts. Now i've never heard of a mobile green screen for news, but that doesn't mean there isn't one.

[jjackson0215]

Another thing about chromakey is why step in zoom out of the frame then step out of the frame if it's a chroma? Just cut to the other feed and splice her voice in. half the trouble and time.

[WNanette]

emmo2k:

What itchyandscratchy and TexasLibertarian are on about, is CLEARly seen at 01:09, at her hairline - see that wide light grey-appearing building, with the dark, low, wide window? That is WTC7, bloke.

The red building is the Verizon building, in front of it, to the left a bit.

You have nothing to be so defensive about.

[emmo2k]

WTF are you on about theres nothing there! its clearly not standing

[TexasLibertarian]

I bet she feels stupid now....reporting the collapse of WTC7 with the building clearly still standing right behind her.