If you moved from the TV/comp you would mediately know that this large blue box is a tent
2:44 man with glasses has his right hand on TENT skeleton tubes - and this tent is slightly higher closer tu as and lower further to us - so it is posible to look inside and see that it is empty and without FLOR - is your missile part is hovering , or maybe genie holds it?
Fine,ok if you ppl say so a plane hitting the Pentagon, but what are those ppl doing walking in that CRIME seen in that formation? ....ohh they was heading out for lunch to a local subway restaurant that's it, look you blind sum brain washD ppl can talk about edit all you want BUT those normal dressed citizens R not edited nor R those ppl Carrying that box
At a Pentagon briefing the day after 9/11 Ed Plaugher (fire chief) who put out the fire at the Pentagon said there was only small pieces of the plane left but no large sections like fuselage engine and even seats. The Pentagon said that there were no identifiable pieces of plane left except for black box. There was no evidence but it waaass a plane and they say a fire melted and vaporized all identifiable pieces.
However they managed to fingerprint the bodies? Strange.
Maybe if you used color in this piece of shit video, you might see that the scraps had the same paint scheme as flight 77. Thruthers...always hiding the real facts!
@kanukster The real facts: No video/photo of a 757 No evidence of the majority of wreckage (cockpit, wings, tail, (2) engines, fuselage, luggage, 239 chairs) No verification of the wreckage No video evidence of a fire at the impact hole/lawn No evidence of even one body identified as a passenger No engine/wing/tail impact damage No seismic data for the impact FDR data shows the plane missing all light poles MAJOR witness inconsistencies
Scraps for an 80 ton plane? This might help your imagination. Cameraman Bob Pugh was on scene approx 10 mins after impact and he states there are only "dinner-plate sized" and "2X3 ft pieces" on the lawn. No recoginzable plane parts; wings, tail, cockpit, luggage, chairs, bodies, etc...
@muzicmaker2001 Ha! Ha! Once again you didn't respond to my comment concerning you removing the color from your 'conveniently' edited video!
"Imagination"...? I'm not the one with the distorted imagination. I've seen the videos showing the correlation of the pieces to the EXACT plane. I've seen the photos showing the engine, landing gear, wheel assembly.
In fact, in order for you to make this, you must have seen the other photos showing the mentioned items, you just chose not to show them!
@kanukster The straw-man argument you present here is exactly that. A deflection from the content of the video which shows people with no gloves picking up pieces of evidence. A line of people picking up evidence at the pentagon before investigators could get there. Care to explain why NTSB would deviate from standard procedure in a plane crash?
@kanukster The scraps could very well be the same color of american airlines but even if so then would you mind explaining how it is legal or plauseable to tamper with evidence before a crime scene is investigated. No crime scene that I know of in this country is investigated that way. 100's of emegency workers with proper gear on yet these couple individuals see it fit to run out in normal office clothes and disrupt evidence? I could understand if they where inside looking for bodies......
The reality: There is no photographic evidence of even one body identified as a passenger, no luggage or even one of the 239 chairs on-board. Look it up....
Why is it I find more people believing that a 757 hit the pentagon and turn to dust then I do smart people. This is why nothing has been done about it
@PeaceIsRad "The "Official" report was askewed according to the actual RAW data of the boxes. It shows the flight deck door never even opened..." Of course the FDR never showed the door flight deck door opened because thats what it is suppose to show. 757-2 FDR's DO NOT report an open/close door status, CLOSED is the default status, no matter how many times it is opened. In 1997 that status was added to the FDR data frame in 757-3 FDR's and above.
Global Hawk didn't exist until 2006, and it doesn't have the mass to penetrate 3 buildings like Flight 77 did.
The "box" is a emergency Tent.
The people wearing "No gloves" holding debris could be in shock, and exerting obsessive behavior.
The "clean up crew" could be helping to collect as much of the airplane as possible, even small piece the size of your thumb can give a clue as to what occured.
They even found one of the victims wedding bands at the WTC site.
On March 21, 2001, aircraft number 982003, the third ACTD aircraft produced, set an official world endurance record for UAVs, at 30 hours, 24 minutes and 1 second, flying from Edwards Airbase. Check your facts buddy.
Fine, it wasn't in service, it was a prototype still being worked on by its contractor, no Government agency nor branch of the military would be able to suddenly fly it off somewhere unoticed and fly it into a building.
And it still at 11 tons wasn't enough to cause the damage.
find the wreckage? note how the most intense fire in the clip? the generator? hmm, what about the jet fuel? and this is directly after impact....think moron
see any bodies idiot? to be exact, 184 bodies??? sure, they're all in that tiny ass hole? lol any wreckage? how about wreckage from the cockpit, wings, tail, fuselage, engines, chairs, luggage? i think the government was counting on idiots like you believing this crap. mission accomplished...lol
757's are made to be light and hollow, fill them with fuel and then slam them into a Indiana limestone wall at 450+mph with 121,000 lbs of thrust, its a pretty good chance FUCKALL that looks like a plane will be left, YOU STUPID FUCKING TRUTHER RETARD, have you EVER attended ONE crash site in you life?, well? let me guess NO!, and you have no flight or engineering experience: what a surprise! NOW FUCK OFF, your TOOOO stupid for me to bother with!
seen it before. why is all the wreckage isolated? where's all the wreckage and hundreds of tiny bits of debris around the impact hole. ya know..where the plane actually crashed moron? planted..yes, wouldn't you say the wreckage shown in the clip is probably less than 1 ton of the total 80 ton plane... did the chairs and luggage just vanish also?...get a clue moron
And I have a close up as well if you really enjoy seeing a human being chared, but then I'm sure you've never been in the fire service either, am I right?, I have 15 years. Most of my life around aviation, I live In south Australia, anytime you or your truther buddies want to come see my CV your welcome, you calling me an idiot?, thats rich.
moron, that's an exhibit from the Moussaoui Trial showing a few victims that were inside at impact. 184 people with 64 being from Flight 77 supposedly died inside this small impact area. where are they idiot? i really don't care who you are..and yes, i'm calling you an idiot.
Yeah, right. When was the last witnesses were asked to help clean up the debris from a plane crash site? Let alone, a supposed terrorist attack? You are a complete moron.
I want to thank everyone that participated in this "False Flag Attack".
I am so proud that a few people in the military died so that I could have cheap gas for my car and also so that my defense, oil and contruction related stocks went up in value. A few dead military personnel are well worth most of us making money and saving on gas. The base building in Iraq has made many of us very rich. Those stocks have soared. Bless those that died for our net worth
i really hope noones acually listening to this guy..lol he doesnt know anything. and in 2:12 its a tent..lmao funny how little evidence they need to foll all these idiots.
Funny how you supposedly know this when no one has suggested it's a tent. Only an idiot would believe that line of guys cleaning up are 'rescue' workers. Hiding any trace of illicit govt activity more like.
We shouldn't let somebody to keep filling our brains with the stuff they want and snatch our own ideas and opinions.Today in this world it is very easy to make fool of hundreds and thousands of people through the controlled media.
I m surprised after reading the comments that,still,there are people on this planet who think that 911 attacks wasn't inside job.This is what i use to think and voted for Bush.But when i started thinking about this event and the international media instead of just watching american media,i regretted voting Bush.I think we should start looking deep into the international current affairs through all kinds of media to get a larger picture and to make a better decision.
"we had to destroy the village in order to save it." vietnam vet circa 1968
"Some might ask, how in the world could the Secretary of Defense attack the Pentagon in front of its people? To them I reply, I have no desire to attack the Pentagon; I want to liberate it. We need to save it from itself."
why would we hit 3 buildings and almost 4 of our own buildings killing thousands? if the government did this then why wouldn't they just destroy one building instead of 3 and almost 4? if they did it that way it wouldn't be bringing up so much questions on what really happened on 9/11, just think of that! it wasn't an inside job!
the guy that made this is an idiot and needs to be shot my uncle was in the pentigon when that happened thank god he wasnt in that area if i had lost a loved one that day i would be sueing the shit out of this ass hole
The guy who made this video has to be mentally ill, he cant understand why people are picking up aluminum from the plane crash? In part two he claims the high pressure compressor impeller with the fins sheared off is a engine out of a 'global hawk"! He didnt even check out his own claim! He claims that the aluminum parts being picked up arent from a plane. 757s are made of thin aluminum sheets, as thin as .041 inches! He thinks the plane is built of aluminum 1/2" thick! He is an idiot!
The guy is worried because government employees were gathering evidence (not "cleaning up" like the idiot narrator claims) Of coarse they weren't wearing "gloves and boots", they were at work at the Pentagon when flight 77 hit. The people lined up were the same! Whats wrong with government employees picking up plane parts for a government investigation? The item being carried may have been part of the fuselage they found with bodies strapped in their seats still, of coarse it was covered.
It is proved, that the passenger Boeing did not run into the Pentagon. If the passenger Boeing did not run into the Pentagon, where 150 person which flied by this plane? Officially people have died in act of terrorism. And actually them have shot FBI?
Everyone Has Different Opinions,I See Your Way Of Thinking Whizkid..But If It Is A Inside Job,Everyone Is From The Gorvement. Is MONEY a problem for them? i dont think so..
sorry if anyone disagrees with this but im saying it.....i personally dont believe it was a inside job from the government for many reasons, but the main 1 is that there would be too many people involved and somebody, somewhere down the line would of talked or leaked information by now.
Let's just forget about the fact that the offical story that attempts to explain the lack of any plane aluminium & titanium debris states that the fire was SOOO! intense that it "VAPORISED" most of the metal and all the luggage, yet that same "metal- & luggage-vaporising" fire allegedly left human DNA entact, let's all turn our eyes at what a REAL plane crash looks like...
50 tons of wreckage was removed from the Pentagon, everyone saw the plane, the bodies were found, one of the engines ws found outside, You idiots dont think about the fact that there were real people on that plane, if it didnt hit, tell me, where is the plane and the passengers? The families buried their loved ones that were found at the Pentagon. The passengers were talking to loved ones by phone right up to the point the plane hit the Pentagon. Only sick freaks think it didnt hit
hahahah 50 tons of wreckage what a load all they found were peices of the building stop making shit up when i see a pic of then taking a plane out of the pentagon il beleave that load of bull shit send me some pics of them removing a plane and that engin they found wasnt even a bowing 747 engin notice how its not 9tf tall and why is there only one hmmmm it melted? steel and titanium cant melt at those temps
If you look at the engine you will notice that the radial impeller blades had been sheared off during the crash, you don't know much about jet engines do you? I didn't think so. The engine is easily identified as coming from flight 77, look at photos of the high pressure impeller and pics of the impellers found at the Pentagon and it is EASY to see they are the same parts. The impellers on the Rolls Royce engine used on 77 are not 9 feet in diameter anyway! You are a fool!
Not only are the impeller blades easily identified as coming from 77's engines so is the combustion outer cases found at the Pentagon. Every part of the engines found matches up PERFECTLY with the Rolls Royce engines used on flight 77. There are also photos of many MANY other EASILY identified parts from flight 77 including the landing gear! I think you should stop looking at YouTube conspiracy videos and look Boeing's service manuals and compare the parts. It was flight 77, FACT.
One more thing "fudman" have you given much though to taking a class on spelling? You may want to consider it, I know Canada has been closing schools right and left but you may still find a kindergarten class willing to teach you how to spell. Maybe next time you post a reply you should find a 6 year old to write it for you, it's pretty obvious that you never made it past preschool with your feeble attempt at spelling.
1. Where is the proof that any of the wreckage was identified? NTSB stated in Jul 18 2008!!!, that they have no records in the process of identifying the wreckage (all four planes)?
911blogger*com/node/16762
The FAA refuses the release of the wreckage serial numbers? Why the mystery in 07?
\911blogger*com/node/13149
2. Explain the CCTV Discrepancies:
1st Frame: 17:37:19
2nd Frame: 17:37:19 (no secs expire? How? did time stop?)
By the way "fudman", The plane was a Boeing 757 not a "Bowing 747". It is so funny how you fools claim to know so much about aircraft yet you cant even spell the name of the plane! You see some ridiculous conspiracy video and claim to be an expert, then you claim everything in the stupid video is true! Are you people retarded? It sure seems so! I really don't care anyway, the fact of the matter is everyone who saw the crash saw a 757 not a missile. 757 parts were the only parts found.
wow u must feel real good making fun of a dislexic guy real fucking tough you fuy friend are a fucking nazi and beleive there nazi propiganda but its not your fault your just a drone
Dyslexics do not have the issues you have with spelling, you are simply a guy who never bothered to learn how to read or write, you also never learned how to punctuate! Nice try! It's always idiots like yourself who make such ridiculous claims about things you know nothing about! Before you make an even bigger ass of yourself do a little research, somewhere other than YouTube for once, you may find out that all your claims are wrong.
there is something so strange about the events that took place that day. i find this video really interesting and it ask's some significant questions
an why do most of the eye witnesses coment that it was a american airways 757 flying low over head. if u saw a large airoplane flying very low in n area without an airport you would not be thinking "oh my gosh its an american airways plane" you be thinking shit that is way too low.
A surplus Douglas Navy A-3s Skywarrior fired a missile (Phoenix?) just before impacting the Naval Command Center at the Pentagon. This happened roughly when the decoy (the real Flight 77) flew over the Pentagon.
A surplus Douglas Navy A-3s Skywarrior fired a missile (Phoenix?) just before impacting the Naval Command Center at the Pentagon. This happened roughly when the decoy (the real Flight 77) flew over the Pentagon.
This is probably the most laughable part of Hufschmid's Pentagon claims!!
No children. At the Pentagon? Is the Pentagon a school? lmfao.
And he's STILL going on about a global hawk hitting the building which has been totally proven false!
What about the 100+ eye witnesses that saw the AA jet? All liars? Could a global hawk punch through 3 rings? And produce that massive fireball? NO CHANCE.
You may, by now, have noticed that a lot of former government officials and high-ranking officers have turned against Bush. Rummy was never popular among the military professionals. He's an idiot. Do you really believe that career DoD people would keep quiet if they found evidence that their shitwad boss tried to kill them? I think NOT.
The police call line was to preserve evidence and get it out of the way of recovery efforts.
The blue box was actually a work tent. v=VtyzSL3Gaw
The searching line at 3:14 is picking up debris to get it oput of the way of the work surface that had to be placed to keep recovery equipment from sinking into the mud.
Check the men walking around behind the pick-up crew. The one above the word "Hits" in the banner appears to be wearing and FBI logo on the back of his jacket. They are documenting what is found.
Please watch this video below and explain why the support columns where the plane impacted the Pentagon are bent outwards instead inwards? The plane was traveling in towards the building, right?
They are not bent outward. They are bent to the left. Notice the shoring that appears later. That was placed around the columns and they are flush with the facade.
The plane came from the right. The thicker part of the wing entered at an agnle where those columns are, and the lighter part of it sheared off to the left of that point. That would shove the columns to the left.
Parts were recovered inside the building. So some of the plane travled into/through the building. Using simple logic, the columns should definitely bent inward or destroyed.
The men in white shirts at 0:25 are probably FBI or MPI. The one in front appears to be wearing a shoulder holster. There were fire trucks and ambulances arriving, they would have run over the scrap, with damage to both evidence and vehicles. It had to be removed, and these guys are not needed to fight fires or transport crispy critters to the ambulances. Gee, how can they be useful? Maybe safeguarding evidence? And it is obviously sheet metal. There are rivet holes.
If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF) and radio-radar-navigation systems.
"16 April 2006, Source: The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Moussaoui trial exhibits and documents"
So does anyone know if this is an 'official' set of photos or are the supposed pentagon bodies fake? I can't see how the plane would fit in the facade of that building, so this is puzzling me. Reply to this if you know more...
The fuselage of an airliner is highly compressible and fragile. All that needed to fit in were the rotor disks and the deck with the seats attached. More than enough room for that. The bodies were all found INSIDE the building.
02:20 Avery is knowingly attempting to mislead the public by stating that these guys are taking away, when in reality they aey bringing ti into not out of.
if you look at the video of the pentagon before the roof collapsed, you will see my problem about the cover-up. Debunk this. DID? or HOW? did the wings get into the building to burn up and disappear??? THERE IS NO WING HOLES LIKE THE WTC 1 & 2 AND THE WINGS AREN'T LIEING ON THE GROUND? Neither are wing parts?? DID? they fold up like an umbrella to make it in that 16' hole????
yeah, i thought that was fishy when i saw those two men picking up pieces of the aircraft.I mean they weren't even dressed for the occasion. Im glad you pointed that out. Excellent video man!!
This vid is completly uncredible. Why didnt the police arrest those guys? Well its pretty hard for police to arrest federal agents. We have no clue where that pic was taken. They could have been picking up shit hundreds of feet away from the actual crash. Maybe the "missing" bodies were in the "secret" box and they just didnt want body parts all over the news.
Oh, so my friend who put her sister on Flight 77 that day and the two flight attendants I was acquainted with are all part of the government conspiracy? Also the members of the Arlington and Fairfax County fire departments, and the 911 callers, etc. Wow, it is a big conspiracy!
There is plenty of real video showing "what" hit the Pentagon. If there is no mystery, why won't the government release it? It's plain and simple logic.
Who knows? I'm guessing somewhere buried in the FBI libraries somewhere. Frames are missing from the Pentagon security cam. Also, videos from neighboring businesses were confiscated by the FBI.
"I am curious, where is this?" Don't really know, but it's not a 757. View youtube video posted, "Did Flight 77 really hit the Pentagon on 911? (Part Seven-A)"
Your friend? Put her sister? On a flight that was not schedualed to fly? Would you contact your friend and see if she happens to have a picture of her sister departing at the AAL gate? How about a ticket or a recipt for a purchase like a gift or something. Any shread of physical evidence whatsoever?
The Cruise Missile only has a wingspan of 12 feet. Kinda hard to hit light poles and damage a generator with that wingspan wouldn't it? 757's wingspan 124.10'. Certainly would hit the light poles and generator wouldn't it? Kinda hard for a missile with only a 4' diameter body to cause a 20' diameter hole now would it? It was Flight 77 folks.
My husband saw the fire and drove past it before 11 am that day (before the roads were all closed down.) There were thousands of barefoot secretaries and other people walking home then. They were told to leave and could not recover their cars in the North parking lot. The people you show are moving an assembled emergency support tent. The people picking up things were part of the investigative team--just because you say they weren't, doesn't make it true.
You are distorting the truth by selectively choosing and distorting your facts. Many witnesses, including people I know, saw an American Airline airplane hit the Pentagon. The 911 emergency calls verify that. There is no mystery, other than that no one captured it on video.
"There is no mystery, other than that no one captured it on video." The Pentagon security caught the whole thing. Unfortunately, there is no plane, the white vapor trail is indicative of a missile, frames are missing, it's stamped with the wrong date, and the shadows are very weird. It was obviously tampered with. Why? There is no mystery???
Augh it was or was not "captured on video" 1) Pentagon CCTV at least three cameras. 2) the security camers and as we can plainly see is faked. 3) Washington Blvd., VDOT Traffic Camera would show conclusively the actual plane it's self! 4) Citgo's CCTV, 5) Columbia Pike Parking 3-6 Lots CCTV, 6) Navy Annex CCTV, 7) Columbia Pike Parking 1-2 Lots CCTV, 8) Virginia Department Of Transportation, Smart Traffic Center CCTV all would have evidence of a shadow.
WANTED: PHOTO HOUNDS; Calling on all Americans living in or planning to visit Arlington, take pictures of the "supposid" AAL-77 flight path and post them on WebShots and Flickr for downloading to the rest of us.
People who think that a plane hit the Pentagon have shit in the fucking head. Where are the plane and bodies? Even in the video of the Pentagon you can see a light but no plane. I´m gonna ask a question with one trully answer: why the second airplane that crashed in the Twin Towers didn´t have windows? Because it was a military plane with no passengers.
"People who think that a plane hit the Pentagon have shit in the fucking head"\
People who resort to namecalling have no credibility whatsoever. There are pieces of the plane (hint: when a plane crashes, it does not remain in tact), the rest is BS like your question about the plane. You must not be familiar with the Boeing 767 at all angles, it WAS a United Airlines 767 in older livery (why many people *might* think it looks like a military jet could be the choice of colors).
The blue tarp mystery photo was actually a tent, its not a box. Notice they are carrying it ONTO THE LAWN towards the Pentagon. Tents were used for the cleanup crew later that day and days after. Photo's are everywhere. Notice the white top of that tent, and then look at the other tents more visiable, identical
Weighing all the facts (60 tons of plane dissapeared, but odd pieces found, no bodies,Pentagon security cam), I do believe something other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. The damage is indicative of a missile or some sort of explosive; damage relatively contained to the impact area, low fire damage (jet fuel??), second exit hole 9ft deep.
i agree with you, i also think that what hit the towers, being the planes yeah they hit but i think it took more than that to bring down those towers...oh yeah for burning jet fuel to bring towers down but yet witnesses herd following explosions before the towers went down...Dur THINK About it...just like the movie sum of all fears someone else attacks our country and tries to get us to blame Iraq, i support our men and women over there not the war it self
Before we ask where did flight 77 go as in Sept., 11, 2001 shouldn't you be asking where was AAL N644AA the night before? Did it arrive at Dulles? A check with the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics BTS shows it was not scheduled to fly as Flight 77. There is not a FLight 77 according to the BTS.
They hide the mystery object in a box that looks like fireman tents. The Question is right Do you actually believe Flight 77 really hit El Pentágono? I don't.
Top three responses for the believers of the official story. 1. This is bullshit. 2. F-you. If you don't like this country, move to Iraq. 3. (My personal fav) An attempt to make up their own rules to explain the odd occurences of 911.
Even though these events have never happened before or after 911, everyone should believe them. Greatest hits: Huge planes fit into tiny holes, planes are invisible in video cams (wonder woman's plane?), huge steel melts (err, weakens)from small fires, massive buildings crumble in seconds from fire, planes and passengers completely dissapear upon impact.
The hole extended quite a bit to either side of the big gap. The blades of the turbines and the engine shrouds shatter or otherwise ablate when you pass them through a wall.
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
/watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist fishy 911
If you moved from the TV/comp you would mediately know that this large blue box is a tent
2:44 man with glasses has his right hand on TENT skeleton tubes - and this tent is slightly higher closer tu as and lower further to us - so it is posible to look inside and see that it is empty and without FLOR - is your missile part is hovering , or maybe genie holds it?
Overkillerr 5 months ago
Fine,ok if you ppl say so a plane hitting the Pentagon, but what are those ppl doing walking in that CRIME seen in that formation? ....ohh they was heading out for lunch to a local subway restaurant that's it, look you blind sum brain washD ppl can talk about edit all you want BUT those normal dressed citizens R not edited nor R those ppl Carrying that box
3zer05 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At a Pentagon briefing the day after 9/11 Ed Plaugher (fire chief) who put out the fire at the Pentagon said there was only small pieces of the plane left but no large sections like fuselage engine and even seats. The Pentagon said that there were no identifiable pieces of plane left except for black box. There was no evidence but it waaass a plane and they say a fire melted and vaporized all identifiable pieces.
However they managed to fingerprint the bodies? Strange.
coronobog 5 months ago
What a joke of a video!
Maybe if you used color in this piece of shit video, you might see that the scraps had the same paint scheme as flight 77. Thruthers...always hiding the real facts!
kanukster 7 months ago
muzicmaker2001 7 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 Ha! Ha! Truthers! I see you conveniently ignored my comment. Was there a different reason for not adding color to this video, Hmmm?
As for your "real" facts. All the real evidence is right at your finger tips, just google it. No need to create evidence like your purporting here.
kanukster 7 months ago
@kanukster
Scraps for an 80 ton plane? This might help your imagination. Cameraman Bob Pugh was on scene approx 10 mins after impact and he states there are only "dinner-plate sized" and "2X3 ft pieces" on the lawn. No recoginzable plane parts; wings, tail, cockpit, luggage, chairs, bodies, etc...
watch?v=-xtEJ4zrIPM
muzicmaker2001 7 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 Ha! Ha! Once again you didn't respond to my comment concerning you removing the color from your 'conveniently' edited video!
"Imagination"...? I'm not the one with the distorted imagination. I've seen the videos showing the correlation of the pieces to the EXACT plane. I've seen the photos showing the engine, landing gear, wheel assembly.
In fact, in order for you to make this, you must have seen the other photos showing the mentioned items, you just chose not to show them!
kanukster 7 months ago
@kanukster
Let's make it easy. Why not YOU post any unedited video showing the 80 tons of wreckage on the lawn? Simple enough since you've seen them, right?
muzicmaker2001 7 months ago
@kanukster The straw-man argument you present here is exactly that. A deflection from the content of the video which shows people with no gloves picking up pieces of evidence. A line of people picking up evidence at the pentagon before investigators could get there. Care to explain why NTSB would deviate from standard procedure in a plane crash?
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@kanukster The scraps could very well be the same color of american airlines but even if so then would you mind explaining how it is legal or plauseable to tamper with evidence before a crime scene is investigated. No crime scene that I know of in this country is investigated that way. 100's of emegency workers with proper gear on yet these couple individuals see it fit to run out in normal office clothes and disrupt evidence? I could understand if they where inside looking for bodies......
mxdave91 4 months ago
They found Luggage tags and photo Ids. Bodies. Look it up on Google instead of being ignorant enough to listen to THIS guy.
crashnk68 7 months ago
@crashnk68
The reality: There is no photographic evidence of even one body identified as a passenger, no luggage or even one of the 239 chairs on-board. Look it up....
muzicmaker2001 7 months ago
Why is it I find more people believing that a 757 hit the pentagon and turn to dust then I do smart people. This is why nothing has been done about it
Smoothpackage 9 months ago
FBI hiding evidence
doughauf 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles Yeah, keep regurgitating these same theories over and over.
Google: Dov Zakheims remote airplane control technology.
Look into the RAW data of the black boxes. The "Official" report
was askewed according to the actual RAW data of the boxes.
It shows the flight deck door never even opened. Strange, because we we're
lead to believe Muslim w/box cutters barged in. Also, 60+ cctv cameras
and NO video of crash and plane flying OVER Pentagon. Hmmmm..... you were saying?
PeaceIsRad 1 year ago
@PeaceIsRad "The "Official" report was askewed according to the actual RAW data of the boxes. It shows the flight deck door never even opened..." Of course the FDR never showed the door flight deck door opened because thats what it is suppose to show. 757-2 FDR's DO NOT report an open/close door status, CLOSED is the default status, no matter how many times it is opened. In 1997 that status was added to the FDR data frame in 757-3 FDR's and above.
lcspies 2 months ago
hahaha nice ending!!
wicked3737 1 year ago
Global Hawk didn't exist until 2006, and it doesn't have the mass to penetrate 3 buildings like Flight 77 did.
The "box" is a emergency Tent.
The people wearing "No gloves" holding debris could be in shock, and exerting obsessive behavior.
The "clean up crew" could be helping to collect as much of the airplane as possible, even small piece the size of your thumb can give a clue as to what occured.
They even found one of the victims wedding bands at the WTC site.
This video = fail.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
On March 21, 2001, aircraft number 982003, the third ACTD aircraft produced, set an official world endurance record for UAVs, at 30 hours, 24 minutes and 1 second, flying from Edwards Airbase. Check your facts buddy.
the1337monster 1 year ago
Fine, it wasn't in service, it was a prototype still being worked on by its contractor, no Government agency nor branch of the military would be able to suddenly fly it off somewhere unoticed and fly it into a building.
And it still at 11 tons wasn't enough to cause the damage.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
Isn't live video great?
watch?v=-xtEJ4zrIPM
find the wreckage? note how the most intense fire in the clip? the generator? hmm, what about the jet fuel? and this is directly after impact....think moron
seeknthetruth 2 years ago
Lame!, the big mystery box, its the Pentagon!, you don't think there might be some sensitive items inside?
Your a fool,
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
The big mystery blue box you dumbe shit is a tent for placing human remains in.
yes thats very strange for a crash site!
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
they don't just pile all of the bodies in one big box. the bodies (or parts) have to be identified and isolated..moron
seeknthetruth 2 years ago
You stupid fuck!, ITS NOT A BOX! that was my point!, its a tent for laying the remains out for identification, Truthers call it a box.
MORON
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
see any bodies idiot? to be exact, 184 bodies??? sure, they're all in that tiny ass hole? lol any wreckage? how about wreckage from the cockpit, wings, tail, fuselage, engines, chairs, luggage? i think the government was counting on idiots like you believing this crap. mission accomplished...lol
seeknthetruth 2 years ago
YES I DO DUMBFUCK!
757's are made to be light and hollow, fill them with fuel and then slam them into a Indiana limestone wall at 450+mph with 121,000 lbs of thrust, its a pretty good chance FUCKALL that looks like a plane will be left, YOU STUPID FUCKING TRUTHER RETARD, have you EVER attended ONE crash site in you life?, well? let me guess NO!, and you have no flight or engineering experience: what a surprise! NOW FUCK OFF, your TOOOO stupid for me to bother with!
/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
seen it before. why is all the wreckage isolated? where's all the wreckage and hundreds of tiny bits of debris around the impact hole. ya know..where the plane actually crashed moron? planted..yes, wouldn't you say the wreckage shown in the clip is probably less than 1 ton of the total 80 ton plane... did the chairs and luggage just vanish also?...get a clue moron
seeknthetruth 2 years ago
Seek the truth MY ARSE, all you are is another crazy truther cult follower
I can't be bothered, if you want to see my posts go here, I'm taking a break from you fuckheads
/watch?v=iS2rlAoKiy4&feature=email
I hate Bush, war, liars you wankers attack anyone who points out the problem with your theories.
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
And here are photo's of the victims you stupid fuck
(w)(w)(w)(DOT)911research(DOT)com/pentagon/evidence/photos/index.html
And I have a close up as well if you really enjoy seeing a human being chared, but then I'm sure you've never been in the fire service either, am I right?, I have 15 years. Most of my life around aviation, I live In south Australia, anytime you or your truther buddies want to come see my CV your welcome, you calling me an idiot?, thats rich.
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
moron, that's an exhibit from the Moussaoui Trial showing a few victims that were inside at impact. 184 people with 64 being from Flight 77 supposedly died inside this small impact area. where are they idiot? i really don't care who you are..and yes, i'm calling you an idiot.
seeknthetruth 2 years ago
Sorry i don't take abuse from fucks like you, you want to act tuff, come do it in person, like I said not interested, your too thick.
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
open minded but this is lame, u can show video and spin it anyway u want.
Get some real evidence.
ujack71 2 years ago
Those two agent" guys were'nt picking up scraps, they were laying the scraps out for the photo shoot we now all see as "evidence"
dobberdoss 2 years ago 8
can someone give this guy a class of kids to bore
sopranoquad 2 years ago
Can someone give Sopranoquad a slap with the truth stick.
stoovil666 2 years ago 2
1.) Witnesses were asked to help pick up debris from Flight 77
2.) That blue tarp is a tent! durrrr
3.) Anybody that believes this garbage is very ignorant
FlexMasterFlex 2 years ago
Yeah, right. When was the last witnesses were asked to help clean up the debris from a plane crash site? Let alone, a supposed terrorist attack? You are a complete moron.
seeknthetruth 2 years ago
1. By someone breaking the law?
2. Ive never seen a TENT at the site of a terrorist hit OR on the lawn of the pentagon duuuuuurrr
3. Anybody who believes this was Flight 77's debris is v v v v ignorant
stoovil666 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
Please check out¨
´New Documentary- The Pentagon Witnesses´
9 parts
VERY IMPORTANT
onesliceshort 2 years ago
stupidmoron isnt - a stupid moron-hes a shill. watch the video and decide what you think.
bigc028282 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I want to thank everyone that participated in this "False Flag Attack".
I am so proud that a few people in the military died so that I could have cheap gas for my car and also so that my defense, oil and contruction related stocks went up in value. A few dead military personnel are well worth most of us making money and saving on gas. The base building in Iraq has made many of us very rich. Those stocks have soared. Bless those that died for our net worth
marinello6 2 years ago
islam must end
nuke meka
JegErNitro 2 years ago
Rascist son of a bitch! Go fuck your self with Serbian faggot!
Mesina2 2 years ago
i really hope noones acually listening to this guy..lol he doesnt know anything. and in 2:12 its a tent..lmao funny how little evidence they need to foll all these idiots.
911letsroll 2 years ago
a... a... aa........
a tent, u animal????????
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago
A tent
On the pentagon lawn
OK - Like you KNOW that. Proof?
Funny how you supposedly know this when no one has suggested it's a tent. Only an idiot would believe that line of guys cleaning up are 'rescue' workers. Hiding any trace of illicit govt activity more like.
stoovil666 2 years ago 3
INSIDE JOB!!!!!!!!
Enferushostis 2 years ago 3
We shouldn't let somebody to keep filling our brains with the stuff they want and snatch our own ideas and opinions.Today in this world it is very easy to make fool of hundreds and thousands of people through the controlled media.
fahadDaar 2 years ago
Comment removed
fahadDaar 2 years ago
I m surprised after reading the comments that,still,there are people on this planet who think that 911 attacks wasn't inside job.This is what i use to think and voted for Bush.But when i started thinking about this event and the international media instead of just watching american media,i regretted voting Bush.I think we should start looking deep into the international current affairs through all kinds of media to get a larger picture and to make a better decision.
fahadDaar 2 years ago
"we had to destroy the village in order to save it." vietnam vet circa 1968
"Some might ask, how in the world could the Secretary of Defense attack the Pentagon in front of its people? To them I reply, I have no desire to attack the Pentagon; I want to liberate it. We need to save it from itself."
rumsfeld speech given on 09/10/2001
vengencefrom1979 2 years ago
why would we hit 3 buildings and almost 4 of our own buildings killing thousands? if the government did this then why wouldn't they just destroy one building instead of 3 and almost 4? if they did it that way it wouldn't be bringing up so much questions on what really happened on 9/11, just think of that! it wasn't an inside job!
magicman9438 2 years ago
the guy that made this is an idiot and needs to be shot my uncle was in the pentigon when that happened thank god he wasnt in that area if i had lost a loved one that day i would be sueing the shit out of this ass hole
rangerman2237 2 years ago
The guy who made this video has to be mentally ill, he cant understand why people are picking up aluminum from the plane crash? In part two he claims the high pressure compressor impeller with the fins sheared off is a engine out of a 'global hawk"! He didnt even check out his own claim! He claims that the aluminum parts being picked up arent from a plane. 757s are made of thin aluminum sheets, as thin as .041 inches! He thinks the plane is built of aluminum 1/2" thick! He is an idiot!
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
The guy is worried because government employees were gathering evidence (not "cleaning up" like the idiot narrator claims) Of coarse they weren't wearing "gloves and boots", they were at work at the Pentagon when flight 77 hit. The people lined up were the same! Whats wrong with government employees picking up plane parts for a government investigation? The item being carried may have been part of the fuselage they found with bodies strapped in their seats still, of coarse it was covered.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
Fools Paradise!!! I deduct from the way you are talking that you have no life.
jesterinoz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is proved, that the passenger Boeing did not run into the Pentagon. If the passenger Boeing did not run into the Pentagon, where 150 person which flied by this plane? Officially people have died in act of terrorism. And actually them have shot FBI?
Where alive people?
Where the plane?
StallinUSSR 3 years ago
Everyone Has Different Opinions,I See Your Way Of Thinking Whizkid..But If It Is A Inside Job,Everyone Is From The Gorvement. Is MONEY a problem for them? i dont think so..
would you leak any information...bein rich?
ThiagoMcr 3 years ago
Dealings With The Gorverment...Money Is NEVER a problem...Would You Leak? being rich...hm..
ThiagoMcr 3 years ago
sorry if anyone disagrees with this but im saying it.....i personally dont believe it was a inside job from the government for many reasons, but the main 1 is that there would be too many people involved and somebody, somewhere down the line would of talked or leaked information by now.
Sorry guys i just aint buyin it
sillywhizkid 3 years ago
Let's just forget about the fact that the offical story that attempts to explain the lack of any plane aluminium & titanium debris states that the fire was SOOO! intense that it "VAPORISED" most of the metal and all the luggage, yet that same "metal- & luggage-vaporising" fire allegedly left human DNA entact, let's all turn our eyes at what a REAL plane crash looks like...
/watch?v=2_6UIm9GdTc
/watch?v=BFQnQFr6is4
/watch?v=-LsDEGL88ko
/watch?v=LVOXkXbNeGw
... any questions?
statesRcountries 3 years ago 2
agree 100%
myronkelly67 3 years ago
50 tons of wreckage was removed from the Pentagon, everyone saw the plane, the bodies were found, one of the engines ws found outside, You idiots dont think about the fact that there were real people on that plane, if it didnt hit, tell me, where is the plane and the passengers? The families buried their loved ones that were found at the Pentagon. The passengers were talking to loved ones by phone right up to the point the plane hit the Pentagon. Only sick freaks think it didnt hit
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
hahahah 50 tons of wreckage what a load all they found were peices of the building stop making shit up when i see a pic of then taking a plane out of the pentagon il beleave that load of bull shit send me some pics of them removing a plane and that engin they found wasnt even a bowing 747 engin notice how its not 9tf tall and why is there only one hmmmm it melted? steel and titanium cant melt at those temps
fudman02 2 years ago 2
If you look at the engine you will notice that the radial impeller blades had been sheared off during the crash, you don't know much about jet engines do you? I didn't think so. The engine is easily identified as coming from flight 77, look at photos of the high pressure impeller and pics of the impellers found at the Pentagon and it is EASY to see they are the same parts. The impellers on the Rolls Royce engine used on 77 are not 9 feet in diameter anyway! You are a fool!
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
Not only are the impeller blades easily identified as coming from 77's engines so is the combustion outer cases found at the Pentagon. Every part of the engines found matches up PERFECTLY with the Rolls Royce engines used on flight 77. There are also photos of many MANY other EASILY identified parts from flight 77 including the landing gear! I think you should stop looking at YouTube conspiracy videos and look Boeing's service manuals and compare the parts. It was flight 77, FACT.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
One more thing "fudman" have you given much though to taking a class on spelling? You may want to consider it, I know Canada has been closing schools right and left but you may still find a kindergarten class willing to teach you how to spell. Maybe next time you post a reply you should find a 6 year old to write it for you, it's pretty obvious that you never made it past preschool with your feeble attempt at spelling.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
Here's a couple of question for you?
1. Where is the proof that any of the wreckage was identified? NTSB stated in Jul 18 2008!!!, that they have no records in the process of identifying the wreckage (all four planes)?
911blogger*com/node/16762
The FAA refuses the release of the wreckage serial numbers? Why the mystery in 07?
\911blogger*com/node/13149
2. Explain the CCTV Discrepancies:
1st Frame: 17:37:19
2nd Frame: 17:37:19 (no secs expire? How? did time stop?)
muzicmaker2001 2 years ago
By the way "fudman", The plane was a Boeing 757 not a "Bowing 747". It is so funny how you fools claim to know so much about aircraft yet you cant even spell the name of the plane! You see some ridiculous conspiracy video and claim to be an expert, then you claim everything in the stupid video is true! Are you people retarded? It sure seems so! I really don't care anyway, the fact of the matter is everyone who saw the crash saw a 757 not a missile. 757 parts were the only parts found.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
wow u must feel real good making fun of a dislexic guy real fucking tough you fuy friend are a fucking nazi and beleive there nazi propiganda but its not your fault your just a drone
fudman02 2 years ago 3
Dyslexics do not have the issues you have with spelling, you are simply a guy who never bothered to learn how to read or write, you also never learned how to punctuate! Nice try! It's always idiots like yourself who make such ridiculous claims about things you know nothing about! Before you make an even bigger ass of yourself do a little research, somewhere other than YouTube for once, you may find out that all your claims are wrong.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
my slains are wrond dude the theroy of a missile is o distorted your a fucking morron conco over
fudman02 2 years ago
??????????????????????????????
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
when the planes hit the trad center they cause massive fires so how come the same didnt happen here?
and i agree that is strange those two guys in suits picking up evidence surely they would have sealed the area off from the public?
natz1804 3 years ago
amen
myronkelly67 3 years ago
I have a better question? instead of the glass being half empty, lets say the glass is half full??? what do I mean???
Who says those guys are PICKING up debris and not DROPPING debris, since none of the debris is from a AA757? Right?
JCwasaJew 3 years ago
there is something so strange about the events that took place that day. i find this video really interesting and it ask's some significant questions
an why do most of the eye witnesses coment that it was a american airways 757 flying low over head. if u saw a large airoplane flying very low in n area without an airport you would not be thinking "oh my gosh its an american airways plane" you be thinking shit that is way too low.
natz1804 3 years ago
the military lined up and searched the desert of roswell new mexico after an aparent ufo crashed there
WarGamerHistorian 3 years ago
gloves and boots are super important guys!
xeldiablo113x 3 years ago 2
There is no boeing, it is a fake.
CommanderBomblastic 3 years ago
were is 757 then?
If it was a miissle were was it launced from?
Wouldn't the debris from the air craft be contained in the building?
PibatribickC 3 years ago
Good questions!
Sadly no one has come forward with the answers yet.
btypirate 3 years ago
"hey we just got hit by some hi-tech aircraft"
paimail21 3 years ago
A surplus Douglas Navy A-3s Skywarrior fired a missile (Phoenix?) just before impacting the Naval Command Center at the Pentagon. This happened roughly when the decoy (the real Flight 77) flew over the Pentagon.
OperationMockingbird 3 years ago
operation sickbird
Your claims of a Navy Skywarrior hitting the Pentagon are such laughable rubbish.
Name one eye witness who saw a military plane hit the Pentagon. You cant.
But there are over 100 who saw an American Airlines jet, as well as wreckage recovered & dna confirmed bodies of AA77 passengers.
terrymanning1 3 years ago
So how reliable are eyewitness testimonies then?
I bet I can find more people witnessing no such thing as a 757 hitting the Pentagon.
Do NOT rely on eyewitnesses! Look at photographic evidence! Photographs do not have bad memories or emotions that could distort their memories.
btypirate 3 years ago
A surplus Douglas Navy A-3s Skywarrior fired a missile (Phoenix?) just before impacting the Naval Command Center at the Pentagon. This happened roughly when the decoy (the real Flight 77) flew over the Pentagon.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
This is probably the most laughable part of Hufschmid's Pentagon claims!!
No children. At the Pentagon? Is the Pentagon a school? lmfao.
And he's STILL going on about a global hawk hitting the building which has been totally proven false!
What about the 100+ eye witnesses that saw the AA jet? All liars? Could a global hawk punch through 3 rings? And produce that massive fireball? NO CHANCE.
terrymanning1 4 years ago
Oh nearly forgot, as for the blue box he says is a 'cloak' to hide a chunk of a global hawk. I nearly soiled myself!
Check out the RKOwens4 video '911 Debunked: Mysterious Blue Box Uncovered'
Yes, its just a staging tent used to keep items dry etc.
Eric Hufschmid. You have to hand it to him. He's a great comedian.
terrymanning1 4 years ago
You may, by now, have noticed that a lot of former government officials and high-ranking officers have turned against Bush. Rummy was never popular among the military professionals. He's an idiot. Do you really believe that career DoD people would keep quiet if they found evidence that their shitwad boss tried to kill them? I think NOT.
The police call line was to preserve evidence and get it out of the way of recovery efforts.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
The blue box was actually a work tent. v=VtyzSL3Gaw
The searching line at 3:14 is picking up debris to get it oput of the way of the work surface that had to be placed to keep recovery equipment from sinking into the mud.
Check the men walking around behind the pick-up crew. The one above the word "Hits" in the banner appears to be wearing and FBI logo on the back of his jacket. They are documenting what is found.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
leftysergeant (or any debunker):
Please watch this video below and explain why the support columns where the plane impacted the Pentagon are bent outwards instead inwards? The plane was traveling in towards the building, right?
youtube[dot]com/watch?v=A4XYkXNd6Yg
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
They are not bent outward. They are bent to the left. Notice the shoring that appears later. That was placed around the columns and they are flush with the facade.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
Looks outward to me, but shouldn't be inward? A nearly 100 ton plane hit the building at 500 mph.
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
The plane came from the right. The thicker part of the wing entered at an agnle where those columns are, and the lighter part of it sheared off to the left of that point. That would shove the columns to the left.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
Parts were recovered inside the building. So some of the plane travled into/through the building. Using simple logic, the columns should definitely bent inward or destroyed.
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
All of them inboard of the engines were destroyed. What look like columns over by the spools are actually fallen pieces of cieling or floor slab.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
Leftysergeant is one of the countless shills on YouTube.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago 3
operation sickbird
And you are one of the countless 'truther' parrots on youtube.
Your claims of a Navy Skywarrior hitting the Pentagon are such laughable rubbish.
Name one eye witness who saw a military plane hit the Pentagon. You cant.
But there are over 100 who saw an American Airlines jet, as well as wreckage recovered & dna confirmed bodies of AA77 passengers.
terrymanning1 3 years ago
The men in white shirts at 0:25 are probably FBI or MPI. The one in front appears to be wearing a shoulder holster. There were fire trucks and ambulances arriving, they would have run over the scrap, with damage to both evidence and vehicles. It had to be removed, and these guys are not needed to fight fires or transport crispy critters to the ambulances. Gee, how can they be useful? Maybe safeguarding evidence? And it is obviously sheet metal. There are rivet holes.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
i wish he would stop saying that a global hawk hit the pentagon
skittle2k6 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF) and radio-radar-navigation systems.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
Excellent video:
youtube[dot]com/watch?v=0Om9_Lbco6A
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
this dude sounds like a fruit
ShiftStyle 4 years ago 2
cryptome[DOT]org/911/911-kill[DOT]htm0
"16 April 2006, Source: The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Moussaoui trial exhibits and documents"
So does anyone know if this is an 'official' set of photos or are the supposed pentagon bodies fake? I can't see how the plane would fit in the facade of that building, so this is puzzling me. Reply to this if you know more...
bigotryofhistory 4 years ago
The fuselage of an airliner is highly compressible and fragile. All that needed to fit in were the rotor disks and the deck with the seats attached. More than enough room for that. The bodies were all found INSIDE the building.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
02:20 Avery is knowingly attempting to mislead the public by stating that these guys are taking away, when in reality they aey bringing ti into not out of.
Laffey724 4 years ago
ha ha... laffey, we're laughing at you again...
funny thing... nobody saw anyone bringing in truckloads of wreckage... you're funny... you make me laugh every time you post something!
pachydermpower 4 years ago
if you look at the video of the pentagon before the roof collapsed, you will see my problem about the cover-up. Debunk this. DID? or HOW? did the wings get into the building to burn up and disappear??? THERE IS NO WING HOLES LIKE THE WTC 1 & 2 AND THE WINGS AREN'T LIEING ON THE GROUND? Neither are wing parts?? DID? they fold up like an umbrella to make it in that 16' hole????
honestheart67 4 years ago 4
Its all a big coverup!! I can see it now!! the 757 could never have fit in that hole!!! wake up america
TherelsNoConspiracy 4 years ago 2
this opens up so many things to me
DaRkNaRutO2653 4 years ago 2
OMG you give GW to much credit, you f-ing losers!
jshabadoo 4 years ago
yeah, i thought that was fishy when i saw those two men picking up pieces of the aircraft.I mean they weren't even dressed for the occasion. Im glad you pointed that out. Excellent video man!!
atg88 4 years ago
WATCH "UFO Twin Towers" IT'S CRAZY !!
lnlgs 4 years ago
Global hawk my ass
Johannes0505 4 years ago
There's no doubt that the missing passenger plane was not involved. See all the related videos.
matts90 4 years ago
This vid is completly uncredible. Why didnt the police arrest those guys? Well its pretty hard for police to arrest federal agents. We have no clue where that pic was taken. They could have been picking up shit hundreds of feet away from the actual crash. Maybe the "missing" bodies were in the "secret" box and they just didnt want body parts all over the news.
greghouse131 4 years ago
Aren't you assuming they were federal agents? Also, thats alot of "what ifs" and "maybes".
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
This video analysis commentary is excellent!
the50s60s70s 4 years ago
I like the part where the clown stands on his head
atom2009 4 years ago
Oh, so my friend who put her sister on Flight 77 that day and the two flight attendants I was acquainted with are all part of the government conspiracy? Also the members of the Arlington and Fairfax County fire departments, and the 911 callers, etc. Wow, it is a big conspiracy!
mskysluv 4 years ago
There is plenty of real video showing "what" hit the Pentagon. If there is no mystery, why won't the government release it? It's plain and simple logic.
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
"There is plenty of real video showing "what" hit the Pentagon."
I am curious, where is this?
travelsonic 4 years ago
Who knows? I'm guessing somewhere buried in the FBI libraries somewhere. Frames are missing from the Pentagon security cam. Also, videos from neighboring businesses were confiscated by the FBI.
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
"I am curious, where is this?" Don't really know, but it's not a 757. View youtube video posted, "Did Flight 77 really hit the Pentagon on 911? (Part Seven-A)"
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
Your friend? Put her sister? On a flight that was not schedualed to fly? Would you contact your friend and see if she happens to have a picture of her sister departing at the AAL gate? How about a ticket or a recipt for a purchase like a gift or something. Any shread of physical evidence whatsoever?
CobiaAGSS2 4 years ago
Cruise Missile Dimensions: 21' long, 4' diameter, 12' wingspan
Flight 77 (757) Dimensions: 155.3' long, 12.4' diameter, 124.10' wingspan
The Cruise Missile only has a wingspan of 12 feet. Kinda hard to hit light poles and damage a generator with that wingspan wouldn't it? 757's wingspan 124.10'. Certainly would hit the light poles and generator wouldn't it? Kinda hard for a missile with only a 4' diameter body to cause a 20' diameter hole now would it? It was Flight 77 folks.
ThereIsNoConspiracy 4 years ago
God bless the people who died that day. There is no mystery. Stop wasting your time. Do something constructive!
mskysluv 4 years ago
My husband saw the fire and drove past it before 11 am that day (before the roads were all closed down.) There were thousands of barefoot secretaries and other people walking home then. They were told to leave and could not recover their cars in the North parking lot. The people you show are moving an assembled emergency support tent. The people picking up things were part of the investigative team--just because you say they weren't, doesn't make it true.
mskysluv 4 years ago
You are distorting the truth by selectively choosing and distorting your facts. Many witnesses, including people I know, saw an American Airline airplane hit the Pentagon. The 911 emergency calls verify that. There is no mystery, other than that no one captured it on video.
mskysluv 4 years ago
"There is no mystery, other than that no one captured it on video." The Pentagon security caught the whole thing. Unfortunately, there is no plane, the white vapor trail is indicative of a missile, frames are missing, it's stamped with the wrong date, and the shadows are very weird. It was obviously tampered with. Why? There is no mystery???
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
Augh it was or was not "captured on video" 1) Pentagon CCTV at least three cameras. 2) the security camers and as we can plainly see is faked. 3) Washington Blvd., VDOT Traffic Camera would show conclusively the actual plane it's self! 4) Citgo's CCTV, 5) Columbia Pike Parking 3-6 Lots CCTV, 6) Navy Annex CCTV, 7) Columbia Pike Parking 1-2 Lots CCTV, 8) Virginia Department Of Transportation, Smart Traffic Center CCTV all would have evidence of a shadow.
CobiaAGSS2 4 years ago
wow you people are idiots
bakanagaizin 4 years ago
WANTED: PHOTO HOUNDS; Calling on all Americans living in or planning to visit Arlington, take pictures of the "supposid" AAL-77 flight path and post them on WebShots and Flickr for downloading to the rest of us.
scriptor409 4 years ago
People who think that a plane hit the Pentagon have shit in the fucking head. Where are the plane and bodies? Even in the video of the Pentagon you can see a light but no plane. I´m gonna ask a question with one trully answer: why the second airplane that crashed in the Twin Towers didn´t have windows? Because it was a military plane with no passengers.
Chalcu06 5 years ago
"People who think that a plane hit the Pentagon have shit in the fucking head"\
People who resort to namecalling have no credibility whatsoever. There are pieces of the plane (hint: when a plane crashes, it does not remain in tact), the rest is BS like your question about the plane. You must not be familiar with the Boeing 767 at all angles, it WAS a United Airlines 767 in older livery (why many people *might* think it looks like a military jet could be the choice of colors).
travelsonic 4 years ago
The blue tarp mystery photo was actually a tent, its not a box. Notice they are carrying it ONTO THE LAWN towards the Pentagon. Tents were used for the cleanup crew later that day and days after. Photo's are everywhere. Notice the white top of that tent, and then look at the other tents more visiable, identical
ShiftStyle 5 years ago
So, you actually believe Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?
muzicmaker2001 5 years ago
So, you actually believe that a missile hit the Pentagon?
ShiftStyle 5 years ago
Weighing all the facts (60 tons of plane dissapeared, but odd pieces found, no bodies,Pentagon security cam), I do believe something other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. The damage is indicative of a missile or some sort of explosive; damage relatively contained to the impact area, low fire damage (jet fuel??), second exit hole 9ft deep.
muzicmaker2001 5 years ago
I was not talking about what hit The Pentagon.
ShiftStyle 5 years ago
i agree with you, i also think that what hit the towers, being the planes yeah they hit but i think it took more than that to bring down those towers...oh yeah for burning jet fuel to bring towers down but yet witnesses herd following explosions before the towers went down...Dur THINK About it...just like the movie sum of all fears someone else attacks our country and tries to get us to blame Iraq, i support our men and women over there not the war it self
Cowboy1989 4 years ago
Then where did flight 77 go?
Myhousemf2 4 years ago
Before we ask where did flight 77 go as in Sept., 11, 2001 shouldn't you be asking where was AAL N644AA the night before? Did it arrive at Dulles? A check with the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics BTS shows it was not scheduled to fly as Flight 77. There is not a FLight 77 according to the BTS.
CobiaAGSS2 4 years ago
They hide the mystery object in a box that looks like fireman tents. The Question is right Do you actually believe Flight 77 really hit El Pentágono? I don't.
ElPeruanoUFO 5 years ago
Get a life!lol
juancho4life 5 years ago
Word up ;) omg
Rob89bie 5 years ago
You don't believe this is revealing?
ElPeruanoUFO 5 years ago
Same bullshit, different smear on the toilet seat.
travelsonic 4 years ago
Top three responses for the believers of the official story. 1. This is bullshit. 2. F-you. If you don't like this country, move to Iraq. 3. (My personal fav) An attempt to make up their own rules to explain the odd occurences of 911.
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
I hate #2 - these people - forget 9-11 - alot of these people who say this are so arrogant they forget about the freedoms of thir own country.
travelsonic 4 years ago
Even though these events have never happened before or after 911, everyone should believe them. Greatest hits: Huge planes fit into tiny holes, planes are invisible in video cams (wonder woman's plane?), huge steel melts (err, weakens)from small fires, massive buildings crumble in seconds from fire, planes and passengers completely dissapear upon impact.
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
"Huge planes fit into tiny holes"
757 fuselage diameter fits the hole.
" planes are invisible in video cams "
1 frame per second doesn't pick up much.
"planes and passengers completely "
Nah, I did a google image search that proved helpful in debunking this statement before.
travelsonic 4 years ago
"757 fuselage diameter fits the hole."
And what of the wings, tail, two 9 ton engines?
"1 frame per second doesn't pick up much."
Was this the only camera pointing at the front of the world's most secure building? Even Walmart has more cameras.
"google image search"
Link?
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
The hole extended quite a bit to either side of the big gap. The blades of the turbines and the engine shrouds shatter or otherwise ablate when you pass them through a wall.
leftysergeant 4 years ago