picasso video

[lleca97]

ma di che anno è?????????

[kdizzzle123]

to be an artist all u need is drugs. after ur done with drugs you are an artist. nomater what

[whitbyjet65]

Pity he was a sadistic bull fighting fan.

[raeart]

awesome newwssss

[ytrovid]

koenbp...he's more alive than you...defficent...see, your problem is the lack of capacity to understand art ( you just belive you do...)...you look to me so "naked"

keep your negativity for yourself you stonehead...

[crackerslice89]

Timmy bear is a fag.

[dadapicassomomo]

what documentary is this from?

[MsArtTart]

I have it, but would have to look it up. Sorry! You can find it in art supply catalogs aimed at art teachers.

[sonikopixies]

THANX

4THIS

VIDEO!

[GenericGene]

Thank you - I just saw Picasso Art Collection in Brisbane recently at the Queensland Art Gallery - it was superb.

[numbard]

whoever says that a professional artist can actually steal anything is a fool. Ideas are not to be hoarded, and style is just a classification. so chill out and enjoy picasso's work, it changed everything

[johnhatkinson]

'If there is something to steal, I steal it!.

[numbard]

that said, it is not to say that artists don't throw the word around alot. I forget who said it but the quote is

"mediocre artists borrow, great artists steal"

[johnhatkinson]

That would be Picasso.

[Timdrumslove]

sorry man... i'm a bloody ignorant... hahaha... fag

[Timmybear]

While I can understand your frustration with that comment, I'm not sure 'fag' is really the best way to respond. :)

[FreedomChicken]

Picasso promoted a wider interest in the Work of Africans.

[1aaronwaugh]

hahahaha nice way to say Stolen

[borninparis]

Bad artists copy, good artists imitate, Geniuses steal - Stravinsky

[numbard]

without "stealing" most movements would never have happened

[enzofabioarcangeli]

you are a bloody ignorant. and a bit stupid too. The opposite is true: ALL THE ARTISTS in Paris (Brancusi, Mpdigliani: everybody) went crazy - around 1905 -with everything was tropical (NOT ONLY , not specifically african) and they created the ARTE MULATA which Modernity itself, the global culture today (something similar happened in the 1930s with blues in Chicago), Study a few years and some dozen books your subject before talking !!!

[Timdrumslove]

ha... he's dumb??? you can't work out punctuation

[enzofabioarcangeli]

YOUR IGNORANCE IS ABSOLUTE: OK THE PUNCTUATION? Vaffa ...

[i742]

funny how ppl takes michelangelo or other artits and picassom trying to make examples or anologies, using their style and work. modern art is picasso, michelangelo, mantegna or messina are artists of a total different style and era. picasso can be criticized in the modern art contest only.

[numbard]

all art exists in the same timeframe, regardless if it is from a hundred or a thousand years ago. The reason people still look at Michaelangelo and the like is that they are STILL RELEVANT.

[improja]

Good call. absolutely true

[dontuwid]

Blah, blah , blah you guys are only good in talking. ART is DOING it can be a primitive approach or whatever as long as you practice your own style/method - that is what you call skill. Oil paint was invented for painting flesh but no realist ever succeeded to put nature into the canvas. You can copy nature but you will never put any physical world into your canvas. Picasso, was able to do it his canvases became nature because he created a PICASSO.

[dontuwid]

Blah, blah , blah you guys are only good in talking. ART is DOING it can be a primitive approach or whatever as long as you practice your own style/method - that is what you call skill. Oil paint was invented for painting flesh but no realist ever succeeded to put nature into the canvas. You can copy nature but you will never put any physical world into your canvas. Picasso, was able to do it his canvases became nature because he created a PICASSO.

[konzwambii]

Some say Picasso was no good, a fraud, or not better than any kid, yet strangely no one yet can draw as well. Academicians in particular tend to become bitter, and end up missing all that great art offers on its many levels (don't forget content, passion, composition, originality, economy of means, and a thousand other things). Instead they get hung up on "correct" rendering and cannot see the forest for the trees. Academicians typically lack the spirit to be a real artist.

[deadsnoopy1]

art is a long conversation over the ages and great artists bring something new to the conversation that should reflect their times and our changing sophistication using signs and symbols.

[rock3125]

well said, snoopy

[starvinartist8]

Yes! I agree!

[phelpstn]

Just cause someone has skill does not make them an artist! True art is a for of communication threw ones own interpretations. Art schools teach us to think out side of the box... not to draw the box the way you see it!

[polymath7]

I'm afraid I can only half agree. It helps to be able to draw the box as it appears.

[Kurturmis]

schools do teach students to think outside the box which is obviously a good thing but the state of many art schools including the one im attending, fail to teach and imrpove a persons artistic skills.

[Kurturmis]

. The more abstracted an artwork, the less skill involved, after all you should be able to paint an object traditionally before you can abstract it, but that's not happening. Art schools today no longer teach artistic skills to develop people's talent. Truly gifted people are left scratching theirs heads. Thanks Picasso :[, I hope I made my point. thx for reading..

[polymath7]

You're an impostor. You obviously don't know the first thing about Picasso and I doubt you could tell a Michelangelo from Raphael. I genuinely regret that I must be so blunt, but sophomoric bluster of this sort rapidly drains my patience.

[Kurturmis]

lol imposto aarrrh right i have read countless books on both Raphael and Michelangelo, as well as copied or should i say studied there works with my own hands.

[Kurturmis]

I'm all for anyone creating a painting or any artwork regardless of skill, where all allowed to express ourselves any way or form we want, but not everyone can paint a masterpiece. Thoughtless smearing of paint are not great works of art. We aren't all genius painters. That's the problem with modern art and Picasso. Less then average "artist" paint abstracted works that are hailed as great works of art. Without skill everyone's painting is equal to a Leonardo, Dali, or Michelangelo......

[polymath7]

Your comments are laughable, as it is obvious that you are entirely unaware that Picasso was a child prodigy who at the age of sixteen could draw in a traditional sense at least as skillfully as the three artists you mention (two of whom I greatly admire). I suggest you seek out a book titled "Picasso, the Development of a Genius, and prepare to be amazed.

[Kurturmis]

yes i have seen Picassos early work which everyone uses to validate him as an artist, i have yet to be impressed. I disagree with the idea that he could draw as good as any Renaisance artis, google "picasso fraud". Also goo

[cwegers]

The world without Picasso,no thanks, he changed everything.Your comparing classical music to Jazz.

[MissJessabeeseed]

o my gosh i heard about picasso!!!!!!! he paints soooo awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[MissJessabeeseed]

o my gosh i heard about picasso!!!!!!!!! he

[MissJessabeeseed]

o my gosh i heard about picasso!!!!!!!!! he paints awesome!!!

[Claronium780]

He's not my favorite artist, but for f**k sake he was still a pretty damn good artist WTF!!?

[YourGreatness]

Are you fckng kidding me Picasso is my fckin idol, he is Art!

[cybeavertoo]

if an artist touches u right in the heart, it doesnt matter what technique he or she used, what person he was, what position he or she is granted in history.

This picasso guy, whatever u think of him or his work, will stand out because of so much work with which he marveled artists and public of all the possibilities he discovered in art, and all the sensitivity he let shine through. in such a case u humbly stand back and realize u r just a grain of sand

[YourGreatness]

What is art?

[fritz501]

"Art is what you get away with" - Andy Warhol

[deuxhug]

believe me.you have nothing to do with art.

[cybeavertoo]

art is materialized sensitivity

[zepman79]

Most of Picasso's "legend" is just that, a legend. His so called child prodigy work is actually his father's. Google "picasso fraud" and see for yourself. Anyone that is a trained painter and has an artistic eye can tell you that different hands completed "his" early work. Too many people put artists on pedestels just because of their life histories, instead of taking their work at face value. Art has become a lifestyle, rather than a profession.

[fritz501]

That is the most stupid comment I ever hear about Picasso. On one hand Picasso is not even famous becouse of his early work. Picasso is, like LeCourbosier, the Beatles or Hendrix, a legend becouse he dare to broke the rules of his time and show the world new ways and new possibilities to approach art.

On the other hand, Picasso is not famous for been child prodigy, and, of course Art is a lifestyle you Stupid

[zepman79]

Supporters of Picasso use his early work to validate his later work. I was only stating the point that art should be valued for what it is and nothing more. Also, learn to spell and construct a sentence before you call someone stupid.

[fritz501]

Sorry zepman, English is not my first language. but still, you get the message.

[demarchisoft]

Have you ever really thought of what art is, since you seem so sure?

[rashomon66]

The bottom line is you don't like Picasso and so you are trying to invalidate his work by claiming [via conspiracy] that someone else did it. Your reason; Because no artist could have so many different styles. Hilarious. And, btw, people do take Picasso at face value - but when an artist is this good their lifestyles becomes news too.

[Exthulla]

No - Zepman has a point, and there is evidence to back this asserion. Picasso was also a tireless self-promoter and, in the words of one contemporary artist, a "toady to the rich and famous". He frequently disparaged other artists' work on political, not artistic grounds and was something of a hypocrite. Some of his work has merit but much does not. He was definitely NOT a genius or the "greatest painter" he is often made out to be. His reputation will plummet in the upcoming century.

[BZCAPMOOR]

that was imbecil beyond comprehension.

He used styles and invented styles.

That is why he is a genius.

[Kurturmis]

... hows your search going.... ....??

[Kurturmis]

I happend to make comments on two vids in the same day while looking up this untalented artist. Yes Picasso is an easy target! Having poluted the world with his with cough..."Masterpieces". Maybe if he created art with some substance to it I wouldnt be compelled to make such comments. I am allowed to express my opinion artnt I??

[fomedome]

He he I think you touched a nerve there kurturmus. piggles? what a wanker...

[piggles07]

Oh my god, that kurturmis guy so pissed me off.

[Kurturmis]

As a trained artist I disagree. Yes his early works where repersentational but his pictures where not anymore advanced then a person of his age. You must be impressed easily. "on par with Raphael" .....uummm ok... Google "art renewal center" Visit the site and read some articals written by real living master artist and see what they have to say about Picasso.

[dangermidget]

k.. this is the second post where i find kurturmis..jockin on picasso...easy target buddy? im gonna go seach kandinsky, kline, pollack, gorky, bacon, rothko, giacometti, calder, and whoever else i can find that might be an easy target and im sure youll be there

[brad1674]

the ARC has an aggressive 7th grader's mentality about art. Over emphasizing technical prowess deflates the basic concept of creating art- while essential acts like eating allows us to exist, the nonessential activity of creating art justifies our existence. all painting serves no practical purpose, be it vermeer or picasso. its just pigment over a piece of cloth attached to a wood frame. all art is subjective.

[Kurturmis]

pppsssshhh .... who would have a vaild opion? A group of artist who have a lifetime of experiance as artist and have mastered the art of painting, or some random guy on you tube?? hhmmm...

[cybeavertoo]

definitely the youtube-guy baby. If something gets in the way of personal sensitivity and art, it is thinking u v got knowledge over it. It always leads to these morbid discussions about technique vs sensitivity, and in the end is only used for condemning certain groups or people. All i ve read here is not so far away from the concept of 'entarte kunst' Does it ring a bell? Hail the new Academics!

[Exthulla]

I agree that ARC is too dogmatic, but remember that it arose in opposition to widespread fraud, charlatanism, self-delusion and a catastrophic collapse of standards at art colleges.

Art history is neither the province of the diehard Traditionalists OR dogmatic Modernists. It is not compulsory to accept everything we are told. Including everything about Picasso.

[brad1674]

but most people seem to compulsively accept what the ARC says. I don't have a problem with exposing fraud or advocating better technique at the academic level. the problem with ARC is that by its logic art MUST be representational, and MUST have and atelier technique. I'm no fan of picasso, but the ARC derides many works of art and artists that I love and would never consider "frauds".

[docattheradarstation]

which documentary does this come from?

[richardstoller]

crap. Was that a UFO while Picasso was picking his nose? More interesting than the rest of that blurry useless rubbish.

[iago333nautica]

Picasso, Niemeyer...

foram criadores de MAMARRACHOSSSSSS. Pedimos o fim dessa "arte" ridícula.

[YoSoyZuri]

Claramente eres un ignorante que probablemente no seas capaz de admirar, entender, o incluso respetar la espresion artistica. Tu mente no da la capacidad. Para copias de una imagen real, estan las camaras. Or el Realismo Clasico que es tambien maravilloso.

[iago333nautica]

Picasso, Niemeyer...

foram criadores de MAMARRACHOSSSSSS.

[iago333nautica]

(4)- Giotto, Ticiano, Rembrandt e Goya foram garndes pintores : eu sou apenas um divertidor do público que compreendeu o seu tempo eexplorou o melhor que pôde a imbecilidade, a vaidade, a avidez de seus contemporâneos. É uma amarga confissão a minha, mais dolorosa do que ela parece. Mas, ela tem o mérito de ser sincera" (FIM)

[iago333nautica]

(3)- A força de me divertir com todas essas brincadeiras, com todos esses quebra-cabeças, enigmas,e arabescos, eu fiquei célebre, e muito rapidamente. E a celebridade para um pintor significa vendas, lucros, fortuna,riqueza. E hoje, como o senhor sabe, eu sou famoso, eu sou rico. Mas, quando estou sozinho comigo mesmo, não tenha a coragem de me considerar um artista no sentido antigo e grande da palavra.

[iago333nautica]

(2)- "Na arte, o povo não procura mais consolação e exaltação, mas os refinados, os ricos, os ociosos, os destiladores de quintessências buscam o que é novo, estranho, extravagante, escandaloso. E eu mesmo, desde o cubismo e além dele, eu contentei esses mestres e esses críticos com todas as bizarrices mutáveis que me passaram pela cabeça, e quanto menos eles me compreendiam, mais eles me admiravam.

[iago333nautica]

Vou citar aqui, uma carta de Picasso ao amigo dele. Os números que colocarei no início de cada postagem, significa a ordem da postagem.

(1)- (Pablo Picasso, carta a Giovanni Papini, publicada em 1952. Citada in "Découvertes" n°90, 1972, editorial "Picasso pintado por si mesmo." Citado in "Cahiers de Chiré" n°4, 1989, p.354)

[DraculaVision]

Interesting that he had a copy of Michelangelo's slave. Picasso, as I understand it, was rather disparaging of the Sistine Chapel ceiling, saying it was like a "cartoon".

[Kurturmis]

"Picasso, as I understand it, was rather disparaging of the Sistine Chapel ceiling, saying it was like a "cartoon"

Thats interesting considering Picasso cant even draw well let a alone a cartoon or anything as complex as michelangelo. He has to discredit great works of art to make himself look better. He knows that his work is as technical as an 6 year old smearing paint on a canvas.

[piggles07]

You are an absolute retard. Not only did he draw in the classical style from a very young age, before his teens, but his drawings and etchings into his thirties were all masterpieces. Many historians consider his early work to be on par with Raphael. Good going ignoramus.

[ezrakudo]

what video/dvd is this from?

[dboyd]

Needs voice over as to where yound it, what it means to you, etc.-Don