a House Divided Against Itself .. the singular figure has the advantage
- who was it said a bad plan's better than none, some old master like Lasker or Tarrasch i can't recall .. you've got 'too many cooks' here, three super GMs w/ distinct styles and ideas, conflicting plans, danger of changing horses in midstream ..
Very nice analysis. Unfortunately "The World" would be better with just one GM suggestion, since theoretically, each GM could purse with a move a different strategy from the other two GMs thus shuffling from a 20 move calculus for example. But great game non the less :)
this is the most perfect game ive ever seen, even better than any bobby fischer´s games, i still think bobby is the best ever, but magnus is really close to that level
Anyone vs the world is full offailure. Carlson has only his opinion on the best moves and tactics. while the world has thegood and bad voting on moves causing nonproductive tactics and bad moves.
According to my opening book explorer retreating the knight to e7 is actually better than back to b8. Black is already in trouble from before he makes this move with the analysis tending to favor white greatly.
I enjoy all of Jerry's videos, but his reflexive use of "unfortunately" becomes rather tedious. He must have used it a dozen times to describe this game alone.
I realize the quibbling nature of this, but there is nothing unfortunate about a knight being trapped on the kingside -- it was a combination of poor planning (or perhaps communication) by the World side and outstanding positional play by Carlsen.
Nothing in chess happens by chance; we get what we deserve every time!
I really enjoy all of Jerry's videos, but his reflexive use of "unfortunately" really becomes tedious. He must have used it a dozen times to describe this game alone. I realize the quibbling nature of this, but there is nothing unfortunate about a knight being trapped on the kingside -- it was a combination of poor planning (or perhaps communication) by the World side and outstanding positional play by Carlsen. Nothing in chess happens by chance; we get what we deserve every time!
how does a GM think? does he read and predict his opponent's move accurately, just like a computer searches every possible way to checkmate? is GM a strong attacker as well as defender? does a good chess player score better in math?
@Berrymore84 if i knew how a GM thinks, i would be a lot better than i am right now. the different about GMs and computers is that computers of course can calculate much better, but GMs (and other good players) dont have to calculate everythink, because they understand the position and computers dont. If a GM is a better attacker or defender really depends on the GM. every player (GMs and other players) have another style to play and other excellences and weaknesses.
@MrMadMungo haha yeah that really makes sense. with years of practices i guess the player can become better but some players gained the title of GM at very young age, i guess this has something to do with their innate talent. my cousin didn't know how to play chess, after i showed him the basic moves he could already beat me in his first game. can i call it unfair? i don't know...
Good job JERRY, whatever things they say, they are just watchers anyway. They don't know how to say "thank you for the upload,people have something to watch"
blacks play is bad, he cant get ....f5 in then why bother playing a kings indian, blacks limited to queenside play , completely wrong white has the queenside play, ...Nc6, ...Ne7 is blacks start of his problems the knight stays there almost the entire game, the old way of ...Nd7 fishers only reply is where the knight should be played, or ...like you said ...a5 ,..Na6,. great video again,
Great analysis, very insightful. It's interesting to see how the complexities of the game of chess get simplified, and yet there is still a lot of depth in the game. Magnus's positional chess style really shines through in this match, and i'm sure in many of his other matches it's visible as well. Good vid.
@8mikomi8 I read your message and had to respond.When ever i see a comment such as this,I makes me think of how dumb can someone be to expect that simply being able to spell would relate to intellect.Hmmmm.Maybe you don't have any your self to make that analysis.Not saying your dumb,don't get me wrong and sorry if i seem rude but maybe you should not make such comments again.Thanx and hav a nise da
I've explained my comment before, and if you fail to understand it that's a flaw on your part and not a silly comment on my part. I was merely stating my own opinion. Many others whose job was the same played with more passion, I did believe and I still do. You may have a different opinion than I, but that does not make my post "silly".
I don't like Carlsen in the sense that he takes chess too seriously. The overall point of the game is still fun, and chess can be art in its own way. I think that he plays without risk and very defensively. I think Mikhail Tal had the right idea. Good video again, though. Thanks Jerry.
How can one dislike this? I dont get it? If you dont like chess videos, dont fucking search for it, and if you do... its impossible to not enjoy. -Great as alwyas Jerry
Jerryyou make great videos but you pronounce too many words wrong and almost every persons name in all your videos. Ohh and the names of the openings. Wtf sooo anboying dude
playing against a committee is a serious disadvantage because the continuity of thought of the single player is unbroken while the concentration of the opposing players is never single-pointed. It's not plentiful ideas that win in chess but concentration.BTW great post, great commentary as always. These videos are a terrific resource, just the right amount of analysis.
@8mikomi8 I am about 100% certain that most of the world would have been using Rybka anyway to check on the three GM's moves, and Carlsen still won. I am confident that a group made up of Carlsen, Kasparov, and Kramnik could beat Houdini.
just can't understand why after black Ke8, whites didn't take the queen? the black queen was protected by this Knight, that was moved....at the minute 9:00
@ChessNetwork It looked like a bad Kings indian , its always the case that black must initiate kingside initiative and concede the queens' side earlier .... whether its a gambit with fxe or Nh5 prefer Na6 Nc6 is a bit dull and uncreative, Kasparov's games playing black are better examples
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
@juNk8assuLproduction be careful who ur talkin to fukin nub.. actually i do know how to write far better than your pathetic mind can imagine, i just don't need to on youtube, mayb b/c i dont care and im relaxing, i know you need to pretend your smart every second of your life because you lack skill anyways, take a look at this game idiot.
@juNk8assuLproduction my grammar is far better than your pathetic mind can imagine.. i just don't need to write properly when im relaxing on youtube you fukin tool... i know u need to pretend your smart every second of your life because in reality your a delusional idiot
Don't agree on this but i'm not so good in chess. but why not take the queen of black instead of moving horse back ? they can't get white queen after it right>?
@deavactus White could have done that instead of Nd2 but of course Black's knight on f6 would then recapture the White queen. So it would simply be a trade. In addition, the Black knight would actually be better positioned on d7, with ideas of coming into c5 with some activity. There is basically no reason for White to make the queen exchange in that situation.
@TheSchaef, which is a very good example of the fact that you're strong when you're alone. The average of the masses can never be better than shit. This demonstrates perfectly what collective intelligence is: shit, fair distribution of shit.
there was no time to really discuss the moves because the organizers wanted the game to play like an otb match. such is life, but this won't go down in the history books like kasparov's vs the world match.
I don't like world games. Everyone is reading the game differently and has a different plan about what to do. World games would work if there's only one right move I suppose but there's a lot.
Hi Jerry, Who is the world No 1. now , Anand or Magnus Carlsen? I thought Anand is the No1. and Do you have any video of Anand Vs Magnus Carlsen? if so please show us. At Last, Whoever is the World No1, I'll always be a Jerry Fan. You are great man.
@laypyuzawwinhtut Go to chessbomb. com there enter and go to nanjing. you can find a couple of Anand/Carlsen games there. Also it is a great place to watch tournaments.
@laypyuzawwinhtut I think Magnus beat Anand in some tourney last week or so and he's back at No. 1 while now there's there players above 2800 right now which is a bit crazy.
@laypyuzawwinhtut I think Magnus is no. 1 again since he beat Anand in a tourney last week or so. I think Magnus came in first in that tourney. But Anand was No. 1 for a short time. Anyway now there are three players in the world above 2800 so the world No. 1 may change hands a lot depending on the play of these people.
Chess is a one on one game, having many people fighting over which moves to make causes black to play without a unified plan. Some of this and a little of that wont do against the best!
You know what guys ... In a book a found this written... "probably in maths class u know if Person A does a work in 1 hr ,B in 2 Hrs and C in 1 then all together they could do the work in 24 mins...... but in actual life it takes 1+2+1=5hrs.
This involves mot only mere maths but also psychology, behavioural sciences, economics, sociology etc."
I guess that's what happened here!!!
I guess Having good Pornstars playing against Magnus would have us won!!!
Absolutely amazing. I loved the video and the commentary. It was great to see various variations that could occur. Keep up making videos of the masters! I would love to see more.
"The world" means just that: "the world" as representatively as possible. It does not mean "Magnus Carlsen vs The 50 top GMs working together". I think the main purpose of these kind of matches is to promote chess to the public (a great cause!) and not to beat Magnus Carlsen
Thanks for the analysis! Honestly, it's good to know the variations that could've been played, but I slept a large portion of the video. Maybe I shouldn't be watching chess videos when I ought to be sleeping?
Its not fair that the world has to pick from the gm's 3 moves...so essentially the "world" is those 3 grandmasters...=/
It should be a open game where the grandmasters can give SUGGESTIONS but anyone can suggest any legal move and the move popular move gets played..OR at least pick 3 moves popular moves of the "world" and let the grandmasters vote from them...otherwise this is meaningless IMO.
@lazimofo90 I agree w/ your observations on this one. From what I gathered, the match should have been titled, "Carlsen vs. Nakamura", not "Carlsen vs. the World".
I'm not sure why Nakamura had so much influence over the other GM's. Granted, he is a blitz-monster, but outside the U.S., well, "the World" never had a prayer.
i like the emphasis on how certain moves can change the structure of the board down the line... positional play can be difficult to see for beginners (like me)
Magnus is the future of chess hes only 19 and and has an ELO of 2826. Thats why Kasporov is working with him, he knows Magnus is going places and he wants credit for it lol.
Hello Judit,Maxime and Hikaru better forget your play with 5...d6? ( correct is for example 5...c6! ) or your play with 7...e5? ( correct is for example 7...Lf5 ) . After this two blunders it would have been better to give up the game. You need not Stockfish or Rybka , what you need is the CODE of chess and you will know what beauty in chess realy is. Have a look at my last three worldrecords and you will perhaps understand . You can find them here on youtube.com under the word :NEWEKLOWSKY
Magnus didnt beat the WORLD, he beats ONLY 3 GM with over 100 elo less than Magnus. Against the WORLD with the normal PC-Hardware and Stockfish 1.8 - or better Rybka-4-Software at home Magnus cant win and he knows this and the WORLD knows that his BOXING-show was only a DECEPTION. He said in this clip : Can YOU beat me
@tantzer The World Champion is the person who performs to a certain high standard in a specific set of tournaments, manages to survive the candidates tournament which determines who gets to challenge the current WC, and wins. This person then becomes the WC. The WC has to periodically defend his title -- as Anand did against Topalov. This system has nothing to do with world ranking at all, which is based on a mathematical method of calculating performance.
The only thing that this game serves is to boost Carlsen's ego. These kind of games will never be won because there is no real plan being played. I much rather see Carlsen play a really strong computer so that he has to struggle.
even so i really like the concept of pitting a top player against 'the world' long may it continue
nopackdrill 4 days ago
a House Divided Against Itself .. the singular figure has the advantage
- who was it said a bad plan's better than none, some old master like Lasker or Tarrasch i can't recall .. you've got 'too many cooks' here, three super GMs w/ distinct styles and ideas, conflicting plans, danger of changing horses in midstream ..
nopackdrill 4 days ago
tic tac toe anyone?
hubbledeepfield77 1 week ago
All nine planets disliked this video.
NicksVideoDiary 1 week ago
at 16:28, why not move the bishop to d4? you pin the pawn, and can force the rook to move, opening up that file.
P1d40n3 3 weeks ago in playlist Analysis of Grandmaster Chess Games
@P1d40n3 he loses the knight, as well as the fact that the white rook on the b file is protecting the pawn.
uthinkingwithportals 1 week ago
Very nice analysis. Unfortunately "The World" would be better with just one GM suggestion, since theoretically, each GM could purse with a move a different strategy from the other two GMs thus shuffling from a 20 move calculus for example. But great game non the less :)
THCronos 4 weeks ago
this is the most perfect game ive ever seen, even better than any bobby fischer´s games, i still think bobby is the best ever, but magnus is really close to that level
lllshokoboylll 1 month ago
Fantastic analysis.
17arkrage 1 month ago
Great analysis.
AchiilezTheOne 1 month ago
At 9:00 minutes. Why doesn't white move to h3 and trap blacks bishop that is protecting blacks queen?
jasonpatrickries 2 months ago
@jasonpatrickries Because the black bishop can just eat the pawn at h3.
alex00h 2 months ago
@jasonpatrickries After bishop takes on h3 bh3, qh3 will come into effect, planting the queen in the white position and weakening it.
Gilsworth 2 months ago in playlist Analysis of Grandmaster Chess Games
very good analysis thanks!!!
h4x7 2 months ago
Knight e7 instead of c6 and then f5. Right? isn't that another way to play?
2tame4fame 2 months ago
Anyone vs the world is full offailure. Carlson has only his opinion on the best moves and tactics. while the world has thegood and bad voting on moves causing nonproductive tactics and bad moves.
kikook222 2 months ago
According to my opening book explorer retreating the knight to e7 is actually better than back to b8. Black is already in trouble from before he makes this move with the analysis tending to favor white greatly.
tobyhoch 2 months ago
why he didn't capture the queen when they moved the knight to e8
arsMSDOS 2 months ago
@arsMSDOS oh sorry I forgot about the bishop at g4
arsMSDOS 2 months ago
Why wont magnus play for the world championship in 2012?
serichejr 3 months ago
I enjoy all of Jerry's videos, but his reflexive use of "unfortunately" becomes rather tedious. He must have used it a dozen times to describe this game alone.
I realize the quibbling nature of this, but there is nothing unfortunate about a knight being trapped on the kingside -- it was a combination of poor planning (or perhaps communication) by the World side and outstanding positional play by Carlsen.
Nothing in chess happens by chance; we get what we deserve every time!
kaewonf8 3 months ago
I really enjoy all of Jerry's videos, but his reflexive use of "unfortunately" really becomes tedious. He must have used it a dozen times to describe this game alone. I realize the quibbling nature of this, but there is nothing unfortunate about a knight being trapped on the kingside -- it was a combination of poor planning (or perhaps communication) by the World side and outstanding positional play by Carlsen. Nothing in chess happens by chance; we get what we deserve every time!
kaewonf8 3 months ago
the world sucks, lol
AwsmUsername 3 months ago
good one! thanks
milchkanne21 3 months ago
Sorry to say this, and it is with all due respect to Magnus's skills, cause god knows he'd destroy me in a game, but......
Magnus : The justin bieber of the chess world
Bobby Fischer : Michael Jackson of the chess world
Hansman381 3 months ago
8:59
Why not take the queen?
RexPetrov 3 months ago
@RexPetrov blacks bishop on g4
pMaher96 3 months ago
Nicely done. I really enjoyed your analysis. Will look for more of your stuff.
388mg 4 months ago
you forgot about the possibility of playing the Grünfeld instead of the kings Indian at the begin, but gj on the video!
TherealChoGath 4 months ago
how does a GM think? does he read and predict his opponent's move accurately, just like a computer searches every possible way to checkmate? is GM a strong attacker as well as defender? does a good chess player score better in math?
Berrymore84 4 months ago
@Berrymore84 if i knew how a GM thinks, i would be a lot better than i am right now. the different about GMs and computers is that computers of course can calculate much better, but GMs (and other good players) dont have to calculate everythink, because they understand the position and computers dont. If a GM is a better attacker or defender really depends on the GM. every player (GMs and other players) have another style to play and other excellences and weaknesses.
MrMadMungo 4 months ago
@MrMadMungo haha yeah that really makes sense. with years of practices i guess the player can become better but some players gained the title of GM at very young age, i guess this has something to do with their innate talent. my cousin didn't know how to play chess, after i showed him the basic moves he could already beat me in his first game. can i call it unfair? i don't know...
Berrymore84 4 months ago
Can anyone tell please what programme is he using?
Kor88Di 5 months ago
what programme does he uses?
Kor88Di 5 months ago
lol! i was voting in this game.. the world was playing it's pieces all over the place. not following book theories and just plain messy.
mutantnaga 5 months ago
he looks like a freakin goat!
wakko380 5 months ago
Awesome video...finally someone explains it throughly.
totalbliss1 5 months ago
at min 15:19 instead of black going king F7, should've went bishop c8:a6 taking the white pawn?
adorianvlad 5 months ago
Good job JERRY, whatever things they say, they are just watchers anyway. They don't know how to say "thank you for the upload,people have something to watch"
(PHILIPPINES)
retsel914 5 months ago
Fun stuff! Thanks for posting!
TheBackyardProfessor 5 months ago
blacks play is bad, he cant get ....f5 in then why bother playing a kings indian, blacks limited to queenside play , completely wrong white has the queenside play, ...Nc6, ...Ne7 is blacks start of his problems the knight stays there almost the entire game, the old way of ...Nd7 fishers only reply is where the knight should be played, or ...like you said ...a5 ,..Na6,. great video again,
MrJbarry007 6 months ago
Great analysis, very insightful. It's interesting to see how the complexities of the game of chess get simplified, and yet there is still a lot of depth in the game. Magnus's positional chess style really shines through in this match, and i'm sure in many of his other matches it's visible as well. Good vid.
jilow 6 months ago 12
@jilow Thanks J-low :)
ChessNetwork 6 months ago 2
@KoRRRRRRRRRRn Learn how to structure your sentences and spell properly before you even think of commenting on anyone's intellect.
8mikomi8 6 months ago
@8mikomi8 I read your message and had to respond.When ever i see a comment such as this,I makes me think of how dumb can someone be to expect that simply being able to spell would relate to intellect.Hmmmm.Maybe you don't have any your self to make that analysis.Not saying your dumb,don't get me wrong and sorry if i seem rude but maybe you should not make such comments again.Thanx and hav a nise da
myrook1 6 months ago
Es imposible que todo el mundo juegue contra un sujeto jajaja. que ridículo título.
IAjedrez123 6 months ago
@drexxar100
I've explained my comment before, and if you fail to understand it that's a flaw on your part and not a silly comment on my part. I was merely stating my own opinion. Many others whose job was the same played with more passion, I did believe and I still do. You may have a different opinion than I, but that does not make my post "silly".
123ggn 7 months ago
good stuff jerry! What's your fide rarting old chap?
chessdemigod 7 months ago
@chessdemigod 22+
ChessNetwork 7 months ago 4
"Too many cooks spoil the broth".
Now you know why the world lost :p
articlescolumn 7 months ago
omg
AddictFender 7 months ago
I don't like Carlsen in the sense that he takes chess too seriously. The overall point of the game is still fun, and chess can be art in its own way. I think that he plays without risk and very defensively. I think Mikhail Tal had the right idea. Good video again, though. Thanks Jerry.
123ggn 7 months ago
@123ggn You have to take it seriously if you're the number one chess player in the world.
moviecritic6 7 months ago
@moviecritic6
Chess still is about fun, playing this way is not the way it's meant to be played, I believe.
123ggn 7 months ago
@123ggn It's the way to play if you do it for a living.
moviecritic6 7 months ago
@moviecritic6
Well that's untrue, there were many great chess players better than he who didn't play that defensively.
123ggn 7 months ago
@123ggn You must not like Vladimir Kramnik
moviecritic6 7 months ago
How can one dislike this? I dont get it? If you dont like chess videos, dont fucking search for it, and if you do... its impossible to not enjoy. -Great as alwyas Jerry
lutzzze 7 months ago
at 9:55 Nc7 was in my opinion a mistake because after f3 Bc7 - Qxd6 White's up a pawn and has a clear advantage
mateklQ 7 months ago
Weak defensive play from both sides. The missed a number of opportunities.
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc i guess you should try to teach the worlds number 1 ranked player how to do it then.
bananosbjarne 5 months ago
The more there people in one team, the more messed up is the play.
TheCabal 9 months ago
ahahahah
TOURNAMENTPOKER 9 months ago
vs world ???
TheNiceCharlotte 10 months ago
Carlsens head looks bigger than the world.
Master8laster 10 months ago
They should have just let the whole world decide with the most popular move.
capricious71 10 months ago
Very nice analysis. Thanks.
corkkyle 10 months ago 10
@corkkyle Thank you. :)
ChessNetwork 10 months ago
nice move, Ne8, it hangs the black queen just a bit:P
imosescu 11 months ago
Jerryyou make great videos but you pronounce too many words wrong and almost every persons name in all your videos. Ohh and the names of the openings. Wtf sooo anboying dude
asdffdsa1212 11 months ago
I find 4. g3 to be really annoying in a KID type of game...
I view it as white admitting he fears black a bit... or that white is too lazy to learn their theory (granted, the KID has immense theory).
Obviously Magnus knows his theory, so it was a bit disappointing to see 4.g3
I guess it just seems kind of passive to me.
One of the main reasons I switched my main line 1.d4 defense to the Benoni.
WeinerschnitzeI 1 year ago
after white's knight moved to b6, why didnt black play Rxb6 followed by fxg3
greatelbow 1 year ago
Does the suggestions from each GM need to be different? Say can they all suggest the same move?
MightyMoe1985 1 year ago
why white play a6 in 15:17? why doesnt black bishop take the pawn?
Djole0 1 year ago
Is "The world" a machine?
Marcello96ITA 1 year ago
@Marcello96ITA nope The world is actually The world (everybody)
antonio8332 1 year ago
@antonio8332 °o°
Marcello96ITA 1 year ago
playing against a committee is a serious disadvantage because the continuity of thought of the single player is unbroken while the concentration of the opposing players is never single-pointed. It's not plentiful ideas that win in chess but concentration.BTW great post, great commentary as always. These videos are a terrific resource, just the right amount of analysis.
leakycauldron1 1 year ago
@leakycauldron1 Agreed. You have a collection of various different minds all trying to coordinate their separate ideas. Must be confusing.
willsmackyoudown 8 months ago
the world fucking sucks!
BlackSN8K 1 year ago
I would enjoy this video much more if the commentator would not pronounce the word "Pawn" as "Pon". Really distracting from the content.
billystratford 1 year ago
@billystratford shut the fuck up!
BlackSN8K 1 year ago
@BlackSN8K Ummmmm ............ No.
billystratford 1 year ago
@billystratford fag.
BlackSN8K 1 year ago
@BlackSN8K Someone needs to learn self control..
moviecritic6 1 year ago
@billystratford And lemme give u a cyber massage while we're at it
tabondjemac 1 year ago
I think if the 3 grandmasters were; Kasparov, Karpov and Deep blue this game would have gone down a hell of a lot differently :P
8mikomi8 1 year ago 36
@8mikomi8 Agreed!
ChessNetwork 1 year ago
@8mikomi8 well you can't really call deep blue a gm, but anand, topalov or fischer would have been good bets too : )
CheapShotFail 10 months ago
@8mikomi8 for your kind information Deep Blue has does not exist anymore..
Gaussdxdydz 9 months ago
@8mikomi8 I am about 100% certain that most of the world would have been using Rybka anyway to check on the three GM's moves, and Carlsen still won. I am confident that a group made up of Carlsen, Kasparov, and Kramnik could beat Houdini.
EpiphoneArchtopLover 7 months ago
@8mikomi8 No because if the world has to choose from three possible moves it will miss the best ones. The "world" just weakens the grandmasters.
viharsarok 5 months ago
@8mikomi8 I'd like to see Karpov, Fischer, and Spassky vs. Carlsen
Lattenkiste 4 months ago
@Lattenkiste
Fisher? he's dead.
TheCosmicphunk 4 months ago
@TheCosmicphunk no shit
Lattenkiste 4 months ago
@Lattenkiste :)))))))
TheCosmicphunk 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
just can't understand why after black Ke8, whites didn't take the queen? the black queen was protected by this Knight, that was moved....at the minute 9:00
sclerotiko 1 year ago
Comment removed
sclerotiko 1 year ago
Comment removed
sclerotiko 1 year ago
Awesome!
ImaPSPcat 1 year ago
How many people are actually voting?
Nilgard 1 year ago
too many cooks
AlanWattParrot 1 year ago
Excellent analysis. Keep up the good work.
2112618 1 year ago
i took part in this game, and i thought it was a bad idea to play this opening against a positional player who seeks to gain space with his pawns
12345jsb1 1 year ago
"...and the world resigned to magnus carlson"
Epic
MrMillsms 1 year ago 47
@junk8assulproduction 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. Bb5 d6 5. h3 Be7
6. d4 O-O 7. d5 Nb4 8. a3 Na6 9. O-O Nc5 10. Re1 a6
11. Ba4 c6 12. Bb3 Nxb3 13. cxb3 h6 14. Nh2 Bd7 15. f4 Qc7 16. Kh1 cxd5 17. exd5 Rfe8 18. Rf1 e4 19. Be3 Bf5 20. g4 Bg6 21. h4 Bf8 22. h5 Bh7 23. g5 hxg5 24. fxg5 Nd7 25. Qg4 Ne5 26. Qg3 Qc8 27. Bf4 Bf5 28. Bxe5 Rxe5 29. g6 fxg6 30. hxg6 Qe8 31. Rg1 Qe7 32. Ng4 Bxg4 33. Qxg4 Qf6 34. Raf1 Qxf1 35. Rxf1 Rae8 36. Qh3 Rh5 37. Qxh5 e3 38. Qh7#
1-0
stfu.. kthx.
warLock21X 1 year ago
warLock21X 1 year ago
hey jerry did u take part in this game...i mean did u vote or something
knife071 1 year ago
@knife071 No, I just reviewed it afterwards.
ChessNetwork 1 year ago
@ChessNetwork It looked like a bad Kings indian , its always the case that black must initiate kingside initiative and concede the queens' side earlier .... whether its a gambit with fxe or Nh5 prefer Na6 Nc6 is a bit dull and uncreative, Kasparov's games playing black are better examples
SuperLazius 1 year ago
magnus noobus
FDGOD74 1 year ago
@FDGOD74 again you mr "God" ?
Go kill yourself to save the world.
juNk8assuLproduction 1 year ago
WOW!
nnaattee9944 1 year ago
Beautiful.. Nice vid.
BillofRightsBrutus 1 year ago
So many stupid comments here!
I thought I was watching a chess video, but after reading some of the comments here I guess I just entered another random youtube video..
btw. great video!
railsback 1 year ago
Hallo Magnus , not only your letter to FIDE in November 2010 shows that you are not any longer the best chessplayer , since November 2010 Viswanthan is also again the chessplayer with the highest rating. Try to beat my worldrecord with mate in 550 here on youtube if you can ... kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
tell carlsen to sign onto ICC and hell lose.
warLock21X 1 year ago
@warLock21X the funny things is that you don't know how to write.
juNk8assuLproduction 1 year ago
@juNk8assuLproduction be careful who ur talkin to fukin nub.. actually i do know how to write far better than your pathetic mind can imagine, i just don't need to on youtube, mayb b/c i dont care and im relaxing, i know you need to pretend your smart every second of your life because you lack skill anyways, take a look at this game idiot.
warLock21X 1 year ago
@warLock21X fail.
juNk8assuLproduction 1 year ago
@juNk8assuLproduction u fail caz ur mom shitted u out.. stfu u u wate of space
warLock21X 1 year ago
@warLock21X caz? learn grammar you piece of shit
juNk8assuLproduction 1 year ago
@juNk8assuLproduction my grammar is far better than your pathetic mind can imagine.. i just don't need to write properly when im relaxing on youtube you fukin tool... i know u need to pretend your smart every second of your life because in reality your a delusional idiot
warLock21X 1 year ago
Don't agree on this but i'm not so good in chess. but why not take the queen of black instead of moving horse back ? they can't get white queen after it right>?
deavactus 1 year ago
@deavactus White could have done that instead of Nd2 but of course Black's knight on f6 would then recapture the White queen. So it would simply be a trade. In addition, the Black knight would actually be better positioned on d7, with ideas of coming into c5 with some activity. There is basically no reason for White to make the queen exchange in that situation.
Chessboy 1 year ago
@TheSchaef, which is a very good example of the fact that you're strong when you're alone. The average of the masses can never be better than shit. This demonstrates perfectly what collective intelligence is: shit, fair distribution of shit.
Vocalallusive 1 year ago
there was no time to really discuss the moves because the organizers wanted the game to play like an otb match. such is life, but this won't go down in the history books like kasparov's vs the world match.
MrZingnigga 1 year ago
wow, the world played a really bad game here.
allowing them to vote on impression is a terrible idea. there should at least be some kind of discussion involved.
imo, the ne7 was the major problem move and magnus just piled more and more pressure after that.
mistletoe88 1 year ago
you are a great expositor
great video, really
Sparks1990 1 year ago
I don't like world games. Everyone is reading the game differently and has a different plan about what to do. World games would work if there's only one right move I suppose but there's a lot.
Kalamouri255 1 year ago
very helpful videos!! you explanition are clear and very smart! it helped me particulary on the opening theories! thanks dude
raoulhery 1 year ago
Hi Jerry, Who is the world No 1. now , Anand or Magnus Carlsen? I thought Anand is the No1. and Do you have any video of Anand Vs Magnus Carlsen? if so please show us. At Last, Whoever is the World No1, I'll always be a Jerry Fan. You are great man.
laypyuzawwinhtut 1 year ago
@laypyuzawwinhtut Go to chessbomb. com there enter and go to nanjing. you can find a couple of Anand/Carlsen games there. Also it is a great place to watch tournaments.
thechessstick 1 year ago
@laypyuzawwinhtut I think Magnus beat Anand in some tourney last week or so and he's back at No. 1 while now there's there players above 2800 right now which is a bit crazy.
Kalamouri255 1 year ago
@laypyuzawwinhtut I think Magnus is no. 1 again since he beat Anand in a tourney last week or so. I think Magnus came in first in that tourney. But Anand was No. 1 for a short time. Anyway now there are three players in the world above 2800 so the world No. 1 may change hands a lot depending on the play of these people.
Kalamouri255 1 year ago
Haha did the world agree on a resign? Or did the grandmasters give the world only the option to do just that.
LiiChinHo 1 year ago
Wait a minute...this is assuming that all three GM's pick three different moves. Why couldn't they just work together and pick just one move??
VitalSigns1 1 year ago
@VitalSigns1 because every move can be a good move, there is a possibility that two GM choose the same move
RudhonThe2nd 1 year ago
Very clear commentary. I struggle with advanced commentary with lots of lines. Thanks for keeping it simple!
MichaelJHuman 1 year ago
god magnus plays like a fucking god
guitarfella581 1 year ago
Chess is a one on one game, having many people fighting over which moves to make causes black to play without a unified plan. Some of this and a little of that wont do against the best!
MDShumboldt 1 year ago
You know what guys ... In a book a found this written... "probably in maths class u know if Person A does a work in 1 hr ,B in 2 Hrs and C in 1 then all together they could do the work in 24 mins...... but in actual life it takes 1+2+1=5hrs.
This involves mot only mere maths but also psychology, behavioural sciences, economics, sociology etc."
I guess that's what happened here!!!
I guess Having good Pornstars playing against Magnus would have us won!!!
lordshifu 1 year ago
The World is pretty fucking Stupid.
austinsemeta 1 year ago
@austinsemeta Actually Magnus should have played with me n my friends we also represent the world as well!!!
lordshifu 1 year ago
I am a KID player and this video is my worst nightmare for black, a slow squeeze from white with no chances whatsoever... :-)
cfw1974 1 year ago
Absolutely amazing. I loved the video and the commentary. It was great to see various variations that could occur. Keep up making videos of the masters! I would love to see more.
youknowit789 1 year ago
fantastic commentary!!
TheKingtut777 1 year ago
Kasparov needed to step in :) He would never have allowed the world team to get in such a pickle. Gary is still the man :)
aniolku25 1 year ago
Magnus is a monster!
lajakl 1 year ago
@lajakl Yeah I wish that upcoming W.C.C. be between Anand and Magnus!!
lordshifu 1 year ago
Outstanding explanation of Magnus' mastery. You are an excellent teacher!
drumcircler 1 year ago
"The world" means just that: "the world" as representatively as possible. It does not mean "Magnus Carlsen vs The 50 top GMs working together". I think the main purpose of these kind of matches is to promote chess to the public (a great cause!) and not to beat Magnus Carlsen
QuakePhil 1 year ago
Thanks for the analysis! Honestly, it's good to know the variations that could've been played, but I slept a large portion of the video. Maybe I shouldn't be watching chess videos when I ought to be sleeping?
VelveetaBoy 1 year ago
Its not fair that the world has to pick from the gm's 3 moves...so essentially the "world" is those 3 grandmasters...=/
It should be a open game where the grandmasters can give SUGGESTIONS but anyone can suggest any legal move and the move popular move gets played..OR at least pick 3 moves popular moves of the "world" and let the grandmasters vote from them...otherwise this is meaningless IMO.
lazimofo90 1 year ago
@lazimofo90 I agree w/ your observations on this one. From what I gathered, the match should have been titled, "Carlsen vs. Nakamura", not "Carlsen vs. the World".
I'm not sure why Nakamura had so much influence over the other GM's. Granted, he is a blitz-monster, but outside the U.S., well, "the World" never had a prayer.
EndridCold 1 year ago
What a wonderful analysis.Even a retard like me can follow your analysis Jerry.Respect man!
gammyhorse 1 year ago
i like the emphasis on how certain moves can change the structure of the board down the line... positional play can be difficult to see for beginners (like me)
Abnormalized 1 year ago
Magnus Carlsen with GM advisors should all them face Rybka 4.
Maximilianovor 1 year ago
Nice analysis man..
i Have played with the world team..
and they play badly againts M.Carlsen..
Tnx for UP
baccwil 1 year ago
Comment removed
xxxIronLeexxx 1 year ago
Magnus is the future of chess hes only 19 and and has an ELO of 2826. Thats why Kasporov is working with him, he knows Magnus is going places and he wants credit for it lol.
LifeMattersChannel 1 year ago
Thanks for the upload!
dannyp136 1 year ago
Great analysis, thanks.
ShotDownInFlames2 1 year ago
Hello Judit,Maxime and Hikaru better forget your play with 5...d6? ( correct is for example 5...c6! ) or your play with 7...e5? ( correct is for example 7...Lf5 ) . After this two blunders it would have been better to give up the game. You need not Stockfish or Rybka , what you need is the CODE of chess and you will know what beauty in chess realy is. Have a look at my last three worldrecords and you will perhaps understand . You can find them here on youtube.com under the word :NEWEKLOWSKY
Moremover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Magnus didnt beat the WORLD, he beats ONLY 3 GM with over 100 elo less than Magnus. Against the WORLD with the normal PC-Hardware and Stockfish 1.8 - or better Rybka-4-Software at home Magnus cant win and he knows this and the WORLD knows that his BOXING-show was only a DECEPTION. He said in this clip : Can YOU beat me
and I say to him now :
Yes WE can
kindly regards from Karlsruhe , Germany
Lutz Neweklowsky
Moremover 1 year ago
Can someone explain to me why the world championship was between Topalov and Anand even though Karlsen is supposed to be better ranked? Thanks.
tantzer 1 year ago
@tantzer The World Champion is the person who performs to a certain high standard in a specific set of tournaments, manages to survive the candidates tournament which determines who gets to challenge the current WC, and wins. This person then becomes the WC. The WC has to periodically defend his title -- as Anand did against Topalov. This system has nothing to do with world ranking at all, which is based on a mathematical method of calculating performance.
xiangyik 1 year ago
@xiangyik Many thanks, that makes sense. Do you happen to know how well Karlsen has done in WC games?
tantzer 1 year ago
OMG ... I am crying ... He makes it all look so easy!!
Fupper16 1 year ago
How come I never hear about these world vs games till it's too late? That game was blown as soon as black brought out the queen's knight.
GoldenJoe 1 year ago
The only thing that this game serves is to boost Carlsen's ego. These kind of games will never be won because there is no real plan being played. I much rather see Carlsen play a really strong computer so that he has to struggle.
ace942 1 year ago
why is magnus carlsen so much more special then other grandchessmaster, does he like have a lot better rating
TheXanthosis 1 year ago