"I guess you guys need some form of ridiculous propaganda..."
Exactly. When people are a fan of something, be it a musical band, or a book and author, or a collection of ideologies as in religion, they will viciously defend it because an attack on something a person loves, feels like an attack on the inner ego, and humans by nature are animals of pride in order to show superiority. Theists can't defend using evidence, so they use weak-analogy fallacies like this
A video made by someone who doesn't actually know what evolution theory is. Read it first, then decide. It's not just about man comes from monkey. Study the DNA evidence, read the findings, then make up your mind. If you don't know about DNA, read about that first.
This video doesn't prove anything. It's just an ignorant interpretation of the evolution theory. A lazy one at that.
Why can't we just agree to disagree? Why must everyone believe or think the same. Free will is an amazing thing so just stop trying to force God upon everyone who chooses to listen to science and data as opposed to being a closed minded person in fear of an intangible being
Wait a minute, didn't tetrapods already have lungs, limbs, and hands before adopting amphibious lives? It's almost like the creator of this clip has no concept of what the theory of evolution is. Oh wait.
Wow. I guess that just explains everything then, doesn't it? Guess I can turn my brain off like the rest of christianity. Thanks for making my ability to think (supposedly god-given, wasn't it) totally useless.
To all people who beleive in evolution let me say this. Your theory states that the big bang happened and created life to put in short form. Now were did the laws in space come from such as the energy to make the bang happen. it just appeared so as long as you cant prove your own dont argue with others. Now wait your most likley thinking he didnt prove to us god exsists. Well god made time and space and the human brain but not human thoughts so why would he be effected by something he made
No it doesn't lol. Show me where you got this info, source it.
Show me exactly where you got the information saying that the big bang theory has anything to do with a theory that talks about the diversity of life.
Big Bang = about the universe expanding from a singularity
Evolution = about the diversity of life and how organisms adapt to their environment
Also, the first law of thermodynamics is not violated by either theory. Matter and energy simply changed from one state of being to another state of being in the big bang, there's never absolute nothing by your definition.
The second law of thermodynamics only works within a closed system, Earth is not a closed system, it receives energy from the sun.
I bet you got this from a creationist site that made you feel smart, yet you don't source your material. "look it up"
@goreth01 Six diffrent types of evolution and without the base of it all-Which is the big bang-Which is a part of evolution and if you dont beleive me look it up-anyway without the base of it being proven it just doesnt make sense and the theories that are so called true are being contradicted by science itself and just to show you look at the first and second law of thermodynamics. They just destroy it all and scientists can find something that never happened-ex.Missing link-not found-wont be..
@boogerboy216 Lets use your criteria for a second. Without proving what made god you can't prove he created the universe or that he even exists. This is because without the base being proven the universe being created just doesn't make sense. Anyway, can you give an example of a relative theory being contradicted? Btw, contradictions are ok to science. Science just corrects itself and continues on searching for more knowledge. This is why science is truth. Does religion ever correct itself?
but why should i believe your text book that says it is also true? isnt it all based on theory as well with little evidence? what are some contradictions in the bible? i would like to discuss this with you if you dont mind
The BIble contradicts itself on every page. There are two separate accounts of creation in Genesis that contradict each other...and we're only 2 or 3 pages in.
Evolution is thoroughly proven. When scientists use the word "Theory" it means "we know beyond a doubt this is true, we just don't know every single fact."
@paintballer7449 I'm sorry, I don't know what you are refering to or what some text book says, whatever it may be, is true. Also, based on your post I'm uncertain if you understand what a "theory" is. Could you explain to me what exactly it is in relation to science, so that we are on the same page?
@boogerboy216 actually, nothing was created in the big-bang, because equal amounts of energy and negative energy were formed, which is equal to nothing, which proves that something could have come from nothing
@boogerboy216 If the theories of science are being contradicted by science where are the scientist, who are theists, saying so by submitting peer-reviewed papers that discard the theories? Can you show EVEN ONE PAPER? Thats all I'm asking here. Again, show everyone one paper from any Christian scientist that even attempts to show science wrong. I double dare you to do this. Put up or shut up, eh? And your thermodynamic arguments are based on the ignorance and/or deceit of others. Papers please.
"no it doesn't it's magic not matter what you want to say, it's a type of magic not science."
Are you saying radiometric dating is not scientific? Do you not believe radioactive decay? Please elaborate and tell us why atoms cannot periodically emit radiation.
"If it works, are you saying MAGIC is what stops it from working?"
I think he's saying radiometric dating is as much beyond his comprehension as magnetism is. In fact, I definitely recall him saying something along the lines of, "Magic everywhere in this bitch, like fuckin' magnets, how do they work? And I don't wanna talk to a scientist I know those mafuckas lyin' and it's getting me pissed"
This is not how evolution works at all! Obviously fish didn't go right from breathing underwater to breathing out of water. In between, there were amphibians.
@orchdork02: Amphibians can already breathe out of water. In between there were fish that could surivive out of water longer than other fish. And as this was beneficial for things like predator avoidance or getting to another body of water over a very short stretch of land, some fish got better and better at surviving on land until some of them could live there (then they got better at lving on land).
After an afternoon youtubing religion, it´s pretty damn clear that the people claiming evolution being false, are the ones who never actually read anything about it. I´ve also learnt that the dinosaurs drowned in a flood 4000 years ago ( I had that wrong before), and that bird feathers are pretty cool.
I am amazed at people in denial. Its a shame we have idiots still among us. You would think that our species would have evolved more intelligence than the depiction of a fish jumping onto an island as the proof that evolution is impossible. Just goes to show that those who are against it could never get a passing grade on a 10 question test regarding evolution.
the first animal on land was called the lungfish for a reason. they were amphibious which obviously meant they could survive on land and water. an aquatic animal doesn't go on land and then become and amphibian. an aquatic animal becomes and amphibian and ten goes on land. its not hard at all to grasp
None of the people commenting on the "stupidity" of this video have actually cared to enlighten us: how - if we really did originate from apes (as if!) - did the fish get out of the water?
Great cartoon! I must admit: the creationist story is much easier to put into a 1 minute video than incremental change over millions of years. Simplicity and ignorance have always the benefit of staying on 1 page ;-)
I think scientists should really make an effort to get better PR. Seems worthwhile because they're holding the path to truth..
@Cat8843 Incrementally and slowly I think, not one species that suddenly hopped on land, but for example evolving marine life getting more slowly (thousand generations) tolerant to atmosperic air in shallow waters where they e.g. could escape from natural predators. Think on longer time scales, read some books on evolution, you'll find some plausible answers. To me, more plausible answers than most religions claim to have.
@confettibrains And why is this? Im asking becouse all I am reading is we dont understand it,and well, I am trying to figure out what it is you understand that we dont? Im not being rude here,but,no one is in the dark of any secret knolege about evalotion that I know about.So I ask you,what is the very thing we dont understand? we all understand how you all say it does not happen instanly,we all can see this.No one here is saying we cant see it.
@confettibrains So,I ask you, what is it, that we dont see in evalotion? A instant change is impossible? becouse if this is the case I can point out many many changes nature does instanly,many if you would like me to explain more? But first I am only asking for your take on why evalotion has to be the way for you? thanks for your time.
What your type doesn't seem to understand is that the DNA molecule is not static. It, like all large organic molecules, is subject to degradation/alteration, and this physical change to the molecular sequence will change the complimentary formation of proteins and where they are directed to throughout the system. Since the DNA molecule is a self-replicating structure, these alterations are reproduced and improved on in the continuation of the organism (thru offspring)
@confettibrains Ok, sounds intersting,really, Now this is what I read, A dna molecule moves around like a living being,its not only a thing that changes and moves it is self replicating=miracle in its self.now here is my question to you? If DNA is a self-replicating structure,then how is it that your dna,only yours is not the same as any one elses=design. You dna is not like any ones elses,not even close.All of our dna is diffrent=miracle.
"its not only a thing that changes and moves it is self replicating=miracle in its self"
No, it's not a miracle, it is simple chemical affinity utilizing the weakness of hydrogen bonding to allow easy separation of the helix so that the exposed nucleotides can ultimately attract (again through chemical affinity) their mirror image on an RNA strand. None of this is miraculous, and in fact, there exists several other molecules that can replicate themselves
@confettibrains Its not simple,and you know it,you say thease things so you can be right with in your thinking,but in all truth,its not simple at all,no life is.Life in genral is a miracle. the human body is a very complex structure that man will never fully understand,But this is what I see,it might not be what you see,we all see things diffrent and no one should hate any one for seeing things diffrent,we all should love one another no matter what it is we see.
@confettibrains Now, I see a very complex structure that to me is a miricle,you see it diffrent,this does not mean you are any better or smarter then me,i UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING YOU DO ABOUT THE MATTER,THERE IS NOTHING YOU KNOW MORE THEN ME IN THE SUBJECT,I JUST SEE IT DIFFRENT THEN YOU IS ALL,And I will never hate you for this nore should any freind ship be killed for the sake of opinions.
"Now, I see a very complex structure that to me is a miricle"
You are of course looking at it after hundreds of millions of years (since the first animals developed) of improvement. If you were to look at life back when it started you would not see it as such a divine creation.
@confettibrains To me there was no million of years of anything,And this is why it is a mirracle to me. I see power in all things and well, mirricles to that power. I like to live my life to belive in life and the power of it. There are many problems with the theroy of evalotion and for me,I cant follow problems.Problem number one=vultures verses dinasours. All dinos are found whole and compleate,none of them with theath marks on them,now this is a big problem,next post please.
@confettibrains You are a lier trying to win a argument that is well,not yours to win,you lie and I will tell you,are not realy good at it,and if you trully belive this? then Im sorry you belive lies and have never steped into any musium. Well I have and you know what they have at all musiums? compleate donos,with no bite marks,none,perfectly clean.All of them.
"compleate donos,with no bite marks,none,perfectly clean.All of them."
LOL they did not come out of the ground that way. The vast majority of "complete" dinosaurs are reconstructions or pieced together with bones taken from other incomplete fossils.
@confettibrains Now when we consider dinos, we think,wow,finding bones of hugh animals that couls have exsisted millions of years ago. But, there is a problem,its called life.in life living with other dinos and other animals when any animal dies,scavengers take the animal and eat it,all of it,bones and all.other animals,tigers,bears,you name it,would have had a feast on all the dinos,leaving no bones.
"in life living with other dinos and other animals when any animal dies,scavengers take the animal and eat it,all of it,bones and all."
No, many animals don't eat bones. Look up how fossilization happens. It is quite a rare occurance for land animals because of scavenging, and thus the best fossils are those of animals who have died and been quickly buried, ie by volcanic ash deposition, landslides, mud pits, swamps, ect. Land animal fossils are very rare
@confettibrains So becouse we know for a fact with in millions of years of well, death, there would be no proof to any dinos,none,becouse all animals eat what is there,dead or notThink about all the dead dinos over the years,thats well, alot of dead food for other animals. but,we find all of dinos compleate,with no signs of any savages at all.Meaning one thing, they all died at the same event at the same time around the world. this,well, is just one problem,I see many many more.
"So becouse we know for a fact with in millions of years of well, death, there would be no proof to any dinos"
^ No idea how fossilization happens. Bone is converted into rock by ion dissociation and then lasts for billions of years
"Meaning one thing, they all died at the same event "
No, dinosaurs lived and died for over 250 million years, but as a whole they all (most) died at one event (the asteroid impacts along with a supervolcanic eruption near siberia)
@confettibrains You have no idea how fossilization happens, there is no such thing as any fossilization,its a freaking lie,and if you belive for a sec,that any bone,human or dino goes through a process of any fossilization=fake made up words to sound smart,you are the fool.No bone is ever converted into rock,How do we know this,science. rock is not made up of the compounds of any living thing,and if you say it is,then we all know who the idots are.
"You have no idea how fossilization happens, there is no such thing as any fossilization"
Ever held a fossilized bone before? They are indeed made of silica, calcium, and whatnot (rock), and are definitely much different than the original bone's composition.
"No bone is ever converted into rock"
Yes it happens. Minerals have ionic charges that displace one another, particularly silica with the phosphorous of bones. This is a very slow process
@confettibrains Last time I ever went to the museum,What I saw and toughed was no rock,not one of the fake made bones there was a rock. Its funny to,becouse museums dont lie,they tell the truth,they hide all the real bones in the cellor and create fake bones to dissplay,we all know this now. So,what are they hiding? real bones,,not rocks,how do I know? I have eyes to,just like every one else,and when they show a real bone,its just that,a real bone,not any rock,dumb dumb.
It's obvious that your religion requires you to deny almost every branch of science. How does it feel to hold on to 2000 year old pre-scientific ways of explaining the world while living in an industrious and post-modern society?
Every bit of technology you use would not exist if religion continued its displacement of science. You can't accept science when it's beneficial to you and then deny other science when it contradicts your primitive views.
@confettibrains Im sorry my friend,this argument is going no where,and you are taking this one little life you have,and are waisiting it trying to convice people who have faith in life into beliveing bones turn into rocks,lol. Sorry,no insult to you,but man,really? men really belive this? that so sad,no insult to you,but to the ones who create lies like this,its,its,well,sad. I have a question,have you ever,in your life,ever touched a real rock bone?
The only thing sad here is that a person does not believe physical evidence, evidence that one can hold, caress, and quantitatively analyze in machines. LOL, fossils don't exist? Do you believe the Earth is the center of the universe too because of how it looks from your narrow perspective?
@confettibrains I ask this becouse there are alot of kids this day that will defend lies to there death with out even touching such a thing ever in there life and I dont want you to be folled into a lie like this unless you want to lie to me and tell me you have,you want to know whay I ask? becouse nothing in real time truth exsists. I dont mean to make you look bad,I am only looking out for you man,I mean,come on.
"there are alot of kids this day that will defend lie"
Prove that fossilization is a lie. You can't. I dare you to go up to any paleontologist, archeologist, geologist, or even a chemist and tell them why fossilization is impossible.
Trust me, the only one who looks bad here is the person who denies the core principles of a dozen scientific fields. All in the name of one ancient book. You're essentially living in an ancient Harry Potter fantasy world.
@confettibrains Harry potter? really? lol, harry potter is from who? witch craft,the devil,the same instatute you come form,full of liers.You all are a bunch of children with imagination like children,then you use thease silly imaginations and say there fact after you say well,it could be this way,like star treke,Im sorry,I dont follow men who follow childish imaginations,I cant,and will not.You belive bone turns into rock,this is well,silly.
"then you use thease silly imaginations and say there fact"
You are talking about religion, right? Because that's entirely what it's based on; the imaginary figments of curious people who tried desperately to find meaning, purpose, and explanations to the physical world and human experience.
@confettibrains And I also say this, most all you kids in this day also do the same to us, you deny God, you say we deny science,no I dont, I love science,it comes from God,But you, you deny God,whats the diffrence? Religion funds most all digs and also belives in science,But we belive the truth,science comes from God,thats the only diffrence from you to me in belife buddy.I belive in real time science,not lies,like bone turning into rock.
You cannot believe in science, while at the same time believe something that is in the complete opposite of science. Religion is not testable, it certainly is not logical, and if you study it you can see parallels and reverberations of characters and stories from previously held ideologies. Religion was the primitive way of explaining the world around us before science came along.
@confettibrains Religion is not opposite of science,this to is a lie you just came up with,and this is also silly and childish.Religion is 100 percent Logical,God is a being,we are beings,how is that not Logicle? How is electricity Logicle? Science explains nothing about nothing on how the world works,all it is are silly imaginations with no proof tp any of it. The days are long gone from real science,now,we follow lies and men who lie for grant money,nothing more.
Religion is based on FAITH alone, unequivocally, and faith is a belief system that is blind, meaning NO evidence is presented. Science is the absolute opposite of blind belief, rather, it is based on facts and data with some logical deductions from such.
@confettibrains Religion is not only based on faith,for some,shure,but for more then you can count,religion is a life style. evalotion is also bassed on faith just the same.evalotion is a bunch of debated unproven ideas,this makes it also a religion. You belive on things that take faith as we do. For many faith is not needed,we belive becouse we know for a fact just as you think you know for a fact,no faith is required.you need to learn more about us before judgment.
@confettibrains As far as anything logicle,by the way,a star trek term,God is more logicle and honest and truthfull then men who are clumsy and lie.I see all of you as liers,why? you do belive in god,But you deny him all the same,all men belive in there heart of hearts,but,they lie and deny becouse they want to live how they want to live.they say,science is 100 percent truth when there is not any proof to it,you follow a diffrent religion and dont even know it.
@QuickBlackFoxx Science proves nothing but what a man wants it to prove,meaning,what man belives it proves is not what it trully proves becouse man is making the out come not the science.If I write any computer program,that program proves nothing of anytihg but what I told it to prove for my self,then after I wirte this programs out come,it proves with out a dought 100 percent proof of the things I wanted it to prove in the first place=my out come,science is the same.
Except that's not true. You clearly have no understanding of science and haven't done any research on it, since, from reading your other comments, you have but ONE argument.
But let's say you're right and science proves nothing, how is your religion any better? Your religion is based around a book written thousands of years ago, how can you say with any certainty that what's written inside it is true? The only real argument you have for that is "I have faith".
@QuickBlackFoxx it is true,all of what i said is true,you say i have never done any research on it,life is reasearch,all life is science dope.every one in the usa has taken science dope,you are not the only selected one to take science in school lol. Science is nothing more then your own out come,this is fact. example? penicillin=not created nore discovered,but grown natrally,has been used for thousands of years before science clamed it.
You obviously failed all the science classes you took.
Penicillin is not "grown naturally," it is a chemical constituent extracted from the penicillium fungi, one of many chemical constituents found in it as a matter of fact.
@confettibrains No,it is the fungi, are to that dumb to belive its not the fungi? do you not know for thousands of years people eat it knowing it would heal them? you well, are dumbed down,lol.
@confettibrains Lier,good buy,have fun with you little crappy life arguing with people on a imaginary board,you need to get a life buddy,and stop using my lords name in vain,would you rather me use your mothers name in vain? dont do it. But i will end it here by saying,YOU ARE A LIE,AND YOU KNOW IT TO.
The life of someone who understands the physical world is actually much more beautiful, inspiring, and fulfilled. You look at life from a narrow and distant perspective, the rest of us extract pleasure from knowing the details. Have fun with your close-minded life.
"would you rather me use your mothers name in vain?"
I don't really give a fuck what you do. Go molest children for all I care. I hear Christians love that shit.
@QuickBlackFoxx My belife comes from God, a real being who created man,this world and the laws of what you call science.this worls and the laws of nature and the unchangable laws of this univerce are the proof,this is all the proof i need,but i will say this.meeting God is also proof,yes,men wrote books,but they also wrote meetings with the lord,they wrote not fables,but there own history.
You example of penicilin is wrong since it was discovered, as discovering something means you find something that was already there before, and penicilin had never been seen or used before then.
Secondly, you didn't answer my question; how do you know that what the bible says is true? Writing about meetings with "God" doesn't make it true, the world around us doesn't make the bible factual at all.
No religion can be any more correct than another. If your religion is true, then so are all the others because they are all based on the same method of belief
@confettibrains Then the same to you,you just admited my religion was correct with in your own thinking,see how inteligent you really are.By denying mine to say your is true,you also admited mine is also correct AT THE SAME TIME SAYING NO RELIGION CAN BE MORE TRUE,LOL.But this is where you are wrong,God is not a religion,I dont follow men with religion any how,I only follow the lord.
Yes, all religions are "true" simply because they exist in literature and people believe them. The correct religion is the one which has the most followers and the one accepted in your particular society. Greek mythology was once as popular s christianity and was a prominent religion at the time, then it became obsolete and later categorized as "mythology" and all creation myths have joined it.
@QuickBlackFoxx Its like saying, I want blue to be pink,so if I do this test blue will indeed be pink,but only becouse I wanted blue to be pink not becouse there is any real science behind it.the out come is always going to be blue turned into pink,becouse you decided the out come.real science lets nature create the out come,and this is impossible with computers and or man made tests.You follow junk science.
"you do belive in god,But you deny him all the same"
No, unlike you I was not indoctrinated with religion at a young age. My parents were both well-educated and secular and saw no need to instill primitive fairytales on me. Religion is a result of intrinsic feeling, likely a result of dopamine/norepinephrine release from the VMAT2 in response, very much similar to the way drugs influence perception and thought patterns
@confettibrains Also my parents where very educated,it does not take a uneducated person to follow our lord lol,this just shows how uneducated you are about my faith is all.If religion was so primitive ,then why does most asll people follow a advanced religion? you also follow a religion of idea that hold no proof so look who is talking.there are more educated people out there in this world that follow God then there are ones who dont,so your whole comment holds no value.
"If religion was so primitive ,then why does most asll people follow a advanced religion?"
Because people are fucking idiots. There is no such thing as an "advanced religion". There is nothing advanced about any religion. They were all written prior to the age of enlightenment.
@confettibrains Its impossible to belive any thing any of you say becouse we know you all are liers,you will lie just to prove a impossibilty,Like,bone turning into stone,this is a lie,but you support it any how,then you call your evelotion 100 percent proof with no proof,you hide the said proof down in your bacements but still say,its 100 percent proof.I will never ever belive in any man,never,you all are liers,you lie,and you have no punishment for it maing oit easy to do.
Have you never held a fossil before? These are physical objects that can be crushed and sputtered through a mass spectrometer. Fossils are undeniably made of silica and other minerals, essentially a completely different mineral composition to bone enough to where it can be called rock
« they hide all the real bones in the cellor and create fake bones to dissplay »
Indeed; the original fossils are only rarely displayed in public. They're mostly kept in stable environments in archives. The majority of objects on display are casts. Not to hide the originals, but to keep them from wear and tear and decay. You can still do the paperwork and obtain permission to study the originals, if you're willing to spend some time and effort on the matter. I'm guessing you don't.
"If DNA is a self-replicating structure,then how is it that your dna,only yours is not the same as any one elses=design"
Because during gamete production, the DNA crossover (taking parts of the mother's and father's DNA) is pretty chaotic, and the total possible combinations of DNA created during this process is in the hundreds of trillions, and since there's only 7 billion people alive it is near impossible for two people to look the same.
@confettibrains This is what I see,we might not see the same way,but this is due to our DNA.So if I belive in God,then its beouse of my creator,he desgined me with in my DNA MAP so I would serve him with in faith.To me,everything with in the body is a miracle,like the brain and eyes.Did you know,its a fact,we dont see with our eyes? we see with our brain=miracle,our eyes only bring in light that our brain shows us whats around us.
"A instant change is impossible? becouse if this is the case I can point out many many changes nature does instanly"
Yes, instant changes are impossible. Life evolves because of changes that are inherited in the primordial cell (the zygote). Evolution is a hand dealt at birth, and the environment dictates if it's a winning one
There exists the ability for organisms to alter gene expression and acquire rapid changes after birth, but these are not inherited long-term
@confettibrains It appears you live up to your name. You're already assuming Evolution is true when you say only bacteria existed. I can provide plenty of evidence that the Earth itself cannot be more than 15,000 years old. I can also provide examples of times Evolution kills people/hurts their health aswell as a few examples of times the Bible's advice would have saved millions of lives. See my website for some of these.
"I can provide plenty of evidence that the Earth itself cannot be more than 15,000 years old."
LOL! Can't argue with someone who doesn't believe in radiometric dating. Radioactive decay is as much of a universal constant as the speed of light is.
"Evolution kills people/hurts their health aswell as a few examples of times the Bible's advice would have saved millions of lives"
How is this possible if evolution isn't true? There's no way DNA can mutate according to you.
But if it could mutate nucleotides that produce harmful effects, then it can also produce nucleotides in locations on the chromsome that code for beneficial mutations.
A book created by a bunch of numb brain idiots who thought that the world was flat and were looking for simple answers?
Or are you going to believe scientific fact? Theres so much proof that the earth is billions of years old. Why cant you see that evolution makes no sense! As i said before you cant say somethings not true unless you understand it!
@MalakaiJ Wait how would the bible have saved lives? The church killed so many inocent people just for thinking differently! Religion destroyed many different interesting cultures, just to spread their damn beliefs! If there was no stupid religions right now we wouldnt be in any wars! There would be almost no problems, infact we would be so much farther today! If you noticed religion was the reason we called mideaval ages the dark ages! Because it held the world back!
"If there was no stupid religions right now we wouldnt be in any wars! There would be almost no problems, infact we would be so much farther today"
Yep. Anthropological evidence shows us there was very little violent conflict before religion and agrarian society came along. Many heinous crimes in history were committed in name of religion
Theists in general hold a lot of anger and prejudice. Most child abusers, alcoholics, and mentally ill folk are followers of religion.
"If you noticed religion was the reason we called mideaval ages the dark ages! Because it held the world back!"
You could take any theistic person and teleport them back in time to the middle ages and they'd fit right in. They really have not advanced much intellectually despite access to 400+ years of scientific knowledge at their fingertips. They might know that disease is caused by microbes rather than God, but beyond that their understanding of reality is just as primitive.
@confettibrains The Dark Ages were because of the prohibition of the Bible that time!!! Get the Facts! In this present "evolved world", is NO MORE LIGHT FROM THE WORD OF GOD, BUT THIS TIME the Bible is available for everyone.... see Dr. Kent Hovind on the web and be honest!
"The Dark Ages were because of the prohibition of the Bible that time"
LOL! Do you really believe that?
"In this present "evolved world", is NO MORE LIGHT FROM THE WORD OF GOD, BUT THIS TIME the Bible is available for everyone"
Religion has become obsolete now more than its ever been in the past. As our knowledge and technology increases, the less we rely on ancient religions to explain what we see around us. More intelligence = less religion.
"if energy can not be created or destroyed, how did it come to be?"
Most scientists agree that all the energy in our universe existed within a singularity and that the big bang did not actually create new material.
What that energy existed as before the singularity could have been many things, such as another universe that had just ended its life in a big crunch (as ours might do) and that this repeats indefinitely in a closed-loop cycle
this is a really good theory, makes a lot of sense.
but it still doesnt explain how matter came to be, even if it was energy from the previous universe, where did it start.
this question is more toward the people who have a hard time grasping God existing before time. if it is hard to beleive God has alway been, how hard it it to believe atoms and matter has always been?
@paintballer7449 If god lives outside of space and time doesn't that technically mean he doesn't exist? I am also curious to know how you think our lack of understanding in something means that there is a god? When we didn't understand what caused lightning didn't we also contribute that to god?
>if it is hard to beleive God has alway been, how hard it it to believe atoms and matter has always been
It isn't hard for me to grasp the concept of eternity. I just don't think it makes rational sense. I see no reason why a universe, whose matter has always existed, requires another object who is also eternal to "create" it (or form it in shape).
God is used to replace our lack of understanding & has been for 1000s of years to explain disease/earth/space
"but it still doesnt explain how matter came to be"
It probably didnt "come to be" but rather is a fundamental attribute of reality that goes hand in hand with spacetime, dark energy, the force carriers (whatever those may be). And I suggest this because quantum entanglement shows all the particles of energy in the universe are entangled with one another. They can affect one another half way across the cosmos, as if their intrinsic properties bypass spacetime
@confettibrains Actually it was the christians that held everyone back. The Jews new about good higiene and they suffered the least from the bubbonic plague... Before that there were all sorts of polytheistic peoples who know that the earth was round; built large megalithic structures, performed dental and brain suregery, as well as had detailed mappings of the stars...
@confettibrains Im a theist, bordering on atheist, and I dont take kindly to being referred to as having the intelligence of a middle ages human. You simply dont understand the leaps and bound science has made
You don't take kindly? I'm sorry the truth hurts. (If it wasn't true, then you would not be offended)
It is a fact that holding on to the middle age's worldviews makes you a person whose on an equivalent level of intelligence. It is you who simply does not understand the leaps and bounds science has made if you still cling to a 2,000 year-old way of explaining the physical world.
@confettibrains What the hell are you talking about? The truth hurts? Im clinging to a 2,000 year old way of explaining the physical world? At what point did you think I was stuck in the middle ages?
The reason I border on atheism is due to what ive been learning through the modern education system. I fail to understand how what I wrote could possibly be misread.
Any western theist must learn from age 5, and what they learn at age 10 far exceeds the knowledge of medieval man.
"I fail to understand how what I wrote could possibly be misread."
You fail to understand how denying some laws of physics, chemical, archeological, paleontological, and geological science (which, by the way, are all empirical. That's why they are SCIENCE) could indicate you as holding onto a primitive worldview? I'm sorry, but it certainly does. There is no logical basis for denying fossilization, the formation of mountains, radioactive decay, evolution, ect.
Sorry, didn't realize you believed evolution. Well then, you certainly cannot align yourself with any mainstream religion because science contradicts every single story of creation throughout these religious ideologies.
@chaincells I actually like the animation style, however ridiculous and pernicious the content. Too bad it was misused for the further dumbening of the incurious.
Here's another fantastic celebration of ignorance. Stupidity is so funny. Let's all deny the mountains of convergent evidence for evolution, and never ever question the perfect wisdom of illiterate Iron Age tribesmen from the Middle East.
@SalamaSond Let's all act like there's plenty of evidence for a theory that has been debunked years ago and attempt to make a mockery of a God, which wasn't even mentioned in the video, proving a point. Evolution blocks all attempts to question it. If it was so heavily proven Evolutionists would have no problem humiliating Creationists, but they never accept the chance to do it anywhere.
@MalakaiJ It's only through the starkest of willful ignorance that you can make such a statement. Evolution does not "block all attempts to question it" ...you're thinking of "faith". The fact is, every time we've put evolution to the test, it works. The only reason creationists aren't humilated is that they're insanely arrogant. You're being lied to: do yourself a favor, spare yourself further embarassment, get some real information from people who study this stuff.
@SalamaSond Then why are so many scientists fired when they even hint at intelligent design? Watch "Expelled no intelligence allowed" for examples. Then tell me Evolution doesn't block all attempts to question it. I know a scientist who is INCREDIBLY well qualified, and he's terrified to even publically reveal his name in case he gets fired. I've seen the evidence. I used to believe the lie until I switched my brain on.
@MalakaiJ Look, this doesn't need to be a hostile exchange. You're engaged in something called "confirmation bias", wherein you're giving credence to what you WANT to believe. That's something the scientific method is good at eliminating. ID is not a theory, and it can never be, because it makes no testable claims. Evolution makes testable claims that have worked every time. "Expelled" is a perfect example of how far YEC will go, how dishonest they'll be, to avoid facing facts.
@SalamaSond I could so easily turn confirmation bias around on you. You want to believe in Evolution, or you were indoctrinated early on and just don't want to change that belief, so you loof for evidence for it. The difference is I once believed in Evolution and my "science" teacher made a statement which made me question the theory. So I did some research, and I found Evolution to be pseudo-science and converted. What is so dishonest about Expelled? It exposes dishonesty, not creates it.
@MalakaiJ Actually you can't turn confirmation bias around on me. See, I started with the same belief that you did: God did it all. The differernce is that when I was shown uncomfortable evidence, I didn't reject it, I checked into its credibilty. I came to a conclusion about what is true by finding the most credible and consistant sources. The trick is to start with the evidence and see what the evidence says. It's too easy to find misleading information to back up what you already believe.
Please, tell me why nucleotides cannot change position on the DNA strand. Do you believe the DNA molecule is static and unable to change, even though all other organic molecules are subject to such changes? Do you distinguish the nucleotides that make the lactose tolerance gene, from the nucleotides that make other morphological evolutionary changes?
Do you draw borders between small life made of cells containing genes, from animals made of many small cells also with genes?
@SalamaSond P.S. if you got hostility from that I apologise. I do not intend any hostility. However when you said it is only through the starkest of willful ignorance I did detect some hostility in that. I find it rather funny when Evolutionists will instead attack the character or their opponants and their sources rather than providing real evidence. Calling me biased does not make me any more or less right, and it is only true to the extent that I am human.
"I find it rather funny when Evolutionists will instead attack the character or their opponants and their sources rather than providing real evidence"
Because, when dealing with someone of faith, there is no need to produce evidence. Faith is defined as blind belief so there is no amount of contradicting evidence that would change their faith in ancient religious doctrine
It doesn't really do good to insult them, but it sure is a lot more fun than trying to teach them biology
Now tell me, how do u really see or understand evolution?
teddycn47 1 week ago
What you showed was not evolution and does not disprove it. You attempted to show failure of adaptation. Evolution is about the survivors however.
gocrazy432 3 weeks ago
Get a clue...
FreeFromWar 3 weeks ago
That's not how it happened but, whatever. I guess you guys need some form of ridiculous propaganda to make yourselves sleep well at night.
SGTSlashRazor 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SGTSlashRazor
"I guess you guys need some form of ridiculous propaganda..."
Exactly. When people are a fan of something, be it a musical band, or a book and author, or a collection of ideologies as in religion, they will viciously defend it because an attack on something a person loves, feels like an attack on the inner ego, and humans by nature are animals of pride in order to show superiority. Theists can't defend using evidence, so they use weak-analogy fallacies like this
confettibrains 3 weeks ago
troll?
KollaDudurin 1 month ago
Cute little cartoon, but how exactly does this disprove evolution?
ZombieFood69 1 month ago
A video made by someone who doesn't actually know what evolution theory is. Read it first, then decide. It's not just about man comes from monkey. Study the DNA evidence, read the findings, then make up your mind. If you don't know about DNA, read about that first.
This video doesn't prove anything. It's just an ignorant interpretation of the evolution theory. A lazy one at that.
kerayzey 1 month ago
mud skippers, lung fish, walking catfish,,,,ignorance is possible
masluxx 1 month ago
Why can't we just agree to disagree? Why must everyone believe or think the same. Free will is an amazing thing so just stop trying to force God upon everyone who chooses to listen to science and data as opposed to being a closed minded person in fear of an intangible being
obiwankehannah 1 month ago
What...did...I...just..watch..
UpgradedWorld 1 month ago
I do not get it.
91honan 1 month ago
I bet a two year old could beat that argument on these video !!!
kibaworg 1 month ago
Wait a minute, didn't tetrapods already have lungs, limbs, and hands before adopting amphibious lives? It's almost like the creator of this clip has no concept of what the theory of evolution is. Oh wait.
Linazazel 1 month ago
Wow. I guess that just explains everything then, doesn't it? Guess I can turn my brain off like the rest of christianity. Thanks for making my ability to think (supposedly god-given, wasn't it) totally useless.
silverbanshee0 1 month ago
So one made-up, animated story starring a cartoon fish is proof of ANOTHER made-up myth starring invisible deities? How's that work?
GodsTalkingSnake 1 month ago
To all people who beleive in evolution let me say this. Your theory states that the big bang happened and created life to put in short form. Now were did the laws in space come from such as the energy to make the bang happen. it just appeared so as long as you cant prove your own dont argue with others. Now wait your most likley thinking he didnt prove to us god exsists. Well god made time and space and the human brain but not human thoughts so why would he be effected by something he made
boogerboy216 1 month ago
@boogerboy216
"Your theory states that the big bang happened"
No it doesn't
argument refuted
WitchHunter93 1 month ago
@WitchHunter93 Yes it does. Why not research and find out what refuted means before you use it in a sentence
boogerboy216 1 month ago
@boogerboy216
No it doesn't lol. Show me where you got this info, source it.
Show me exactly where you got the information saying that the big bang theory has anything to do with a theory that talks about the diversity of life.
Big Bang = about the universe expanding from a singularity
Evolution = about the diversity of life and how organisms adapt to their environment
Two entirely separate theories.
Show me where you're getting your sources.
WitchHunter93 1 month ago
@boogerboy216
Also, the first law of thermodynamics is not violated by either theory. Matter and energy simply changed from one state of being to another state of being in the big bang, there's never absolute nothing by your definition.
The second law of thermodynamics only works within a closed system, Earth is not a closed system, it receives energy from the sun.
I bet you got this from a creationist site that made you feel smart, yet you don't source your material. "look it up"
WitchHunter93 1 month ago
@boogerboy216: Evolution states absolutely nothing about the big bang.
It's entirely about life and how it changes.
As for where the laws of physics come from.
We do not know. Yet. Scientist are working on it.
And no we don't have to prove everything to be allowed to argue for the things we have proven.
Especially when the alternatives have no proof at all going for them.
goreth01 1 month ago
@goreth01 Six diffrent types of evolution and without the base of it all-Which is the big bang-Which is a part of evolution and if you dont beleive me look it up-anyway without the base of it being proven it just doesnt make sense and the theories that are so called true are being contradicted by science itself and just to show you look at the first and second law of thermodynamics. They just destroy it all and scientists can find something that never happened-ex.Missing link-not found-wont be..
boogerboy216 1 month ago
@boogerboy216 Lets use your criteria for a second. Without proving what made god you can't prove he created the universe or that he even exists. This is because without the base being proven the universe being created just doesn't make sense. Anyway, can you give an example of a relative theory being contradicted? Btw, contradictions are ok to science. Science just corrects itself and continues on searching for more knowledge. This is why science is truth. Does religion ever correct itself?
thybigballs 1 month ago
@thybigballs
God genisis 1...
but why should i believe your text book that says it is also true? isnt it all based on theory as well with little evidence? what are some contradictions in the bible? i would like to discuss this with you if you dont mind
paintballer7449 1 month ago
@paintballer7449
The BIble contradicts itself on every page. There are two separate accounts of creation in Genesis that contradict each other...and we're only 2 or 3 pages in.
Evolution is thoroughly proven. When scientists use the word "Theory" it means "we know beyond a doubt this is true, we just don't know every single fact."
ktrfeb23 1 month ago
@paintballer7449 I'm sorry, I don't know what you are refering to or what some text book says, whatever it may be, is true. Also, based on your post I'm uncertain if you understand what a "theory" is. Could you explain to me what exactly it is in relation to science, so that we are on the same page?
thybigballs 1 month ago
@boogerboy216 actually, nothing was created in the big-bang, because equal amounts of energy and negative energy were formed, which is equal to nothing, which proves that something could have come from nothing
randomguy7890 1 month ago
@boogerboy216 If the theories of science are being contradicted by science where are the scientist, who are theists, saying so by submitting peer-reviewed papers that discard the theories? Can you show EVEN ONE PAPER? Thats all I'm asking here. Again, show everyone one paper from any Christian scientist that even attempts to show science wrong. I double dare you to do this. Put up or shut up, eh? And your thermodynamic arguments are based on the ignorance and/or deceit of others. Papers please.
thybigballs 1 month ago
@boogerboy216 LOL what does big bang and evolution have to do with each other???
TheBloodyBlackJackal 1 month ago
@michiyoyoshiku It's called radiometric dating. And it works whether you believe it or not.
anticorncob6 1 month ago
@anticorncob6
no it doesn't it's magic not matter what you want to say, it's a type of magic not science. Magic is an illusion
michiyoyoshiku 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@michiyoyoshiku
"no it doesn't it's magic not matter what you want to say, it's a type of magic not science."
Are you saying radiometric dating is not scientific? Do you not believe radioactive decay? Please elaborate and tell us why atoms cannot periodically emit radiation.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@michiyoyoshiku Can you explain to me how radiometric dating is MAGIC? If it works, are you saying MAGIC is what stops it from working?
anticorncob6 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@anticorncob6
"If it works, are you saying MAGIC is what stops it from working?"
I think he's saying radiometric dating is as much beyond his comprehension as magnetism is. In fact, I definitely recall him saying something along the lines of, "Magic everywhere in this bitch, like fuckin' magnets, how do they work? And I don't wanna talk to a scientist I know those mafuckas lyin' and it's getting me pissed"
confettibrains 1 month ago
@anticorncob6 its been proved wrong
boogerboy216 1 month ago
@boogerboy216 No it hasn't. If you were right, the vast majority of scientists would not accept it. Every "test" that disproved it has been debunked.
anticorncob6 1 month ago
@CarloOnU2ube why not?
taodragon24 1 month ago
This is not how evolution works at all! Obviously fish didn't go right from breathing underwater to breathing out of water. In between, there were amphibians.
orchdork02 1 month ago
@orchdork02: Amphibians can already breathe out of water. In between there were fish that could surivive out of water longer than other fish. And as this was beneficial for things like predator avoidance or getting to another body of water over a very short stretch of land, some fish got better and better at surviving on land until some of them could live there (then they got better at lving on land).
goreth01 1 month ago
After an afternoon youtubing religion, it´s pretty damn clear that the people claiming evolution being false, are the ones who never actually read anything about it. I´ve also learnt that the dinosaurs drowned in a flood 4000 years ago ( I had that wrong before), and that bird feathers are pretty cool.
captainpersson 1 month ago
Why is it always FISH with you people??? "My big Jesus fish can eat your Darwin fish, blah blah.." Man, I am up to here with jeebusheads.
mikey11147 1 month ago
I am amazed at people in denial. Its a shame we have idiots still among us. You would think that our species would have evolved more intelligence than the depiction of a fish jumping onto an island as the proof that evolution is impossible. Just goes to show that those who are against it could never get a passing grade on a 10 question test regarding evolution.
spcbell3246 2 months ago
fuck all religion. ill just live a good life and if there is a god and i go to hell, wateva wateva
willblackedout 2 months ago
magikarp uses "doesn't know how to evolve"
Its not very effective
PinkotAnim 2 months ago
the first animal on land was called the lungfish for a reason. they were amphibious which obviously meant they could survive on land and water. an aquatic animal doesn't go on land and then become and amphibian. an aquatic animal becomes and amphibian and ten goes on land. its not hard at all to grasp
PinkotAnim 2 months ago
too early to evolve in gyaridos
cipihevent 2 months ago
impossible is a magic man in the sky that created itself
teleshaka 2 months ago
None of the people commenting on the "stupidity" of this video have actually cared to enlighten us: how - if we really did originate from apes (as if!) - did the fish get out of the water?
Cat8843 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Cat8843 how - if we really did originate from apes (as if!) - did the fish get out of the water?
We have TODAY fishes that live on land and water, boy that question is stoopid !
MrRichardQED 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
damm, i don't have an argument, i know, i'll make an animation, no one will notice
sebastian1313 2 months ago
How is the fish breathing....I don't believe in evolution
Bahablue4 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't trust this guy, he clearly has only ever read one book.
TheSchnorkey 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheSchnorkey 2 months ago
Not sure if troll
FrozenPetrolPie 2 months ago
Great cartoon! I must admit: the creationist story is much easier to put into a 1 minute video than incremental change over millions of years. Simplicity and ignorance have always the benefit of staying on 1 page ;-)
I think scientists should really make an effort to get better PR. Seems worthwhile because they're holding the path to truth..
njroode 2 months ago 2
@njroode Then how did the fish get out of the water?
Cat8843 2 months ago
@Cat8843 Incrementally and slowly I think, not one species that suddenly hopped on land, but for example evolving marine life getting more slowly (thousand generations) tolerant to atmosperic air in shallow waters where they e.g. could escape from natural predators. Think on longer time scales, read some books on evolution, you'll find some plausible answers. To me, more plausible answers than most religions claim to have.
njroode 2 months ago
The fish must be a Creationist, he doesn't understand how evolution works either.
AtheistExplains 2 months ago 53
@AtheistExplains The atheist must be a fish because he doesn't understand how evolution works
pimpedpope 1 month ago
@pimpedpope how do you know? Because this video clearly demonstrates that the author doesn't understand how evolution works.
Pirate44444 1 month ago
@AtheistExplains how does it work?
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
It does not happen instantly by will-power. Only a creationist would not understand that.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains And why is this? Im asking becouse all I am reading is we dont understand it,and well, I am trying to figure out what it is you understand that we dont? Im not being rude here,but,no one is in the dark of any secret knolege about evalotion that I know about.So I ask you,what is the very thing we dont understand? we all understand how you all say it does not happen instanly,we all can see this.No one here is saying we cant see it.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@confettibrains So,I ask you, what is it, that we dont see in evalotion? A instant change is impossible? becouse if this is the case I can point out many many changes nature does instanly,many if you would like me to explain more? But first I am only asking for your take on why evalotion has to be the way for you? thanks for your time.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
What your type doesn't seem to understand is that the DNA molecule is not static. It, like all large organic molecules, is subject to degradation/alteration, and this physical change to the molecular sequence will change the complimentary formation of proteins and where they are directed to throughout the system. Since the DNA molecule is a self-replicating structure, these alterations are reproduced and improved on in the continuation of the organism (thru offspring)
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Ok, sounds intersting,really, Now this is what I read, A dna molecule moves around like a living being,its not only a thing that changes and moves it is self replicating=miracle in its self.now here is my question to you? If DNA is a self-replicating structure,then how is it that your dna,only yours is not the same as any one elses=design. You dna is not like any ones elses,not even close.All of our dna is diffrent=miracle.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"its not only a thing that changes and moves it is self replicating=miracle in its self"
No, it's not a miracle, it is simple chemical affinity utilizing the weakness of hydrogen bonding to allow easy separation of the helix so that the exposed nucleotides can ultimately attract (again through chemical affinity) their mirror image on an RNA strand. None of this is miraculous, and in fact, there exists several other molecules that can replicate themselves
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Its not simple,and you know it,you say thease things so you can be right with in your thinking,but in all truth,its not simple at all,no life is.Life in genral is a miracle. the human body is a very complex structure that man will never fully understand,But this is what I see,it might not be what you see,we all see things diffrent and no one should hate any one for seeing things diffrent,we all should love one another no matter what it is we see.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@confettibrains Now, I see a very complex structure that to me is a miricle,you see it diffrent,this does not mean you are any better or smarter then me,i UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING YOU DO ABOUT THE MATTER,THERE IS NOTHING YOU KNOW MORE THEN ME IN THE SUBJECT,I JUST SEE IT DIFFRENT THEN YOU IS ALL,And I will never hate you for this nore should any freind ship be killed for the sake of opinions.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"Now, I see a very complex structure that to me is a miricle"
You are of course looking at it after hundreds of millions of years (since the first animals developed) of improvement. If you were to look at life back when it started you would not see it as such a divine creation.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains To me there was no million of years of anything,And this is why it is a mirracle to me. I see power in all things and well, mirricles to that power. I like to live my life to belive in life and the power of it. There are many problems with the theroy of evalotion and for me,I cant follow problems.Problem number one=vultures verses dinasours. All dinos are found whole and compleate,none of them with theath marks on them,now this is a big problem,next post please.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"To me there was no million of years of anything"
So you're one of those people who deny the law of radioactivity?
Ok, you're an idiot.
"All dinos are found whole and compleate"
LOL more proof that you are an idiot. VERY few dinosaurs are found complete, and MANY have teeth marks on their bones.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains You are a lier trying to win a argument that is well,not yours to win,you lie and I will tell you,are not realy good at it,and if you trully belive this? then Im sorry you belive lies and have never steped into any musium. Well I have and you know what they have at all musiums? compleate donos,with no bite marks,none,perfectly clean.All of them.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"compleate donos,with no bite marks,none,perfectly clean.All of them."
LOL they did not come out of the ground that way. The vast majority of "complete" dinosaurs are reconstructions or pieced together with bones taken from other incomplete fossils.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Now when we consider dinos, we think,wow,finding bones of hugh animals that couls have exsisted millions of years ago. But, there is a problem,its called life.in life living with other dinos and other animals when any animal dies,scavengers take the animal and eat it,all of it,bones and all.other animals,tigers,bears,you name it,would have had a feast on all the dinos,leaving no bones.
mystic81006 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mystic81006
"in life living with other dinos and other animals when any animal dies,scavengers take the animal and eat it,all of it,bones and all."
No, many animals don't eat bones. Look up how fossilization happens. It is quite a rare occurance for land animals because of scavenging, and thus the best fossils are those of animals who have died and been quickly buried, ie by volcanic ash deposition, landslides, mud pits, swamps, ect. Land animal fossils are very rare
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains So becouse we know for a fact with in millions of years of well, death, there would be no proof to any dinos,none,becouse all animals eat what is there,dead or notThink about all the dead dinos over the years,thats well, alot of dead food for other animals. but,we find all of dinos compleate,with no signs of any savages at all.Meaning one thing, they all died at the same event at the same time around the world. this,well, is just one problem,I see many many more.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"So becouse we know for a fact with in millions of years of well, death, there would be no proof to any dinos"
^ No idea how fossilization happens. Bone is converted into rock by ion dissociation and then lasts for billions of years
"Meaning one thing, they all died at the same event "
No, dinosaurs lived and died for over 250 million years, but as a whole they all (most) died at one event (the asteroid impacts along with a supervolcanic eruption near siberia)
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains You have no idea how fossilization happens, there is no such thing as any fossilization,its a freaking lie,and if you belive for a sec,that any bone,human or dino goes through a process of any fossilization=fake made up words to sound smart,you are the fool.No bone is ever converted into rock,How do we know this,science. rock is not made up of the compounds of any living thing,and if you say it is,then we all know who the idots are.
mystic81006 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mystic81006
"You have no idea how fossilization happens, there is no such thing as any fossilization"
Ever held a fossilized bone before? They are indeed made of silica, calcium, and whatnot (rock), and are definitely much different than the original bone's composition.
"No bone is ever converted into rock"
Yes it happens. Minerals have ionic charges that displace one another, particularly silica with the phosphorous of bones. This is a very slow process
confettibrains 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
« its a freaking lie »
No, it's permineralisation, and we know very well how it works.
MrGralgrathor 1 month ago
@confettibrains Last time I ever went to the museum,What I saw and toughed was no rock,not one of the fake made bones there was a rock. Its funny to,becouse museums dont lie,they tell the truth,they hide all the real bones in the cellor and create fake bones to dissplay,we all know this now. So,what are they hiding? real bones,,not rocks,how do I know? I have eyes to,just like every one else,and when they show a real bone,its just that,a real bone,not any rock,dumb dumb.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
It's obvious that your religion requires you to deny almost every branch of science. How does it feel to hold on to 2000 year old pre-scientific ways of explaining the world while living in an industrious and post-modern society?
Every bit of technology you use would not exist if religion continued its displacement of science. You can't accept science when it's beneficial to you and then deny other science when it contradicts your primitive views.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Im sorry my friend,this argument is going no where,and you are taking this one little life you have,and are waisiting it trying to convice people who have faith in life into beliveing bones turn into rocks,lol. Sorry,no insult to you,but man,really? men really belive this? that so sad,no insult to you,but to the ones who create lies like this,its,its,well,sad. I have a question,have you ever,in your life,ever touched a real rock bone?
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
The only thing sad here is that a person does not believe physical evidence, evidence that one can hold, caress, and quantitatively analyze in machines. LOL, fossils don't exist? Do you believe the Earth is the center of the universe too because of how it looks from your narrow perspective?
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains I ask this becouse there are alot of kids this day that will defend lies to there death with out even touching such a thing ever in there life and I dont want you to be folled into a lie like this unless you want to lie to me and tell me you have,you want to know whay I ask? becouse nothing in real time truth exsists. I dont mean to make you look bad,I am only looking out for you man,I mean,come on.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"there are alot of kids this day that will defend lie"
Prove that fossilization is a lie. You can't. I dare you to go up to any paleontologist, archeologist, geologist, or even a chemist and tell them why fossilization is impossible.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"I dont mean to make you look bad"
Trust me, the only one who looks bad here is the person who denies the core principles of a dozen scientific fields. All in the name of one ancient book. You're essentially living in an ancient Harry Potter fantasy world.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Harry potter? really? lol, harry potter is from who? witch craft,the devil,the same instatute you come form,full of liers.You all are a bunch of children with imagination like children,then you use thease silly imaginations and say there fact after you say well,it could be this way,like star treke,Im sorry,I dont follow men who follow childish imaginations,I cant,and will not.You belive bone turns into rock,this is well,silly.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"then you use thease silly imaginations and say there fact"
You are talking about religion, right? Because that's entirely what it's based on; the imaginary figments of curious people who tried desperately to find meaning, purpose, and explanations to the physical world and human experience.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains And I also say this, most all you kids in this day also do the same to us, you deny God, you say we deny science,no I dont, I love science,it comes from God,But you, you deny God,whats the diffrence? Religion funds most all digs and also belives in science,But we belive the truth,science comes from God,thats the only diffrence from you to me in belife buddy.I belive in real time science,not lies,like bone turning into rock.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"you deny God, you say we deny science,no I dont"
You cannot believe in science, while at the same time believe something that is in the complete opposite of science. Religion is not testable, it certainly is not logical, and if you study it you can see parallels and reverberations of characters and stories from previously held ideologies. Religion was the primitive way of explaining the world around us before science came along.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Religion is not opposite of science,this to is a lie you just came up with,and this is also silly and childish.Religion is 100 percent Logical,God is a being,we are beings,how is that not Logicle? How is electricity Logicle? Science explains nothing about nothing on how the world works,all it is are silly imaginations with no proof tp any of it. The days are long gone from real science,now,we follow lies and men who lie for grant money,nothing more.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"Religion is not opposite of science"
Religion is based on FAITH alone, unequivocally, and faith is a belief system that is blind, meaning NO evidence is presented. Science is the absolute opposite of blind belief, rather, it is based on facts and data with some logical deductions from such.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Religion is not only based on faith,for some,shure,but for more then you can count,religion is a life style. evalotion is also bassed on faith just the same.evalotion is a bunch of debated unproven ideas,this makes it also a religion. You belive on things that take faith as we do. For many faith is not needed,we belive becouse we know for a fact just as you think you know for a fact,no faith is required.you need to learn more about us before judgment.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@confettibrains As far as anything logicle,by the way,a star trek term,God is more logicle and honest and truthfull then men who are clumsy and lie.I see all of you as liers,why? you do belive in god,But you deny him all the same,all men belive in there heart of hearts,but,they lie and deny becouse they want to live how they want to live.they say,science is 100 percent truth when there is not any proof to it,you follow a diffrent religion and dont even know it.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
Except science has proof of why things happen the way they do, all you have is a book and your faith.
QuickBlackFoxx 1 month ago
@QuickBlackFoxx Science proves nothing but what a man wants it to prove,meaning,what man belives it proves is not what it trully proves becouse man is making the out come not the science.If I write any computer program,that program proves nothing of anytihg but what I told it to prove for my self,then after I wirte this programs out come,it proves with out a dought 100 percent proof of the things I wanted it to prove in the first place=my out come,science is the same.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
Except that's not true. You clearly have no understanding of science and haven't done any research on it, since, from reading your other comments, you have but ONE argument.
But let's say you're right and science proves nothing, how is your religion any better? Your religion is based around a book written thousands of years ago, how can you say with any certainty that what's written inside it is true? The only real argument you have for that is "I have faith".
QuickBlackFoxx 1 month ago
@QuickBlackFoxx it is true,all of what i said is true,you say i have never done any research on it,life is reasearch,all life is science dope.every one in the usa has taken science dope,you are not the only selected one to take science in school lol. Science is nothing more then your own out come,this is fact. example? penicillin=not created nore discovered,but grown natrally,has been used for thousands of years before science clamed it.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
You obviously failed all the science classes you took.
Penicillin is not "grown naturally," it is a chemical constituent extracted from the penicillium fungi, one of many chemical constituents found in it as a matter of fact.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains No,it is the fungi, are to that dumb to belive its not the fungi? do you not know for thousands of years people eat it knowing it would heal them? you well, are dumbed down,lol.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
Penicillin is a goddamn chemical constituent of the penicilliUM fungi. That's okay though, I don't expect you to know a damn thing.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains
damn you, now he's not replying to me with anymore! ):
QuickBlackFoxx 1 month ago
@QuickBlackFoxx
I'm pretty much done. There's not a whole lot you can say to a person like that who lives by a 2,000 year old fantasy novel.
confettibrains 1 month ago 6
@confettibrains Lier,good buy,have fun with you little crappy life arguing with people on a imaginary board,you need to get a life buddy,and stop using my lords name in vain,would you rather me use your mothers name in vain? dont do it. But i will end it here by saying,YOU ARE A LIE,AND YOU KNOW IT TO.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
You were arguing too, to be fair.
QuickBlackFoxx 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"have fun with you little crappy life"
The life of someone who understands the physical world is actually much more beautiful, inspiring, and fulfilled. You look at life from a narrow and distant perspective, the rest of us extract pleasure from knowing the details. Have fun with your close-minded life.
"would you rather me use your mothers name in vain?"
I don't really give a fuck what you do. Go molest children for all I care. I hear Christians love that shit.
confettibrains 1 month ago 13
@QuickBlackFoxx My belife comes from God, a real being who created man,this world and the laws of what you call science.this worls and the laws of nature and the unchangable laws of this univerce are the proof,this is all the proof i need,but i will say this.meeting God is also proof,yes,men wrote books,but they also wrote meetings with the lord,they wrote not fables,but there own history.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
You example of penicilin is wrong since it was discovered, as discovering something means you find something that was already there before, and penicilin had never been seen or used before then.
Secondly, you didn't answer my question; how do you know that what the bible says is true? Writing about meetings with "God" doesn't make it true, the world around us doesn't make the bible factual at all.
QuickBlackFoxx 1 month ago
@mystic81006
No religion can be any more correct than another. If your religion is true, then so are all the others because they are all based on the same method of belief
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Then the same to you,you just admited my religion was correct with in your own thinking,see how inteligent you really are.By denying mine to say your is true,you also admited mine is also correct AT THE SAME TIME SAYING NO RELIGION CAN BE MORE TRUE,LOL.But this is where you are wrong,God is not a religion,I dont follow men with religion any how,I only follow the lord.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
Yes, all religions are "true" simply because they exist in literature and people believe them. The correct religion is the one which has the most followers and the one accepted in your particular society. Greek mythology was once as popular s christianity and was a prominent religion at the time, then it became obsolete and later categorized as "mythology" and all creation myths have joined it.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@QuickBlackFoxx Its like saying, I want blue to be pink,so if I do this test blue will indeed be pink,but only becouse I wanted blue to be pink not becouse there is any real science behind it.the out come is always going to be blue turned into pink,becouse you decided the out come.real science lets nature create the out come,and this is impossible with computers and or man made tests.You follow junk science.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"you do belive in god,But you deny him all the same"
No, unlike you I was not indoctrinated with religion at a young age. My parents were both well-educated and secular and saw no need to instill primitive fairytales on me. Religion is a result of intrinsic feeling, likely a result of dopamine/norepinephrine release from the VMAT2 in response, very much similar to the way drugs influence perception and thought patterns
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Also my parents where very educated,it does not take a uneducated person to follow our lord lol,this just shows how uneducated you are about my faith is all.If religion was so primitive ,then why does most asll people follow a advanced religion? you also follow a religion of idea that hold no proof so look who is talking.there are more educated people out there in this world that follow God then there are ones who dont,so your whole comment holds no value.
mystic81006 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"If religion was so primitive ,then why does most asll people follow a advanced religion?"
Because people are fucking idiots. There is no such thing as an "advanced religion". There is nothing advanced about any religion. They were all written prior to the age of enlightenment.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Its impossible to belive any thing any of you say becouse we know you all are liers,you will lie just to prove a impossibilty,Like,bone turning into stone,this is a lie,but you support it any how,then you call your evelotion 100 percent proof with no proof,you hide the said proof down in your bacements but still say,its 100 percent proof.I will never ever belive in any man,never,you all are liers,you lie,and you have no punishment for it maing oit easy to do.
mystic81006 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
« with no proof »
You forget.
1. Evolution is not evolutionary theory. Evolution is observed. Evolutionary theory explains the observation.
2. Proof is not evidence. Mathematics and formal logic deal with proofs. The natural sciences deal with evidence, not proof.
MrGralgrathor 1 month ago
@mystic81006
"Like,bone turning into stone"
Have you never held a fossil before? These are physical objects that can be crushed and sputtered through a mass spectrometer. Fossils are undeniably made of silica and other minerals, essentially a completely different mineral composition to bone enough to where it can be called rock
confettibrains 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
« they hide all the real bones in the cellor and create fake bones to dissplay »
Indeed; the original fossils are only rarely displayed in public. They're mostly kept in stable environments in archives. The majority of objects on display are casts. Not to hide the originals, but to keep them from wear and tear and decay. You can still do the paperwork and obtain permission to study the originals, if you're willing to spend some time and effort on the matter. I'm guessing you don't.
MrGralgrathor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mystic81006
"If DNA is a self-replicating structure,then how is it that your dna,only yours is not the same as any one elses=design"
Because during gamete production, the DNA crossover (taking parts of the mother's and father's DNA) is pretty chaotic, and the total possible combinations of DNA created during this process is in the hundreds of trillions, and since there's only 7 billion people alive it is near impossible for two people to look the same.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains This is what I see,we might not see the same way,but this is due to our DNA.So if I belive in God,then its beouse of my creator,he desgined me with in my DNA MAP so I would serve him with in faith.To me,everything with in the body is a miracle,like the brain and eyes.Did you know,its a fact,we dont see with our eyes? we see with our brain=miracle,our eyes only bring in light that our brain shows us whats around us.
mystic81006 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mystic81006
"A instant change is impossible? becouse if this is the case I can point out many many changes nature does instanly"
Yes, instant changes are impossible. Life evolves because of changes that are inherited in the primordial cell (the zygote). Evolution is a hand dealt at birth, and the environment dictates if it's a winning one
There exists the ability for organisms to alter gene expression and acquire rapid changes after birth, but these are not inherited long-term
confettibrains 1 month ago
you obviously have no understanding of evolution and worse you killed three cute little animation fishys. I hope your proud.
JCross135 2 months ago
Bullshit, motha fuckin ass shit wipe dugong my dick fuck cum ass crack dildo.
zigmeala 2 months ago
@confettibrains It appears you live up to your name. You're already assuming Evolution is true when you say only bacteria existed. I can provide plenty of evidence that the Earth itself cannot be more than 15,000 years old. I can also provide examples of times Evolution kills people/hurts their health aswell as a few examples of times the Bible's advice would have saved millions of lives. See my website for some of these.
MalakaiJ 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ
"I can provide plenty of evidence that the Earth itself cannot be more than 15,000 years old."
LOL! Can't argue with someone who doesn't believe in radiometric dating. Radioactive decay is as much of a universal constant as the speed of light is.
confettibrains 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ
"Evolution kills people/hurts their health aswell as a few examples of times the Bible's advice would have saved millions of lives"
How is this possible if evolution isn't true? There's no way DNA can mutate according to you.
But if it could mutate nucleotides that produce harmful effects, then it can also produce nucleotides in locations on the chromsome that code for beneficial mutations.
confettibrains 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ What proof do you have?
A book created by a bunch of numb brain idiots who thought that the world was flat and were looking for simple answers?
Or are you going to believe scientific fact? Theres so much proof that the earth is billions of years old. Why cant you see that evolution makes no sense! As i said before you cant say somethings not true unless you understand it!
goodeid608 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ Wait how would the bible have saved lives? The church killed so many inocent people just for thinking differently! Religion destroyed many different interesting cultures, just to spread their damn beliefs! If there was no stupid religions right now we wouldnt be in any wars! There would be almost no problems, infact we would be so much farther today! If you noticed religion was the reason we called mideaval ages the dark ages! Because it held the world back!
goodeid608 2 months ago
@goodeid608
"If there was no stupid religions right now we wouldnt be in any wars! There would be almost no problems, infact we would be so much farther today"
Yep. Anthropological evidence shows us there was very little violent conflict before religion and agrarian society came along. Many heinous crimes in history were committed in name of religion
Theists in general hold a lot of anger and prejudice. Most child abusers, alcoholics, and mentally ill folk are followers of religion.
confettibrains 2 months ago
@goodeid608
"If you noticed religion was the reason we called mideaval ages the dark ages! Because it held the world back!"
You could take any theistic person and teleport them back in time to the middle ages and they'd fit right in. They really have not advanced much intellectually despite access to 400+ years of scientific knowledge at their fingertips. They might know that disease is caused by microbes rather than God, but beyond that their understanding of reality is just as primitive.
confettibrains 2 months ago 21
@confettibrains The Dark Ages were because of the prohibition of the Bible that time!!! Get the Facts! In this present "evolved world", is NO MORE LIGHT FROM THE WORD OF GOD, BUT THIS TIME the Bible is available for everyone.... see Dr. Kent Hovind on the web and be honest!
777PETERPLAJDICKO 1 month ago
@777PETERPLAJDICKO
"The Dark Ages were because of the prohibition of the Bible that time"
LOL! Do you really believe that?
"In this present "evolved world", is NO MORE LIGHT FROM THE WORD OF GOD, BUT THIS TIME the Bible is available for everyone"
Religion has become obsolete now more than its ever been in the past. As our knowledge and technology increases, the less we rely on ancient religions to explain what we see around us. More intelligence = less religion.
confettibrains 1 month ago
what is the first law of thermodynamics?
if energy can not be created or destroyed, how did it come to be?
paintballer7449 1 month ago
@paintballer7449
"if energy can not be created or destroyed, how did it come to be?"
Most scientists agree that all the energy in our universe existed within a singularity and that the big bang did not actually create new material.
What that energy existed as before the singularity could have been many things, such as another universe that had just ended its life in a big crunch (as ours might do) and that this repeats indefinitely in a closed-loop cycle
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains
this is a really good theory, makes a lot of sense.
but it still doesnt explain how matter came to be, even if it was energy from the previous universe, where did it start.
this question is more toward the people who have a hard time grasping God existing before time. if it is hard to beleive God has alway been, how hard it it to believe atoms and matter has always been?
paintballer7449 1 month ago
@paintballer7449 If god lives outside of space and time doesn't that technically mean he doesn't exist? I am also curious to know how you think our lack of understanding in something means that there is a god? When we didn't understand what caused lightning didn't we also contribute that to god?
thybigballs 1 month ago
Comment removed
confettibrains 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@paintballer7449
>if it is hard to beleive God has alway been, how hard it it to believe atoms and matter has always been
It isn't hard for me to grasp the concept of eternity. I just don't think it makes rational sense. I see no reason why a universe, whose matter has always existed, requires another object who is also eternal to "create" it (or form it in shape).
God is used to replace our lack of understanding & has been for 1000s of years to explain disease/earth/space
confettibrains 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@paintballer7449
"but it still doesnt explain how matter came to be"
It probably didnt "come to be" but rather is a fundamental attribute of reality that goes hand in hand with spacetime, dark energy, the force carriers (whatever those may be). And I suggest this because quantum entanglement shows all the particles of energy in the universe are entangled with one another. They can affect one another half way across the cosmos, as if their intrinsic properties bypass spacetime
confettibrains 1 month ago
@paintballer7449 this will explain your question /watch?annotation_id=annotation_312941&feature=iv&src_vid=wxysZmNsyDk&v=EDFJviGQth4 :)
andyeddy8 1 month ago
@confettibrains Actually it was the christians that held everyone back. The Jews new about good higiene and they suffered the least from the bubbonic plague... Before that there were all sorts of polytheistic peoples who know that the earth was round; built large megalithic structures, performed dental and brain suregery, as well as had detailed mappings of the stars...
TheBloodyBlackJackal 1 month ago
@TheBloodyBlackJackal bubonic*
TheBloodyBlackJackal 1 month ago
@confettibrains
I think you mean "humors," not microbes.
XD
recalibration 1 month ago
@recalibration
yes, I'm sure hysteria is still the widely-believed culprit by creationists
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains Im a theist, bordering on atheist, and I dont take kindly to being referred to as having the intelligence of a middle ages human. You simply dont understand the leaps and bound science has made
UpgradedWorld 1 month ago
@UpgradedWorld
You don't take kindly? I'm sorry the truth hurts. (If it wasn't true, then you would not be offended)
It is a fact that holding on to the middle age's worldviews makes you a person whose on an equivalent level of intelligence. It is you who simply does not understand the leaps and bounds science has made if you still cling to a 2,000 year-old way of explaining the physical world.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@confettibrains What the hell are you talking about? The truth hurts? Im clinging to a 2,000 year old way of explaining the physical world? At what point did you think I was stuck in the middle ages?
The reason I border on atheism is due to what ive been learning through the modern education system. I fail to understand how what I wrote could possibly be misread.
Any western theist must learn from age 5, and what they learn at age 10 far exceeds the knowledge of medieval man.
UpgradedWorld 1 month ago
@UpgradedWorld
"I fail to understand how what I wrote could possibly be misread."
You fail to understand how denying some laws of physics, chemical, archeological, paleontological, and geological science (which, by the way, are all empirical. That's why they are SCIENCE) could indicate you as holding onto a primitive worldview? I'm sorry, but it certainly does. There is no logical basis for denying fossilization, the formation of mountains, radioactive decay, evolution, ect.
confettibrains 1 month ago
@UpgradedWorld
Sorry, didn't realize you believed evolution. Well then, you certainly cannot align yourself with any mainstream religion because science contradicts every single story of creation throughout these religious ideologies.
confettibrains 1 month ago
The sad thing is that there are still 925 people that liked it..
chaincells 2 months ago
@chaincells I actually like the animation style, however ridiculous and pernicious the content. Too bad it was misused for the further dumbening of the incurious.
SalamaSond 2 months ago 2
this video is hilarious. the animation and physics are fucking terrible!!!! hahahahaha!!!!
Arch1Kid 2 months ago
Here's another fantastic celebration of ignorance. Stupidity is so funny. Let's all deny the mountains of convergent evidence for evolution, and never ever question the perfect wisdom of illiterate Iron Age tribesmen from the Middle East.
SalamaSond 2 months ago
@SalamaSond Let's all act like there's plenty of evidence for a theory that has been debunked years ago and attempt to make a mockery of a God, which wasn't even mentioned in the video, proving a point. Evolution blocks all attempts to question it. If it was so heavily proven Evolutionists would have no problem humiliating Creationists, but they never accept the chance to do it anywhere.
MalakaiJ 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ It's only through the starkest of willful ignorance that you can make such a statement. Evolution does not "block all attempts to question it" ...you're thinking of "faith". The fact is, every time we've put evolution to the test, it works. The only reason creationists aren't humilated is that they're insanely arrogant. You're being lied to: do yourself a favor, spare yourself further embarassment, get some real information from people who study this stuff.
SalamaSond 2 months ago
@SalamaSond Then why are so many scientists fired when they even hint at intelligent design? Watch "Expelled no intelligence allowed" for examples. Then tell me Evolution doesn't block all attempts to question it. I know a scientist who is INCREDIBLY well qualified, and he's terrified to even publically reveal his name in case he gets fired. I've seen the evidence. I used to believe the lie until I switched my brain on.
MalakaiJ 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ Look, this doesn't need to be a hostile exchange. You're engaged in something called "confirmation bias", wherein you're giving credence to what you WANT to believe. That's something the scientific method is good at eliminating. ID is not a theory, and it can never be, because it makes no testable claims. Evolution makes testable claims that have worked every time. "Expelled" is a perfect example of how far YEC will go, how dishonest they'll be, to avoid facing facts.
SalamaSond 2 months ago
@SalamaSond I could so easily turn confirmation bias around on you. You want to believe in Evolution, or you were indoctrinated early on and just don't want to change that belief, so you loof for evidence for it. The difference is I once believed in Evolution and my "science" teacher made a statement which made me question the theory. So I did some research, and I found Evolution to be pseudo-science and converted. What is so dishonest about Expelled? It exposes dishonesty, not creates it.
MalakaiJ 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ Actually you can't turn confirmation bias around on me. See, I started with the same belief that you did: God did it all. The differernce is that when I was shown uncomfortable evidence, I didn't reject it, I checked into its credibilty. I came to a conclusion about what is true by finding the most credible and consistant sources. The trick is to start with the evidence and see what the evidence says. It's too easy to find misleading information to back up what you already believe.
SalamaSond 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ
Please, tell me why nucleotides cannot change position on the DNA strand. Do you believe the DNA molecule is static and unable to change, even though all other organic molecules are subject to such changes? Do you distinguish the nucleotides that make the lactose tolerance gene, from the nucleotides that make other morphological evolutionary changes?
Do you draw borders between small life made of cells containing genes, from animals made of many small cells also with genes?
confettibrains 2 months ago
@SalamaSond P.S. if you got hostility from that I apologise. I do not intend any hostility. However when you said it is only through the starkest of willful ignorance I did detect some hostility in that. I find it rather funny when Evolutionists will instead attack the character or their opponants and their sources rather than providing real evidence. Calling me biased does not make me any more or less right, and it is only true to the extent that I am human.
MalakaiJ 2 months ago
@MalakaiJ
"I find it rather funny when Evolutionists will instead attack the character or their opponants and their sources rather than providing real evidence"
Because, when dealing with someone of faith, there is no need to produce evidence. Faith is defined as blind belief so there is no amount of contradicting evidence that would change their faith in ancient religious doctrine
It doesn't really do good to insult them, but it sure is a lot more fun than trying to teach them biology
confettibrains 2 months ago