We've had the cure for cancer since the 1930's but the "wealth-care" industry expects us to believe everything they say. NO WAY! Now WE THE PEOPLE know for a fact that the medical establishment is corrupt from the AMA, down through all the Universities and Med Schools down to practically every "sold-out" physician and researcher on the planet. There will be massive arrests of corrupt AMA officials very soon. These bastards are going down. RESEARCH: Royal Rife PEACE, JOY AND HAPPINESS, ALL WAYS!
I read somewhere that " Providing cancer cells with NAC, because it will increase glutathione, protects the cancer cells and prevents them from dying. " Do you think that s a true statement ? And in your view does NAC work the same way for all types of cancer cells and what would be the recommended dose ? Thanks
OK another postulation....nº 1765 for cancer. "oxidative stress" ? cancer is anaerobic,
Dr. Michelakis from Alberta is correct, prooving that cancer is a mitchondrial deficency and he prooves it. This " theory" is just another worthless theory to get money for research that goes to nowhere as usual because cancer is a Billon dollar business noy meant to be cured .
We've had the cure for cancer since the 1930's but the "wealth-care" industry expects us to believe everything they say. NO WAY! Now WE THE PEOPLE know for a fact that the medical establishment is corrupt from the AMA, down through all the Universities and Med Schools down to practically every "sold-out" physician and researcher on the planet. There will be massive arrests of corrupt AMA officials very soon. These bastards are going down. RESEARCH: Royal Rife PEACE, JOY AND HAPPINESS, ALL WAYS!
JohnWilliamCornett 1 day ago
I read somewhere that " Providing cancer cells with NAC, because it will increase glutathione, protects the cancer cells and prevents them from dying. " Do you think that s a true statement ? And in your view does NAC work the same way for all types of cancer cells and what would be the recommended dose ? Thanks
MrMithars 2 weeks ago
OK another postulation....nº 1765 for cancer. "oxidative stress" ? cancer is anaerobic,
Dr. Michelakis from Alberta is correct, prooving that cancer is a mitchondrial deficency and he prooves it. This " theory" is just another worthless theory to get money for research that goes to nowhere as usual because cancer is a Billon dollar business noy meant to be cured .
aluka1603 3 weeks ago
I bet this completely new idea is worth the Nobel prize.
bluesunpillar 1 year ago