So, as I was saying earlier: Crimes are commercial in this modern age. This conclusion is borne of the nature of the proceedings themselves: Terms and conditions and services provided, and signatures.
The only crimes that are not commercial are Common Law type crimes: Injury to people, damage to property, and fraud (which can be commercial depending on what type of fraud was committed).
@shadow1910 I would also suggest using a legal dictionary to study the Constitution and all laws you think apply to you, because the LEGAL definition usually differs from the COMMON definition:
w w w(dot)constitution(dot)org / bouv / bouvier(dot)htm
Also, for those that do not know: "Equitable law (legislative) is only applicable when in harmony with COMMON Law (unwritten/precedent law)" Marbury v. Madison, United States Supreme Court, 5 U.S. 137
Correction: Equitable Law must be in Harmony with the Constitution, which is the treaty between the States that forms the Fed. Gov. (who is supposed to have very limited and specific powers they have superseded illegally)
Common Law is the law between Sovereigns, whereas Equity law is contractual law. The Constitution is the compact/contract between states, and Equity is complimentary or guided by the principles in the Constitution. The only law that applies to us humans is Common Law.
But even so, contracts must be entered into willingly, knowingly, and voluntarily. If you are part of a contract you did not expressly agree to with a lawful "meeting of the minds" (full disclosure and voluntarily), then it is a void contract and carries with it no duties or obligations or lawful penalties in an equity proceeding (which is 99% of all courts today).
So what contracts are you party to? always ask questions, never accept anything unconditionally.
Conditional Acceptance is a very important aspect of commerce (by which all government is enacted; it's all contractual)...we Conditionally Accepted government through the terms set forth in the Constitutions, and reserve the "right to rescission" (ability to cancel) upon any breach.
Unlawful detainment/seizure, abrogation of common law rights, etc.
It is worth studying: constitutionalconcepts(dog)org ... Visit it sometime and read everything.
Quamvis lex generaliter loquitur, restringenda tamen est, ut cessante ratione et ipsa cessat. Although the law speaks generally, it is to be restrained when the reason on which it is founded fails. 4 Co. Inst. 330.
Qui non obstat quod obstare potest facere videtur. He who does not prevent what he can, seems to commit the thing. 2 Co. Inst. 146.
Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.
A wise man makes his own decisions, An ignorant man follows the public opinion.
Illud quod alias licitum non est necessitas facit licitum, et necessitas inducit privilegium quod jure privatur. That which is not otherwise permitted, necessity allows, and necessity makes a privilege which supersedes the law. 10 Co. 61.
Omnis regula suas patitur exceptiones. All rules of law are liable to exceptions.
@RoneLoc If you have a crazy babies momma! Piss her off and get her to hit you or get her boyfriend to hit you. Have a buddy film the incident. Call the Police get her or her boyfriend arrested. Make sure you do not hit her and are just a victim. Once you are the victim file for an emergency custody hearing. Show the judge the police report of her hitting you and tell the Judge she is unstable and she beats your kids.
You will then get custody and not have to pay child support!
The spirit of child support is that the parent who is not providing a stable homelife has an obligation to at least improve that homelife through monetary assistance. That is child support; joint legal/physical custody negates the need of child support.
Since you, as a parent, are a full example for your child, no lawful court would ever grant full or even joint custody of a child if you commit fraud.
Do not give illegal advice; you can be convicted of fraud and tried by a jury of your peers.
@RoneLoc I do not agree with challenging child support...I believe in the spirit of it; it should not be an inconvenience to help raise your child in whatever way you are capable. Money is the easiest way for a court to settle the dispute of parental separation.
But if the child support is being used for other-than-assistance purposes, there are ways. Talk to a competent family lawyer.
I'm not a lawyer, so I am not giving legal advice; if you want legal advice, talk to a lawyer.
By "other-than-assistance" purposes, I mean for drugs, alcohol, gambling, prostitution, etc. Unethical or immoral things. A parent can spend child support on any kind of food or homelife benefit without consequence; that is what it is for.
But if you know or have evidence that it is being used for those types of things, then you have a case for custody and/or child support from the other parent.
In these cases, you do not matter; the child does. Consider that first and foremost.
@rotnflesh You are either a Feminazi or a Mangina. Child support is an evil feminist tactic to destroy the family and financially castrate men. Do not act like child support is about children if society gave a shit about children they would not let women cut babies out of the womb because they inconvenienced women. Child support and welfare do nothing but make men unneeded. Why put up with a man when you can get his money? I follow Gods law so shove your universal law of human rights up your ass
@willyswear Funny: I know women who pay child support to the father who has full or joint primary physical custody of their children.
You promoted a fraudulent strategy to avoid parental responsibility; I hope you either have no children, or you end up paying massive child support.
I do not agree with welfare (it's a socialist concept that promotes laziness), and child support (unless the receiver lives in a slum) does not supplant income; it's augments it.
Child support is an equitable or administrative remedy for a social contract adherent who is not fulfilling his financial obligations to his or her posterity yet accepting the benefits of society. If you're a member, and accept benefits, you fulfill your obligations or you get community service and/or jail time. That's how it works.
@rotnflesh You Mangina's really disgust me you talk about Social Contracts when there are such things as no fault divorces. All a woman has to do is get pregnant and if she simply gets bored of the man she can leave him and get around 70% of his money in alimony and child support.The man can not declare bankruptcy he must simply pay or he goes to jail. You think America will remain a great country when it is a nation of broken families?
@willyswear You honestly know nothing of California laws....or my philosophy. In Cali, if a man was not present during pregnancy or at birth or during the raising of a child, he is only an "assumed father" and has no parental rights or obligations.
In that case, there is no cause for a child support order.
I was talking about a father/mother who has an actual attachment to a child and a detrimental dispute with the other parent, not every case, you dipshit retard. Learn to read.
And, quite honestly, you sound like a male chauvinist who assumes a woman commands a man's nutsack to procure the sperm needed for procreation. What a typical ignorant 2 digit-IQ assumption.
And, America is "a nation of broken families", as you put it, because too many fucking idiotic teenagers who "know it all" fuck too early or marry too quickly and are not matured enough to hold a family unit together. Fucking reject.
And my opinion of you is that you are either a) a child man with no trade or talents to pay your bills, b) and/or the recipient of a child support order, c) a deadbeat dad who doesnt have the balls to support his progeny, or d) just another troll with nothing but baseless subjective arguments (with no real value to impart to anyone reading who might be interested in furthering their learning process through observing debate) because you are the product of the above-mentioned "broken families".
@willyswear I got your number now...you are a divorced male, probably mid-30s, who pays child support to the tune of $500+/mo. with minimum custody and a beef with your ex-wife whom you cheated on and abused because she wanted an abortion of your (3rd? 4th?) child...and in your childhood, your father liked the belt and the family pastor touched you every Sunday.
@rotnflesh You are a pathetic fool with your leftist shaming tactics and ad hominem attacks. You sound like your typical Marxist loser who uses shaming and name calling when some one calls out your bullshit! I will have you know I pay no Child Support.
I also like how you attack Christians saying they are pedophiles like a typical Marxist scum bag who worships the State.
Did I explain the logic behind child support? Yes, and you have no refuted a single statement.
You label me a leftist and claim I prefer shaming one rather than debating an issue with them, but I am not the one repeatedly insulting to make a point. You are avoiding debating the issue because you know my arguments have merit, and you cannot combat them.
@rotnflesh Yes you quoted the Marxist UN Declaration of Human rights as your bullshit basis for child support and then you go and say you are not a Statist. I don't know what kind of SCAM you are running but there is something very odd about you.
You also use Marxist shaming and Ad Hominem attacks and you even threatened me with the Cyber Police.
Oh No, I got to go I think the Cyber Police are knocking on my door ! Have a nice life you crazy, idiot.
@willyswear And your source that the UN acknowledgment of Human Rights is Marxist?
You have still not provided a valid source of authority for your claims, nor diminished mine through logical or reasonable arguments.
As i said before: Until you have an argument backed by an acceptable principle, we have nothing to discuss because my claims have not been successfully challenged.
@rotnflesh Are you kidding me the UN Declaration of Human rights has in it right to Social Security, the right to leisure time, the right to a Job,. That is just a few of the positive rights set forth in the UN DofHR and lets not forget Article 28 the right to an International order. You also need to take your Marxist shaming language and Christian hating and shove it where the sun does not shine you feminized, globalist , America hating idiot.
@willyswear 1. Social security is a SOCIALIST concept, not a communist one.
2. Everyone should be entitled to trade their labor for remuneration; that's called a JOB.
3. Nobody should have to work 24/7; that's acknowledgment of LEISURE TIME.
4. Many of my friends, as well as my wife and her family, are born-again Christians. I respect the teachings of Jesus Christ and am regarded as a "guy who will be saved one day" by my extended family.
What I do NOT respect are insignificant trolls (dime a dozen) who invade youtube (and blogs) and spam their hateful trashy ideas.
I also do not respect men who cannot support their progeny in whatever capacity they can. If you stick it in, you get to raise it (as part of the family, or in support of it). So keep your selfish ideas away; I have no desire for them.
Were I and my wife to divorce, I would pay my child support because I know it would go towards my child's upbringing in my absence.
And you call me an "America hating idiot"....Amazing. Kool-aid at work!
For me to hate America, I would need to hate all of America...that includes Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, etc.
You mean the United States? Nope. I know and respect my rights, and the rights of others, probably better than most people you know; I injure nobody, nor damage their property, nor conduct fraud. I support non-profit (like United Way/Salvation Army) and do community service in soup kitchens.
@rotnflesh You are such a joke talking about the social contract of a man having to support a child for life but have no problems with a women cutting that baby out of the womb then throwing that child into the trash can. Killing babies is perfectly with in the bounds of the social contract. Do you have any idea how deeply indoctrinated you are and how much cognitive dissonance is going on inside your head?
@willyswear Do not assume: I do not agree with abortion, and I do not believe I have the right to judge one who commits such an act; that is God's job, not yours or mine. YOUR job, and MY job, is to live our OWN lives as best we can according to the terms God gave us. Quit trying to control others.
And, as i said in the beginning: You giving advice to commit fraud is conspiracy to commit fraud; that's up to 10 years in prison. You aren't too bright; this is all cached/logged.
Ron Paul.......
mamabritts 3 months ago
So, as I was saying earlier: Crimes are commercial in this modern age. This conclusion is borne of the nature of the proceedings themselves: Terms and conditions and services provided, and signatures.
The only crimes that are not commercial are Common Law type crimes: Injury to people, damage to property, and fraud (which can be commercial depending on what type of fraud was committed).
rotnflesh 1 year ago
And most importantly:
Qui vult decipi, decipiatur. Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh
Where are these from, try looking them up online but couldn't find any. Please help me out.
shadow1910 1 year ago
@shadow1910 Bouvier's Maxims of Law:
famguardian(dot)org / Publications / BouvierMaximsOfLaw / BouviersMaxims(dot)htm
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@shadow1910 I would also suggest using a legal dictionary to study the Constitution and all laws you think apply to you, because the LEGAL definition usually differs from the COMMON definition:
w w w(dot)constitution(dot)org / bouv / bouvier(dot)htm
Also, for those that do not know: "Equitable law (legislative) is only applicable when in harmony with COMMON Law (unwritten/precedent law)" Marbury v. Madison, United States Supreme Court, 5 U.S. 137
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Correction: Equitable Law must be in Harmony with the Constitution, which is the treaty between the States that forms the Fed. Gov. (who is supposed to have very limited and specific powers they have superseded illegally)
Common Law is the law between Sovereigns, whereas Equity law is contractual law. The Constitution is the compact/contract between states, and Equity is complimentary or guided by the principles in the Constitution. The only law that applies to us humans is Common Law.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
As long as you have not contracted into subjective status, that is.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
But even so, contracts must be entered into willingly, knowingly, and voluntarily. If you are part of a contract you did not expressly agree to with a lawful "meeting of the minds" (full disclosure and voluntarily), then it is a void contract and carries with it no duties or obligations or lawful penalties in an equity proceeding (which is 99% of all courts today).
So what contracts are you party to? always ask questions, never accept anything unconditionally.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Conditional Acceptance is a very important aspect of commerce (by which all government is enacted; it's all contractual)...we Conditionally Accepted government through the terms set forth in the Constitutions, and reserve the "right to rescission" (ability to cancel) upon any breach.
Unlawful detainment/seizure, abrogation of common law rights, etc.
It is worth studying: constitutionalconcepts(dog)org ... Visit it sometime and read everything.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Quamvis lex generaliter loquitur, restringenda tamen est, ut cessante ratione et ipsa cessat. Although the law speaks generally, it is to be restrained when the reason on which it is founded fails. 4 Co. Inst. 330.
Qui non obstat quod obstare potest facere videtur. He who does not prevent what he can, seems to commit the thing. 2 Co. Inst. 146.
Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Remember these rules, people:
A wise man makes his own decisions, An ignorant man follows the public opinion.
Illud quod alias licitum non est necessitas facit licitum, et necessitas inducit privilegium quod jure privatur. That which is not otherwise permitted, necessity allows, and necessity makes a privilege which supersedes the law. 10 Co. 61.
Omnis regula suas patitur exceptiones. All rules of law are liable to exceptions.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
whats with your tags? Glad I'm not the only one in Florida
teckniec2 1 year ago
how do i challenge child support?
RoneLoc 1 year ago
@RoneLoc With a lawyer. Basically if you are male, you only win if the child is not yours. If the kid is yours, you should WANT to pay up.
NETWizzJbirk 1 year ago
@RoneLoc If you have a crazy babies momma! Piss her off and get her to hit you or get her boyfriend to hit you. Have a buddy film the incident. Call the Police get her or her boyfriend arrested. Make sure you do not hit her and are just a victim. Once you are the victim file for an emergency custody hearing. Show the judge the police report of her hitting you and tell the Judge she is unstable and she beats your kids.
You will then get custody and not have to pay child support!
willyswear 1 year ago
@willyswear Plus peccat auctor quam actor. The instigator of a crime is worse than he who perpetrates it. 5 Co. 99.
That is equivalent to fraud, and will land you in more trouble then the person who assaulted you.
Do not attempt to find ways to abrogate a Universal Law of Human Rights (right to a prosperous family is the right that governs child support)
rotnflesh 1 year ago
The spirit of child support is that the parent who is not providing a stable homelife has an obligation to at least improve that homelife through monetary assistance. That is child support; joint legal/physical custody negates the need of child support.
Since you, as a parent, are a full example for your child, no lawful court would ever grant full or even joint custody of a child if you commit fraud.
Do not give illegal advice; you can be convicted of fraud and tried by a jury of your peers.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@RoneLoc I do not agree with challenging child support...I believe in the spirit of it; it should not be an inconvenience to help raise your child in whatever way you are capable. Money is the easiest way for a court to settle the dispute of parental separation.
But if the child support is being used for other-than-assistance purposes, there are ways. Talk to a competent family lawyer.
I'm not a lawyer, so I am not giving legal advice; if you want legal advice, talk to a lawyer.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
By "other-than-assistance" purposes, I mean for drugs, alcohol, gambling, prostitution, etc. Unethical or immoral things. A parent can spend child support on any kind of food or homelife benefit without consequence; that is what it is for.
But if you know or have evidence that it is being used for those types of things, then you have a case for custody and/or child support from the other parent.
In these cases, you do not matter; the child does. Consider that first and foremost.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh You are either a Feminazi or a Mangina. Child support is an evil feminist tactic to destroy the family and financially castrate men. Do not act like child support is about children if society gave a shit about children they would not let women cut babies out of the womb because they inconvenienced women. Child support and welfare do nothing but make men unneeded. Why put up with a man when you can get his money? I follow Gods law so shove your universal law of human rights up your ass
willyswear 1 year ago
@willyswear Funny: I know women who pay child support to the father who has full or joint primary physical custody of their children.
You promoted a fraudulent strategy to avoid parental responsibility; I hope you either have no children, or you end up paying massive child support.
I do not agree with welfare (it's a socialist concept that promotes laziness), and child support (unless the receiver lives in a slum) does not supplant income; it's augments it.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Child support is an equitable or administrative remedy for a social contract adherent who is not fulfilling his financial obligations to his or her posterity yet accepting the benefits of society. If you're a member, and accept benefits, you fulfill your obligations or you get community service and/or jail time. That's how it works.
If you don't like it, you can move.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh You Mangina's really disgust me you talk about Social Contracts when there are such things as no fault divorces. All a woman has to do is get pregnant and if she simply gets bored of the man she can leave him and get around 70% of his money in alimony and child support.The man can not declare bankruptcy he must simply pay or he goes to jail. You think America will remain a great country when it is a nation of broken families?
willyswear 1 year ago
@willyswear You honestly know nothing of California laws....or my philosophy. In Cali, if a man was not present during pregnancy or at birth or during the raising of a child, he is only an "assumed father" and has no parental rights or obligations.
In that case, there is no cause for a child support order.
I was talking about a father/mother who has an actual attachment to a child and a detrimental dispute with the other parent, not every case, you dipshit retard. Learn to read.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
And, quite honestly, you sound like a male chauvinist who assumes a woman commands a man's nutsack to procure the sperm needed for procreation. What a typical ignorant 2 digit-IQ assumption.
And, America is "a nation of broken families", as you put it, because too many fucking idiotic teenagers who "know it all" fuck too early or marry too quickly and are not matured enough to hold a family unit together. Fucking reject.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
And my opinion of you is that you are either a) a child man with no trade or talents to pay your bills, b) and/or the recipient of a child support order, c) a deadbeat dad who doesnt have the balls to support his progeny, or d) just another troll with nothing but baseless subjective arguments (with no real value to impart to anyone reading who might be interested in furthering their learning process through observing debate) because you are the product of the above-mentioned "broken families".
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@willyswear I got your number now...you are a divorced male, probably mid-30s, who pays child support to the tune of $500+/mo. with minimum custody and a beef with your ex-wife whom you cheated on and abused because she wanted an abortion of your (3rd? 4th?) child...and in your childhood, your father liked the belt and the family pastor touched you every Sunday.
Getting close?
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh You are a pathetic fool with your leftist shaming tactics and ad hominem attacks. You sound like your typical Marxist loser who uses shaming and name calling when some one calls out your bullshit! I will have you know I pay no Child Support.
I also like how you attack Christians saying they are pedophiles like a typical Marxist scum bag who worships the State.
willyswear 1 year ago
@willyswear Did I say Christians? Nope.
Did I say I subscribe to Marxist communism? Nope.
Did I explain the logic behind child support? Yes, and you have no refuted a single statement.
You label me a leftist and claim I prefer shaming one rather than debating an issue with them, but I am not the one repeatedly insulting to make a point. You are avoiding debating the issue because you know my arguments have merit, and you cannot combat them.
Until you do, we have nothing left to discuss.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Perhaps I should have said priest, but it doesn't matter: Religions of all kinds have pedophiles.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh Yes you quoted the Marxist UN Declaration of Human rights as your bullshit basis for child support and then you go and say you are not a Statist. I don't know what kind of SCAM you are running but there is something very odd about you.
You also use Marxist shaming and Ad Hominem attacks and you even threatened me with the Cyber Police.
Oh No, I got to go I think the Cyber Police are knocking on my door ! Have a nice life you crazy, idiot.
willyswear 1 year ago
@willyswear And your source that the UN acknowledgment of Human Rights is Marxist?
You have still not provided a valid source of authority for your claims, nor diminished mine through logical or reasonable arguments.
As i said before: Until you have an argument backed by an acceptable principle, we have nothing to discuss because my claims have not been successfully challenged.
Go drink your kool-aid, deadbeat dad.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh Are you kidding me the UN Declaration of Human rights has in it right to Social Security, the right to leisure time, the right to a Job,. That is just a few of the positive rights set forth in the UN DofHR and lets not forget Article 28 the right to an International order. You also need to take your Marxist shaming language and Christian hating and shove it where the sun does not shine you feminized, globalist , America hating idiot.
willyswear 1 year ago
@willyswear 1. Social security is a SOCIALIST concept, not a communist one.
2. Everyone should be entitled to trade their labor for remuneration; that's called a JOB.
3. Nobody should have to work 24/7; that's acknowledgment of LEISURE TIME.
4. Many of my friends, as well as my wife and her family, are born-again Christians. I respect the teachings of Jesus Christ and am regarded as a "guy who will be saved one day" by my extended family.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
What I do NOT respect are insignificant trolls (dime a dozen) who invade youtube (and blogs) and spam their hateful trashy ideas.
I also do not respect men who cannot support their progeny in whatever capacity they can. If you stick it in, you get to raise it (as part of the family, or in support of it). So keep your selfish ideas away; I have no desire for them.
Were I and my wife to divorce, I would pay my child support because I know it would go towards my child's upbringing in my absence.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
And you call me an "America hating idiot"....Amazing. Kool-aid at work!
For me to hate America, I would need to hate all of America...that includes Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, etc.
You mean the United States? Nope. I know and respect my rights, and the rights of others, probably better than most people you know; I injure nobody, nor damage their property, nor conduct fraud. I support non-profit (like United Way/Salvation Army) and do community service in soup kitchens.
Try again.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh You are such a joke talking about the social contract of a man having to support a child for life but have no problems with a women cutting that baby out of the womb then throwing that child into the trash can. Killing babies is perfectly with in the bounds of the social contract. Do you have any idea how deeply indoctrinated you are and how much cognitive dissonance is going on inside your head?
willyswear 1 year ago
@willyswear Do not assume: I do not agree with abortion, and I do not believe I have the right to judge one who commits such an act; that is God's job, not yours or mine. YOUR job, and MY job, is to live our OWN lives as best we can according to the terms God gave us. Quit trying to control others.
And, as i said in the beginning: You giving advice to commit fraud is conspiracy to commit fraud; that's up to 10 years in prison. You aren't too bright; this is all cached/logged.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rotnflesh Hahahaha are you going to report me to the Cyber Police! You are so pathetic I found a video with you in it. watch?v=dYrlj9VE2fg
willyswear 1 year ago
So is this guy going to spread this information throughout his county via flyers and bullhorning?
ArrestAJudgeKit 1 year ago
lol. It's gone from "This guy doesn't know what he's talking about" to "It's better just to pay the ticket."
In other words, T-guy was right.
JesusDillinger 1 year ago
Fight the power!!!!!!
DESERTHAWKIN 1 year ago
"Uniform Citation" Citations must be written in a certain way. Certain sections Must be filled out or it violates FEDERAL LAW!!
Genoside5 1 year ago