2:28 even their excuse is inapropriate,, how would u deem xrl as collective interest?? i mean,, how many % of the hk population is benefited from xrl??
@isotecetonore true, true. As the matter of fact, after trashing all the interest that could be not trashed, demolishing the village that could be not demolished, HK can hardly balance the cost plus almost no average citizens can use the XRL, no to mention the villagers. This rape of public property is for nothing but kissing ass of the central gov, which is very much close to pervert and being nuts. Why would the gov "love" HK much more the less just by completing a plan? I don't get it
According to what he says, we need every single people to approve all development projects. If this is the case, we will have no urban redevelopment. His example on Lee Ka Shing is also not appropriate. The government is willing to make compensations, and the government has offered. He is making a misleading example. On the other hand, he is actually promoting 極權思想. He intends to give all people a "VETO". United Nations is somewhat handicapped as some members have "VETO".
多數人要遷就少數人？多數人眼見香港既優勢開始俾大陸取代，前景堪慮
LG4761 2 years ago
totalitarism is the evil,, and money is the tool
isotecetonore 2 years ago
2:28 even their excuse is inapropriate,, how would u deem xrl as collective interest?? i mean,, how many % of the hk population is benefited from xrl??
isotecetonore 2 years ago
@isotecetonore true, true. As the matter of fact, after trashing all the interest that could be not trashed, demolishing the village that could be not demolished, HK can hardly balance the cost plus almost no average citizens can use the XRL, no to mention the villagers. This rape of public property is for nothing but kissing ass of the central gov, which is very much close to pervert and being nuts. Why would the gov "love" HK much more the less just by completing a plan? I don't get it
idmangqn 1 year ago
加油老徐!
manic9484 2 years ago 3
我認為佢本身亦都係一個極權思想主義者，不過佢既極權觀點係在於小數人身上i.e. 菜園村居民。
加上成日話民主，話文明，不過已經將民主同文明既定義歪曲。民主，就係要小數服從多數，如果要反對應該於最後拍板之前以足夠理由去反對，以及提出改善方案去令大多數人信服；而文明更加係要進步，而唔係固步自封。
ukrikou 2 years ago
@ukrikou
民主和民權是兩回事, 不是有民主 (600 人選的太守唔算, 功能組別唔算), 就可以不理人權.
60% 香港人支持明天把你的財產分掉, 就可以做?
gobiohk 2 years ago
你的比喻會唔會過份偏激？你需要的是理智的討論。
人權的確是有需要保護，但亦需要平衡對整個社會的影響，如果唔係政府係唔需要作出任何的賠償。現實社會上係唔會一個十全十美的建議，一定有得有失，我都好想睇下香港幾時再有暴動，一定成為國際的佳話...
ukrikou 2 years ago 2
講得好
enochhylam 2 years ago
如果同一些貪得無厭而又位高權重的人講道理是有用,孫中山當年都唔駛搞革命吧,睇下香港幾時暴動吧......
hongkongtim 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
有正義感的人都應該憎恨香港人,因為它們絕對是人渣
FXXKYOUTVB 2 years ago 2
According to what he says, we need every single people to approve all development projects. If this is the case, we will have no urban redevelopment. His example on Lee Ka Shing is also not appropriate. The government is willing to make compensations, and the government has offered. He is making a misleading example. On the other hand, he is actually promoting 極權思想. He intends to give all people a "VETO". United Nations is somewhat handicapped as some members have "VETO".
bbqiller 2 years ago
@bbqiller
Where on earth did you read "every single people to approve all development projects"??
He said, the community needs to have approval from THOSE WHO HAVE THEIR HUMAN mutilated to proceed.
COMPREHEND Pls.
gobiohk 2 years ago
Not agree
bbqiller 2 years ago
良心的聲音, 謝謝
dreamy2 2 years ago 2
good point~~
jasonkks 2 years ago
講得好岩
alex2388hk 2 years ago