Added: 3 years ago
From: TheGreatWorker
Views: 8,110
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (67)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Music to my ears: "No, I want to change the system"!

  • and this was 4 years ago... and stil being ignored

  • nader is boss!!!

  • grate interview, sad I found it so late...

  • Liberal and Libertarian, with their forces combined, our country will have Liberty!

  • IN MY OPINION ...PAUL/NADER 2012 THEY WOULD CREATE THE BEST PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT EVER THEY WOULD HELP EACH OTHER BECAUSE THEY HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS ONLY A FEW POINTS JUST THINK OPEN DEBATES IN THE OVAL OFFICE ABOUT WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WOULD BE MIND BLOWING

  • 2 great men are sitting next to each other in this vid. I hope Ron Paul wins the presidency in 2012 and puts Nader in his cabinet.

  • The answer is THE CONSTITUTION and NOTHING else. Parties are IRRELEVANT!

    Ron Paul 2012.

  • CNN is a half-baked pep rally broadcast for the two corporate parties. a damn shame what the media has become.

  • That is ironic when you consider one is an extreme left winger, the other is an extreme right winger.

  • @RJWooller I would have to disagree. Nader is opposed to gun control and when once asked questions on gay issues he said he doesn't do "gonadal politics" unlike the extreme left wingers who want to shove their social issues down people's throats. Ron Paul doesn't want to interfere in people's personal lives unlike extreme right wingers who want to shove their social issues down people's throats. IMHO they seem to be common sense middle of the road. Like on those 4 issues stated above.

  • @kcrich13 And the rigft keep shoving the anti-gay marriage down our throats.

  • Ron Paul said he wants a third party then he says he wants to stop Obama...interesting.

  • Why does Ron Paul run on the GOP ticket? BECAUSE HE KNOWS 3RD PARTIES NEVER WIN. He could run for congress as a Libertarian. Or on the Constitution Party ticket. He doesn't. You want to preach principles? Then put your campaign (and your money) where your mouth is, Mr. Paul. If you're so disgusted with the 2 party system-then get out of it.

  • I like how even when sitting next to Ralph Nader, someone who both share the same ideas about 3rd party's, Ron Paul says that he's not going to vote for Nader because he doesn't share the same principles. Two great men.

  • 6:56 In answer to the question, "Who is the lesser of two bads?", Ralph Nader answered immediately: "The lesser of two bads is not good enough for the American people. We need the best." A great response from a man truly governed by his principles.

  • "There's no debate going on, this is a ritual, this is a charade." Well said.

  • Wolf, the American people can do anything, we can elect a 3rd party candidate, we can change the constitution if we want "Anything but the Preamble" We can even stop watching CNN and turn your fucking lights out.

    Period.

  • The media always tries to subjugate @RonPaul as a third party candidate...this was a mistake for Ron Paul in the past...

    If you notice they've been trying to do the same thing again in 2011/12

  • i like to see this starting a real change

    good guys working together

    uk says good luck to both.

  • Nader needs to run again. He'd get my vote. Ron Paul is a good guy and i like and repsect him a lot to the point where I even considered registering Republican to vote for him in the primary, but some of his extreame domestic policies are policies I just can't stomach. .

  • Oh man, it's so true about lesser of two evils. Obama got involved in a third war while promising to reduce the bring the troops home...

  • Wolf Blitzer is such a douchebag. Why does he try to frame every question within the context of the two-party system, when that's exactly what Paul and Nader are trying to circumvent? It's like he's incapable of thinking any other way.

  • @chaosthethird Well, his corporate bosses need to get their two horses into the lead. I think the most ignorant fucking thing he's ever said was when he turns to Ralph and goes "You're not going to win, you *know* you're not going to win, so why are you in the race?". What an asshole.

  • @chaosthethird That being said, he has the right name and the right amount of facial hair to star in a werewolf movie.

  • @chaosthethird Wolf is a Zionist.

  • Wolf Blitzer and the rest of the MSM suck.

  • If Ralph and Paul would run together they would win.

  • vote independent

  • "Evil is evil" LMAO. I love Dr. Paul!

  • Nader is a moron

    Ron Paul is a modern-day Founding Father

  • @rocketcunt So he's a modern-day slave owner?

  • @LiberalJerseyman back under your rock, troll

  • They're 100% right. When they're up for election they argue whether we should or shouldn't go to war, whether we should or shouldn't expand the government, ex-cetra. When they've been elected they don't keep their promises and their tune changes. Now they argue the number of people that should be sent to war, how big should we allow the government to get this year, and so on.

  • 2 best candidates

  • Ron Paul and Ralph Nader are both very correct in what their saying. In relation to economic policies, I fully agree with Nader compared to Ron. But I really respect Mr Paul for his efforts. Greatful sir!

  • RON PAUL HAS BALLS!

  • CNN THE ULTIMATE SELLOUT

  • RON PAUL ONLY HOPE!!! lettertogop . com add your name!!!!!

    RON PAUL RON PAUL MAKE LOVE NOT WAR !!!!!! campaignforliberty . com become a member!!!!!

    BUSH,Obama, McCAIN ONLY WAR IN BRAIN!!!! VOTE Ron Paul!!!!

    LET'S STOP RECESSION ONLY HOPE IS RON PAUL!!!! DONATE DONATE DONATE !!!!!

    START IT TODAY Buy "The Revolution: A Manifesto" by Ron Paul

  • Ron Paul is not a candidate!

    Ron Paul says vote independent or 3rd party.

    Anyone who doesn't back the 3rd candidate is a corporate tool.

  • nader will snatch votes from mccain, because he is more conservative than mccain.

  • We must all get behind Nader and show the bastards what for!

  • Nader said 9/11 could be inside job!

    NADER NADER!

  • So you're saying Nader is a dumb fuck? Why be so mean to the man who clearly saved America from the threats of the terroristic Iraq for example... if it hadn't been for Nader, Gore might have been elected and we wouldn't have gone to war... thus allowing terrorists to win! Nader saved us. So be nice :)

  • No I'm saying you are a dumbf##k if you believe the ridiculous government cospiracy lie. Or an immoral soulless bastard for being paid to spread lies that are destroying our country,asshole.

  • You don't know what happened. You feel there is a conspiracy but chances are, conspiracy isn't as simple as OUR GOVERNMENT DECIDED TO BLOW OUR BUILDINGS UP. Unfortunately, it's deeper than that - our gov't hasn't treated the world too well, so the world hit back - like Ron Paul's "blowback" theory. But I will never believe our gov't did 9/11. They can still be blamed, but cuz of their policies, not because of their direct involvement. And now I'd rather have Dems instead of Reps in white house.

  • I know a lot more about it than you.If you believe the story about Bin Laden you are a moron, blaming Bin Laden explains nothing.

    Could Bi Laden get past Marvi Bush's msecurity at the towers to rig the most technologocally advanced CD in history?Have you seen the Judy Wood pictures? Can you explain that?Could Bin Laden get past NORAD and the anti-aircraft missile batteries at the Pentagon that will automatically shoot down anything without a military transponder?

  • If you think kerosene which burns open air temp of 549.5 F can make a steel building,only 3 times in history on a single day,pulverize itself into micro-fine dust and 30-foot thermite-cut steel(m.p.steel=2750 F! beams, then I guess you will believe anything.

    Obama says he will expand the lie of the war on terror into Pakistan,who has nukes and says they will do whatever it takes to defend itself!Truth is it doesn't matter, the repiglicans will steal it again.They are already stealing the polls.

  • Or perhaps you believe the latest changed story from NIST, in which BURNING OFFICE FURNITURE demolished the buliding.There is no hope with a public this unable to reason.

  • @roscogre Yeah maybe the 2 planes that slammed into it had something to do with it

  • @tjohn1986 there were no planes moron

  • @roscogre yes of course there were no planes involved in 9/11

  • I don't "feel" or "believe" anything. I have to be convinced by evidence before I accept anything as fact.I don't believe in religion,god,UFO's,bigfoot or reptoids everything I say I can back up with loads of evidence. So don't make assumptions about what I know,you poor little flouride baby.

  • Oh please retard. You have good evidence that OUR government has destroyed our buildings. Nigga please. I may not believe in religion and other weirdness, but your "conspiracy" believes are just as far fetched, and spare me your evidence. I have evidence that you're crazy, simply by looking at your comments. I bet neo-cons want you in jail for hating US, but you should slide on the account of your stupidity. Hence your political efforts will always amount to a big ZERO. Just wait & see urself :)

  • there is no need citing evidence to morons and pasid liars we know the truth and all your lies cannot obliterate it! 3 steel buldings in the history of the world pulverized at faster than free fall speed directly into the path of most resistance from fire!How can anyone can believe your ridiculous, fascist,conspiracy theory about goatherders in a cave in Afghanistan having NORAD stand down.

    I'm sure the flouride and mercury,beer and sports, and constant propaganda have had an effect.

  • LMFAO 3rd party blimp. priceless.

  • BARR didnt show up he wanted RON PAUL to back him and he wouldnt

  • Awesome, awesome! Thank you! : )

  • So Dr.Paul says he wants to take votes away from Senator Obama ,but not Republican Senator John McCain?Hmmm...

  • You're reading too much in to it. If it had been Bob Barr sitting next to him, he'd have said he wanted to take votes away from McCain.

  • I doubt that.They're both fascists(1951 dictionary definition.) I'm not reading into it,just noticing it.

  • i wish paul and the 3rd partiers would have banded together behind one ticket.

  • we are. Nader

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more