rofl this was so funny! I love the EUREKAAAAAAA!! Sadly, I think if I ever tried playing soccer with my friends, it would turn out like the beginning of this match. Except we wouldn't be coming up with great theories .
woudl be fun to see schopenhauer foul hagel lol and watch him walk away pretending nothing happened. also germs should score first and then have Marx score a own goal to make it more equal. i want a 90min match lol
When I first saw this sketch, I wondered if the Greeks passing off the ball to one another was more or less a metaphor for how different Greek philosophical concepts and ideas coincided and supported one another.
IH and TN have a point: humans need free will (or at least the illusion thereof) to thrive, as individualism plays a role in invention and the advancement of art and technology. Plato poses in his republic that the ideal state is a benevolent dictatorship, however this is a practical impossibility due to avarice and the instinct to ensure the well-being of blood relations before all others. As such, a perfect socialist state is an impossibility, as is a truly "benevolent" dictatorship.
@kittykitty1987 I completely agree. An ideal state of existence within a society is entirely subjective and an individual's interpretation of a Utopia is fulfilled by criteria that will never be completely, or even slightly ubiquitous. I am not at all Theistic, but what would happen if an exterior authority imposed free will on humanity overall? Does that not contradict the whole idea of human volition?
There is no 'r' at the end of "Nietzsche." Why do they pronounce it as "Neetcher?" I've always hated that. They say it that way in 'The Meaning of Life' also. It makes my ears bleed when they say it that way!
@IggyHazard Because it's a German name and in the German language, one pronounces it so. "Neetcha." Porsche is also pronounced this way. We English speaking folk love to anglicise foreign words, don't we?! It's just too difficult to try pronouncing them the correct way... >.<
@weirdunclebob Our way is more correct than theirs. Western cultural supremacy uber alles!
}:-D
I mean really. Germans and Swiss are supposed to be smart but they can't even pronounce their own names right. An 'e' at the end is pronounced as a "schwa." 'W' is 'V'. It's retarded! Not as retarded as French, though. All those unnecessary unpronounced letters. They have the pompous aristocracy to thank for that. The language actually used to make more sense before they jacked it up.
@theneenjah Individualism pwns collectivism. Always. Any Westerner who betrays the ideals of individual liberty is a traitor to the West. Death to collectivism!
@IggyHazard Well you're biased then :P And i'm saying culture wise. Like food, decor, martial arts, lifestyles, art, etc. Obviously I personally believe that East is better than West. Communism > Democracy.
@theneenjah All forms of bureaucratic collectivism and totalitarianism need to be exterminated with a clenched fist. State economies are for the weak. Only degenerate parasites actively seek for the government to rule over them. Only the most depraved masochists actively seek for their faces to be stomped by the iron-heeled jackboot of the state.
@theneenjah That's exactly the problem. It's too perfect. Perfection is oppressive. Under communism, there's no room for chaos. People need chaos because it liberates us.
@weirdunclebob Even if it's intended to be pronounced "Neetcha," that still doesn't give English speaking peoples an excuse to jack it up even more by saying "Neetcher."
@IggyHazard There's not really much difference between the two, is there, though? Unlike, say, my name pronounced by an Aussie/Pom compared to how someone from North America would pronounce it: Rob compared to Rarb. Fortunately, nobody over there called me Bob. It would sound like Barb which is short for Barbara, which I'm obviously not!. Being called 'Rarb' was bad enough!
@IggyHazard There's not really much difference between the two, is there, though? Unlike, say, my name pronounced by an Aussie/Pom compared to how someone from North America would pronounce it: Rob compared to Rarb. Fortunately, nobody over there called me Bob. It would sound like Barb which is short for Barbara, which I'm obviously not!. Being called 'Rarb' was bad enough!
Every time I watch this, I wonder WTH Beckenbauer didn't simply get the ball and score as many goals as he'd want... He didn't have to get an "Eureka" to know what to do...
Nietzsche and Hegel would actually have a major run-in after a few seconds of discussion. *g* And there is NO way anyone else than the great Socrates could score in a philosophy match. :)
isnt it wonderful, on the comments for this video people are quoting philosophy and are being intellectual and there is nobody making stupid arguments like there normally would be,thank you pythons,thank you for making youtube a more intellectual place.
No, its a victory for Archimedes because actually doing something is common sense. Marx was brought into the lineup and - nothing happens, what a shame. The joke is that the Germans' arguments are based on their philosophies and in Marx's cause it isn't to argue what reality is but to argue the rules are unfair, but in the end its all the same result - Greeks win! Greeks win!
the best thing about this sketch is that Marx claims it was offside (which it was), whilst all the other philosophers are busy spouting lofty conceptual debate. A victory for the common sense of Marx.
@eraserhead321 It's true, because communism is a simple aspect and common sense would dictate that it is a perfectly logical outcome to having a utopia of a government. But Human nature makes communism corrupt, because man kind itself is corrupt, and always wants more. Nobody is content with mediocrity, and everyone has a competitive spirit to excel past the person to his left or right whether he can or cant.
@wheregarbl very true... but the irony is communism would make everyone better off, happier and dare I say it... richer! By which I mean it's a more stable economic system that nurtures growth in business.
@eraserhead321 I have never been a great fan of communism because it destroys the one characteristic that links us with animals- the survival of the fittest. In capitalism the clever and talented become rich and live better lives. The less talented do not, and so in this loose definition don't 'survive' (of course in a literal sense they do). I don't believe in the philosophy that those who have worked hard to attain their talent or knowledge should give it up for others who lacked such a drive.
I consider myself being a communist... Being communist is not to kill everything you call drive but to maintain a society for everybody... besides not knowing what communism stands for you also lack the knowledge about Darwin and his theory of evolution... pity.... fair enough not to be a communist... but try and get your facts straight concerning evolution... had to act on this
@hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD I am not as talented a writer as Karl Marx or Charles Darwin so I apologise that I have not been able to go in completely in depth in my discussion of both of these concepts with the constraints of 500 characters. I do have a thorough knowledge of Darwin's 'The Evolution of Species'; I studied it in English Literature after all. I find it rather condescending that you assume I do not know about either of these concepts just because I only outlined my argument.
@jammakane10 that said marx should be recognised for his ratonale behind it which was to provide an alternative to capitalism that didnt reslt in worker exploitation even thoughof course the applied version DID result in it. , that said our system isnt pure capitalism either, nor was it back in the 19th century.
but my guess is that a sstem thats the best is somewhere in between thats flui with capitalism to provide that drivebut also possesses a sytem protectings rights of workers etc.
@hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD If you were to meet me in real life and we would have a more thorough discussion of these concepts. Until then, try not to insult people and thus show your own lack of common intelligence.
@wheregarbl communism would not work for the simple reason that Marx used building material from the capitalist with its flaws and all so even if communism appears drastic different its still defective exactly how capitalism is defective. Also i don't think any political theory accept fascism and dictatorship can be taken seriously in a post modern world, we have computers that changes EVERYTHING it also changes existentialism
Archimedes was the best on this match, well any match, he was in favour of what became the scientific principle to investigate the natural world. Plato has been too strong in the West for too long, his idealism is just plain stupid. A good touch here is that Confucius is the judge, as he was in favour of family and order.
Damn,I thought the positioning of Socrates as sweeper would be a great impediment to the Greek team,not to mention that Marx failed to bring the Germans to par with the Greeks.I DEMAND A METAPHORICAL REMATCH!
i don't know all the rules of the philosophers' game in detail. the crucial question is: was socrates, my favorite bras... greek philosopher really offsides? if he was, i'd strongly recommend the Filosofers In Fight Association to change this rule. as DrFugue said, "if the dribbler with the ball has already beaten the last defender, there is not such thing as offsides".
i know karl marx was so right in so many ways, this time he wasn't. or at least he shouldn't be right.
@superstar122251 I guess its just poking fun at how regular sports announcers will throw in some background information when a pivotal decision like a substitution is made in-game
actually, if the dribbler with the ball has already beaten the last defender, there is not such thing as offsides, archimedes had already gotten past the last guy, so it doesn't matter where Socrates is, he is onsides no matter what.
This reminded me when Antartica played Siberia in the same tournament in an earlier tie...both sides were so niave they played football for the whole 90 minutes! What a meaningless,boring game! The match ended in a pointless 4-4 draw.
Thank God.,if he exists,for two classic sides like these two here.
The only one I know is Walter Carnielli who is a top class logician. But maybe they get to include Socrates in their team who obtained a degree in philosophy after his retirement from futebol.
@Guaguanco11 of course, brazil is a very young country, these philosophers are from a time where Brazil didn't exist, and I could say more 10 things but i'm tired
The Germans are disputing it. Hegel is arguing that the reality is merely an a priori adjunct of non-naturalistic ethics, Kant via the categorical imperative is holding that ontologically it exists only in the imagination, and Marx is claiming it was offside...Fucking genius. lmfao!!
The Greeks are still lacking any proof that this goal wasn't just a mere image of self-projected sensory experiences deriving from the faculty of transcendental imagination thus stripping the goal of any manifestation in our reality!
how do you want to make sure, that this self-projected sensory as you call it is not the proof itself for the real manifestation itself? i think that is what a supporter of materialism would argue
But where are the Germans getting their motivation from to argue its no goal in the first place? Confucius awarding the goal is an act no less or more real than the ball finding the back of the net. For the Germans to argue no goal, they have to testify to the reality of Confucius awarding the goal. You can't deny the goal's reality, and yet accept the reality of Confucius' awarding it.
Either accept both, or deny both. And if it's the latter you choose, then theres nothing to argue about LOL
@SchwarzundWeis They don't need to prove it because it is an accepted maxim, a basic truth requiring no proof necessary for any arguement, for without maxims it is impossible to answer any question, and a debate as simple as whether or not to order extra cheese on your pizza will leave you completely insane, wiggling in outraged annoyance like an octopus caught in lava.
@superlardbucket hey, i just copied and pasted a guys post before just to get the most thumbs up as possible. we humans have so simple motives, especially on youtube :-)
Hahaha, Oh God, I just wish I understood more about the philosophers to understand this better. One day I will come back and get all of the jokes I missed :P
I love Marx chasing after the referee arguing the call! Is that the "Communist Manifesto" he's pointing to and then hurls to the ground in disgust? ;)
ROFLMAO OMG this was so unbeliavably funny. probably laughed way more than i should have
MajorisVYCanis 1 month ago
rofl this was so funny! I love the EUREKAAAAAAA!! Sadly, I think if I ever tried playing soccer with my friends, it would turn out like the beginning of this match. Except we wouldn't be coming up with great theories .
TheTalentedMrArashi 1 month ago
there's the ball there's the ball
sondano 1 month ago
lol Beckenbauer with the surprise inclusion
love4theHeart 2 months ago
This sort of Pythonesque brilliance is frenziedly and frantically ultra-brilligtastic compared with today's modern neo-post-modern dross and dribble.
johnloony 3 months ago
lmfao this is amazing
ekmad 3 months ago
damn that was way funnier than the sketch with the English noble inbred twits doing some sort of simplified Olympics culminating in suicide
CorvusCorone68 3 months ago
They cut away from the game and return in the second half. So, Socrates netted into the proper goal. A beautiful header it was.
oldweirdharold 4 months ago
but isn't that own goal? So the Germans win! Lol
PolyRetard 4 months ago
Sad thing is that this match is as about as exciting as soccer gets.
swatson999 6 months ago
Diogenes should be here, he would be a drunken nude guy, running across the field!
akoolman1 7 months ago 4
Reminds me of any Libertarian Party meeting I've ever been to :)
etzel33 7 months ago
I love this and what I love even more is that I understand why certain parts are funny. I almost feel proud of my self.
livingshadow29 7 months ago 3
It's a disgrace that Diogenes wasn't included in the Greek squad.
And how come has Nietzsche changed tops with Schelling?
stuqua 7 months ago
It must be a really old match, as I've heard that Marx played for various foreign teams. At the moment, he is the captain for the Chinese.
timfidotru 7 months ago 18
@timfidotru Definitely an old match. Nietzsche has since retired, and now hangs out at coffee shops with freshman philosophy majors.
jantoniello 7 months ago
That's obviously John Cleese (isn't it?) showing his great skills with the ball before kickoff. Well done, Sir! Who knew?
Tsip89 8 months ago
woudl be fun to see schopenhauer foul hagel lol and watch him walk away pretending nothing happened. also germs should score first and then have Marx score a own goal to make it more equal. i want a 90min match lol
Lucifer986 8 months ago
OFFSIDE!!!! Marx is right again
hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD 8 months ago
@hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD
STUDY HARDER
hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD 8 months ago
The germans needed more will to power!
asturrulumbo 8 months ago 4
i think that UREEEEKAAAAAAA! should be in more videos like this one XD
- python rules
Disfunctional20 8 months ago
i can see socrates' underwear !
1woody01 9 months ago
I love how after kick-off Beckenbauer is just standing around looking confused.
superpoweredrapist 9 months ago
How can you have theologians as linesmen it really is too much, the Germans should demand a replay.
DaveDodo007 9 months ago
wow, quite a sketch.
Renegen1 9 months ago
Foi o vídeo mais culto que vi no youtube!
abaaguiarsp 9 months ago
When I first saw this sketch, I wondered if the Greeks passing off the ball to one another was more or less a metaphor for how different Greek philosophical concepts and ideas coincided and supported one another.
tbussard 9 months ago 12
IH and TN have a point: humans need free will (or at least the illusion thereof) to thrive, as individualism plays a role in invention and the advancement of art and technology. Plato poses in his republic that the ideal state is a benevolent dictatorship, however this is a practical impossibility due to avarice and the instinct to ensure the well-being of blood relations before all others. As such, a perfect socialist state is an impossibility, as is a truly "benevolent" dictatorship.
kittykitty1987 10 months ago
@kittykitty1987 I completely agree. An ideal state of existence within a society is entirely subjective and an individual's interpretation of a Utopia is fulfilled by criteria that will never be completely, or even slightly ubiquitous. I am not at all Theistic, but what would happen if an exterior authority imposed free will on humanity overall? Does that not contradict the whole idea of human volition?
Prickler100 9 months ago
Comment removed
kittykitty1987 10 months ago
Marx is claiming an offsides, hahahahaha
sgtmcwallace 10 months ago
And Confucius say, "Name go in book"
AndRod29 10 months ago 3
Comment removed
weirdunclebob 10 months ago
Marx thinks it was everyones goal since the ball belongs to everyone.
TheBKenn 10 months ago
wouldn't bechanbaur (sp?) have thought of scoring first?
celinablack 11 months ago
Hahahahahahaha
All I've got to say!
UrbyKris 1 year ago
There is no 'r' at the end of "Nietzsche." Why do they pronounce it as "Neetcher?" I've always hated that. They say it that way in 'The Meaning of Life' also. It makes my ears bleed when they say it that way!
IggyHazard 1 year ago
@IggyHazard Because it's a German name and in the German language, one pronounces it so. "Neetcha." Porsche is also pronounced this way. We English speaking folk love to anglicise foreign words, don't we?! It's just too difficult to try pronouncing them the correct way... >.<
weirdunclebob 10 months ago
@weirdunclebob Our way is more correct than theirs. Western cultural supremacy uber alles!
}:-D
I mean really. Germans and Swiss are supposed to be smart but they can't even pronounce their own names right. An 'e' at the end is pronounced as a "schwa." 'W' is 'V'. It's retarded! Not as retarded as French, though. All those unnecessary unpronounced letters. They have the pompous aristocracy to thank for that. The language actually used to make more sense before they jacked it up.
IggyHazard 10 months ago
@IggyHazard I only read your first statement. Eastern Culture > Western Culture. (Modern day and historically)
theneenjah 10 months ago
@theneenjah Individualism pwns collectivism. Always. Any Westerner who betrays the ideals of individual liberty is a traitor to the West. Death to collectivism!
IggyHazard 10 months ago
@IggyHazard Well you're biased then :P And i'm saying culture wise. Like food, decor, martial arts, lifestyles, art, etc. Obviously I personally believe that East is better than West. Communism > Democracy.
theneenjah 10 months ago
@theneenjah All forms of bureaucratic collectivism and totalitarianism need to be exterminated with a clenched fist. State economies are for the weak. Only degenerate parasites actively seek for the government to rule over them. Only the most depraved masochists actively seek for their faces to be stomped by the iron-heeled jackboot of the state.
IggyHazard 10 months ago
@IggyHazard Biased. But what i'm saying is that communism is the perfect government system if human nature weren't as evil as it is :P
theneenjah 10 months ago
@theneenjah That's exactly the problem. It's too perfect. Perfection is oppressive. Under communism, there's no room for chaos. People need chaos because it liberates us.
IggyHazard 10 months ago
@IggyHazard Why does my fish burrito taste funky?
theneenjah 10 months ago
@weirdunclebob Even if it's intended to be pronounced "Neetcha," that still doesn't give English speaking peoples an excuse to jack it up even more by saying "Neetcher."
IggyHazard 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IggyHazard There's not really much difference between the two, is there, though? Unlike, say, my name pronounced by an Aussie/Pom compared to how someone from North America would pronounce it: Rob compared to Rarb. Fortunately, nobody over there called me Bob. It would sound like Barb which is short for Barbara, which I'm obviously not!. Being called 'Rarb' was bad enough!
weirdunclebob 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IggyHazard There's not really much difference between the two, is there, though? Unlike, say, my name pronounced by an Aussie/Pom compared to how someone from North America would pronounce it: Rob compared to Rarb. Fortunately, nobody over there called me Bob. It would sound like Barb which is short for Barbara, which I'm obviously not!. Being called 'Rarb' was bad enough!
weirdunclebob 10 months ago
'...and Marx is claiming it's offside.'
idSuperego 1 year ago
I would have loved to have seen the full English line up in the semi-finals? Locke was playing so well
soatesuk 1 year ago
@soatesuk
As is usually the case with England, they'd probably keep it tied up only to lose on penalty supositions.
=3
EXRazeBurn 10 months ago
Socrates was from Brazil and smoked 80 cigs a day. Still the best player not to win a WC!
soatesuk 1 year ago
@soatesuk And a doctor!
KaiserTota 1 year ago
the most inspired sketch of ALL TIME!!! yes. thats right. i said ALL TIME.
lachlunn 1 year ago
"Ooohh, if that had gone in the back of the net it would've been a goal". - David Coleman. British philosopher (and sometime sports announcer).
mycal64 1 year ago
This is more interesting and exciting than real footy.
snipeefox 1 year ago
Full Marx. Should have shown him the Red Card!
simonsaysjapan 1 year ago
i love monty python.
robertoproz 1 year ago
Marx was correct. All could be achieved with High Technology and space exploration.
cris750 1 year ago
Marx was correct.
cris750 1 year ago 4
@cris750 i'd agree if i understoon the offside rule.
lachlunn 1 year ago
"There's the ball, there's the ball."
JagoFive 1 year ago
I'd be an avid football fan if it was like this.
fishpeeps 1 year ago
Marx was right afterall
MrrGrave 1 year ago 4
It seems Marx was right... It was offside.
Coala8D 1 year ago 4
It was folly on Germany's part to omit Marx. Clearly a costly mistake.
Corkranger85 1 year ago
is Beckenbauer actually playing?
Sanisaninja 1 year ago
...and Marx claims it was offside :p
GSJacket 1 year ago 3
Watching Marx 'warm up' was probably the funniest thing I've seen in months.
I fucking love Monty Python.
Mayokitty7 1 year ago 2
there's the ball!
pingchu29 1 year ago
that greek was offside !
wielblond12 1 year ago
its interesting people are being surprised by the quality of the comments on a "philosophy" video.
NewBaldwin 1 year ago
Every time I watch this, I wonder WTH Beckenbauer didn't simply get the ball and score as many goals as he'd want... He didn't have to get an "Eureka" to know what to do...
Robi2009 1 year ago
Philosopher's football is simple. Men chase the ball and in the end Socrates scores.
Louhila 1 year ago
Nietzsche and Hegel would actually have a major run-in after a few seconds of discussion. *g* And there is NO way anyone else than the great Socrates could score in a philosophy match. :)
thtben 1 year ago
Yep Socrates is indeed offside, I guess this is why we need video replays
damuffinmanzzz 1 year ago 4
I don't know why the line "He beats Hegel" makes me laugh, but it does.
tugboat2030 1 year ago
Quality, Love the Ref and Linesmen.
ATOMICSYNTHMAN 1 year ago
I can see why the Greeks made Heraclitus their Captain.... if anyone make a game flow (Panta Rei), it's him.
Loobs666 1 year ago
what a lovely intelligent comments page. I may come back here more often purely for the company. :)
SamWycombe 1 year ago
isnt it wonderful, on the comments for this video people are quoting philosophy and are being intellectual and there is nobody making stupid arguments like there normally would be,thank you pythons,thank you for making youtube a more intellectual place.
dexterccf2 1 year ago 44
No, its a victory for Archimedes because actually doing something is common sense. Marx was brought into the lineup and - nothing happens, what a shame. The joke is that the Germans' arguments are based on their philosophies and in Marx's cause it isn't to argue what reality is but to argue the rules are unfair, but in the end its all the same result - Greeks win! Greeks win!
offpathtrace 1 year ago 4
The Germans could put out some team of composers as well... what a people.
seanreillyireland 1 year ago
There's the ball, there's the ball.....
gbraae 1 year ago 2
the best thing about this sketch is that Marx claims it was offside (which it was), whilst all the other philosophers are busy spouting lofty conceptual debate. A victory for the common sense of Marx.
eraserhead321 1 year ago 52
Comment removed
grydholtutube 1 year ago
@eraserhead321 I think you´ve got a wonderful insight here, dude. It´s something I would never think about.
daonap 9 months ago
@eraserhead321 It's true, because communism is a simple aspect and common sense would dictate that it is a perfectly logical outcome to having a utopia of a government. But Human nature makes communism corrupt, because man kind itself is corrupt, and always wants more. Nobody is content with mediocrity, and everyone has a competitive spirit to excel past the person to his left or right whether he can or cant.
wheregarbl 9 months ago
@wheregarbl very true... but the irony is communism would make everyone better off, happier and dare I say it... richer! By which I mean it's a more stable economic system that nurtures growth in business.
eraserhead321 9 months ago
@eraserhead321 I have never been a great fan of communism because it destroys the one characteristic that links us with animals- the survival of the fittest. In capitalism the clever and talented become rich and live better lives. The less talented do not, and so in this loose definition don't 'survive' (of course in a literal sense they do). I don't believe in the philosophy that those who have worked hard to attain their talent or knowledge should give it up for others who lacked such a drive.
jammakane10 8 months ago
@jammakane10
I consider myself being a communist... Being communist is not to kill everything you call drive but to maintain a society for everybody... besides not knowing what communism stands for you also lack the knowledge about Darwin and his theory of evolution... pity.... fair enough not to be a communist... but try and get your facts straight concerning evolution... had to act on this
hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD 8 months ago
@hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD I am not as talented a writer as Karl Marx or Charles Darwin so I apologise that I have not been able to go in completely in depth in my discussion of both of these concepts with the constraints of 500 characters. I do have a thorough knowledge of Darwin's 'The Evolution of Species'; I studied it in English Literature after all. I find it rather condescending that you assume I do not know about either of these concepts just because I only outlined my argument.
jammakane10 8 months ago
@jammakane10 that said marx should be recognised for his ratonale behind it which was to provide an alternative to capitalism that didnt reslt in worker exploitation even thoughof course the applied version DID result in it. , that said our system isnt pure capitalism either, nor was it back in the 19th century.
but my guess is that a sstem thats the best is somewhere in between thats flui with capitalism to provide that drivebut also possesses a sytem protectings rights of workers etc.
elgostine 5 months ago
@elgostine System!
undertherainbow100 1 month ago
@hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD If you were to meet me in real life and we would have a more thorough discussion of these concepts. Until then, try not to insult people and thus show your own lack of common intelligence.
jammakane10 8 months ago
@hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD
BUHU
hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD 8 months ago
@jammakane10
STUDY HARDER
hasjkdhlsjakDHLASJKD 8 months ago
@wheregarbl communism would not work for the simple reason that Marx used building material from the capitalist with its flaws and all so even if communism appears drastic different its still defective exactly how capitalism is defective. Also i don't think any political theory accept fascism and dictatorship can be taken seriously in a post modern world, we have computers that changes EVERYTHING it also changes existentialism
Lucifer986 8 months ago
@eraserhead321 He should have called for Socially Necessary Injury Time.
TreachMarkets 6 months ago
@TreachMarkets ha ha. nice :)
eraserhead321 6 months ago
Wow! A football game without vuvuzelas!
Knifyman 1 year ago
Who's the one actual footballer?
Android2137 1 year ago
@Android2137 Beckenbauer in the German team.
somegooner 1 year ago
Archimedes was the best on this match, well any match, he was in favour of what became the scientific principle to investigate the natural world. Plato has been too strong in the West for too long, his idealism is just plain stupid. A good touch here is that Confucius is the judge, as he was in favour of family and order.
Simpson654 1 year ago 6
This is genious.
vef444 1 year ago
Robert Alexy would claim the rule is invalid,cause it's inefficient, as it differs from an erga omni sense of moral interpretation.
Would have been helpful :P
guilhermefreire48 1 year ago
it's actually more interesting than regular soccer
doctorwhom1 1 year ago 2
LMAO this is awesome and hillarious
ViperRob42 1 year ago
our magnificent 2004 european cup winner had of course a german coach.
johnwaynewasafaggot 1 year ago
haha "Name go in bock"
eksadiss 1 year ago
German philosophers against Greek philosophers in a soccer match....
Who else than Monty Python could think of something SO stupidly silly, and still make you ROFL 30 years after making it... It's incredible, simply XD
aneri97 1 year ago 3
Hahaha .... and Marx was claiming it was offside!
What a Line!
jmalone555 1 year ago
isnt beckenbauer a soccer player. Guess that WOULD be a bit of a surprise in a match like this
ProgDrummerQ 1 year ago
Does anyone know what happened to J. G. Fichte?...was he injured?
ChandradharSharma 1 year ago 2
Damn,I thought the positioning of Socrates as sweeper would be a great impediment to the Greek team,not to mention that Marx failed to bring the Germans to par with the Greeks.I DEMAND A METAPHORICAL REMATCH!
ItalkYoulistenOk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i don't know all the rules of the philosophers' game in detail. the crucial question is: was socrates, my favorite bras... greek philosopher really offsides? if he was, i'd strongly recommend the Filosofers In Fight Association to change this rule. as DrFugue said, "if the dribbler with the ball has already beaten the last defender, there is not such thing as offsides".
i know karl marx was so right in so many ways, this time he wasn't. or at least he shouldn't be right.
loserswin783 1 year ago
commentor when Wittgenstein was about to get subbed off:
"Wittgenstein went to see his auntie last week"
Could someone explain this joke to me please?
superstar122251 1 year ago
@superstar122251 I guess its just poking fun at how regular sports announcers will throw in some background information when a pivotal decision like a substitution is made in-game
OhHerro50 1 year ago
Marx was right... Socrates was offside.
firearsenal54 1 year ago 5
Socrates was OFFSIDE! lol
kolishnikov74 1 year ago 6
genius... just... brilliant
music4meh 1 year ago
What's funny about Confucius saying "name go in book"?
Basehad 1 year ago
I love that Hegel is the captain of the Germans.
TynansAnger 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"and Marx is claiming he was offside." Materialism ftw :D
moxito1 1 year ago
remove Beckenbauer and add Stirner.He would not pass the ball around but he could dribble like a god :P.
moxito1 1 year ago
I love this skit. The first time I saw it I laughed so hard.
gamer025 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Theres so many girls over at tiny[dot]cc/whores607
FanajiQidodu 2 years ago
Alguém tinha que ter pelo menos uma idéia kkk
Vande1610 2 years ago
How was Socrates offside?
klank99 2 years ago
@klank99 As you can see, Socrates is ahead of Archimedes, and infront of all the germans. Pretty clear offside
KKiwistone 2 years ago 2
actually, if the dribbler with the ball has already beaten the last defender, there is not such thing as offsides, archimedes had already gotten past the last guy, so it doesn't matter where Socrates is, he is onsides no matter what.
DrFugue 2 years ago 4
@DrFugue
Plus, the use of a priori arguments only apply in your own half
Stanfordcounty 1 year ago 3
@DrFugue I thought the rule was you had to be behind the ball... Socrates was in front of the ball and therefore offside.
firearsenal54 1 year ago
so we can learn : marx was actually right :P
DamageIINC 2 years ago
Socrates was actully offside !!
broadmore 2 years ago
"and Marx is claiming he was offside."
mercapri302 2 years ago 8
haha beckenbauer is only there because of all of his quotes in german magazines and the press... he talks so much BS that it's almost philosophical
LuanO7 2 years ago 4
This reminded me when Antartica played Siberia in the same tournament in an earlier tie...both sides were so niave they played football for the whole 90 minutes! What a meaningless,boring game! The match ended in a pointless 4-4 draw.
Thank God.,if he exists,for two classic sides like these two here.
BillDFC 2 years ago 3
I love seeing Nietzsche getting into a conflict with the refs, fairly appropriate.
Linkster2o 2 years ago 3
We needed Khan. (smile)
denisesf5 2 years ago
socrates WAS offsides
69chevysrule 2 years ago 5
i love this video wittgenstien gets substituted for Karl marx
RiddlesGhost 2 years ago
there's beckenbauer
haha
wallavious 2 years ago 3
this is quite an interesting way of playing sport
ItStartsWithL 2 years ago 5
thats funny !
ironjohnlad 2 years ago 2
This is one version of futebol where Brazil wouldn't dominate. With due respect to the philosophers of Brazil, they don't have a very strong team.
Guaguanco11 2 years ago 12
What philosophers?
Shadowhog 2 years ago
The only one I know is Walter Carnielli who is a top class logician. But maybe they get to include Socrates in their team who obtained a degree in philosophy after his retirement from futebol.
Guaguanco11 2 years ago 2
@Guaguanco11 of course, brazil is a very young country, these philosophers are from a time where Brazil didn't exist, and I could say more 10 things but i'm tired
PedroSimoesBR 1 year ago
This is amazing.
TimMegrelidze 2 years ago 4
..and socrates...socrates scores!!
turbokush69 2 years ago 3
Name go in Box
tehpevis 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
tehpevis 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
boring.
TeseHar 2 years ago
"...accused Confucious of having no free will"
LAWL.
Mayokitty7 2 years ago 21
haha "aristotle very much the man in form" gotta love those philosophy in-jokes
ppen2723 2 years ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
TOPEUROGOALS(.)COM top football skill goals
SandsUYCnodal 2 years ago
The Germans are disputing it. Hegel is arguing that the reality is merely an a priori adjunct of non-naturalistic ethics, Kant via the categorical imperative is holding that ontologically it exists only in the imagination, and Marx is claiming it was offside...Fucking genius. lmfao!!
dontsmokewithoutme 2 years ago 101
Fucking genius indeed!!
Otispuss2 2 years ago
yeah, offsides killed me!
cagv818 2 years ago 2
@dontsmokewithoutme pish
LordInksworth 1 year ago
@dontsmokewithoutme ...and Marx is claiming it was offsides. Fucking brilliant. haha
xsvdudex 1 year ago
@dontsmokewithoutme And, for once, Marx is right.
loqutor 1 year ago 4
The Greeks are still lacking any proof that this goal wasn't just a mere image of self-projected sensory experiences deriving from the faculty of transcendental imagination thus stripping the goal of any manifestation in our reality!
SchwarzundWeis 2 years ago 63
man, are you a philosopher?
Alchrat 2 years ago
how do you want to make sure, that this self-projected sensory as you call it is not the proof itself for the real manifestation itself? i think that is what a supporter of materialism would argue
ElAurian 2 years ago 2
But where are the Germans getting their motivation from to argue its no goal in the first place? Confucius awarding the goal is an act no less or more real than the ball finding the back of the net. For the Germans to argue no goal, they have to testify to the reality of Confucius awarding the goal. You can't deny the goal's reality, and yet accept the reality of Confucius' awarding it.
Either accept both, or deny both. And if it's the latter you choose, then theres nothing to argue about LOL
lickdeznuts 2 years ago 33
Q.E.D.
Guaguanco11 2 years ago 4
@lickdeznuts my thinker box hurts
gotbannedbefore 10 months ago
@SchwarzundWeis They don't need to prove it because it is an accepted maxim, a basic truth requiring no proof necessary for any arguement, for without maxims it is impossible to answer any question, and a debate as simple as whether or not to order extra cheese on your pizza will leave you completely insane, wiggling in outraged annoyance like an octopus caught in lava.
superlardbucket 1 year ago 5
@superlardbucket hey, i just copied and pasted a guys post before just to get the most thumbs up as possible. we humans have so simple motives, especially on youtube :-)
SchwarzundWeis 1 year ago
Exelente ! ;gracias ,desde argentina.
bellinivernon 2 years ago
lmao, just amazing comedy genius
GLH09 2 years ago
Hahaha, Oh God, I just wish I understood more about the philosophers to understand this better. One day I will come back and get all of the jokes I missed :P
Rko180 2 years ago 7
I love Marx chasing after the referee arguing the call! Is that the "Communist Manifesto" he's pointing to and then hurls to the ground in disgust? ;)
TSM8088 2 years ago