@Likeaperv Of course it is, if you sell yourself. People often did that in the old days, to pay off a debt, secure a future for their family, raise money for a church etc. Likewise you could often work your way out of slavery, or just sell yourself into slavery for 5 years or something - and for some it's a sexual fetish too!
@bigglyguy slavery in "sex" its a rol, a game. your are misunderstanding the slavery term, slavery isnt about earning something to pay debts, slaves dont get paid. They are forced.
@Likeaperv If you SELL yourself into slavery then you already got paid, geddit? As for sexual roles, some do indeed take their slavery, or master relationship, very seriously and make it a lifestyle.
@bigglyguy dude slave and servant are 2 diferent things, you are describing a servant not a Slave, and rols in relationships has nothing to do with slavery. a slave is forced and are treated as property to be bought and sold.
@Likeaperv Read. my. lips. If. you. SELL. yourself. then. it. is. slavery. OK, let's Google it, shall we? Do a search, including the quotation marks, so that you get an exact match, ie those words, in that order on each page - "sold himself into slavery". I get over 55,000 results. From the 1st result: "The normal word for "slave" in the New Testament is the term dou'lo", a term that in earlier centuries usually referred to one who sold himself into slavery..." Believe me now?
@bigglyguy you are right, some people did voluntary, I havent heard that before, I always thought they were always forced to do so because they were rapted, or were people treated like inferior beings e.g. outcasts, prioners, enemies, etc. I had in mind a slave like one of those. However I thing its inmoral.
@bigglyguy well, we agreed that slavery means you lose your freedom right?, if its well treated doesnt change the fact that you are a pertenence of other person, so the owner its doing something wrong. Now, the slave, well if he/she does it for a good reason (save his/her faminly/loved ones) he/she may have no choise, so, I think its not inmoral.
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
God made Adam in his image.Adam was imperfect. He was led to immorality.The only logical answer is God is imperfect too.Perfection could never create imperfection,because that action alone causes God to be imperfect.
If you reject Christ you have made your choice for eternal separation from God for eternity. There are no second chances and no escaping hell after you face the judgement of God.
These atheist people are being used by demons to gather more people for eternal damnation.
@merkal90000 You do know that hell was a later concept that was added in right? And the judgement was directly taken from the Egyptians where their god of death wold judge your soul. I know you feel your identity is being challenged but please open your eyes and look for answers outside the bible.
I would forgive you, and save you, even if you don't worship or believe that I even exist. The Lord GOD has personally revealed to all of humanity in their hearts that if you accept a lie with pure conviction of ill-will, you have made your eternably regretful choice, and so torment will follow you forever. It is best to repent and accept true goodness and truth before you die, and find out satan lied you into selling your soul to its invisible creature. idol books
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Even non-religious people know this.
The homosexual agenda is not good for anyone, including those who consider themselves "gay".
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfully framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
After receiving two abusive messages here on Youtube, I thought I'd take some time today to spread around my joy at how 1GodOnly1 has revealed his true nature. Just for making simple, civil comments offering a counter view, he blocked me (under two different user names) AND called me a "shit bag troll". So, for anyone who enjoys seeing true colors expressed, there ya go. For those who 'like' him, well, what do you think now?
If we were created by a god that "gave us a moral compass" we'd all agree on what is and isn't moral, but we don't. Morality wouldn't have changed over time, but it has. Slavery, a rape victim having to marry her rapist, stoning to death disobedient children and people who work on the sabbath, etc., were okay in the christian bible, but most people find those things abhorrent today.
One question that is blatantly obvious, but for some reason always skips the theists narrow minded viewpoint is this... If god gave us an innate moral sense, then why did we need the 10 commandments allegedly immortalized in stone tablets? Shouldn't they be a natural inclination that supersede conscious thought irrespective of social environment?
"I personally believe slavery is absolutely reprehensible & immoral."
Douche;
"But in a Godless universe there is no immoral."
Matt;
"Right! I agree! The universe is dead empty space! It doesn't give a shit about slavery! Only individuals & societies do!"
Douche;
"... yeah but there is no morality so how-"
Lol! Fuck me, whoever came up with this bullshit argument from Objective Morality needed a foot up their crack. They really set us back a couple of centuries.
Tracie seems like one of those chicks that would cut her hair even though you told her chicks with super short hair dont turn you on... but you fuck her anyway.
@aegisgfx its not that simple. many ppl who do bad things and it makes them feel good. the could kill someone and try to justify it. i've seen them do this. this is why morality has to be absolute. not everyone naturally does what right as u can see with all the crime that goes on.
@aegisgfx The question is WHY do you feel good when you do good to others and WHY do you feel bad when you do bad to others. The best explanation is GOD
@aegisgfx When we go about seeking the truth, we might not KNOW 100% but we go with the most plausible explanation. And unless you can give me a better one ITS GOD
LOL lets fill in the blanks with MAGIC. hahahaha. And since I am not a biochemist, I don't have all the answers but I'm sure if you read up on a little bit of Sam Harris, you'll see there are plenty of scientific answers for how morality manifests that do not require your 'invisible friend' or 'magic'. Now fuck off christian idiot. Go somewhere else to peddle your snake oil bullshit.
@mas03 a cosmic jewish zombie that sacrificed himself to himself to circumvent a rule he created? you can't think of anything more plausible than that? you are scary.
@mas03: No, you feel good because what we call love (motherly love, sexual etc.), friendship etc. rewards us with endorphines and the like which make us feel "good" as opposed to, say, the pain we feel when we are getting hurt or the hunger/existencial fear when we are on our own when kicked out of a group because we did something "bad" (even some animal groups cast out adults who mistreat the youngs of the group for example). That's nature's concept to make us do what is best to survive.
@aegisgfx But some people feel good doing things most of us could agree with is wrong. I personally ask myself "Do I negatively affect another by my actions, or even myself?" or "Would I approve if I was the recipient of my actions?" That's a good way to tell right from logic...logic and putting yourself in anothers shoes.
Yes, but some people are incapable of logic, mentally ill people for example. And the problems of mental illness are compounded exponentially when you add religion to the mix, because instead of seeking help for their problems, they might think its 'god' talking to them telling to go on a shooting rampage or drown all their kids.
You need to give up this moronic notion that gods are real, in order to grow you have to give up your irrational beliefs. Do you think as a child you could have ever grown up if you never stopped believing in Santa Claus?
@aegisgfx As an atheist, if you're consistent, you don't really believe I have the free-will to give up any beliefs -- or that there is an objective moral imperative for me to grow up, be rational or believe/behave one way or another -- or that there's even any REAL value in doing anything (like giving up my theism). Your invective works against you.
@Nalenec As a consistent atheist, I think free will is part of a false dilemma, sure. But I do think there is such a thing as objective morality, because all morality - secular or otherwise - is by definition a code of behavior intended to maximize benefit and minimize suffering. The only thing "subjective" about it is that an effective moral code is also dependent on the specifics of human nature, which is a fluid and complex thing.
@YaleBreaker There can only be an objective morality if "morality" itself can be objectively defined and agreed upon. (i.e. saying to "maximize benefit" is not an objective definition as peoples views on what the definition of "benefit" is are subjective).
Moreover, even if we could objectively define what you call "morality" does not mean everyone will agree. You are describing the consequentialist school of thought, but there are other views also.
@66tomm99 This is why I compared objective morality to hunger. You're on a mysterious island with a bunch of people. You're all hungry, but you want to eat different things and conflicts result. You work out how to distribute the food so everyone can be approximately happy.
There are subjective elements to morality, yes, but the foundation is objective: hunger exists. That's what I mean when I say "objective morality"; not that one size fits all, but that people need a size in the first place.
@YaleBreaker I don't really get your analogy. What is the objective foundation of morality that you mention? I honestly can't think of anything about morality that is objective and that everyone agrees on...
@66tomm99 Most, if not all, of us have inbuilt drives seeking safety, survival, resource acquisition, mates. With more of a stretch, intellectual fulfillment (i.e. not boredom), bonds of family or friendship. In a social setting, we need to personally and mutually control our behaviors in order to more effectively achieve these needs. To me, morality is any code - written, unwritten, spoken or unspoken - that we develop to facilitate that control, and by extension, those achievements.
@YaleBreaker To me at least, by you saying "it is any code" suggests it to be not objective. I agree to an extent we develop a morality for those things however that morality carries on developing and changing depending on the views of the people who abide by it, which means it is utterly subjective.
@66tomm99 It's those terms "subjective" and "objective", I guess.
As far as I can tell, if - for instance - we have a society of people who value their lives, and someone kills someone else for no particular reason, that is objectively immoral - even though the particulars of the moral code are based on subjective criteria.
In the end, though, I just don't see the fuss about "objective" morality. It should be "what works", not what's "woven into the fabric of the universe", you know?
I really don't get why people make this morality issue so difficult. I know some are stupid people who have doorknobs for brains, but even smart and decent people have this odd assumption that authority must dictate what is "good". It opens far more problems than it answers. I don't get how you can be satisfied in any way with "because he says so" without adding the unavoidable problem that "he" won't/ can't communicate and indistinguishable from a mute, invisible, timeless transcendent radish.
You can say you have your "own" moral standards, but that doesn't determine whether morals were inherently built into you or not. If they were, then they were; if not then where did they come from? If they exist as a function of survival, what is so good about "this" life, and why should we not kill/steal/lie to achieve the most pleasure out of our short time?
@Qgolfman For saying that, you prove you yourself have no morals. It's perfectly simple; killing someone is bad because no one wants to die at another's hands. A death affects many people; friends, family, ect. If one is responsible for another's death then the one respnsible mustbe held accountable by the justice system. No need for some supernatural overkill dumbass.
@NUTCASE71733 But that still assumes that all people are operating on some standard, because they realize death is inherently wrong...Still, in my opinion, you wittle down human life to whether or not one wishes to continue existing, but fail to make any progress on our actual state of existence. In other words, you say you want to continue living, but have not provided a good reason for doing so
@Qgolfman someone will kill/steal/lie it right back from you,even people with mental disabilities can do those things.the best genes for survival would not get passed down.on a even playing field with rules and laws,i believe i can perform better then you and get more perks from life that will be protected by the government and stay in my possession.what makes me think that?ego.any wealth i save can be passed down to my children.people are still just as ruthless as if they kill/steal/lie.
Really, folks, is the mono sound bugging you that much? It's not a stereophonic musical extravaganza, it's just people talking, so who cares if it's only in one speaker? Geesh...what about the CONTENT of the show? That's much more important. Also, since none of us is paying to see this video, nobody has the right to snipe at VeninGriffe for not having time to fix the video. Get over it! (Man, sometimes YouTubers are the most annoying, whiny, spoiled little drips on the planet!)
this caller is thick as pig shit. hes not even listening to the explanations of matt and tracie. he isnt trying to figure out anything, hes just trying to push the point that god created morals. fucking hate people who replace their ears with mouths.
@brochill69 I didnt say science can't explain something but that it can't explain everything. Everything can probably be explained, but what is everything anyway? And what is truth? Truth is just a consept, like love and hate. But when you say that science can do everything, dont you think you say that nothing is impossible and thereby anything could be? Science needs to be very humble in that way and not deny everything THEY cant explain. Remember that words are just consepts in your mind...
@jorgebe87 Truth is more than a concept. There are certain truths to the universe that are demonstrable and can be shown to someone and proven in a realm where their version of truth is quite different than your own. Words aren't just concepts, they stir them in your mind. This doesn't for a second shake the truths of science. Science needs to be humble? LOL Tell that to the religious who truly think the, "creator of the universe cares for me!"
@jorgebe87 No they are not just concepts. Are you high or something? Truth is something which is based on corroborative evidence and facts. It's not just a concept. If you can't distinguish between a concept and truth, then you need to go back to school. You're right when you say that that science needs to be humble since that's what makes it much more rational and productive in comparison to religion. But by you saying that something is unachievable by science with given time is pure ignorance
@jorgebe87 The term ridiculous means deserving of ridicule. This garbage is a example of the term. Science needs to be humble? How do we go about humbling science? This makes no sense at all! I think you should study more than you listen to others. Find and research a few things in any scientific field then ask yourself how do I make this more humble. Reminds me of my alter ego/personality. You peepoe better be humbling science or gawd will burn your azz up in hell. His gloryhole is so loving
@LowdenFretter Both science and religion is trying to explain what's going on. What people seem to don't understand is that the world is arbitrary and that these are just maps of reality. And some maps can cast light on sides of life that other maps wont. Its just a matter of where you put YOUR faith which is not in the hands of anyone but YOU!
@jorgebe87 But science DOES explain what is going on with demonstrable and corroborative proof. Religion is in no way equivalent to science at all. Science is not faith-based by any means. It is based on fact and is realistic evidence. Faith is not wanting to know what is true which directly contradicts science. By lumping science and religion into the same category, you have just proven how nonsensical your way of thinking is. No offense, just stating the truth.
@brochill69 I can agree on that there is a difference between science and religion and that faith is a more essential part of religion. BUT science can't explain everything and it has a very limited way of thinking. I see it more like a method for breaking the barriers of space and time. And shure hell, it works! But there are questions and sides of nature that science cannot explain and simply ignores them because there are no mysteries to science, it can all be explained.
@jorgebe87 But how can YOU say that science cannot explain something? Just because it can't be explained in this day and age, doesn't mean it will not be explained in the future. To say that something is not achievable by science is ignorant. For example, people used to think that it would be impossible to fly in the sky and only the "gods" possess that power but thanks to science, we have obtained the knowledge and technology on how to do so. Science has the ability to learn anything with time
@12InchesUnBuffed Its definitely not common sense to disprove god since there is a large percentage who have had religious and spiritual experiences. This is understandably enough difficult for a person who have never had such an experience to understand.
@EVERYONE The question of whether or not god exists is in bad taste. It has been an endless argument for different paradigms. Both religion and science, as institutions, tells us that they have the perfect map of seeing the world from. This is fucking arrogant from both sides. I think religion explains things that science don't understand and take for granted. So forget ideology, they betray! We need to acknowledge all kinds of paradigms and not get stuck to one and make war with the others!
@jorgebe87 The truth is, some paradigms ARE better than others - more useful, easier to back up, more coherent with the rest of what you know. So while I'd do what you say in the name of tolerance, I feel that it'd be misleading to myself if I handled all ideologies as equal when I know that they are not. (Any paradigm, not just religion/science.)
@jorgebe87 I don't think that science tells you that they have a perfect map - they just tell you what they think they know and, hey, you can go and test it. It says nothing about most unknowable things.
@jorgebe87 Religion doesn't 'explain' anything. Religion isn't in the business of explaining. Religion is in the business of faith and faith is just another way of saying you have no good reason to believe something.
I don't quite agree with her that morality is relative to society. What if a particular society believes that rape is okay? Does that magically make it all right? I don't think so. Babies being born into that society are not choosing to be born into a society which allows rape!
I agree with Sam Harris that moral claims are claims about the well-being of conscious creatures.
Sure, they might say I'm wrong, but what does it matter? Creationists claim that evolution isn't real, but again that's irrelevant.
The idea behind morality is simple. If I left my house right now and kicked a rock, it wouldn't matter. But if I kicked a cat, we're talking about something entirely different. Why? Because cats are conscious creatures capable of suffering.
As Sam Harris says, moral claims are just claims about the well-being of conscious creatures.
It's even more basic than that. When you leave your house to kick a rock, you wouldn't want me to come in and steal all your stuff. You can find a bunch of people who are willing to give up their "right" to steal stuff in exchange for not getting stuff stolen and agree to punish those who do. Same goes for killing and in any society (human or animal) where animals live together, such moral rules evolved because groups where they did were more succesful than those where they didn't
OMG THAT SPAGHETTI MONSTER IN THE BACKGROUND MUST BE PROOF OF GOD O.O oh wait, thats a spaghetti monster. completely explainable, radiation, octopi, and italy. score one science, zero bible (Bib-ly)
Ramen to coolvideo28 the Cookie Monster (peace be upon Him) is one of the praise prophets of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which the Flying Spaghetti Monster created us. Be blessed by his noodly appendage, as he boiled his noodly appendage to cleanse our sin. =)
"It's absolutely wrong to me" is meaningless. It can't be absolutely wrong, but only wrong to one person. It must be absolutely wrong to all people. You COULD say it's absolutely wrong but only I can see it.
@Redfingers Check out stefbot on youtube. He has an interesting logical argument for Universal ethics. I'm still trying to wrap my head around it but it's worth a read.
I'm not saying you can't say "it's absolutely wrong," I'm saying that the statement "it's absolutely wrong to me" is meaningless. It can be absolutely wrong, but only to you? If it's only wrong to you it's not absolutely wrong. It's a contradiction.
@Redfingers Yes we would have to define what is meant by absolutely? There may be a way to say that something is logically wrong for everyone in regards to morality.
"If it's only wrong to you it's not absolutely wrong" Is that an absolutely right statement or just to you?
If you mean it can apply differently to different people when you say absolutely, that's not absolutely in the traditional sense, that's subjectively, which is a direct contradiction to the traditional definition and redundant considering he already said that it was wrong "to me."
Of course I can't exactly define the term for him, he didn't define it, so I have to assume, and that's what I think he said, rightly or wrongly.
@Redfingers To say something cannot be verifiability true or false unless all people are in agreement is just stupid. Things can be proven or disproven by less than the majority, and are often done so be only a single person. I have shredded your dopey argument. Next time, try using you brain instead of your mouth, half-wit.
Matt - you better let me finish or i swear i'm gonna hang up on your ass
Cameron - i don't care
Matt - *hangs up on Cameron* me neither
Tracie - see if you don't care if you survive, it doesn't matter
A+!
youthank8 1 week ago
Matt dilahunty is rights. Thanks to him many idiots will finaly wake up from this anestezic religion caused by a filthy god virus.
gigihentz1 2 weeks ago
Athists are gonna survive!!
fadechicobuarque1989 2 weeks ago
that caller needs to blow brains out geez
americanliberal09 2 weeks ago
Morality is made possible by mirror neurons. Pure and simple. Why do people need to find spooky reasons for it?
MarkRosengarten 3 weeks ago
Is it survival what are you looking for... ( :P )
or it isnt. Priceless.
Likeaperv 4 weeks ago
I'd like to say that pastafarianism is the best religious ethical system ever!!!:D
R'amen:)
ProDegiaque 4 weeks ago
@ProDegiaque R'men brother. May those who would bare ill will towards others boil in a marinara hell.
SonOfNye 4 weeks ago
Slavery is moral if voluntary...
bigglyguy 4 weeks ago
@bigglyguy if voluntary then isnt slavery...
Likeaperv 4 weeks ago
@Likeaperv Of course it is, if you sell yourself. People often did that in the old days, to pay off a debt, secure a future for their family, raise money for a church etc. Likewise you could often work your way out of slavery, or just sell yourself into slavery for 5 years or something - and for some it's a sexual fetish too!
bigglyguy 3 weeks ago
@bigglyguy slavery in "sex" its a rol, a game. your are misunderstanding the slavery term, slavery isnt about earning something to pay debts, slaves dont get paid. They are forced.
Likeaperv 3 weeks ago
@Likeaperv If you SELL yourself into slavery then you already got paid, geddit? As for sexual roles, some do indeed take their slavery, or master relationship, very seriously and make it a lifestyle.
bigglyguy 3 weeks ago
@bigglyguy dude slave and servant are 2 diferent things, you are describing a servant not a Slave, and rols in relationships has nothing to do with slavery. a slave is forced and are treated as property to be bought and sold.
Likeaperv 3 weeks ago
@Likeaperv Read. my. lips. If. you. SELL. yourself. then. it. is. slavery. OK, let's Google it, shall we? Do a search, including the quotation marks, so that you get an exact match, ie those words, in that order on each page - "sold himself into slavery". I get over 55,000 results. From the 1st result: "The normal word for "slave" in the New Testament is the term dou'lo", a term that in earlier centuries usually referred to one who sold himself into slavery..." Believe me now?
bigglyguy 3 weeks ago
@bigglyguy you are right, some people did voluntary, I havent heard that before, I always thought they were always forced to do so because they were rapted, or were people treated like inferior beings e.g. outcasts, prioners, enemies, etc. I had in mind a slave like one of those. However I thing its inmoral.
Likeaperv 3 weeks ago
@Likeaperv Firstly, congratulations for admitting error. That takes honor. Why immoral if voluntary and the buyer treats them well?
bigglyguy 3 weeks ago
@bigglyguy well, we agreed that slavery means you lose your freedom right?, if its well treated doesnt change the fact that you are a pertenence of other person, so the owner its doing something wrong. Now, the slave, well if he/she does it for a good reason (save his/her faminly/loved ones) he/she may have no choise, so, I think its not inmoral.
Likeaperv 2 weeks ago
@bigglyguy xD
MountainPeak11 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
boywhoy88 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
boywhoy88 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
boywhoy88 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
boywhoy88 4 weeks ago
God is a God of love. He only punishes those who do wrong. All who do wrong will pay. God is the ultimate judge. Seek Jesus Christ today to escape God's harsh judgement for sinners, who are all people. Jesus Christ gives us the power to stop sinning if we trust in him with all our heart. He is waiting.
boywhoy88 4 weeks ago
God made Adam in his image.Adam was imperfect. He was led to immorality.The only logical answer is God is imperfect too.Perfection could never create imperfection,because that action alone causes God to be imperfect.
imamyt1 1 month ago
If you reject Christ you have made your choice for eternal separation from God for eternity. There are no second chances and no escaping hell after you face the judgement of God.
These atheist people are being used by demons to gather more people for eternal damnation.
merkal90000 1 month ago
@merkal90000 You do know that hell was a later concept that was added in right? And the judgement was directly taken from the Egyptians where their god of death wold judge your soul. I know you feel your identity is being challenged but please open your eyes and look for answers outside the bible.
TheDreadedlife 1 month ago
@merkal90000 I'll Slap you silly
ventura433 1 month ago
@merkal90000
I would forgive you, and save you, even if you don't worship or believe that I even exist. The Lord GOD has personally revealed to all of humanity in their hearts that if you accept a lie with pure conviction of ill-will, you have made your eternably regretful choice, and so torment will follow you forever. It is best to repent and accept true goodness and truth before you die, and find out satan lied you into selling your soul to its invisible creature. idol books
letsomethingshine 1 month ago
@merkal90000 Dude..you clearly have no idea of anything outside the bible
KeySour 1 month ago
@merkal90000 take the blue pill, Neo.
MagnusNyborg 1 month ago
@merkal90000
LOL, anti-psychotic meds are a wonderful things
FellOnSoundGarden 1 month ago
@merkal90000 OH SHIT! IT'S LOGIC! RUN AWAY! lol You're funny.
BreakTheSkyMyseIf 1 month ago
My left ear loved this video.
PurplePeopleEater4 1 month ago 25
He has his preconceived opinions and couldn't give a f@*k about what they have to say "MY opinion. MY opinion. MY opinion"
Seldomsleeper 1 month ago
This is the type of behavior that natural selection and/or social selection would naturally toss into the rubbish bin!!!
shade9592 2 months ago
@shade9592
The more I watch these videos, the more I desire a society which looks favorably on eugenics.
blackacidlizzard 1 month ago 2
@blackacidlizzard You wouldn't need eugenics for this guy... Euthanasia would be enough. He want's do die, ok... If that makes him happy! Why not?
shade9592 1 month ago
I love the middle finger at the end.
frightenedsoul 2 months ago
OMFG! My heart is racing at the frustration... Jesus Christ! LOL!
DavidAMIs 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Even non-religious people know this.
The homosexual agenda is not good for anyone, including those who consider themselves "gay".
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfully framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 2 months ago
i swear i'm going to hang up on your ass XDXD
PirateMonkeyFilmz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
After receiving two abusive messages here on Youtube, I thought I'd take some time today to spread around my joy at how 1GodOnly1 has revealed his true nature. Just for making simple, civil comments offering a counter view, he blocked me (under two different user names) AND called me a "shit bag troll". So, for anyone who enjoys seeing true colors expressed, there ya go. For those who 'like' him, well, what do you think now?
jcisbell 2 months ago
If we were created by a god that "gave us a moral compass" we'd all agree on what is and isn't moral, but we don't. Morality wouldn't have changed over time, but it has. Slavery, a rape victim having to marry her rapist, stoning to death disobedient children and people who work on the sabbath, etc., were okay in the christian bible, but most people find those things abhorrent today.
YY4Me133 2 months ago
One question that is blatantly obvious, but for some reason always skips the theists narrow minded viewpoint is this... If god gave us an innate moral sense, then why did we need the 10 commandments allegedly immortalized in stone tablets? Shouldn't they be a natural inclination that supersede conscious thought irrespective of social environment?
gotwog 3 months ago 2
hah FSM in the background, awesome XD
mimikawaii7386 3 months ago
Why does this play only in the left side of my headphones? This makes me feel slightly deaf...
shady9321 3 months ago
lol, matt kills me, smart smart man
grumpyguts1967 3 months ago 2
Honestly these two idiots are the STUPIDEST SMART PEOPLE
mas03 4 months ago
Lol, Matt gave the guy finger on 09:54 . :D
Immuuni 4 months ago 2
@Immuuni lol XD
TheLoudale 3 months ago
2222pauline= troll preacher
shimwah 4 months ago
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion however satisfying and reassuring. -Carl Sagan
jeremythehuman 4 months ago in playlist Religion - Best of The Atheist Experience Show
This guy doesn't understand how people domesticated animals, the fox thing is awesome. They even start to change physically, very cool to look into.
Martial024 4 months ago
Matt;
"I personally believe slavery is absolutely reprehensible & immoral."
Douche;
"But in a Godless universe there is no immoral."
Matt;
"Right! I agree! The universe is dead empty space! It doesn't give a shit about slavery! Only individuals & societies do!"
Douche;
"... yeah but there is no morality so how-"
Lol! Fuck me, whoever came up with this bullshit argument from Objective Morality needed a foot up their crack. They really set us back a couple of centuries.
TheNarcMan 4 months ago
Tracie seems like one of those chicks that would cut her hair even though you told her chicks with super short hair dont turn you on... but you fuck her anyway.
deshaebeasley 4 months ago
My left ear enjoyed this:)
KamiPrestige 4 months ago
Tracie looks hot
Koenma007 4 months ago
OMG! I think Matt just flipped us all the Bird at the end!!! lol
jrcahill2 5 months ago
Morality is VERY simple;
When I do something good to someone else, it makes me feel good.
When I do something bad to someone else it makes me feel bad.
Only the concept of a god giving you unlimited forgiveness for everything bad you do to others could pervert such a simple idea.
aegisgfx 5 months ago 51
@aegisgfx its not that simple. many ppl who do bad things and it makes them feel good. the could kill someone and try to justify it. i've seen them do this. this is why morality has to be absolute. not everyone naturally does what right as u can see with all the crime that goes on.
nikitty020 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nikitty020
"this is why morality has to be absolute. not everyone naturally does what right as u can see with all the crime that goes on."
>Morality is not absolute, it changes according to the Cultural Sphere.
-Claim otherwise, and I'll provide passages fromt he bible which are seen today as very immoral and criminal, then seen as normal.
You can't claim absolutes and then not see the faults in your faith-book.
ArmaFennica 5 months ago
@nikitty020 morality is always tied up to the culture and time.
no-one follows the same code people did in biblical times.
well some do, but theyre in jail. most likely.
OmfgItsHenu 5 months ago 7
@aegisgfx
Somebody could argue with you that the fact that you feel good or bad about an action is a consequense of morality, more than a base to build one.
To make an argument valid i suggest we base it on logic more than emotions.
I would promote confucius golden rule, that you can accept with pure logic only.
ChristianIce 4 months ago
@aegisgfx The question is WHY do you feel good when you do good to others and WHY do you feel bad when you do bad to others. The best explanation is GOD
mas03 4 months ago
@mas03
LOL, ya out of the thousand explanations your invisible friend is the most likely.. get fucked moron.
aegisgfx 4 months ago
@aegisgfx When we go about seeking the truth, we might not KNOW 100% but we go with the most plausible explanation. And unless you can give me a better one ITS GOD
mas03 4 months ago
@mas03
LOL lets fill in the blanks with MAGIC. hahahaha. And since I am not a biochemist, I don't have all the answers but I'm sure if you read up on a little bit of Sam Harris, you'll see there are plenty of scientific answers for how morality manifests that do not require your 'invisible friend' or 'magic'. Now fuck off christian idiot. Go somewhere else to peddle your snake oil bullshit.
aegisgfx 4 months ago
@aegisgfx You are telling me to go read Sam Harris who is a Neurologist who knows nothing about Philosophy and critical thinking. lol
mas03 4 months ago
@mas03
oh ya, Sam Harris knows nothing about critical thinking... LOL, everything else out of your mouth is now pointless drivel.
aegisgfx 4 months ago
@mas03 a cosmic jewish zombie that sacrificed himself to himself to circumvent a rule he created? you can't think of anything more plausible than that? you are scary.
PageofLegend 3 weeks ago
@mas03: No, you feel good because what we call love (motherly love, sexual etc.), friendship etc. rewards us with endorphines and the like which make us feel "good" as opposed to, say, the pain we feel when we are getting hurt or the hunger/existencial fear when we are on our own when kicked out of a group because we did something "bad" (even some animal groups cast out adults who mistreat the youngs of the group for example). That's nature's concept to make us do what is best to survive.
Trampadoo 3 months ago
@aegisgfx But some people feel good doing things most of us could agree with is wrong. I personally ask myself "Do I negatively affect another by my actions, or even myself?" or "Would I approve if I was the recipient of my actions?" That's a good way to tell right from logic...logic and putting yourself in anothers shoes.
KatieTaylor24 3 months ago
@KatieTaylor24
Yes, but some people are incapable of logic, mentally ill people for example. And the problems of mental illness are compounded exponentially when you add religion to the mix, because instead of seeking help for their problems, they might think its 'god' talking to them telling to go on a shooting rampage or drown all their kids.
aegisgfx 3 months ago 2
@aegisgfx Morality is VERY simple;
When God says something is good it is good.
When God says something is bad it is bad.
Only the concept of moral reltavism giving everyone free reign to decide what is good or bad for themselves could pervert such a simple idea.
Nalenec 2 weeks ago
@Nalenec
You need to give up this moronic notion that gods are real, in order to grow you have to give up your irrational beliefs. Do you think as a child you could have ever grown up if you never stopped believing in Santa Claus?
aegisgfx 2 weeks ago
@aegisgfx As an atheist, if you're consistent, you don't really believe I have the free-will to give up any beliefs -- or that there is an objective moral imperative for me to grow up, be rational or believe/behave one way or another -- or that there's even any REAL value in doing anything (like giving up my theism). Your invective works against you.
Nalenec 1 week ago
@Nalenec As a consistent atheist, I think free will is part of a false dilemma, sure. But I do think there is such a thing as objective morality, because all morality - secular or otherwise - is by definition a code of behavior intended to maximize benefit and minimize suffering. The only thing "subjective" about it is that an effective moral code is also dependent on the specifics of human nature, which is a fluid and complex thing.
"Objective morality" is like "objective hunger".
YaleBreaker 1 week ago
@YaleBreaker There can only be an objective morality if "morality" itself can be objectively defined and agreed upon. (i.e. saying to "maximize benefit" is not an objective definition as peoples views on what the definition of "benefit" is are subjective).
Moreover, even if we could objectively define what you call "morality" does not mean everyone will agree. You are describing the consequentialist school of thought, but there are other views also.
66tomm99 5 days ago
@66tomm99 This is why I compared objective morality to hunger. You're on a mysterious island with a bunch of people. You're all hungry, but you want to eat different things and conflicts result. You work out how to distribute the food so everyone can be approximately happy.
There are subjective elements to morality, yes, but the foundation is objective: hunger exists. That's what I mean when I say "objective morality"; not that one size fits all, but that people need a size in the first place.
YaleBreaker 3 days ago
@YaleBreaker I don't really get your analogy. What is the objective foundation of morality that you mention? I honestly can't think of anything about morality that is objective and that everyone agrees on...
66tomm99 3 days ago
@66tomm99 Most, if not all, of us have inbuilt drives seeking safety, survival, resource acquisition, mates. With more of a stretch, intellectual fulfillment (i.e. not boredom), bonds of family or friendship. In a social setting, we need to personally and mutually control our behaviors in order to more effectively achieve these needs. To me, morality is any code - written, unwritten, spoken or unspoken - that we develop to facilitate that control, and by extension, those achievements.
YaleBreaker 3 days ago
@66tomm99 ...and basically that would be the most objective foundation of any morality that I can think of.
YaleBreaker 3 days ago
@YaleBreaker To me at least, by you saying "it is any code" suggests it to be not objective. I agree to an extent we develop a morality for those things however that morality carries on developing and changing depending on the views of the people who abide by it, which means it is utterly subjective.
66tomm99 3 days ago
@66tomm99 It's those terms "subjective" and "objective", I guess.
As far as I can tell, if - for instance - we have a society of people who value their lives, and someone kills someone else for no particular reason, that is objectively immoral - even though the particulars of the moral code are based on subjective criteria.
In the end, though, I just don't see the fuss about "objective" morality. It should be "what works", not what's "woven into the fabric of the universe", you know?
YaleBreaker 3 days ago
@YaleBreaker Maybe it is just that, the word objective itself may have different meanings to different people. What a paradox...
66tomm99 3 days ago
"Me Neither" *click*
I love Matt.
aegisgfx 5 months ago 2
I really don't get why people make this morality issue so difficult. I know some are stupid people who have doorknobs for brains, but even smart and decent people have this odd assumption that authority must dictate what is "good". It opens far more problems than it answers. I don't get how you can be satisfied in any way with "because he says so" without adding the unavoidable problem that "he" won't/ can't communicate and indistinguishable from a mute, invisible, timeless transcendent radish.
rrpostalagain 5 months ago
matt is steller. "if you don't care if you survive, .... piss off!" I laughed at that. Good one.
AMomentOfClarity2011 6 months ago
You can say you have your "own" moral standards, but that doesn't determine whether morals were inherently built into you or not. If they were, then they were; if not then where did they come from? If they exist as a function of survival, what is so good about "this" life, and why should we not kill/steal/lie to achieve the most pleasure out of our short time?
Qgolfman 6 months ago
@Qgolfman For saying that, you prove you yourself have no morals. It's perfectly simple; killing someone is bad because no one wants to die at another's hands. A death affects many people; friends, family, ect. If one is responsible for another's death then the one respnsible mustbe held accountable by the justice system. No need for some supernatural overkill dumbass.
NUTCASE71733 6 months ago
@NUTCASE71733 But that still assumes that all people are operating on some standard, because they realize death is inherently wrong...Still, in my opinion, you wittle down human life to whether or not one wishes to continue existing, but fail to make any progress on our actual state of existence. In other words, you say you want to continue living, but have not provided a good reason for doing so
Qgolfman 6 months ago
@Qgolfman someone will kill/steal/lie it right back from you,even people with mental disabilities can do those things.the best genes for survival would not get passed down.on a even playing field with rules and laws,i believe i can perform better then you and get more perks from life that will be protected by the government and stay in my possession.what makes me think that?ego.any wealth i save can be passed down to my children.people are still just as ruthless as if they kill/steal/lie.
tommiedepew1 5 months ago
"FOR"
Daiblix 6 months ago
Really, folks, is the mono sound bugging you that much? It's not a stereophonic musical extravaganza, it's just people talking, so who cares if it's only in one speaker? Geesh...what about the CONTENT of the show? That's much more important. Also, since none of us is paying to see this video, nobody has the right to snipe at VeninGriffe for not having time to fix the video. Get over it! (Man, sometimes YouTubers are the most annoying, whiny, spoiled little drips on the planet!)
paxpaul 6 months ago 4
@paxpaul I don't understand, sound is coming out of both my headphones...
66tom99 6 months ago
@66tom99 Yeah, now it sounds stereo, but when I wrote that (in response to others who complained), the sound was just coming out of one channel.
paxpaul 6 months ago
Haha I don't really care if the right speaker is broken, because I always listen with my left ear only.
Andy32268 6 months ago
flying spaghetti monster in the background!
May his noodly apendage touch all our hearts...
Lol, I love how Matt says, "Me either!" *hangs up*
rsgirl10 7 months ago
left sound for me XD
sailornaruto39 7 months ago
this caller is thick as pig shit. hes not even listening to the explanations of matt and tracie. he isnt trying to figure out anything, hes just trying to push the point that god created morals. fucking hate people who replace their ears with mouths.
mattakudesu 7 months ago 48
@mattakudesu CLICK on 2222pauline
ALLOW me to show you ----- TRUTH and SALVATION -----> for free
2222pauline 4 months ago
stupid ass caller...
belladonna4577 7 months ago
I love your show's intro music.
RaggedM88 8 months ago
There is will to survive; there is no need to survive.
Emanresu56 9 months ago
i love the title of this video "Slightly Suicidal Caller"
VanHalen07994 9 months ago
@megastratix Then who has the perfect perpective to see the truth?
jorgebe87 9 months ago
@brochill69 I didnt say science can't explain something but that it can't explain everything. Everything can probably be explained, but what is everything anyway? And what is truth? Truth is just a consept, like love and hate. But when you say that science can do everything, dont you think you say that nothing is impossible and thereby anything could be? Science needs to be very humble in that way and not deny everything THEY cant explain. Remember that words are just consepts in your mind...
jorgebe87 9 months ago
@jorgebe87 Truth is more than a concept. There are certain truths to the universe that are demonstrable and can be shown to someone and proven in a realm where their version of truth is quite different than your own. Words aren't just concepts, they stir them in your mind. This doesn't for a second shake the truths of science. Science needs to be humble? LOL Tell that to the religious who truly think the, "creator of the universe cares for me!"
The wide spectrum of skew is astounding.
spydertub3 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jorgebe87 No they are not just concepts. Are you high or something? Truth is something which is based on corroborative evidence and facts. It's not just a concept. If you can't distinguish between a concept and truth, then you need to go back to school. You're right when you say that that science needs to be humble since that's what makes it much more rational and productive in comparison to religion. But by you saying that something is unachievable by science with given time is pure ignorance
brochill69 9 months ago
@jorgebe87 The term ridiculous means deserving of ridicule. This garbage is a example of the term. Science needs to be humble? How do we go about humbling science? This makes no sense at all! I think you should study more than you listen to others. Find and research a few things in any scientific field then ask yourself how do I make this more humble. Reminds me of my alter ego/personality. You peepoe better be humbling science or gawd will burn your azz up in hell. His gloryhole is so loving
bigsubwayman1 8 months ago
do you talk in blah blah? :)
megastratix 9 months ago
ahahahahha i love when matt hangs up on this guy!
Freethinker12341 9 months ago
@Freethinker12341 shut up biotch
killer1014021 9 months ago
9:54 - Hey, that's rude.
logik316 10 months ago
Gotta love the Flying Spaghetti Monster!
defonicjamz 10 months ago
Eating babies? This man clearly knows his atheism.
Dubonjierugi 10 months ago
I love Matt and think he's awesome, but I felt
He strawmanned that dude a bit
after he had hung up on him. I didnt hear any mention of believing in any God etc.
Sakkawokkkie 10 months ago
Faith is the most dangerous word in the English language.
morrow71 10 months ago
@LowdenFretter Both science and religion is trying to explain what's going on. What people seem to don't understand is that the world is arbitrary and that these are just maps of reality. And some maps can cast light on sides of life that other maps wont. Its just a matter of where you put YOUR faith which is not in the hands of anyone but YOU!
jorgebe87 10 months ago
@jorgebe87 But science DOES explain what is going on with demonstrable and corroborative proof. Religion is in no way equivalent to science at all. Science is not faith-based by any means. It is based on fact and is realistic evidence. Faith is not wanting to know what is true which directly contradicts science. By lumping science and religion into the same category, you have just proven how nonsensical your way of thinking is. No offense, just stating the truth.
brochill69 9 months ago
@brochill69 I can agree on that there is a difference between science and religion and that faith is a more essential part of religion. BUT science can't explain everything and it has a very limited way of thinking. I see it more like a method for breaking the barriers of space and time. And shure hell, it works! But there are questions and sides of nature that science cannot explain and simply ignores them because there are no mysteries to science, it can all be explained.
jorgebe87 9 months ago
Comment removed
brochill69 9 months ago
@jorgebe87 But how can YOU say that science cannot explain something? Just because it can't be explained in this day and age, doesn't mean it will not be explained in the future. To say that something is not achievable by science is ignorant. For example, people used to think that it would be impossible to fly in the sky and only the "gods" possess that power but thanks to science, we have obtained the knowledge and technology on how to do so. Science has the ability to learn anything with time
brochill69 9 months ago
Comment removed
jorgebe87 9 months ago
Comment removed
jorgebe87 9 months ago
@brochill69 And THAT has not jet been proven! They have simply placed their FAITH on that THAT is the truth...
jorgebe87 9 months ago
@jorgebe87 truth is based on perspective. evidence is not biased where faith is.
megastratix 9 months ago
@12InchesUnBuffed Its definitely not common sense to disprove god since there is a large percentage who have had religious and spiritual experiences. This is understandably enough difficult for a person who have never had such an experience to understand.
jorgebe87 11 months ago
@EVERYONE The question of whether or not god exists is in bad taste. It has been an endless argument for different paradigms. Both religion and science, as institutions, tells us that they have the perfect map of seeing the world from. This is fucking arrogant from both sides. I think religion explains things that science don't understand and take for granted. So forget ideology, they betray! We need to acknowledge all kinds of paradigms and not get stuck to one and make war with the others!
jorgebe87 11 months ago
@jorgebe87 im not a science guy. im really stupid when it comes to science. i dont need science to disprove god's existence. my common sense does.
12InchesUnBuffed 11 months ago
@jorgebe87 The truth is, some paradigms ARE better than others - more useful, easier to back up, more coherent with the rest of what you know. So while I'd do what you say in the name of tolerance, I feel that it'd be misleading to myself if I handled all ideologies as equal when I know that they are not. (Any paradigm, not just religion/science.)
whade62000 11 months ago
@jorgebe87 I don't think that science tells you that they have a perfect map - they just tell you what they think they know and, hey, you can go and test it. It says nothing about most unknowable things.
whade62000 11 months ago
@jorgebe87 Religion doesn't 'explain' anything. Religion isn't in the business of explaining. Religion is in the business of faith and faith is just another way of saying you have no good reason to believe something.
LowdenFretter 10 months ago
@londonafter i correct you sir that is the true form of great cthulu LULZ
spawn10317 11 months ago
Well said/done Matt...
Katalyzt
Katalyzt 11 months ago
LOL @ 9:54
besidemymind 1 year ago
Does he even know what begging the question is?
SQuiRR3LM0nk3y 1 year ago
I don't quite agree with her that morality is relative to society. What if a particular society believes that rape is okay? Does that magically make it all right? I don't think so. Babies being born into that society are not choosing to be born into a society which allows rape!
I agree with Sam Harris that moral claims are claims about the well-being of conscious creatures.
somespareid 1 year ago
@somespareid Someone else will say you're wrong and vice versa and that's the problem with morality, it's too subjective and value based.
SQuiRR3LM0nk3y 1 year ago
@SQuiRR3LM0nk3y
Sure, they might say I'm wrong, but what does it matter? Creationists claim that evolution isn't real, but again that's irrelevant.
The idea behind morality is simple. If I left my house right now and kicked a rock, it wouldn't matter. But if I kicked a cat, we're talking about something entirely different. Why? Because cats are conscious creatures capable of suffering.
As Sam Harris says, moral claims are just claims about the well-being of conscious creatures.
somespareid 1 year ago
@somespareid
It's even more basic than that. When you leave your house to kick a rock, you wouldn't want me to come in and steal all your stuff. You can find a bunch of people who are willing to give up their "right" to steal stuff in exchange for not getting stuff stolen and agree to punish those who do. Same goes for killing and in any society (human or animal) where animals live together, such moral rules evolved because groups where they did were more succesful than those where they didn't
sharkjack 11 months ago
OMG THAT SPAGHETTI MONSTER IN THE BACKGROUND MUST BE PROOF OF GOD O.O oh wait, thats a spaghetti monster. completely explainable, radiation, octopi, and italy. score one science, zero bible (Bib-ly)
pissedatpez 1 year ago
The AE spends an inordinate amount of time dealing with idiots. Most unfortunate.
faithisfiction 1 year ago
Ramen to coolvideo28 the Cookie Monster (peace be upon Him) is one of the praise prophets of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which the Flying Spaghetti Monster created us. Be blessed by his noodly appendage, as he boiled his noodly appendage to cleanse our sin. =)
Ramen.
nctrls2 1 year ago
@nctrls2 OMG! LOL that is awesome
rylove001 1 year ago
dillahunty needs to stop talking about morals when he threatens to hang up on everyone's ass
northregent 1 year ago
@northregent how is hanging up on someone who pisses you off immoral?
ManMarriage 1 year ago
"If you don't care if you survive, piss off!"
x-D
0toHero 1 year ago
ZOMFG HIS NOODLYNESS THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER IN THE BACKGROUND!
yuo252 1 year ago
"It's absolutely wrong to me" is meaningless. It can't be absolutely wrong, but only wrong to one person. It must be absolutely wrong to all people. You COULD say it's absolutely wrong but only I can see it.
Redfingers 1 year ago
@Redfingers Check out stefbot on youtube. He has an interesting logical argument for Universal ethics. I'm still trying to wrap my head around it but it's worth a read.
BrainInSkull 1 year ago
@BrainInSkull
I'm not saying you can't say "it's absolutely wrong," I'm saying that the statement "it's absolutely wrong to me" is meaningless. It can be absolutely wrong, but only to you? If it's only wrong to you it's not absolutely wrong. It's a contradiction.
Redfingers 1 year ago
@Redfingers Yes we would have to define what is meant by absolutely? There may be a way to say that something is logically wrong for everyone in regards to morality.
"If it's only wrong to you it's not absolutely wrong" Is that an absolutely right statement or just to you?
BrainInSkull 1 year ago
@BrainInSkull
If you mean it can apply differently to different people when you say absolutely, that's not absolutely in the traditional sense, that's subjectively, which is a direct contradiction to the traditional definition and redundant considering he already said that it was wrong "to me."
Of course I can't exactly define the term for him, he didn't define it, so I have to assume, and that's what I think he said, rightly or wrongly.
Redfingers 1 year ago
@Redfingers To say something cannot be verifiability true or false unless all people are in agreement is just stupid. Things can be proven or disproven by less than the majority, and are often done so be only a single person. I have shredded your dopey argument. Next time, try using you brain instead of your mouth, half-wit.
RadarGuidedVermin 1 year ago
Dude, the sound on this video is all fucked up. It's only coming out of one side of my headphones :/
CuriousMoth 1 year ago 48
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@CuriousMoth
It's your computer. I'm getting sound out of both headphones.
VeninGriffe 1 year ago
@VeninGriffe its only coming out my left speaker as well =s weird.
MoonKittenJD 1 year ago 39
@MoonKittenJD
I no longer have the original video. However, I'll see what I can do to fix it.
VeninGriffe 1 year ago
I checked into it and I'd have to remake the video to fix the sound. Sorry, but I don't have the time for that.
VeninGriffe 1 year ago
@VeninGriffe Youtube needs a manual equalizer where we could sorta fix this problem ourselves...
ragnarok343 8 months ago
@VeninGriffe It's been 7 months, surely you have time now?
wolfbane378 7 months ago
@VeninGriffe
There is a an edited version of this whole episode on my channel.
TheAtheistExperience 7 months ago
@MoonKittenJD only one of my speakers works.. It's never been a problem yet :/
bushiyo2 6 months ago
@VeninGriffe
Sound is coming out of both my headphones, but the volume levels are louder on the left side.
rkyeun 1 year ago
@VeninGriffe check your not running your sound mono
gtmilenko 1 year ago
@VeninGriffe Sounds that your computer's audio output is mono :P
gunblade64 11 months ago
@VeninGriffe Nope same for me.
Rawralion 10 months ago
@CuriousMoth Maybe you other ear didn't fully evolve.
YesYou123333 1 year ago
@CuriousMoth
You're not wrong, im only getting it out of the left side of my surround sound..
Tait011 11 months ago
@CuriousMoth oh, thank god, I thought I was having a stroke.
ragnarok343 10 months ago
@CuriousMoth oh fuck i know what you mean -.-
axax444 8 months ago