Added: 4 years ago
From: thisisjenni
Views: 33,637
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (295)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Amazing

  • If you do these things to "your" children... they won't be YOUR children at all. They will be artificial children, NOT with your genes in them. And over generations if they keep doing it they will not be human. All genes have a reason for being there, what seems like a defect is pretty much always actually a reaction to the unnatural environment we live in. The more unnatural something is the less adapted we are for it. This would completely wipe out any possible descendants you would have.

  • @RaniaIsAwesome

    Oh fuck off. Are you saying adopted children aren't the children of their adoptive parents?

  • wow u guys that post paragraphs u r nerds

  • If you and your wife had to use in vitro-fertilization for her to become pregnant would you want her to select the genetically healthy embryo or the one that would die young from a familial disease? It is inhumane to not use this technology for the betterment of humanity. Countless amounts of human suffering can be prevented as a result of human genetic enhancement.

  • I think it's ignorant how people automatically think lets see who we can make beautiful when they hear genetic engineering, not what diseases we can cure. Gene therapy could be the one thing that could prevent children from getting leukemia, like my brother. Why should people suffer from problems they cannot control? The 3 natural rights of the constitution are life, liberty and happiness, so we should be guarnteed life.

  • Huxley, anyone?

  • Remember, not everything that is new is improved. Something will always have flaws and no matter what, we will never be perfect but unique in our own way. One day, the human race will split into two species called "Naturals" and "GenRich" yet this means an unprecedented future.

  • OMG this is scary

  • this is a bit extreme like when it comes to treating genetic disorders i am all for it since it like a medicine which will make you better....but things such as picking ur child's eye color thats a little too much...

  • every time i hear "genetic engineering," i immediately think of the Maximum Ride series, which i love, and the beyond fucked up movie Splice.

  • I want my babies to have wings!

  • hey I was wondering...what music did you use for this video?

    Great video by the way! I have to do a presentation on this topic and I sadly lack the ability to make vids like this! Good job!

  • Why does the first sentence spoken sound so grammatically wrong?

    ' If there was a way for your child be born free and without...'

    Let's at least try and use the English language 'more better', before when begin offering videos about the pros & cons of Eugenics.

  • @rezek71 that's not even the sentence at all, you took out words and added words

  • i want children with purple hair....

  • Will you fly with us into the future?

    If you want us to build HotelsInSpace, Subscribe, Like Add and Send

    With your help we could mass produce these HotelsInSpace, lifting 6 satellites, 213 people and 1/6 of the next HotelsInSpace, per launch...

    APlaceInSpaceToPlay

    Want to help?

    Be one of us?

  • This "Designer Baby" idea is brilliant to a certain extent. Removing diseases and illnesses from the face of this world would be extraordinary, but to remove beauty/difference from this planet will be more devastating then the diseases that would be extinguished. Sure you can make babies better/stronger/smarter, but only to a certain extent. See this designer baby idea can only duplicate genes that were taken from another human which gives no room for evolution by limiting our gene pool.

  • the perfect race, this is the heavenly plan of hittler vision. also forgot that the reason we are sick and have so maney diffects is becuase of the gmo corps. taking out the vidimins or bodys need to stay healty. posin the water and have us clean up the mess. I say this is a great thing but not in just your hands. you allow 1 person to control this "13familyies" "cough" rockerfeller" cough cough"" its all going toshit for all of us. find it in your hearts to make this a good thing no a wepon.

  • the perfect race, this is the heavenly plan of hittler vision.

  • Correction on eugenics: Eugenics can be dated back to Magaret Sanger, Karl Marx, Darwin (Survival of the fittest), The Crusades (A "holy" war), and beyond. Not a novel idea, but one that is currently taking root in modern ideology, medicine, and political practice. Even cleverly hidden or masked in the media.

  • super-race (Sorry, I ran out of space for my comment).

  • What's next? X-Men? When you try to play God it might not have the end results that is desired. Even if you can clone or otherwise modify plant, animal, or human DNA, there is moral, ethical dilemma, and possible far - reaching consequences should you do so. Don't be decieved. Genetic Engineering's biggest proponents are often involved in eugenics, from theory to practice. Eugenics can be dated as far back as Nazi Germany and Hitler's own programs to exterminate "inferior races" and create a

  • @Mjena23 who cares about Hitler. everything has its problems if we keep complaining about the past we will never make it

  • @TheHumanUnity But, we should care. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

  • @Mjena23 Using Hitler as a means to refute eugenics or, more importantly, genetic engineering is ridiculous. The supposed "super-race" that could be developed with genetic engineering would have genetic traits from ALL races. We could look however we wanted, be as athletic as Africans, as good at math as Asians, (insert any positive stereotype here, etc.). Every child would truly be a child of humanity because they would have qualities from all the best parts of it. Sounds good all around.

  • Hit the underwater lab and watch the fish with the human spinal cords float up. How to make embrionic fluid from ocean water. Perfect for the cold water fish/human gene splice. When the cry of the unmercifully designed reaches the heavens you better know it is heard!

  • this video is going to invoke a lot of naive thoughts. interesting, but so so wrong. just a few questions, what then (if this became true) would define be defined as 'fit' in survival of the fittest of humans? what traits would slip through with our desired chosen traits? (keeping in mind these future traits will influence the next gen on what to give 'their' generation) who will have access? how can we choose traits of the human mind when we can't even classify said traits?

  • so I ask is this still a human? have we transformed humanity? are the steps needed 2 continue 2 survive? the challenges we soon face will determine if these process are needed. it may also cause our demise as a species. that is the reason 4 the slow progression of this process. WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

  • the scientist have taken DNA from animals & crossed them with humans creating hybrids. human features with eyesight of an owl. hearing of a bat with sonar detection strenth of a silverback never ending growth of an anaconda intellegence of many speciecs combined. but all with the characteristics of a human. A SUPER HUMAN!

  • humans have been & are being cloned like it or not. a scientist is sumwhere secretly cloning & genetically manipulating the DNA of clones & humans.

  • can someone tell me which is the name of the background music used at the end of the presentation when the speaker is stating the conclusion? thank you:)

  • What happened to being all natural?

  • This may be the only means to maintain a decent population of caucasians and keep us from becoming completely extinct. Since so many white women are refusing to have white children in replace of a career insted and all the interbreeding that is taking place which is primarily between whites and some other ethnic group. Maybe this will prevent natural blondes and redheads from going extinct either. I only hope :)

  • @Dancing88Mike oh my god clearly you came on to this with some sort of agenda lol.....you do realise that if white women and white men decide to have a child with a black person or asian person the offspring of this union will possess the blonde haired gene if that's what gene the parent passes down...blondes will never go extinct because of this fact...just because someone has black hair..eg bob marley...it doesn't mean he didn't possess the gene for blonde hair (hence bobs father was blonde)

  • @Dancing88Mike learn mendels law of sergregation and independent assortment...clearly genetics isn't something you know too much about...the number of blondes could reduce drastically for a generation or 2 but the genes will always be there.....however why do you care about blondes so much?....I have blonde hair and hate to break it to you but it's only a hair colour..personally I'd prefer to have darker hair if I had a choice in the matter

  • More and more limits fade each day.

  • Cloning, Genetic Engineering, Eugenics, Selective Breeding and Euthanasia are 5 entirely different things...

    Try to research definitions before running off at The mouth and sounding uneducated...

    I bet you wouldn't know which one is different from The others because you are that dull..

  • Even if The so called White race is so pure that doesn't mean that it couldn't use a little bit of improvement if you know what I mean....

  • We should breed Slimmer Taller Better Looking Men and Nicer more Attractive woman...

    We could breed for more Intelligence as well..

    The Sterilization of millions of The undesirable and The propagation of The more fit should be enforced...

  • @NinjaChampionKO really? a little bit of a eugenist huh. just as long as black,jews,etc get breeded out.....see not so fun huh.

  • I'm more concerned with unattractive white men and woman...

  • @NinjaChampionKO well im more concerned with chinks,niggers,spiks,etc. then the pure white race........

  • Yes but there are some Blacks Asians and Mexicans who are in some cases better looking than whites...

    Try to look at The whole picture before deciding to discriminate against certain groups...

  • She is talking about a movie called GATTICA at 4:29. good movie if anyone cares to watch one

  • The name of movie Gattaca 1997.

    Indeed a great movie.

    Awesome.

  • Genetic engineering would be safer in cases where selective miscegenation is involved...

  • Lies. brainwashed bimbo.

    Genetic Engineering exists for a long time, it's just not open to public yet.

  • this is the best idea ive ever heard of and we are not taking it to far, were taking it to the next level. i dont want to hear any negative comments because we can create perfect humans eventully replace the population with super humans impervious to disease and mental and physical deffects. stronger ,faster,smarter and able to look and do things we all wish we were able to do and be

  • indeed

  • @FUTUREMANGURU you only have to know even a little bit about human biology to know just how far we have to go with our understanding. we have a lot more to learn, even just about evolution of our own species to know this shouldn't happen.

  • @FUTUREMANGURU uh....and what about side effects?

  • @FUTUREMANGURU only the rich can afford this so all the poor people would be screwed 

  • @FUTUREMANGURU I agree with you in the fact that we can become immune to diseases and become a step closer to perfection. But if you think about it, there will obviously be genetic prejudice as people will begin to make their children all one particular trait. Eventually everyone will have the same trait because it is what's attractive in society. Those born without these supremacies will be subjected to ruination. Watch Gattica.

  • @DarkMnMChocolate I couldn't disagree more with your assertion that everyone will choose the same traits for their children to the point that everyone will look the same. Variety is the spice of life as it goes, and certain features would probably wax and wane in popularity. The great thing about being able to pick displayed traits is that certain recessive, but attractive, traits can be readily shown where they would otherwise naturally be hidden.

  • @FUTUREMANGURU YOU ARE A RETARDED FUCKING ASSHOLE, YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU ARE TRYING TO SUICIDE HUMANITY AND ALL PEOPLE LIKE US WITH THAT FUCKING NONSENSE. ASSHOLE.

  • @RaniaIsAwesome calm down Rania. 

  • @tomtomabs You want me to calm down when clueless people are putting forward material that would WIPE OUT ALL PEOPLE LIKE US???? Why would you want people to be "smarter"? Smarter isn't BETTER... Humans have done nothing but pollute and destroy the planet, none of these problems we have now existed in paleolithic times. Why would you want brains to grow larger and larger and where would it all end? Look at how humans treat other animals, that's because they have a lot less brains.

  • Who the f. do you think you are? nothing is 100% known. Everybody can change and heal without science has an answer to it. Before you say things as "humanity is mature enough to deal with the consequences of such science" FIND A CURE 4 CANCER, AIDS ect. We are already with to many people on earth, witch is polluted. Clone the earth for godsake. U wanna change? Begin with yourself. Find solution for the problems that are urgent to be solved NOW. pretension, prediction brings nothing.

  • baby with wing

  • Don't you think they'ed need TWO wings?

  • A mouse was recently conceived in the laboratory using two eggs and no sperm. This was important enough—but what was more important was that the mouse lived significantly longer than normal (something like a third longer). I has been suggested that something in the sperm causes a decreased life expectancy for the offspring. This technique of reproduction (using two eggs) might be applicable to human beings, and the result might be similar to that in the mouse.

  • Artificial parthenogenesis of mammals often results in developmental abnormalities due to genetic imprinting. This significantly limits its utility, especially in the case of humans.

  • This is not parthenogenesis in any sense. The eggs came from different mothers. The developmental abnormality in question here is increased health and prolonged life. This is the product of the experiment, and the anomoly that must now be explained. What part of normal reproduction causes reduced life-expectancy in the progeny? What is the factor in sperm that makes even the daughters die earlier?

  • Have you got a link to the study you're alluding to? I'd be interesting in reviewing it.

  • interested*

  • I was under the impression that two eggs from separate females or the same female both constitute parthenogenesis. How does the former arrangement circumvent the problem of genetic imprinting in the case of mammals?

  • Parthenogenesis involves the production of a diploid egg that is ready and able to produce an embryo without sperm. It is true virgin-birth.

    One of the two contributing oocytes was from pups whose imprinting centers had been genetically manipulated, and in the resulting progeny the new genotype produced an aparent delay in all causes of mortality--and thus produced an extended lifespan.

  • that was in 2004....if you want to call that 'recent' its name is kaguya. she was the only mouse to survive out of almost 500 others.

    the doctors even said that it was not normal by any means....just less abnormal then the ones that survived.

    they have also said that she could have MAJOR problems down the road.

    and to further state ....they are not even sure its possible with humans.

    they are not even sure if they can clone a human or primate.

    this precedure is impracticle.

  • it did not 'live longer'. it lived longer then the others who did not even make it to term.

    like i said before this type of technology is impracticle for humans...now and probably forever. they ahve not even attemped to clone humans.....and whos to say that the human wont be retarded,sociopathic,or have to go through suffering because of abnormalitys.

    eventually such precedures will be deemed unethical......as is cloning is already.

  • furthermore i dont think men would let women do this. women have steadily and throughly destroyed our role in society.......do you think men will let women get rid of us? i dont think so.....what need would they have of us if they can have kids together?

    it would revert back to cave men times:"me tarzan you jane....you do what i say".

    not only is this precedue unethical but in the long run it could destroy the human race and set back womens rights MILLENIA

  • It could allow woman to breed taller more intelligent better looking men instead of The overweight ugly shit they have to deal with...

  • @NinjaChampionKO same could be said for you fat ass whores.........works both ways does it not or we could breed you to be mindless fuck toys.

  • I'm a guy you dipshit...

  • not only that....it looks like the scientists of the project have stated that this precedure for humans is and i quote "not necessary,and i would not want to do it".

    so i dont think this precedure at least for humans will EVER get off the ground.

    it might behind closed doors...but for the public...HELL NO.

    so.....sorry all you lesbos hoping for a all women world...not gonna happen.

  • "it is to up to us, to decide how far is too far" - that sums it up pretty well!

  • There are inheritable changes in gene expression, not caused by changes in the genome of the organism, but by the activation or repression of different genes. The conditions that a person suffered during the development of their sex cells produces inheritable, non-genomic alterations in the way the DNA in their descendants is expressed. It was first observed that starvation in the childhood of a grandmother, was manifest as low birth-weight in her granddaughters and great granddaughters.

  • If this kind of interference is acceptable how can they judge athletes for taking performance enhancing drugs?

    What is the difference? Isn't it all a form of tampering what is already there?

  • It's the same reason boxers aren't allowed to use brass knuckles.

  • Thanks that just about sums it all up. Happy New Year FatherChrismas. :o)

  • THEY are in it together,we and the used up clone slaves and soldiers will be deemed obsolete and killed.

  • If you want a good looking baby than have interacial baby or mulitcultural baby simple. dont mess with mother natura

  • Ha, ha, ha, I am an interacial offspring; but, I do not consider myself in any way good looking. What about focusing on who we are rather how we look. When we die it will not make any difference, we all decompose.

  • Comment removed

  • seems creepy

  • as an ugly man, let's just make them attractive so they can have that ultimate human happiness...beauty should be one of the top genetic engineered priorities

  • if anyone were to "build babies", we should make them with superior intelligence. we should make 100s of geniuses an school them roughly, and wait for one of them to discover the cure for cancer or.., how to travel at the speed of light or something.

  • Ya--but what is "superior intelligence" and how can we be sure we're not not just breeding another form of autistic savant? When we rotated our eyes up front for stereo vision, we lost sight of the big picture. Every advantage has its cost. We should never invest in one power to the exclusion of all others. Diversity is the only thing that keeps a species alive in tough times. Whatever comes of the future, we won't win by narrowing our options.

  • .......or blow up the world faster.

  • It just begun, bitch.

  • get over hitler for fucks sake!!!!

  • Homo floresiensis, the little hominids popularly known as Hobbits, have recently been described as having had brain architectures as sophisticated as our own (and at one-third the size). This would suggest that we are (at least in some respects) the poor relations in evolutionary development.

  • The Nazis ignored reality with a Byzantine fantasy making them out to be the origin of all that was clever, and civilized, and good--while they bathed in blood. At the top of their lungs they insulted humanity, while attempting to breed a soulless ruling class. The enemies of compassion got off easy because the bulk of humanity is compassionate, and did not give them the annihilation they so richly deserved.

  • Your in high school? I thought this was great!

  • Combine speed dating with genetic screening That way there is wider gamete choice plus romance

    speed date online or live with a prechosen party group with the purposed idea that if there were children as a result of dating they would be particularly kind happy clever beautiful calm people

    Which is beneficial as half or more of couples divorce creating stress It is possible that children with prearranged genomes may resist turbulent environments to become wonderful people anyway

  • You did a great job with this project! Good work. Very interesting!

  • Genetic Engineering should be legal everyone  has the right to do what they want anyway it will never be as good as a being who is made up of nanomachines

  • this is kind of ...gross

  • Here comes the end of gays.

  • wait... does the future DAD have to eat dairy or the MOM? please reply!

  • A highly Stable and Nonintegrated Human Artificial Chromosome (HAC) Containing the 2.4 Mb Entire Human Dystrophin Gene. ~Mol Ther. 2008 Nov 25

    Can Duchenne muscular dystrophy be cured with the insertion of an additional chromosome? What other things can be done with this?

  • One of the problems with the use of retroviruses in gene therapy has been that the mechanism that inserts new genes into existent chromosomes frequently damages them, and can lead to deleterious mutations and cancer. Artificial chromosomes can be added to the cells without intruding on the functions of the other chromosomes. The functions of these guest chromosomes can be as subtle or radical as one might imagine.

    It reminds me of the App Store.

  • i dont know why This isnt founded by our taxes, I wouldnt want my child to have any sickness. Good video BTW

  • Really impressive for a high school student! I am going to be showing this to my own secondary school pupils next week (if only they were as studious!)

  • The real hope of mankind

    saunters down Ipanema beach,

    proud in a fine abstract thread of modesty &

    coco-butter...

    coffee, cinnamon & cream.

    Love will end race, one romance at a time.

  • All we need is a voluntary, free-spirited, open-ended program of procreative racial deconstruction. ~ Warren Beatty in his character as Senator Bulworth in the film Bulworth.

    This is the fastest and most well proven method of improving the general health of the worlds population, and would have the added benefit of broadening the cultural foundation of the coming generations---reducing the real foundation of racism and war.

    Love should always be how babies are made.

  • The message is good, but the video could be alot better

  • this has little t do with trivial things such as race (although that is alterable) religion, or other things like that more to do with health, physical and mental traits, food, and medicine.

  • HEY JENNI! THE GENTIC ENGINEERING OF TRAITS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HITLERS BELIEFS!

    Hitlers beliefs of "ayrian purity" were based in superstition (yes he was religious), not science, he had the desire to stunt evolution (via inbreeding think marrying your cousins generations over), not progress it.

  • Yes--they were into inbreeding.

  • They seemed to have a lot of fear of being overrun, and of not being able to compete in a world full of cleaver people. Strange—that doesn't seem like a sense of superiority—quite the opposite, really.

    ...and Hitler liked his niece just a bit too much, too,

  • Hilters belifs were to make the perfect human being possible(inbreeding was thought to be a way to improve chances of positive characteristics) and to wipe out any being who didn't comply with this... this is getting pretty close to what he wanted.

  • yeah. What he wanted wasnt evil, it was HOW he tried to acheieve it that was. If we can get rid of homosexuality and mental retardation and midgets and people with diseases and nappy hair and small penises why wouldnt we?

  • True but its when we come into the contex of designing people to be what WE think is perfect that the line has been crossed..... I don't want part of my future to be predetermined.

  • Your future is never predetermined simply by your genes. And no matter if it is humans or pure chance that decides your genes, you do not have a choice.

    The question is, shall we let heartless chance keep deciding our fate or shall we as humans make the choices. I have enough faith in humanity to say that I think the answer should be obvious.

  • there are somethings that are better left to chance, and not humans.humanity can be cruel and heartless,what will happen to a child that is not born smart or handsome because the genetics were not 'fixed' as a lot of people 'would' put it. would we throw it away like adolf, saying a child thats not perfect is not a child at all?See history repeat itself, ie, WW2?that is what most likely will happen and what is meant to be the balance in nature, WILL shift, and we will suffer in the end, garanted

  • You're lack of confidence in your fellow humanity is disturbing.

    Yes we can be cruel and heartless, this only reflect the fact that the world we live in is cruel and heartless world. The universe does not mourn our deaths or feel empathy with the sick or weak. So we have to take responsibility for that ourselves.

    And the last part of your argument that implies that genetic engineering will lead to genocide makes no sence at all. This is not history repeating itself. This is progress.

  • At some point in the past, one of our primary ancestors lost the ability to properly process uric acid into urea, a metabolic skill most animals retain. The enzyme they make and use is uricase, and the gene for its production is still in our genome——but it has been jammed in upside-down, and produces only a squawk of nonsense, and not a useful enzyme. The consequence of this defect are some extraordinarily painful conditions, like kidney stones and gout. This defect can be fixed at its root.

  • One of the reasons that bears are able to sleep for long periods without producing urine is that their metabolism converts uric acid into urea, a material which itself is useful in their bodies.

  • 1. So the world has a choice use the tool or hope the world didn't need the tool they tossed out! Or as you say another tool worked just as well! 2. So your afraid your decendents will mate with superhumans and you can't stop thier freedom to do so or "your attempt to do so would be sick" I agree!! They will have freedom to remain natural or superhuman through mating! That wouldn't be sick it would be humans exercising freedom!

  • Just imagine... sheep growing wool 20 times faster than their normal rate, cows producing milk faster, harvesting energy from photosynthisis, harnessing the power of spider silk, growing corn or wheat plants that are immune to locust, disease, weather, and can be grwon any time of the year, and still be faster, human enhancement, perhaps we could even breed creatures that could aide us in terraforming other planets? We are playing god now, let us flourish and prosper!

  • too radical. that's the reason we have wars in this world...

  • I see! So a world with a much shorter list of motives to make war is too radical! Wealth weither you admit it or not makes us less prone to violence. Perhaps people in the 3rd world have less of a living standard to live for then those in industrialized nations. Consider this..Would you feel safer in the gettho of Detriot flashing a wad of cash or flashing the same wad of cash while walking through Aspen. Who are we to deny the world biological wealth and prosperity? We owe manking improvment!

  • I find it interesting how you keep saying that people who oppose your agendas oppose improvement. No. At least not completely. There are thousands of ways to make improvement, and what I see here is that you are trying to choose the easiest one. No, the easiest way will always be, in most of the cases, the trap. It's like choosing between an airplane and a ship. The airplane is faster, but if it crashes, the chances of survival are close to null. In a ship, however, it is easier to survive...

  • But it goes slower. So no matter how much you keep improving airplanes, the ship will always be safer. That is somatic gene therapy. There is nothing that germ line gene therapy can do that somatic gene therapy can't. The possibilities are infinite. So no, we aren't being stupid little conservatives... We're stopping greedy bastards!

  • nothing ...how about passing on and building on improvements! You really need to study more on the subject before you comment on it! You can go slow while I go fast ...that is your right just don't try to hold my family back because your affraid of losing the race! If your so dedicated to losing then why the fear of other who aren't affraid of science...could it be that deep down you know your wrong!

  • It wouldn't really be called "your family". More like your personal species. And your joy wouldn't really come from child-father love - it would mostly come from seeing things work. Could it be that deep down you feel guilt?

  • Call in what you will thats your freedom but its my freedom to alter my germline...My germline belongs to me and my decendants not you...!

  • It is easier to drive then walk 100 mls but if I fall I am less likly to die as in highspeed car crash.so using your logic we ban cars! Excellent! Keep going your proving my point for me! Lets stick to the saftey of walking. It would be so much safer if they walked instead of ran during olympic races! It takes longer but your chances of scraped kness drops dramatically!If we stand still we may even cut the risk levels down further baring a tree falling on ones head,although that would be natural

  • Two things: 1. we don't need germ line gene therapy for our survival as a species and for our well being 2. if we compare it to the titanic one more time, we could pretty much say that if it sinks, a major part of the human race goes down with it, not a group of passengers. you took my comparison a little bit too literally.

  • 1. How the hell do you know what we will need for survival...don't you think throwing out the worlds tools box out of fear is a little presumptious? 2. You assume my genetic super children will be unresistable to the rest of the world...the rest of the world will pull down thier pants and get some super cock and then everyones grandchildren will have supergenes and oh by the way something will go wrong and the world will end! Well I suggest you tell you children to stay away from the super cock!

  • lol... Two things (again): 1. (I can ask the same question to you)... It might be the worlds tool box, but not the world's final hope...

    2. Preventing GM humans from mating with non-GM humans is sick and all those problems can be avoided, like Einstein said: a smart person solves the problem, a wise person avoids it. Humans that have received somatic upgrades would be able to feel free to mate without worries because whatever goes wrong in gene therapy it doesn't pass down.

  • 1. So the world has a choice use the tool or hope the world didn't need the tool they tossed out! Or as you say another tool worked just as well! 2. So your afraid your decendents will mate with superhumans and you can't stop thier freedom to do so or "your attempt to do so would be sick" I agree!! They will have freedom to remain natural or superhuman through mating! That wouldn't be sick it would be humans exercising freedom!

  • It's not really a choice. It's an automatic [chemical] reaction that YOU will be influencing. That's why YOU need to be stopped, not them.

  • I know it's hard for you to accept. I know you believe it. Those men come from one person and that person is me. I know you say chronologically impossible. considering I was born in 1965. You don't want to know. Anyway they come from one sack, mine. Furthermore I hold the Key to the "Gay Gene". They wanted it to be an old white man they even was hoping it was the Benet Ramsey accused killer. Anyway I'll say it again DNA it. I can look at anyone of them and chances are I can tell you their parent

  • You can't argue with logic like that...

  • Some people refuse to vaccinate their babies because they believe disease to be the will of God. Some people stand in the road because they believe blunt-force-trauma to be the will of God.

  • A very good site for current information:

    "National Center for Biotechnology Information" google "ncbi". It has about 40 different databases on all research. It's a great resource.

  • "U.K. woman conceives breast cancer gene-free baby"...

    "A British woman is 14 weeks pregnant after conceiving the country's first baby guaranteed to be free of a hereditary breast cancer..."

    SEE: "BRCA" and "Preimplantation diagnosis"

  • 70% of the population can't even read or wright. Why are they in charge?? I'm all for improving the human race, at least make us smarter and destroy cancer and other problems.

  • wright (rīt)

    n.

    One that constructs or repairs something. Often used in combination: a playwright; a shipwright. ...from Old English wryhta.

  • this should be illegal genetic engenering should be illegal.  its disgusting

  • It's not disgusting in some ways. What if you could prevent diseases like Huntington's Disease or Tay Sachs disease which are death sentances for people. I agree that designer babies are wrong but it will inevitably happen because the world is liberal minded, and autonomy has precedance in society. It is almost impossible to argue against the decisions of autonomous people. Currently profit and personal decisions rule the world so if the designer baby is to be prevented the world has to change.

  • It's BIOCHEMISTRY that should be illegal. All those chemicals, floating around in our bodies—YICK!!

  • like totally!

  • I think id want my child to see or hear or have arms rather than not. Details like eyecolor are rubbish, as long as it would be physically healthy. Negative influences are already visible tho, China has a huge surplus of bachelors cuz boys are more more desireable offspring than girls.

    +Hitlers ravings are ridiculous, even if humans ultimately become a race of completely identical clones that have blue hair and blonde eyes or pink fur and no brains.

  • I'm a 7th grade student, and in biology we are studying genetic engineering. We have to write individual research papers and I am writing mine on designer babies. I found this video very informative.

    Thanks

  • did she say orgasm instead of organism on 1:00 ?

  • Nope

  • Genes are random. I believe we can control this behavior, and use it to develop and promote more healthier humans. Nature happends to destroy the weak, but what if no human was born physically and chemicaly weak and disorder relative to their environment? It provides a solution for medicine, which is to destroy problems before they establish.

  • they are random, but they are rare in this universe. whatever you do to them is irreversible and unnecessary. we can still make it with somatic gene therapy, nanotechnology, etc. and if anything goes wrong, the next generation will be a chance to start again. there will be no such chance if we decide to alter the human genome.

  • You can chose not to alter your germ-line and stay natural. I may chose to alter mine and take a unforeseen risk. Your risk is that I am right and my children end up healthier, stronger, smarter, more attractive, happier, and more successful. If I am right your lineage is left light years behind...but they may still benefit from the advancements of my children. If I am wrong why should you worry about my family and the personal decisions I have made in regards to such?

  • We don't own our children. We guide them. This obviously tells me that you're just one of those greedy assholes that just have children to feel better about themselves. We have children because it's our duty as a species. And we should accept them the way they are, no matter what, the only reason we shouldn't bring some children to the world is because we are sure that they won't have the chance to live a happy and successful life. (in the case of genetic deformations/genetic diseases/etc)

  • I don't own them...I just have a greater say in what happens to them then you do! Thankfully! Most people send there kids to better schools, doctors, sports programs to achieve the same result but genetics can achieve even more. So while you sit back and profess your love for your deformed children, I will proactively show my love for them by editing out the deformity and perhaps editing in some tools to be happier and more efficient!

  • Unless you live in poor conditions, more wealth does not increase happiness in your life. It's been proven 1000 times. And also, if we keep making life easy for our children, they become greedy. You obviously don't even know the basics of parenting, you're probably still a teenager. If this is still you after the birth of your child, I'll feel sorry for you as the father.

  • "Unless you live in poor conditions"...thats a pretty big fucken qualifier! Thats the whole point your trying to dismiss. In fact wealth does make people in poor conditions happier. Making life easy does not neccesarily relate to greed. Some of the richest among us are very generous..and many of the poorest will cut your throat for a dime. I have 3 boys who doing very well as a matter of fact. How is your parenting going!

  • Neither does it relate to happiness. (also, i didn't say that wealth doesn't make the poor happier... i said that all in all, you won't be happier than before if you are middle-class and you keep increasing your wealth...) Btw. try giving your children as much toys as you can, the best sports lessons, the best clothes.. etc. and see what happens!

  • BTW Painting a broad brush and declaring children with easier lives as greedy is a window into how you think. Very much like a person who declares all jewish people inferior...There is greedy and generous wealthy people as there is greedy and generous poor people. And BTW morally Superior and inferior people of all races. So lets get this straight You are willing to pass broad judgment on a entire class of people and you desire to impose your will on the Human race for thier own good! OK Adolf!

  • So you think I was using prejudice? LOL - Try inviting a child that lives in poor conditions to a high class lifestyle. He will be happy, or yes, very happy, but i can assure you that the child that already lived in wealthy conditions wouldn't even care about it. Why? You have a brain. Use it.

  • what you said was clearly a prejudice statement agianst people who are well off! Your statement fit the definition of prejudice to the letter! Does it really matter who you broad brush! OR is it politically correct to hate certain groups but not others? And You are telling people what they can't do! I am saying people have a choice to do it or to not do it! Choice=Freedom... Respect freedom or embrace tyranny Thats what I am saying. Why are you against freedom?

  • I'm against freedom, yeah, cuz if everyone was free, they could go out and kill some dogs, go burn some houses, shoot a couple of people, etc. What i do support, however, is personal freedom. Germline choice goes WAY BEYOND personal freedoms, it would be a living hell if there was a global, scientific movement to control people's minds through gene therapy. They would be nothing but marionettes whose brains were LITERALLY washed.

  • By definition freedom means you can't kill your nieghbor since that means you infringe on his freedom. Germline is a personal choice...you have the freedom to not use it..I would never impose my desire for germline on you and your family. But freedom is inherently a 2 way street that means you can't tell me how to run my life either!

  • Just like germline "choice" technologies would infringe on the freedom of your generation. LOL I do have the right to to tell you how to run your life.. erhm i mean.. our civilization! I'll have a say on whatever has the potential of changing the world i live in!

  • If this ever gets passed, I don't want to live in that kind of world.

  • Its already happening so you might as well kill your self!

  • You know, at first this seemed like a horrible act of playing god. But there are way too many stupid people in this world, who go around and do incredibly dumb things. Like voting for George Bush.

  • but there are, however, people like me who DON'T VOTE FOR BUSH, and especially DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD who are still against that. calling us stupid little conservatives is probably the first weapons those guys use on us. i am no conservative. i'm a left-wing environmentalist. suck on that!