Added: 3 years ago
From: dcoursey82
Views: 57,980
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (105)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What happened to us the "friendly" Americans? Seeing the engineer wave at 1:02 as he passed by brought on a memory pang; As a kid, I would pedal as fast as I could to get to the tracks whenever I heard the Eastbound whistle just to be able to wave and receive a wave-back from the engineer or extra whistling. I remember we'd tell one another about going to Federal prison if we'd ever got caught with "lucky" flattened pennys as it was proof we'd put coins on the track so we shouldn't show adults.

  • The great moments of our technical history....

  • Do these clips take place on what's now know as the MNRR Hudson Line?

  • @TEMPLE7D I looks like it is the Hudson Line.

  • J1-B Hudsons are my favorites.

  • @BossNigger4 There's one Mohawk left in a museum. They say it might run again in the future.

  • WOW!!!! Today's trains lack a lot compared to these!! Thank you for sharing!!

  • These Hudsons look great.

  • It really sucks they scrapped most of all the nyc steam engines especialy the dreyfuss and empire state really sad :(

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Dinosorable you know your shit.

  • My favorite Hudson is the 5212 at Sonoma Train Town Railroad. She's cute and beautiful and even has a Hudson whistle! And she survived!

  • Great video, I love the scene at :59

  • @HaloCE14 you are aware that Tornado took 13 years to build, at a cost of over 15 million dollars US? 

  • im more of a D&H guy there really werent any bad grades on the NYC,(besides the B&A)but man that is pretty cool!

  • I bought this video, and enjoyed the actual Hudson sequences very much; they are worth the price. But the narration does not match the action AT ALL, and the whole thing is so disjointed and jumbled that it is hard to watch, especially with someone who does not know what they are seeing. Very poor edit job, Sunday River. Kurt.

  • @HaloCE14 lol yeah , they have that E9 and her coaches they are in good condition, and yeah all the display is just rusting away.

  • @HaloCE14 yeah thats a good idea they should definitely do that i hope they do soon before she rusts away which is sad, they should have a barn for her to be in away from the elements.

  • @HaloCE14 aw man i should have knew she wasn't running because of the lack of money, but yep thats where shes at right next to the NS main lines going into the yard.

  • the dreyfruss hudson is the best one of all the hudsons.

  • Nice Video, I'm wondering if it's worth getting, the sounds in this recording don't seem to always fit in with the shot, I'm guessing some of it is dubed in? I'm looking for pure NYC sound... No dubs.. Looking into HR's NYC series as well But It's Shot In Ohio, Rather far from where i live on the NYC's old "West Shore line", Or CSX's Riverline now adays... And NYC's CMB.

  • Its sad there are no Hudsons left but I do know this guy in Indiana who has a 4-8-2 Mohawk #3001 its in pretty good condition but it has been sitting outside for years though

  • love this vid long gone nyc hudsons we will miss them all

  • I have been reading down. It is a crime that no NYC Hudson lives today. Having said that there is talk that a Mohawk or Niagra could be pressed into service. Here's where I become torn. I like to see steam in operation but the record shows that when something bad happens the locomotive can be out of service for years or even for ever. There are lots of examples but one has to look no further than the Pennsy 1361. As we are wishing let's keep in mind the realities. Watch what we wish for.

  • HaloCE14 wrote:

    "...none of these engines survive sadly"

    If the drawings still exist mabye you could all get together and build a brand new one. The British did it with the Tornado. I think they are talking about building a second engine too.

  • A good idea in theory, but the business of running excursion locomotives is different in the UK than in the USA. Even if a group were to succeed in building a new Hudson, where would it run?

  • @dcoursey82 It could be sold to a railroad, would give the builders money and the railroad a source of excursion revenue and publicity, although locomotives are less respected here than in Britain, so...

  • @dcoursey82 One good answer: nationalize the railroads like everybody else, and run some decent, frequent, and modern passenger rail while we're at it, too.

    Then it would work out great if private investors wanted to invest in a new NYC Hudson. I'd pay to ride it. God they're beautiful. Why is our country so backwards when it comes to transportation?

  • @Trainzcool Britain denationalized their railways recently. Also, the less government interference, the better.

  • @dcoursey82 possibly on old former New York Central Tracks? The idea wolud be brilliant because America only has a few steam locomotives that still work and we need alot more

  • @legotrainstudio13 ...again, good in theory, but in reality it simply is not realistic. Most if not all of the former NYC trackage now belongs to either CSX or NS who have a very strict policy of not allowing steam locomotives to run on their own power on the mainline. People need to educate themselves on all the technical hurdles involved in running a steam engine instead of thinking "I would like for one to run, therefore it should happen."

  • @dcoursey82 Do you know why CSX and NS no longer allow steamers on their mainlines? That's saddening. Back in the 80s we had the Chessie 614, N&W 611, and the NKP 765 running around the U.S.

  • @ACLTony ..People tend to think that CSX and NS's policies are made almost out of spite, and without any kind of sound reasoning behind it, but what it boils down to is that they are both businesses that are out to make MONEY...they have to sustain themselves somehow. Suppose CSX allowed a steamer to operate on its tracks....not only does it hold up other revenue runs, but it also attracts hordes of people following the train around, crowding around grade crossings to take pictures, and even

  • standing on the tracks as the train approaches. It's all very dangerous, and if an accident were to happen, who is liable? CSX. It just doesn't make sense from a business perspective to risk so much. In reality, CSX and NS are blameless...the problem is sympathetic juries and lawsuit happy miscreants.

  • @dcoursey82 I understand. My point stems from CSX and NS's ancestors (SCL & N&W) welcoming the steamers in conjunction with Operation Life Saver back in the 80s. I worked on the 614's train. Super experience. Plus the railroads got a tax break for running those excursions. You're right. Since then our society has become more lawsuit happy then ever. Plus the 1960s era CEOs and managers that were around in the 80s that were partial to steamers are retired and/or deceased.

  • @dcoursey82 How is a steamer holding up revenue service? If the steamer is pulling a train, it is revenue service. I can't see a problem with people wanting to see steam locomotives in action. It happens and I have not heard of anyone getting hit. People act stupid around diesels and electrics as well.

  • @Jemalacane Think of it this way...suppose I came to you, and asked if I could throw a party in your backyard. You hesitate because you work at home and your backyard is the main area you use to do your job, and thus generate income for yourself. Someone holding a party in your backyard would mean less hours for your to do your job, and less money in a typical work day. Even if I charged you a fee for its use, it still wouldn't offset the loss I'd get from losing part of a days work.

  • @Jemalacane Think of it this way...suppose I came to you, and asked if I could throw a party in your backyard. You hesitate because you work at home and your backyard is the main area you use to do your job, and thus generate income for yourself. Someone holding a party in your backyard would mean less hours for your to do your job, and less money in a typical work day. Even if I charged you a fee for its use, it still wouldn't offset the loss I'd get from losing part of a days work.

  • ...This is essentially the situation you have with Steam Operators and Class 1 railroads today. No steam excursion can be considered a revenue run because it's not generating revenue for the host railroad. Any profits made (If Profits are made) on the excursion goes to the event organizers. Sure, they could charge a fee for use of the line, but railroads like CSX and NS make way more money in a days worth of revenue runs than any steam excursion could.

  • @dcoursey82

    I've heard that the roads' main problem is the cost of liability insurance. For one thing, big, high pressure steam boilers have been known to go "boom" even in the days when there were lots of knowledgeable inspectors and maintainers.

    Steamers have to carry their own spare parts and special tools, since they can't expect to find them "out there."

    Water tanks are gone, and steamers need frequent fills.

  • @dcoursey82: Ever hear of Public Relations? CSX nad NS may run ads on Fox and elsewhere but those are strictly exercises in raising stock values. Public image and Marketing requires and effort on the part of the corporation.

  • Keep playing at those casinos and buying those lottery tickets! Wish you all the best in raising interest in preserving the two NYC steam locomotives in Maine.

  • What year were those taken in?

  • The L-3a NYC Mohawk, #3001, that resides at the NYC Museum in Elkhart, IN stands the best chance of any restoration to running condition. Of course, this takes lots of money. I was told at least a million bucks by a museum official at Elkhart. Hard to justify in today's rough economic times. Nontheless, it'd be a great engine to restore as it did freight AND passenger service including pulling the "Central's" famed 20th Century Limited on occasion.

  • I like Alfred Perlman. He did good things for his railroad. But he did not do the best job picking engines for preservation. The single Mohawk saved would have been very well accompianied by a Niagra and a Hudson. (sigh)

  • That one Mohawk, an L-2, the NYC donated for preservation was saved only because of some Selkirk shops employees who hid the engine from local management by literally piling boxes around it. When it was discovered in the early 60's the "Central" had no choice but to save it as it would have been, as was once said, "a public relations disaster" if it had done otherwise. Perlman was in no way interested in preserving NYC steam engines as he was in saving the "Central" itself in the 1950's.

  • Sadly no Hudsons survived into preservation but I wish they preserved at least 1.

  • I can't believe the streamlined Hudson didn't 'make the cut' for preservation. What a beautiful locomotive, and an equally beautiful streamlined consist. I wish there were trains like this again on the rails.

  • Well....there is a Chesapeake and Ohio hudson at the B&O train museum in downtown Baltimore, MD. It isn't the same as the NYC though

  • I was talking about the NYC Hudsons.

  • Ya I kinda figured nothing can compare to them

  • Holy shit. That streamlined Hudson is sick. I want to see steam on the Hudson Line.

  • A lot of this old film footage has dubed in sound after the fact. You can tell on most of these. Nice footage though.

  • Beautiful... on 0:37, that's a Pacific, (a K3-something???) not a Hudson.

  • Photographic proof that the USA is in decline. Thousands of people transported in style and speed without burning 1 drop of oil. All the money circulated by RR customers stayed right here in the USA.

  • @chaz1854 hey dude, coal is a fossil fuel, and many steam locomotives run on oil anyway

  • Great vid, esp. like the shot coming out of the tunnel.

    The PRR may have been the Standard RR of the World, but the NYC had class and the Water Level Route = Fast trains

  • It's too bad the sound is off.

  • I'm gonna say what everyone else is thinking...

    Diesels suck.

  • Who's thinking that?

  • Beautiful! The J-Class Hudsons were works of art. Thank you for posting :)

  • Great footage and never seen it before.The 20th Century Limited was known all the World and even here Down Under.

    Find some more footage and post it !!!

    Well done.

  • Other than the PRR K4s, this is my other passion !

  • BEUATIFUL

  • Sad that NYC didn't even save one of these. The Hudson was a contender for World's Fastest Steam Train.

  • Lets face it, 126 down hill with only 7 cars isn't that difficult. With the same load and gradient an N.Y.C Hudson should have breezed it. Un offcially a Merchant Navy class surpassed 126 down hill and took it to 130 on the flat with 14 coaches.

  • It is so very awful that the New York Central couldn't save some hudsons or the niagara's, but 3 locomotives survive from being scraped which are 2 mohawks and the famous #999.

  • NYC should have saved at least 1 hudson. But no they had to scrap all of them for no reason.

  • Sure, they needed the money and the president felt that there was no reason to save anything. We are lucky we have the two Mohawks around.

  • Where can we see the Mohawks?

  • I think one is in the Henry Ford museum in Indiana??? I think thats and L-2 and the L-3a is in Elkhart.  GO SEE THEM !!!

  • the Dreyfuss Hudson(the streamlined ones) look dam good in color and they have great whistles

  • It's so sad that the New York Central didn't even try to save ONE Hudson.:(

  • @Driverman2008

    I agree. They were some of the most remarkable steam engines in the whole world - an amazing record of speed, reliability, maintainance.

    If only that J Class wasn't hidden away in Roanoke or somewhere. Chapelon's steam masterpiece was quickly cut up - an 'embarassment' ... it was easily outperforming the ELECTRIC traction that had just "superceded' steam & diesel!

    It's the nostalgia of 'what ifs'. We all love.... "what if the little team had beaten the big team?" :-)

  • @Driverman2008 But there are other Hudsons around. Besides, there's also miniature replicas of NYC Hudsons that you can ride on.

  • @Driverman2008 all in the name of progress :/

  • @Driverman2008 - but one Mohawk is saved in St Louis. :)

  • Awesome video! Amazing quality!

  • Great to see my all time favorite engines running!

  • Awesome. Just simply awesome.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more