russian aircraft always have a habit of looking so good. Seeing as the Nazi's staffed NASA and put the US (not a criticism just fact) on the moon has that event really moved huimaity forward. Interested to know?
The US now has no real space launch system but Europe, Russia and others do.
Помню, как классно пиндосы и англичане обосрались и устроили истерику, когда Путин 2 года назад отдал приказ о возобновлении полетов нашей стратегической авиации.
That plane is copy of a plane, dang it! Sneaky russians - they always do planes that look like planes! So much of a plane? Plane copycat!
Actually I like all this "incriminations" of thievery because it would be called "shit" if it was worse %subject_plane_here%... But this was called "stolen" - it's like a compliment and mark of quality from western people... somehow...
@bsnighteye Да ты долбоёб овца тупая если так думаешь вы та сами и нихуя ни придумали вот и вас жаба берёт обезьяны смотри пак-фа истребитель нового поколения и глотай слюни только и можете по компу пиздить а так я бы тебе лицо бы поправил или в гармошку бы свернул урод ...
@bsnighteye Вот урод базарить только и можете а делать руки в жопе я бы тебе лицо с большим удовольствием поправил а насчёт самолёта да ты дебил если так думаешь не знаешь не пиши тупо выглядишь обезьяна лохов нашёл по еблу тебе бы дал с большим удовольствием.....................................
tu-160 is not a total copy of b1b it has a different look (no forward mini- wings for example), this projects were under way at the same time in ussr and US, and north-americans even speeded their work on their project when they knew, what soviets are going to be the first.
No one stole anything from any one, to steal is to take something, everyone just copies everyone else, china doesn't need to steal iphones to make iphone knock offs.
@Suyamu No, they along with the US, coppied the German v2 rocket design. The USSR was not the first into space, the Germans sent a v2 rocket into space in 1942. You just need to shut your little trap you dumb kiddo. You're a fcuking idiot.
@gypsykingg thats a fuckin myth wise guy if that really happen that the damn nazis will be a part of the space race too you dumb shit heres the reason why its a myth when that V2 rocket is about to leave the stratosphere it exploded and it crashed somewhere in central asia
@Acecombatrules59 The space race was about sending people into space and equipment into orbit, not reaching the lower limits of space you dumb ass. The rocket reached an altitude of 176 km, about 70km higher that what NASA considers to be space and over 100 km higher than where the stratosphere ends. How fucking retarded are you? You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and your lack of simple grammar, just proves, even more, how dumb you really are kiddo.
@tht1drnkrussian thrust vectoring was first invented by NASA and then first used on an operational fighter on the British AV-8, HMCS first invented by South Africa. And for the AK.. Please, that couldn't hit the side of a barn if you were standing in the barn. Nearly all of Russia's technology is a copy of the USA.
i've never seen so many aviation and aviation history experts in one place. faggots. This applies to all, regardless of the country origin. sofa theorists.
@442hoeky ever heart about a plane called concord? If the tu-144 look similar to some thing then its the concord and that one is not merican but an british french cooperation.
@friday3810 Look up the XB-70. The Concorde and TU-144 both look very similar to this aircraft. Concorde and TU-144 were both designed around the same time (the Tu-144 flew before the Concorde), but the XB-70 flew several years before either of these aircraft and is American. Nice try, though.
@cb11082 So? LOL it doesnt even look exactly like B1. A bit different wings and different body (or fuselage).
If it looks the same doesnt mean that it's stolen. All modern cars looks the same, so what, every car is stolen from original like (some toyota from 90's??).
Only thing that Russia stole from USA is T-4. WW2 bomber.
It was fully copied from American B-29 Superfortress.
@RealNarod28 Give me a break. Look at the overall line, the engine placement, even variable wings - it's totally a copy of the B1. An why not? The B1A was capable of Mach 2 plus, so they knew the design worked.
@cb11082 another brainwashed hey-hey-olololo-patriot-yankee, just like 90% of all americans. fortunetly, was in touch only with adequate and educated ones. watch some more fox news and future weapons on discovery channel
@Snutz21 And what's wrong with a patriot? Sure, some of us are brainwashed idiots, but some of us actually support our country because we were born here, not because of what we hear in our schools and newspapers. I personally think the Tu-160 is a fine plane, regardless of whether or not it is a copied design.
We (the Brits), actually gave away most of our jet engine developments, gratis, to the Americans and Russians. They didn't need to buy or spy, just had to ring Rolls Royce and they would arrange a trip round the factory and show them personally. (this actually happened)
Many Engineering Designs and Secrets were not stolen by other Countries but actually sold away by bought off American Traitors,British Traitors,and Russian (Soviet) Traitors themselves.
The safety history record of Russian aircraft have a lot of serious questions to be asked. Size and loudness means zilch to me for any aircraft with bad safety records and from a country the had secret designs they bought off from trader Americans who sold them to the Russians. A lot of those Ex-American Traitors selling their Soul to the Devil are now hiding living at their Homes in Russia right now.
The Cold War Era Russians(former Soviets) paid a lot of money to Western Traitors in exchange for Top Secret Original Designs from both American and British Aircrafts.
@KeskinTRS I don't think anybody disagrees with this. The fact is Hitler was an asshole and fucked up big time. There was a massive brain drain from Germany because he was a major fuck up. He will go down in history as the worst dictator ever. He had no clue when it came to war strategy. And he had a funny mustache.
@coldfarted I know, I´m not defending Germany. I just hate it when people or countries present something like they were the inventors. Did you ever say something and later the person says it back to you like it was his idea? Yea, I hate that.
@KeskinTRS Dude most people in the US are immigrants. If a foreign government is hostile to it's own citizens and they bring their ideas to a place where the government isn't hostile then so be it.
@DepakoteMeister Actually idiot many designs and secrets were sold by your own British Traitors themselves. This was a very common occurance during the Cold War Era.
@DepakoteMeister I hear ppl say that all the time. The U.S. aquired that knowledge and put it to the best use, bustinbg the sonical "barrier" b4 the brits could. Not a big deal just what happened. If the Brits had the knowledge they should have been getting it done, but they didnt. The U.S. had a better test section out at Edwards and a better designed plane(for sure) than the swallow.
tupolev original Tu-160 did not look like this it lost the competition and only when Myasishchev released by the time there project won they were in bankruptcy so they gave the program to Tupolev who copied the M-18 bomber which was upgraded to M-20 and M-22 Tupolev kept the nose from the original T-160 which look like the british vulcan the body just look up Myasishchev M-18 the usa copied it with the b-1 lancer
@SidewindeRinHD I don't think we can simply dismiss any Russian plane as a "copy" ... remember that Russians and Americans were, in many cases, working on designs for the same strategic purposes ... which totally justifies similar designs ... besides, on youtube the copycat arguments flies so much, one would think it was easy as a piece of cake to obtain top secret american blue prints ALL THE TIME and rebuild them in Russia. I mean c'mon ...
@Byron10301 Actually if you research it you would be surprised on how much effort russia and china put into stealing US info... not to long ago(2 years) russia hacked into the pentagon and stole designs on the F-35. Justifies "similar" not "exact" which this is...
@SidewindeRinHD your incorrect its a copy of MS-22 bomber a russian bomber that the USA copied from Myasishchev M-18 which is what the tu-160 were contract to make when Myasishchev won the bomber competition but at the time did not have as many workers to develop there bomber just look it up
@iEugene1994 NATO codename all russian aircraft...the bombers being the b series such as BISON,BLACKJACK and BEAR.the same goes for their fighters being the f series eg FISHBED,FLOGGER,FOXBAT etc etc
We are used to official names, that divided by first letters of design department(like КБ Туполев) and number of model, usually irregular intervals are allocated to different types of transport such as passenger, bombers, interceptors, etc.. Also different DD have their own specific areas , there is no Ka(ОКБ Камова), bombers, only twin screw helicopters.
P.S.
Also NATO names just sucks, they are ugly and the worst of all - they are official. We haven't off. names.
TU160 is very similar to B1 cause Russians copied his airframe from American B1 bombers. So russian copied much American bombers for example Russian copy of American B29 WW2 bomber.
B-2 is a new generation bomber with stealth, its not in the same category as T-160 which is a large fast bomber, USA has plenty of bombers in this category but NOT the B-2. There is nothing like B-2 in the world except the lesser capable f-117
Fuck the TU-160, All it does is fly around Russia on trainning missions and people SAY what it can do. The B1 on the other hand, well just ask all the DEAD Taliban Mother Fuckers what the B1 DOES do!
@SidewindeRinHD im more than away of the facts, fella. I was stating that the F22 hasnt yet proved itself in real combat, and it may never actually do so!
Hilarious reading the typical repeating of Soviet propaganda. You Russians are hilarious to read because you fools act like every single military product the USSR/Russia made IS the greatest thing every invented. Haha!
Hey Look! It's a B-1b Lancer, Duh( funny face ) I mean the over sized Soviet copy of the B-1b. Anyways I normally don't get involved in my countries planes our better than yours bullshit. But I've watched some vids on here of Russia being pissed off at China for copying the SU-27 and making China's version, the J-11. They shouldn't be saying shit. Just sayin !
@zabercrombie24 comparing b-1 and tu-160 is like comparing a lambo with a ferrari. They are both good and are both meant for the same purpose, but they are definitely not a copy one of the other. Russians have been experimenting with swing wing bombers long before the lancer, check tu 22 and tu-22m3. The fact that the aircraft look similar is because this is the optimal layout for that role, just like most commercial air liners look a lot alike. Needs dictate the shape.
Nope, it was designed a before the B-1A (the original, not the later "B" tactical bomber, like you said), and is in fact an evolution of the earlier, and more advanced Myasischev M-18 concept (from 1970).
The M-18 would arguably have been a better plane, though Tupolev had more political clout and better reputation when it came to making bombers.
The Tu-160 did copy design elements, just not from the Americans, but from Myasischev design bureau's M-18 concept.
To 5010Tomcat, even in these days of the bankrupt world economies, the "Usual Suspects"(Boeing, Lock-Mart and BAE) are pressing for a "Penetrating Bomber" for the USAF to fill a un-needed capacity. As a very Patriotic American Taxpayer I say lets buy a few wings of SU-34 Fullbacks and save the money. The B-1 was a reply to the TU-22M(which we totally overestimated). Rotary Weapons bays on "modern" US aircraft started with the A-5 Vigilante( the most beautiful US jet)
American use submarines and ships to deliver cruise missiles. Because the U.S. navy is larger and has presence around the globe, so there is no need for this type of vehicle to project power. High speed and low penetration was a tactic used in the 50s and 60s to avoid defense radars during the cold war. With the deployment of AWACS, that advantage went out the window. This is just another copy of American ingenuity (B1) without a good practical modern application.
177 likes are a combination of high population You Tube members with too much time on their hands like a combination Millions of Pro Red Communist Nation lovers,Serbian Idiots,Eastern European Still Brainwashed By Decades of the Iron Cutain Era Ideology since They Were Born In That Age ,and Pro Bring Back the Red Soviet Union Era Lovers.
@BBQFanNo1 Funny that you are talking about soviet propaganda when it looks like you where completely brainwashed by Yankee propaganda. Go watch more Fox news now.
The Red Evil Empire and never really died after the breakup of the Soviet Union. It just was asleep like Yugoslavia and Eastern Europe until the Red Fascist Stalin's return to power hellbent along with the Arab Nations on completely annilating the State of Israel. We are headed soon ahead for the Great End Time Apocalypse.
Just think Jimmy Carter and the Democrats wanted to scrap the B1 and every fast-large aircraft left in the United States in existence by 1982. While the Soviets (Red Russians) were just beginning to spend on building bigger-better-faster-louder than everyone else in the World. Reminds me of the ego Middle Eastern Arabs trying to build the highest Tower in the World. Russia and Saudi Arabia reminds me of Babylon aka The Tower Of Babel. Looks Biblically familiar with Revelation Apocalypse.
The actual design is similar to the Vulcan,Concorde, and SB-70 Valkyrie. You see early German aerospace design. Jewish Engineers of course. Who wants to buy them out first?
@Catmanfondoo Both Americans and Russians stole designs. Both stubborn arrogant assholes very near could have annilated almost all Humanity on Earth. Thankfully there is someone Good bigger than anyone in the Universe who prevented that.
@GTMustangRider SInce the rules of Physics that govern aerodynamics are the same for Russian and NATO designers, dont you think there will be obvious similarities in aircraft built on both sides for similar purposes?!!!
very beautiful design. not a b-1 copy, if memory serve it is as big as a b-52. i wish we had a squadron setting on alert. oops i forgot we don't stand nuke alert anymore.
For all of you saying one country ripoff another in designs, I suggest you check out a web page called Luft46. Nothing we have today is new. Almost every US and Russian Aircraft design of the last half century was drawn up on a German design board in the 30s and 40s. Still this is a beautiful aircraft, I love the "White Swan " label. and yes in Afghanistan the B-1B has been bad to the BONE.
@Papi1960R Do your research too about the history of Jets. August 1928 by Frank Whittle, but Hans von Ohain ring a bell son? Does Mr A. A. Griffith, who published a paper in July 1926 on compressors and turbines, also deserves credit ring a bell too?
@BBQFanNo1 Yes you are correct. I was being very general. In fact most turbine engine designs and innovations thru the 1960s in the UK and USA had "Whittle Turbine" referenced in their official and patent paperwork.
Im sure Rockwell is thrilled that Ivan ripped off the B1B Lancer and increased its size. at least they didnt paint it OD green. kinda like japan ripping off the Falcon and calling it F2.
@Erik0072 except not really. The F2 was developed in conjunction with Lockheed to full fill a similar but unique role for Japan. The F2 is slightly larger and has better range. You'll also be interested to know that a significant portion of the aircraft was built in the US. It was developed there due to military export issues between Japan and the US.
Tupolev's planes (Excludes MD-80 like passenger plane and IL's quad engines at the back plane or whatever it's called) stopped flying in the 1990's long before the Concorde stopped flying. The Concorde is the most recent SST built.
@MaRxHD Yeah and an SS-N-27 is still better than a B-2 Spirit... wow yaye!!!!! Oh and the sun exploding, thats better than SS-N-27 and B-2 Spirit put together! Although, stealth is.... less than needed in that case....
@guitarist4747 you gotta be shitting nigga. Can the B52, or B1, or B2 break Mach 2 sonic barrier and travel at 2,220 km/h speed? No? Can they carry long-range guided anti-ship and cruise missiles that can be launched at ranges of 300km to attack enemy ships/buildings/positions? No? Then they cannot be better than Tu-160, sorry
Keep in mind, the Tu-160 has 2 internal rotary launchers each holding 6 powerful cruise missiles, American bomber's don't have this :D fail
What idiots like you don't understand is that fact, that this isn't a car race. It doens't matter who is fastest. The import fact is the tactical concept in which a weapon is deployed.
For example, you don't have to break sound barriers if you can't be spotted by radar.
@GalaticSpaceHero Then there's no argument. The designer says 2200km/h, and NATO planes that intercept these when they come snooping over Japan or Canada confirm that speed. It's not such a immoderate speed anyway, the civilian Concorde flew at the same speed.
@OldDirtyRatbastard ok, they dont tell us nothing . They dont want us to know . Just get down in the bunker and hide when the sirens go off and hope the bomber drops his bombs on some other dumb son of bitch
Каквото и да измислиш е НАШЕ. Ако измислиш нещто друго , значи е мое . Товари портокалите и не ме занимавай с глупости!
grozd102 1 day ago
A copy of the B-1 which was conceived in the 1960s and the first protypes produced in the early 70s.
mardi06 1 day ago
humm? looks like the b-1....lol
yankee22167 1 week ago
russian aircraft always have a habit of looking so good. Seeing as the Nazi's staffed NASA and put the US (not a criticism just fact) on the moon has that event really moved huimaity forward. Interested to know?
The US now has no real space launch system but Europe, Russia and others do.
smilo996 1 week ago
Помню, как классно пиндосы и англичане обосрались и устроили истерику, когда Путин 2 года назад отдал приказ о возобновлении полетов нашей стратегической авиации.
Любо-дорого было посмотреть. Привыкайте, друзья.
burunduchalo 3 weeks ago 2
That plane is copy of a plane, dang it! Sneaky russians - they always do planes that look like planes! So much of a plane? Plane copycat!
Actually I like all this "incriminations" of thievery because it would be called "shit" if it was worse %subject_plane_here%... But this was called "stolen" - it's like a compliment and mark of quality from western people... somehow...
bsnighteye 1 month ago
@bsnighteye Да ты долбоёб овца тупая если так думаешь вы та сами и нихуя ни придумали вот и вас жаба берёт обезьяны смотри пак-фа истребитель нового поколения и глотай слюни только и можете по компу пиздить а так я бы тебе лицо бы поправил или в гармошку бы свернул урод ...
ZXZXZNikitaZXZXZ 1 month ago
@bsnighteye Вот урод базарить только и можете а делать руки в жопе я бы тебе лицо с большим удовольствием поправил а насчёт самолёта да ты дебил если так думаешь не знаешь не пиши тупо выглядишь обезьяна лохов нашёл по еблу тебе бы дал с большим удовольствием.....................................
ZXZXZNikitaZXZXZ 1 month ago
@ZXZXZNikitaZXZXZ Тарабарщина какая-то...
bsnighteye 1 month ago
So much of B-2 eh?
Boljev6 1 month ago
tu-160 is not a total copy of b1b it has a different look (no forward mini- wings for example), this projects were under way at the same time in ussr and US, and north-americans even speeded their work on their project when they knew, what soviets are going to be the first.
DerSturmerSS 1 month ago
And the tu-204 is a copy of the Boeing 757
tranceaddict704 1 month ago
Look at the TU-4, it is an exact copy of our b-29 super fortress, the Russians have copied many of our designs
tranceaddict704 1 month ago
@tranceaddict704 there is no need to look at it, TU-4 IS copied from B-29. that's the fact. Greetings from Russia
Snutz21 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
4NICK8TER1 1 month ago
Comment removed
4NICK8TER1 1 month ago
No one stole anything from any one, to steal is to take something, everyone just copies everyone else, china doesn't need to steal iphones to make iphone knock offs.
Grimdopple 1 month ago
Military Videos Comments: "No they didn't" "Yes they did" "No they didn't" "YES THEY DID!"
"NO THEY DIDN'T!"
videocommenter67 1 month ago 3
Tu-160... just another Russian rip off of American design
we3575 1 month ago
If you think so
we3575 1 month ago
@Suyamu No, they along with the US, coppied the German v2 rocket design. The USSR was not the first into space, the Germans sent a v2 rocket into space in 1942. You just need to shut your little trap you dumb kiddo. You're a fcuking idiot.
gypsykingg 1 month ago
@gypsykingg thats a fuckin myth wise guy if that really happen that the damn nazis will be a part of the space race too you dumb shit heres the reason why its a myth when that V2 rocket is about to leave the stratosphere it exploded and it crashed somewhere in central asia
Acecombatrules59 1 month ago
@Acecombatrules59 The space race was about sending people into space and equipment into orbit, not reaching the lower limits of space you dumb ass. The rocket reached an altitude of 176 km, about 70km higher that what NASA considers to be space and over 100 km higher than where the stratosphere ends. How fucking retarded are you? You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and your lack of simple grammar, just proves, even more, how dumb you really are kiddo.
gypsykingg 1 month ago
Comment removed
barthoedemaker 1 month ago
@barthoedemaker That comment makes a whole lot of sense..considering the B-1 is 7 years older than the Tu-160.
OlderG0ds 1 month ago
@OlderG0ds ACCHHHUUUUUU Tu22m.
themightyjoseph 1 month ago
B-1 Lancer --> speed 1.25 mach. Tu-160 Blackjack --> speed 2.05 mach. Russian rules!
nusutin 2 months ago
Looks like a hedgehog.
navyfreek1129 2 months ago
Happy 30th birthday, Blackjack!
fs10inator 2 months ago
fucking sorry ass commies get your own ideas,you fucking thieves
MrBornhead 2 months ago
@MrBornhead own ideas?? thrust vectoring, helmet linked weapon systems, a rifle that can work anywhere anytime.... do you want me to continue?
tht1drnkrussian 2 months ago 3
@tht1drnkrussian thrust vectoring was first invented by NASA and then first used on an operational fighter on the British AV-8, HMCS first invented by South Africa. And for the AK.. Please, that couldn't hit the side of a barn if you were standing in the barn. Nearly all of Russia's technology is a copy of the USA.
gypsykingg 1 month ago
@gypsykingg
yeah, Russia even copied your space rocket faster than you could build it and got first into space.
Suyamu 1 month ago
i've never seen so many aviation and aviation history experts in one place. faggots. This applies to all, regardless of the country origin. sofa theorists.
@cb11082 yep?
Snutz21 2 months ago 3
the german could build that too in more intimidating look and capability of the bomber plane
30sectodeath 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ЭТИМ КРАСАВАМ ПО 30 ЛЕТ СКОРО ГОРДИТСЯ НЕ ЧЕМ БУДЕТ ВООРУЖЕНИЕ У КИТАЙЦЕВ БУДЕМ ПОКУПАТЬ СТРАНА ВОРОВ!!!!!!!!!!
MegaZiglo 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ЭТО СЕЙЧАС СТРАНА ВОРОВ НИ ХЕРА НЕ ДЕЛАЮТ ВО ЧТО СТРАНУ ПРЕВРАТИЛИ А РАНЬШЕ БЫЛИ КАК КИТАЙЦЫ ЗАТО ВСЕ БОЯЛИСЬ
MegaZiglo 2 months ago
Ну ублюдки, скажите и это у вас срисовали?
romychur 2 months ago
hey look the russians stole the B-1 GET SOME ORIGINAL IDEAS YOU COMMIES
BeerMoneyLive 2 months ago
@BeerMoneyLive American CIA works so foolish that other countries can easily rob drawnings of military aircrafts?... I feel sorry for USA.
Viruner 2 months ago
it's the concord!
JonathanRinny 2 months ago
Awesome aircraft!
will1988a 2 months ago
@mrjkt123 And British concord look like Tu-144 actually. Also google for Sukhoi T4
clouster75 2 months ago
@clouster75 And the Tu-144 looks amazing similar to the XB-70 that flew years earlier.
442hoeky 2 months ago
@442hoeky ever heart about a plane called concord? If the tu-144 look similar to some thing then its the concord and that one is not merican but an british french cooperation.
friday3810 1 month ago
@friday3810 Look up the XB-70. The Concorde and TU-144 both look very similar to this aircraft. Concorde and TU-144 were both designed around the same time (the Tu-144 flew before the Concorde), but the XB-70 flew several years before either of these aircraft and is American. Nice try, though.
442hoeky 1 month ago
Stolen from America, just like 90% of all russian hardware.
cb11082 2 months ago
@cb11082 lol any facts? No. That's what i thought... just another troll who doesnt know a thing.
RealNarod28 2 months ago
@RealNarod28 ah look at the B1.
cb11082 2 months ago
@cb11082 So? LOL it doesnt even look exactly like B1. A bit different wings and different body (or fuselage).
If it looks the same doesnt mean that it's stolen. All modern cars looks the same, so what, every car is stolen from original like (some toyota from 90's??).
Only thing that Russia stole from USA is T-4. WW2 bomber.
It was fully copied from American B-29 Superfortress.
RealNarod28 2 months ago
@RealNarod28 Give me a break. Look at the overall line, the engine placement, even variable wings - it's totally a copy of the B1. An why not? The B1A was capable of Mach 2 plus, so they knew the design worked.
442hoeky 2 months ago
@cb11082 only thing in planes i mean :)
RealNarod28 2 months ago
@cb11082 another brainwashed hey-hey-olololo-patriot-yankee, just like 90% of all americans. fortunetly, was in touch only with adequate and educated ones. watch some more fox news and future weapons on discovery channel
Snutz21 2 months ago
@Snutz21 And what's wrong with a patriot? Sure, some of us are brainwashed idiots, but some of us actually support our country because we were born here, not because of what we hear in our schools and newspapers. I personally think the Tu-160 is a fine plane, regardless of whether or not it is a copied design.
AINGELPROJECT667 4 weeks ago
@AINGELPROJECT667 well, thanks for the adequate comment, i appreciate that
Snutz21 4 weeks ago
We (the Brits), actually gave away most of our jet engine developments, gratis, to the Americans and Russians. They didn't need to buy or spy, just had to ring Rolls Royce and they would arrange a trip round the factory and show them personally. (this actually happened)
aSkepticalman 2 months ago
before werner von braun was Pedro Ruiz Gallo
hospitalerknight 2 months ago
Many Engineering Designs and Secrets were not stolen by other Countries but actually sold away by bought off American Traitors,British Traitors,and Russian (Soviet) Traitors themselves.
BBQFanNo1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The safety history record of Russian aircraft have a lot of serious questions to be asked. Size and loudness means zilch to me for any aircraft with bad safety records and from a country the had secret designs they bought off from trader Americans who sold them to the Russians. A lot of those Ex-American Traitors selling their Soul to the Devil are now hiding living at their Homes in Russia right now.
BBQFanNo1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Cold War Era Russians(former Soviets) paid a lot of money to Western Traitors in exchange for Top Secret Original Designs from both American and British Aircrafts.
BBQFanNo1 3 months ago
it look's like the Concordsky.
TheHelder1976 3 months ago
its just like the b1 bomber
Crazycash314 3 months ago
Dude the US flew to the moon with german technology and the space program was directed by german workers. Search for "Werner von Braun".
KeskinTRS 3 months ago 37
@KeskinTRS I don't think anybody disagrees with this. The fact is Hitler was an asshole and fucked up big time. There was a massive brain drain from Germany because he was a major fuck up. He will go down in history as the worst dictator ever. He had no clue when it came to war strategy. And he had a funny mustache.
coldfarted 1 month ago
@coldfarted I know, I´m not defending Germany. I just hate it when people or countries present something like they were the inventors. Did you ever say something and later the person says it back to you like it was his idea? Yea, I hate that.
KeskinTRS 1 month ago
@KeskinTRS And the Russians used German records and some scientists as well....
we3575 1 month ago
@KeskinTRS a lot of rubish that you tell hear.
Direktus 3 weeks ago
@KeskinTRS Dude most people in the US are immigrants. If a foreign government is hostile to it's own citizens and they bring their ideas to a place where the government isn't hostile then so be it.
thebestsumoeva 1 week ago
Russian military gear always looks menacing
humphrey6000 3 months ago 2
Thats a fake copy of the US B1B Bomber....thats when russia used to steal the good ideas from US...
enriquequintero23 3 months ago
@enriquequintero23 so you mean russia stole the good ideas that america stole from the rest of the world
762Nikolai 3 months ago
@enriquequintero23 Shit happens. Just like when the US stole the all moving tailplane idea from the British in the race to break the sound barrier.
DepakoteMeister 3 months ago 20
@DepakoteMeister Actually idiot many designs and secrets were sold by your own British Traitors themselves. This was a very common occurance during the Cold War Era.
BBQFanNo1 3 months ago
@DepakoteMeister your right even when the chinese stole everything their government not there people
Acecombatrules59 1 month ago
@DepakoteMeister I hear ppl say that all the time. The U.S. aquired that knowledge and put it to the best use, bustinbg the sonical "barrier" b4 the brits could. Not a big deal just what happened. If the Brits had the knowledge they should have been getting it done, but they didnt. The U.S. had a better test section out at Edwards and a better designed plane(for sure) than the swallow.
BeLikeWater1000 1 month ago
tupolev original Tu-160 did not look like this it lost the competition and only when Myasishchev released by the time there project won they were in bankruptcy so they gave the program to Tupolev who copied the M-18 bomber which was upgraded to M-20 and M-22 Tupolev kept the nose from the original T-160 which look like the british vulcan the body just look up Myasishchev M-18 the usa copied it with the b-1 lancer
omnadrener1 3 months ago
Copy of B-1 almost completely
SidewindeRinHD 3 months ago
@SidewindeRinHD I don't think we can simply dismiss any Russian plane as a "copy" ... remember that Russians and Americans were, in many cases, working on designs for the same strategic purposes ... which totally justifies similar designs ... besides, on youtube the copycat arguments flies so much, one would think it was easy as a piece of cake to obtain top secret american blue prints ALL THE TIME and rebuild them in Russia. I mean c'mon ...
Byron10301 3 months ago
@Byron10301 Actually if you research it you would be surprised on how much effort russia and china put into stealing US info... not to long ago(2 years) russia hacked into the pentagon and stole designs on the F-35. Justifies "similar" not "exact" which this is...
SidewindeRinHD 3 months ago
@SidewindeRinHD your incorrect its a copy of MS-22 bomber a russian bomber that the USA copied from Myasishchev M-18 which is what the tu-160 were contract to make when Myasishchev won the bomber competition but at the time did not have as many workers to develop there bomber just look it up
omnadrener1 3 months ago
not black
zaromit 4 months ago
The hell is that , why that NATO can't call things by their names ? It's called "White Swan" , not "Blackjack" .
iEugene1994 4 months ago
@iEugene1994 NATO codename all russian aircraft...the bombers being the b series such as BISON,BLACKJACK and BEAR.the same goes for their fighters being the f series eg FISHBED,FLOGGER,FOXBAT etc etc
t1000eg 4 months ago
@t1000eg Any point of this?
We are used to official names, that divided by first letters of design department(like КБ Туполев) and number of model, usually irregular intervals are allocated to different types of transport such as passenger, bombers, interceptors, etc.. Also different DD have their own specific areas , there is no Ka(ОКБ Камова), bombers, only twin screw helicopters.
P.S.
Also NATO names just sucks, they are ugly and the worst of all - they are official. We haven't off. names.
iEugene1994 4 months ago
How do you think.Which plain is better(Tu-160 or b-2 spirit)?
MrDaxx85 4 months ago
@MrDaxx85 u mean the blackjack and the b-1
erer270 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TU160 is very similar to B1 cause Russians copied his airframe from American B1 bombers. So russian copied much American bombers for example Russian copy of American B29 WW2 bomber.
macieksoft 4 months ago
tupolev-160 come first, the americans created the b-1 they copied the tupolev
srheadshot1 4 months ago
@srheadshot1 Wrong...
SidewindeRinHD 3 months ago
@SidewindeRinHD ur are wrong !
srheadshot1 3 months ago
B-2 is a new generation bomber with stealth, its not in the same category as T-160 which is a large fast bomber, USA has plenty of bombers in this category but NOT the B-2. There is nothing like B-2 in the world except the lesser capable f-117
prjerry7 4 months ago
tu-160, russias b-2.
Mattc23q 4 months ago
the XB-70 beats this thing
TheMsdos25 4 months ago
@TheMsdos25 xb-70 is over
srheadshot1 4 months ago
Fuck the TU-160, All it does is fly around Russia on trainning missions and people SAY what it can do. The B1 on the other hand, well just ask all the DEAD Taliban Mother Fuckers what the B1 DOES do!
markab71 4 months ago
@markab71 so what? just cause the Russians doesnt use it doesnt mean its no good. take a seat and calm down.
stephenpprice 4 months ago
@stephenpprice It's hasn't been proven to be good at anything!
markab71 4 months ago
@markab71 Neither has the F22 but people state that it already owns the skies!
stephenpprice 4 months ago
@stephenpprice F22 has actually flown over 60 homeland security sorties... Learn your info...
SidewindeRinHD 3 months ago
@SidewindeRinHD im more than away of the facts, fella. I was stating that the F22 hasnt yet proved itself in real combat, and it may never actually do so!
stephenpprice 3 months ago
rusiia have used tu-160 in georgian and second chechnya war in 1999 and in georgia in 2008 with new modernised version of 2006 is good bomber too
more maturity please
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago
@markab71 now we have the f35 which can do ground attacks and dogfight.
TheMsdos25 4 months ago
очень хорошо, что они думают, что у нас только пара Ту-160 в строю...)))
sipadan77 4 months ago
not as good looking as the vulcan!!
damienmarktaylor 4 months ago
Looks a lot like a B1 Lancer.
wynstonsmyth 4 months ago
Hilarious reading the typical repeating of Soviet propaganda. You Russians are hilarious to read because you fools act like every single military product the USSR/Russia made IS the greatest thing every invented. Haha!
TheRazorbackpilot 4 months ago
Hey Look! It's a B-1b Lancer, Duh( funny face ) I mean the over sized Soviet copy of the B-1b. Anyways I normally don't get involved in my countries planes our better than yours bullshit. But I've watched some vids on here of Russia being pissed off at China for copying the SU-27 and making China's version, the J-11. They shouldn't be saying shit. Just sayin !
zabercrombie24 4 months ago
@zabercrombie24 :DDDDDDD b-1b - piece of shit in a toilet bowl
mAxZubov 4 months ago
@zabercrombie24 comparing b-1 and tu-160 is like comparing a lambo with a ferrari. They are both good and are both meant for the same purpose, but they are definitely not a copy one of the other. Russians have been experimenting with swing wing bombers long before the lancer, check tu 22 and tu-22m3. The fact that the aircraft look similar is because this is the optimal layout for that role, just like most commercial air liners look a lot alike. Needs dictate the shape.
DrHavoc1 4 months ago
@zabercrombie24
Nope, it was designed a before the B-1A (the original, not the later "B" tactical bomber, like you said), and is in fact an evolution of the earlier, and more advanced Myasischev M-18 concept (from 1970).
The M-18 would arguably have been a better plane, though Tupolev had more political clout and better reputation when it came to making bombers.
The Tu-160 did copy design elements, just not from the Americans, but from Myasischev design bureau's M-18 concept.
Abanamat85 4 months ago
Натовские пендосы даольтоники чтоли?Этож какому долбаёбу пришло в голуву ту-160 назвать бледжеком?
Ilya015 5 months ago
To 5010Tomcat, even in these days of the bankrupt world economies, the "Usual Suspects"(Boeing, Lock-Mart and BAE) are pressing for a "Penetrating Bomber" for the USAF to fill a un-needed capacity. As a very Patriotic American Taxpayer I say lets buy a few wings of SU-34 Fullbacks and save the money. The B-1 was a reply to the TU-22M(which we totally overestimated). Rotary Weapons bays on "modern" US aircraft started with the A-5 Vigilante( the most beautiful US jet)
Papi1960R 5 months ago
you Russians crack me up..
enterthekitchen 5 months ago
American use submarines and ships to deliver cruise missiles. Because the U.S. navy is larger and has presence around the globe, so there is no need for this type of vehicle to project power. High speed and low penetration was a tactic used in the 50s and 60s to avoid defense radars during the cold war. With the deployment of AWACS, that advantage went out the window. This is just another copy of American ingenuity (B1) without a good practical modern application.
5010tomcat 5 months ago
Doesnt matter how good the planes are when the pilots are a bunch of drunks.
riflemanjim 5 months ago
Comment removed
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
Comment removed
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
177 likes are a combination of high population You Tube members with too much time on their hands like a combination Millions of Pro Red Communist Nation lovers,Serbian Idiots,Eastern European Still Brainwashed By Decades of the Iron Cutain Era Ideology since They Were Born In That Age ,and Pro Bring Back the Red Soviet Union Era Lovers.
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
@BBQFanNo1 Funny that you are talking about soviet propaganda when it looks like you where completely brainwashed by Yankee propaganda. Go watch more Fox news now.
Dimdim316 4 months ago
@BBQFanNo1 Actually no, I'm a military history enthusiast and esspecially like aviation history. That is why I liked this video.
soundslave 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BBQFanNo1 Actually no, I'm a military history enthusiast and esspecially like aviation history. That is why I liked this video.
soundslave 4 months ago
The Red Evil Empire and never really died after the breakup of the Soviet Union. It just was asleep like Yugoslavia and Eastern Europe until the Red Fascist Stalin's return to power hellbent along with the Arab Nations on completely annilating the State of Israel. We are headed soon ahead for the Great End Time Apocalypse.
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
Just think Jimmy Carter and the Democrats wanted to scrap the B1 and every fast-large aircraft left in the United States in existence by 1982. While the Soviets (Red Russians) were just beginning to spend on building bigger-better-faster-louder than everyone else in the World. Reminds me of the ego Middle Eastern Arabs trying to build the highest Tower in the World. Russia and Saudi Arabia reminds me of Babylon aka The Tower Of Babel. Looks Biblically familiar with Revelation Apocalypse.
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
The actual design is similar to the Vulcan,Concorde, and SB-70 Valkyrie. You see early German aerospace design. Jewish Engineers of course. Who wants to buy them out first?
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
@Catmanfondoo Both Americans and Russians stole designs. Both stubborn arrogant assholes very near could have annilated almost all Humanity on Earth. Thankfully there is someone Good bigger than anyone in the Universe who prevented that.
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
Actually both the Americans and Russians are copycats.
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
No offense.
But to me that is the first plane to beat america's b-1 in looks and style
Plus everything else
remember my opinion
marcusazumo 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck the NATO
ivakomo 5 months ago
copy of b-1 lancer?
freetoskate4life 5 months ago
@freetoskate4life if it was a copy it would also have the same role as the b1 the 160 is a nuclear bomber primarily and the b1 is a tactical bomber
killman369547 5 months ago
@freetoskate4life looks similar but its quite a bit bigger, a lot faster, and carries bigger payload.
fillopygeesi 5 months ago
@Catmanfondoo do humanity a favor and please kill yourself.
NosferatuAaacaado 5 months ago
Это самый лучший и самый мощный стратегический бомбардировщик в мире так что НАТО отсоси
Spirtnoy 6 months ago
Fuck the NATO
Spirtnoy 6 months ago
super!!!!!
independent5551 6 months ago
russians love to build big things :D
AddeXtreme 6 months ago
jeditronjf
because of similar appearance?
SAVSAV1212 6 months ago
It looks awfully similar to the U.S. B-1B Lancer.
GTMustangRider 6 months ago
@GTMustangRider SInce the rules of Physics that govern aerodynamics are the same for Russian and NATO designers, dont you think there will be obvious similarities in aircraft built on both sides for similar purposes?!!!
blueinkbottle 6 months ago
Comment removed
GTMustangRider 6 months ago
very beautiful design. not a b-1 copy, if memory serve it is as big as a b-52. i wish we had a squadron setting on alert. oops i forgot we don't stand nuke alert anymore.
kenhorse 6 months ago
Свои называли его "Белый лебедь"!!! Враги называли "БлекДжеком" его.
Its called him the "White Swan"! Enemies called "Blackjack" it.
DobryjTiP 6 months ago
Россия и НАТО
Блэкджэк и ШЛЮХИ
Wirel2049 6 months ago 8
Damn B-1 Copy!
jeditronjf 6 months ago
For all of you saying one country ripoff another in designs, I suggest you check out a web page called Luft46. Nothing we have today is new. Almost every US and Russian Aircraft design of the last half century was drawn up on a German design board in the 30s and 40s. Still this is a beautiful aircraft, I love the "White Swan " label. and yes in Afghanistan the B-1B has been bad to the BONE.
Papi1960R 6 months ago 2
@Papi1960R Do your research too about the history of Jets. August 1928 by Frank Whittle, but Hans von Ohain ring a bell son? Does Mr A. A. Griffith, who published a paper in July 1926 on compressors and turbines, also deserves credit ring a bell too?
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
@BBQFanNo1 Yes you are correct. I was being very general. In fact most turbine engine designs and innovations thru the 1960s in the UK and USA had "Whittle Turbine" referenced in their official and patent paperwork.
Papi1960R 5 months ago
Tupolev's warplanes is most beautiful planes in the world!
Zuzyandr 7 months ago
16 are currently operational in russia with more being built.
Ortheos2006 7 months ago
The Bone is better.
dridley11 7 months ago
Im sure Rockwell is thrilled that Ivan ripped off the B1B Lancer and increased its size. at least they didnt paint it OD green. kinda like japan ripping off the Falcon and calling it F2.
Erik0072 7 months ago
@Erik0072 except not really. The F2 was developed in conjunction with Lockheed to full fill a similar but unique role for Japan. The F2 is slightly larger and has better range. You'll also be interested to know that a significant portion of the aircraft was built in the US. It was developed there due to military export issues between Japan and the US.
wsuflyboy 7 months ago
ПРИ ВИДЯ ВИДЕ БЕЖИТЕ САРТИР ЯНКИ
MsAllegator 7 months ago
Tupolev's planes (Excludes MD-80 like passenger plane and IL's quad engines at the back plane or whatever it's called) stopped flying in the 1990's long before the Concorde stopped flying. The Concorde is the most recent SST built.
DJ727ROBLOX 7 months ago
Addition: Concorde's better.
DJ727ROBLOX 7 months ago
B-2 spirit is still better
MaRxHD 7 months ago
@MaRxHD man, the spirit is in a different bomber class than the TU-160, the B-1 is the equivalent to this aircraft.
harris3693 7 months ago
@MaRxHD Yeah and an SS-N-27 is still better than a B-2 Spirit... wow yaye!!!!! Oh and the sun exploding, thats better than SS-N-27 and B-2 Spirit put together! Although, stealth is.... less than needed in that case....
mattmatt115 7 months ago
B52 is better and so is the B2 oh yea and the B1
guitarist4747 8 months ago
@guitarist4747 you gotta be shitting nigga. Can the B52, or B1, or B2 break Mach 2 sonic barrier and travel at 2,220 km/h speed? No? Can they carry long-range guided anti-ship and cruise missiles that can be launched at ranges of 300km to attack enemy ships/buildings/positions? No? Then they cannot be better than Tu-160, sorry
Keep in mind, the Tu-160 has 2 internal rotary launchers each holding 6 powerful cruise missiles, American bomber's don't have this :D fail
White Swan all the way!
tanker1408 8 months ago 21
@tanker1408 What are you talking about? Both the B-1B and the B-52D have rotary SRAM launchers.
Sloane100 8 months ago
@tanker1408 rotary launchers are quite fimilar on the B-52 and B1-B platforms. Until you have work on of these jets piss off.
And I am sorry to tell you that the B-2 can reach out without the needed gas of the Tu-160, which is a pure dog.
verret63 5 months ago
@tanker1408
You have no ideal what the fuck you are talking about. All you are, is being hooked on soviet propaganda.
PfhUkJiu101 5 months ago
@tanker1408
What idiots like you don't understand is that fact, that this isn't a car race. It doens't matter who is fastest. The import fact is the tactical concept in which a weapon is deployed.
For example, you don't have to break sound barriers if you can't be spotted by radar.
PfhUkJiu101 4 months ago
@PfhUkJiu101 That's only a valid point for the B2.
OldDirtyRatbastard 4 months ago
@tanker1408 2,220? Com on ! sounds like propaganda . if its so fast then it should catch the BlackBird , which no russian aircraft could!
GalaticSpaceHero 4 months ago
@GalaticSpaceHero The Sr-71 was much faster, 3500 km/h. Looks like you've got a problem between miles and kms.
OldDirtyRatbastard 4 months ago
@OldDirtyRatbastard No, i wanted arguement about how fast it was ...
GalaticSpaceHero 4 months ago
@GalaticSpaceHero Then there's no argument. The designer says 2200km/h, and NATO planes that intercept these when they come snooping over Japan or Canada confirm that speed. It's not such a immoderate speed anyway, the civilian Concorde flew at the same speed.
OldDirtyRatbastard 4 months ago
@OldDirtyRatbastard ok, they dont tell us nothing . They dont want us to know . Just get down in the bunker and hide when the sirens go off and hope the bomber drops his bombs on some other dumb son of bitch
GalaticSpaceHero 4 months ago