Added: 1 year ago
From: JulietteMorrison6
Views: 115,430
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (83)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Great track. Saw them play this live in Bournemouth in 1964 when I was at school. Brian Jones was so cool with his almond shaped Vox pale green guitar, I clearly remember that. Bill plays a mean bass on this and it is SO much better than the Beatles version, they did wonders with it, turning it into a wild blues rock song when the Beatles made it sound like country and western!

  • love brians guitar :)

  • funny.. mick jagger was, ehm, not that pretty, but then looks kinda cute... they -all- did back in the early sixties - was the same with the beatles! how come? funny.

  • Keith looks like George Harrison

  • Brian Jones forever!

  • that hollow-body bass sound!!

  • beatles are amazing but I'd have to say the stones are better just because they have more albums of quality stuff. 2 bad the beatles couldn't keep it together as long as these guys did, some of their best albums came out after the beatles broke up!

  • The guitar solo of Brian Jones is incredible, great slide!!!.The Stones version is better, more energy, punchy!!!

  • :D this sounds so funny, i'm used to the beatle version.. but this one actually is very awesome as well xD

    i guess i love both the versions then :D

  • i like both versions

  • Paul y John cedieron "I Wanna Be Your Man" a los Stones que la grabaron y publicaron en single (con "Stoned" en la cara B) antes que Beatles editasen el "With The Beatles" con "I Wanna..." como 4º corte de la cara B. Tecnicamente el original es de Stones y Beatles son los que versionean. Según yo lo veo tenemos dos grandes temas por el precio de uno. Es la misma canción pero la concepción musical es radicalmente distinta.

  • 1/11/63 is the date.. from Bill Wyman's book

  • This is so much better than The Beatles version. just sayin.

  • one must acknowledge Mick's supreme hauteur and giant mouth which got everyone's attention back in the day. As they used to say, Mick's mouth was so enormous - he could French Kiss Australia!! Indeed.

  • ma fome esta version MEJOR LA VER DE LOS Beatles

  • The two bands respected each other and were good friends. There wasn't any competition between the two. Why can't people understand that?

  • Beatles version is vastly inferior, in my opinion. This is a screaming r and b version, Stones style, wild and dangerous while the Beatles original is pure pop. 

  • @RodRollingStone ''wild and dangerous''...you're an ignorant.

  • @msanm5 Yes, it was (quote) "wild and dangerous" in the context of the times. So Rod is right and you are wrong. Simple.

  • Funny how Keith behaves like a Beatle towards the end of the song.

  • no mames las dos versiones son buenisimas pero me encanta mucho la de los stones aunsiendo bleatle maniaca de corazon me encanta brian jones komo toca su guitarra

  • The Stones version is more rawer and carries that bit of danger.

  • People don't seem to realise that there can be more than one good band in the entire history of the world.

  • imagine what would happen if beatles lasted 40 years ???? OMG, treasure that would never been discovered :)))..... great stones, great beatles

  • @ecermusic: Of course the can ! That's not the point.The problem is that, as far as i know, they recorded it after the Stones, and were not able to compete with the Stones on that specific song. Their own ! For the rest, even if I am a Stones fan, I can easily admit that The Beatles were generally more talentuous and creative. But this is a mistake. That's all !

  • @aguycalledsteve well i don't know The Beatles version is better because listen to this one, listen carefully, forget about all the bass bulls***, listen carefully, now listen to The Beatles version. sound different? of course, this version sounds so empty, almost as if it's flawed, now The Beatles version has solid sound and it just sounds better

  • @aguycalledsteve ya but it was written by lennon and mcartny

  • @700utuber but the

    stones paly it much better it´s more rock n drug not like fuckin fag pop beatle

  • how much higher could a bass go?

  • stones took the john and pauls song and rockafied it. beatles did it later and made it sound girly

  • The Beatles are better

  • Best ever band!!! The Rolling Stones!! Love Love Love my rolling stones!!

  • @imaStonesFan The Beatles version

  • @imaStonesFan Beatles all the way

  • lol i wanna be your man lolololol

  • McCartney y Lennon componen.

    Stones publican la canción original.

    Beatles versionean a los Stones. I'm Beatles fan.

  • I love BOTH versions. So there :P

  • Brill! Vinyl LPs are consigned to the loft but you can guess my age from my response? I never was a Beatles fan.

  • Damn this song is short. 

  • esta bueno

  • Excellent. 

  • The Beatles version is too jumpy. Love them both but love this version better

  • Still cannot understand why the Beatles recorded that song. A real mistake! They sound like a ridiculous 'ballroom' band, compared to the Stones... That's the difference between rock and pop. That's all...

  • @aguycalledsteve Well they actually wrote it. They can perform their own song at their discretion.

  • I like this guitar solo for how RAW it sounds! Like he was drunk when he played it! The sound Pete Townshend would imitate later

  • Perfect song...when I'm tired and I listen a rolling stones song I feel full of energy!

    cause rock ( I love rock) is true music...not this pop what the 95% of teens listen...thank god I am in the other 5% :DDDD

    Thanks for uploading! Awesome song!

  • The rollings stones are stealers!!

    Shame on Mike Jagger!

  • @Beatlesandchopinlove Lennon/McCartney gave this song to the stones you idiot. Why are there so many Door Knobs in the world???

  • The rollings stone have stolen this music to the Beatles.

    Shame on Mike Jagger

  • this version is very rock! but i like more the beatles' version

  • This is a really great cover. I love The Rolling Stones just as much as The Beatles.

  • Beatles version is better, though it's a crapy song none the less, Rolling Stones are a much better in my opinion.

  • like this better than the beatles one.

  • Why can't we just agree that both the Beatles and the Rolling Stones are great bands?

  • new stones fan everybody! any suggestions of videos? preferably early stuff

  • @yooperwholigan13 hey i recomed you... the spider and the fly , who's driving your plane , i'm a king bee , happy , plundered my soul , you gotta move , let it bleed and the whole taylor legacy, feed your ears pal !!

  • @yooperwholigan13. All of them, man. All of them....

  • @yooperwholigan13 work up with Time on my Side, Little Red Rooster, Tell Me, than move into Mothers little helper, Heart of Stone, Last Time, Route 66, all over Now, than move into Sympathy fo the Devil album.....

    then Let it Bleed ......tons of stuff.... Satisfaction, As Tears go by, Paint it Black, Play with Fire,.....

  • The STONES doing PUNK in 1964!!!....(talk about being ahead of your time folks) AND THE STONES DO IT BETTER THAN DEM BEATLES!.....Its much more nasty & erotic ....

  • @FOSEEBOY Hahahahahahaha!! I disagree with you, The Beatle are way better even if the Stones out lasted them, Beatles Music LIVES!!!

  • @FOSEEBOY If this is punk Revolution 9 is heavy metal

  • I Love This video

    Thank you JulietteMorrison6

  • beatles do so much better!!!!! i dont realy like the stones either

  • la neta esta chida pro de los beatles es mucho mejor pro a mi me gusta mucho los

    rolling stones pro ay qe saber perder

  • As much of a Beatles fan I am, I absolutely love this version. I love the bass line!!

  • @Plunkett1916 What I love about it are Brian Jones' slide guitar chords.

  • @Plunkett1916 Haha! You took the words right out of my mouth!

  • Bout time somebody put the stones version of this amazing song up!

  • Both Versions are good

  • Like BOTH versions

  • beatels do it better!

  • beatles version is way better. just sayin.

  • @kookie43 that is your opinion, Stones version is more raw and has better bass

  • @kookie43 It depends on the style you like... beatles have...relaxing music ... rolling stones are more flame me up :P

    I can't find the right words right now to tell you what I mean..."hoe you understand" what I mean hahah

  • @kookie43 how can you say that when brian jones, bill wyman and keith richards totally rock this?

  • @kookie43 No Stones much better

  • @kookie43 yeah

  • @kookie43 its really really not!

  • @kookie43 How? It's fucking shit compared to this?

  • love it. great footage!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more