lol it looks like a beefy dodge magnum... does anybody know what the base price will start at? (no doubt at least $38,000USD... at least i think that's around the coupe/sedans base price)...
This is not a crossover SUV. It's a sport wagon. Cadillac already has a crossover SUV that will replace the SRX in development, it too has already been spied.
It's not just a station wagon. They're called sport wagons. Alot of the luxury automakers have them in their lineups. They have more sedan like lines than actual station wagons and are far sportier. Do some research before commenting.
You've said nothing. Station wagons have always had most the same lines as their sedan versions, and the only reason they're calling them "sport wagons" is that "station wagon" has a stigma of being a stale family car since the 80s. It's still the same body style. If I took a minivan, threw ground effects on it and called it a "sport van", it doesn't mean shit, it's still a mini-van.
Sooo, you're saying, 'Same shit, different shovel'? Well, consider where the term 'station' came from for the station wagon. Most modern wagons, or estates in Europe, are more like their sedan counterparts than the old Station Wagons. Station wagons were often worse at handling, had terrible fuel costs and were aimed at a certain market. Sport Wagons/Estates are also aimed at a market and they handle nearly as well as sedans.
havent seen this yet
mi3pwns 2 years ago
in the cts coupe video he said that production was in spring!
YoungDeanPimp83 2 years ago
lol it looks like a beefy dodge magnum... does anybody know what the base price will start at? (no doubt at least $38,000USD... at least i think that's around the coupe/sedans base price)...
quacktackular 3 years ago
it looks too long... would like it more if it was shorter, to have more modern look
nonie89nef 3 years ago
i fuckin love the cts but this just seems like a bad idea. i mean who would honestly choose the wagon over the coupe or sedan.
derk702 3 years ago
i would
1001PS 3 years ago
I would...
ScorpioFuror 2 years ago
this car is dead
woegieboegie 3 years ago
did u mean GM is dead !
emforty2 3 years ago
This is not a crossover SUV. It's a sport wagon. Cadillac already has a crossover SUV that will replace the SRX in development, it too has already been spied.
PDC1987 3 years ago
lol the micheal jackson mobile its so gay haha buy an audi
kyleeagleton333 3 years ago
It'll probably be called a crossover like the SRX when clearly it's just a STATION WAGON.
It's just a term car companies want to distance themselves from. Purely marketing.
FusilliJerry82 3 years ago
It's not just a station wagon. They're called sport wagons. Alot of the luxury automakers have them in their lineups. They have more sedan like lines than actual station wagons and are far sportier. Do some research before commenting.
PDC1987 3 years ago 2
You've said nothing. Station wagons have always had most the same lines as their sedan versions, and the only reason they're calling them "sport wagons" is that "station wagon" has a stigma of being a stale family car since the 80s. It's still the same body style. If I took a minivan, threw ground effects on it and called it a "sport van", it doesn't mean shit, it's still a mini-van.
A rose by any other name...
FusilliJerry82 3 years ago
Sooo, you're saying, 'Same shit, different shovel'? Well, consider where the term 'station' came from for the station wagon. Most modern wagons, or estates in Europe, are more like their sedan counterparts than the old Station Wagons. Station wagons were often worse at handling, had terrible fuel costs and were aimed at a certain market. Sport Wagons/Estates are also aimed at a market and they handle nearly as well as sedans.
fulbore 3 years ago
the front and rear really doesnt look like that its just a prototype
jameswwe2 3 years ago
how bout a CTS-V wagon?
chromebomb 3 years ago 2
that will be delicious!!!
Pinkdeathrose 3 years ago 2
Getting groceries in under 5 seconds! :-)
kennycreeper 3 years ago 3
It'll be a nice competitor for the M5 wagon and E63 AMG wagon
Iridium725 3 years ago
Hmm, I don't think it'd be in the same class. But, as a wagon fan, it looks ok, and the length is ok too.
fulbore 3 years ago
Maybe it will be a crossover SUV!
SamuraiClinton 3 years ago
The camoflauge was probably created to make it look like a wagon, when it doesn't actually have to be.
Looks can be desceiving
rizexagainst 3 years ago 2
Perhaps it might be marketed as a Crossover SUV!
SamuraiClinton 3 years ago 2
How do they spot these things?? Awesomes video
Avatarofvideos 3 years ago 5
front looks nice but rear just looks like crap
jnfviet 3 years ago
you cant even see the rear end. and you just saying it looks like crap cause its a wagon.
cessnacruzer 3 years ago 5
@cessnacruzer they're beautiful.
itisian 1 year ago
wagons are for LOSERS¡ why cadillac have to destroy the awesome look of the CTS on a wagon
BAD Move CADILLac
juanxl 3 years ago
Oh yeah, that's what Cadillac needs! It's actually the CTW. YEAH! Go Cadillac!
GMminivans9968 3 years ago 3
Umm the CTS Coupe? Isn't that already known as the XLR? I mean it's a convertible, but practically a coupe!
banstaman 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wagons are pretty stupid
Aaqil5000 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Um.....
I don't even know how to respond.
Is this their idea of going after the Dodge Magnum R/T?
MajorCovert 3 years ago
Wagon!?
jink08 3 years ago
NICE!
35612 3 years ago 4