Just to clear some things up...in this film Bloodrayne 2 "The Preacher" character is not a Fire Preacher...or a Preacher at all. He is a con man pretending to be a preacher...traveling the wild west conning the towns people of their valuables, savings, and possessions...
It should also be noted that Inside the bible in front of him is a compartment where he hides his gun. He is not a religious man and would slice your throat for a nickel. This actor plays the role perfectly, and brought darkness, and humor to the film which was needed.
He just opened a new dimension of bad acting. It physically hurt how over the top he went with voice and movements. Now I'm an avid filmfan, and I've watched everything worthwile from the 1930's upuntil this era, from western to cult to anime, you name it. And I'm going to avoid this "Movie" as if it where the flaming gates of hell.
hehehe yeahs isn't it cute how he can make actors that if lead well do just fine do ...weird things! I mean you begin to ask yourself how many of them we're physicaly drunk while shooting on the set!
I mean a firepreacher? Wouldn't act like he had just thrown the winning ball!
Pretty much depends on how much you liked the first one. There's more action in this one for sure, and it doesn't have silly wigs or a half-naked Meat Loaf. So yeah, it is better.
Can't recall any bites, a random cowboy does give her some blood at one point though. Billy The Kid and his merry friends bite lots of people (one kid too).
Yes, I did. It was really good for the last 30 minutes, which is when the action took place. But there was about an hour of set-up before that, and aside from this scene, it was kinda boring. But the last third make this movie worth watching.
Only good character in that movie.
g0mmyg0mmyg0m 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just to clear some things up...in this film Bloodrayne 2 "The Preacher" character is not a Fire Preacher...or a Preacher at all. He is a con man pretending to be a preacher...traveling the wild west conning the towns people of their valuables, savings, and possessions...
TheFilmfan007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It should also be noted that Inside the bible in front of him is a compartment where he hides his gun. He is not a religious man and would slice your throat for a nickel. This actor plays the role perfectly, and brought darkness, and humor to the film which was needed.
TheFilmfan007 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheFilmfan007 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheFilmfan007 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheFilmfan007 1 year ago
Comment removed
VictoRobCastro 2 years ago
I think he's been drinking too much of that "nectar at the bottom of the bottle".
LeCreuset05 2 years ago
sucks that he dies
ktkid 3 years ago
But what a way to go!
Messengus 3 years ago
hahah, my dad rented this movie for me.
hahaha, this scene maded me chuckle.
is it weird, i find
the preacher strangely cute ?
=]
Killerzfairys213 3 years ago 3
o yea, he's cute.... and he really redefines church, doesn't he.
damn, i love how he uses Billy's accent at 0:47-52!
overdramaticfreak 3 years ago
isnt this the guy that plays Norman Bridewell in Lifetime's show called Blood Ties?
pixie453 4 years ago
That's him alright.
Messengus 4 years ago
This scene alone is DEEP HURTING!
UVCW 4 years ago 4
I think Michael Eklund is a very good actor
better in some things than in others
rattyann 4 years ago 5
He just opened a new dimension of bad acting. It physically hurt how over the top he went with voice and movements. Now I'm an avid filmfan, and I've watched everything worthwile from the 1930's upuntil this era, from western to cult to anime, you name it. And I'm going to avoid this "Movie" as if it where the flaming gates of hell.
freakhoofd1 4 years ago
100% right
Glumetzu 4 years ago
hehehe yeahs isn't it cute how he can make actors that if lead well do just fine do ...weird things! I mean you begin to ask yourself how many of them we're physicaly drunk while shooting on the set!
I mean a firepreacher? Wouldn't act like he had just thrown the winning ball!
masticina 3 years ago
this movie is amazing, uwe boll can't do wrong.
mikamage 4 years ago
and is it better than the first one?
recaltomalo 4 years ago
Pretty much depends on how much you liked the first one. There's more action in this one for sure, and it doesn't have silly wigs or a half-naked Meat Loaf. So yeah, it is better.
Messengus 4 years ago
cool... and does she bite anyone?
recaltomalo 4 years ago
Can't recall any bites, a random cowboy does give her some blood at one point though. Billy The Kid and his merry friends bite lots of people (one kid too).
Messengus 4 years ago
ok, thanks
recaltomalo 4 years ago
funny... the movie lookes good, did you see it?
recaltomalo 4 years ago
Yes, I did. It was really good for the last 30 minutes, which is when the action took place. But there was about an hour of set-up before that, and aside from this scene, it was kinda boring. But the last third make this movie worth watching.
Messengus 4 years ago
is it better than the first one?
( hope it is)
recaltomalo 4 years ago