Also, major LOLs at "hotter than the surface of the sun". The corona surronding the sun is 3,000,000 °F. This genius is using a blowtorch to burn through a piece of charcoal?? Charcoal is designed to burn, duh. 3,000,000 °F would instantly vaporise it.
@spentfromnz law of conservation of energy. the people don't know or cannot understand this very simple fact. there are many energy sources around and we can convert this energy to usefull for us but is impossible by the laws of nature to "create" energy, as many people think.
All you conspiracy theorists need to stfu on subjects you don't fully comprehend. The reason this technology has not taken off and never will is because it takes more energy to split the water into a gas than is actually produced by burning the gas. This may be a hard concept for some of you retards to fathom, but water doesn't just simply burn on it's own, it need to be electrolysed to separate the hydrogen and oxygen atoms, which takes a lot of energy to do.
Did anyone catch the sleight of hand comment there at the very end by the woman reporter? This is why this technology isn't widespread because the bilderberg's and bankers et al haven't yet figured out a way to make money off of it. They want to milk the oil for every last cent before they start charging the slaves and sheep for water and solar power. We're all fucked unless we all become independent of them. Figure this shit out yourself and when you do help your neighbors until it's widespread
The problem here is quite simple. Conservation of energy. Unless something truly incredible and inexplicable is happening it will take more energy, in the form of electricity, to create the gas than will be released when it is burned.
That's the sad truth of reality :(. No government conspiracy. No big oil bust jobs. Just math.
they just forget to mention that making hydrogen out of water requires a great amount of energy.... it is exactly the same energy that is released during combustion... this is why we are not filling our tanks from the TAP. OK... they say it enhances combustion efficiency... who knows...anyways i´ve never seen mileage data posted on the net.
if you put the technology into cars, you still need electricity AND water. car manufacturers are just cutting out the water part because its pointless
@dimiTTar I'd love to see government tax on water, with people filling their cars with rain water, selling black market bottles of Evian and breaking into resevoirs.. yes!
Can anyone say if the water used should be salt water or fresh water? Or both? In case of fresh water this kind of technology won't become very popular...
I assume it's fresh water but using desalination technology salt water can be used. You can even extract water from the air so I cant see why his invention shouldn't go mainstream soon.
97% of all water in this planet is salt water, 3% is freshwater. Desalination can be used but it's not cheap to do. If it were, we wouldn't have 18% of Earth's population suffering from lack of safe drinking water. From that 3% which is fresh water, 2/3rds is in ice form in Antarctica and Arctic and the rest is underground. Only 0.03% is the water you can actually see in lakes, rivers and ponds
Freshwater is becoming the new oil. Soon out of oil, soon out of water
for the simple reason: this is complete rubbish and nothing else. What have the governments to do with it, anyhow. If there is technology that really creates the utility "inventors" claim, then there is no way to stop it. But this is just not the case here. Here, it is just a scam and nothing else. This Billy Bob should go to the circus, ahahahahahaha.
@HansiKursch666 its not the government, its major corp.s like OIL, CAR, and ENERGY industries as a whole. They knock out new tech because it compromises their service base. I have no way to prove it but if you took a good look I'm sure you'd find a prominent pattern.
@HansiKursch666. It's not the GOV. It are the gas, oil, and automakers that are doing it. The automakers have, and have had the ability to create cars and trucks which get 35+ mpg for years now - but they won't because of the almighty dollar.
Gas/oil companies, have stakes and shares in auto manufacturers. Until Americans stand up and boycott on a mass scale and stop buying cares/trucks - and buying gas and oil - it wont change, You have to hit them where it hurts and to them thats the wallet.
Sorry but the fuel is electricity not water. HHO or "Browns" gas has been around for decades and works great for welding. as a fuel for cars it doesn't add up. All these HHO systems do is drain your battery and destroy your engine.
Hahahaha ... do you even think once in a while??? It is not H20, but H2 that you need. And for generating H2 out of H2O, you simply need more energy than you get out of it. That's how far you get with this rubbish idea! But enough Billy Bobs will be there who will say that it is oil companies that prevent this rubbish from being applied in mass production. Hahahah .. pathetic!
when is this going to happen...or shouldnt we be finding an even more efficient way like solar power, since people are already saying that clean water is low.. or can dirty salted oceanic water be used too?
OK this was posted 2 years ago and still nothing. I've heard about at least 4 different prototypes for super engines since then but NONE actually get to consumers.
first part maybe but patents are public knowledge. A requirement for filing a patent is explaining how to build one. Someone should just research the patents and see who's sitting on them
Unfortunately no. The guy who made this wants to be a greedy bastard and make money instead of doing the right thing and opening up this technology so BILLIONS of people can live a better life.
Get real. People are selfish by nature and piss on one another when given the chance. Don't believe me? Look at Doctors and how they rip off and then believe their ass should kissed in the process and they are supposed to help people. We are all in competition with each other and we all want to rule each other. He has the chance to become rich and he is taking it and why not.
It's not the GUY. It's the oil tycoons. Another man who did the same thing years b4 was murdered. I forget his name but the video is on youtube. Just search water car.
y isnt everyone using this?!?! if its as good as the video seems to demonstrate why not power all our things with water? also how much would it cost to own a machine like this? i really know nothing on this matter but this seems like a great start on clean fuels.
Yes yes, "HHO", or Oxyhydrogen or Brown's Gas. It doesn't have the chemical stability of water, like the video claims. It's very explosive. It does make a good fuel, but you know what makes a better fuel: the energy used to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen in the first place. PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINES DO NOT EXIST. (this has been the basis of multiple scams over the past century).
Yeah i think the video is slightly misleading, all hes doing is breaking down water to hyrogen, which uses energy, and burning the hyrogen, which then forms back to water, how exactly it works, i want to know.
do some of you doubters ever stop to think that since Hydrogen has alot of atomic properties that maybe this is an atomic reaction therefore the normal rules of having a balanced equation doesnt exist in atomic equations
The strength of the molecular covalent account the large amount of energy required to break it hence the large amount that is released when burnt hence reforming the bonds creating water... which is a very stable molecule---because of that strong bonding
No with some more creative inputs let me offer you the following. Since the auto industry simply wont re tool, we cant expect this idea to come out of detroit any time soon.
We must climb higher on the WW economic ladder to transportation of good, comercial trucking.
For all of the scientists out there nay saying the balanced equation and the idea that there are no free hamburgers, I think perhaps you might have absently missed the point. Starting from the basis of moving from a scarcity economy, an ancient sunlight petrochemical hydrocarbon based energy paradigm is the motive.
If I'm not mistaken this is simply electrolysis...and that more often than not requires energy....so basically they are spending energy to create energy....not to mention that DJNOR is right....no matter what you do it is impossible to bond an O with 2H, unless it is H2O, this whole thing is based off an unproven theory that HHO is some new type of gas. And it can't exist unless you can somehow force a H to accept more then 2 electrons...it just doesn't make chemical sense...
It's basic chemistry that a hydrogen atom can only bond to one other atom. That H in "HHO" would be bonded to two, and that 's just plain impossible. Sorry.
first off nothing is imposssible... what it probably is, is that it could be 2 separate peices... H and HO, very possible, and they are just writing it as HHO, which would be technically incorrect, but still correct. i think this would be the equation H + HO = H2O... properly balanced it would be (2)H + (2)HO = (2)H2O
Many things are impossble. Your knowledge of chemistry is absolutely miserable. I can't believe that you considered that first equation unbalanced. Neither H nor OH exists without the H being H+ and the OH being OH-, and their combination is simply acid/base neutralization. One way or another, you're going from water to water, and no matter what path you take, that's energy neutral.
i never said i was correct, im just putting my thoughts out there.... and it cant be energy neutral, becaus its creating heat... he is cutting through things, its also being used it his car engine... so the energy is there and being released
It absolutely MUST be energy neutral. Don't you remember figuring out the energy for one reaction by getting from the beginning to the end versus reactions you knew the energy of? Same beginning, same end, same energy, and if the beginning and the end is the same, no energy. I don't care what the man claims. it's chemically impossible, and I say that as research biochemist with a Ph.D. Good enough for you?
Water is not a fuel & never has been. Water never will be a fuel. Ask the Fire Brigade. Water can be converted back to its elements by electrolysis -- we all know that. The amount of energy required to electrolyze water is a lot greater than the amount released by burning the H2. Alternatively feed the H2 into a fuel cell and find that you only get about 50% of your energy back. All you gullible scientifically illiterate pillocks are just grasping at straws. Get an education for Christ's sake!
buddy are you blind? did you not just see the same video i did? i do have an education btw, im a mechanical engineer...i personally run my car on hho and the car has never run better in its life, its cleaner, more powerful, wayyy cheaper to run and maintain, and its got a lot less carbon emissions...
No, but you are. You're obviously another of those pillocks that believes this shite. WATER IS NOT A FUEL. Get that into your thick head. The "fuel" here is electricity, & an unstated amount, I might add. Hydrogen is a great fuel, but if you're going to use expensive electricity to generate it - forget it. We can turn cabbages into H2 (amongst other elements) if we want to, does that make cabbages a good fuel? Have you even considered where the electricity comes from? = Coal/oil/gas/nuclear.
no...it doesn't work like that(although it can), when you have it hooked up to your car , especially running 100%, the hydrogen and oxygen molecules have far more energy then and minor electricity drain caused, hydrogen is one of the most powerful types of fuels, and the cleanest, its 3 times more powerful then gasoline , and yet its much easier to manufacture as you go, its not breaking the rules its just bending them,
"hydrogen and oxygen molecules have far more energy then and minor electricity drain caused,"
Splitting H2O requires more energy than burning hydrogen in oxygen releases. Simple chemistry.
"hydrogen is one of the most powerful types of fuels"
No, it isn't. It is only powerful per weight, because it hardly weighs anything. Per volume, hydrogen stinks as a fuel. Gasoline easily beats hydrogen in energy released per volume.
if you knew anything about chemistry then you would know how to make/get hydrogen,once you have some go outside and fill a balloon half full of hydrogen,light it (take appropriate precautions),and listen to the bang, then fill a half balloon full again of fuel vapor and do the same, you tell me then which is more powerful.. and if you think that it still is then oh well we will just be too ignorant and drive cars running inefficiently on gasoline, im sure it'll be fine... screw trying...
its not "making" energy its simply unlocking it,electricity is used to split water into its crude elements,you my friend are just another one of those ignorant know it alls that refuses to believe something that works for so many people,including myself,and that you see working with your own eyes,i have tested this at my personal workshop on the dyno with my team of colleges,and they felt the same as you,until they saw it running,its not too late to convert your car mate, it will save you heaps!
Talking to you is a bit like discussing pulsed phased array radar systems with a caveman - a bit of a waste of time. There isn't room here for a critique of your comments, so we will just have to agree to disagree. But you may care to spend a year studying thermodynamics. I believe you are fooling yourself that you are gaining something for nothing here. Maybe when you get your electricity bill, you'll find out.
no ill tell you whats a waste of time, coming on this place, ive got a engineering degree in mechanics and combustion engines, and yet people still think that they are smarter in my own field for some crazy reason! and by the way part of that is spending a lot more than a year studying thermodynamics, and i dont use it on my house (yet) its running on my car, and i have massive savings on my petrol costs, along with more power it is running alot cleaner
and might i add talking to you is like explaining morals to George Bush, it would be easier to drive a glass nail through diamond, if you weren't so ignorant and blinded by your own ego and scared of using new techniques of efficiently using energy (which have worked for so many people ALREADY, then you might learn a thing or two from people that know what they are talking about and use this technology with great success, and save a few bucks...
"its not "making" energy its simply unlocking it,electricity is used to split water into its crude elements"
That is nonsense. You won't get any energy out of splitting water that you did not put into splitting the water.
"you see working with your own eyes"
I have seen many energy technologies "working" that later turned out to be nothing. Just a few years ago, one inventor drove a car running on penlight batteries.
whatever im not wasting my time explaining how it works for so many people, including myself, which has literally saved me thousands , to someone who is too ignorant and closed to new idea's that will only help you, its simply not worth it to help some fool on you tube...
HOLY CRAP!!! it does that to me too! i thought it was just my stupid computer, like i said to my friend the other day about this place, appreciate the long comments i make because they take forever to write....
good luck mate finding the info your after, sorry for the argument we had,honestly i hope this technology can be further developed because its already fantastic but not known very well, if you'd like i can give you a run down on how to install a home made kit on your car,it works for me
4cylaregay, please share that rundown. And, I have a small question to ask grounded in other people's doubting comments. Do you find yourself changing the battery more often?
sure just send me your email address through youtube and ill send it to anyone wanting it, and no ive been using the same battery , as a mechanic i would recommend you change it to a deep cycle though.... have a good one
4claregay... how the hell are you a mechanical engineer... you basically stated that the energy loss from the electrolysis is insignificant compared to the gain in the energy potential of gas.
Where did you get your degree from!? Was it one of those mail order ones you get over the internet??!
God I hope you aren't practicing! I strongly suggest a "well educated" person like yourself relearn Thermodynamics.
This is a perpetual motion machine. You can't get something from nothing!!!
from bloody working my gut's out most of my life and doing year's of study and PRAC! and yes that is "basically" what im saying....
and no i have done many hour's of study in the field of thermodynamics and it does not violate it, it is confused that that is what it's doing but it's not..
and no it is not a "perpetual motion machine" especially not this one (easier to use welder..).. it's simply USING A CLEANER FUEL SOURCE!!! why is that so hard for people to understand!
I understand and fully agree that burning hydrogen is clean.
I would appreciate you explaining (with your engineering expertise) how more energy can be obtained from the burning of the gas than what was used to break up the covalent molecular bonds of water.
Essentially I would like to know how you can get more energy from the gas then what you used to break up the initial water.
Would a scientific, technical response rather than "it is confused that that is what it's doing but it's not"
you know what if there wasn't so much sarcasm in your comment i would be more then happy to do that, i don't like using big word's or one's that sound complicated to make myself look intelligent, and since this IS you tube and not a patent office i prefer not to waste my time, in saying that please PM me through you tube and ill explain my reasoning/theory and give you plan's to try it for yourself...
same goes for everyone else, i cant stand typing in block's to fit the 500 character count..
This 4cylaregay guy is so full of shit. The efficiency of any water electrolysis setup is always going to be under 100%. You can't even break even. It's just a really inefficient storage battery.
yer im sure... as i have said so many friggin time's dont just trust anyone (or proffesional's in your case) make one yourself and see who is "full of shit" , just like i have been accused of only using word's as my claim's you have also used just word's so prove me wrong! i dont mean just looking up some more "words" on wiki etc but actually making/testing one yourself and proving me wrong!
i dont care anyway, save's me money that's all i care about..
I PM'd you and got no reply. One can only assume that you are still scrounging around for a shred scientific fact or theory to support these astounding claims
no im scrounging around through the 147 pm's i received in the last week trying to get the time to answer everyone's question's ,deal with pessimistic people like you and still have a normal life where i go to work etc instead of attacking people like me for trying to do there bit about climate change and saving fuel, i will get to your pm asap...
ive been away from home due to personal reason's and now i have well over 500 email's and probably 250-300 you tube pm's so im trying my best but it may take a little while...
but if the flame gets hotter than the sun on contact, cant they use it to produce nuclear fusion? cuz since the sun uses fusion as a source, then cant we use a larger version of this machine to produce electricity?
I think they don't know the fact that the system uses Batteries/current to separate H2O(Water) to Hydrogen and Oxygen using low voltage through electrolysis.
I think If people have a basic knowledge of electrolysis, they would understand the concept.
Car running on Battery,water and gasoline/diesel should be tagged as Hybrids for they use combination of fuel. It is a bit misleading to use water for we don't know much about the real potential of H2O.
Laws of thermodynamics aside, let the nay-sayers prove the fallacy here. Hydrogen power is for real. I have actually driven a 40 foot public transit bus powered by Hydrogen. Why not cars?
Very simple. The energy you consume is always larger than the energy you get from this system. Google "PMM" or "Laws of Thermodynamics". Educate yourself.
A car's alternator can put out 14 Volts @ 100 Amps. To make enough HHO gas to run a engine at 6000 RPM you would only need 12 Volts @ 10 Amps using Carbon Plate electrodes and you would still have to bleed off excess HHO gas pressure. Although this is better than using fossil fuels there are other technologies you don't know about. Electric engines have more torque than combustion engines. Using a Free Energy Coil with an electric engine is better in many ways.
yea the government and oil companies don't want there to be any other sources. they wanna keep pocketing millions of dollars while we suffer with high cost of fuel. bunch of corrupt bastards run the world and it'll never get better
You dumbasses! There is nothing new in it and nobody's trying to 'hide' this technology. It only an electrically expanded water! The water is certainly NOT a fuel. It acts like a medium for the energy that comes from electricity. It is true that the gas has %15 higher combustion efficiency than gasoline, but in order to use this technology to drive a car, you need an extremely huge and efficient gas generator! This is why they only use it for welding applications.
This can't be allowed to exist. My oil stocks will take a dive, I can not allow that! Everyone ignore this. It's on Fox news anyhow, as if anyone would believe they report the news.
He was lucky that the news got to him before the government. and now it's on youtube! people have come up with this before and disappeared. it would ruin the fossil fuel industry because it's too good to be true!
How does that warm to the touch and hot as the sun thing work? that is amazing!
That is due to diatomic hydrogen (H2) being split into mono-atomic Hydrogen (just plain "H"). When the single "H" atoms get near each other, they re-unite, giving off a LOT of heat in the process. This happens when the "H" atoms hit the surface to be welded: over 3400-degrees Fahrenheit.
This used to be called an "Atomic Hydrogen Welder" back during the '30s and early '40s, until after WWII, when the "Powers That Be" decided that all the newly technically-trained servicemen returning home from the war had best not have access to this, lest they get ideas. And so, it was "erased". Get some older textbooks, and look up "Langmuir". He was a Nobel Prize winning Physicist, so he will not be hard to find; at least, not in pre-1945 textbooks!
The U.S goverment would never let something like this to really hit the market. why?! Because the goverment would lose too much money in taxes. Probluy will get bought out for alot of money or shoot dead, or die in a werid "actident" know what i mean.
I just looked at the website in the description... you look at the "scientific details" page, its all a bunch of gibberish that is supposed to sound revolutionary but in reality is meaningless, physically impossible, or plain silly. "widely varying energy content"? "doesnt follow the fundamental PVT law for gases"???? Come ON. And NOWHERE does it mention how the generator is supposed to work, or what "HHO" is supposed to mean.
It always appalls me when the news people let stories like this through and dont check their BASIC BASIC science. They were duped. The whole H2O/HHO thing is nonsense, theres no physical significance to the term HHO. You can use electrolysis to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gas, but the process requires electricity and you get THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF ENERGY OUT BY BURNING THE HYDROGEN AS YOU PUT INTO SPLITTING THE WATER MOLECULES. People need to study their thermodynamics.
Wouldn't it be cool if our own urine could be used as fuel source? Like using uric and nitric acid along with carbon dioxide that our body emits to make a fuel source. We would be through a tube and fuel our cars! Awesome!
In 1876, a young girl named Jenn was walking down a river, an insane man killed her by stabbing her in the back, raping her, and then hanging her in his closet. While he hanged her he said Bukakke Bukkake.
Now that you have read this message, she will find you and her dead body will haunt your house for 5 years. Every night you go to sleep she will appear in your closet, hanging their with her glowing red eyes.
You know this might well cause war, especailly now millions of people across the world know about this or are getting the informaation about this, sooner or later the oil comanies may start to feel peoples wrath about their pollution and the way they cover up other technologies to compete with them plus the wars they cause to get other peoples oil.
WHY THE FUCK DOES THE MILITARY GET IT! thats not fair, its always the fucking assholes that fuck up the world get it. WE THE PEOPLE make up this country WE should get it first!
Look, good tech will push itself for VERY economic, social, and logical reasons. The power of inovation will not stand still for some ancient fossil fuel to run out. REDICULOUS! I laugh at that thought...
IF ever they prevented one man from inventing it, 10 others would come up with it. And eventualy, the tide of invention overcomes ignorance and supression.
p.s. Abondon the middle east, divy it up? Just as rediculous.
"good ties w/ middle eastern countries"... destroying Iraq to lay down oil lines would not fall into good ties, through out history the fight for resources has been a bitch. "it has to WAIT"? Hahahaha, why would a cheaper more readily available recourse wait, Is the US government gonna stop it? sure as hell economy wont...
What they don't mention is that it takes an equal amount of energy to convert the water to hydrogen and oxygen as the amount of energy the flame releases... So you're not really saving anything by doing it.
Cars powered by water/steam have been possible since cars were invented...They could go up to 120 mph. Ford cars were just cheaper than the ones that ran on steam, so they stopped making them. This is old news. Like, a hundred years' old news.
ya u dont even know what your talking bout retard. Steam power is just heating up water turning it to steam which builds up pressure and turns a turbine to power something like a wheel this guy is doing something insanly diffrent
spelling isnt a sign of intellegence and if your wondering i failed every damn spelling test i was given but atleast i know the concepts of using steam pressure and converting steam to gas which probly involves a process called electrollosis im not sure im not even sure how to spell it
This has been flagged as spam show
I think everyone interested in this subject should have a look at this review in ebay website:
reviews.ebay.com/Hydrogen-Generator-Economy-Device-SCAMS_W0QQugidZ10000000005261775
MywkSakanai 1 year ago
Also, major LOLs at "hotter than the surface of the sun". The corona surronding the sun is 3,000,000 °F. This genius is using a blowtorch to burn through a piece of charcoal?? Charcoal is designed to burn, duh. 3,000,000 °F would instantly vaporise it.
spentfromnz 1 year ago 2
@spentfromnz law of conservation of energy. the people don't know or cannot understand this very simple fact. there are many energy sources around and we can convert this energy to usefull for us but is impossible by the laws of nature to "create" energy, as many people think.
omerta410 1 year ago
@spentfromnz The corona is 3,000,000. The surface is 6,000. Don't ask me, I don't know how that is.
notessimodude 4 months ago
All you conspiracy theorists need to stfu on subjects you don't fully comprehend. The reason this technology has not taken off and never will is because it takes more energy to split the water into a gas than is actually produced by burning the gas. This may be a hard concept for some of you retards to fathom, but water doesn't just simply burn on it's own, it need to be electrolysed to separate the hydrogen and oxygen atoms, which takes a lot of energy to do.
spentfromnz 1 year ago
Did anyone catch the sleight of hand comment there at the very end by the woman reporter? This is why this technology isn't widespread because the bilderberg's and bankers et al haven't yet figured out a way to make money off of it. They want to milk the oil for every last cent before they start charging the slaves and sheep for water and solar power. We're all fucked unless we all become independent of them. Figure this shit out yourself and when you do help your neighbors until it's widespread
answertotodayis1776 1 year ago 2
FUCK THE AMERICAN GOVERNAMENT ......THIS MOTHER FUCKERS DESTROY OUR PLANET AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ......
nesher1000 1 year ago 2
The problem here is quite simple. Conservation of energy. Unless something truly incredible and inexplicable is happening it will take more energy, in the form of electricity, to create the gas than will be released when it is burned.
That's the sad truth of reality :(. No government conspiracy. No big oil bust jobs. Just math.
rocketman55100 1 year ago
what's the difference between HHO and H2O? H2O = 2 H and 1O...
LittleLlion 1 year ago
they just forget to mention that making hydrogen out of water requires a great amount of energy.... it is exactly the same energy that is released during combustion... this is why we are not filling our tanks from the TAP. OK... they say it enhances combustion efficiency... who knows...anyways i´ve never seen mileage data posted on the net.
tascheri 2 years ago
@tascheri nope, not the same energy output... it's less, in fact. Anyway thanksfor being the voice of reason here.
srm13560 1 year ago
if you put the technology into cars, you still need electricity AND water. car manufacturers are just cutting out the water part because its pointless
xNightwraith 2 years ago
Too much money to loose from not using fossil fuels. they rather destroy the earth than lose money
straq2 2 years ago 4
i remember seeing this a year or two ago... what ever happed to this guys stuff?
WHY AINT I FILLING UP THE TANK WITH TAP!?!
PhilipWitte 2 years ago
regarding the gas there is only one alternative that is 100% safe and will help america the secret is WALKING!!!!
oceanairguitarforce 2 years ago
@oceanairguitarforce This method is not 100% safe. I tried it and got run over by a push bike ;)
dannysplace7 2 years ago
And as the anchor in the end says "We just have to hope that water prices don't build up like the gas". It may happen 0_o
dimiTTar 2 years ago
@dimiTTar I'd love to see government tax on water, with people filling their cars with rain water, selling black market bottles of Evian and breaking into resevoirs.. yes!
artwel123 1 year ago
@artwel123 Lmao
Aint no Evian goin into my cadillac .. mine only take FIJI
kidsundays 1 year ago
Some form of cold fusion?
Lowonfuel 2 years ago
Flame moves & sounds like an electric spark, so is this for real or just another scam?.
Lowonfuel 2 years ago
Meant to post these comments on the "Salt Water Fuel" video
Lowonfuel 2 years ago
Can anyone say if the water used should be salt water or fresh water? Or both? In case of fresh water this kind of technology won't become very popular...
dimiTTar 2 years ago
I assume it's fresh water but using desalination technology salt water can be used. You can even extract water from the air so I cant see why his invention shouldn't go mainstream soon.
myY0UTUBEchanneI 2 years ago
I see your point but still...
97% of all water in this planet is salt water, 3% is freshwater. Desalination can be used but it's not cheap to do. If it were, we wouldn't have 18% of Earth's population suffering from lack of safe drinking water. From that 3% which is fresh water, 2/3rds is in ice form in Antarctica and Arctic and the rest is underground. Only 0.03% is the water you can actually see in lakes, rivers and ponds
Freshwater is becoming the new oil. Soon out of oil, soon out of water
dimiTTar 2 years ago
There's a video on the side called "Salt water Fuel". Maybe it can be done. we wont know until the oil runs out, if you know what I mean.
/watch?v=Tf4gOS8aoFk
myY0UTUBEchanneI 2 years ago
why is this shit not being developed on a large scale fuck i hate the goverment fucks.
HansiKursch666 3 years ago 13
for the simple reason: this is complete rubbish and nothing else. What have the governments to do with it, anyhow. If there is technology that really creates the utility "inventors" claim, then there is no way to stop it. But this is just not the case here. Here, it is just a scam and nothing else. This Billy Bob should go to the circus, ahahahahahaha.
shanghaikidx 2 years ago
@HansiKursch666 its not the government, its major corp.s like OIL, CAR, and ENERGY industries as a whole. They knock out new tech because it compromises their service base. I have no way to prove it but if you took a good look I'm sure you'd find a prominent pattern.
delta2131 1 year ago
@HansiKursch666
Agreed!!
The Gov likes to steal our money and screw us!
Screw the elitests!!
Probound88 1 year ago 7
@HansiKursch666. It's not the GOV. It are the gas, oil, and automakers that are doing it. The automakers have, and have had the ability to create cars and trucks which get 35+ mpg for years now - but they won't because of the almighty dollar.
Gas/oil companies, have stakes and shares in auto manufacturers. Until Americans stand up and boycott on a mass scale and stop buying cares/trucks - and buying gas and oil - it wont change, You have to hit them where it hurts and to them thats the wallet.
tpaadministrator 1 year ago
Sorry but the fuel is electricity not water. HHO or "Browns" gas has been around for decades and works great for welding. as a fuel for cars it doesn't add up. All these HHO systems do is drain your battery and destroy your engine.
Librarian62 3 years ago
Solar? We have plenty of water on this planet.
Water falls from the sky my friend...think about.
This technology needs to be made available to everyone...and it is. NOW!
btsumm 3 years ago
Hahahaha ... do you even think once in a while??? It is not H20, but H2 that you need. And for generating H2 out of H2O, you simply need more energy than you get out of it. That's how far you get with this rubbish idea! But enough Billy Bobs will be there who will say that it is oil companies that prevent this rubbish from being applied in mass production. Hahahah .. pathetic!
shanghaikidx 2 years ago
when is this going to happen...or shouldnt we be finding an even more efficient way like solar power, since people are already saying that clean water is low.. or can dirty salted oceanic water be used too?
yodafool8 3 years ago
I think I found the cheapest way to modify any car on the website on my profile
robertcornwall123 3 years ago
the big oil companies will fight against this coming out because its the law for them to make money for their stockholders they want us to be slaves
prince2rule 3 years ago
TheRunYourCarOnWater. com
Is the #1 rated site on learning how to convert your car to run on water!
ness3084 3 years ago
Excelente iniciativa. El diesel tiene los dias contados...
estadistico 3 years ago
First came "SNAKE OIL." Now we have "SNAKE GAS." Stinky! Stinky! Yuck!
JFSFLICKS 3 years ago
Please don't set the oceans on fire. Can you imagine the global warming we would have to deal with then? ---- LOL.
JFSFLICKS 3 years ago
Manual on how to run your car with water on my profile. I got many customers, and no negative feedback.
RUNyourCARwithWATER 3 years ago
OK this was posted 2 years ago and still nothing. I've heard about at least 4 different prototypes for super engines since then but NONE actually get to consumers.
WTF?
juanthestabber 3 years ago
as far as I know the gas companies bought this patent you see in the video back in the 80's and just buried it so they can go on selling oil.
Giltas1337 3 years ago
first part maybe but patents are public knowledge. A requirement for filing a patent is explaining how to build one. Someone should just research the patents and see who's sitting on them
juanthestabber 3 years ago
The Japanese have made something similar. What is the hold up on this? Our government holding this back???
y2knoproblem 3 years ago
Unfortunately no. The guy who made this wants to be a greedy bastard and make money instead of doing the right thing and opening up this technology so BILLIONS of people can live a better life.
AngryRam1 3 years ago
Get real. People are selfish by nature and piss on one another when given the chance. Don't believe me? Look at Doctors and how they rip off and then believe their ass should kissed in the process and they are supposed to help people. We are all in competition with each other and we all want to rule each other. He has the chance to become rich and he is taking it and why not.
DMalenfant1 3 years ago
It's not the GUY. It's the oil tycoons. Another man who did the same thing years b4 was murdered. I forget his name but the video is on youtube. Just search water car.
g35suck 3 years ago
y isnt everyone using this?!?! if its as good as the video seems to demonstrate why not power all our things with water? also how much would it cost to own a machine like this? i really know nothing on this matter but this seems like a great start on clean fuels.
marianoh44 3 years ago
Yes yes, "HHO", or Oxyhydrogen or Brown's Gas. It doesn't have the chemical stability of water, like the video claims. It's very explosive. It does make a good fuel, but you know what makes a better fuel: the energy used to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen in the first place. PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINES DO NOT EXIST. (this has been the basis of multiple scams over the past century).
allengarvin 3 years ago
hey asshole you stoll my idea
you communist!!!!
ankiedo 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For more information on this please type the following:
squidoo. com /runacaronwaterfuel
just erase the spaces in between the words
nataliyanataliya333 3 years ago
Yeah i think the video is slightly misleading, all hes doing is breaking down water to hyrogen, which uses energy, and burning the hyrogen, which then forms back to water, how exactly it works, i want to know.
eltrain2 3 years ago
its not running on water lol its hydrogen
contentlocked99 3 years ago
do some of you doubters ever stop to think that since Hydrogen has alot of atomic properties that maybe this is an atomic reaction therefore the normal rules of having a balanced equation doesnt exist in atomic equations
LedHead23 3 years ago
It's a reaction at the molecular level.
The strength of the molecular covalent account the large amount of energy required to break it hence the large amount that is released when burnt hence reforming the bonds creating water... which is a very stable molecule---because of that strong bonding
thebun88 3 years ago 2
No with some more creative inputs let me offer you the following. Since the auto industry simply wont re tool, we cant expect this idea to come out of detroit any time soon.
We must climb higher on the WW economic ladder to transportation of good, comercial trucking.
catmancometh1212 3 years ago
For all of the scientists out there nay saying the balanced equation and the idea that there are no free hamburgers, I think perhaps you might have absently missed the point. Starting from the basis of moving from a scarcity economy, an ancient sunlight petrochemical hydrocarbon based energy paradigm is the motive.
catmancometh1212 3 years ago
This seems complete bullshit to me.
eltrain2 3 years ago
If I'm not mistaken this is simply electrolysis...and that more often than not requires energy....so basically they are spending energy to create energy....not to mention that DJNOR is right....no matter what you do it is impossible to bond an O with 2H, unless it is H2O, this whole thing is based off an unproven theory that HHO is some new type of gas. And it can't exist unless you can somehow force a H to accept more then 2 electrons...it just doesn't make chemical sense...
WizardAverdon 3 years ago
It's basic chemistry that a hydrogen atom can only bond to one other atom. That H in "HHO" would be bonded to two, and that 's just plain impossible. Sorry.
DJCNOR 3 years ago
first off nothing is imposssible... what it probably is, is that it could be 2 separate peices... H and HO, very possible, and they are just writing it as HHO, which would be technically incorrect, but still correct. i think this would be the equation H + HO = H2O... properly balanced it would be (2)H + (2)HO = (2)H2O
12kevmo17 3 years ago
Many things are impossble. Your knowledge of chemistry is absolutely miserable. I can't believe that you considered that first equation unbalanced. Neither H nor OH exists without the H being H+ and the OH being OH-, and their combination is simply acid/base neutralization. One way or another, you're going from water to water, and no matter what path you take, that's energy neutral.
DJCNOR 3 years ago
i never said i was correct, im just putting my thoughts out there.... and it cant be energy neutral, becaus its creating heat... he is cutting through things, its also being used it his car engine... so the energy is there and being released
12kevmo17 3 years ago
It absolutely MUST be energy neutral. Don't you remember figuring out the energy for one reaction by getting from the beginning to the end versus reactions you knew the energy of? Same beginning, same end, same energy, and if the beginning and the end is the same, no energy. I don't care what the man claims. it's chemically impossible, and I say that as research biochemist with a Ph.D. Good enough for you?
DJCNOR 3 years ago
If by any chance that water does replace fossil fuels and harmful gases as our main source of energy, Will the prices of water go up? lol
RaynardAlcampor 3 years ago
For more information on this, please type in your google browser the following: "runacaronwaterfuel"
nataliyanataliya333 3 years ago
HaXzz!
ragalfragle 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Collect the free money now. Hi guys- register now with the Referral Code JUSTMORE to grab the 600 Dollar free Bonus at Fulltiltpoker com!
lastminute07 3 years ago
instead of using current to split the water try high voltage capacitors thru water.
1965panther1965 4 years ago
Water is not a fuel & never has been. Water never will be a fuel. Ask the Fire Brigade. Water can be converted back to its elements by electrolysis -- we all know that. The amount of energy required to electrolyze water is a lot greater than the amount released by burning the H2. Alternatively feed the H2 into a fuel cell and find that you only get about 50% of your energy back. All you gullible scientifically illiterate pillocks are just grasping at straws. Get an education for Christ's sake!
Gruntol5 4 years ago
buddy are you blind? did you not just see the same video i did? i do have an education btw, im a mechanical engineer...i personally run my car on hho and the car has never run better in its life, its cleaner, more powerful, wayyy cheaper to run and maintain, and its got a lot less carbon emissions...
4cylaregay 4 years ago
No, but you are. You're obviously another of those pillocks that believes this shite. WATER IS NOT A FUEL. Get that into your thick head. The "fuel" here is electricity, & an unstated amount, I might add. Hydrogen is a great fuel, but if you're going to use expensive electricity to generate it - forget it. We can turn cabbages into H2 (amongst other elements) if we want to, does that make cabbages a good fuel? Have you even considered where the electricity comes from? = Coal/oil/gas/nuclear.
Gruntol5 4 years ago
no...it doesn't work like that(although it can), when you have it hooked up to your car , especially running 100%, the hydrogen and oxygen molecules have far more energy then and minor electricity drain caused, hydrogen is one of the most powerful types of fuels, and the cleanest, its 3 times more powerful then gasoline , and yet its much easier to manufacture as you go, its not breaking the rules its just bending them,
4cylaregay 4 years ago
"hydrogen and oxygen molecules have far more energy then and minor electricity drain caused,"
Splitting H2O requires more energy than burning hydrogen in oxygen releases. Simple chemistry.
"hydrogen is one of the most powerful types of fuels"
No, it isn't. It is only powerful per weight, because it hardly weighs anything. Per volume, hydrogen stinks as a fuel. Gasoline easily beats hydrogen in energy released per volume.
Pooua 4 years ago
if you knew anything about chemistry then you would know how to make/get hydrogen,once you have some go outside and fill a balloon half full of hydrogen,light it (take appropriate precautions),and listen to the bang, then fill a half balloon full again of fuel vapor and do the same, you tell me then which is more powerful.. and if you think that it still is then oh well we will just be too ignorant and drive cars running inefficiently on gasoline, im sure it'll be fine... screw trying...
4cylaregay 4 years ago
its not "making" energy its simply unlocking it,electricity is used to split water into its crude elements,you my friend are just another one of those ignorant know it alls that refuses to believe something that works for so many people,including myself,and that you see working with your own eyes,i have tested this at my personal workshop on the dyno with my team of colleges,and they felt the same as you,until they saw it running,its not too late to convert your car mate, it will save you heaps!
4cylaregay 4 years ago
Talking to you is a bit like discussing pulsed phased array radar systems with a caveman - a bit of a waste of time. There isn't room here for a critique of your comments, so we will just have to agree to disagree. But you may care to spend a year studying thermodynamics. I believe you are fooling yourself that you are gaining something for nothing here. Maybe when you get your electricity bill, you'll find out.
Gruntol5 4 years ago
no ill tell you whats a waste of time, coming on this place, ive got a engineering degree in mechanics and combustion engines, and yet people still think that they are smarter in my own field for some crazy reason! and by the way part of that is spending a lot more than a year studying thermodynamics, and i dont use it on my house (yet) its running on my car, and i have massive savings on my petrol costs, along with more power it is running alot cleaner
4cylaregay 4 years ago
and might i add talking to you is like explaining morals to George Bush, it would be easier to drive a glass nail through diamond, if you weren't so ignorant and blinded by your own ego and scared of using new techniques of efficiently using energy (which have worked for so many people ALREADY, then you might learn a thing or two from people that know what they are talking about and use this technology with great success, and save a few bucks...
4cylaregay 4 years ago
"its not "making" energy its simply unlocking it,electricity is used to split water into its crude elements"
That is nonsense. You won't get any energy out of splitting water that you did not put into splitting the water.
"you see working with your own eyes"
I have seen many energy technologies "working" that later turned out to be nothing. Just a few years ago, one inventor drove a car running on penlight batteries.
Pooua 4 years ago
whatever im not wasting my time explaining how it works for so many people, including myself, which has literally saved me thousands , to someone who is too ignorant and closed to new idea's that will only help you, its simply not worth it to help some fool on you tube...
4cylaregay 4 years ago
Fine, don't explain it. Just tell me the patent #, since it is patented.
Pooua 4 years ago
wait are you being smart? or have you woken up from your oil company lulled sleep..
4cylaregay 4 years ago
I like patents. I always wanted to be an inventor. So, when you say your device is patented, I want to see the patent.
Pooua 4 years ago
sorry mate its not my invention, try googleing it, btw this is cool, its the first time someone has replied so quickly on here...
4cylaregay 4 years ago
"btw this is cool, its the first time someone has replied so quickly on here..."
Yeah, no thanks to YouTube. It let's me post twice, then forces me to wait several minutes. Now it is slowing my keystroke echo.
Anyway, this isn't the first time I've heard of Brown's Gas. Wikipedia also has an article on Oxyhydrogen. Check Wiki's discussion.
Pooua 4 years ago
Stanley Meyer also is also in Wikipedia & on YouTube. Wiki currently redirects to "Water fuel cell."
Pooua 4 years ago
HOLY CRAP!!! it does that to me too! i thought it was just my stupid computer, like i said to my friend the other day about this place, appreciate the long comments i make because they take forever to write....
good luck mate finding the info your after, sorry for the argument we had,honestly i hope this technology can be further developed because its already fantastic but not known very well, if you'd like i can give you a run down on how to install a home made kit on your car,it works for me
4cylaregay 4 years ago
4cylaregay, please share that rundown. And, I have a small question to ask grounded in other people's doubting comments. Do you find yourself changing the battery more often?
Thanks.
urbanmari 3 years ago
sure just send me your email address through youtube and ill send it to anyone wanting it, and no ive been using the same battery , as a mechanic i would recommend you change it to a deep cycle though.... have a good one
4cylaregay 3 years ago
4claregay... how the hell are you a mechanical engineer... you basically stated that the energy loss from the electrolysis is insignificant compared to the gain in the energy potential of gas.
Where did you get your degree from!? Was it one of those mail order ones you get over the internet??!
God I hope you aren't practicing! I strongly suggest a "well educated" person like yourself relearn Thermodynamics.
This is a perpetual motion machine. You can't get something from nothing!!!
thebun88 3 years ago
from bloody working my gut's out most of my life and doing year's of study and PRAC! and yes that is "basically" what im saying....
and no i have done many hour's of study in the field of thermodynamics and it does not violate it, it is confused that that is what it's doing but it's not..
and no it is not a "perpetual motion machine" especially not this one (easier to use welder..).. it's simply USING A CLEANER FUEL SOURCE!!! why is that so hard for people to understand!
4cylaregay 3 years ago
I understand and fully agree that burning hydrogen is clean.
I would appreciate you explaining (with your engineering expertise) how more energy can be obtained from the burning of the gas than what was used to break up the covalent molecular bonds of water.
Essentially I would like to know how you can get more energy from the gas then what you used to break up the initial water.
Would a scientific, technical response rather than "it is confused that that is what it's doing but it's not"
thebun88 3 years ago
you know what if there wasn't so much sarcasm in your comment i would be more then happy to do that, i don't like using big word's or one's that sound complicated to make myself look intelligent, and since this IS you tube and not a patent office i prefer not to waste my time, in saying that please PM me through you tube and ill explain my reasoning/theory and give you plan's to try it for yourself...
same goes for everyone else, i cant stand typing in block's to fit the 500 character count..
4cylaregay 3 years ago
This 4cylaregay guy is so full of shit. The efficiency of any water electrolysis setup is always going to be under 100%. You can't even break even. It's just a really inefficient storage battery.
jakeharvey 3 years ago
yer im sure... as i have said so many friggin time's dont just trust anyone (or proffesional's in your case) make one yourself and see who is "full of shit" , just like i have been accused of only using word's as my claim's you have also used just word's so prove me wrong! i dont mean just looking up some more "words" on wiki etc but actually making/testing one yourself and proving me wrong!
i dont care anyway, save's me money that's all i care about..
4cylaregay 3 years ago
Hi, could you please send me info on how to do this.Thanks,
firemanjp 3 years ago
I PM'd you and got no reply. One can only assume that you are still scrounging around for a shred scientific fact or theory to support these astounding claims
thebun88 3 years ago
no im scrounging around through the 147 pm's i received in the last week trying to get the time to answer everyone's question's ,deal with pessimistic people like you and still have a normal life where i go to work etc instead of attacking people like me for trying to do there bit about climate change and saving fuel, i will get to your pm asap...
4cylaregay 3 years ago
Thanks for helping save the planet. You guys ROCK!
sgregg5257 3 years ago
ive been away from home due to personal reason's and now i have well over 500 email's and probably 250-300 you tube pm's so im trying my best but it may take a little while...
4cylaregay 3 years ago
Guess where the electricity to break the covalent bonds between the hydrogen and oxygen in the water comes from?
Coal and gas fired power plants.
Golgo13ThePro 3 years ago
but if the flame gets hotter than the sun on contact, cant they use it to produce nuclear fusion? cuz since the sun uses fusion as a source, then cant we use a larger version of this machine to produce electricity?
airsoftboi909 3 years ago
I think they don't know the fact that the system uses Batteries/current to separate H2O(Water) to Hydrogen and Oxygen using low voltage through electrolysis.
I think If people have a basic knowledge of electrolysis, they would understand the concept.
Car running on Battery,water and gasoline/diesel should be tagged as Hybrids for they use combination of fuel. It is a bit misleading to use water for we don't know much about the real potential of H2O.
josacra 3 years ago
Laws of thermodynamics aside, let the nay-sayers prove the fallacy here. Hydrogen power is for real. I have actually driven a 40 foot public transit bus powered by Hydrogen. Why not cars?
mikesandburg 4 years ago
because people want it to be wrong, its too much change for the good to quickly and most peoples fragile little minds simply cannot handle that
4cylaregay 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Any one with some basic knowledge in thermodynamics knows this is just plain stupid. Fox news? lmao
hankliu2006 4 years ago
Explain yourself!
urmomsuckedit 4 years ago
Very simple. The energy you consume is always larger than the energy you get from this system. Google "PMM" or "Laws of Thermodynamics". Educate yourself.
hankliu2006 4 years ago
Educate myself? I'm a mechanical engineer! Which law of Thermodynamics are you refering to?
urmomsuckedit 4 years ago
its no use mate, im also a mechanical engineer, but some ignorant people still wont listen...
4cylaregay 4 years ago
A car's alternator can put out 14 Volts @ 100 Amps. To make enough HHO gas to run a engine at 6000 RPM you would only need 12 Volts @ 10 Amps using Carbon Plate electrodes and you would still have to bleed off excess HHO gas pressure. Although this is better than using fossil fuels there are other technologies you don't know about. Electric engines have more torque than combustion engines. Using a Free Energy Coil with an electric engine is better in many ways.
CrazeReign 4 years ago
what the fOck is this?
vompl 4 years ago
I can not believe some news channel reported this as true material.
theanphibian 4 years ago
Surprised that water can burn? Firstly found out in 2007?
Error! Known before!
The Holy Quran tells us about the "burning sea" in the 52nd Sura. Read it on arabic or an exact translation!
All the best!
Arabalman 4 years ago
HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.
yourjefe 4 years ago
Anyone who thinks this will solve our problems is an idiot.
The car needs electricity to run anyway. Far more efficient to run the car off an electric motor than to do some type of electrolysis.
t3hgreeklegend 4 years ago
This is a few years old. So why hasn't it taken over?
You know that reason, don't you?
theonlyrealMugsy 4 years ago 3
yea the government and oil companies don't want there to be any other sources. they wanna keep pocketing millions of dollars while we suffer with high cost of fuel. bunch of corrupt bastards run the world and it'll never get better
kodiak450r 4 years ago 4
my escort usualy runs on air "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
ewantodd 4 years ago
on ebay theres one up for auction item number
160157977713
theoneagain 4 years ago
what are we waiting for
battlestar37 4 years ago
You dumbasses! There is nothing new in it and nobody's trying to 'hide' this technology. It only an electrically expanded water! The water is certainly NOT a fuel. It acts like a medium for the energy that comes from electricity. It is true that the gas has %15 higher combustion efficiency than gasoline, but in order to use this technology to drive a car, you need an extremely huge and efficient gas generator! This is why they only use it for welding applications.
mymdb 4 years ago
You are wrong my friend,
methinks you don't know what you are talking about.
deepsnow78 4 years ago
the beginning of fusion power
Kman922002 4 years ago
Bush and his phony's wont let this happen... how else will they controll the world !
rollinlowford 4 years ago
THE WORLD NEEDS THIS TECHNOLOGY!!!
sidesteal 4 years ago 2
This can't be allowed to exist. My oil stocks will take a dive, I can not allow that! Everyone ignore this. It's on Fox news anyhow, as if anyone would believe they report the news.
sean2me 4 years ago
You can do this yourself for FREE. Water fuel cell org and other places show you how
cfootball10 4 years ago
"they" will never let this get very far
jdoubleu06 4 years ago
this invention can save our world if this is not a hoax
let's hope it won't disappear mysteriously
FlamerK6 4 years ago
DR William Rhodes...that is
cfootball10 4 years ago
Dr William Brown, an atomic physicist did this first and better. The atomic mass of this gas is different HHO (Klien has to add to his water)
cfootball10 4 years ago
He was lucky that the news got to him before the government. and now it's on youtube! people have come up with this before and disappeared. it would ruin the fossil fuel industry because it's too good to be true!
How does that warm to the touch and hot as the sun thing work? that is amazing!
henspens 4 years ago
That is due to diatomic hydrogen (H2) being split into mono-atomic Hydrogen (just plain "H"). When the single "H" atoms get near each other, they re-unite, giving off a LOT of heat in the process. This happens when the "H" atoms hit the surface to be welded: over 3400-degrees Fahrenheit.
rforslund 4 years ago
This used to be called an "Atomic Hydrogen Welder" back during the '30s and early '40s, until after WWII, when the "Powers That Be" decided that all the newly technically-trained servicemen returning home from the war had best not have access to this, lest they get ideas. And so, it was "erased". Get some older textbooks, and look up "Langmuir". He was a Nobel Prize winning Physicist, so he will not be hard to find; at least, not in pre-1945 textbooks!
rforslund 4 years ago
The U.S goverment would never let something like this to really hit the market. why?! Because the goverment would lose too much money in taxes. Probluy will get bought out for alot of money or shoot dead, or die in a werid "actident" know what i mean.
ProphetRay 4 years ago
I just looked at the website in the description... you look at the "scientific details" page, its all a bunch of gibberish that is supposed to sound revolutionary but in reality is meaningless, physically impossible, or plain silly. "widely varying energy content"? "doesnt follow the fundamental PVT law for gases"???? Come ON. And NOWHERE does it mention how the generator is supposed to work, or what "HHO" is supposed to mean.
torgamus2 4 years ago
It always appalls me when the news people let stories like this through and dont check their BASIC BASIC science. They were duped. The whole H2O/HHO thing is nonsense, theres no physical significance to the term HHO. You can use electrolysis to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gas, but the process requires electricity and you get THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF ENERGY OUT BY BURNING THE HYDROGEN AS YOU PUT INTO SPLITTING THE WATER MOLECULES. People need to study their thermodynamics.
torgamus2 4 years ago
Wouldn't it be cool if our own urine could be used as fuel source? Like using uric and nitric acid along with carbon dioxide that our body emits to make a fuel source. We would be through a tube and fuel our cars! Awesome!
MissNmaN 4 years ago
i try this at a lab it can be done but hard to do
davidwhitt46 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 1876, a young girl named Jenn was walking down a river, an insane man killed her by stabbing her in the back, raping her, and then hanging her in his closet. While he hanged her he said Bukakke Bukkake.
Now that you have read this message, she will find you and her dead body will haunt your house for 5 years. Every night you go to sleep she will appear in your closet, hanging their with her glowing red eyes.
repost 3 times to be saved
Ricke940 4 years ago
you know... just stfu
kodoro 4 years ago
Any chance this newscast was first aired on April 1st?
cornishjazz 4 years ago
You know this might well cause war, especailly now millions of people across the world know about this or are getting the informaation about this, sooner or later the oil comanies may start to feel peoples wrath about their pollution and the way they cover up other technologies to compete with them plus the wars they cause to get other peoples oil.
DerVampyrEngel 4 years ago
After he builds those Hummers, he'll be whacked for sure.
prinparis 5 years ago
WHY THE FUCK DOES THE MILITARY GET IT! thats not fair, its always the fucking assholes that fuck up the world get it. WE THE PEOPLE make up this country WE should get it first!
yelton1488 5 years ago
Do you understand that we're currently fighting enemies that'll utilize any resource available to the general public?
Heck, even if our enemies were the formal military of a particular country, the paradigm doesn't change.
Technology like this has a good chance of making it into the private sector in the future. But we'll probably need to push for it.
Thundercross 4 years ago
This dude is probably not gonna live too long.
mi777ke777 5 years ago
Look, good tech will push itself for VERY economic, social, and logical reasons. The power of inovation will not stand still for some ancient fossil fuel to run out. REDICULOUS! I laugh at that thought...
IF ever they prevented one man from inventing it, 10 others would come up with it. And eventualy, the tide of invention overcomes ignorance and supression.
p.s. Abondon the middle east, divy it up? Just as rediculous.
YangPile 5 years ago
thats so cool i want to do that
msenosk 5 years ago
water fuels are TRUE, its just we can't let it go farther than this...
Oil is the only reason why countries around the world keep good ties w/ middle eastern countries.
Water fuel is already PROVEN true and effective, but it has to WAIT until the world depletes itself of fossil fuels.
bnkrmike24 5 years ago
you are so full of shit
oil is bad for the environment, and the world, and should be abondoned now, while we still have a chance.
as for the middle east, let it tear itself apart, or take it over and divvy it up so it can't
Aeronutsdarkangel13 5 years ago
and you call that an intelligent reply to a decent comment? clearly you're pathetic pea brain can't handle facts
if i want any crap out of you i'll just squeeze your head
bnkrmike24 5 years ago
"good ties w/ middle eastern countries"... destroying Iraq to lay down oil lines would not fall into good ties, through out history the fight for resources has been a bitch. "it has to WAIT"? Hahahaha, why would a cheaper more readily available recourse wait, Is the US government gonna stop it? sure as hell economy wont...
spuffles 5 years ago
one word, amazing
maskedbob 5 years ago
its called "brown's gas" and its OFN.
priceooo 5 years ago
How much electricity did it take to turn that brass ball into a molten liquid in three seconds? o_o
Yggdrasill4 5 years ago
shit, I hope one day I'll strike water...
gocy 5 years ago
Fox news at its best, truely, truely TRUELY STUPID.
Dont they do any research before being taken in by such share scams.
Minerveral 5 years ago
What they don't mention is that it takes an equal amount of energy to convert the water to hydrogen and oxygen as the amount of energy the flame releases... So you're not really saving anything by doing it.
wwwdotmsndotcom 5 years ago
-__- Uhm
Nittis 5 years ago
LOL. Water is Free hahaha
UAKPlusTen 5 years ago
This is a hoax.
xlt0001 5 years ago
The first hydrogen powered car was invented by a filipino inventor, former NASA engineer, about 30 years ago during the Marcos times.
HotSIzZle12 5 years ago
Cars powered by water/steam have been possible since cars were invented...They could go up to 120 mph. Ford cars were just cheaper than the ones that ran on steam, so they stopped making them. This is old news. Like, a hundred years' old news.
psychotophatcat 5 years ago
Its not steam. He takes water and electricity and converts H20 to HH0.
shibby679 5 years ago
ya u dont even know what your talking bout retard. Steam power is just heating up water turning it to steam which builds up pressure and turns a turbine to power something like a wheel this guy is doing something insanly diffrent
randypanda11 5 years ago
Eh, I watched this when I was half-asleep. Cut me some slack. It makes a lot more sense now.
And, do check your spelling before calling someone else a retard, will you?
psychotophatcat 5 years ago
spelling isnt a sign of intellegence and if your wondering i failed every damn spelling test i was given but atleast i know the concepts of using steam pressure and converting steam to gas which probly involves a process called electrollosis im not sure im not even sure how to spell it
randypanda11 5 years ago
WOW water will be pretty valuable...
domination06 5 years ago
This is awsome!! Where is this guys contact information???
scallan74 5 years ago
i hope this guy is still alive, no thanks to oil companies
Bizkitcan 5 years ago
PEAK OIL KISS MY ASS!
c0baltxxiii 5 years ago