this sounds more like a sequence than atonal though the notes in the motif are very atonal sounding themselves Though the only harmonic context that will fit each motif are polychords. After concluding this I'd have to say it's a atonal sequence that fits into a harmonic polychord structure.
It's good to learn things like this even if you won't use them imo. Mostly because it gets your hands used to doing things of that nature and also helps develop more fretboard freedom. It's why I started learning sweeps and other things. Since then my fingers have felt "lighter" and it's easier to do things like stronger bends and all that on non-neoclassical-type things.
no tonal center...whole tone scale is a symetrical scale..like diminished scale, but diminished scale have 2 modes and the whole tone sacale have just one.
Hey, I get what your saying about about Mustaine's spider pattern, and I have have written a few riffs of my own that use it. However, I also see how this could be applied, as alot of metal bands use chromatics, so I think that the application is not just this particular lick, but rather the idea behind it.
whether or not you can find a way to use it, it's good to learn many different patterns and licks on the guitar. It's always great being a versatile player. It makes you a better player in general
he probly scooped the mids so you can hear the difference between the notes more clearly. Mids add power and tone to a guitars sound, but blur notes together.
Yes, I think he plays through the neck pickup. People almost always use the neck pickup for sweeps. It's hard to see in this video, though. But you can hear it, although his tone/setting is so sharp, that it almost sounds like bridge pickup :)
I think it means (correct me if I'm wrong), that its a scale that doesn't have a key signature. Not like C major or anything but all the notes in the riff aren't supposed to like meld together, very dissonant sounding. My explaining skills suck :D
i know, ive done piano for 7 years, i was saying the way the arpeggio is formed is not the standard arpeggio form its a broken chord arpeggio instead, read what i was replying to.
Yeah, its actually based around a broken diminished arpeggio. If you tab it out it almost fits perfectly into a diminished arpeggio. The second half of the lick (when he gets onto the high 3 strings) actually IS a diminished arp. but the first part is a broken arp.
writing something atonal wouldn't make you a shitty musician, if it's done purposefully. i find atonal stuff hard to write. if you do it accidently, that's never good...
Oh, I didn't mean to imply that I thought he was a shitty musician, it was only meant to be an example of how some comments just talk about how bad someone is at their chosen instrument because they play something that the commenter doesn't like.
He's got plenty of talent, but his style of playing just doesn't fit my tastes.
loomis for the fact that he has more variety in his playing styles... cooley generally sticks to pure speed..... usually... still great mind you... but yeah, as far as feeling goes loomis>cooley imo.
Are you serious? Neither are really completely 'original' original is like Allan Holdsworth or George Lynch. I love Loomis's playing, same with Rusty's.
I don't really think he's more diverse. I think the stuff on youtube is more diverse, but rusty is a jazz player, not a shredder. I'm pretty sure he plays shred because that's what he likes and is good at, but I'm pretty sure Nevermore's album's vs Rusty's, rusty covers a wider range of music.
I love rusty and everything but how exactly is he a jazz player? He's not even what I would call fusion, he just uses some shawn lane and holdsworth licks in his metal playing.
nothing against rusty, because no one could teach anyone how to shred better than rusty, but loomis is 20x better of a MUSICIAN because he focuses on composition as a strength as oppose to just how fucking fast you can play.
rusty blows anyone away as far as speed goes, but if you listen to his solo album... it's compositional qualities are almost non existent.
idk rusty's fast but i still dont know if hes the fastest, because you'd have to compare the excact same lick between two guitarists to see who played it faster. but in the end speed wont get you anywhere anyway without musicality which is why i prefer loomis too.
@acdcislaw now, don't quote me on this but somewhere i heard he pulled off 28 nps alternate picking no sweeping or tapping. All i have to say about his speed is "drum and guitar solo shawn lane" just type that into youtube and looka t that solo XD its killer.
@espChris93 you seem to assume i was randomly basing who's better guitarist on NPS count, i was simply wondering what was lanes fastest, no it does not matter in way of music nor did i infer that it did.
@SaintNate1 speed doesnt matter anyway romeo is incredible theres no denying that but anyone that discredits shawn lane is a fucking idiot. But then again you'd be an idiot to try and compare and over analyze guitar players that just make music. its not a competition
@espChris93 if it wasn't a competition every guitarist would all be paid the same ha. Idk, i haven't really looked into Shawn all to much to be quite honest. If you don't analyze music/musicians then it's kinda jsut nothing. But i do see what your saying, you can't really put them all together for a good comparison.
@SaintNate1 so by those standards linkin park's guitar player is better than both Michael Romeo and Jeff Loomis because he is paid more... i definitly dont think so. Also what I mean by not comparing musicians is everyone views things differently. Of course this applies to music and everyone loves different kinds of music. Just because someone can play a note a second slightly fast than some other guitarist doesnt mean I want to hear his music. Whatever sounds good IS good.
@espChris93 Mo, what i'm saying is, if there was no comp every guitarist would have the same income haha. And what is every is good is good. Doesn't seem right either.
@TheWhocares233 So, if i don't know about one guitarist i don't know anything about music and guitar ha alright ha. So, then your opinion people who don't know who muhammad suicmez they don't know anything about guitar. This new learning amazes me.
@MarcusFenixtheMan nice you copied everything I said and repeated your old immature argument yet again to make yourself look like more like a retard on youtube, congrats!
Well I think Rusty had a lot of great moments on the Outworld debut album compositionally but I am a bigger fan of Loomis' playing. I do respect Rusty a lot for breaking out of the same old tired metal licks though and looking for inspiration from the jazz/fusion area.
Atonality: Take all 12 notes (in this case) and play them in no particular order. Look up tone rows as well. I don't feel like explaining them over a YouTube comment box.
No! This lick is defenitely used in "Born"! And it sounds amazingly good over the rhytm guitar of "Born"! The fact that it is atonal does not at all mean that it doesn't sound good!
this fucked my brain.....
venkutu92 8 months ago
It has a sort of diminished feel to it.
6672rock 8 months ago
@6672rock atonal has no tonal feel it's pretty much chromatic.
rickyvangooberblat 8 months ago
Maybe a whole step scale, no ?
HorusHeresy50 10 months ago
@HorusHeresy50 No, those are called Tritones.
KARVAKY 8 months ago
this sounds more like a sequence than atonal though the notes in the motif are very atonal sounding themselves Though the only harmonic context that will fit each motif are polychords. After concluding this I'd have to say it's a atonal sequence that fits into a harmonic polychord structure.
lukechalaudio 1 year ago
@lukechalaudio NNNEEERRRRDDDD!
ZurabMelua 1 year ago
@ZurabMelua roflmao true
elmingodotcom 1 year ago
not atonal.
maynrdjkeenan 1 year ago
Yes, the tone sucks.... but when you can play like that, who cares?!!
RyanMartinIsForYou 1 year ago
@RyanMartinIsForYou who cares if you can play like that if the tone sucks haha jp
mrsaganscosmos 1 year ago
It's good to learn things like this even if you won't use them imo. Mostly because it gets your hands used to doing things of that nature and also helps develop more fretboard freedom. It's why I started learning sweeps and other things. Since then my fingers have felt "lighter" and it's easier to do things like stronger bends and all that on non-neoclassical-type things.
aero3132 1 year ago
anyone have tabs?
xxxwilcoxxx 1 year ago
this shit sounds so out of this world.
AngryLlamaz 2 years ago 2
Yes, this scale was used in 'Born' solo.
Poltergeist232 2 years ago 8
no es atonal...es la escala simetrica "octafona", compuesta solamente de intervalos de a un tono("whole tone" scale en ingles)
soitupapy 2 years ago
@soitupapy where's the tonal center in a whole tone scale, may I ask? ;)
danielrrjd 2 years ago
no tonal center...whole tone scale is a symetrical scale..like diminished scale, but diminished scale have 2 modes and the whole tone sacale have just one.
soitupapy 2 years ago
Don't get me wrong, Loomis is awesome, but I just don't know when I would use this. At least mustaines spider pattern has more applications.
chillichomper 2 years ago
he uses it and accually this doesnt look that hard to use
wrokjon 2 years ago
Hey, I get what your saying about about Mustaine's spider pattern, and I have have written a few riffs of my own that use it. However, I also see how this could be applied, as alot of metal bands use chromatics, so I think that the application is not just this particular lick, but rather the idea behind it.
SeeThroughDreams 2 years ago
when youre playing the solo for born
hahaha
xEXSEIGEx 2 years ago
it was used in second part of Born solo I guess or something similar:)
HuberttXXX17 2 years ago
im sure he woud find a way tho...
REDTEARS667 2 years ago
whether or not you can find a way to use it, it's good to learn many different patterns and licks on the guitar. It's always great being a versatile player. It makes you a better player in general
WeBelieve2008 2 years ago 2
he probly scooped the mids so you can hear the difference between the notes more clearly. Mids add power and tone to a guitars sound, but blur notes together.
johnnythemonster 2 years ago
is it just me..or the tone is really fucken bad..i hope its me
CreeCore94 2 years ago
yeah its really bad lol far tooo scooped honestly turn up your mids people!
mongobongoman 2 years ago 3
It is you.
LessthanJake14 2 years ago
the tone sucks on all the young guitar videos for every guitarist
pantera1281 2 years ago 39
Except the 2007 Young Guitars for Arch Enemy, check out no.11
bastardsofdecent92 2 years ago
@pantera1281
Haha, not on this one, dude.
InsideYoFeebleBrain 1 year ago
@pantera1281 what about John Petrucci's??
DJspin88988 9 months ago
Definitely not just you. I was going to say that before I saw your comment. Sounds horrible.
Femicide09 2 years ago
i have his guitar and i fuckin love it.
mightyzeus1987 2 years ago 2
does the headstock look half decent?
panteraman44 2 years ago
standard schecter headstock. badass
mightyzeus1987 2 years ago
It basically sounds like a diminished whole tone scale. Is that what this is? Sounds very useful.
mRtReMeLo 2 years ago
is thwere a diminished whole tone? as far as i know there diminished and whole tone or heaxaphonic scale, and the vidoe sounds like whole tone
mariorachid 2 years ago
yeah im sure its wholetone. didnt know you can do a diminished wholetone. i guess. hmm good thought
PestVic 2 years ago
Comment removed
followthereaper12345 2 years ago
A major second is a wholetone. A minor second is a half tone and a diminished second (or wholetone) is unison.
wizardofmadness 2 years ago
What does Atonal mean?
benjie616 2 years ago
a scale that does not fit any of the diatonic scales, and does not have a tonal center
silverkobra 2 years ago
Thanks xD
benjie616 2 years ago
It means it uses so many chromatic notes it doesn't have a scale or a center note.
krakhaid 2 years ago
"tone" means a certain registry of note in which you play in.
the A before "tonal" means "without". So "atonal" means "without a precise tone".
TuonelanJoutsen616 2 years ago
With no specific key.
therox68 2 years ago
its whole tone.
PestVic 2 years ago
out of the key centre
Sudoke94 2 years ago
whole tone
PestVic 2 years ago
shitty sound
FatSlim666 2 years ago
Reminds me Death and chuck scale or smthg.!
korinthios1000 2 years ago
i didnt find it very clean on the beggining of the lick, but i like him anyway.
catapei 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No floyd rose? must be a prototype or something :P
WetFart8000 2 years ago
no his design was specificallly created no floyd he says in one of the other vids it is offerred with a floyd there are two versions
englundisgod 2 years ago 2
Actually, the model with the TOM bridge has been discontinued... for the U.S market at least. I'm not sure how it is for the rest of the world.
krankank 2 years ago
no it is discontinued none here in canada either maybe ebay
englundisgod 2 years ago
Ahh, they don't fetch all that much money on ebay so it is something to consider.
krankank 2 years ago
possibly oh well
englundisgod 2 years ago
nope..some of them are like that, my friend has the exact same one.
XMetaLxManiacX 2 years ago
does anyone have the tab for this?
Striker9233 2 years ago
just look for the born tab this is part of the solo
pandy445 2 years ago
you shouldnt need the tab, he plays it slowly
mjonesy58 2 years ago
hes playing the notes of the diminished 5th interval through octaves
guitar4evr30 2 years ago
he plays it in the neck pickup?
Laiho60 2 years ago
Yes, I think he plays through the neck pickup. People almost always use the neck pickup for sweeps. It's hard to see in this video, though. But you can hear it, although his tone/setting is so sharp, that it almost sounds like bridge pickup :)
fedfyr 2 years ago
hes just taking tri-tones and moving them over a string and up a fret everytime he completes a cycle
so basically
ITS HARD AS FUCK!!!!!!!!
till youve played it enough
then its not too bad
supersax92 2 years ago 3
I have to agree, Rusty is wicked fast.....but who wants to listen to an 8 minute guitar solo? After 3 minutes of shreding it's boring
1979canadian 2 years ago 5
can anyone tell me what atonal means? i'm kinda new to this... thnx
Loomis is
God
ChildOFtheVoid 2 years ago
I was wondering the same thing, but I know that it's a type of melody that is meant to add tension.
kind of like how diminished chords get added into a chord progression to add tension...
now, don't ask me how to fret that ;)
followthereaper12345 2 years ago
it means it doesnt have a tone centre.
surfingdark2 2 years ago 2
I think it means (correct me if I'm wrong), that its a scale that doesn't have a key signature. Not like C major or anything but all the notes in the riff aren't supposed to like meld together, very dissonant sounding. My explaining skills suck :D
SoftShredding 2 years ago
its more of a broken chord. i cant explain for shit either. its a scale that he has changed around. haha
Alphantis 2 years ago
a broken chord is an arpeggio
brandon5pennies 2 years ago 4
i know, ive done piano for 7 years, i was saying the way the arpeggio is formed is not the standard arpeggio form its a broken chord arpeggio instead, read what i was replying to.
Alphantis 2 years ago
Kind of indissernable note tones like you can't tell what the note is.
espltd12 2 years ago
this isn't really atonal. I'm hearing too much diminished I could pick out a tonal center
nlo13 2 years ago
what about the augmented sections?
Walls1441 2 years ago
Its diminished descending then whole tone ascending. Per 3 notes.
viperabs 3 years ago
I wouldn't exactly call it atonal. It sequences itself and has a tonal center.
DivebombJ 3 years ago 4
Yeah, its actually based around a broken diminished arpeggio. If you tab it out it almost fits perfectly into a diminished arpeggio. The second half of the lick (when he gets onto the high 3 strings) actually IS a diminished arp. but the first part is a broken arp.
GutiarFag 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is it me? Is it my ears that make this sound like utter shit?
rok420 3 years ago
Well thats the idea! Its atonal, and a lick like this is applied to add tension to a section.
untitledundefined 3 years ago 6
Well, I can't argue with that logic. It certainly IS atonal, and it would add tension to any piece of music that it was in...
Eh, still don't think it's a great lick, but I'm not going to go on about how shitty of a musician the guy is because of it.
And hey, thanks for being mature about responding to my comment instead of acting like some twelve year old fanboy.
rok420 3 years ago
writing something atonal wouldn't make you a shitty musician, if it's done purposefully. i find atonal stuff hard to write. if you do it accidently, that's never good...
jd36 3 years ago 5
Oh, I didn't mean to imply that I thought he was a shitty musician, it was only meant to be an example of how some comments just talk about how bad someone is at their chosen instrument because they play something that the commenter doesn't like.
He's got plenty of talent, but his style of playing just doesn't fit my tastes.
rok420 3 years ago
loomis beats cooley but isk bout romeo
bodomx61x 3 years ago
lol no he doesn't. read loomis's comments on rusty's videos. he cant play like cooley can.
GitarrPwnz 3 years ago
Shit's insane. Look at his face, it's like he's watching bob ross painting about to fall asleep while he does that part...he's beyond great.
goodfellatn 3 years ago
and loomis vs romeo?
mizoreXSymphony 3 years ago
Jeff Loomis VS Rusty Cooley.
Opinions?
yootubematt 3 years ago
loomis for the fact that he has more variety in his playing styles... cooley generally sticks to pure speed..... usually... still great mind you... but yeah, as far as feeling goes loomis>cooley imo.
edgecrushers 3 years ago
2 of my favorite players and 2 very original shredders, thats a tough one. Musically i'd have to go for Loomis but rusty always makes my jaw drop.
tamboid12 3 years ago
Are you serious? Neither are really completely 'original' original is like Allan Holdsworth or George Lynch. I love Loomis's playing, same with Rusty's.
6Vital6Remains6 3 years ago
LOL George Lynch isn't original. He's a rip off of Eddie Van Halen.
Joshplaysinstruments 3 years ago
no way its the other way around
just kidding just kidding ... haha
espChris93 3 years ago
Wow, thats a tough one, I gotta go with jeff but rusty never fails to amaze me.
Violencedefined666 3 years ago
jeff, easily. he has much more diverse playing then rusty, but, rusty is a pretty amazing player
JonnEh243 3 years ago 2
I don't really think he's more diverse. I think the stuff on youtube is more diverse, but rusty is a jazz player, not a shredder. I'm pretty sure he plays shred because that's what he likes and is good at, but I'm pretty sure Nevermore's album's vs Rusty's, rusty covers a wider range of music.
GitarrPwnz 3 years ago
I love rusty and everything but how exactly is he a jazz player? He's not even what I would call fusion, he just uses some shawn lane and holdsworth licks in his metal playing.
xelad1 3 years ago
nothing against rusty, because no one could teach anyone how to shred better than rusty, but loomis is 20x better of a MUSICIAN because he focuses on composition as a strength as oppose to just how fucking fast you can play.
rusty blows anyone away as far as speed goes, but if you listen to his solo album... it's compositional qualities are almost non existent.
followthereaper12345 2 years ago 3
idk rusty's fast but i still dont know if hes the fastest, because you'd have to compare the excact same lick between two guitarists to see who played it faster. but in the end speed wont get you anywhere anyway without musicality which is why i prefer loomis too.
espChris93 2 years ago
Shawn Lane was probably a huge influence in that. Of course, Shawn played faster than anyone today can.
danuu2 2 years ago 24
i'm definitely not dissing shawn, i love his music, but tiago della vega is now officially the fastest. but you can hardly call it music lol
Deconstrukt666 2 years ago
That guy can't play a song other than "Flight Of The Bumblebee", therefore, he is negated.
danuu2 2 years ago
@danuu2 don't forget jason beckar i'm sure he did some crazy shit like this during rehearsals and before he became a mannequin :(
demigod325 1 year ago
@danuu2 agreed
TokaCola 1 year ago
@danuu2
Can't Buckethead beat him?
Just a question, It's not my intention to start a flamewar.
ChaosAngel092 1 year ago
@ChaosAngel092 no. Not even rusty cooley can beat shawn lanes speed.
TheWhocares233 1 year ago
@TheWhocares233 whats Shawn lanes fastest nps count?
acdcislaw 1 year ago
@acdcislaw now, don't quote me on this but somewhere i heard he pulled off 28 nps alternate picking no sweeping or tapping. All i have to say about his speed is "drum and guitar solo shawn lane" just type that into youtube and looka t that solo XD its killer.
TheWhocares233 1 year ago
@acdcislaw haha oh boy... music is music, its not about who has the highest NPS count. Come on seriously
espChris93 1 year ago
@espChris93 you seem to assume i was randomly basing who's better guitarist on NPS count, i was simply wondering what was lanes fastest, no it does not matter in way of music nor did i infer that it did.
acdcislaw 1 year ago
@danuu2 what are you smoking rusty cooley is so much faster than him hahaah
SaintNate1 1 year ago
@SaintNate1 not at all haha, when Rusty plays simple string skipping patterns he's still barely as fast as Lane when he's destroying licks at mach 1
espChris93 1 year ago
@espChris93 who is this lane you speak of
SaintNate1 1 year ago
@SaintNate1 idk if your being sarcastic but its Shawn Lane
espChris93 1 year ago
@espChris93 So, your telling me that michael romeo want to be is faster than rusty boy?
SaintNate1 1 year ago
@SaintNate1 speed doesnt matter anyway romeo is incredible theres no denying that but anyone that discredits shawn lane is a fucking idiot. But then again you'd be an idiot to try and compare and over analyze guitar players that just make music. its not a competition
espChris93 1 year ago
@espChris93 if it wasn't a competition every guitarist would all be paid the same ha. Idk, i haven't really looked into Shawn all to much to be quite honest. If you don't analyze music/musicians then it's kinda jsut nothing. But i do see what your saying, you can't really put them all together for a good comparison.
SaintNate1 1 year ago
@SaintNate1 so by those standards linkin park's guitar player is better than both Michael Romeo and Jeff Loomis because he is paid more... i definitly dont think so. Also what I mean by not comparing musicians is everyone views things differently. Of course this applies to music and everyone loves different kinds of music. Just because someone can play a note a second slightly fast than some other guitarist doesnt mean I want to hear his music. Whatever sounds good IS good.
espChris93 1 year ago
@espChris93 Mo, what i'm saying is, if there was no comp every guitarist would have the same income haha. And what is every is good is good. Doesn't seem right either.
SaintNate1 1 year ago
@SaintNate1 You just called Shawn lane a michael remo want to be?....You might as well just admit you don't know what you are talking about...AT ALL
TheWhocares233 1 year ago
@TheWhocares233 So, if i don't know about one guitarist i don't know anything about music and guitar ha alright ha. So, then your opinion people who don't know who muhammad suicmez they don't know anything about guitar. This new learning amazes me.
SaintNate1 1 year ago
@SaintNate1 well, i wouldn't call muhamed suicmez a want to be. i would look him up first if i didn't know who he was to see how good he was.
TheWhocares233 1 year ago
@TheWhocares233 Muhammad isn't a want a be at all he is da best hahah. Naw, i see what your saying though. I've only watch one vid of shawn guy
SaintNate1 1 year ago
@SaintNate1 look up some of shawns technique videos... then look up some of his songs. He has the ultimate combination of technique,speed and melody
TheWhocares233 1 year ago
@danuu2 of course.... that's the least applicable comment I've seen in the last year.
LydianHarmony 1 year ago
@danuu2 I don't know... Have you heard the new MAB's track "On The Double"?It has a part that is probably faster than everything.BTW Jeff kicks ass.
VMP007 1 year ago
@danuu2 Rusty Cooley, Francesco, Tiago?
SpaceEater1000 1 year ago
@SpaceEater1000 took my words lol
jonathanbenaroche 1 year ago
@danuu2 i beg the differ check out della vega he is the fastest electric guitarist I know of
lukechalaudio 1 year ago
@lukechalaudio there's a difference between being fast and making music and being fast just to break speed records..
metallica5252 11 months ago
@metallica5252 I just provided a music theory explanation for what he is doing that's all.
lukechalaudio 11 months ago
@metallica5252 there's a difference between being not gay and you
MarcusFenixtheMan 11 months ago
@MarcusFenixtheMan no one asked you to chime in with your retarded immature comments you must be like 12..
metallica5252 11 months ago
@metallica5252 no one asked you to prove to us how gay you are with your retarded immature comments
MarcusFenixtheMan 11 months ago
@MarcusFenixtheMan nice you copied everything I said and repeated your old immature argument yet again to make yourself look like more like a retard on youtube, congrats!
metallica5252 11 months ago
@MarcusFenixtheMan someone's a homophobe?
James0543 11 months ago
@James0543 someone likes sucking big cock?
MarcusFenixtheMan 11 months ago
@MarcusFenixtheMan oh tough guy on internetz me so scurred..
James0543 11 months ago
@James0543 you be good or i'll sick young zangief on you for teh lulz
MarcusFenixtheMan 11 months ago
Well I think Rusty had a lot of great moments on the Outworld debut album compositionally but I am a bigger fan of Loomis' playing. I do respect Rusty a lot for breaking out of the same old tired metal licks though and looking for inspiration from the jazz/fusion area.
xelad1 2 years ago
Atonality: Take all 12 notes (in this case) and play them in no particular order. Look up tone rows as well. I don't feel like explaining them over a YouTube comment box.
danuu2 2 years ago
That depends on the underlying harmony, I can play all 12 notes and be in C major.
oregonskateok 2 years ago
shawn lane was much faster than rusty
brandon5pennies 2 years ago 5
guy should be stored away somewhere in a mental home. jesus
uli87 3 years ago
No! This lick is defenitely used in "Born"! And it sounds amazingly good over the rhytm guitar of "Born"! The fact that it is atonal does not at all mean that it doesn't sound good!
Zorgorath 3 years ago 8
I think it's pretty damn amazing to play atonal to begin with. It's harder than it seems.
SunlessSkyGuitar 3 years ago
i sure have a rough time with it. ive found the better i learn to stick with traditional music theory, the better i can veer away from it at will
shredtasticbeest 3 years ago
isn't squeal dude, justta a bend...k
guitarspectre 3 years ago 25
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That squeal at the end is so awesome
iamrichlol 3 years ago
Yes, this is in born, second to last lick in the solo.
arod1989 3 years ago
Shit, I meant, is this in Born.
Double checking both, yeah, he does use this at the end of the solo.
AnthonyParalikas 3 years ago 3
Is this is Born?
AnthonyParalikas 3 years ago 2
great great! That's what great atonal music sounds like!
pattttttrick 3 years ago
how*
pattttttrick 3 years ago