your information is going by the way we use the words today.
to "cover a man of his nudity" actually was a loosly translated adaptation by King James. What ham did was Ham had sex with one of Noah's Wives. Noah knew of this as he awoke, meaning that his wife told him of the events on noahs's, nakedness, or absence of the events
Lev 20.11 explains what "SAW HIS FATHERS NAKEDNESS" means....Another point ! Gen 5.32 Noah was 500 yrs old, and Noah begot Shem, Ham and Japheth...What does that tell you? and then Noah went on to live to be 950yrs....Another thing Noah was a righteous/just man and PERFECT in his GENEALOGY which is why Gen 5.8 Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord....His GENES where PERFECT (no race mixing/pure) and he was a just man. Noah cursed Canaan not God....Ham committed an awful sin.
Good for you Torahrevival...Something for the commenters to consider though...Cover up his father? First of all Ham did not see his father Noah lying in a bed NAKED !! and run off to tell his brothers that. So if there are others that take that verse to literally....Cont'd
The treatment of conquering nations & their treatment of exiles were clearly different, the people either served them & some were treated as Slaves. if we look at the bible regarding oppressing people, killing them, treating them badly we can see these people were treated as slaves and that in the bible is unexceptable, look at the history of nations that done it, they did not get rewarded for treating people as slaves. Our own time also shows the difference in how our Rulers treat us.
an interesting thing i have learnt on here about Canaanites, they were the most numbered people on the planet, The table of nations following the breakaway from the three Sons, the canannites spread as far as Australia, NZ & other places whilist the other groups were smaller in number but more dominant. Im not sure if this is true or not, but if it is Canaanites have their roots in many countries as indigious people & were not slaves. there is a difference between slave & servents.
i love black people their just az important az us whitefolk. such a lie that the curse ov ham made the blackz, bullcrap. would,nt want live in just a white world, it showz how diverse our father iz. nobody,z better than otherz thatz an imbalance, not good,peace 2 all. amen
ham shem an japhet were all black brothers, check songs of soloman 1,5 kjv (black as the tents of kedar) kedar means dark skin, who was a black shemite arab
The curse of Ham is full of shit. All of Canaan's descendants would've been killed during the Global Great Deluge (there would be no living descendants left anyway)
Secondly, If Jesus Christ died on the cross, he would've died for everyone's sins and revoked all curses from God.
Wa Tutsi tribe, Sudanese are likely the ancient Egyptians according to Ezekiel 29. African Americans curses can be found in full in Deuteronomy 28:15-68, under the curses of the Israelites. American whites can be found in the book of Obadiah as Esau (Edom). The lineage of Esau includes, Canaanites (Leprosy), Horites (Cave Dwellers), Japheth (Ashkenaz) and the Ishmaelites. Asia and their curses can be found in the Apocrypha, 2 Esdras.
@Everybody - There is no curse in the bible to turn a person black. There is a curse in the bible to turn a person white (Leprosy [ White skin/ yellow hair]). The curse of Gehazi (Canaanite) was hereditary. Canaan was not cursed to be a bondman, but a servant.
@Nightice3 Good point! But friend did u no that the modern day Kanaanites are the chinese and that they fit the curse of Kanaan like a glove?! They're bondservants to the shemites---the modern day Edomites, the jewish people.
I'll finish his closing/cut-off point: The "curse of Ham" came from whites who wanted to dominate the slaves in the Americas. The slaves could not read, but were God-fearing. They, desiring to please God, believed the lies that they were a cursed race (for a while), meant for servlitude by God & served willingly.
It was a concocted lie from the beginning. Canaan was the only one who was cursed - having nothing to do w/skin color, but w/Israel's future & self-designed struggle - to this very day
@aydyar08 Correction---Kanaan's curse also involve his skin as well as his face. This is not to say that "Black people" are modern day Kanaanites; This is however to say that Black people are modern day Kanaanites.
@leavethisnation - 2 Kings 5:27 The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper [as white] as snow.
The people of Lebanon have suffered and been oppressed since ancient times so they could be said to be cursed, so could all the people of the middle east if you want to believe this nonsensical rubbish of their being a curse over a continent of people because of a man named Noah and his son Ham who probably didnt even exist.
what a fool, if you would do ferther research you would know that ham had sex with his father in his drunken state, that was why he was cursed, and ham was already black before he was cursed
@SirHappyThe1st go to hell with your second hand knowledge..dont tell me not true with no explanation..u think i giva shit what your parents taught you? what makes you think they know anything??!! the proof is in the research..there more out there than just the bible....ham sexually assaulted his father becasue they had some kind of dispute..he was already black, all the children of israel were black skinned, and if u read the bible it clearly describes their color aswell..try reading it
@lyfe1zruff one more thing,it said in deuterotemy.. since we have disobeyed god we would be scattered through out the nations, and sent by SHIP! with irons around our neccks to a foreign land to serve our enemies, our names would no longer be ours n we would lose the history wich g0d has given us..who else went threw that? huh? not these so called jews..black ppl r the only ones that went threw that..read the bible more carefully..black ppl r treated the way we are today because we disobeyed g0d
Well for one ancient Canaan was in present day Lebanon and the israelites at that time were on the verge of taking the land and the story of Noah was seen as legitmate reasoning for taking the land from the inhabitants.
How can darker skin be a curse when its the dominant colour of most of the human race?
@SirHappyThe1st Only in Lebanon? Or where more modern day countries, part of ancient Canaan? Like the land we now call Israel, the occupied territories, parts of Jordan, parts of Syria, etc.,
Black skin a curse!? I don't beleive in ufo's, witches, ghosts, talking snakes, burning bushes, men walking on water, virgings giving birth to children,.....CURSES and for that matter! But that's just my opinion!
@amster2007dam you can google or even type it in on youtube and there will be some documentation..all of that ham cursed with blackness crap came from the mormans its nowere in the bible, ham was already black, how could u be cursed for laughing at someones nakedness..be serious our loving God cursed a man with blackness n his generations to come cuz he laughed at a naked man?
@lyfe1zruff I am aware of the stories about the so-called curse of Cham! But I have never found any proof of this in the bible. But God cursing a man with blackness isn't such a strange idea if you read the bible. But I don't beleive that there is a God, so for me it is all stone-age thinking! I would just say, grow up and leave this silly book alone. Again; snakes and/or burning bushes don't talk, vrigins can't be pregnant, men can't walk on water, a worldwide flood never happend, etc! GROW UP!
why didnt he explain further @7:20 who the third brother PUT and his people were! why......seriously ait down and think of a reason that this man left out PUT and who they were and who they dominated!?.......
why didnt he explain further @7:20 who the third brother PUT and his people were! why......seriously ait down and think of a reason that this man left out PUT and who they were and who they dominated!?
why didnt he explain further @7:20 who the third brother PUT and his people were! why......seriously sit down and think of a reason that this man left out PUT and who they were and who they dominated!?
@ruthless6661 Last I heard the old testament was written by Jews. Muslims teach this shit to. Muslims enslave the sons of Ham to this day. How is something not even written by white Europe white supremacist?
@fukstick40 WHY WOULD MUSLIMS TEACH RASIST FILTH FROM THE BIBLE ITS A FUKIN MAN MADE BOOK BY WHITE MEN THATS WHY UR GOD IS WHITE WITH BLUE EYES AND MUHAMMEDS MUM WAS BLACK
I have never heard this interpretation. I found it quite interesting and honestly, it make a hell of a lot more sense. I was raised with the racist crap. I've never heard it rebutted until now. Thank you. I'm going to shove this down their throats.
Points to ponder: Yowceph, descendant of Shem, wasn't recognized by his brethren while amidst the children of Mitsrayim as a "ruler." Why not? Foreigners referred to the WHOLE funeral procession of Ya'aqob/Yisra'el as "Egyptians." Why? Mosheh, a "prince" in "Egypt," was sought out after killing a Hebrew "servant." Why? Why does the author of Genesis give such a descriptive account of 'Esav than Ya'aqob? Why are the children of 'Esav synonymous with "Hellen/Greeks" in the book of Maccabees? Why?
If Cham was "black," why are we to assume that his brothers, Shem and Yepheth weren't? Or his parents, for that matter? Was Cham "black," Shem, "white" and Yepheth "in between?" Can this be proven? Now, Cham had four sons. Kuwsh, Mitsrayim, Puwt and Kena'an. In this case, Kena'an was cursed, not the others. Are we to believe, then, that every "black" person is descended from this one son? The children of Kuwsh, Mitsrayim and Puwt no longer exist? This would have to be the case, would it not?
@PoorKnow To my understanding, Ham was not black, but his son Cush was ("black face") = father of the Ethiopians. The other sons were not black, nor were the Canaanites. The curse is not related to blackness, but to servlitude; brought up/on by Canaan's disrespect. And it did come to pass - not "because" of him, but it was an opportunity to disclose the prophecy. When the Israelites inherited Canaan they were to utterly drive out/kill the inhabitants. They didn't & had to put them to tribute.
For the record, this "curse" became fulfilled when Yisra'el began occupying the land of Kena'an. This "curse" had nothing, at all, to do with the hue of any person, or nation. If anything, most people, during this period were, probably, somewhat dark in appearance, which had nothing to do with climate or location. Consider the Eskimos, who've been inhabiting the most northern regions of North America for quite some time. Shalowm, 'Ach.
Ham`s decendents the cannaties inhabit present day lebanon. It has nothing to do with black people. It was a Jewish curse on the people of Lebanon because they wanted their land.
@SirHappyThe o children of israel are ye not like the children of ethiopea unto me? o children of israelwhat are ethiopean?? black skinned..moses turned white and leprous for speaking against moses's wife..for her to turn white she must have been as dark as moses..they describe christs color as being like that of burned brass, thats dark if u ask me, so whose that cracker wit bloc hair n blue eyes in every church in america?
It seems that the "prophetic" downfall of the black race and other so called inferior races is down to the will of its own people who still refuse to wake up from its un-concious state.
Just because of a deep in-grained belief in a / the creator does not mean you cannot question the authority of any authors writings?
Please do not take offense / offence as none is intented.
please tell me what bible version you are using i like the layout of that bible please tell me what version and where i can get a copy of it please send me the link when you respond i would greatly appreciate it thankyou
Canaan is serving the nations too as mostly MERCHANTS and MANUFACTURERS, BUT are as well serving various tribes of Israel, even in our lowly state.
Two more videos to look at:
This first one is somewhat humorous, YouTu search for "CNN: Outsourcing the Bible to China" and "Made in China". Does it make sense who has the highest probablity of being from Canaan?
Cross reference: Gen. 11:10-26; Generations from Shem to Abram.
I need to clarify that I didn't write that Canaan has been oppressed to this day. I wrote that Canaan has been serving his brethren to this day. Yephet through serving the euro-economic system of capitalism/consumerism (english is the world language of business) and Shem through carry-outs and American black hair care, both big businesses in the 'hood. I'll prove it all with one video.
I wasn't consciously aware of it at first, but this video corresponds and sufficiently fulfills the prophecy of the divine curses as a sign and wonder of disobedience in Yisrael NOT keeping the Laws of YHWH.
Did you do the youtube search and watched the video? The answer should CLICK after watching the video.
The plight of black americans, Shem, is different from that of Canaan. The scions of Shem through Yacov/12 tribes suppose to be serving YHWH, but when we aren't serving Him properly in obedience, we end up serving nations YHWH sends against us; servants of YHWH or servants of who YHWH sends against us...
Canaan's scions were prophecsized to be servant of servants. The Divine Order of YHWH on earth suppose to place Israel as the head and all of the other brethren serving them (Cham and Yapeth); read Deu 28:1,12-13. But we haven't gotten back to YHWH in obedience yet, so we have been brought low; read Deu 28:43-44. The prophecy says servant OF SERVANTS. The tribes are serving vile nations, because they are not serving YHWH.
and they forgot the Lord who had created them in the earth; and the inhabitants of the earth made unto themselves, at that time, every man his god; gods of wood and stone which could neither speak, hear, nor deliver, and the sons of men served them and they became their gods."
Something to consider is how did Noah know who did this and what was done to him (blood somewhere)? Perhaps this isn't the first time Canaan has done something like this. This would be shameful to Cham, so I understand why he would perhaps tell his brothers and maybe go to seek out his son as well. If Cham did something wrong, HE would have been cursed.
Canaan was the culprit, but some english bibles interprets/translates Gen 9:24 differently.
Some bibles read 'younger' or 'youngest'. It couldn't have been his technical youngest son, Yepeth, because it wouldn't make sense to prophecy a curse of Canaan. What has been forgotten is a old Yiree tradition of staying with the Grandfather for a time to learn the laws/path to YHWH; they are taught and treated like sons. Abram learned this from his Grand-great-forefather Shem (ref: Book of Jasher/Book of the Upright Record).
Servant of Servants is the main idea of this prophecy of Noah.
The descendents of Canaan serve the (Shemitic)Yisraeleem today in their captivity, especially in America. Canaan's children have even served Yepeth's descendents today through manufacturing goods to even forsaking their own heritage and language to completely assimilate to achieve more of the Capitalistic/"Ameri-European Dream". Has Canaan ever ruled over a people without serving at least one or two of his brethren?
Something else must be clarified (many different off-translations). Gen 9:27.
In the Hebrew Interlinear Bible the main idea is that Canaan would serve his brethren, most notably Yepeth and Shem. Yepeth would (be deceived/deceptively [ פתה(pathah) Strong's Concord. #06601)] dwell in the tabernacle of Shem.
Yasher 9:5-6 ~ "5 And when Abram came out from the cave, he went to Noah and his son Shem, and he remained with them to learn the instruction of the Lord and his ways, and no man knew where Abram was, and Abram served Noah and Shem his son for a long time.
6 And Abram was in Noah's house thirty-nine years, and Abram knew the Lord from three years old, and he went in the ways of the Lord until the day of his death, as Noah and his son Shem had taught him; and all the sons of the earth in those days greatly transgressed against the Lord, and they rebelled against him and they served other gods,
Under what authority is NOAH given the right to curse anyone?
Why would Canaan, an innocent be cursed.
The whole story is propaganda to justify the conquest and domination of the so-called Canaanites. It was written AFTER the conquest and not before. It is like me in 2008 predicting the germans would be defeated in 1945 because Hitler snubbed Jesse Owens. It's not prophecy. It's injecting propaganda into history.
Yahweh Blessed Ham, his brothers and Noah. Noah can't curse after Yahweh blessed. Canaan was the 4th son of Ham. why the 4th son ? find out what happened in the tent and you'll know why the 4th son.
And behold! Allah will say(On Judgment Day): "O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah.?" He will say: "Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, thou wouldst indeed have known it. Thou knowest what is in my heart, Thou I know not what is in Thine. For Thou knowest in full all that is hidden."
To speak in the Messiah's name does not mean I think he is the Almighty. It just means that I am speaking as a follower of him. It means I recognise his athority over me. It's like a subject of a king who speaks int he name of a king.
Gen 9:25 And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; A SERVANT OF SERVANTS shall he be unto his brethren.
Canaan Ham' fourth son became a nation of Merchantlike Tradein [Tyre] hence A SERVANT of SERVANTRY thus becoming today A SERGEANT [Government] Of The Servantlike [Citizens] shall he [this governance] be unto his brethren [fellow citizens]
The Merchants have been making merchandise of men thus Yeshua expelled this curse from HIS FATHERS HOUSE and today within OUR MEMBERS expel such enemies of YHVH
your information is going by the way we use the words today.
to "cover a man of his nudity" actually was a loosly translated adaptation by King James. What ham did was Ham had sex with one of Noah's Wives. Noah knew of this as he awoke, meaning that his wife told him of the events on noahs's, nakedness, or absence of the events
RobeonMew02 2 weeks ago
FUCK YOUR FILTHY EVIL GOD
monkeypeopleofearth 1 month ago
Lev 20.11 explains what "SAW HIS FATHERS NAKEDNESS" means....Another point ! Gen 5.32 Noah was 500 yrs old, and Noah begot Shem, Ham and Japheth...What does that tell you? and then Noah went on to live to be 950yrs....Another thing Noah was a righteous/just man and PERFECT in his GENEALOGY which is why Gen 5.8 Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord....His GENES where PERFECT (no race mixing/pure) and he was a just man. Noah cursed Canaan not God....Ham committed an awful sin.
mssquirrely 1 month ago
Good for you Torahrevival...Something for the commenters to consider though...Cover up his father? First of all Ham did not see his father Noah lying in a bed NAKED !! and run off to tell his brothers that. So if there are others that take that verse to literally....Cont'd
mssquirrely 1 month ago
3 son's, white, oriental, and black.
yup5220 2 months ago
The treatment of conquering nations & their treatment of exiles were clearly different, the people either served them & some were treated as Slaves. if we look at the bible regarding oppressing people, killing them, treating them badly we can see these people were treated as slaves and that in the bible is unexceptable, look at the history of nations that done it, they did not get rewarded for treating people as slaves. Our own time also shows the difference in how our Rulers treat us.
MistyMarie1970 2 months ago
an interesting thing i have learnt on here about Canaanites, they were the most numbered people on the planet, The table of nations following the breakaway from the three Sons, the canannites spread as far as Australia, NZ & other places whilist the other groups were smaller in number but more dominant. Im not sure if this is true or not, but if it is Canaanites have their roots in many countries as indigious people & were not slaves. there is a difference between slave & servents.
MistyMarie1970 2 months ago
i love black people their just az important az us whitefolk. such a lie that the curse ov ham made the blackz, bullcrap. would,nt want live in just a white world, it showz how diverse our father iz. nobody,z better than otherz thatz an imbalance, not good,peace 2 all. amen
orionconflict2007 5 months ago
Bible the Torah the Quran ALL say blacks are cursed....lol
mrtundra45 6 months ago
@mrtundra45 You have never read a bible before, so dont speak on things you dont know about.
Herc2770 4 months ago
@Herc2770 who cares the bible is fake written and rewritten over millenias by men....not god or the holy spirit....just men.
mrtundra45 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrtundra45 Wrong. And so dont speak.
Herc2770 4 months ago
stop using the bible its all fake
MrCarbonbase 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ham shem an japhet were all black brothers, check songs of soloman 1,5 kjv (black as the tents of kedar) kedar means dark skin, who was a black shemite arab
STARMANGER 7 months ago
The curse of Ham is full of shit. All of Canaan's descendants would've been killed during the Global Great Deluge (there would be no living descendants left anyway)
Secondly, If Jesus Christ died on the cross, he would've died for everyone's sins and revoked all curses from God.
thatkid1011 7 months ago
Wa Tutsi tribe, Sudanese are likely the ancient Egyptians according to Ezekiel 29. African Americans curses can be found in full in Deuteronomy 28:15-68, under the curses of the Israelites. American whites can be found in the book of Obadiah as Esau (Edom). The lineage of Esau includes, Canaanites (Leprosy), Horites (Cave Dwellers), Japheth (Ashkenaz) and the Ishmaelites. Asia and their curses can be found in the Apocrypha, 2 Esdras.
Nightice3 8 months ago
Comment removed
Nightice3 8 months ago
@Everybody - There is no curse in the bible to turn a person black. There is a curse in the bible to turn a person white (Leprosy [ White skin/ yellow hair]). The curse of Gehazi (Canaanite) was hereditary. Canaan was not cursed to be a bondman, but a servant.
Nightice3 8 months ago
@Nightice3 Good point! But friend did u no that the modern day Kanaanites are the chinese and that they fit the curse of Kanaan like a glove?! They're bondservants to the shemites---the modern day Edomites, the jewish people.
leavethisnation 8 months ago
I'll finish his closing/cut-off point: The "curse of Ham" came from whites who wanted to dominate the slaves in the Americas. The slaves could not read, but were God-fearing. They, desiring to please God, believed the lies that they were a cursed race (for a while), meant for servlitude by God & served willingly.
It was a concocted lie from the beginning. Canaan was the only one who was cursed - having nothing to do w/skin color, but w/Israel's future & self-designed struggle - to this very day
aydyar08 8 months ago
@aydyar08 Correction---Kanaan's curse also involve his skin as well as his face. This is not to say that "Black people" are modern day Kanaanites; This is however to say that Black people are modern day Kanaanites.
leavethisnation 8 months ago
@leavethisnation - 2 Kings 5:27 The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper [as white] as snow.
Nightice3 8 months ago
@Nightice3 Good point!
leavethisnation 8 months ago
The people of Lebanon have suffered and been oppressed since ancient times so they could be said to be cursed, so could all the people of the middle east if you want to believe this nonsensical rubbish of their being a curse over a continent of people because of a man named Noah and his son Ham who probably didnt even exist.
SirHappyThe1st 4 seconds ago
SirHappyThe1st 10 months ago
what a fool, if you would do ferther research you would know that ham had sex with his father in his drunken state, that was why he was cursed, and ham was already black before he was cursed
lyfe1zruff 11 months ago
@lyfe1zruff
Not true.
SirHappyThe1st 11 months ago
@SirHappyThe1st go to hell with your second hand knowledge..dont tell me not true with no explanation..u think i giva shit what your parents taught you? what makes you think they know anything??!! the proof is in the research..there more out there than just the bible....ham sexually assaulted his father becasue they had some kind of dispute..he was already black, all the children of israel were black skinned, and if u read the bible it clearly describes their color aswell..try reading it
lyfe1zruff 11 months ago
@lyfe1zruff one more thing,it said in deuterotemy.. since we have disobeyed god we would be scattered through out the nations, and sent by SHIP! with irons around our neccks to a foreign land to serve our enemies, our names would no longer be ours n we would lose the history wich g0d has given us..who else went threw that? huh? not these so called jews..black ppl r the only ones that went threw that..read the bible more carefully..black ppl r treated the way we are today because we disobeyed g0d
lyfe1zruff 11 months ago
Comment removed
SirHappyThe1st 10 months ago
@lyfe1zruff
Noah cursed Ham son Canann, the descendants of Canaan are Lebanese since Canaan is in present day lebanon.
Besides the Bible says nothing about Ham or his descendants skin turning black but dont let that stop you from believing what you want.
SirHappyThe1st 10 months ago
@SirHappyThe1st the descendants of Canaan are Lebanese! Proof please!?
amster2007dam 9 months ago
@amster2007dam
Well for one ancient Canaan was in present day Lebanon and the israelites at that time were on the verge of taking the land and the story of Noah was seen as legitmate reasoning for taking the land from the inhabitants.
How can darker skin be a curse when its the dominant colour of most of the human race?
SirHappyThe1st 9 months ago
@SirHappyThe1st Only in Lebanon? Or where more modern day countries, part of ancient Canaan? Like the land we now call Israel, the occupied territories, parts of Jordan, parts of Syria, etc.,
Black skin a curse!? I don't beleive in ufo's, witches, ghosts, talking snakes, burning bushes, men walking on water, virgings giving birth to children,.....CURSES and for that matter! But that's just my opinion!
amster2007dam 9 months ago
@amster2007dam
I agree with everything you just said. But if you take the curse seriously it was directed at the people of the present day middle east.
Anyone stupid enough to believe that a whole generations of people can be cursed for the actions of one man needs an education.
Lastly are we not all supposed to be cursed with 'original sin' if u believe that kind of thing?
SirHappyThe1st 9 months ago
@lyfe1zruff Hhahahahahhaha.....Cham sexually assaulted his father!? Proof please!?
amster2007dam 9 months ago
@amster2007dam you can google or even type it in on youtube and there will be some documentation..all of that ham cursed with blackness crap came from the mormans its nowere in the bible, ham was already black, how could u be cursed for laughing at someones nakedness..be serious our loving God cursed a man with blackness n his generations to come cuz he laughed at a naked man?
lyfe1zruff 9 months ago
@lyfe1zruff I am aware of the stories about the so-called curse of Cham! But I have never found any proof of this in the bible. But God cursing a man with blackness isn't such a strange idea if you read the bible. But I don't beleive that there is a God, so for me it is all stone-age thinking! I would just say, grow up and leave this silly book alone. Again; snakes and/or burning bushes don't talk, vrigins can't be pregnant, men can't walk on water, a worldwide flood never happend, etc! GROW UP!
amster2007dam 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lyfe1zruff Cham sexually assaulted his father!!!!???? Proof please!
amster2007dam 9 months ago
only one o f hams suns were cursed therefore only a specific section of blacks would be cursed..
coilzard 1 year ago
@coilzard thaaaank youuuu!!!!!
lyfe1zruff 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why didnt he explain further @7:20 who the third brother PUT and his people were! why......seriously ait down and think of a reason that this man left out PUT and who they were and who they dominated!?.......
qwezzie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why didnt he explain further @7:20 who the third brother PUT and his people were! why......seriously ait down and think of a reason that this man left out PUT and who they were and who they dominated!?
qwezzie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why didnt he explain further @7:20 who the third brother PUT and his people were! why......seriously sit down and think of a reason that this man left out PUT and who they were and who they dominated!?
qwezzie 1 year ago
Comment removed
qwezzie 1 year ago
CHRISTIANITY THE RELIGON OF WHITE SURPREMACY
ruthless6661 1 year ago
@ruthless6661 Last I heard the old testament was written by Jews. Muslims teach this shit to. Muslims enslave the sons of Ham to this day. How is something not even written by white Europe white supremacist?
fukstick40 1 year ago
@fukstick40 WHY WOULD MUSLIMS TEACH RASIST FILTH FROM THE BIBLE ITS A FUKIN MAN MADE BOOK BY WHITE MEN THATS WHY UR GOD IS WHITE WITH BLUE EYES AND MUHAMMEDS MUM WAS BLACK
ruthless6661 1 year ago
whats the song at the bgining?
pologeo17 1 year ago
good video bro, but the romans were edomites check my page for proof
STARMANGER 1 year ago
I have never heard this interpretation. I found it quite interesting and honestly, it make a hell of a lot more sense. I was raised with the racist crap. I've never heard it rebutted until now. Thank you. I'm going to shove this down their throats.
cerebulon 1 year ago
Points to ponder: Yowceph, descendant of Shem, wasn't recognized by his brethren while amidst the children of Mitsrayim as a "ruler." Why not? Foreigners referred to the WHOLE funeral procession of Ya'aqob/Yisra'el as "Egyptians." Why? Mosheh, a "prince" in "Egypt," was sought out after killing a Hebrew "servant." Why? Why does the author of Genesis give such a descriptive account of 'Esav than Ya'aqob? Why are the children of 'Esav synonymous with "Hellen/Greeks" in the book of Maccabees? Why?
PoorKnow 3 years ago
If Cham was "black," why are we to assume that his brothers, Shem and Yepheth weren't? Or his parents, for that matter? Was Cham "black," Shem, "white" and Yepheth "in between?" Can this be proven? Now, Cham had four sons. Kuwsh, Mitsrayim, Puwt and Kena'an. In this case, Kena'an was cursed, not the others. Are we to believe, then, that every "black" person is descended from this one son? The children of Kuwsh, Mitsrayim and Puwt no longer exist? This would have to be the case, would it not?
PoorKnow 3 years ago
Great points and good questions.
Torahrevival 3 years ago
@PoorKnow go read enoch book
MegaVladimir1988 9 months ago
@PoorKnow To my understanding, Ham was not black, but his son Cush was ("black face") = father of the Ethiopians. The other sons were not black, nor were the Canaanites. The curse is not related to blackness, but to servlitude; brought up/on by Canaan's disrespect. And it did come to pass - not "because" of him, but it was an opportunity to disclose the prophecy. When the Israelites inherited Canaan they were to utterly drive out/kill the inhabitants. They didn't & had to put them to tribute.
aydyar08 8 months ago
@PoorKnow not ethiopians!!!
Abrahamketto415 2 months ago
For the record, this "curse" became fulfilled when Yisra'el began occupying the land of Kena'an. This "curse" had nothing, at all, to do with the hue of any person, or nation. If anything, most people, during this period were, probably, somewhat dark in appearance, which had nothing to do with climate or location. Consider the Eskimos, who've been inhabiting the most northern regions of North America for quite some time. Shalowm, 'Ach.
PoorKnow 3 years ago
Thanks!
Torahrevival 3 years ago
@Torahrevival
Ham`s decendents the cannaties inhabit present day lebanon. It has nothing to do with black people. It was a Jewish curse on the people of Lebanon because they wanted their land.
SirHappyThe1st 11 months ago
@SirHappyThe o children of israel are ye not like the children of ethiopea unto me? o children of israelwhat are ethiopean?? black skinned..moses turned white and leprous for speaking against moses's wife..for her to turn white she must have been as dark as moses..they describe christs color as being like that of burned brass, thats dark if u ask me, so whose that cracker wit bloc hair n blue eyes in every church in america?
lyfe1zruff 11 months ago
Comment removed
SirHappyThe1st 10 months ago
It seems that the "prophetic" downfall of the black race and other so called inferior races is down to the will of its own people who still refuse to wake up from its un-concious state.
Just because of a deep in-grained belief in a / the creator does not mean you cannot question the authority of any authors writings?
Please do not take offense / offence as none is intented.
rebirthze 3 years ago
please tell me what bible version you are using i like the layout of that bible please tell me what version and where i can get a copy of it please send me the link when you respond i would greatly appreciate it thankyou
adamanto2007 3 years ago
Canaan is serving the nations too as mostly MERCHANTS and MANUFACTURERS, BUT are as well serving various tribes of Israel, even in our lowly state.
Two more videos to look at:
This first one is somewhat humorous, YouTu search for "CNN: Outsourcing the Bible to China" and "Made in China". Does it make sense who has the highest probablity of being from Canaan?
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
Cross reference: Gen. 11:10-26; Generations from Shem to Abram.
I need to clarify that I didn't write that Canaan has been oppressed to this day. I wrote that Canaan has been serving his brethren to this day. Yephet through serving the euro-economic system of capitalism/consumerism (english is the world language of business) and Shem through carry-outs and American black hair care, both big businesses in the 'hood. I'll prove it all with one video.
YouTu Search: "Black Hair: Korean Takeover"
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
I wasn't consciously aware of it at first, but this video corresponds and sufficiently fulfills the prophecy of the divine curses as a sign and wonder of disobedience in Yisrael NOT keeping the Laws of YHWH.
Read: Deuteronomy 28:43
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
Thanks for the reference. Do you think that "Black" Americans are Canaanites then?
Torahrevival 3 years ago
Did you do the youtube search and watched the video? The answer should CLICK after watching the video.
The plight of black americans, Shem, is different from that of Canaan. The scions of Shem through Yacov/12 tribes suppose to be serving YHWH, but when we aren't serving Him properly in obedience, we end up serving nations YHWH sends against us; servants of YHWH or servants of who YHWH sends against us...
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
Canaan's scions were prophecsized to be servant of servants. The Divine Order of YHWH on earth suppose to place Israel as the head and all of the other brethren serving them (Cham and Yapeth); read Deu 28:1,12-13. But we haven't gotten back to YHWH in obedience yet, so we have been brought low; read Deu 28:43-44. The prophecy says servant OF SERVANTS. The tribes are serving vile nations, because they are not serving YHWH.
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
and they forgot the Lord who had created them in the earth; and the inhabitants of the earth made unto themselves, at that time, every man his god; gods of wood and stone which could neither speak, hear, nor deliver, and the sons of men served them and they became their gods."
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
Something to consider is how did Noah know who did this and what was done to him (blood somewhere)? Perhaps this isn't the first time Canaan has done something like this. This would be shameful to Cham, so I understand why he would perhaps tell his brothers and maybe go to seek out his son as well. If Cham did something wrong, HE would have been cursed.
Canaan was the culprit, but some english bibles interprets/translates Gen 9:24 differently.
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
Some bibles read 'younger' or 'youngest'. It couldn't have been his technical youngest son, Yepeth, because it wouldn't make sense to prophecy a curse of Canaan. What has been forgotten is a old Yiree tradition of staying with the Grandfather for a time to learn the laws/path to YHWH; they are taught and treated like sons. Abram learned this from his Grand-great-forefather Shem (ref: Book of Jasher/Book of the Upright Record).
Servant of Servants is the main idea of this prophecy of Noah.
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
The descendents of Canaan serve the (Shemitic)Yisraeleem today in their captivity, especially in America. Canaan's children have even served Yepeth's descendents today through manufacturing goods to even forsaking their own heritage and language to completely assimilate to achieve more of the Capitalistic/"Ameri-European Dream". Has Canaan ever ruled over a people without serving at least one or two of his brethren?
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
Something else must be clarified (many different off-translations). Gen 9:27.
In the Hebrew Interlinear Bible the main idea is that Canaan would serve his brethren, most notably Yepeth and Shem. Yepeth would (be deceived/deceptively [ פתה(pathah) Strong's Concord. #06601)] dwell in the tabernacle of Shem.
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
Great comments man. Todah! What is the reference in Yasher?
Also, you said the Canaanites have been oppressed by Yaphet to this day. Who do you think the Canaanites are today?
Torahrevival 3 years ago
Yasher 9:5-6 ~ "5 And when Abram came out from the cave, he went to Noah and his son Shem, and he remained with them to learn the instruction of the Lord and his ways, and no man knew where Abram was, and Abram served Noah and Shem his son for a long time.
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
6 And Abram was in Noah's house thirty-nine years, and Abram knew the Lord from three years old, and he went in the ways of the Lord until the day of his death, as Noah and his son Shem had taught him; and all the sons of the earth in those days greatly transgressed against the Lord, and they rebelled against him and they served other gods,
Duskyruddybrownshemi 3 years ago
2 comments
Under what authority is NOAH given the right to curse anyone?
Why would Canaan, an innocent be cursed.
The whole story is propaganda to justify the conquest and domination of the so-called Canaanites. It was written AFTER the conquest and not before. It is like me in 2008 predicting the germans would be defeated in 1945 because Hitler snubbed Jesse Owens. It's not prophecy. It's injecting propaganda into history.
easmachine 3 years ago
Yahweh Blessed Ham, his brothers and Noah. Noah can't curse after Yahweh blessed. Canaan was the 4th son of Ham. why the 4th son ? find out what happened in the tent and you'll know why the 4th son.
ASHRAUD 3 years ago
The Curse of Ham-Khem-Horus is a big lie.
meak911 3 years ago
Quran 5:116
And behold! Allah will say(On Judgment Day): "O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah.?" He will say: "Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, thou wouldst indeed have known it. Thou knowest what is in my heart, Thou I know not what is in Thine. For Thou knowest in full all that is hidden."
VAboi123 3 years ago
I don't get it. On your page you say there is only One God, and that Yeshua is not God.
But then you speak in the name of Jesus, which is breaking the first Commandment. Your basically saying he is God.
Your not supposed to speak in any ones name except God
VAboi123 3 years ago
To speak in the Messiah's name does not mean I think he is the Almighty. It just means that I am speaking as a follower of him. It means I recognise his athority over me. It's like a subject of a king who speaks int he name of a king.
Hope that clears that up.
Torahrevival 3 years ago
Gen 9:25 And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; A SERVANT OF SERVANTS shall he be unto his brethren.
Canaan Ham' fourth son became a nation of Merchantlike Tradein [Tyre] hence A SERVANT of SERVANTRY thus becoming today A SERGEANT [Government] Of The Servantlike [Citizens] shall he [this governance] be unto his brethren [fellow citizens]
The Merchants have been making merchandise of men thus Yeshua expelled this curse from HIS FATHERS HOUSE and today within OUR MEMBERS expel such enemies of YHVH
Lockmanship 3 years ago
It fits rather than the church's explanations/ conceptions.
12CIFOM 3 years ago