I'm not a scientist, but I am assuming that he left the top section in tact because it is the force of the weight of this section that 'evidently' caused every floor of these buildings to collapse right to the ground.
This series of videos are obviously just showing how scientifically pathetic the official version really is.
Yes, it's a simulation of a 1D crush-down, using a rigid (indestructable) cap section, which accrues mass as it 'falls'. Various parameters are available to define energy expenditures. This example is simply to show camera tracking features of the simulator, so should not be used as a statement of relative descent rates.
Please visit
the911forum. freeforums. org/wtccs-spreadsheet-crush-down-model-t159. html
I'm not a scientist, but I am assuming that he left the top section in tact because it is the force of the weight of this section that 'evidently' caused every floor of these buildings to collapse right to the ground.
This series of videos are obviously just showing how scientifically pathetic the official version really is.
Interesting stuff!
ipsofacto297 2 years ago
Yes, it's a simulation of a 1D crush-down, using a rigid (indestructable) cap section, which accrues mass as it 'falls'. Various parameters are available to define energy expenditures. This example is simply to show camera tracking features of the simulator, so should not be used as a statement of relative descent rates.
Please visit
the911forum. freeforums. org/wtccs-spreadsheet-crush-down-model-t159. html
femr2 2 years ago
why the hell do we need the impression that the top section stays intact after such a fall?
gunthaarz 2 years ago
awesome!!
bushdidit2u911 2 years ago
wow!!!!
5*****stars
probinsontx 2 years ago