Bobby Orr is the greatest Hockey Player of all time. End of Story! If anyone disagrees then they are a fanboy of some other player and don't deserve to call themself a hockey fan.
Hasek was a much better goalie than Roy. Hasek had 5 season in which he saved 93% or better (the only goalie to do it more than once). roy never did it.
Gretzky was the best forward
Orr the best D (I argue the best player ever but thats me)
@Forsure3333 Plante was their main goalie. He got hurt in game 1 then Ernie Wakely their third best goalie was chosen to finish game one and played all of game 2. Glenn Hall one of the greatest of all time played in games 3 and 4 in Boston. For some reason that I have yet to figure out he only played on the road.
He revolutionized the game more then any player. Gretzky may be the greatest but nobody changed the game more then the Super Kid... number 4, Bobby Orr.
@Slipknot5301 Gretzky revolutionized the game with the European style no doubt. What I said was Orr did it first being the first rushing defenseman who was also the best player of his era. 1967-1975. And this is from the Hockey News not me. Around 1989, 1990 they voted his 1969-70 season the best single season of all time for how it changed the game. That's from them not me so I think they know the game more then you and me. Look it up if you don't believe me.
Genius there were two divisions then. The west had all expansion teams until the Black Hawks were switched over beg. in 1970-71. The Bruins beat a good Rangers team in 6 games and a great Black Hawks team in 4 straight. The Blues had a record like 37-26-13 or something like that. Not a bad team by then.The Bruins tied with the Black Hawks for first but the Hawks were awarded first place on the basis of most wins. Beating them in 4 straight was more impressive then St. Louis obviously.
Duh. No kidding. I'm 47 and I was living it then in Chicago. Not sure how "great" Chicago was by going down in a sweep. Same thing that plagued Chicago in the '70 playoffs kept them from beating Montreal in '71 - too many great stars, not enough great team players. Boston & Montreal coalesced separate, star components into two great teams. During the first 3 expansion seasons St. Louis was merely best-of-the worst, with senior citizens Hall and Plante standing on their heads.
"Ok so what team was better that year??? Or the year after that, and the year after that?" - jaytf123
Any team in the Wales Conference could kick any team in the Campbell Conference for the reason you just stated. Beating St. Louis, Minnesota, California, L.A., Pittsburgh or Philadelphia was no big deal. All the power was in the Wales. Not until Flyers won it in '74 did the '67 expansion teams gain major respect.
Like I tried to tell you there was no Wales or Campbell then. It was eastern and western conference then. By 70-71they did inner conference seeding. But the point is the Bruins won the Cup on the path that the league dictated. They beat the Black Hawks in four straight and proved they were the best.team in the league.
Wales Trophy went to top East team, Campbell Trophy to top West team. Same difference. Point is that the West was an expansion conference from '67-'68 to '70-'71, & only marginally better when Chicago joined (prompted by Buffalo & Vancouver added to East that same season). Beating an East team for the '70 Cup would have been a more realistic assessment of the Bruins power - not running roughshod over the 7th best team in the NHL, which is essentially what any "top" team in the West was then.
THEY did beat the Black Hawks an eastern team in 4 straight in the conf finals. So your saying if they had beaten the BlacK Hawks in the finals that would have mad them a better team? You make no sense. Question again? Who was the best team from 70 to 72?? The Bruins did choke to Dryden and the Habs in 71 after the best record in the history. Do you hate Bobby Orr?? Like them or not they were one of the best teams of that era. So the Habs of 68 and 69 Cups are tainted because they beat theBlues?
The "finals" essentially WERE the Boston-Chicago series. Had Chicago got past Boston they, also, would have decimated St. Louis. Then what would THAT have proven? That the two, best teams in the league - Boston & Chicago - each could dominate a third-year expansion team? Yeah, I guess that's about it. Boston may have been the most powerful team in the NHL from '69-'72, but they didn't prove it by trouncing Jean-Guy Talbot and Frank St. Marseille!
@shotsave Boston DID prove they were the best of that era by sweeping Chicago that year, the victory over St Louis was just a "formality" I agree. But Bruins missed chance to be regarded as one of the best teams ever because they could not put away the inferior Habs in '69 and incredibly in '71 blowing a 5-1 lead in game two of their series. They should have won 4 Cups in a row.
Coincidentally, I just read an account from a great hockey history group I joined on Yahoo years ago. A member recalled an interview Ed Westfall gave describing how, in the middle of the 1971-72 season, the Bruins gathered after a game at a local bar and literally decided that they WANTED TO WIN THE CUP THAT SPRING. Nothing to do with coaching or front office influence. They just simply decided amongst themselves that it was time to win another cup. And they did.
@shotsave Well that's interesting what Westfall said but I saw a recent gathering of Bruin greats on NESN network New England with Cheevers, Orr, Bucyk, Park, Neely, and Cheevers said the "71 meltdown in game 2 vs Canadiens eventually led to the team questioning the commitment to winning on the part of some Bruins and the ultimate departure of key players due to this to the newly formed WHA in 1972. Maybe the "decision to win" in 1972 was their last hurrah.
Most of the qualified accounts I've read all agree that Montreal didn't win that series - Boston lost it. Dryden played okay, but was not spectacular (until maybe the Finals against Chicago). Westfall's comments were contained in a thread that detailed rumors that Sinden and Johnson were terrible coaches, and that the success Boston had in the late 60s thru mid 70s was attributable to the players, not the coaching staff.
@shotsave Yeah, Dryden would have been NO factor but for game two debacle in '71. Steve Brunt in his book "Searching for Bobby Orr" speculates also that Orr's knee was bothering him at the time and his erractic play in that series also hurt. Certainly the players are #1 factor in a team's success, however i disagree about Sinden, he kept hard partying Bruins in line, Johnson did not.
@shotsave Just a note on the Blackhawks of that era. Although I was Bruin fan you couldn't help but like the Hawks they had great players, the Hulls, Mikita, Martin, Pappin, Esposito, and B. Hull was a great guy, got his autograph at '71 All Star game in Boston. I think they had more all stars in that game than the Bruins.
My love of hockey was born in 1969-70, and my young heart broken in the 1971 Finals. It was an awesome collection of talent, but allegedly couldn't come together as a team in '71. Without the elder Hull, they worked hard to get back to the finals in '73 but, again, Montreal - this time led by the Roadrunner Cournoyer - bested Chicago in six games. Made it to my first game in '72, second balcony of the old Stadium. They beat Toronto 4-0. Espo with the shutout.
@shotsave Yep, I was with 'ya bro, Canadiens broke a lot of hearts in Chicago and Boston at that time. they were like the Celtics of the '60s, always found a way to win championships even against superior teams.
Is the Islanders great team of 82 tainted because they beat a crappy Canucks team. Same with the Rangers in 94. They beat a lousy Canucks team in the finals. FYI the Blues had the sixth best record in 70 the Maple Leafs had a losing record that year. If you had said the Bruins basically won the Cup when they beat the Black Hawks in the Conf finals OK that would have made more sense.
Islander Dynasty was in motion even prior to the first cup in '80. Vancouver had spirited goaltending from Brodeur and no lack of spirit from Snepts & Tiger, but that was all. Bouncing the Darth Vader-nucks was merely part of the process, not the pinnacle moment. Keenan-led Blueshirts surprised no one by winning one-and-done in '94. Their age and rental players weren't going to sustain Stanley success beyond '94 - regardless of the opponent. P.R. & hype were the Smythe winners that Spring.
@jaytf123 Your not being fair. Islanders did win 4 Cups in a row, the last one being against a relatively weak Canucks team, but so what you can't choose your opponent, and Vancouver was very competitive in '94 Final vs Rangers.
@Slipknot5301 Who gives a flying fuck about Gretzky! The guy was a douche bag. Bobby Orr was a pioneer. Bobby was doing stuff that Gretzky wished he could do. And I think many Bruins' fans will disagree with your statement. And Bobby has a statue built in his honor outside the TD GARDEN, BITCH! Does Gretzky have a statue? I think NOT!!!!
@Slipknot5301 Gretzky was a pussy when it came to getting physical. Plus, If you messed with Orr, You got his teammates to fuck your shit up. In a fight, Orr would've knocked Gretzky's lights out! And granted the only reason Gretzky has all those records is because he played longer. Orr was more physical, and his body couldn't handled all the abuse with the style he played.
bobby orr is my idol !!! i have a singed boston bruins bobby orr jersey !!! but a the end, bobby orr should be taking the stanley cup but he broke his leg in his score !!!
@Gam3rKidd Bobby Orr was on the Leaf radar screen back in the day, but they fucked up and let Boston woo him, they have been paying the price ever since, eat your heart out Leaf fans with Phil Kessel!
@ImKoolWithThis Goaltender is such a terribly skewed position when it comes to using stats (wins, G.A.A.) to determine who's best, Dominik Hasek blows Roy away in every stat that doesn't involve number of games played, or the influence of how well your team in front of you plays, or how good they were.
Dominik Hasek is the best goalie ever, but North American bias reigns again.
what'd you record this with? a 1970's videocamera?
supahcanfly 3 months ago
@supahcanfly nah a potato
CTanner94 1 month ago
I watched it live, and each time I watch it after that it still brings tears.
Jimed756 4 months ago
Bobby Orr is the greatest Hockey Player of all time. End of Story! If anyone disagrees then they are a fanboy of some other player and don't deserve to call themself a hockey fan.
ProTuner06 8 months ago
the best defense men to play
getacluecluelessblue 11 months ago
BEST GOALTENDER:Terry Sawchuck
BEST DEFENSMEN: Paul Coffee
BEST OFFENSE:Steve Yzerman
schrome1019 1 year ago
@schrome1019
Fanboy Bullshit!
Fanboy Bullshit!
Fanboy Bullshit!
ProTuner06 8 months ago
Number 4 Bobby Orr!!!!
wwehbkfan75 1 year ago
@googleingking best forward: gretzky
best goalie: roy
Slipknot5301 1 year ago
Hasek was a much better goalie than Roy. Hasek had 5 season in which he saved 93% or better (the only goalie to do it more than once). roy never did it.
Gretzky was the best forward
Orr the best D (I argue the best player ever but thats me)
fuzzygoblinwizard 1 year ago
Why did the Blues make Jacques Plante play? He had very good stats that year.
Forsure3333 1 year ago
@Forsure3333 Plante was their main goalie. He got hurt in game 1 then Ernie Wakely their third best goalie was chosen to finish game one and played all of game 2. Glenn Hall one of the greatest of all time played in games 3 and 4 in Boston. For some reason that I have yet to figure out he only played on the road.
jaytf123 1 year ago
kane's goal is way better than this junk
wildguy108 1 year ago
@444serifovic He was tripped. Watch closer.
greendaylover12345 1 year ago
i dont understand why he jumped so high after the goal. he looked fuckin ridiculous.
444serifovic 1 year ago
corrextion, best goali: Martin Brodeaur
Asinc308 1 year ago
@Asinc308 Not after that game at the Olympics.
CaptainAsian27 1 year ago
Bobby Orr number four
Tubbydude127 1 year ago
He revolutionized the game more then any player. Gretzky may be the greatest but nobody changed the game more then the Super Kid... number 4, Bobby Orr.
jaytf123 2 years ago
@jaytf123 lol gretzky expanded the fucking game moron
Slipknot5301 1 year ago
@Slipknot5301 Gretzky revolutionized the game with the European style no doubt. What I said was Orr did it first being the first rushing defenseman who was also the best player of his era. 1967-1975. And this is from the Hockey News not me. Around 1989, 1990 they voted his 1969-70 season the best single season of all time for how it changed the game. That's from them not me so I think they know the game more then you and me. Look it up if you don't believe me.
jaytf123 1 year ago
@shotsave dude this is history this is probably better then you can score or if you play goalie than you can save
hockeylou14 2 years ago
Yep, it was really tough beating an EXPANSION team.
In four games.
Yeah, a real BATTLE.
Not.
shotsave 2 years ago
Genius there were two divisions then. The west had all expansion teams until the Black Hawks were switched over beg. in 1970-71. The Bruins beat a good Rangers team in 6 games and a great Black Hawks team in 4 straight. The Blues had a record like 37-26-13 or something like that. Not a bad team by then.The Bruins tied with the Black Hawks for first but the Hawks were awarded first place on the basis of most wins. Beating them in 4 straight was more impressive then St. Louis obviously.
jaytf123 2 years ago
Duh. No kidding. I'm 47 and I was living it then in Chicago. Not sure how "great" Chicago was by going down in a sweep. Same thing that plagued Chicago in the '70 playoffs kept them from beating Montreal in '71 - too many great stars, not enough great team players. Boston & Montreal coalesced separate, star components into two great teams. During the first 3 expansion seasons St. Louis was merely best-of-the worst, with senior citizens Hall and Plante standing on their heads.
shotsave 2 years ago
"Ok so what team was better that year??? Or the year after that, and the year after that?" - jaytf123
Any team in the Wales Conference could kick any team in the Campbell Conference for the reason you just stated. Beating St. Louis, Minnesota, California, L.A., Pittsburgh or Philadelphia was no big deal. All the power was in the Wales. Not until Flyers won it in '74 did the '67 expansion teams gain major respect.
shotsave 2 years ago
Like I tried to tell you there was no Wales or Campbell then. It was eastern and western conference then. By 70-71they did inner conference seeding. But the point is the Bruins won the Cup on the path that the league dictated. They beat the Black Hawks in four straight and proved they were the best.team in the league.
jaytf123 2 years ago
Wales Trophy went to top East team, Campbell Trophy to top West team. Same difference. Point is that the West was an expansion conference from '67-'68 to '70-'71, & only marginally better when Chicago joined (prompted by Buffalo & Vancouver added to East that same season). Beating an East team for the '70 Cup would have been a more realistic assessment of the Bruins power - not running roughshod over the 7th best team in the NHL, which is essentially what any "top" team in the West was then.
shotsave 2 years ago
THEY did beat the Black Hawks an eastern team in 4 straight in the conf finals. So your saying if they had beaten the BlacK Hawks in the finals that would have mad them a better team? You make no sense. Question again? Who was the best team from 70 to 72?? The Bruins did choke to Dryden and the Habs in 71 after the best record in the history. Do you hate Bobby Orr?? Like them or not they were one of the best teams of that era. So the Habs of 68 and 69 Cups are tainted because they beat theBlues?
jaytf123 2 years ago
The "finals" essentially WERE the Boston-Chicago series. Had Chicago got past Boston they, also, would have decimated St. Louis. Then what would THAT have proven? That the two, best teams in the league - Boston & Chicago - each could dominate a third-year expansion team? Yeah, I guess that's about it. Boston may have been the most powerful team in the NHL from '69-'72, but they didn't prove it by trouncing Jean-Guy Talbot and Frank St. Marseille!
shotsave 2 years ago
@shotsave Boston DID prove they were the best of that era by sweeping Chicago that year, the victory over St Louis was just a "formality" I agree. But Bruins missed chance to be regarded as one of the best teams ever because they could not put away the inferior Habs in '69 and incredibly in '71 blowing a 5-1 lead in game two of their series. They should have won 4 Cups in a row.
DonQwantsyou 1 year ago
[@DonQwantsyou]
Coincidentally, I just read an account from a great hockey history group I joined on Yahoo years ago. A member recalled an interview Ed Westfall gave describing how, in the middle of the 1971-72 season, the Bruins gathered after a game at a local bar and literally decided that they WANTED TO WIN THE CUP THAT SPRING. Nothing to do with coaching or front office influence. They just simply decided amongst themselves that it was time to win another cup. And they did.
shotsave 1 year ago
@shotsave Well that's interesting what Westfall said but I saw a recent gathering of Bruin greats on NESN network New England with Cheevers, Orr, Bucyk, Park, Neely, and Cheevers said the "71 meltdown in game 2 vs Canadiens eventually led to the team questioning the commitment to winning on the part of some Bruins and the ultimate departure of key players due to this to the newly formed WHA in 1972. Maybe the "decision to win" in 1972 was their last hurrah.
DonQwantsyou 1 year ago
@DonQwantsyou
Most of the qualified accounts I've read all agree that Montreal didn't win that series - Boston lost it. Dryden played okay, but was not spectacular (until maybe the Finals against Chicago). Westfall's comments were contained in a thread that detailed rumors that Sinden and Johnson were terrible coaches, and that the success Boston had in the late 60s thru mid 70s was attributable to the players, not the coaching staff.
shotsave 1 year ago
@shotsave Yeah, Dryden would have been NO factor but for game two debacle in '71. Steve Brunt in his book "Searching for Bobby Orr" speculates also that Orr's knee was bothering him at the time and his erractic play in that series also hurt. Certainly the players are #1 factor in a team's success, however i disagree about Sinden, he kept hard partying Bruins in line, Johnson did not.
DonQwantsyou 1 year ago
@shotsave Just a note on the Blackhawks of that era. Although I was Bruin fan you couldn't help but like the Hawks they had great players, the Hulls, Mikita, Martin, Pappin, Esposito, and B. Hull was a great guy, got his autograph at '71 All Star game in Boston. I think they had more all stars in that game than the Bruins.
DonQwantsyou 1 year ago
@DonQwantsyou
My love of hockey was born in 1969-70, and my young heart broken in the 1971 Finals. It was an awesome collection of talent, but allegedly couldn't come together as a team in '71. Without the elder Hull, they worked hard to get back to the finals in '73 but, again, Montreal - this time led by the Roadrunner Cournoyer - bested Chicago in six games. Made it to my first game in '72, second balcony of the old Stadium. They beat Toronto 4-0. Espo with the shutout.
shotsave 1 year ago
@shotsave Yep, I was with 'ya bro, Canadiens broke a lot of hearts in Chicago and Boston at that time. they were like the Celtics of the '60s, always found a way to win championships even against superior teams.
DonQwantsyou 1 year ago
Is the Islanders great team of 82 tainted because they beat a crappy Canucks team. Same with the Rangers in 94. They beat a lousy Canucks team in the finals. FYI the Blues had the sixth best record in 70 the Maple Leafs had a losing record that year. If you had said the Bruins basically won the Cup when they beat the Black Hawks in the Conf finals OK that would have made more sense.
jaytf123 2 years ago
Islander Dynasty was in motion even prior to the first cup in '80. Vancouver had spirited goaltending from Brodeur and no lack of spirit from Snepts & Tiger, but that was all. Bouncing the Darth Vader-nucks was merely part of the process, not the pinnacle moment. Keenan-led Blueshirts surprised no one by winning one-and-done in '94. Their age and rental players weren't going to sustain Stanley success beyond '94 - regardless of the opponent. P.R. & hype were the Smythe winners that Spring.
shotsave 2 years ago
@jaytf123 Your not being fair. Islanders did win 4 Cups in a row, the last one being against a relatively weak Canucks team, but so what you can't choose your opponent, and Vancouver was very competitive in '94 Final vs Rangers.
DonQwantsyou 1 year ago
Comment removed
jaytf123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OK so what team was better then the Bruins that year? Or the year after that, and the year after that?
jaytf123 2 years ago
Bobby Orr Is The Best (Including Lemuix And Malkin).
TheJunoman123 2 years ago
GO MALKIN
RLewisH 2 years ago
@TheJunoman123 I'll agree with you on Mario Lemuiex, but not Malkin.
DKfan87 1 year ago
The Greatest Hockey player EVER!! Bobby Orr is 3x bettah than Gretzky ever was. Bobby Orr is the Brett Hart of Hockey!
DKfan87 2 years ago
@DKfan87 llol that's why gretzky holds 60 league records. and wwe is gay
Slipknot5301 1 year ago
@Slipknot5301 Who gives a flying fuck about Gretzky! The guy was a douche bag. Bobby Orr was a pioneer. Bobby was doing stuff that Gretzky wished he could do. And I think many Bruins' fans will disagree with your statement. And Bobby has a statue built in his honor outside the TD GARDEN, BITCH! Does Gretzky have a statue? I think NOT!!!!
DKfan87 1 year ago
@DKfan87 that's exactly why gretzky has 60 league records and orr has 1
nice try tho :)
Slipknot5301 1 year ago
@Slipknot5301 He's still a fucking Douche bag.
DKfan87 1 year ago
@DKfan87 He's still the best player of all time
Slipknot5301 1 year ago
@Slipknot5301 Gretzky was a pussy when it came to getting physical. Plus, If you messed with Orr, You got his teammates to fuck your shit up. In a fight, Orr would've knocked Gretzky's lights out! And granted the only reason Gretzky has all those records is because he played longer. Orr was more physical, and his body couldn't handled all the abuse with the style he played.
DKfan87 1 year ago
@DKfan87 lol gretzky was a pussy
orr would knock his lights out if they got in a scrum
whats your point?
Slipknot5301 1 year ago
Score! Bobby Orr!
iamsirpat 2 years ago
I love him greatest goal in hockey history
hockeylovers1619 2 years ago
After Paul Henderson's in Summit Series of course...
Tamerplane 2 years ago
so thats how it goes watch the monkey brothers
hockeylovers1619 2 years ago
0:16 classic!
philipkaka 2 years ago
bobby orr is my idol !!! i have a singed boston bruins bobby orr jersey !!! but a the end, bobby orr should be taking the stanley cup but he broke his leg in his score !!!
TonyHawkFan7 2 years ago
he should of did that with his dick and it would of gone in still
Sundin456 2 years ago
yeah, no one will ever get anyone like bobby orr. as far as im concerned, he was oneof a kind haha. GO BRUINS GO!!
Tovitox 3 years ago 9
100% agreed
sakicjr19123 2 years ago
Toronto will never get anyone like bobby orr
thehaloguyorman 3 years ago
sadly....
PunkRockerPRO 2 years ago
i wish a player like bobby orr could be on teh leafs :P
Gam3rKidd 3 years ago
keep wishing
stoomooo 3 years ago 2
@Gam3rKidd Bobby Orr was on the Leaf radar screen back in the day, but they fucked up and let Boston woo him, they have been paying the price ever since, eat your heart out Leaf fans with Phil Kessel!
DonQwantsyou 1 year ago
Superman!!! Scored the goal while he was in the air!!! Insane
LemieuxNHL66 3 years ago
.... he wasnt in the air untill after he scored
FuhQ21 3 years ago 2
Amazing goal <3
SpidersTickleMePink 3 years ago
ha i had a goal just like that yesterday.. obioulsy nit that good or cool lookin but iut was still nice
culverslad 3 years ago
This is the sound that we heard in our household when growing up. Orr is awesome! And I am not a hockey fan. My daddy is!
H3c0m1ngs0on 3 years ago
okay i am cory orr bobbys son and i was at that game my dad let me get in there picture o what memories
itschazkenny 3 years ago
how the F**** can you be bobby orr's son if your 18 wannabe
Ovechkin1712 3 years ago
You've got problems dude, get 'em fixed.
PointThree 3 years ago
Well, let us think about this for a moment...
You posted this entry just recently and you're 18 years old. Orr scored the goal on May 10, 1970...
Go back to school looser!
TorontoTrouble 2 years ago
You commented on youtube and you're 34 years old You tube was released in 2005...
Get back to work looser!
DouglasEdward84 2 years ago
AWESOME!!!!!!!
HockeyIsTheBest5 3 years ago 2
bestfowar phil espizito
best defence bobby orr
best goalie pete peaters
hockeylou14 3 years ago
Best Froward:Wayne Gretzky
Best Defense:Bobby Orr
Best Goalie:Patrick Roy
ImKoolWithThis 3 years ago 17
@ImKoolWithThis although it may be bobby orr I am definitely more fond on Brian Leetch (although it has to do with the fact i am a ranger fan)
mregoproductions 1 year ago
@mregoproductions naw man Leetch is the best USA def
ImKoolWithThis 1 year ago
@ImKoolWithThis No
Forward is Gordie howe
D is Orr
G is Terry Sawchuk
BTW ITS MY OPINION
MrElwood6 1 year ago
@ImKoolWithThis beyond like. love this. so incredibly true
hockey90 1 year ago
@ImKoolWithThis Best goalie Terry Sawchuck
goblew14 1 year ago
@ImKoolWithThis Roy sucked, he was a bitch.
TheNikolai6969 1 year ago
@TheNikolai6969 he sucked? he ahd 2 cups and 551 wins bitch
Slipknot5301 1 year ago
@Slipknot5301 cool story bro
TheNikolai6969 1 year ago
@ImKoolWithThis Goaltender is such a terribly skewed position when it comes to using stats (wins, G.A.A.) to determine who's best, Dominik Hasek blows Roy away in every stat that doesn't involve number of games played, or the influence of how well your team in front of you plays, or how good they were.
Dominik Hasek is the best goalie ever, but North American bias reigns again.
JDJAKS 1 year ago
@ImKoolWithThis
Marty, Marty, Marty son
BnJelactan 1 year ago
thats awsome. my dad has that picture autographed, it was an awsome goal
sakicjr19123 3 years ago 2
i remember that great day everybody was excited thanks for posting brought great memories.
deckforce2 3 years ago 2
Bruins win !!!!!!!!!!!!!
hockeyplaya4life20 3 years ago
Best Goal Ever
Best Player Ever
Best Team Ever
GO BRUINS
BOSTONFAN8134 3 years ago 2
BEST PLAYER EVER!!
foxboy1 3 years ago
bobby orre the bast playings houckey all right yes
rogergilles 4 years ago
amazing
elder189 4 years ago