Added: 3 years ago
From: MilitaryChannel
Views: 193,684
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,146)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • John Garand was born Canadian but was raised in America and was a naturalized citizen way before he designed the M1. Also, the pinging thing was not a real disadvantage in a firefight.

  • The m1 does make a ping because i have one, but the ping comes so fast after the shot its hard to hear.

  • Boy, they should REALLY have made it clear that John Garand was an American weapons engineer who was born in Canada and moved the the US as a young child and went to school and became a firearms developer and inventor...that way all these misinformed kids wouldnt assume the M1 was made by the Canadians or it was somehow a Canadian rifle.

  • 1:02 fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap...

  • Our germans technicians developed lots of awesome war machinery! But sending out our soldiers equipped with a K98 into a "modern war" against a Garand or a russian PPSH... it was so poor! Rest in peace mates!!

    Greets from germany

  • @derernsti remember the germans had the StG44 and the ruskies could abrley afford Ammo for their own troops

    in stalingard 5 men were sent into combat

    1 witht eh rifle and the other 4 carried ammo

    you picked up wepaons from the dead

  • @alekzander2010 The STG44 entered service in late 1944 or early 1945. Stalingrad was from from 1941 to 1943. And no, the Russians had many weapons, like the PpSh 41, which was one of the most mass-produced submachine guns of all time.

  • @Litterboxer529 actually the MP43 (its the STG/MP44 with a diffrent name)

    entered service in Octobor 43

    i have a book about the STG44 but it was OFFICALLY issued in june 44

    (hitler wasnt happy to know it was issued without his permission)

  • american legend ... yeay right lol

  • @fryskomuttens Yup! gotta love it

  • Designed by CANADIAN

  • @alekzander2010 So?...

  • @alekzander2010 Every American is decended or is from, another country, just like Garand

  • 8 rounds semi automatic also can be as good as a 10 rounds bolt action also or maybe better...

  • @iiisoposol2020 it is better actually, for speed in shooting, and reloading with 1 clip, instead of 2, also because of automatic clip ejection, bolt opening and magazine clearing.

  • The fact that the M1 garand made the *ping* sound also saved some soldiers their lives.

    When you heard the that sound you knew you had to get cover. with The M1 carbine for example you never knew then to take cover.

  • @M1LS572 I guess it works both ways...some were lucky with the ping others perhaps not.

  • 14 people dont have 8 rounds at their fingertips.

  • i'm making a replica airsoft version, all parts will be the same, wish my luck by liking this status =)

  • The greatest American rifle was designed by a Canadian. Interesting, that.

  • @chas63 Some of the Greatest things American made are made by immigrants, hell, America itself is made by immigrants....oh and Garand was an American citizen since he was 7 years old when he moved to the US

  • @LoneWolf051 He's Canadian

  • @DoctorNambu Yep, lived in Canada for 7 years, and spend 80 years in the US, and all his education and knowledge and skills came from American education..Canada has nothing at all to brag about, except the hospital where he was born at.

  • @LoneWolf051 It took his Canadian brain to make the legend though...

  • @DoctorNambu Yeah, and thats what America is founded on, and what makes it great, the best minds from all over the world...John Garand is a classic definition of an American icon

  • @LoneWolf051 Who is Canadian....

  • @DoctorNambu Every American is of a foriegn decent. Thats the essence of being American

  • @LoneWolf051 Yet there is still a lot of racism though....

  • @DoctorNambu Just human nature I guess

  • @LoneWolf051 so what about people (like me) that have family from Europe and native Americans?

  • @USSWISCONSIN64 same like me, I'm Irish, and Cherokee Indian

  • @LoneWolf051 my mom told me what part is indian but i don't remember. but i am mostly Finnish. :)

  • i dont get it it was designed by a canadian but why do they call it an american gun

  • @29yoface Because 'American' isn't really a race save for Native Americans. We're comprised of a bunch of different races; we just happen to all be living/born/raised in the USA. For instance, I'm of Asian descent but I was born in the USA, therefore I am Asian-American. You could call me Asian, or you could call me American. Either way works.

  • @NumPad im asian too but canadian instead of american

  • @29yoface I personally think its because the US Army were the ones that adopted it.

  • @29yoface It's very simple really. John Garand moved to Connecticut. when he was a very young child. He got all his experience in the United States. He designed it in the United States, and for the US military so it's an American gun.

  • @esh325 He was born Canadian though how do you know an American had the brains to do what he did (no offense)

  • @DoctorNambu The man was educated in America though. There were many semi automatic rifles designers competing against the Garand, some were agruebally more reliable. The Johnson rifle, for example, actually outperformed the M1 Garand in mud and sand testing.

  • @29yoface if someone is born in the U.S. the person is an American citizen same principle toward the M1, and the inventor moved here and worked on the M1 in an American Armory, using American money, Canada had nothing to do with the project.

  • The weapon that killed Jaws. Lol

  • @wow5883 Haha yes. M1 Garand + Oxygen tank is a deadly combination.

  • I never understood why they have the M14 and M1 on the list when they are made basically from the same design. Better having hte M1 on the list.

  • @nightfireivey They are very similar, but not exactly the same. The M14 is slightly lighter and shorter then the M1 Garand. The M14 is fully automatic and semi automatic where the M1 Garand is only semi automatic. The M14 uses a detachable 20 round magazine where the M1 Garand has a fixed magazine that is fed with a 8 round en bloc clip. The M14 uses a short stroke piston gas system where the M1 Garand uses longs stroke piston gas system. The M1 Garand fires 7.62x63 where the M14 fires 7.62x51.

  • @esh325 Thanks for that info. The M14 is a good weapon no doubt but I dont think it should of made that list.

  • @esh325 Doesnt the Garand Fire Thirty Aught Six?[30-06.]

  • @ItEaChUsTuNtS 7.62x63 is the same exact thing as 30/06, just in metric.

  • so was buddy just born in canada and he lived in the states?

  • 14 people are communists

  • 1:01 whacking off really fast huh xD wtf here come the egg head!!! 1:04

  • lol canadian ahhhh im happy

  • damn good gun!, but they didn't put Mosin Nagant, SVT-40 and Gewehr43

  • @auvar100 Theres a reason for that ya know

  • YES CANADIAN RIFLE

  • @dinison6 Canada? no, the M-1 was "born" in Springfield Massachussetts ;)

  • @LoneWolf051 yes but it was designed by a Canadian engineer

  • @dinison6 He was 7 when he became an American, that would mean he would have to had been working for the Canadian military and had been a licenced weapons engineer before the age of 7.

  • @LoneWolf051 he is somewhat canadian

  • @dinison6 Yes, somewhat, somewhat like 7 years Canadian, 80 years American

  • @dinison6 You're wrong...sorry.

  • Comment removed

  • Even in the virtual battlefield of Call of Duty, performance of this rifle is spectacular. I love it. I wish I could get my hands on these babies.

  • country of origin : united states FALSE

    it Canadian

  • @alexpower15 Springfield Armory is in Canada? wow, I always thought it was in Massachussetts.

  • @LoneWolf051 he the m-1 get buy bye springfield armory but originally it was created in canada

  • @alexpower15 The M-1 rifle was invented in the Springfield Armory in 1923 by an employee named John Garand. Canada had nothing to do with it.

  • @LoneWolf051 It was 'Officially' invented in the US by a Canadian. So there you go.

  • @royalcityman Yeah, a former Canadian, but the rifle itself was all American made.

  • Comment removed

  • @LoneWolf051 I looked into it. He became a US citizen when he was 32. Apparently there was no 'Dual Citizenship' status in those days. As far as I'm concerned, that's just the paperwork. I'm still waving my flag :)

  • @royalcityman Tru, but the rifle was born in Massachussetts, thus American

  • @alexpower15 no dumb ass it was made in america by an american citizen, yes john cantius garand was an american citizen

  • Comment removed

  • 0:45... "the rifle that won world war 2"... Sorry that was the Mosin Nagant

  • @Fishfins Actually, in real life, no single rifle won the war to be "the rifle that won the war" it would need to have fought in EVERY theater, and be used by EVERY ALLIED nation as a standard service rifle. No single rifle won the war...mass production won the war. The M-1 was the most effective and advanced service rifle of the war, but it didnt "win" the war, neither did the Mosin Nagant, or any other service rifle.

  • @Fishfins This documentary is so full of shit it isnt even funny, they say the "ping" was a "dreaded flaw" and everyone died from it, which is complete BS, since its such a tiny little sound in battle, and a single ping means 1 man is out, not the whole squad, platoon, ect. Then they say John Garand was a Canadian engineer, which is also BS, he was an AMERICAN engineer, with an American education. They also said the Enfield bolt action rifle has a faster fire rate than modern assault rifles!!

  • @TheGarnest You are a little queer. This dialogue is over. Go have sex with your mother.

  • @TheGarnest Hey little snotnose punk- I am a combat veteran of three wars. You are an idiot. You know nothing, so you shut up. Real men have tried and failed to shut me up. A little punk like you would piss his pants if he ever faced me in person.

  • Press "like" if you love all guns :D

  • @STL308 Well you do realise theres no "like" button on youtube, right?

  • @ThisGuyThe52nd Threre should be ;)

  • @ThisGuyThe52nd Threre should be ;)

  • Comment removed

  • at 1:03 it looks like his fapping the rifle. LOL

  • it pisses me off when americans say they won the war themselves, they didn't you had british, polish, french, greeks, etc. same with guns, lee-enfield, mosin nagant, the list is endless

  • @joc69uk32 I agree, its annoying as hell, now the M-1 may have been the best service rifle of the war, but saying "we won the war with this rifle" is a pretty stupid thing to say..........and I'm Ameican myself.

  • @LoneWolf051 yeah, ruchard venola was pretty dumb to say it was the rifle that won the war. other countries didn't use it!

  • @joc69uk32 *richard

  • @joc69uk32 People like that, ya just have to ignore, life's too short to waste on them.

  • @LoneWolf051 lol

  • The "ping" myth is bullshit, and it destroys the credibility of the filmmakers that they put this military version of an urban myth out there. Soldiers do not operate alone. Everyone's rifle does not empty at the same time. Even if you could hear the "ping" of the ejected clip, pop up, and his buddy will shoot you. Use some common sense, folks. I am a combat veteran, and I can tell you that the noise on the battlefield is load and confusing. The M-1 was the best rifle of WW2, period.

  • @snakemanmike what about any other battle rifles of the era? like the mosin-nagant, the mas 36, or the lee enfield? i can understand that a soldier in the field forms a tight bond with his weapon, but really all the battle rifles of that era were great, and many people argee with this fact, just throwing that out there

  • The loudest sound on a battle field is a trigger pulled on an empty chamber.

  • service length kiss my ass...

  • M1 is good, but KAR98b is Much Better or the SVT40 EVEN DA MP34 UND MP40 ARE BETTER!!!

  • @rolinjet Yes, I'd much rather have a 5-shot, bolt-action rifle over an eight-shot, semi-automatic rifle, and would ESPECIALLY love submachine guns with an effective range of 50-100 meters over a rifle with an effective range of 400+m with a lot of stopping power, usually only requiring one round.

  • @ChrisHun7er Of course now we have assault rifles and carbines, but back then a Garand would be one of the best weapons to carry. It would be nice to have a Thompson at the closest ranges, but you didn't exactly get that close too often in WWII.

  • @RedSandStudios Except in Europe, with its small hamlets, farms, towns, villages and cities. Or the Pacific, on those tiny islands, and close range jungle fights.

  • @ChrisHun7er Kar98b, even if is a bolt-action riffle, its accurancy and range is too high, perfect long-distance battle, M1 used on automatic and urban Combats (we must to remember that many combats of WWII were on Villages and Citys) MP Series Were pretty good, in thats aspect, are better. And everybody knows that Semi-automatic has les accurancy than bolt Action, how every, Germany had the Best Weaponary in that time!

  • @rolinjet LOL, not in reality, its actually the complete opposite, and no SMGs are not better at 500 yards.

  • @LoneWolf051 Yes, you said it, ACTUALLY, at times of WWII, many combats used to be a short ranges, cause the mission of America were push out the Wehrmacht from occupied Citys, and why weaponary is it much better, by Many Reason, The effective of Wehrmacht was 1 to 5, so The Casualitys by Germany used to be 80% less than Allies, in the France Front, but, they lost only by reasons of Numbers, The Allies were too much for them, so russia kicked they asses! but they had the best weaponary

  • @rolinjet Yeah well best tanks at least, but then again that depends on what you classify as better, or overly designed and impractical.

  • garand kinda looks like that guy from willy wonka.

  • the Ak was designed to hit a five inch group at 100 meters.. it uses an underpowered cartridge and is pretty much a weapon that is good for 250 meters.. the M1 is accurate up to 600 yards with iron sights and a good operator the 3006 is a thousand meter cartridge.. according to my Bro in law.. paratrooper in Korea. when ever the clip ejected it was a signal for every chinese in the neighborhood to jump and fire.. the big problem with the m1 was not being able to top off the mag.

  • @Justinbilings You can top off an M1, I do it all the time. And why would the Chinese commit suicide by running into enemy firing squads because of 1 man out of 50 running out?

  • aiming, aiming. fire! PAF!!! a damn mist. :O germans spotted me. DEAD!

  • The whole thing about the ping is overblown. First of all, on the battlefield, the overall noise is so loud, and everything is so chaotic that a single pinging sound would hardly be noticed. Second, soldiers fight as a unit.. What are the odds that everyone's rifle would be empty at the same time? When your rifle ejects that clip, odds are that you will have 5-10 fellow squad members who have loaded rifles and are still firing. The old ping story is likely a military urban myth, IMHO.

  • @snakemanmike Anyone who says "oh the ping sound got so many soldiers killed, its a fatal flaw" is a tell tale sign that they have no idea what combat is like. I do combat reenactments, and that sound is completely drowned out, all you see is the clip pops out, with no sound. The very instant the clip ejects, is the same instant the gunshot is heard, so the clip ejecting is impossible to hear, you can only hear it when it hits the ground, however if you're on dirt or grass, it makes no sound.

  • @snakemanmike actually soldiers would use spent m1 garand clips and bang them against rocks. the enemy would pop up and get his head blown off. this technique actually was used to pretty good effect

  • @mrmastercheif7 Until they caught on to it, then US troops began throwing the clips OVER the german positions, in close range fights, to make them think theres Americans BEHIND them or on their flanks...psychological torture, hehe.

  • @LoneWolf051 lol right you are sir!

  • @snakemanmike in close quarters combat, the pinging sound can be heard easily, even with all the gunfire. And when you're empty, you'll probably be dead when your squadmates notice there was some stealthy guy waiting for the ping

  • @pedrod9basket And its easy to kill anyone with a bolt action rifle, just shoot him in between his cycling time.

  • @LoneWolf051 I'm talking about Japanese killing Americans when they're empty, not vice versa

  • @pedrod9basket Yeah that happened on some occasions in extreme close combat (clearing pillboxes, houses, ect), but was only restricted to extreme close range, and had to be on hard surfaces, so it could actually be heard, but it wasnt nearly as common as the US troops using the bolt action cycle time against the enemy, which was very common and used at all ranges.

  • @LoneWolf051 A trained soldier does not stand in the open when cycling or reloading. Not an easy kill, soldiers arnt stupid.

  • @HuErigerable When he ducks back behind cover to cycle the bolt, you aim where he's going to pop back up, then when he does to take another shot, you get him.

  • When your empty, your covered.

  • @HuErigerable not ALWAYS when you think about it. The japs and krauts are damn smart as well

  • @pedrod9basket the krauts yes, the japs where just crazy.

  • @snakemanmike not every waking moment of WWII had deafening explosions going off. Open plains with small German patrols in those little towns could have been quite enough to hear the ping sound.

  • @snakemanmike what is the old ping story?

  • @TheWhole9Yards1001 That the ping sound when the clip was ejected got people killed, because the enemy know that your rifle was empty. Total bullshit.

  • @snakemanmike whell i t makes sense doesnt it? the ping gives away enemy posittion right?

  • @TheWhole9Yards1001 Yeah, its an old romantic hollywood myth about the tiny little metallic pinging sound the clip makes after it ejects from the rifle getting everyone killed because the enemy magically heard it, in reality its impossible to hear outside of a few feet. It was never a problem in battle, except when clearing houses and buildings, where the enemy was very close range, but even then, they usually used that sound to make a break and run away when you were reloading.

  • @snakemanmike Of course, on an open battlefield, the PINGing sound is irrelevant, lost in the noise of the fight. But in urban house to house fighting, god knows that happenned A LOT, when opponents are in the same storey or house, or other small scale fighting, I'm pretty sure the pinging sound is a bit more of a factor.

  • @snakemanmike single airborne soldiers ?

  • @snakemanmike I know right, when was the last time you saw a soldier fighting by himself

  • @snakemanmike I think everyone should remeber the Discovery channel blabber mouth Morons here are also staying total crap about other firearms, just look at these morons talking about the hunk of Russian crap AK 47 that does jam it has a nasty habbit of blowing up and its so inaccurate that a 12 guage loaded with 00 Buck shot shoots same patterns at the AK !

    These Discovery jerk wads are only trying to make ratings for the Disovery channel !

  • @Moldovawineimporter And dont forget the shit about the Lee Enfield having a faster rate fo fire than "most modern automatic weapons"

    Or how the M-1 Garand's "Ping" sound was heard by "everybody and their brother",yeah,go into battle with an M-1, THEN you'll see how stupid that comment was. Or how John Garand was a "Canadian engineer", yet he came to the US when he was 7 years old! so IF he was a Canadain engineer, he would have to had been a licenced engineer in Canada BEFORE the age of 7!!!!!

  • @LoneWolf051 What are your blabbering about ?

    You must have smoken some serious crack and Meth together !

  • @Moldovawineimporter LOL, no, I have standards. I was pointing out the things this documentary says.

  • @LoneWolf051 Yep you must have standards alright you only smoke more expencive dope and you play the best of Russian war video games that teach you everything you ever learned about firearms .

    You can always tell the biggest jackass on you tube videos if they have Russian war video games on their Channel information .

  • @Moldovawineimporter "Russian war" video games? no, nothing like that on my channel. Your accusation information is invalid, please try again

  • @LoneWolf051 Oh really, I just looked at your channel and there they are Russian video war games !

    Looks like you are a full blown You Tube liar like so many punk on these forums .

  • @Moldovawineimporter I see no Russian war games on my profile. Just Brothers in Arms.

  • @LoneWolf051 Your a crack head thats been smoken so much meth and crack you can't see strait !

  • @Moldovawineimporter Oh, I get it now...Sir Trollsalot

  • this.is.my.most.favorite.gun.e­ver.invented.BING!! thumbs up if u get it

  • if you got shot in the chest from that would you die from 1 bullet?

  • @jordan3727 You'd die instantly, probably not even feel it.

  • @jordan3727 oh yes. such a powerful round is instant death.

  • @supergodzillaman2 Dont hink the enemy was that stupid as to stick there heads up while there was a firing line of Americans shooting at them.

  • the mosin nagant won the war

  • @FrankieJames7 To win the war it would have to see action on all fronts, in all theaters, combat all axis forces,and be used in all Allied hands. No rifle won the war, in fact no single anything won the war, it was mass production that won it.

  • God I wish I had one lol I love M1 Garands

  • 0:55

    Kind of an awkward camera-shot...

  • number 4? WTF

    NUMBER 1!

  • @112ALONE NO WAY OUR SOVIET AK-47 IS THE BEST BUT YOU AMERICANS ARE JELOUS BECOSE YOU CANT MAKE GUN BETTER THAN AK-47 ITS SO OLD BUT YOU CANT MAKE ANYTHING BETTER. CCCP ЕТО СИЛА !

  • @Latviansoldier well... the M1 has

    the power

    the accuracy

    the range

    and while the AK has full auto.. it isnt as powerful, not as accurate. the m1 is also very durable.

    and we CAN make something better, my friend and i are designing an assault rifle firing a 50 cal short round, which will have recoil like a 9mm, but the power of a full 50.

    its all a matter of opinion i think. personally, i am an excellent shot with my M1, so i would always choose that over anything else.

  • @112ALONE Ohhh are you idiot ? AK-47 is accurat in my hands,in my fathers hands , well mayby you just dont now how to shoot and ak-47 and ak-47 is powerful and can shoot through rails and anothers stuff and if you dont now things about ak-47 then dont say anything you dont know anything about CCCP.

  • @Latviansoldier No matter how skilled you or your father are, the AK-47 and it's variants are NOT anywhere close to the M1 Garand's accuracy past 300 yards and the M1 Garand is still more accurate within 300 yards, as it has a better cartridge, a longer barrel, better rifling, and really better everything regarding accuracy and precision.

  • @ChrisHun7er Now thats why we have our awesome SVD SKS SVT you just cant make bettter guns okay you can throw them everywhere and they will work.

  • @Latviansoldier from what i have seen, you can throw an M1basically anywhere, and itl still work. not saying that you cant do the same with your sks rifles, i am just stating a fact.

  • @112ALONE Well we can throw our guns everywhere and they will work and you have more details soo it means longer cleaning. P.S CMON its Russia our guns are the best.

  • @Latviansoldier Just the Ak

  • @LoneWolf051 Just the garand .

  • @Latviansoldier ...and BAR, and Thompson, and M-14, and Wichester, and Colt 1911, and the Browning High Power, and the Springfield, and the M1919, and the Browning Auto 5, and the Peacemaker, and the Henry, and the Kentucky rifle, and Browning M2, and the Gatling gun, and the Brown Bess and M1 Carbine, and Barrett, and Mini gun, and the Grease Gun, and the Spencer, and the M-60, and the Kriss.

  • @LoneWolf051 You know what i dont gonn write any thing becose i know that Russian guns are better and one AK-47 is better than all your guns.

  • @Latviansoldier HAHAHAHA, you think the AK is better than every single western weapon?. Typical uneducated, opinionated, ignorant Russian response, no wonder that country is in a state of extreme poverty and mass decay, with a horrible, brainwashed education system.

    IN REALITY, the AK is really not better than anything, its cheap, easy to make, and has good reliability, then again most 21st century western guns have the same reliability as the AK.

  • @LoneWolf051 You are laughting now but when theres gonna be some cind of war or something i gonn laught with my friends and comrades we will se which guns gonna win you just dont know how to shoot ak-47 and thats why we made AKM its better than ak-47 and then we made AK-74 . P.S Russian weapons are the best Russian tanks,pistols ,and another stuff.

  • @Latviansoldier ....we have alien technology.

  • @LoneWolf051 OMG YOU ARE SOOOOO DUMB DRUNK RUSSIAN MAN ADDICTED TO VODKA IS SMARTER THAN YOU.

  • @Latviansoldier .....*facepalm*

  • @LoneWolf051 Thats right FACEPALM YOU ARE SOOOOO DUMB !!!!!!!! YOU GET DRUNK FROM ONE SIP OF BEER !!!!!

  • @Latviansoldier ACTUALLY, the M1 cleans pretty well. for me anyway. theres 3 main parts: the trigger assembly, the buttstock, and the barrel and reciever assembly. they all separate in a matter of .3 seconds, and clean quite easily. unless of course, you want to go the full 100 yds and decide to take the op rod off, and the gas tube assembly. then it takes a bit longer. but for a basic cleaning, its quite simple.

    can we agree that both rifles are good in the hands of a skilled user? i think so.

  • @112ALONE Well now you speak like normal guy but still ak is better.

  • @ChrisHun7er ahh, finally someone who agrees with me. thank you, sir. 

  • @Latviansoldier im not an idiot. maybe you are a good shot with an AK. but i am a good shot with an M1, which, can also shoot through many things as well, being that it uses a larger round. and im not saying that im a genius and that i know everything there is to know about CCCP.

    do you know everything about the M1? maybe, maybe not.

    like i said, in my opinion, i prefer the M1 over the AK. can we settle this here like civilized people? you can have you AK-47, and i will have my M1.

  • @tavjas not quite, the mosin was not the only weapon available to the red army. You must also remember, while the USSR did tear the guts out from the nazi war machine, they lost 28 MILLION men in the process, almost an entire generation, gone!

    This amount of casualties and such was mostly due to Stalin becoming paranoid and executing most of his good generals. (remember the winter war? yeah.. that's what happens too)

    The USSR would have run out of bodies to throw at the enemy eventually.

  • if the first time you pick up a weapon from the mud and it fires first time, and again, then it's a great weapon....except for the "ping"

  • @iltidsn the ping can also be used to an advantage fire then throw the clip when he sticks his head up bang

  • i have a question any1 can answer this, who won the vietnam or usa?

  • bang, bang, bang, bang, bang, bang, bang, bang TING!