See that picture of a Boeing 757 at the 4:16 mark that ISN'T the plane that hit the tower. See those big tits on the underbelly. How can you have pictures of a 757 that shows there's a big bulge in the exact same spot that you're trying to tell me there shouldn't be a big bulge?????????? That like showing the same picture and saying the sky isn't fucking BLUE!!!!
The pod is a cloaking device. Captain James T. Kirk was kind enough to lend his off of the USS Enterprise. Little did he know it'd be the last time he'd ever see it.
Someone needs to investigate whether these particular "commercial flights" were even holding passengers, let alone EXISTED at the time of the 9/11 attacks. Some fishy bull shit going on. 9/11 is either one giant fucking lie or a heap ton of bull shit on top of the truth.
Is it me or are all the planes images of black or gray blobs with no writing? I havent seen one CLEAR zoom in on an American Airlines plane lol.....Wtf more is there to show that this was 99.9% an insibe job.
@thatsmynamebud1 You would have to ask the Mossad agents who were detained and released back to Israel for those photos and video. After all, they did admit they were sent there that day to "document the event" on Israeli television.
How can a plane disappear into a building? 3/4 floors are totally crushed. How can an airplane rip open a concrete floor? How can the tip of the wing even enter the building?
Why use real planes if most heroific americans will tell the story, along with the lie?
(i bet that all the eyewitnesses of the wtc can not even be sure it wasnt a plane... You can not expect a bomb to go off either)
The planes are fake and the extra equipment is to distract you from looking at the plane itself!
If it was a missile I would expect to see bigger and more powerful explosion. All I see is the plane crushing thru the building and jet fuel igniting.
e-8 jstars was the military aircraft that crash into south tower. There is no way an commercial aircraft can carry a missiles. The E-8 JSTARS is an electronic aircraft.
If I was going to all this trouble of killing people , destroying buildings and wanted everyone to think it was a terrorist planned attack. I'd have made sure the planes I was using were perfect in everyway to remove any doubts about who was responsible which from this video is clearly not the case. Believe what you want to believe.
@woolcroft Well, if you compare the amount of people who believe 9/11 was as the news stations portrayed to the amount of people who disagree and question the incidents that took place that day, it is clear that the majority would much easier believe in a terrorist attack than an inside planned attack. So, even if the planes had "NOT TERRORISTS" painted on the side and there were pictures that showed George Bush flying one of them, people would still rather believe the more believable version.
I know what that flash is. You see when you make large bomb like 5 tons you can not ignite it with match, you need smaller bomb so called booster. Yes, large explosions are staged. You can even hear it as ka(5g)-bo(5kg)-boom(5tons). So we see middle second stage of detonation of large bomb, most likely it is loaded in plane.
The funny thing is that grown educated men are actually in this video! Look, what are you saying, "Someone with expert timing pushed a button in the building or on the plane that detonated a bomb AT A NANO-SECOND BEFORE CRASHING?" Do they hear themselves. And think, if a bomb was in the building it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for the Muslim pilot or anyone to pick exactly the right floor to crash into under duress at at any speed. It's reflection, angle, illusion, shutter speed, camera shake, etc
This object would have to be installed in flight...The landing gear would not be able to retract after takeoff or be lowered for landing...This is fake.
Who ever said they planned to land it? It's not fake! I was photographed numerous times from different angles and the "pod" is sitting just to the right of centre, i.e. inside of the landing gear housing so take off would of been possible
right at 3:25 that is not electricity conducting. it is off center and to the right. definitely not the nose colliding with the building because it is off center and doesnt even match with the nose of the plane it also makes an explosion of dust when it enters the building. you can see the two puffs coming from the engines on either side but then there is one in the middle?? why would there be one in the middle? what would need to be underneath the plane to make that kind of dust puff??
And who the fuck sits on a bench in the middle of NYC setting the cam to shoot at the WTC And :-O right at that second, very day, month year a plane just happens to ram into the building, what bullshit they fill peoples heads with. the footage was shoot for CG integration, the building was loaded with explosives, very carefully so it would collapse like that, and the people in the planes where taken somewhere else and killed, plane was taken apart and recycled.
===================✈ No wake turbulance? How many plane parts were recovered at the WTC site? Bet you can count them all on your fingers and toes. In every collision there is an equal and opposite force reaction. The same force the plane delivered to blast a huge hole in the building should be delivered equally to the plane, in quantity and time. The plane fails to truncate from the EQUAL force. No velocity loss? No energy used. Its called conservation, you cant fake it. You have been fooled.
Here it goes. Families mourned loved ones thought to be on flight 175. Am I to believe that these families were part of a plot to fool the world that the plane was remotely controlled by the Government? The flash could have been electrical in nature. The plane most likely hit a main power line on that side of the building. The extra equipment? most of the images are blurred so I cannot conclusively comment. TGKR
@TheGospelKnightRider If you can't conclusively comment on the extra attachment because it is "Blurred" then you must be fucking blind, because most of the photos are not blurred.
@TheJuggaloPride I do not normally respond to dummies that that use such language. Figure out why so many people on this site are not sure or speaking conclusively as to what is seen under the fuselage.
@finessedesign1 If the government can bring down the towers and not care about life, what happened to the planes is up for an investigation just like the towers falling.
the govt. had to know the jetfuel would blowup and burn.in ww2 we had planes of the same size and fuel to hit the empier state building and it didnt bring it down.
No there wasn't they wouldn't have memorial or talk 175 in a tragic way of they thought there was something attach to it or it wasn't a commerical airlines quit defending Wat these fucks did people like defend these cowords
@1822jh The truth is the truth and something is definitely attached to the bottom of that plane. Maybe this will open up the investigation of what happened to the real flights because it's obvious that was not a Commercial Flight.
If something was attached to the bottom of the plane, how did the landing gear work? Why didn't the ground crew see it? Most importantly, why put anything on the bottom of the plane when you have TONS of room in the cargo bay for anything it could conceivably carry?
@RetSquid Do you get it?? The planes were not what they were claimed to be. If you need to understand this, view Operation Northwood where the government planned to kill it's own citizens for the purpose of having a war with Cuba. They planned to use DRONE planes for their mission. In that Missiion, CIA agents posed as College Students were to be the victims but they weren't on the drone.
@RetSquid Lastly I can see that attachment at the body with my eyes and the notion it doesnt exist is absurd considering all the people in this video see it too and they took their footage from CNN.
All of yall shut the fuck up I hate yall therories on this shit we all saw wat happen no bomb it was plane that blew up cause it struck the tower Fuckin idiots just want attiction
@1822jh But it's obvious there is something attached to the bottom of that "plane" or whatever it was and it shouldn't have been there at all. Yes we do see it that piece underneath that plane and this would no be under a commercial flight.
Hey assholes! Try comparing a the bottom of a United 767 to the photos of the bottom of United 175. You'll see, if you're honest, that there are no "pods" or "external equipment." it's simply the way Unbited aircraft are painted.
HOW CAN I PLANE WHO IST BUILD ONLY ON ALUMINIUM,GO ALL THE WAY TRTUH A STEEL STRKTURE?? IF U WANNA GO TRHUGH STEEL YOU MUS HAVE SOMETHING THAT IS HEAVIER AND STRONGER THAN STEEL,LIKE URAN938,,OR OR WOLFRAM,,also u need 3 times 1000 km fast to break trhu steeel structure,,
wtc was build that no plane can fly into,,theplane would falling down without entering,,lol,,,don belave that bullshit
Actually it was a Boeing 767 however it doeschave a flare around the landing gear but not in the fuselage itself. I showed it to a long time Boeing supervisor and she freaked when she saw it! First thought she had was it must be photo shopped... it wasn't. How much proof do the 911truth movement need? This is more proof then Kennedy's head moving backwards from the grassy knoll... hello!!!
I think the bottome part of the plane that was being talked about must have been some sort of cargo holding area, and if is possible, couldn't it be a "recycled" plane?
I'm surprise no one comments that in every single video of the plane hitting the WTC, the plane is completely grey. There are NONE of the typical markings indicating it is a commerical United or American airline.
The Shills/Trolls/Disinfo (S.T.Ds) on here are under total control from their Handlers/Orderers/Masters/Owners (H.O.M.Os). Basically the HOMOs spread their STDs to try and infect free speech about 9/11 and stop people from spreading the truth, about 9/11 begging ppl to shut up, i wont do it, its so obvious and blatant, yet another false flag slaughtering 3000 innocent ppl, its disgusting, and the perps will burn in hell for it!
you guys don't get it this was set up with a primer charge on the nose to go off on impact to set off the 1200lbs of termite in the outside containers to aid the jet fuel to melt the steel beams
Why are they using a different company plane with different paint? There is nothing out of place on the belly of that plane. In fact, this video show it.
BTW, you can also see the wings the whole time. Might wanna go let the guys in the 'disappearing wings' section know. They claim the wings disappear as it gets to the building showing that the planes were animation and not really there. LMAO
BTW, you can also the the wings the whole time. Might wanna go let the guys know that who say there were no planes at all. They claim the wings disappear as it gets to ghe building. LMAO
Again. NONE of that is substantiated. A guy on YouTube rambling. AND btw contradicting other 'Truther' accounts. Of all the 'Legitimate' theories and 'proofs' out there NONE of them have solid foundation and MOST of them contradict one another. It's stupid to believe. I've covered this from the beggining. It's morphed to accomodate the debunking proof. And so the debunkers just said screw it. Not doing the round robin waste of time. But here .........
you should watch the new video of the security cam above the floor it hit. it is a plane. cant see the under side. but there's also another one i dont know if it real but it shows a female pilot before impact. which terrorist wouldn't use women to do there work in there religion it would result in there version of hell.
I'm not a conspiracy theorists but yeah I found this really ,really odd. Each Jet Liner was a huge guide missile loaded with thermite ready to explode on a timed detonator or a wireless detonator.It sucks what happened to those people that were trapped in the building and the fire fighters that were trying to rescue them.And what ever hit the Pentagon did not match the crash impact either.And if people witnessed the 2 nd jet said it had no windows and it was grey in color.
@Drakon6956 there is no missle pod look for a video thats called debunking 9/11 anyways in it it shows the pics of the plane and he shows u ones he took of the same plane type and same paint job its just the paint and shadows making look like theres a pod. the reason the trade center fell was termite explosive placed along the main supports of the building. there is lots of proof of thermite in the free fall videos
@KeepHimAtBay shadows of the plane. a plane cast a shadow, and any side that dosnt have light hitting it will have shadow. so the sun is above the plane. thus a shadow under the plane
@KeepHimAtBay noo the explosive's placed along the main support beams did maybe all im saying is it was a real plane with no missle. if u wonder why there is a flame when the nose touchs then research kenetic energy and watch recordings of plane crash test the nose will cause a explosion from kinectic energy, just like how a bullet makes a spark on impact of the nose
@Cronotfalcon these were drone planes.. pod was atached.. be couse the pod left a MARK... a clear MARK... on teh fasade... fuck the pictures.. the mark on the fasde clearly tells there was something under planes
The missil shape attachment i think its load with termite that can generate 2700F that can melt metal frame of the tower, jet fuel can only reach 1700F
The free fall of the #7 building like NO resistant, this is the two most evidence, also pantagon plane the reackage engine height only 3 and haf feet where the fireman stand by next to it.
@energyalt56 Are you retarded, go look at a picture of the plane hitting the pentagon, its clearly a GIANT fucking hole. And plus when a skin thin aluminum airplane hits a MILITARY reinforced concrete structure of course its not gonna leave a perfect plane shaped hole. Fucking duh, it's called common sense!
the ALQAEDA dont have the intelligence to set up this attack , itś impossible alqaeda do this with no help. the alqaeda its a scapegoat . CIA , and other organizations and the most powerful people in the world are involved, THE FEAR IS POWER AND CONTROL . BUT I DONT HAVE PROOFS , NOBODY IS GONE NO WHAT REALLY HAPPENS ITS A FACT .
dose any body think there was a bomb on the airplane! iv watch every think on the 9/11 and cant see there would be any bomb being there.. em em still breath taking though when i watch this just no heart this people had to to this i think they have gone to hell not heaven!
I like how the video gets more likes then dislikes but the past day or so of comments is all against this...and they all are apparently experts on planes O.o
If the government was sooo smart that they managed to keep this all a giant secret, and btw HUNDREDS of ppl would need to be involved in this kinda op. Why the fuck didnt they just use a normal airliner jet? I promise you someone would have thought of this. Clearly not an iside job, its called a fucking PAINT JOB! Google it, the paint job on the UA 787 has that EXACT bump on the fuselage.
@zelenko2 Yes, i'm saying that it was NOT planted by Bush or anyone for that matter. I'm an aerospace engineer and I was part of the plant management on the 767 and I can promise you that that bump is NORMAL for that aircraft, it's where we house the landing gear. All UA 767's had it.
DAMNZ... they all just talk about the craziest theories .. but never EVER bring any kind of real fact.. Sometimes they have a nice book to sell sometimes some `never seen before`(by millions of people) footage , copied in the worst quality. Where they see the craziest shits.. so crazy .. I mostly need 20 beers to actualy see it.. Its crazy.. get a job you idiots... Do something with your life... Something meaningfull.
I just got to ask. For all of you, obvious low IQ, people believing these photoshop, video/audio mixer, story spinners doing these stupid edited videos how are we ever going to get a credible change to come forward in our gov. if you guys keep lapping this BS up? If I were a nutjob like the ones making these, I'd say the gov. is behind these stupid vids. To keep the 'crazy' label on us. Can't you idiots see that even the makers of these videos are laughing at you.
How about comparing them to the typical paint job of a United Air Lines jet? And the bulge is nothing more than the area where the landing gear goes. All of those models have these bulges. And study some friggin' science on kinetic energy if you want to know about the flash. All of this is nothing more than typical truther b.s. Even if you show them the science, they just scream coverup. Makes me ill.
@cajtri87 "How about comparing them to the typical paint job of a United Air Lines jet?" You mean you expect them to debunk their own twisted theory? Good luck with that. I used to work three blocks from World Trade and it makes me ill too to see that all these years later there are still people out there propagating this crap. More sadly though, there are still people believing it.
There is no "pod" It's obviously a reflection. I am in the air force, too, and I've seen attachments to aircraft before. This is no attachment. Besides, why would the Gov. put it on the outside? That would be the ultimate bonehead move of the century- putting it on the outside for everyone to see. And finally- that is no military aircraft. A five minute google search will reveal that that is, no doubt, a Boeing 767.
In other videos you can actually see the thing on the bottom fire something. Smoke comes from both ends and a orange flash hits the building right in line with the attached object.
WHAT I WANT TO KNOW AND I THINK ITS IMORTANT....WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THE PEOPLE ON THOSE TWO FLIGHTS THAT CRASHED INTO THE TWIN TOWERS SINCE THEY ACTUALLY WERE MILITARY PLANES INSTEAD OF COMMERCIAL PLANES...WERE THE PASSENGERS TAKEN SOMEPLACE AND MURDERED BECAUSE NONE OF THEM SHOWED UP AT THERE HJOMES!!!!
@charliedog5258 May be the passengers were just fiction. If I tell you that Danny Jones died how do you know he did or didn't as Danny Jones is not known by any one so who knows if he died or not. The biggest clue though is that the Hijackers are still alive and that is a fact do a search if you want to confirm it.
@galaxything None of the hijackers are alive. All truther crap. Everyone thought to be alive turned out to be a case of mistaken identity, or people with the same names.
@eaglejoe8 lol why lie? Lying just gives a bad name to all "official beilievers" man, there is so much info. It has even been said on the maistream news (what you official believers like to believe so much) that the hijackers are turning up alive and well. And it is not misstaken identity, names, families, places of work, adresses, pass ports all match up. Unless you are saying they are ALL victims of identity theft lol
@galaxything Not all of them, just the ones believed to be alive. None of the 19 hijackers are alive. Saudi Arabia has even acknowledged this as well. Not one single 911 hijacker is alive.
@charliedog5258 maybe I should not have said they were abducted by aliens?Now I have given these conspiracy theorists new ideas.Who knows where they will take this.Stay tuned??
this is such crap, these flights were obviously genuine passenger jets. if andone did any actual research instead of believing this crappy videos, they'd know of the people escaping the buildings, and only realising what hit the towers when all the falling debris out of the sky rained down and worker found paper copys of the flight tickets, as well as itineraries for family holidays and all sorts of personal belongings from the passengers. READ A BOOK, dont stare at a twat on a screen!
a search for pictures of 767 flown by american airlines reveals that the majority of planes are silverish, and just few had a darkblue underbelly which is polished and highly reflective like your bathroom mirror.
Now just tell me how one can confuse a reflection of the streets and buildings on the underbelly can be misinterpreted as to be a 'threedimensional structure' . people saying this are not even considering this to be a reflection.
16 Jewish secret service agents posted as hijackers did not hijack 4 planes, set up by the US government to be remotely flown past target buildings with missile launchers on them as holograms and cruise missiles slammed into buildings loaded with invisible super nanothermite after all the Jews had been evacuated. They then shot down their own 4th plane. Then, the government brainwashed all the witnesses and planted plane debris from different model jets.
So we hired people to fly the plane or remotely controlled (took over) it to fly into the building with a big lump under it? (as if pilots non-complicit in the operation would not notice it a huge thing under it - too risky) The speed, the mass, the fuel, the office combustibles, the massive weight of the above-impact building were not enough? The answer is THEY WERE FAR MORE THAN ENOUGH TIMES TWO. You can go on and on with this conspiratorial crap for a million years....
hmm, the other fool with the "plane had no windows" does not mention this alleged shadow on the plane. the 2 of you should get together and conspire together. as a team, you may almost get somewhere. ...almost.
Do a Google image search for "Boeing 767 underbelly" and see what comes up. Gee, there seems to be an awful lot of 767s flying around with "pods" on them. This video is about as dumb and pathetic as it gets. Come on, people. Go for a hike, go for a bike ride, get outside and do SOMETHING! Stop wasting your lives with this crap.
@zelenko2 i cant elive u still cant see it waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas an insise jobbbbbbbbbbbbbb... americans so stupid... i wish those who belive the goverment... would be in the wtc on 911.. and see the explosions inside and die in knowing it was an inside job... how more painfull can it be than knowing something and not being able to tell...
@zCmDx i believe the so called hijackers were cia assets... they maybe really hijacked the plane and landed somewhere else... the hijacked planes surely werent those who slamedd into wtc 1 and 2
If a President received this type of info he would have freaked out. Bush knew already,this was more of a (sir mission accomplished). A child could decipher this from a video. He totally knew all about it or his reaction would have been hysterical. Don't you think?
IF you know much about aerodynamics, and explosions with this video, the explination is very symple. That flash is white in color and shows no other products.
It is a sonicboom wave, or rather the condensation cloud as the nose of the aircraft punches through the sound waves. A fully loaded airliner at 100% throttle with that much fuel in it can easily break the sound barrier in a dive, which the plane was doing right before it impacted the tower.
@jhenn30 The truth of the matter is that if there wasn't any sort of secondary explosive device located at the site of impact or on the plane itself those towers would still be there today. Jet fuel would not have been able to take down those towers. It's physically impossible. The towers were designed to withstand the impact of planes.
@IgnisFatuusIX The towers might have been designed that way to take the impact but they have done extreme test that have proved that the metal support beam with weights on them with jet fuel burning under them will get soft and twist which happened in the towers and cause them to fall
@zelenko2 look up "steel being weakened by jet fuel" on youtube one video shows that over a couple mins the steel would "soften" to a point of twisting.. which in the towers would cause the floors above to fall... And it may not have been the initial jet fires that did it. but there was fire from the beginning to the end no one can dispute that
Being a flight attendant for United who lost co-workers on this flight, it was UNITED AIRLINES flight 175, and there were no "modifications" to a "Boeing 757" as the aircraft used in the fleet was a Boeing 767. If whoever posted this has a wet dream about a conspiracy theory, get your facts straight.
R.I.P. to the 2,976 American people that lost their lives on 9/11 and R.I.P. to the 48,644 Afghan and 1,690,903 Iraqi people that paid the ultimate price for a crime they did not commit. Oh and the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who experience this everyday. Your 9/11 is their 24/7
@calw2513 bushes first response when he was told that the tower was hit is itself the biggest evidence... im like cmon... he s sitting an half hour there like nothing would have happened...... ??????????????????????????????????...
Dude, it was the fuse that ignited the fuel and explosives! That flash was it starting up then the plane crashes and fuel goes everywhere and ignites with the explosives...
Why no one talks about the onboard breathable oxygen?The 767 Aircraft has its crew oxygen tank on the right hand side in the E+E Compartment offset of the longitudinal axis below the cockpit.
This is only a hint, but oxygen fuels fire as well as flammable liquids....especially when it is stored under high pressure of approx. 1800 psi!
I don't know how much evidence we actually need. I personally think I have seen enough. Two planes banging into buildings one by one. Causing enormous explosion (for a commercial air plane) and caused extreme demolition of the building that simply can't be caused by an airplane alone. Tell me there were explosives attached to plane or detonated in the building,i might agree. Felt so bad for innocent souls who faded to this tragedy. May almighty bring peace to poor souls and coming generations.
COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) is a series of covert, and often illegal[2], projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.
COINTELPRO tactics included discrediting targets through psychological warfare, planting false reports in the media, smearing through forged letters, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, and extralegal violence
Comment removed
tga2848 5 days ago
But they would tell you, that your're just stupid and crazy, if you want to see the truth, no metter how terrible and awful it could be. Cowards !!!
P.S. NO 4 ACTA !
RTE4EVER 5 days ago
This is stupid. The "pod" is the landing gear fairing.
Bloodgod40 1 week ago
@Bloodgod40 YEA RIGHT, A LONG CYLINDRICAL OBJECT CONSTITUTES THE LANDING GEAR. OK.
amandajnmaui 1 day ago
See that picture of a Boeing 757 at the 4:16 mark that ISN'T the plane that hit the tower. See those big tits on the underbelly. How can you have pictures of a 757 that shows there's a big bulge in the exact same spot that you're trying to tell me there shouldn't be a big bulge?????????? That like showing the same picture and saying the sky isn't fucking BLUE!!!!
RichYan33 1 week ago
SOFA KING WE TODD DID.
RichYan33 1 week ago
The pod is a cloaking device. Captain James T. Kirk was kind enough to lend his off of the USS Enterprise. Little did he know it'd be the last time he'd ever see it.
tadpoleposition 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Someone needs to investigate whether these particular "commercial flights" were even holding passengers, let alone EXISTED at the time of the 9/11 attacks. Some fishy bull shit going on. 9/11 is either one giant fucking lie or a heap ton of bull shit on top of the truth.
Rakeization 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Rakeization 3 weeks ago
Is it me or are all the planes images of black or gray blobs with no writing? I havent seen one CLEAR zoom in on an American Airlines plane lol.....Wtf more is there to show that this was 99.9% an insibe job.
thatsmynamebud1 3 weeks ago
@thatsmynamebud1 You would have to ask the Mossad agents who were detained and released back to Israel for those photos and video. After all, they did admit they were sent there that day to "document the event" on Israeli television.
MrBobbyRickySir 23 hours ago
How can a plane disappear into a building? 3/4 floors are totally crushed. How can an airplane rip open a concrete floor? How can the tip of the wing even enter the building?
Why use real planes if most heroific americans will tell the story, along with the lie?
(i bet that all the eyewitnesses of the wtc can not even be sure it wasnt a plane... You can not expect a bomb to go off either)
The planes are fake and the extra equipment is to distract you from looking at the plane itself!
zumobster 3 weeks ago
If it was a missile I would expect to see bigger and more powerful explosion. All I see is the plane crushing thru the building and jet fuel igniting.
Scumbot404 3 weeks ago
The pod was the ignition source for the incendiaries on board both planes.
OperationMockingbird 3 weeks ago
e-8 jstars was the military aircraft that crash into south tower. There is no way an commercial aircraft can carry a missiles. The E-8 JSTARS is an electronic aircraft.
SilentEagles 3 weeks ago
@SilentEagles No, they were prototype Boeing E-10 MC2A [Multi-Sensor Command and Control Aircraft.]
OperationMockingbird 3 weeks ago
bull
foxygran50 4 weeks ago
This is such bullshit. Flight 175 was not remote controlled and did not have any "extra equipment" so they say. Dumbasses.....
trainster100 4 weeks ago
The US government paid Osama millions to go along with this plan.
RootikaLRiDDiM 1 month ago
how come most americans dont do anything abt it?
aliammar07 1 month ago
If I was going to all this trouble of killing people , destroying buildings and wanted everyone to think it was a terrorist planned attack. I'd have made sure the planes I was using were perfect in everyway to remove any doubts about who was responsible which from this video is clearly not the case. Believe what you want to believe.
woolcroft 1 month ago
@woolcroft Well, if you compare the amount of people who believe 9/11 was as the news stations portrayed to the amount of people who disagree and question the incidents that took place that day, it is clear that the majority would much easier believe in a terrorist attack than an inside planned attack. So, even if the planes had "NOT TERRORISTS" painted on the side and there were pictures that showed George Bush flying one of them, people would still rather believe the more believable version.
omgitsbrutalbri 3 weeks ago
@omgitsbrutalbri I think we should be more worried about HAARP
woolcroft 3 weeks ago
I know what that flash is. You see when you make large bomb like 5 tons you can not ignite it with match, you need smaller bomb so called booster. Yes, large explosions are staged. You can even hear it as ka(5g)-bo(5kg)-boom(5tons). So we see middle second stage of detonation of large bomb, most likely it is loaded in plane.
ProzacR 1 month ago
Comment removed
ProzacR 1 month ago
Comment removed
ProzacR 1 month ago
Comment removed
ProzacR 1 month ago
That protrusion was not "extra equipment". It exists on all 767's. Just look at the underside of a United Airlines 767.
PostalCode74 1 month ago
The funny thing is that grown educated men are actually in this video! Look, what are you saying, "Someone with expert timing pushed a button in the building or on the plane that detonated a bomb AT A NANO-SECOND BEFORE CRASHING?" Do they hear themselves. And think, if a bomb was in the building it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for the Muslim pilot or anyone to pick exactly the right floor to crash into under duress at at any speed. It's reflection, angle, illusion, shutter speed, camera shake, etc
videoknife 1 month ago
@videoknife Do you know how precise the technology is now and was in 2001?
Computers can control things at nano-seconds and nanometers. Just look at NASA technologies.
I don't like this too, but will not lie to my self like you do.
KBendix 1 month ago
i think this video has proved to me that it was an inside job.
dudewild 1 month ago
it had no windows fools
deadstil64 1 month ago
no. but anyone with a six figure salary was not present, well most were not
deadstil64 1 month ago
This object would have to be installed in flight...The landing gear would not be able to retract after takeoff or be lowered for landing...This is fake.
JustiinCas3 1 month ago
@JustiinCas3 ,
Who ever said they planned to land it? It's not fake! I was photographed numerous times from different angles and the "pod" is sitting just to the right of centre, i.e. inside of the landing gear housing so take off would of been possible
dobberdoss 1 month ago
This plane melted into the building like butter. That alone tells you something stinks.
WTC7seven 1 month ago
right at 3:25 that is not electricity conducting. it is off center and to the right. definitely not the nose colliding with the building because it is off center and doesnt even match with the nose of the plane it also makes an explosion of dust when it enters the building. you can see the two puffs coming from the engines on either side but then there is one in the middle?? why would there be one in the middle? what would need to be underneath the plane to make that kind of dust puff??
breakinlaptops 1 month ago
And who the fuck sits on a bench in the middle of NYC setting the cam to shoot at the WTC And :-O right at that second, very day, month year a plane just happens to ram into the building, what bullshit they fill peoples heads with. the footage was shoot for CG integration, the building was loaded with explosives, very carefully so it would collapse like that, and the people in the planes where taken somewhere else and killed, plane was taken apart and recycled.
tsunami30003000 2 months ago
A United Airlines 767 is a twin-engine big grey plane.
813jp 2 months ago
===================✈ No wake turbulance? How many plane parts were recovered at the WTC site? Bet you can count them all on your fingers and toes. In every collision there is an equal and opposite force reaction. The same force the plane delivered to blast a huge hole in the building should be delivered equally to the plane, in quantity and time. The plane fails to truncate from the EQUAL force. No velocity loss? No energy used. Its called conservation, you cant fake it. You have been fooled.
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
Here it goes. Families mourned loved ones thought to be on flight 175. Am I to believe that these families were part of a plot to fool the world that the plane was remotely controlled by the Government? The flash could have been electrical in nature. The plane most likely hit a main power line on that side of the building. The extra equipment? most of the images are blurred so I cannot conclusively comment. TGKR
TheGospelKnightRider 2 months ago
@TheGospelKnightRider If you can't conclusively comment on the extra attachment because it is "Blurred" then you must be fucking blind, because most of the photos are not blurred.
TheJuggaloPride 2 months ago
@TheJuggaloPride I do not normally respond to dummies that that use such language. Figure out why so many people on this site are not sure or speaking conclusively as to what is seen under the fuselage.
TheGospelKnightRider 2 months ago
@TheGospelKnightRider They can't name what it is. But they all agree something is there.
TheJuggaloPride 2 months ago
Yes very mysterious! What is the theory on where the original planes went??
finessedesign1 2 months ago
@finessedesign1 If the government can bring down the towers and not care about life, what happened to the planes is up for an investigation just like the towers falling.
WTC7seven 2 months ago
the govt. had to know the jetfuel would blowup and burn.in ww2 we had planes of the same size and fuel to hit the empier state building and it didnt bring it down.
jcb570 3 months ago
Ur brainwashing other people with ur bullshit just like osama bin laden and Hitler
1822jh 3 months ago
No there wasn't they wouldn't have memorial or talk 175 in a tragic way of they thought there was something attach to it or it wasn't a commerical airlines quit defending Wat these fucks did people like defend these cowords
1822jh 3 months ago
Um no so ur sayin it wasn't so their lieing about all victims and everything that was on that flight
1822jh 3 months ago
@1822jh The truth is the truth and something is definitely attached to the bottom of that plane. Maybe this will open up the investigation of what happened to the real flights because it's obvious that was not a Commercial Flight.
WTC7seven 3 months ago
@WTC7seven
If something was attached to the bottom of the plane, how did the landing gear work? Why didn't the ground crew see it? Most importantly, why put anything on the bottom of the plane when you have TONS of room in the cargo bay for anything it could conceivably carry?
What you see is the landing gear 'pods'.
RetSquid 3 months ago
@RetSquid Do you get it?? The planes were not what they were claimed to be. If you need to understand this, view Operation Northwood where the government planned to kill it's own citizens for the purpose of having a war with Cuba. They planned to use DRONE planes for their mission. In that Missiion, CIA agents posed as College Students were to be the victims but they weren't on the drone.
WTC7seven 2 months ago
@WTC7seven
So where are the 'original' planes and all the passengers? How much more complicated do you have to make it?
RetSquid 2 months ago
@RetSquid Lastly I can see that attachment at the body with my eyes and the notion it doesnt exist is absurd considering all the people in this video see it too and they took their footage from CNN.
WTC7seven 2 months ago
@WTC7seven
If you look at similar pictures it is VERY easy to tell that they are the landing gear. Can you explain away anything else I posted?
RetSquid 2 months ago
@RetSquid That's not landing gear and you know it. You see it plain as day that it is not apart of the plane.
WTC7seven 2 months ago
@WTC7seven
That defies logic, if it was not the landing gear, then the landing gear would still be down because it would not be able to be retracted.
All you have to do is look at another 767 in flight to see this.
RetSquid 2 months ago
Comment removed
WTC7seven 2 months ago
All of yall shut the fuck up I hate yall therories on this shit we all saw wat happen no bomb it was plane that blew up cause it struck the tower Fuckin idiots just want attiction
1822jh 3 months ago
@1822jh But it's obvious there is something attached to the bottom of that "plane" or whatever it was and it shouldn't have been there at all. Yes we do see it that piece underneath that plane and this would no be under a commercial flight.
WTC7seven 3 months ago
Man, he needs to loosen that tie of his. His tinfoil hat might pop off...
ashinms 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IT WAS A BOMB ON THE END OF IT !!! TRUE
kieranfthompson 3 months ago
my guess C4 planted inside and the "pod" was a spare fuel tank
raggedsolution21 3 months ago
Hey assholes! Try comparing a the bottom of a United 767 to the photos of the bottom of United 175. You'll see, if you're honest, that there are no "pods" or "external equipment." it's simply the way Unbited aircraft are painted.
CombatATC 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOW CAN I PLANE WHO IST BUILD ONLY ON ALUMINIUM,GO ALL THE WAY TRTUH A STEEL STRKTURE?? IF U WANNA GO TRHUGH STEEL YOU MUS HAVE SOMETHING THAT IS HEAVIER AND STRONGER THAN STEEL,LIKE URAN938,,OR OR WOLFRAM,,also u need 3 times 1000 km fast to break trhu steeel structure,,
wtc was build that no plane can fly into,,theplane would falling down without entering,,lol,,,don belave that bullshit
MrDrumclown 3 months ago
Actually it was a Boeing 767 however it doeschave a flare around the landing gear but not in the fuselage itself. I showed it to a long time Boeing supervisor and she freaked when she saw it! First thought she had was it must be photo shopped... it wasn't. How much proof do the 911truth movement need? This is more proof then Kennedy's head moving backwards from the grassy knoll... hello!!!
flyzerogravity 3 months ago
i think Santa Claus had his hands on this one ! Fucking bastard we should assassinate him !!!
skuterixas91 3 months ago
@skuterixas91 die santa claus
FastUnit4 3 months ago
Comment removed
FastUnit4 3 months ago
I think the bottome part of the plane that was being talked about must have been some sort of cargo holding area, and if is possible, couldn't it be a "recycled" plane?
wessnyder117 3 months ago
If this spark was caused by the so called "missle" then how come it took awhile for it to go off?
robbysharolaid 3 months ago
FAKE PLANES
drgzor 3 months ago
watch this video
=yuC_4mGTs98&feature=channel_video_title
voodoowichdoctor 3 months ago
CGI PLANES
WTCallPLANESareCGI 4 months ago
FAKE PLANES
WTCallPLANESareCGI 4 months ago
I'm surprise no one comments that in every single video of the plane hitting the WTC, the plane is completely grey. There are NONE of the typical markings indicating it is a commerical United or American airline.
samsherpa 4 months ago
@WTC7seven
You must be Kurt Cobain
irpq11 4 months ago
I see it.
WTC7seven 4 months ago
My dad worked for AA he was on it before it left. he loaded it. it was a standard 767
dlegere 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Shills/Trolls/Disinfo (S.T.Ds) on here are under total control from their Handlers/Orderers/Masters/Owners (H.O.M.Os). Basically the HOMOs spread their STDs to try and infect free speech about 9/11 and stop people from spreading the truth, about 9/11 begging ppl to shut up, i wont do it, its so obvious and blatant, yet another false flag slaughtering 3000 innocent ppl, its disgusting, and the perps will burn in hell for it!
wellifthemediasaysit 4 months ago
you guys don't get it this was set up with a primer charge on the nose to go off on impact to set off the 1200lbs of termite in the outside containers to aid the jet fuel to melt the steel beams
SOAR1982 4 months ago
Oops, double post.
Why are they using a different company plane with different paint? There is nothing out of place on the belly of that plane. In fact, this video show it.
watch?v=5j_c1tPMiG0&feature=related
irpq11 4 months ago
There's nothing attached to the bottom. LMAO
BTW, you can also see the wings the whole time. Might wanna go let the guys in the 'disappearing wings' section know. They claim the wings disappear as it gets to the building showing that the planes were animation and not really there. LMAO
irpq11 4 months ago
@irpq11 ok,pilot
GabrielDhalaman 4 months ago
@irpq11 You must be Stevie Wonder. LMAO
WTC7seven 4 months ago
There's nothing attached to the bottom. LMAO
BTW, you can also the the wings the whole time. Might wanna go let the guys know that who say there were no planes at all. They claim the wings disappear as it gets to ghe building. LMAO
irpq11 4 months ago
Again. NONE of that is substantiated. A guy on YouTube rambling. AND btw contradicting other 'Truther' accounts. Of all the 'Legitimate' theories and 'proofs' out there NONE of them have solid foundation and MOST of them contradict one another. It's stupid to believe. I've covered this from the beggining. It's morphed to accomodate the debunking proof. And so the debunkers just said screw it. Not doing the round robin waste of time. But here .........
watch?v=75aTAwADDGE&feature=related
irpq11 4 months ago
@zelenko2
Yes I've seen that. She's nothing more than a Rush Limbaugh, cashing in on an opportunity.
However, since I saw that I found the most compelling video to date and has me sadly and reluctantly thinking our gov. is very crooked.
The most compelling video I needed to see........ watch?v=LbQrse84sIA&feature=related
irpq11 4 months ago
@irpq11 well.. there is a lot things that say it was an inside job... /watch?v=YOsZFmqgO5k&feature=related
zelenko2 4 months ago
no lugar do POD é um tanque de combústivel...
JoaoBatist4 4 months ago
you should watch the new video of the security cam above the floor it hit. it is a plane. cant see the under side. but there's also another one i dont know if it real but it shows a female pilot before impact. which terrorist wouldn't use women to do there work in there religion it would result in there version of hell.
Cronotfalcon 4 months ago
I'm not a conspiracy theorists but yeah I found this really ,really odd. Each Jet Liner was a huge guide missile loaded with thermite ready to explode on a timed detonator or a wireless detonator.It sucks what happened to those people that were trapped in the building and the fire fighters that were trying to rescue them.And what ever hit the Pentagon did not match the crash impact either.And if people witnessed the 2 nd jet said it had no windows and it was grey in color.
Drakon6956 4 months ago
@Drakon6956 there is no missle pod look for a video thats called debunking 9/11 anyways in it it shows the pics of the plane and he shows u ones he took of the same plane type and same paint job its just the paint and shadows making look like theres a pod. the reason the trade center fell was termite explosive placed along the main supports of the building. there is lots of proof of thermite in the free fall videos
Cronotfalcon 4 months ago
@Cronotfalcon
shadows of what
KeepHimAtBay 4 months ago
@KeepHimAtBay shadows of the plane. a plane cast a shadow, and any side that dosnt have light hitting it will have shadow. so the sun is above the plane. thus a shadow under the plane
Cronotfalcon 4 months ago
@Cronotfalcon
did this shadow cause building 7 to collapse?
KeepHimAtBay 4 months ago
@KeepHimAtBay noo the explosive's placed along the main support beams did maybe all im saying is it was a real plane with no missle. if u wonder why there is a flame when the nose touchs then research kenetic energy and watch recordings of plane crash test the nose will cause a explosion from kinectic energy, just like how a bullet makes a spark on impact of the nose
Cronotfalcon 4 months ago
@Cronotfalcon these were drone planes.. pod was atached.. be couse the pod left a MARK... a clear MARK... on teh fasade... fuck the pictures.. the mark on the fasde clearly tells there was something under planes
zelenko2 4 months ago
@Drakon6956 Thats because the planes ARE gray in that lighting condition!
specops1991 4 months ago
The missil shape attachment i think its load with termite that can generate 2700F that can melt metal frame of the tower, jet fuel can only reach 1700F
The free fall of the #7 building like NO resistant, this is the two most evidence, also pantagon plane the reackage engine height only 3 and haf feet where the fireman stand by next to it.
what kind ppl run us???
energyalt56 4 months ago
@energyalt56 Are you retarded, go look at a picture of the plane hitting the pentagon, its clearly a GIANT fucking hole. And plus when a skin thin aluminum airplane hits a MILITARY reinforced concrete structure of course its not gonna leave a perfect plane shaped hole. Fucking duh, it's called common sense!
specops1991 4 months ago
the ALQAEDA dont have the intelligence to set up this attack , itś impossible alqaeda do this with no help. the alqaeda its a scapegoat . CIA , and other organizations and the most powerful people in the world are involved, THE FEAR IS POWER AND CONTROL . BUT I DONT HAVE PROOFS , NOBODY IS GONE NO WHAT REALLY HAPPENS ITS A FACT .
MegaSick23 4 months ago
dose any body think there was a bomb on the airplane! iv watch every think on the 9/11 and cant see there would be any bomb being there.. em em still breath taking though when i watch this just no heart this people had to to this i think they have gone to hell not heaven!
tobacco311 4 months ago
well, I just love how having a tie and sitting in front of a computer makes you smart.
ashinms 4 months ago
I like how the video gets more likes then dislikes but the past day or so of comments is all against this...and they all are apparently experts on planes O.o
EsotericSanity 4 months ago
If the government was sooo smart that they managed to keep this all a giant secret, and btw HUNDREDS of ppl would need to be involved in this kinda op. Why the fuck didnt they just use a normal airliner jet? I promise you someone would have thought of this. Clearly not an iside job, its called a fucking PAINT JOB! Google it, the paint job on the UA 787 has that EXACT bump on the fuselage.
specops1991 4 months ago
@specops1991 u saying that it wasnt planned by bush etc... ????
zelenko2 4 months ago
@zelenko2 Yes, i'm saying that it was NOT planted by Bush or anyone for that matter. I'm an aerospace engineer and I was part of the plant management on the 767 and I can promise you that that bump is NORMAL for that aircraft, it's where we house the landing gear. All UA 767's had it.
specops1991 4 months ago
@specops1991 if u dont believe it was inside watch this... /watch?v=EavsvUn7QT8
zelenko2 4 months ago
DAMNZ... they all just talk about the craziest theories .. but never EVER bring any kind of real fact.. Sometimes they have a nice book to sell sometimes some `never seen before`(by millions of people) footage , copied in the worst quality. Where they see the craziest shits.. so crazy .. I mostly need 20 beers to actualy see it.. Its crazy.. get a job you idiots... Do something with your life... Something meaningfull.
R2daE01 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You people are morons.
irpq11 4 months ago
I just got to ask. For all of you, obvious low IQ, people believing these photoshop, video/audio mixer, story spinners doing these stupid edited videos how are we ever going to get a credible change to come forward in our gov. if you guys keep lapping this BS up? If I were a nutjob like the ones making these, I'd say the gov. is behind these stupid vids. To keep the 'crazy' label on us. Can't you idiots see that even the makers of these videos are laughing at you.
irpq11 4 months ago
@irpq11 u dont belive it was inside job??? ... /watch?v=EavsvUn7QT8 .. whatch this
zelenko2 4 months ago
Why-not-let-a-Jew-lease-the-towers.and-lace-them-with-explosives-and-make-3.5-billion.Then-get-rid-of-two-old-buildings-slated-for-demolition.Then-others-make-mega-millions,and-get-the-Patriot-Act-and-blame-the-Arabs-for-the
whole-mess.
tubeyou9878 4 months ago
"It's not a boxcutter"
I almost burst out laughing when I heard that.
belowthepovertyline 4 months ago
How about comparing them to the typical paint job of a United Air Lines jet? And the bulge is nothing more than the area where the landing gear goes. All of those models have these bulges. And study some friggin' science on kinetic energy if you want to know about the flash. All of this is nothing more than typical truther b.s. Even if you show them the science, they just scream coverup. Makes me ill.
cajtri87 4 months ago
@cajtri87 "How about comparing them to the typical paint job of a United Air Lines jet?" You mean you expect them to debunk their own twisted theory? Good luck with that. I used to work three blocks from World Trade and it makes me ill too to see that all these years later there are still people out there propagating this crap. More sadly though, there are still people believing it.
MarathonManPeatMoss 4 months ago
There is no "pod" It's obviously a reflection. I am in the air force, too, and I've seen attachments to aircraft before. This is no attachment. Besides, why would the Gov. put it on the outside? That would be the ultimate bonehead move of the century- putting it on the outside for everyone to see. And finally- that is no military aircraft. A five minute google search will reveal that that is, no doubt, a Boeing 767.
ashinms 4 months ago
In other videos you can actually see the thing on the bottom fire something. Smoke comes from both ends and a orange flash hits the building right in line with the attached object.
galaxything 4 months ago
WHAT I WANT TO KNOW AND I THINK ITS IMORTANT....WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THE PEOPLE ON THOSE TWO FLIGHTS THAT CRASHED INTO THE TWIN TOWERS SINCE THEY ACTUALLY WERE MILITARY PLANES INSTEAD OF COMMERCIAL PLANES...WERE THE PASSENGERS TAKEN SOMEPLACE AND MURDERED BECAUSE NONE OF THEM SHOWED UP AT THERE HJOMES!!!!
charliedog5258 4 months ago
@charliedog5258 May be the passengers were just fiction. If I tell you that Danny Jones died how do you know he did or didn't as Danny Jones is not known by any one so who knows if he died or not. The biggest clue though is that the Hijackers are still alive and that is a fact do a search if you want to confirm it.
galaxything 4 months ago
@galaxything None of the hijackers are alive. All truther crap. Everyone thought to be alive turned out to be a case of mistaken identity, or people with the same names.
eaglejoe8 4 months ago
@eaglejoe8 lol why lie? Lying just gives a bad name to all "official beilievers" man, there is so much info. It has even been said on the maistream news (what you official believers like to believe so much) that the hijackers are turning up alive and well. And it is not misstaken identity, names, families, places of work, adresses, pass ports all match up. Unless you are saying they are ALL victims of identity theft lol
galaxything 4 months ago
@galaxything Not all of them, just the ones believed to be alive. None of the 19 hijackers are alive. Saudi Arabia has even acknowledged this as well. Not one single 911 hijacker is alive.
eaglejoe8 4 months ago
@charliedog5258 They were all killed when their planes crashed into the buildings.
eaglejoe8 4 months ago
@charliedog5258 Really perhaps they were all abducted by Aliens and are being held somewhere within the Earths core.
brian6078 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@charliedog5258 Really perhaps they were all abducted by Aliens and are being held somewhere within the Earths core.
brian6078 4 months ago
@charliedog5258 maybe I should not have said they were abducted by aliens?Now I have given these conspiracy theorists new ideas.Who knows where they will take this.Stay tuned??
brian6078 4 months ago
this is such crap, these flights were obviously genuine passenger jets. if andone did any actual research instead of believing this crappy videos, they'd know of the people escaping the buildings, and only realising what hit the towers when all the falling debris out of the sky rained down and worker found paper copys of the flight tickets, as well as itineraries for family holidays and all sorts of personal belongings from the passengers. READ A BOOK, dont stare at a twat on a screen!
lerroc 4 months ago in playlist WTC hit video
Watch these Crazy people talk out there ass. They must be cooky?
PHATSOBIG 4 months ago
a search for pictures of 767 flown by american airlines reveals that the majority of planes are silverish, and just few had a darkblue underbelly which is polished and highly reflective like your bathroom mirror.
Now just tell me how one can confuse a reflection of the streets and buildings on the underbelly can be misinterpreted as to be a 'threedimensional structure' . people saying this are not even considering this to be a reflection.
tamaramj 4 months ago
So far here's the twoof theory:
16 Jewish secret service agents posted as hijackers did not hijack 4 planes, set up by the US government to be remotely flown past target buildings with missile launchers on them as holograms and cruise missiles slammed into buildings loaded with invisible super nanothermite after all the Jews had been evacuated. They then shot down their own 4th plane. Then, the government brainwashed all the witnesses and planted plane debris from different model jets.
nobraintheory 4 months ago
So we hired people to fly the plane or remotely controlled (took over) it to fly into the building with a big lump under it? (as if pilots non-complicit in the operation would not notice it a huge thing under it - too risky) The speed, the mass, the fuel, the office combustibles, the massive weight of the above-impact building were not enough? The answer is THEY WERE FAR MORE THAN ENOUGH TIMES TWO. You can go on and on with this conspiratorial crap for a million years....
Badwsky 4 months ago
Yeah, I believe the COKE-BOTTLE-GLASSES-GUY. HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!
Badwsky 4 months ago
hmm, the other fool with the "plane had no windows" does not mention this alleged shadow on the plane. the 2 of you should get together and conspire together. as a team, you may almost get somewhere. ...almost.
jablonskyisland 4 months ago
@jablonskyisland what do u say about this... /watch?v=dzUNvEfYDEQ
zelenko2 4 months ago
@zelenko2 SAY ABOUT WHAT?
jablonskyisland 4 months ago
Do a Google image search for "Boeing 767 underbelly" and see what comes up. Gee, there seems to be an awful lot of 767s flying around with "pods" on them. This video is about as dumb and pathetic as it gets. Come on, people. Go for a hike, go for a bike ride, get outside and do SOMETHING! Stop wasting your lives with this crap.
MarathonManPeatMoss 4 months ago
@MarathonManPeatMoss flight 175 was a Boeing 757 not a 767 buddy...... so you need to do some more research thanks : )
toxin2323232323 4 months ago
@toxin2323232323 You're wrong. And so is the idiot who posted this video. Have a nice day.
MarathonManPeatMoss 4 months ago
Why are the hijackers still alive? Apparently?
TheRootrootbeer 4 months ago
@ManardGCrebs ohhhh poor americans pooooor americans... after i found it was an inside job... im so scared of america
zelenko2 4 months ago
@zelenko2 i cant elive u still cant see it waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas an insise jobbbbbbbbbbbbbb... americans so stupid... i wish those who belive the goverment... would be in the wtc on 911.. and see the explosions inside and die in knowing it was an inside job... how more painfull can it be than knowing something and not being able to tell...
zelenko2 4 months ago
if that was a military plane, then what happened to the people that were on flight 175
zCmDx 4 months ago
@zCmDx i believe the so called hijackers were cia assets... they maybe really hijacked the plane and landed somewhere else... the hijacked planes surely werent those who slamedd into wtc 1 and 2
zelenko2 4 months ago
@zCmDx becouse a lot of them apear to be alive today :)
zelenko2 4 months ago
If a President received this type of info he would have freaked out. Bush knew already,this was more of a (sir mission accomplished). A child could decipher this from a video. He totally knew all about it or his reaction would have been hysterical. Don't you think?
eldiablo68 4 months ago
My theory on flight 11.
IF you know much about aerodynamics, and explosions with this video, the explination is very symple. That flash is white in color and shows no other products.
It is a sonicboom wave, or rather the condensation cloud as the nose of the aircraft punches through the sound waves. A fully loaded airliner at 100% throttle with that much fuel in it can easily break the sound barrier in a dive, which the plane was doing right before it impacted the tower.
FranBunnyFFXII 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
ae 911Truth dot com
PRESS FOR 9/11 TRUTH!!!
It Was AN INSIDE JOB!!!
surfingfrenchman 4 months ago
i belevie this now, but whatpuzzles me is that is the planes were modified or switch out, what happend to the people in the plane?
bumblebee561 4 months ago
@bumblebee561 what people ? in ourtimes planes can fly by remote control
kmdroell 4 months ago
@kmdroell woah! i knew it worked for smalled drones, but entire planes!!!!!
bumblebee561 4 months ago
@bumblebee561 yes it does . do your research
kmdroell 4 months ago
@bumblebee561 got killed by the goverment...
zelenko2 4 months ago
@bumblebee561 got killed by the goverment :) u know... its easy if u have power
zelenko2 4 months ago
@jhenn30 The truth of the matter is that if there wasn't any sort of secondary explosive device located at the site of impact or on the plane itself those towers would still be there today. Jet fuel would not have been able to take down those towers. It's physically impossible. The towers were designed to withstand the impact of planes.
IgnisFatuusIX 4 months ago
@IgnisFatuusIX The towers might have been designed that way to take the impact but they have done extreme test that have proved that the metal support beam with weights on them with jet fuel burning under them will get soft and twist which happened in the towers and cause them to fall
Trojanfan666 4 months ago
@Trojanfan666 who has done test man... no proof that the fire that day could couse the colapse to towers
zelenko2 4 months ago
@zelenko2 look up "steel being weakened by jet fuel" on youtube one video shows that over a couple mins the steel would "soften" to a point of twisting.. which in the towers would cause the floors above to fall... And it may not have been the initial jet fires that did it. but there was fire from the beginning to the end no one can dispute that
Trojanfan666 4 months ago
ok, so now why doesnt someone knock on the white house door and get an explanation for the pod
maadd100 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@maadd100 because they will bring you to Guantanamo
kmdroell 4 months ago
Being a flight attendant for United who lost co-workers on this flight, it was UNITED AIRLINES flight 175, and there were no "modifications" to a "Boeing 757" as the aircraft used in the fleet was a Boeing 767. If whoever posted this has a wet dream about a conspiracy theory, get your facts straight.
jhenn30 4 months ago
@INSONIASXPOWER no, its just us free masons, want to see our earthquake machine?
cronon94 4 months ago
what explains the piece of fuselage that had windows on the roof of 5 world trade center and the seat they found on the roof of 130 liberty
maikeliRAIWALUI 4 months ago
that pod was a misile lets not bullshit any longer
mrtoptenatten 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
R.I.P. to the 2,976 American people that lost their lives on 9/11 and R.I.P. to the 48,644 Afghan and 1,690,903 Iraqi people that paid the ultimate price for a crime they did not commit. Oh and the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who experience this everyday. Your 9/11 is their 24/7
TheChampiano 4 months ago
@WezzyStef907.....any proof for a existence of a fuse?
In my opinion the aircraft itself has the possibility to ignite jet fuel, so no need for a tiny fuse to start the whole mess is given.
i would also like to think it was a inside job, but still to many unanswered questions to convince me.
calw2513 4 months ago
@calw2513 bushes first response when he was told that the tower was hit is itself the biggest evidence... im like cmon... he s sitting an half hour there like nothing would have happened...... ??????????????????????????????????...
zelenko2 4 months ago
Dude, it was the fuse that ignited the fuel and explosives! That flash was it starting up then the plane crashes and fuel goes everywhere and ignites with the explosives...
WezzyStef907 4 months ago
@ManardGCrebs Taken away and disposed of?
WezzyStef907 4 months ago
Why no one talks about the onboard breathable oxygen?The 767 Aircraft has its crew oxygen tank on the right hand side in the E+E Compartment offset of the longitudinal axis below the cockpit.
This is only a hint, but oxygen fuels fire as well as flammable liquids....especially when it is stored under high pressure of approx. 1800 psi!
calw2513 4 months ago
I don't know how much evidence we actually need. I personally think I have seen enough. Two planes banging into buildings one by one. Causing enormous explosion (for a commercial air plane) and caused extreme demolition of the building that simply can't be caused by an airplane alone. Tell me there were explosives attached to plane or detonated in the building,i might agree. Felt so bad for innocent souls who faded to this tragedy. May almighty bring peace to poor souls and coming generations.
vigilaant 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pearl harbor attack led America to world war 2. 9/1 attack will lead America to world war 3 with Russia in Iraq for oil.
justicepartyuk 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) is a series of covert, and often illegal[2], projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.
COINTELPRO tactics included discrediting targets through psychological warfare, planting false reports in the media, smearing through forged letters, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, and extralegal violence
wellifthemediasaysit 4 months ago