Lance Armstrong can't ...

[foohi08]

So We Meet Again, 240p. :D

[jess1up]

This guy has half the nuts and could probably get more than twice the girls that all his haters could.

[axelay77]

can't touch this!!! LOL

[DestroyTheseWalls]

cant touch this -_-

[ilnn408]

lol good commercial

[mrtony80]

Great commercial.

[punaniswabber]

whos the girl at 14 seconds

[MaizeAndBlueLover]

Yamila Diaz

[NotEnoughProductions]

@punaniswabber tell me when u find out ahah

[10Cnote]

Who's the woman at 14 seconds?

[duveimperial]

Can't win ever again...

[YouBoob85]

So?

[videolover61]

You've got to be kidding! He is A WINNER! So it's no problem if he never wins the TDF again. See how he won the Leadville 100...question are YOU a winner?

[ALI340275]

you only have to be super good at one thing to be successful .

[monos70]

True, in life you are only THAT very good at one thing.

[C1330]

Agh!! Can't whittle. That's the best!

[SATCfan69]

Can't hula hoop!...love it :D

[STEProductions]

But he said he doesn't want to do politics.. would be sweet tho LOL

[ftcycling]

he is the best athlete and the best sportsman in the whole world.

[talibe801]

he´s the best period.

[mustardjunkie]

Cant tell the truth.

[ftcycling]

who can?

[pyropig7]

Your 37 years old!!! EVERY SINGLE LANCE ARMSTRONG VIDEO your ranting and ranting about doping, do you seriously! have absolutely nothing better to do with your time?? Get a hobby jesus christ

[mustardjunkie]

Wow, you can copy and paste the same thread to me over and over again!

[tybo09]

You gotta admit, he's on to something, though. I haven't seen a lot of Armstrong vids, but, in the ones I've seen, you've posted, more or less, the same crap about how he's doping in every freaking one of them.

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, GIVE IT A FUCKING REST!

[gracko14]

Fuck off! you're worth nothing more!

[jpzzzz]

Please someone I'm dieing to see some evidence he drugged himself... Until then, suck it up and stop making assumptions, it's been 7 Tour de France and no one ever got anything on him, it feels more like jealousy than anything else...

[HottRunner]

agreed, i bet half these people just dont know the possibilities of what someone who is motivated, like lance, can do. i mean all half these people do are sit at their computer looking at youtube videos to criticize.

Lance is easily the best athlete to have ever lived.

[Holden599GTB]

AMEN thank you, but yeah he is probably the best, but there are many other greats out there, but i veiw him due to the livstrong fun created by him funded by him and you barely ever see him get some kind of publication out of it, not a show like other celebrity's getting money out of a fundraiser

[HottRunner]

Yes, thankyou

I agree that there are many other amazing athletes out there. But Lance isnt out there to get his name up, he is out there to show possibilities that can come after having a disease such as cancer.

He's out there helping others by him doing what he loves.

Great guy.

To sum: Athleticism goes beyond what the particular person's body can do, it goes to sportsmanship, and helping others do their best as well.

[DHTCF]

@jpzzzz The evidence is there. The tests published in L'Equipe showed that Lance's samples from the 1999 Tour showed up EPO. OK, there are counter-arguments, like about how a B-sample cannot be tested, or about how the EPO got there, and we'll each have to make up our own minds re what we make of those, but to say that your dying to see the evidence, well, it is there.

[jpzzzz]

@DHTCF I understand that there was some controversy on 1999 Armstrong's samples, but if the proofs were that overwhelming, then he would have been penalized or banned from the sport. Was this convincing evidence? Not enough for the experts it seems, he continued riding his bike and won multiple Tour de France. Was he tested afterwards? More than once a month. Was there any tests that were positive over that 10 years period? None. I rest my case but I know psychotics will think of something else.

[DHTCF]

@jpzzzz If you are well informed you will know full well that the reason why Lance was not banned or penalised for the 1999 samples was that it was not possible to conduct a B test. The samples didn't test positive in 1999 (as no test for EPO then existed). They were later tested, and a journalist from L'Equipe was able to show that some of the samples that were positive were Lance's. Those samples had EPO. But lance could nto be banned because there could be no B sample tested.

[jpzzzz]

@DHTCF Let's say you are right about everything you just said about the 1999 samples (which I'm not agreeing since the allegations you're basing your argument on were never proved) and that we don't count the 1999 Tour. Not only did he win six Tour afterwards, but he did so while being the most tested athlete on the planet. So please, before saying anything else, just give me your references so I can shit all over them.

[DHTCF]

@jpzzzz In an earlier comment I had recognised the counter-arguments in favour of LA. Your last sentence demonstrates that you are not interested in a serious exchange about the arguments.

[jpzzzz]

@DHTCF No sir, I just told you that the allegations that you used for you argument were just that, allegations. The way l'Équipe handled the affair was so unethical that they couldn't use this as a proof. The tests were made in 2001, handed in 2005, who knows what happened in a four years span. Plus, LA had no way to counterproof with a sample of his own(even though he was tested multiple times). The last sentence of my post means that unless you bring something else to the table, I won't bother

[DHTCF]

@jpzzzz I believe that I recognised the arguments against the tests that formed the basis of the L'Equipe article in my post 2 months ago. Not sure about a terrible lack of ethics, seems like good journalism in obtaining the results and linking them to LA. No-one knows what happened in the intervening years? True. No possibility of testing a B sample? Again, true. There are arguments both ways. But to deny that there is any evidence against Lance is silly.

[jpzzzz]

@DHTCF Agree to disagree then. There is no way to guarantee that the samples that were in storage for four years were not tampered with. There is no way to guarantee that the documents linking the samples were not tampered with in four years. You tell me to deny any evidence against LA is silly, I'm telling you that to not confront the validity of a tabloid sport journal allegations is beyond absurd, especially when you fully know LA was never tested positive during most of his Tour wins.

[DHTCF]

@jpzzzz We can agree of the first part of what you say - you're right, there are no guarantees. There is some evidence, and there are arguments against that evidence. Also right to say that, for all that there is much to criticise about Lance (his attitude towards people like Bassons), there is also much that is praiseworthy. But then much the same could be said for most of us.

[death4sk8r360]

@jpzzzz you are sooo fucking right man you know whats up !!!!!!!!!

[LarsWittenbrock]

can´t do it clean.. :D

[jonathonpower6666]

neither can the others... everybody is doped... the difference is that lance is better than the other dopers

[schichten]

cant make eta cheese lol

[uluuluululu]

can't do it clean...

[Archaikos]

now that was low dude... that was really low. Even if he only has one. He's more of a man than you are because you said those 7 pathetic words.

[riffmeister76]

Cant get caught now

[riffmeister76]

Cant win a tour clean

[monos70]

HE CAN'T TOUCH CHUCK NORRIS!

[ochoastl]

that woman... is that Salma Hayek?

[ochoastl]

nm, that's Penelope Cruz.

[DBeckham512]

Both wrong... It's Yamila Diaz.

Seinfeld's great in this commercial, btw.

[jez135]

Can't tell a joke! Seinfeld haha..greattt.

[ro332]

Starbucks3954: calm down, it's just a commercial!

[kent406]

who said armstrong couldn't touch that woman?

[hooooopty]

She did. Haha.

[Cwetko92]

cool video =D

[tinky89]

i really dont get this.explain?

[adamBash211]

if u dont get this then ur thick!

its not complex and neither are you

[tinky89]

watever man...

[bienajax01]

HELLO DUDE... IS PRETTY SIMPLE

[tinky89]

ok thank u for ur help

[starbucks3954]

It just means you're not suppose to everything well in life. Like if you can't lift 500lbs, it doesn't matter, because we all have something we are good at. We should focus on that thing, and take pride in it. Also, it's to humble us too, Lance knows he's not God, since he can't do 2985892585 things, but at the same time he still respects what he can do - ride a bike really fucking well. Anyways, that's the message of the commercial, also to sell Nike crap.... At least this is my take.

[HiJumpHoll121]

take a deep breath, relax, its a fuckin joke

[DHTCF]

@starbucks3954 I think this commercial is a masterpiece. Most of us are bad at most sports, at least compared to the top athletes. This commercial tries to make us identify with Lance, in that he's bad at loads of sports too. But he can ride a bike (note, not he can win the Tour). Most of us can ride a bike, or run, or go to a gym class. This commercial is about getting people to realise it's not what you're bad at that counts, but what you can do. And buy Nike stuff to do it in. A masterpiece.

[starbucks3954]

@DHTCF I think that's almost basically what I said.

[boomerh91]

who said lance cant dance? he danced up how many mountains in his career? although lance in parachute pants is a must see haha

[siberia39]

Lance rocks. Perhaps Mr Seinfeld should ride a bike a bit more, eh, Chunky?

[MUFC216]

can doping?? Nice grammar putz.

[jstewjrome]

not a great commercial for Nike... usually like their stuff

[obscureluzername]

Maybe Lance can't dance but he sure can put the Hammer down.

[monos70]

He can win the tour 6542 times straight alright. but he cant dance better than me. (because Hammer taught me)

[lizardking939]

HAMMER TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can anyone else imagine lance wearing parachute pants dancing to that song?