@cycimian - The F4's wingspan is clearly greater than the width of the concrete block, so what we're seeing is the sheared-off right wingtip flying past the block, i.e. the wing does not cut through it. There's a more complete version of this crash test (added 4 years ago, in colour, with commentary and footage from multiple camera positions) available on YouTube. Everything that actually impacts the block (i.e. everything except the wingtips) is obliterated. The block survives intact.
i always find it weird that no one has the rest of the clip. we never get to see the damagae. we don't even know how much of the plane survived., if any. i wish we could find the original.
Interesting video 5* I know this is filmed by high speed cameras, but is it possible to do the same for the second impact or are there not enough frames or frame rate for comparison?
Pentagon quoting Rumsfeld the airbus evaporated. Collapsing into that tiny hole.
Amazing what happens when you use your eyes and do the research on the internet. Here we see the classic example of the wings not folding back. The sudden brakeing caused by impact actualy added the kinetic force to the wing and it cut like an axe rather then fold back. Anyways great vid. Thanks for highlighting something the mainstreams afraid to talk about.
Six minute video of the crash from multiple camera angles. watch?v=LWL1hwPQFoo
zonsb 6 months ago
So a plane can't both make a silhouette hole and disintegrate. Be invincible one instant then be so fragile as to vaporize the next instant.
zonsb 6 months ago
@cycimian - The F4's wingspan is clearly greater than the width of the concrete block, so what we're seeing is the sheared-off right wingtip flying past the block, i.e. the wing does not cut through it. There's a more complete version of this crash test (added 4 years ago, in colour, with commentary and footage from multiple camera positions) available on YouTube. Everything that actually impacts the block (i.e. everything except the wingtips) is obliterated. The block survives intact.
aeroflop 1 year ago
notice that little flash at the bottom, like in all the films, on underside.....umm good clip!!
semisonicTV 2 years ago
Oh, there's deceleration alright, it comes to a very sudden standstill and then reverses out of there in little pieces.
5*
MandoMohan 3 years ago
i always find it weird that no one has the rest of the clip. we never get to see the damagae. we don't even know how much of the plane survived., if any. i wish we could find the original.
uheardmebitch 3 years ago
Don't forget the engine was on the tail and the plane was being obliterated by the wall.
Wall - 100
Plane - 0
125nl84jpeg 3 years ago
Interesting video 5* I know this is filmed by high speed cameras, but is it possible to do the same for the second impact or are there not enough frames or frame rate for comparison?
youroom101 3 years ago
Pentagon quoting Rumsfeld the airbus evaporated. Collapsing into that tiny hole.
Amazing what happens when you use your eyes and do the research on the internet. Here we see the classic example of the wings not folding back. The sudden brakeing caused by impact actualy added the kinetic force to the wing and it cut like an axe rather then fold back. Anyways great vid. Thanks for highlighting something the mainstreams afraid to talk about.
cycimian 3 years ago
no deceleration but the plane is GONE.
MegsHead 3 years ago