I'm sort of new to this whole quantum stuff, but doesn't it have to do with uncertainty? Correct me if I'm wrong because I don't want to go around acting like I know what I'm talking about if I don't.
HELLO EVERYONE, I HAVE CREATED A SCIENCE APPLICATION USING THE DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT. I WILL ENCODE BINARY DATA USING PHOTONS WITH EITHER A 0 or 1 AND WILL BE CAPTURING THE WAVE INTERFERENCE PATTERN PHOTONS USING 5 INFRARED PHOTOTRANSITORS TO SEE IF THE DATA IS THE SAME OR DIFFERENT THUS POSSIBLY PROVING THE "MULTI-VERSE" THEORY.
Feynman's book: QED (strange theory of light and matter) treats this quite well. It is a book for the layperson and I would recommend it. There are a dozen other gems in there.
Feynman: "If anyone ever says they understand Quantum Dynamics - they probably DON'T."
Quite sure as physicists they tried any and every type of monitoring device because this baffled even Albert Einstein and every other scientist who has lived... but no it shouldn't interfere with the wave pattern anyways. Quantum mechanics states that all matter at a quantum level can exist everywhere at once until "observed" and this supports just that. Weird :)
um... so my question is what type of measurement tool are they using, because if that is emitting electrons just because of the type of tool it is. As amazing as this is, could that tool be the differentiating factor that made them change?
yes you are right, this video doesn't explain what "observing" is, and they make it seem like a scientist goes up and looks at the slits, but in actuality it comes down to the fact that every type of measuring device has to bounce of some sort of energy on what its measuring, but even when they measure with the smallest possible unit, photon, it still has a effect on the electron by collapsing the wave function. By why this is, and how to measure it is still a mystery
Well, the reason that stuff in quantum physics acts differently when it is being observed is because the measuring machines, which are the observers, are shooting photons at the particles in order to measure them, not because the light is conscious. The act of observing in quantum mechanics is not some passive act, rather it is involved with the experiment and will influence the experiments results.
@3Dthermalunderpants sooooo lets get the fock out from big brother society and leave life in its beauty FREEE and NORMAL IN ITS LAWS,.. LEAVE LIFE ALONE ATEISTS,..SCIENTISTS,..LEAVE LIFE LIVE FREE
Quite alot of these comments seem to be from people who already know more than the video is teaching.. So I just want to speak for anyone who's learning this for the first time in saying, "holy shit, what the fuck!?!?!?!"
Wasn't the elektron smart enough to know it was still being observed afterwards? Elektrons are dumb.
Our space is abstract, the minute your conscienceness tells you it's oughta be, its oughta be. Right now i'm flying with my lap-top over Rio. See ya in the 3D world.
Not that it matters, but they don't mention that the waveform collapses even if you 'turn on' the detector after the electron has already been 'fired'. The point is still made with this video.
Yes, Dr. Quantum tells you what "he" wants you to see... despite incorrect second premise. Looking at the model, there are three distinct "lines" of cancellation.
We must define the term "cancel" !
Does it equal: "multiply", or "nullifies the ALL portions of wave it passes thru")?
This is a fantastic visualization of a very tricky subject. Things get even weirder with a new variation on this experiment that seems to break the law of causality: Google "Scientific American Do-It-Yourself Quantum Eraser".
I'm sort of new to this whole quantum stuff, but doesn't it have to do with uncertainty? Correct me if I'm wrong because I don't want to go around acting like I know what I'm talking about if I don't.
SLemonspunk 4 months ago
/watch?v=HY-03vYYAjA
failtropolis 4 months ago
Holy fuck
Kanata343 5 months ago
It's Jimmy Neutron in the future!
Slaxl18 5 months ago
holy fucking shit my mind is blow
gorackify 5 months ago
HELLO EVERYONE, I HAVE CREATED A SCIENCE APPLICATION USING THE DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT. I WILL ENCODE BINARY DATA USING PHOTONS WITH EITHER A 0 or 1 AND WILL BE CAPTURING THE WAVE INTERFERENCE PATTERN PHOTONS USING 5 INFRARED PHOTOTRANSITORS TO SEE IF THE DATA IS THE SAME OR DIFFERENT THUS POSSIBLY PROVING THE "MULTI-VERSE" THEORY.
JosephFiero 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JosephFiero IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO HELP ME, PLEASE CONTACT ME AND GO TO MY CHANNEL TO SEE THE VIDEO OF THE DEVICE I HAVE BUILT
JosephFiero 6 months ago
Feynman's book: QED (strange theory of light and matter) treats this quite well. It is a book for the layperson and I would recommend it. There are a dozen other gems in there.
Feynman: "If anyone ever says they understand Quantum Dynamics - they probably DON'T."
myrtlebox 6 months ago
This sounds like something out of Doctor Who...@_@
CanaryKeeper 6 months ago
2:22 - A wild interference pattern appears!
zeusisbuddha 6 months ago
Quite sure as physicists they tried any and every type of monitoring device because this baffled even Albert Einstein and every other scientist who has lived... but no it shouldn't interfere with the wave pattern anyways. Quantum mechanics states that all matter at a quantum level can exist everywhere at once until "observed" and this supports just that. Weird :)
crazdaveed 6 months ago
where's the rest of this video?
MusicIhave 7 months ago
um... so my question is what type of measurement tool are they using, because if that is emitting electrons just because of the type of tool it is. As amazing as this is, could that tool be the differentiating factor that made them change?
dogonname 7 months ago
@dogonname
yes you are right, this video doesn't explain what "observing" is, and they make it seem like a scientist goes up and looks at the slits, but in actuality it comes down to the fact that every type of measuring device has to bounce of some sort of energy on what its measuring, but even when they measure with the smallest possible unit, photon, it still has a effect on the electron by collapsing the wave function. By why this is, and how to measure it is still a mystery
soulkillerk36 5 months ago
Highdeas sent me here
StratoBlaster420 7 months ago 19
@StratoBlaster420 Same here man haha
DirtyBaseKids 7 months ago
@StratoBlaster420 yip :D
MrCODforME 7 months ago
Comment removed
TheDawg412 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thumbs up if you came here from HighDeas. :)
bagelkel00 7 months ago
i think the camera disrupted the wave pattern somehow, im no scientistjust a guess but could this be true?
CRFisFTW 7 months ago
Well, the reason that stuff in quantum physics acts differently when it is being observed is because the measuring machines, which are the observers, are shooting photons at the particles in order to measure them, not because the light is conscious. The act of observing in quantum mechanics is not some passive act, rather it is involved with the experiment and will influence the experiments results.
3Dthermalunderpants 7 months ago 3
@3Dthermalunderpants sooooo lets get the fock out from big brother society and leave life in its beauty FREEE and NORMAL IN ITS LAWS,.. LEAVE LIFE ALONE ATEISTS,..SCIENTISTS,..LEAVE LIFE LIVE FREE
bondita 6 months ago
Comment removed
Princebaldwin21 8 months ago
Quite alot of these comments seem to be from people who already know more than the video is teaching.. So I just want to speak for anyone who's learning this for the first time in saying, "holy shit, what the fuck!?!?!?!"
dootmc 8 months ago 21
Wasn't the elektron smart enough to know it was still being observed afterwards? Elektrons are dumb.
Our space is abstract, the minute your conscienceness tells you it's oughta be, its oughta be. Right now i'm flying with my lap-top over Rio. See ya in the 3D world.
longjap 3 years ago
To observe electrons would interfere we have no instrumentation to do the detecting that would not interfere.
vi67 4 years ago
I wonder what happens with one observer in each slit
1DR31N 4 years ago
Lol he looks like my physic teacher.
DoggyMan2222 4 years ago
Not that it matters, but they don't mention that the waveform collapses even if you 'turn on' the detector after the electron has already been 'fired'. The point is still made with this video.
RobAlone 4 years ago 2
Perhaps the data used during this animation was out-of-date.
Chrisboe4ever 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it's just a psychological game.
Yes, Dr. Quantum tells you what "he" wants you to see... despite incorrect second premise. Looking at the model, there are three distinct "lines" of cancellation.
We must define the term "cancel" !
Does it equal: "multiply", or "nullifies the ALL portions of wave it passes thru")?
vi67 4 years ago
This is a fantastic visualization of a very tricky subject. Things get even weirder with a new variation on this experiment that seems to break the law of causality: Google "Scientific American Do-It-Yourself Quantum Eraser".
tritisan 4 years ago
Wow! I never understood the quote "collapsing the wave form" before. It's good to learn.
ltzippy2 4 years ago
Just subbed. think I'll stay awhile. Compelling & wonderfully presented.
aslipperyslope 4 years ago