Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (74)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thumbs up if u heard the Lucifer by shinee music starting in 0:22

  • The 360 version looks good, I have played it. According to IGN the PS3 version doesn't look as good.

  • dont forget pice of shit 3

  • Shitbox 360, lol now a handheld, the psp2/ngp, is about twice as fast, they better make a crysis 2 port to it

  • shitbox 360

  • 360 and PS3's versions both look like fucking shit. Its actually laughable. Thank god I'm not a cheapskate and built a gaming rig...

  • I already pre ordered the PC version.. but 360 looks great!!

  • 760p ftw!!!

  • The guy put the glasses in front of the camera thinking he is going in 3D, which face more stupid and idiotic. For the 3D qum still did not understand ... even the guy putting the glasses in the camera will not stay in 3D, because the 3d and a way that the brain turns .. and not the camera.

  • @2005gustavooi you're the actual idiot here, he's putting the glasses infront of the camera so we can see some actual footage in color as well as not being blurry as shit, each lens on the glasses filter away one image, he only has one camera so he can't record it in 3d, but he can hold the glasses infront of the camera so we get to see what the fuck is going on.

  • I'ts in 3D?

  • @biosim no they just made it really blurry and made you have to use 3d glasses for no reason

  • save 3d for cinemas. I'll get a 3dtv in around 4 years time.

  • pork fried rice please

  • "Running on teh 360, 760p"

    40cm next to the 360 stands a pc... Lolz just flippin.

    I bet it will be very good looking on 360, and ps3 prolly look better again.

    But Crysis is best experienced with a custom PC set up.

    Im going to get both Ps3 and pc versions.

  • I stopped after "760p"

  • LOL, It is in HD ? depends on console... so... 760p ? LOOOOL :D fuckin consoles.

  • Fuck console

  • for consoles yes, but for pc this looks horrible

  • @softbreeze941 Who are you kidding, most of todays PC games ARE console game. And it looks good even for PC BTW. NIce trolling.

    Sure Crysis one a maxed out rig can look better, and Crysis 2 on a PC will look better than on a console, but by no means does this look less than good for PC.

    Or maybe you had amnesia and were thinking you still lived ten years ago when pirates hadn't ended PC game development.

  • @Cryengine i bought far cry 2 for pc and for xbox and i compared them. xbox graphic = pc high graphic after high there is very high and the max graph is ultra high

  • @softbreeze941 And what I mean is, if you told me "hey this is a new PC game", I would think, hey, nice graphics.

  • for a console this look awesome

  • lol playing on 360 and PS3 on HD display is like watching DVD, so old technology.

    So many games can't even output 720p.

    E.g. MW 1,2 output 1024x600. That's 50% less than 720p!

  • Don't worry, crysis 2 will be better in pc.

  • What the guy before me said. Video is lame!!!

  • what is the point of recording a game in 3D and putting uploading it to youtube? It will just look blurry...

  • The only reason I watched this is because footage for the actual game is so rare.

  • he has a pc right next it it and hes like durr durrr il go to the xbox

  • Where's the PS3 version.

    I notice these guys are always showing everything except the PS3 version which has me especially worried, because if there's any place they are SUPPOSED to show the PS3's version, it would be at an Asian game and tech show.

    Clearly they are hiding it.

  • surprising the poor little 360 can run a high resolution at all

  • @snipedheadshot Haha go read about Computers and the various parts, then come back and say that again.

    You know, GPU = Resolution, Graphics rendering. CPU = Feeding the GPU with all information, while it can also do some minor rendering and Physics. And the 360s GPU is stronger than PS3s, but the PS3 has Cell, which only shines at times, but suffers when it comes to resolutions, I mean, GT5 at only 1280x1080 and inconsistent visuals and framerate, i mean, thats pathetic.

  • @mupp33n YOU might want to go read about computers, because you have no idea what you are talking about. If 1280x1080 is pathetic, then the Xbox is worthless. While the list of native 1080p games is small on both consoles, there are far more on the PS3. Hell, Alan Wake, a AAA Xbox exclusive runs at only 960x544. Now that's pathetic. Also Digital Foundry showed that GT5 runs at a nearly solid 60fps during gameplay, which hardly any games do.

    They both suck against PC, though.

  • @MrKickyourbutt Im a pc gamer, I dont give a shit about either console. And I have no idea what Im talking about? Uh alright. Where did I state anything about 360 being stronger and having higher resolutions? ITS CALLED FIRST-PARTY developers, Microsoft has NONE except Lionhead. Sony PAYS Naughty Dog, PD and shit to optimize the games to get the most out of it. Those who do games for 360, dont get paid for it, so why should they bother.

  • @MrKickyourbutt and 1280x1080 IS pathetic, every resolution below 1680x1050 IS pathetic, they are below "HD" and are part of the 90s.

  • @mupp33n 1280x1080 doesn't exist, you mean the old PC standard 1280x1024 (before monitors went widescreen) or the HD standard 720p. which is 1280x720 and defined as "HD". everything below THAT really is pathetic imo.

    but stating that everything under the current standard for PC, 1680x1050, is outdated makes no sense as 720p is the standard for TVs to this day and most of "TV" itself still isn't even HD.

  • @SuckItLily Does exist, for consoles, retard. And go to any tech forum and read about GT5, it runs at 1280x1080. 1280x720 isnt HD, its a resolution many people have had since the 90s, and if 1080p is 'full' HD then what is 1920x1200, 2560x1600 and above? Beyond HD? Are we from the Future?

  • @mupp33n 1280 doesn't exist as any sort of standard. sure EVERY resolution is possible, and especially on consoles all tricks available are used. the reason GT5 uses 1280x1080 is that it looks sharper than 720p (which is an/THE official HD standard FFS) and they couldn't make 1080p work. resolutions like the ones you named would be categorized under xhd, extreme high definition. don't believe me? fucking google it.

    what mgs and cod use (640p) is called "sub-hd" (AS I SAID BEFORE).

  • @SuckItLily Actually, 1280x1080 isnt sharper than 1280x720, because its not a native resolution where 720p IS.

    Also 4xQAA doesnt work as well as 2xMSAA they are two completely different types of antialiasing, why are you trying to teach me what sub-HD is when I already know what it is? And I know what beyond HD is, its beyond HD, there is no such thing as extreme high definition, if thats the case, then weve had 'extreme high definition' for a looong looong time.

  • @mupp33n 1280x1080 is Gran Turismo 5's native resolution. Native resolution just means what the game or television is designed to run at. GT5 renders at 1280x1080 and upscales or downscales to 1080p, 720p, or whatever. A 720p television's native res is 1280x720, and a 1080p set's is 1920x1080. 720p is not always a native resolution.

  • @mupp33n:

    1280x1080 has a bit more detail than 1280x720 because no vertical scaling to 1080 lines is needed. However, the QAA used in GT5 blurs the entire image, which is why GT5 looks better in 1280x720 (with MSAA) than in 1280x1080.

  • @mupp33n holy fucking shit dude. just LOOK IT UP. i marvel at your ignorance.

  • @SuckItLily What should I look up? Explain.

  • @mupp33n extreme HD exists, it's an officially defined range of resolutions, there's a fucking wikipedia article about it. instead of making shit up, educate yourself, you don't make the rules, others already have.

  • @SuckItLily Nope, there is nothing like Extreme HD, if there was, how come it wasnt called Extreme-HD pre-"HD" console and TVs? Nobody called 2560x1600 "Extreme HD" or anything about "HD" back then.

    Its just something you console kids like to say, cause its something you'll never experience.

  • @mupp33n could you please stop being a fucking idiot? the term HD is something that's TV producers use, console "kiddies" didn't come up with it. it's just a standard naming convention for declaring what a TV's native resolution is, HD-Ready being 720, and Full HD being 1080. XHD is something Nvidia coined at a convention some years ago, it's basically anything over Full HD. but noone really uses this term. now, if you don't actually have a fucking point, please stfu.

  • @whattheima Where did I state that console kiddies -came up- with it? I was talking about the so called newly-made-up "Extreme HD"

    And Full-HD, is nothing really. Its not -Full- HD. There is no -end- to HD, or resolutions for that matter, and we've had -HD- for over 15 years now.

  • @mupp33n I'm a PC gamer, and the term extreme high definition was coined by companies like nvidia to describe PC resolutions. LEARN TO READ, im outta here.

  • @SuckItLily Nvidia has never stated anything about "Extreme High Definition" if you have a source then give me one, but oh snap you dont.

  • @mupp33n nvidia . com/object/extreme_hd . html

  • @SuckItLily Haha wow so 1680x1050 is extreme HD.. Wow.. not really

  • @mupp33n Nope, anything beyond 1080p is called "pointless" you missed all the articles where scientific research has proven little to no benefit from resolution increase above 1080p when at the proper viewing distance from the source image? Our eyes cannot identify a difference in pixel density when at the proper viewing distance. If I were you I'd stop wasting my PC's resources on unnecessary resolutions and focus on how no PC game has gained GOTY for 6 years now

  • @wazark Wow, scientific research? Youre an idiot. Pointless? Youre an idiot. PC gaming no GOTY for 6 years? Really? Wow! You should take a look at each years Gametrailers GOTY for PC.

    Also, its not about pixeldensity you moron, the bigger the resolution the bigger view-area you get, there more stuff you see the more icons on the desk for example the more windows you can have open ETCETERA. And if there were no point then why would you not use Eyefinity? Its the next big thing for PC,

  • @wazark and eyefinity uses 3xxxX1xxx or if you have a bigger monitor (1920x1200x3) you get 5760x1200

    Now go tell me, there is no benefit at all. Dude, go back to your console. And actually, I dont give a crap about what reviewers think about a game and if a game gets a medal or not, thats what consoles look for not me.

    oh and btw, if there were no benefits when it comes to high resolutions, then why do they strive forward with resolutions on the PCp latform? Really.

  • @wazark Oh and theres a million comparisons between 1920x1080 (which no console game has got yet except wipeout and PSN games) and 1920x1200, and also higher like 2560x1600 and beyond as in Eyefinity, nvidia is now also focusing on a similar solution, however requires Sli to run.

  • @wazark And there is no such thing as "Pixeldensity" they dont get more dense the higher the resolution, they always stay the same distance from eachother no matter the resolution.

    Oh and if you didnt know, you can always see pixels, specially if you havea really big TV or monitor, and there is a reason why people notice dead pixels, they appear as a small miniature red dot on the screen, but wait, sorry im wrong... you cannot see the difference when it comes to pixels... oh wait Im right!

  • @wazark And go back to your console with 1280x720 (oh wait barely any games actually run at that resolution aswell) so you wont bother the Elitists anymore with your bullshit claims. Oh and take a comparison with for example WoW or EVE online or an RTS for that matter, and check the various resolutions, you may find yourself intrigued with the differences, they are big. The bigger the resolution, the more you'll see onscreen, the smaller the UI gets and you dont need any antialiasing at such res

  • @wazark Have you seen eyefinity?? higher res doesn't just mean better picture it meas more pixels which mean more screen real estate!!! the only console game I wish for PC is LA Noir!!

  • @SuckItLily Metal Gear Solid 4 ran even at 1024x600 stretched into 16:9. Now you gonna tell me that resolution doesnt exist either? And try to correct me that its "1024x640" ? :) You dont know much about resolutions, and consoles dont use the same numbers the PC does.

  • @mupp33n yet you guys are still waiting for a game that looks better than 2 year old Killzone 2.

  • @davidaj You guys as in who? The 360 gamers? Nah Im all good with my PC, and Im all good with my soon 4 year old Crysis that still look better than any console game.

  • @snipedheadshot

    better thn ps3 haha! :D lol kz 640x720! :D

  • Wow it runs 760p

  • if you want real graphics get it on pc

  • @crimson177 pre-ordered my PC copy @ gamestop already!!

  • @crimson177 No, if you want real graphics get Crysis 1 - crysis 2 looks worse than it, and it's almost a 4 year old game :/

  • @wazark well at moment yes but dx11 will be patched in to crysis 2 at some point.

  • @crimson177 At some point :/ really let us PC gamers down with Crysis 2

  • @wazark also the gameplay wasn’t that amazing especially when it involves the new aliens

  • 760p? Wut?

  • @hexashadow13 Yes, he said that 760p is the 360's max resolution because it depends on the limitation of the hardware. But i dont know if thats for 3d only or normal.

  • Qualitiy Made in Germany :) Crytek :D

  • @dieter008 lol buy turkish?

  • Thank you for uploading this, it made me happy. Especially now, that they changed the HUD a bit. :) Can't wait for C2 3D!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more