I dont know if this is intelligent design or not, but for an agnostic, i find the possibility of an intelligent creator equally as possible as not. There are very reasonable arguments for both sides. Putting evolution side by side with "intelligent design" is strange because evolution is a biology theory, and intelligent design, i thought was a hypothesis about the creation of the universe. I think people are confusing intelligent design with creationism. Can someone correct me?
@jomastretch Nobody is confusing the terms, they're just trying to use intelligent design as a new label because creationism gives off a obvious religious vibe. The game is to sound as scientific as you can without actually doing anything scientific, while reaping benefits from modern medicine that depend solely off evolution.
@jomastretch ID proponents don't use "reasonable arguments". They've (as you said) only an HYPOTHESIS (=unproven facts), while on the other side there's a SOLID SCIENTIFIC THEORY (= coherent well documented explanation for large amounts of proven facts), and still they claim there's a controversy.
Furthermore, when TRUE scientists explain them why their arguments are flawed, they don't dismiss the argument but keep it for the next audience. Not reasonable nor honest.
@Phamilygem@Phamilygem The music is listed in the info tab under the video, this is probably THE most common place to find information relating to a video. Simply put forth the effort to look for the answer. Music:
Self-Authored using GarageBand '09 There you have it- Evid3nc3 himself put that little bit of noise together.
@btwbrand You're mistaken, he edited and amalgamated a mixture of existing music/instrumentals, he did not 'make' them. However I'm asking for the 'name' of the music towards the end with the violin. There's a difference between remixing the songs and composing them.
@Phamilygem I never implied he "made" the sounds. I simply quoted what he said in the text then reaffirmed "He put that bit of noise together himself" :Implying he strung the sounds together from samples. He has stated numerous times in previous information fields that unless otherwise indicated the compositions of the sounds you hear are his own. Play with a sampling program and you too can combine blimps and pieces of noise into what seems like a straight rip of a recording.
I think teachers maybe should mention 'the controversy' is out there and dispel misconceptions, so a student doesn't find out about 'the controversy' and think it has any validity.
If evolution doesn't happen, vaccines don't work.
If evolution doesn't happen, why do I have a tailbone and an appendix?
If evolution doesn't happen, why has there been not one piece of theory-killing evidence brought forth in over 250,000 studies of evolutionary biology?
If evolution doesn't happen, why have we directly observed speciation in plants, bacteria, insects, and worms?
I can't believe people still argue about this to bolster their outdated superstitious beliefs.
@psychoh13 In the early 1500s, Leonardo Da Vinci opined that the appendix was there to suppress farts so that they didn't rupture the caecum. Research continues into the appendix's use.
Consider this as a replacement for appendix in my list. As the ultimate divinely designed living thing according to the Bible, why does the human being have blind spots in its eyes?
@ChipArgyle Because evolution is a bad designer... :P Don't get me wrong, I totally acknowledge evolution as a fact, as a real scientific theory. Unlike piece of crap like ID.
@psychoh13 I know, you were just bringing new information into the old argument about the appendix. I like da Vinci's take on it. So many of the great minds throughout history also had weak thoughts. I just had to throw it in there.
What's great about evolution is that the older form is out competed by the new improved version until the older forms go extinct and leave nothing to show they ever existed.
When people deserve to be tortured for their IQ there is NO statement stupid enough to make them sick. When people deserve to be tortured for their IQ statements only need to support their cause.
1:30 “Without [evolution] research in [biology] would not exist.”
@ikthat121q He asked you WHY, too. We know the earth's age is 4.55 billion years with about a 1% error. The oldest rocks we can use various radiometric dating methods on have been dated as being 3.5 billion years old, due to plate tectonics. The rest is known thanks to meteorites. Global warming is a fact since we can measure it, the average temperature has increased allmost 1 degree Celcius since 1880, and it's rising at an increasingly fast rate. It's a well understood phenomenon.
I love your videos...very smooth, gliding from point to point logically and easily. Talk about shutting down their whole argument in two and a half minutes! All they could really say after that is "Satan evolved bananas to trick us!" They don't have a leg to stand on.
@foojuice101 Your extreme apparent mislead beliefs on "sound" supporting evolutionary facts is most disconcerting. @lethalsub Contrary to your openly displayed belief- many "scientific" books are riddled with theories that stray from the truth.
@ikthat121q By the way, this isn't allowed. You can't just state that science is "riddled with mistruth" and expect to get away with it. Care to show us a specific example of one such widely held belief, and why it isn't true? I would be astounded if you could.
The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, not on the one rejecting it. Disbelief is the default position.
Now, Creationists and Evolutionists are both making claims: Creationists say that biblical things happened, and Evolutionists say that evolution happened.
Both groups have to provide skeptics with sound evidence that supports their claims. The difference between Evolutionists and Creationists is that Evolutionists have sound, scientific evidence supporting evolution.
The objective of the creationists is not to provide evidence for their claims, but to muddy the conversation and create doubt. If they can create doubt, they can wedge their ideas into the classroom. They believe what they're doing is moral, and they will NEVER stop trying to kill off views that don't support their own.
I introduced the subject of flat earth because just as evidence led on that the world was flat , ther is now supposed evidence that ther is evolution. Would it not seem likely could be incorrect? Not just flat earth concept?
@ikthat121q I am not sure where the whole flat earth thing originated. Long, long ago they knew that the earth was round, even long before Ptolemy. The Greeks saw the earth as a sphere, and even had angular calculations based upon the stars movements to prove it mathematically. If anyone ever believed the Earth was flat, then this belief rose from the RELIGIOUS DARK AGES, that long period of highly catholic feudal government, during which knowledge and learning were forsaken for "faith."
I have in fact written many papers (some exceeding 20 pages) on such information on boths sides so I do believe I have seen "a spec of it." Unfortunetly controverse to your belief that buffboynick is a minority in his beliefs, many people believe that just like scientists were sure the earth was flat, and scientists were sure the sun revolved around the earth, that this belief in a evolution of the world is such a similar belief. The
@ikthat121q Messages or comments. Not both. Here's a short reply.
About the "once believed the flat earth", yes, in the 1st milenium, most intelligent people agreed that the world was flat, but at least that's what the evidence was pointing to at the time. Now, even if evolution isn't true, it's what's the evidence is currently pointing to, a fact buffboynick cannot get into his head properly.
I do in fact believe this is you. You say that from your standpoint yes, but as you encouraged buffboynick and the others, from the countless millions and millions who believe there is a higher power(s) -it would seem to not believe in a higher power is simply laughable- Evidense that could be looked at both ways- you are simply looking at it one such way.
Now would be the time to reach for small opportunity to bring your self to the level the rest of us here stand, by admitting you are so very incorrect. Evolution is a theory no? Point proven.
@anticorncob6 Your obscene language neither furthers this conversation nor aids your mislead points you are attempting to make. It simply suggest a comming realization of your incorrect stance or a severe lack of maturity.
"Contrary to this belief among the anti-evolution movement proponents, evolution of life forms beyond the species level ("macroevolution", i.e. speciation in a specific case) has indeed been observed multiple times under both controlled laboratory conditions and in nature.[12] The claim that macroevolution does not occur, or is impossible, is thus demonstrably false and without support in the scientific community."
Did you check the source on that comment evo-clown?
Its from Evolutionist Website Talk Origins__FACT
That means it has ZERO credibility. Nice biased info there ape-man believer. There is ZERO evidence of Macroevolution__FACT. Its UNobserved both in the fossil record and in current observation.
Try reading some peer reviewed literature from REAL Biologists like Dr. Gordon C Mills. You got PWNED 100%!!! lol
Citing an entry from Talk Origins on Wikipedia is not "evidence" kid.
Rather sad that you didnt know that Talk Origins is a known EVOLUTIONIST website__FACT
How bout you goto True Origin (dot) org to see some REAL science. They totally refute Talk origins and their debunked anti-science. The average evolutionist has an extremely LOW IQ
@buffboynick Okay, quit replying! You obviously do not understand our side. I've decided debating you is pointless and you're too ignorant to truly engage. I can refute everything you say, but you're not going to listen. So please stop replying! I get it- you haven't seen the evidence and you're now claiming it's not there. Just stop!
Traditional Darwinian evolution has consistently been DISPROVEN. That is why many scientists (like Dr. Rhawn Joseph and Dr. Michael Denton) have come up with their own new kinds of "evolution".
The New Evolutionary theories make far more sense (even though they arent as good as Directed Panspermia and Intervention Theory).
Darwin had NO DEGREE in BIOLOGY__FACT. His writings are also VERY racist!!!. Now, GTFO!!
That's like asking me to "understand" Flat Earth Theory.
I'm not into outdated, obsolete, pseudo-science like "evolution magic". Its NOT science, never has been. Darwin had no degree in Biology and was a vile racist__FACT.
What's even worse.....was that he belonged to a Masonic order (The Rosicrucians)
@buffboynick If you truly did understand our side you would know we really do have a lot of evidence. I'm sorry, but if it's the 21st century and you still don't believe in evolution, you are plain stupid. Poor cock smoker buffboynick thinks it's the other way around.
You believe so fucking strongly we're the ones that are wrong you won't even bother to see our arguments. Get an education.
The most evidence is the 3rd option (Directed Panspermia and Intervention Theory)
That's why UFOs are always making the news. They conduct genetic engineering, terraforming, and life-transplantation experiments. You have no education.
You have no knowledge of biology, human genetics, and real science. Macroevolution and abiogenesis is the RELIGION of naturalism. You are MORE "religious" then Creationists. You dont even have a high school diploma__FACT
@buffboynick "You have no knowledge of biology, human genetics, and real science."
With that said even after I explained to you that I do, I have come to conclusion that you will only ignore what I have to say and strawman and lie. Shall I bother to pick apart more of your responses, I don't know.
As soon as any evotard finds the mythical "ape-man shared ancestor" or explains The Cambrian Explosion, Living Fossils, and the fact that information (DNA Code) demands a SOURCE and doesnt just magically create itself then people will listen to "evolutionists"
No wonder so many Christians "believe" in evolution.....its another dumb religion of supernatural nonsense.
@buffboynick you dont believe in magically created things right? me too. by the way god created everything from nothing dont you remember? from nothing he created light. from nothing he created plants animals. from nothing he created dirt and thats what man is made of.
@sapunec7854 to understand the true meaning of the bible one must learn hebrew. why people read an english bible or a bible translated to modern day languages we need hebrew bible man.. hahahaha
@princerexor It makes even less sense then - there are "godS" all around the place, Jesus is not a messiah of any sorts, the ten commandments become something completely different & so on & so forth
@buffboynick "Darwin had NO DEGREE in BIOLOGY__FACT. His writings are also VERY racist!!!. Now, GTFO!!" You call Darwin a racist, then you make fun of someone saying 'maths'.
Its a well documented FRAUD. Evolutionists have staged Numerous Hoaxes (like Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man)
The Facial Eye Characteristics of Asian Humans are found NOWHERE in the animal kingdom__FACT
Not one brain dead ev-LIE-utionist has EVER logically explained Asian Eyes using "evolution". There is no "evolutionary explanation", only a Genetic Engineering explanation. Evolution is more RELIGION than science.
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? DID YOU PAY ANY FUCKING ATTENTION WHEN THIS GUY TALKED ABOUT PROEJCT STEVE? YOU CLAIM THAT LOADS OF SCIENTISTS ARE CREATIONISTS, DEBUNKED, NO STRAWMAN THERE.
YOU THUMBS UP YOUR OWN COMMENTS, WHAT A FUCKING LOSER.
IF YOU WANT BAT ORIGINS OR ANYTHING ELSE, LOOK IT UP BEFORE USING IT AS EVIDENCE OF YOUR SHITTY BELIFS.
No kid, the majority only accepts OBSERVED variations of color and size within species over time (often called microevolution).
They dont accept the delusional and UNOBSERVED fantasy of abiogenesis and macroevolutionary transitions. In fact.....there is not even one Peer-Reviwed experiment showing a single-celled organism become multicellular__FACT
Oh how embarrassing how you lying evoTARDS get OWNED with those pesky FACTS ;)
Name on "peer reviewed" scientific article supporting macroevolution
Macroevolution (also called "transmutation") is UNobserved in nature and in lab experiments__FACT
Only "scientists" that engage in erroneous SPECULATION "believe" in macroevolution. Both Bats and the Platypus refute evolution.
Other species (such as the Venus Flytrap Plant and Sea Lions) also dismantle you little evo-MYTH. Sea Lions were created through genetic engineering (mixing Dolphin DNA and Canine DNA)
You got OWNED on Bat Origins (just like I consistently OWN you on other videos)
Scientists with PHD degrees (unlike YOU) that dont believe in ev-LIE-ution and have videos on here,
Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Paul Nelson, Dr. Michael Denton, Dr. David Menton, Dr. Ian Macreadie, Dr. Ann Gauger, Dr. Michael Behe, Dr. John Sanford, Dr. Jonathan Safarti, and Dr. Stephen Meyer
The Blue Website Link on my page will shows the 20 page LONG list of scientists that dont believe in evolution
@DisprovingEvolution YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT, YOU'RE THE ONE WITH AT LEAST THREE SOCK PUPPET ACCOUNTS, MAKING STRAWMAN ARGUMENTS, AND LITERALLY LYING TO SUPPORT YOUR SHITTY BELIEFS.
@buffboynick "I want to hear one brainless evotard like you explain the "evolutionary adaptation" that explains Asian Eyes!!!"
YOU FUCKING IDIOT, THEY STAY IN THE SUN, HUMANS ARE DIFFERENT FROM OTHER ANIMALS.
NOTHING YOU SAY DISPROVES EVOLUTION, READ A BOOK, IF YOU ACTUALLY UNDERSTOOD OUR SIDE YOU WOULD KNOW THAT WE'RE THE ONES THAT ARE RIGHT, BUT YOU FUCKASSES DON'T GET IT.
BBN is 100% correct you delusional little TROLL kid.
There is no logical evolutionary explanation for the facial eye characteristics of Asian Homo Sapiens and that is a fact.
If you "think" sunlight magically caused Asian eyes to "evolve' like that then you are more IGNORANT than previously thought. There is more sunlight (and HEAT) in Africa and the Middle East then Asia__FACT
Plus whites live in Asia too (Russia). You're such an ANTI-Science evotard its laughable!! LOL
Ouch! Man you destroyed that sad little evo-boy so bad that its painful to watch LOL.
No wonder he has to troll videos spewing LIES and anti-science garbage.
These evo-nutjobs "believe" a magical UNFOUND ape-man "shared ancestor" caused the polar opposite (and contradictory) "evolution" of both chimpanzees and early humans!! And that his magical mutations caused BOTH SEXES to gain the same macroevolutionary genetic traits! haha!!
@buffboynick "he has to troll videos spewing LIES and anti-science garbage"
WRONG
"mutations caused BOTH SEXES to gain the same macroevolutionary genetic traits"
HOLY FUCK YOU ARE A MORON, DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW EVOLUTION WORKS? DO YOU FUCKING THING IT WOULD BE SUCCESSFUL FOR A MORE EVOLVED WOMAN TO MARRY A LESS EVOLVED MAN?
In order for a TRULY NEW species to produce more of its kind than it would need an opposite sex counterpart (with the same NEW genetic traits) to reproduce with to ensure they both can produce more of their NEW kind.
That is why SCIENCE PROVED we did not come from Neanderthals
As an example, if a "Neo-Sapien" was born tomorrow from a Homo Sapien, it would need another of its own kind to ensure it could make more Neo-Sapiens. You got ow, ow, OWNED!
Great Comment. You're making this kid the laughing stock on here!! lol
These little evotards literally "believe" an unfound ape-man shared ancestor spawned both Chimpanzees and early humans!! Nuts!
That's more RELIGION than science. Its also mentally insane! These evo-nutjobs belong in a mental hospital. Thanks for the reality check, you're doing a better job educating this kid then his own parents ever did haha.
Science proved we DID NOT come from Neanderthals__FACT (that's accepted by evolutionists as well)
Evolutionists theorize that Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals "share an ancestor". They PROVED we did not come directly from Neanderthals dumbass__FACT
The THEORY is that Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals diverged in lineage from Homo Heidelbergensis or Homo Erectus. That theory is even less plausible, since we are LESS genetically similar to those 2 hominids.
Looks like the little school boy is angry that his INEPT arguments are consistently dismantled with FACTS and peer reviewed evidence.
Believing in evolution in 2011 is the equivalent of believing in FLAT EARTH THEORY
Its an outdated, disproven, and ignorant theory and you just got schooled with REAL science. Us Homo Sapiens 1st appeared 200,000 years ago (some scientists say 400,000) and we are STILL Homo Sapiens today__FACT
@evoTARDSareINSANE "Believing in evolution in 2011 is the equivalent of believing in FLAT EARTH THEORY"
WRONG YOU FUCKHEAD, TO *NOT* BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION IN 2011 IS TO BELEIVE IN A FLAT EARTH. WE REALLY DO HAVE A LOT OF EVIDENCE, BUT RETARDED FUCKS LIKE YOU LIE. WE'VE ALREADY PROVEN EVOLUTION, BUT YOU DIPSHITS STILL DON'T ACCEPT IT.
"Us Homo Sapiens 1st appeared 200,000 years ago (some scientists say 400,000) and we are STILL Homo Sapiens today"
Rather hilarious that you accuse others of having "sock accounts" when you have 2 that I know of Rubik's cube BOY lol.
How bout you stick to math and refrain from spewing faslehoods about Biology (a topic you clearly know NOTHING about)
My channel has so many links to scientists refuting evolution and peer reviewed scientific papers refuting evolution that its overwhelming. You got PWNED by non creationists like BBN and by Old Earth Creationists like me and ETAI. Butthurt?
This sad kid clearly has ZERO understanding of Biology or Genetics and you (and this video) have been REFUTED by science numerous times.
The examples of "evolution" in this video are often called "microevolution" (that's variations in color and size within family classifications)
Macroevolution has NEVER been observed__FACT. Macro is one kind becoming an entirely different kind. That would be reptile to bird, amphibian to mammal, etc. You got PWNED hard dumbass
Macroevolution is a RELIGION kid. Its UNOBSERVED, erroneous speculation and junk science.
Microevolution (poor name, since its not actually "evolution") actually refutes macroevolution.
If you have the blue print to build a car, you cant build a space shuttle. This a metaphor for the DNA CODE BARRIER. Try actually reading a book you moronic "ape-man believing" TWIT!!!
The DNA Code Barrier prevents macroevolution from being possible!!! Bugs make bugs, humans make humans!
@buffboynick WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO FOR OBSERVED MACROEVOLUTION.
I'VE READ BOOKS ON EVOLUTION, I STILL ACCEPT IT, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO STUDY. ACUTALLY LEARN OUR SIDE AND QUIT IGNORING US AND STRAWMANING US. I'VE LEARNED YOUR SIDE AND I HAVE BEEN FORCED TO CONCLUDE YOU ARE FUCKING IDIOTS.
The video discusses Wolves leading to Dogs (BOTH are in the Canine family, and so are foxes and coyotes dumbass)
Then it talks about Broccoli and Cauliflower (BOTH are vegetable plants)
Those are STRAW MANS retard. Everyone (including Christians, which I am NOT) accept variations in color and size within FAMILY classifications (often called Microevolution)
What's NOT accepted (by anyone with a brain) is Macroevolution.
Living Fossils and Genetics REFUTE Macroevolutiion__FACT
I've listened to Gould, Dawkins, PZ Meyers, and Joyce (all are evolutionists)
Then compared them to REAL scientists like Wells, Denton, Menton, Crick, Berlinski, Meyer, Safarti, Sanford, and billions of other non-evolutionist scientists!!!
Look kids, little evo-boy "cherry picks" the scientists he listens to haha!
Number 1...evolutionist "scientists" arent REAL scientists
Number 2....evolution is the most FAILED, outdated, obsolete, and discredited theory to ever be thought up. There is no logic or observation of macroevolution or abiogenesis
Even the Molecular Biologist that discovered DNA (Dr. Francis Crick) said it would be impossible for DNA to have come by chance__FACT. So he theorized "Directed Panspermia"
Its shocking how incredibly ignorant you are about the subject of Biology/Genetics.
I suggest you read some Peer Reviewed Publications from REAL scientists like Biologist Dr. Gordon C. Mills.
The non-evolutionist scientists consistently dismantle the fraudulent LIES used by evo-pseudo-scientists. That's why frauds like you stage evo-HOAXES like Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man. Tsk, tsk.
@evoTARDSareINSANE YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR SIDE. I'VE BEEN TO LOTS OF CREATIONIST PLACES AND SAW PRESENTATIONS FROM CREATARD SCIENTISTS... I KNOW YOUR SIDE AND NOT IN AN ENTIRE BOOK CAN I DESCRIBE HOW STUPID IT IS TO NOT ACCEPT EVOLUTION.
Its rather hilarious how many times I have DESTROYED your sad, little evo-delusions on here. Tsk, Tsk.
I recommend you get a high school education before you run off at the mouth kid. You havent even completed middle school yet and you're trying to refute the work of REAL PHD BIOLOGISTS like Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Michael Denton, Dr. Gordon C Mills, Dr. Paul Nelson, Dr. John Sanford, Dr. Stephen Meyer, and Dr William Dembski.
"Early Humans and Chimpanzees both diverged in lineage from an ape-like shared ancestor"
That ^ is seriously what evo-clowns believe haha!!!!
If that's not "religious" then I dont know what is. All religions suck!! I prefer the truth!! Genetic Engineering and Directed Panspermia by advanced races (we are an experiment)
Not to mention.....government insider testimony confirms it. Homo Sapiens = Genetically engineered experiment
And too bad for you that Chromosome 2 Fusion is a tell-tale sign of genetic engineering (among other signs in the human genome)
Evolution IS belief in the supernatural. Its BELIEF in UNFOUND "ape-men shared ancestors" that caused the polar opposite (contradictory) progression of Chimpanzees and humans!!!
Its "belief" in UNOBSERVED mutations that can magically add large amounts of NEW information to BOTH SEXES of a species genome causing radical transformations. U = HYPOCRITE
@buffboynick "Evolution IS belief in the supernatural"
WRONG
EVOLUTION DOES NOT REQUIRE MAGIC TO WORK YOU DUMB ASS FUCKTARD.
"Its "belief" in UNOBSERVED mutations that can magically add large amounts of NEW information"
IT HAS BEEN OBSERVED AND MUTATIONS ALLOW FOR NEW INFORMATION TO BE ADDED. I ALREADY EXPLAINED THE BOTH SEXES THING, BUT YOU CREATIONIST FUCKS IGNORE WHAT I SAY.
Mutations NEVER add large amounts of NEW information__FACT
The ONLY mutations that have been "claimed" to be beneficial are antibiotic resistance in bacteria and HIV immunity in some humans__FACT. And BOTH have been discredited since it was actually gene depletion that caused both of those "beneficial mutations"
As for mutations adding LARGE amounts of New info (unobserved FANTASY). This is why Bats and the Platypus both have no evolutionary explanation.
The only one getting "debunked" here is you and your RELIGION of evolutionism kid
Link 10 on my channel (and evoTARDSareINSANE's channel) is to all the PEER-REVIEWED journals supporting intelligent design and refuting evolutionism__FACT
Peer Reviewed Journals from Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Stephen Meyer, Dr. William Dembski, Dr. Michael Behe, and Dr. Michael Denton__FACT. I encourage all to view my channel and click on Link 10 and expose this LYING clown "anti-science-cob"
@ikthat121q There are 300,000 peer reviewed papers for the existence of evolution. Want proof (or good evidence), read some of them.
There are approximately 0 peer reviewed papers against evolution. There is currently zero scientifically verifiable evidence against the theory, and if there is any such evidence, it will win the noble prize.
I think you're the ones that need to prove your position.
What a sad little liar. Glad these dudes on here are PWNING you with real science and actual facts
There are numerous peer reviewed journals, articles, and books refuting evolution. Easy to find online. Took me 2 seconds to find them
You're just a hypocritical "ape-man believing" evotard that has faith in unobserved mutations that can magically defy DNA and miraculously add large amounts of information to both sexes (LOL) of a pre-existing species. Total BS and you know it
Both DisprovingEvolution and evoTARDSareINSANE just bent you over and gave you the business like the sniveling little bitch you are, hahahahah!!!
Link 10 on their Channels goes directly to the Discovery Institute's list of PEER REVIEWED PUBLISHED Scientific Journals REFUTING evolution and showing OBVIOUS evidence for Design__FACT
You got PWNED hard you sad, little evo LIAR!!! lol
One problem, none of your examples of evolution (dogs, bananas etc.) involve random mutation, which is the real controversy. Also, can we possibly get past the idea that if you don't agree 100% with a scientist from the 19th century then you are a bone-chucking creationist tool (99% of intelligent design advocates)?
I see the vast universe as the beginning of science exploration in the same way you see the end of creation. I see the bible as nothing more than a fiction in the same way you see the all knowing god's written word.
Here's a simple question to this oft repeated claim. Why in the world would biology suddenly fall apart if evolution were removed? Nope, all research is being wrapped up, we're not doing this anymore, evolution is wrong. And if you really believe that, doesn't it make it all the more imperative that evolution not be questioned or disproven? Why biology would cease to exist if we did that, and we can't make that sort of sacrifice, so we will never question evolution.
@Sickopath333 We question the details of the theory of evolution every day. The theory is rock solid and overwhelmingly supported by evidence.
It's amazing that so many people still believe anything in a book that begins with an invisible wizard making things appear out of nowhere by magical means.
@ndrthrdr1 You didn't even answer my assertion. If people really believe that biology is so intertwined with evolution that you would kill biology if you removed evolution (slight paraphrase on this video's word usage) doesn't that make it necessary to protect the theory at any cost?
It's amazing that so many people still believe anything in a book that has the word science on the cover, accepting it blindly as unquestionable fact, never questioning its assertions or claims.
I am an atheist i don't think intelligent design should be in school but if it was it would be so easy to pass the tests every answer would be god did it.
Some great points. It's sad that actual scientists would sign a list against evolution. Science is suppose to be unbiased, yet creationist videos and sites are pretty biased and ignore evidence of the other side. It's also sad how creationists like TruthIsLife7 and tetrahydroscope reply to so many evolution comments sprouting their nonsense and clog up the comments section. Thank goodness this doesn't happen on most videos that DON'T mention the controversy, trying to educate innocent children.
@xxyodiexx First of all, the video is not trying to convert you to anything; it was just trying to tell you that Evolution is not a controversy, rather Creationism is. Second of all, evidences from history have shown that the established religions have done more harms than good for the human race; therefore the world would be much better without them.
I don't get the point of the video. I know why, as a christian, I would like to convert people to Christianity. But, as an atheist, what is the motivation? To tell all the Christians they're wrong? If people are happy being spiritual, what does it matter? No one has the real answer. I'm not going to sit here and say I'm right and you're wrong, cause honestly...no one can prove that. So, what's the point? Just let people be happy...even if you think they're idiots ;)
@xxyodiexx religion is a cancer especialy if you try to run the govenment or pay off political members to have prayer in school,or hate gays,or pray to god for wars,or kill in the name of your god,or pray for rain,or start wars like bush,think your view is the only way to see something...think the bible is some kind of moral code.yes all religion is a virus that needs to be wipe out.you can start by rebooting your brain.
@xxyodiexx Religion =/= happiness. Religion tells you hell is waiting if you did the wrong things. Religion imposes idealistic moral on people yet itself is corrupted(oh child molesting popes!). Religion constantly demands offering from both mental, spiritual and in physical(money) forms. Religion hates unknowns, non-fiction, science, gay people,...etc.
I see a happy gay couple in the same way you see a pair of abominations.
@xxyodiexx same could be said about pushing the teaching of creationism in schools.. it would be a huge step backwards for the entire public school system especially in this day and age when already our species are messing with DNA structures to create new products.
I dont know if this is intelligent design or not, but for an agnostic, i find the possibility of an intelligent creator equally as possible as not. There are very reasonable arguments for both sides. Putting evolution side by side with "intelligent design" is strange because evolution is a biology theory, and intelligent design, i thought was a hypothesis about the creation of the universe. I think people are confusing intelligent design with creationism. Can someone correct me?
jomastretch 1 week ago
@jomastretch Nobody is confusing the terms, they're just trying to use intelligent design as a new label because creationism gives off a obvious religious vibe. The game is to sound as scientific as you can without actually doing anything scientific, while reaping benefits from modern medicine that depend solely off evolution.
TheDreadedlife 6 days ago 3
@jomastretch ID proponents don't use "reasonable arguments". They've (as you said) only an HYPOTHESIS (=unproven facts), while on the other side there's a SOLID SCIENTIFIC THEORY (= coherent well documented explanation for large amounts of proven facts), and still they claim there's a controversy.
Furthermore, when TRUE scientists explain them why their arguments are flawed, they don't dismiss the argument but keep it for the next audience. Not reasonable nor honest.
FreeSilio 4 days ago
I think I like Steve.
FrankLightheart 3 weeks ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Evolution is as much a fact as gravity. Yet very few deny gravity...
Hornadayfan 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
Comment removed
Hornadayfan 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
What's the music towards the end of the video?
Phamilygem 3 weeks ago
@Phamilygem @Phamilygem The music is listed in the info tab under the video, this is probably THE most common place to find information relating to a video. Simply put forth the effort to look for the answer. Music:
Self-Authored using GarageBand '09 There you have it- Evid3nc3 himself put that little bit of noise together.
btwbrand 3 weeks ago in playlist Conceptual
@btwbrand You're mistaken, he edited and amalgamated a mixture of existing music/instrumentals, he did not 'make' them. However I'm asking for the 'name' of the music towards the end with the violin. There's a difference between remixing the songs and composing them.
Phamilygem 3 weeks ago
@Phamilygem I never implied he "made" the sounds. I simply quoted what he said in the text then reaffirmed "He put that bit of noise together himself" :Implying he strung the sounds together from samples. He has stated numerous times in previous information fields that unless otherwise indicated the compositions of the sounds you hear are his own. Play with a sampling program and you too can combine blimps and pieces of noise into what seems like a straight rip of a recording.
btwbrand 3 weeks ago
Brilliant. Should be required viewing in Kansas.
deanosumo 4 weeks ago
I think teachers maybe should mention 'the controversy' is out there and dispel misconceptions, so a student doesn't find out about 'the controversy' and think it has any validity.
chibiariel 1 month ago
elegant bananas lol
Driscotus 1 month ago in playlist Conceptual
This was beutiful, keep up the good work fellow evolutionist!
RawSwedishMeatball 1 month ago
If evolution doesn't happen, vaccines don't work.
If evolution doesn't happen, why do I have a tailbone and an appendix?
If evolution doesn't happen, why has there been not one piece of theory-killing evidence brought forth in over 250,000 studies of evolutionary biology?
If evolution doesn't happen, why have we directly observed speciation in plants, bacteria, insects, and worms?
I can't believe people still argue about this to bolster their outdated superstitious beliefs.
ChipArgyle 1 month ago 29
@ChipArgyle Well, the appendix seems to have its use in restoring the bacterial flora of your intestines after diarrhea and other problems.
psychoh13 4 days ago
@psychoh13 In the early 1500s, Leonardo Da Vinci opined that the appendix was there to suppress farts so that they didn't rupture the caecum. Research continues into the appendix's use.
Consider this as a replacement for appendix in my list. As the ultimate divinely designed living thing according to the Bible, why does the human being have blind spots in its eyes?
ChipArgyle 3 days ago
@ChipArgyle Because evolution is a bad designer... :P Don't get me wrong, I totally acknowledge evolution as a fact, as a real scientific theory. Unlike piece of crap like ID.
psychoh13 3 days ago
@psychoh13 I know, you were just bringing new information into the old argument about the appendix. I like da Vinci's take on it. So many of the great minds throughout history also had weak thoughts. I just had to throw it in there.
ChipArgyle 2 days ago
What's great about evolution is that the older form is out competed by the new improved version until the older forms go extinct and leave nothing to show they ever existed.
When people deserve to be tortured for their IQ there is NO statement stupid enough to make them sick. When people deserve to be tortured for their IQ statements only need to support their cause.
1:30 “Without [evolution] research in [biology] would not exist.”
I dream of a world after mass extinction.
MrShoeguy 1 month ago 5
@ExuberantlyMorose try the time frame of the earth, as well as global warming.
ikthat121q 1 month ago
@ikthat121q He asked you WHY, too. We know the earth's age is 4.55 billion years with about a 1% error. The oldest rocks we can use various radiometric dating methods on have been dated as being 3.5 billion years old, due to plate tectonics. The rest is known thanks to meteorites. Global warming is a fact since we can measure it, the average temperature has increased allmost 1 degree Celcius since 1880, and it's rising at an increasingly fast rate. It's a well understood phenomenon.
omgwtfbbqxD 1 month ago
I love your videos...very smooth, gliding from point to point logically and easily. Talk about shutting down their whole argument in two and a half minutes! All they could really say after that is "Satan evolved bananas to trick us!" They don't have a leg to stand on.
ExuberantlyMorose 1 month ago
You see that protein at 1.59? It's evidence of Intelligent Pasta.
PRAISE THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER!!!
saguhh00 1 month ago in playlist Conceptual
@foojuice101 Your extreme apparent mislead beliefs on "sound" supporting evolutionary facts is most disconcerting. @lethalsub Contrary to your openly displayed belief- many "scientific" books are riddled with theories that stray from the truth.
ikthat121q 1 month ago
@ikthat121q By the way, this isn't allowed. You can't just state that science is "riddled with mistruth" and expect to get away with it. Care to show us a specific example of one such widely held belief, and why it isn't true? I would be astounded if you could.
ExuberantlyMorose 1 month ago
The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, not on the one rejecting it. Disbelief is the default position.
Now, Creationists and Evolutionists are both making claims: Creationists say that biblical things happened, and Evolutionists say that evolution happened.
Both groups have to provide skeptics with sound evidence that supports their claims. The difference between Evolutionists and Creationists is that Evolutionists have sound, scientific evidence supporting evolution.
foojuice101 1 month ago
@foojuice101 this point in time, would be nice if creationists actually stopped asking for evidence they can simply google.
PointlessSteel 3 weeks ago
The objective of the creationists is not to provide evidence for their claims, but to muddy the conversation and create doubt. If they can create doubt, they can wedge their ideas into the classroom. They believe what they're doing is moral, and they will NEVER stop trying to kill off views that don't support their own.
dgrhm08 1 month ago
You have a great sense for musical accompaniment.
VetinariClone 1 month ago in playlist Conceptual
100%
Atheist961 2 months ago
I introduced the subject of flat earth because just as evidence led on that the world was flat , ther is now supposed evidence that ther is evolution. Would it not seem likely could be incorrect? Not just flat earth concept?
ikthat121q 3 months ago
@ikthat121q I am not sure where the whole flat earth thing originated. Long, long ago they knew that the earth was round, even long before Ptolemy. The Greeks saw the earth as a sphere, and even had angular calculations based upon the stars movements to prove it mathematically. If anyone ever believed the Earth was flat, then this belief rose from the RELIGIOUS DARK AGES, that long period of highly catholic feudal government, during which knowledge and learning were forsaken for "faith."
ExuberantlyMorose 1 month ago
I have in fact written many papers (some exceeding 20 pages) on such information on boths sides so I do believe I have seen "a spec of it." Unfortunetly controverse to your belief that buffboynick is a minority in his beliefs, many people believe that just like scientists were sure the earth was flat, and scientists were sure the sun revolved around the earth, that this belief in a evolution of the world is such a similar belief. The
ikthat121q 3 months ago
@ikthat121q Messages or comments. Not both. Here's a short reply.
About the "once believed the flat earth", yes, in the 1st milenium, most intelligent people agreed that the world was flat, but at least that's what the evidence was pointing to at the time. Now, even if evolution isn't true, it's what's the evidence is currently pointing to, a fact buffboynick cannot get into his head properly.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
I do in fact believe this is you. You say that from your standpoint yes, but as you encouraged buffboynick and the others, from the countless millions and millions who believe there is a higher power(s) -it would seem to not believe in a higher power is simply laughable- Evidense that could be looked at both ways- you are simply looking at it one such way.
ikthat121q 3 months ago
Now would be the time to reach for small opportunity to bring your self to the level the rest of us here stand, by admitting you are so very incorrect. Evolution is a theory no? Point proven.
ikthat121q 3 months ago
@anticorncob6 Your obscene language neither furthers this conversation nor aids your mislead points you are attempting to make. It simply suggest a comming realization of your incorrect stance or a severe lack of maturity.
ikthat121q 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Macroevolution, wikipedia:
"Contrary to this belief among the anti-evolution movement proponents, evolution of life forms beyond the species level ("macroevolution", i.e. speciation in a specific case) has indeed been observed multiple times under both controlled laboratory conditions and in nature.[12] The claim that macroevolution does not occur, or is impossible, is thus demonstrably false and without support in the scientific community."
THERE YOU GO FAGGOTS, EVOLUTION, 100% OBSERVED.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Did you check the source on that comment evo-clown?
Its from Evolutionist Website Talk Origins__FACT
That means it has ZERO credibility. Nice biased info there ape-man believer. There is ZERO evidence of Macroevolution__FACT. Its UNobserved both in the fossil record and in current observation.
Try reading some peer reviewed literature from REAL Biologists like Dr. Gordon C Mills. You got PWNED 100%!!! lol
buffboynick 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Citing an entry from Talk Origins on Wikipedia is not "evidence" kid.
Rather sad that you didnt know that Talk Origins is a known EVOLUTIONIST website__FACT
How bout you goto True Origin (dot) org to see some REAL science. They totally refute Talk origins and their debunked anti-science. The average evolutionist has an extremely LOW IQ
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick YOU'RE A COMPLETE IDIOT, I CANNOT DESCRIBE HOW IGNORANT YOU ARE... I'LL JUST LET YOU GET THE LAST WORD
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Try listening to REAL Biologists for a change (like Dr. Francis Crick, Dr. Gordon C. Mills, and Dr. Jonathan Wells)
Now that we know evolution is the equivalent of Flat Earth Theory.....that means only 2 options are left.
Aliens or God. Or some kind of weird combo of both.
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick Okay, quit replying! You obviously do not understand our side. I've decided debating you is pointless and you're too ignorant to truly engage. I can refute everything you say, but you're not going to listen. So please stop replying! I get it- you haven't seen the evidence and you're now claiming it's not there. Just stop!
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
You stop replying BOY.
Your ignorance is astounding.
Traditional Darwinian evolution has consistently been DISPROVEN. That is why many scientists (like Dr. Rhawn Joseph and Dr. Michael Denton) have come up with their own new kinds of "evolution".
The New Evolutionary theories make far more sense (even though they arent as good as Directed Panspermia and Intervention Theory).
Darwin had NO DEGREE in BIOLOGY__FACT. His writings are also VERY racist!!!. Now, GTFO!!
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick *sigh* I hope someday people like you will actually understand our side...
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
That's like asking me to "understand" Flat Earth Theory.
I'm not into outdated, obsolete, pseudo-science like "evolution magic". Its NOT science, never has been. Darwin had no degree in Biology and was a vile racist__FACT.
What's even worse.....was that he belonged to a Masonic order (The Rosicrucians)
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick If you truly did understand our side you would know we really do have a lot of evidence. I'm sorry, but if it's the 21st century and you still don't believe in evolution, you are plain stupid. Poor cock smoker buffboynick thinks it's the other way around.
You believe so fucking strongly we're the ones that are wrong you won't even bother to see our arguments. Get an education.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Actually you dont.
The most evidence is the 3rd option (Directed Panspermia and Intervention Theory)
That's why UFOs are always making the news. They conduct genetic engineering, terraforming, and life-transplantation experiments. You have no education.
You have no knowledge of biology, human genetics, and real science. Macroevolution and abiogenesis is the RELIGION of naturalism. You are MORE "religious" then Creationists. You dont even have a high school diploma__FACT
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick "You have no knowledge of biology, human genetics, and real science."
With that said even after I explained to you that I do, I have come to conclusion that you will only ignore what I have to say and strawman and lie. Shall I bother to pick apart more of your responses, I don't know.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@buffboynick "You have no knowledge of biology, human genetics, and real science." Er, why can't you answer my physics questions, fraud?
lethalsub 1 month ago
@anticorncob6
As soon as any evotard finds the mythical "ape-man shared ancestor" or explains The Cambrian Explosion, Living Fossils, and the fact that information (DNA Code) demands a SOURCE and doesnt just magically create itself then people will listen to "evolutionists"
No wonder so many Christians "believe" in evolution.....its another dumb religion of supernatural nonsense.
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick you dont believe in magically created things right? me too. by the way god created everything from nothing dont you remember? from nothing he created light. from nothing he created plants animals. from nothing he created dirt and thats what man is made of.
princerexor 2 months ago
@princerexor Actually the original hebrew word used in those instances means "create from already existing material".
It means you're wrong in what you said, but it also means god didn't exist outside of time and space as theists often would say.
sapunec7854 2 months ago
@sapunec7854 to understand the true meaning of the bible one must learn hebrew. why people read an english bible or a bible translated to modern day languages we need hebrew bible man.. hahahaha
princerexor 2 months ago
@princerexor It makes even less sense then - there are "godS" all around the place, Jesus is not a messiah of any sorts, the ten commandments become something completely different & so on & so forth
sapunec7854 2 months ago
@sapunec7854 Jesus is not a messiah of any sorts (hes just a very naughty boy) xD
Yahweigh 2 months ago
@princerexor English is the most wide spread language.
Hebrew is... almost nil.
godfail
Yahweigh 2 months ago
@buffboynick Er, evolution does have an explanation for living fossils, retard.
lethalsub 1 month ago
@buffboynick "Darwin had NO DEGREE in BIOLOGY__FACT. His writings are also VERY racist!!!. Now, GTFO!!" You call Darwin a racist, then you make fun of someone saying 'maths'.
Try and figure it out you yellow cunt.
lethalsub 1 month ago
EVOLUTION REALLY HAPPENED GET THE FUCK OVER IT.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evolutionism has NEVER been actual science.
Its a well documented FRAUD. Evolutionists have staged Numerous Hoaxes (like Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man)
The Facial Eye Characteristics of Asian Humans are found NOWHERE in the animal kingdom__FACT
Not one brain dead ev-LIE-utionist has EVER logically explained Asian Eyes using "evolution". There is no "evolutionary explanation", only a Genetic Engineering explanation. Evolution is more RELIGION than science.
evoTARDSareINSANE 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evoTARDSareINSANE "Evolutionism has NEVER been actual science."
WRONG
"The Facial Eye Characteristics of Asian Humans are found NOWHERE in the animal kingdom"
STRAWMAN
" There is no "evolutionary explanation""
WRONG
"Evolution is more RELIGION than science"
WRONG
anticorncob6 3 months ago
anyone else notice Bo Burnhams - Catholic Rant as the music in the background?
LadyOpenshaw 3 months ago
Evo-religious straw man arguments, arguments from authority, and erroneous speculation all wrapped up in one little video.
Epic FAIL!!
The majority of scientists accept OBSERVED variations (which is often mistakenly called "microevolution" by evolutionists).
The majority does not accept macroevolution and abiogenesis because there is no observed evidence to support them
Example in the video (wolves to dogs) both are in the Canine Family (micro, not macro). Explain Bat origin Mr. evolutionist
evoTARDSareINSANE 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evoTARDSareINSANE "The majority does not accept macroevolution"
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? DID YOU PAY ANY FUCKING ATTENTION WHEN THIS GUY TALKED ABOUT PROEJCT STEVE? YOU CLAIM THAT LOADS OF SCIENTISTS ARE CREATIONISTS, DEBUNKED, NO STRAWMAN THERE.
YOU THUMBS UP YOUR OWN COMMENTS, WHAT A FUCKING LOSER.
IF YOU WANT BAT ORIGINS OR ANYTHING ELSE, LOOK IT UP BEFORE USING IT AS EVIDENCE OF YOUR SHITTY BELIFS.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Look kids, its evo-TROLL CornCob up his butt.
No kid, the majority only accepts OBSERVED variations of color and size within species over time (often called microevolution).
They dont accept the delusional and UNOBSERVED fantasy of abiogenesis and macroevolutionary transitions. In fact.....there is not even one Peer-Reviwed experiment showing a single-celled organism become multicellular__FACT
Oh how embarrassing how you lying evoTARDS get OWNED with those pesky FACTS ;)
evoTARDSareINSANE 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evoTARDSareINSANE "They dont accept the delusional and UNOBSERVED fantasy of abiogenesis and macroevolutionary transitions."
BOLD-FACED LIE
AS FOR THE ABIOGENSIS THING... NICE STRAWMAN ATTEMPT, BUT LAME
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Name on "peer reviewed" scientific article supporting macroevolution
Macroevolution (also called "transmutation") is UNobserved in nature and in lab experiments__FACT
Only "scientists" that engage in erroneous SPECULATION "believe" in macroevolution. Both Bats and the Platypus refute evolution.
Other species (such as the Venus Flytrap Plant and Sea Lions) also dismantle you little evo-MYTH. Sea Lions were created through genetic engineering (mixing Dolphin DNA and Canine DNA)
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "Macroevolution (also called "transmutation") is UNobserved in nature and in lab experiments"
WRONG, EVOLUTION HAS BEEN OBSERVED, WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO.
"Only "scientists" that engage in erroneous SPECULATION "believe" in macroevolution"
WRONG
NONE OF WHAT YOU SAID DISPROVES EVOLUTION, YOUR SHITTY BRAIN THINKS IT DOES.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
You got OWNED on Bat Origins (just like I consistently OWN you on other videos)
Scientists with PHD degrees (unlike YOU) that dont believe in ev-LIE-ution and have videos on here,
Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Paul Nelson, Dr. Michael Denton, Dr. David Menton, Dr. Ian Macreadie, Dr. Ann Gauger, Dr. Michael Behe, Dr. John Sanford, Dr. Jonathan Safarti, and Dr. Stephen Meyer
The Blue Website Link on my page will shows the 20 page LONG list of scientists that dont believe in evolution
evoTARDSareINSANE 3 months ago
@evoTARDSareINSANE
"Anti-science McCob for brains" just repeatedly lies on videos and spreads utter stupidity.
That sad kid is full of straw man arguments, arguments from authority, and other evo-religious nonsense used by pseudo-science evo-trolls
He got intellectually-SPANKED by you and others on Youtube. Excellent Job exposing that clown.
DisprovingEvolution 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DisprovingEvolution YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT, YOU'RE THE ONE WITH AT LEAST THREE SOCK PUPPET ACCOUNTS, MAKING STRAWMAN ARGUMENTS, AND LITERALLY LYING TO SUPPORT YOUR SHITTY BELIEFS.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@evoTARDSareINSANE "You got OWNED on Bat Origins"
WRONG
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Further DESTROYING you is the FACT that the facial eye characteristics of Asian Humans ONLY exist in them and NOWHERE in the animal kingdom__FACT
I want to hear one brainless evotard like you explain the "evolutionary adaptation" that explains Asian Eyes!!!
You got owned so hard that I am going to make an example out of you kid. You're getting humiliated hard!!!
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "I want to hear one brainless evotard like you explain the "evolutionary adaptation" that explains Asian Eyes!!!"
YOU FUCKING IDIOT, THEY STAY IN THE SUN, HUMANS ARE DIFFERENT FROM OTHER ANIMALS.
NOTHING YOU SAY DISPROVES EVOLUTION, READ A BOOK, IF YOU ACTUALLY UNDERSTOOD OUR SIDE YOU WOULD KNOW THAT WE'RE THE ONES THAT ARE RIGHT, BUT YOU FUCKASSES DON'T GET IT.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
BBN is 100% correct you delusional little TROLL kid.
There is no logical evolutionary explanation for the facial eye characteristics of Asian Homo Sapiens and that is a fact.
If you "think" sunlight magically caused Asian eyes to "evolve' like that then you are more IGNORANT than previously thought. There is more sunlight (and HEAT) in Africa and the Middle East then Asia__FACT
Plus whites live in Asia too (Russia). You're such an ANTI-Science evotard its laughable!! LOL
DisprovingEvolution 3 months ago
@DisprovingEvolution
Ouch! Man you destroyed that sad little evo-boy so bad that its painful to watch LOL.
No wonder he has to troll videos spewing LIES and anti-science garbage.
These evo-nutjobs "believe" a magical UNFOUND ape-man "shared ancestor" caused the polar opposite (and contradictory) "evolution" of both chimpanzees and early humans!! And that his magical mutations caused BOTH SEXES to gain the same macroevolutionary genetic traits! haha!!
That's NOT science, its evo-RELIGION.
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "he has to troll videos spewing LIES and anti-science garbage"
WRONG
"mutations caused BOTH SEXES to gain the same macroevolutionary genetic traits"
HOLY FUCK YOU ARE A MORON, DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW EVOLUTION WORKS? DO YOU FUCKING THING IT WOULD BE SUCCESSFUL FOR A MORE EVOLVED WOMAN TO MARRY A LESS EVOLVED MAN?
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
You missed the point DUMBASS!
In order for a TRULY NEW species to produce more of its kind than it would need an opposite sex counterpart (with the same NEW genetic traits) to reproduce with to ensure they both can produce more of their NEW kind.
That is why SCIENCE PROVED we did not come from Neanderthals
As an example, if a "Neo-Sapien" was born tomorrow from a Homo Sapien, it would need another of its own kind to ensure it could make more Neo-Sapiens. You got ow, ow, OWNED!
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick
Great Comment. You're making this kid the laughing stock on here!! lol
These little evotards literally "believe" an unfound ape-man shared ancestor spawned both Chimpanzees and early humans!! Nuts!
That's more RELIGION than science. Its also mentally insane! These evo-nutjobs belong in a mental hospital. Thanks for the reality check, you're doing a better job educating this kid then his own parents ever did haha.
DisprovingEvolution 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick I *NEVER* GET OWNED, YOU'RE JUST A RETARD THAT THINKS I DO.
"SCIENCE PROVED we did not come from Neanderthals"
WRONG
AND WHAT YOU SAID ONLY SHOWS YOU HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA HOW EVOLUTION WORKS.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
WRONG
Science proved we DID NOT come from Neanderthals__FACT (that's accepted by evolutionists as well)
Evolutionists theorize that Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals "share an ancestor". They PROVED we did not come directly from Neanderthals dumbass__FACT
The THEORY is that Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals diverged in lineage from Homo Heidelbergensis or Homo Erectus. That theory is even less plausible, since we are LESS genetically similar to those 2 hominids.
PWNED again moron!!
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick I NEVER GOT POWNED YOU FUCKHEAD, I AM NOT A MORON, YOU ARE,
"The THEORY is that Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals diverged in lineage from Homo Heidelbergensis or Homo Erectus. That theory is even less plausible"
NO MORE STRAWMEN OR CLAIMING FALSE VICTORY OKAY?
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
You got caught LYING (like most evolutionists do)
Even evotards admit Homo Sapiens didnt come from Neanderthals__FACT
Even Richard Dawkins said that. You got PWNED hard kid!!! haha
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DisprovingEvolution "There is no logical evolutionary explanation for the facial eye characteristics of Asian Homo Sapiens"
WRONG
"Plus whites live in Asia too (Russia)."
MORE STRAWMEN, NICE TO SEE WHAT RETARDS HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6 = evotard
Looks like the little school boy is angry that his INEPT arguments are consistently dismantled with FACTS and peer reviewed evidence.
Believing in evolution in 2011 is the equivalent of believing in FLAT EARTH THEORY
Its an outdated, disproven, and ignorant theory and you just got schooled with REAL science. Us Homo Sapiens 1st appeared 200,000 years ago (some scientists say 400,000) and we are STILL Homo Sapiens today__FACT
OWNED!
evoTARDSareINSANE 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evoTARDSareINSANE "Believing in evolution in 2011 is the equivalent of believing in FLAT EARTH THEORY"
WRONG YOU FUCKHEAD, TO *NOT* BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION IN 2011 IS TO BELEIVE IN A FLAT EARTH. WE REALLY DO HAVE A LOT OF EVIDENCE, BUT RETARDED FUCKS LIKE YOU LIE. WE'VE ALREADY PROVEN EVOLUTION, BUT YOU DIPSHITS STILL DON'T ACCEPT IT.
"Us Homo Sapiens 1st appeared 200,000 years ago (some scientists say 400,000) and we are STILL Homo Sapiens today"
ANOTHER STRAWMAN... NICE ONE FUCKASS
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Rather hilarious that you accuse others of having "sock accounts" when you have 2 that I know of Rubik's cube BOY lol.
How bout you stick to math and refrain from spewing faslehoods about Biology (a topic you clearly know NOTHING about)
My channel has so many links to scientists refuting evolution and peer reviewed scientific papers refuting evolution that its overwhelming. You got PWNED by non creationists like BBN and by Old Earth Creationists like me and ETAI. Butthurt?
DisprovingEvolution 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DisprovingEvolution AT LEAST I DON'T USE MY OTHER ACCOUNTS TO TROLL PEOPLE AND SHIT ON PEOPLE
I KNOW A LOT OF BIOLOGY, BUT NO MATTER WHAT I SAY, YOU'LL REFUSE TO ACCEPT ANYTHING.
YOUR CLOSED-MINDED SHIT4BRAINS HEAD HAS ALREADY MADE UP IT'S MIND.
THERE ARE 300,000 REVIEWED PAPERS BY ACTUAL SCIENTISTS SUPPORTING EVOLUTION... EVEN IF YOU'RE RIGHT YOU'RE NOWHERE NEAR 300,000 YET.
GO DIE RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6 = marked as SPAM
you're also so ignorant its laughable ;)
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick YOU'RE THE ONES WHO ARE VOTING UP YOUR OWN COMMENTS FAGGOT
anticorncob6 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick YOU'RE THE ONE THAT'S IGNORANT FAGGOT.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6 = has a butthurt because he got PWNED with REAL science
Take your brainwashed UNscientific evo-religious crap elsewhere
DisprovingEvolution 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
This sad kid clearly has ZERO understanding of Biology or Genetics and you (and this video) have been REFUTED by science numerous times.
The examples of "evolution" in this video are often called "microevolution" (that's variations in color and size within family classifications)
Macroevolution has NEVER been observed__FACT. Macro is one kind becoming an entirely different kind. That would be reptile to bird, amphibian to mammal, etc. You got PWNED hard dumbass
evoTARDSareINSANE 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evoTARDSareINSANE "This sad kid clearly has ZERO understanding of Biology or Genetics"
WRONG
"The examples of "evolution" in this video are often called "microevolution""
WRONG
"Macroevolution has NEVER been observed"
WRONG
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Macroevolution is a RELIGION kid. Its UNOBSERVED, erroneous speculation and junk science.
Microevolution (poor name, since its not actually "evolution") actually refutes macroevolution.
If you have the blue print to build a car, you cant build a space shuttle. This a metaphor for the DNA CODE BARRIER. Try actually reading a book you moronic "ape-man believing" TWIT!!!
The DNA Code Barrier prevents macroevolution from being possible!!! Bugs make bugs, humans make humans!
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO FOR OBSERVED MACROEVOLUTION.
I'VE READ BOOKS ON EVOLUTION, I STILL ACCEPT IT, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO STUDY. ACUTALLY LEARN OUR SIDE AND QUIT IGNORING US AND STRAWMANING US. I'VE LEARNED YOUR SIDE AND I HAVE BEEN FORCED TO CONCLUDE YOU ARE FUCKING IDIOTS.
PERIOD.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
The video discusses Wolves leading to Dogs (BOTH are in the Canine family, and so are foxes and coyotes dumbass)
Then it talks about Broccoli and Cauliflower (BOTH are vegetable plants)
Those are STRAW MANS retard. Everyone (including Christians, which I am NOT) accept variations in color and size within FAMILY classifications (often called Microevolution)
What's NOT accepted (by anyone with a brain) is Macroevolution.
Living Fossils and Genetics REFUTE Macroevolutiion__FACT
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT MACROEVOLUTION AND MICROEVOLUTION MEAN?
LEARN SOME SHIT BEFORE STATING THINGS AS FACT.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Micro = variations of color and size within family classifications that occur due to DNA recombination in reproduction and mutations
Macro = UNPROVEN bullshit where one kind of organism becomes and entirely new type of organism over long periods of time
Macro is REFUTED and DISPROVED by Genetics and Living Fossils__FACT
Macro has NEVER been observed. Its erroneous speculation by members of the evo-RELIGION
buffboynick 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
I read books too, here are some I recommend for your brainwashed evo-TARD ass.....
"Refuting Dawkins, The Greatest Hoax on Earth" by Dr. Jonathan Safarti
"Evolution : A Theory in Crisis" by Dr. Michael Denton
"Darwinism Exposed : Evolution is Wrong" by Dr. Anthony Latham
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick LOOK AT IT AT AN UNBIASED VIEW.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
I have idiot.
I've listened to Gould, Dawkins, PZ Meyers, and Joyce (all are evolutionists)
Then compared them to REAL scientists like Wells, Denton, Menton, Crick, Berlinski, Meyer, Safarti, Sanford, and billions of other non-evolutionist scientists!!!
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "I have"
WRONG
GOULD, DAWKINS, PZ, ALL THOSE ARE ACTUAL SCIENTISTS AND DENYING IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT.
YOU LISTENED TO MORE CREATARD SCIENTISTS THAN SMART, EVOLUTIONARY SCIENTISTS.
YES YOU ARE A BIASED PERSON.
NO UNBIASED PERSON COULD REJECT EVOLUTION.
INCLUDING YOU.
YOU'RE TOO FUCKING STUPID FOR A GOOD CONVERSATION, I AM NOT AN IDIOT, YOU ARE AND THAT'S A FACT.
GO KILL YOURSELF.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Look kids, little evo-boy "cherry picks" the scientists he listens to haha!
Number 1...evolutionist "scientists" arent REAL scientists
Number 2....evolution is the most FAILED, outdated, obsolete, and discredited theory to ever be thought up. There is no logic or observation of macroevolution or abiogenesis
Even the Molecular Biologist that discovered DNA (Dr. Francis Crick) said it would be impossible for DNA to have come by chance__FACT. So he theorized "Directed Panspermia"
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick BOTH NUMBER 1 AND NUMBER 2 ARE WRONG. THANKS FOR PROVING YOU KNOW NOTHING AGAIN.
"the Molecular Biologist that discovered DNA (Dr. Francis Crick) said it would be impossible for DNA to have come by chance"
ONLY A MINORITY OF BIOLOGISTS BELEIVE THAT
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
WRONG
Most Biologists do NOT endorse abiogenesis because there is ZERO evidence to support it.
In fact.....Dr. Gordon C Mills wrote an excellent peer-reviewed article refuting the RNA World Hypothesis.
Even non-creationists like Dr. Francis Crick didnt believe in it. That's why he said aliens seeded this planet (Directed Panspermia)
buffboynick 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Its shocking how incredibly ignorant you are about the subject of Biology/Genetics.
I suggest you read some Peer Reviewed Publications from REAL scientists like Biologist Dr. Gordon C. Mills.
The non-evolutionist scientists consistently dismantle the fraudulent LIES used by evo-pseudo-scientists. That's why frauds like you stage evo-HOAXES like Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man. Tsk, tsk.
evoTARDSareINSANE 3 months ago
@evoTARDSareINSANE YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR SIDE. I'VE BEEN TO LOTS OF CREATIONIST PLACES AND SAW PRESENTATIONS FROM CREATARD SCIENTISTS... I KNOW YOUR SIDE AND NOT IN AN ENTIRE BOOK CAN I DESCRIBE HOW STUPID IT IS TO NOT ACCEPT EVOLUTION.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Its rather hilarious how many times I have DESTROYED your sad, little evo-delusions on here. Tsk, Tsk.
I recommend you get a high school education before you run off at the mouth kid. You havent even completed middle school yet and you're trying to refute the work of REAL PHD BIOLOGISTS like Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Michael Denton, Dr. Gordon C Mills, Dr. Paul Nelson, Dr. John Sanford, Dr. Stephen Meyer, and Dr William Dembski.
I take THEIR real science over your evo-delusion!
buffboynick 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Also, you sad little kid......
Not everyone that doesnt believe in your RELIGION of evolutionism is a "creationist"
I am a REALIST and truth-seeker. I am not a Creationist, since I belong to no organized religion (unlike you).
Anyone with a brain (which you LACK) would have noticed I subscribe to Directed Panspermia Theory and Intervention Theory (Alien Genetic Engineering)
Creationists dont believe in "aliens" you ignorant little TWIT. Wow you're uneducated. Tsk, tsk
buffboynick 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Evolution in a NUTshell (pardon the pun lol)
"Early Humans and Chimpanzees both diverged in lineage from an ape-like shared ancestor"
That ^ is seriously what evo-clowns believe haha!!!!
If that's not "religious" then I dont know what is. All religions suck!! I prefer the truth!! Genetic Engineering and Directed Panspermia by advanced races (we are an experiment)
Not to mention.....government insider testimony confirms it. Homo Sapiens = Genetically engineered experiment
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick RELIGION IS BELIEF IN THE SUPERNATURAL, IT DOESN'T TAKE MAGIC FOR EVOLUTION TO HAPPEN.
IT IS NOT A RELIGION.
"I prefer the truth!!"
TOO BAD FOR YOU SINCE WHAT YOU ACCEPT AS THE TRUTH IS NOT ACTUALLY THE TRUTH.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
And too bad for you that Chromosome 2 Fusion is a tell-tale sign of genetic engineering (among other signs in the human genome)
Evolution IS belief in the supernatural. Its BELIEF in UNFOUND "ape-men shared ancestors" that caused the polar opposite (contradictory) progression of Chimpanzees and humans!!!
Its "belief" in UNOBSERVED mutations that can magically add large amounts of NEW information to BOTH SEXES of a species genome causing radical transformations. U = HYPOCRITE
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "Evolution IS belief in the supernatural"
WRONG
EVOLUTION DOES NOT REQUIRE MAGIC TO WORK YOU DUMB ASS FUCKTARD.
"Its "belief" in UNOBSERVED mutations that can magically add large amounts of NEW information"
IT HAS BEEN OBSERVED AND MUTATIONS ALLOW FOR NEW INFORMATION TO BE ADDED. I ALREADY EXPLAINED THE BOTH SEXES THING, BUT YOU CREATIONIST FUCKS IGNORE WHAT I SAY.
YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT. YOU'RE SO IGNORANT.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
Straw Mans
Mutations NEVER add large amounts of NEW information__FACT
The ONLY mutations that have been "claimed" to be beneficial are antibiotic resistance in bacteria and HIV immunity in some humans__FACT. And BOTH have been discredited since it was actually gene depletion that caused both of those "beneficial mutations"
As for mutations adding LARGE amounts of New info (unobserved FANTASY). This is why Bats and the Platypus both have no evolutionary explanation.
U = PWNED!
buffboynick 3 months ago
@buffboynick YOU CLEARLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT A STRAWMAN IS.
"Mutations NEVER add large amounts of NEW information"... AT ONE TIME
AND THE REST ABOUT NOT BEING OBSERVED... THE STRAWMAN I'VE POINTED OUT FIVE TIMES ALREADY...
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
The only one getting "debunked" here is you and your RELIGION of evolutionism kid
Link 10 on my channel (and evoTARDSareINSANE's channel) is to all the PEER-REVIEWED journals supporting intelligent design and refuting evolutionism__FACT
Peer Reviewed Journals from Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Stephen Meyer, Dr. William Dembski, Dr. Michael Behe, and Dr. Michael Denton__FACT. I encourage all to view my channel and click on Link 10 and expose this LYING clown "anti-science-cob"
DisprovingEvolution 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DisprovingEvolution SOCK PUPPET ACCOUNT, FUCK YOU, BLOCKED.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evoTARDSareINSANE MAJORITY OF SCIENTISTS ACCEPT EVOLUTION, THANKS FOR PROVING YOU HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO LYING.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
Prove that evolution is true- isn't that a reasonable request?
ikthat121q 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ikthat121q There are 300,000 peer reviewed papers for the existence of evolution. Want proof (or good evidence), read some of them.
There are approximately 0 peer reviewed papers against evolution. There is currently zero scientifically verifiable evidence against the theory, and if there is any such evidence, it will win the noble prize.
I think you're the ones that need to prove your position.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
What a sad little liar. Glad these dudes on here are PWNING you with real science and actual facts
There are numerous peer reviewed journals, articles, and books refuting evolution. Easy to find online. Took me 2 seconds to find them
You're just a hypocritical "ape-man believing" evotard that has faith in unobserved mutations that can magically defy DNA and miraculously add large amounts of information to both sexes (LOL) of a pre-existing species. Total BS and you know it
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick GOT NEWS FOR YOU buffboynick COCK SMOKER
"There are numerous peer reviewed journals, articles, and books refuting evolution."
.
ANOTHER LIE INVENTED BY FUCKHEADS LIKE YOU.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@anticorncob6
You got owned about 20 comments ago.
Both DisprovingEvolution and evoTARDSareINSANE just bent you over and gave you the business like the sniveling little bitch you are, hahahahah!!!
Link 10 on their Channels goes directly to the Discovery Institute's list of PEER REVIEWED PUBLISHED Scientific Journals REFUTING evolution and showing OBVIOUS evidence for Design__FACT
You got PWNED hard you sad, little evo LIAR!!! lol
buffboynick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick WRONG, YOU *NEVER* OWNED ME, YOU IGNORE WHAT I SAY AND STRAWMAN US... THANKS FOR PROVING YOU KNOW NOTHING.
anticorncob6 3 months ago
@joshmonster94 are you aware that evolution is in fact a THEORY?
ikthat121q 3 months ago
You all are going to regret your position on this when Jesus returns
CountryJukebox56 3 months ago
@CountryJukebox56
Prove Jesus and your God existed and we'll give up our position, it's a reasonable request, isn't it?
joshmonster94 3 months ago in playlist More videos from Evid3nc3
@CountryJukebox56 why?
What would Jesus do?
LadyOpenshaw 3 months ago
Gods are created by man.
straneb 3 months ago
Fucking beautiful. Made me laugh out loud cos it was so eleganty said. BAM. love it.
TheMattcs 3 months ago
One problem, none of your examples of evolution (dogs, bananas etc.) involve random mutation, which is the real controversy. Also, can we possibly get past the idea that if you don't agree 100% with a scientist from the 19th century then you are a bone-chucking creationist tool (99% of intelligent design advocates)?
Iain0408 3 months ago
who freaking cares? just ignore these people. believe what you want . it doesn't matter. lover your neighbor BITCH, that's it.
ihventura 3 months ago
@ihventura Your neighbour is Charles Manson and you are Roman Polanski. What did you say ?
Voxnulla 3 months ago
one sided is easy!
freddiesace 3 months ago
GO Steve !
CaptainGreen2008 3 months ago in playlist More videos from Evid3nc3
My name is Steve, and I support evolution and Evid3nc3
Aethgeir 4 months ago
I see the vast universe as the beginning of science exploration in the same way you see the end of creation. I see the bible as nothing more than a fiction in the same way you see the all knowing god's written word.
h2321 4 months ago
Here's a simple question to this oft repeated claim. Why in the world would biology suddenly fall apart if evolution were removed? Nope, all research is being wrapped up, we're not doing this anymore, evolution is wrong. And if you really believe that, doesn't it make it all the more imperative that evolution not be questioned or disproven? Why biology would cease to exist if we did that, and we can't make that sort of sacrifice, so we will never question evolution.
Sickopath333 4 months ago
@Sickopath333 We question the details of the theory of evolution every day. The theory is rock solid and overwhelmingly supported by evidence.
It's amazing that so many people still believe anything in a book that begins with an invisible wizard making things appear out of nowhere by magical means.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
@ndrthrdr1 You didn't even answer my assertion. If people really believe that biology is so intertwined with evolution that you would kill biology if you removed evolution (slight paraphrase on this video's word usage) doesn't that make it necessary to protect the theory at any cost?
It's amazing that so many people still believe anything in a book that has the word science on the cover, accepting it blindly as unquestionable fact, never questioning its assertions or claims.
Sickopath333 4 months ago
@Sickopath333
wht do you think peoplere doing? I mean, have you HEARD of the Dover VS Kitzmiller trial?
NUTCASE71733 4 months ago
I am an atheist i don't think intelligent design should be in school but if it was it would be so easy to pass the tests every answer would be god did it.
arandomatheist 4 months ago
Some great points. It's sad that actual scientists would sign a list against evolution. Science is suppose to be unbiased, yet creationist videos and sites are pretty biased and ignore evidence of the other side. It's also sad how creationists like TruthIsLife7 and tetrahydroscope reply to so many evolution comments sprouting their nonsense and clog up the comments section. Thank goodness this doesn't happen on most videos that DON'T mention the controversy, trying to educate innocent children.
anticorncob6 4 months ago
god, i love being a non-religious person
Leviiify 4 months ago
Comment removed
Leviiify 4 months ago
@xxyodiexx First of all, the video is not trying to convert you to anything; it was just trying to tell you that Evolution is not a controversy, rather Creationism is. Second of all, evidences from history have shown that the established religions have done more harms than good for the human race; therefore the world would be much better without them.
midsummerssun 5 months ago 2
Read Fingerprints of God by Barbara Hagerty.
johnnynicko 5 months ago
Read Fingerprints of God by Barbara Hagerty.
johnnynicko 5 months ago
I don't get the point of the video. I know why, as a christian, I would like to convert people to Christianity. But, as an atheist, what is the motivation? To tell all the Christians they're wrong? If people are happy being spiritual, what does it matter? No one has the real answer. I'm not going to sit here and say I'm right and you're wrong, cause honestly...no one can prove that. So, what's the point? Just let people be happy...even if you think they're idiots ;)
xxyodiexx 5 months ago
@xxyodiexx religion is a cancer especialy if you try to run the govenment or pay off political members to have prayer in school,or hate gays,or pray to god for wars,or kill in the name of your god,or pray for rain,or start wars like bush,think your view is the only way to see something...think the bible is some kind of moral code.yes all religion is a virus that needs to be wipe out.you can start by rebooting your brain.
MrEnlightenup 5 months ago 2
@xxyodiexx i think everything was just proven in this video.
Leviiify 4 months ago
@xxyodiexx The motivation is to open minds and present more evidence towards evolution then your precious faith
KeySour 4 months ago
@xxyodiexx Religion =/= happiness. Religion tells you hell is waiting if you did the wrong things. Religion imposes idealistic moral on people yet itself is corrupted(oh child molesting popes!). Religion constantly demands offering from both mental, spiritual and in physical(money) forms. Religion hates unknowns, non-fiction, science, gay people,...etc.
I see a happy gay couple in the same way you see a pair of abominations.
h2321 4 months ago
@xxyodiexx same could be said about pushing the teaching of creationism in schools.. it would be a huge step backwards for the entire public school system especially in this day and age when already our species are messing with DNA structures to create new products.
intercitty 3 months ago
@97yesterday well isn't youdtube great? a moron like you can write complete nonsense and get away with it.
topperheartramada 5 months ago
STEVE!!!!!!
Unit1262 5 months ago 2
religion should be respected, creationism should not
gogolplex74 5 months ago