Added: 2 months ago
From: graaaaaagh
Views: 778
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • from 2:44 onward this video becomes a masterpiece.

  • cranks used to be institutionalized ... all those buildings now derelict ... everybody has an account to pour pressure relief hearsongs onto and into thinking it will balloon beyond the mirrormaze and being celebrated will be matter of course and just deserts. I keep a collection of idiot savants and all their matrices don't amount to a single screen worth a damn let alone a classification house and a rocky death to life squeezer.

  • schiff never said we'd end up with hyperinflation although that was a remote possibility. just b/c some1 mentions the word hyperinflation doesn't mean they are calling for it imminently or at all.

  • I don't think "people on the right" are too concerned about social issues anymore.

  • @fringeelements True, they've largely turned into war-loving neocons and semi-libertarian paleocons.

  • @graaaaaagh I don't know about that either. I'd have to see some polling data on what self-described "conservatives" think about the wars.

    I think that social conservatism has been on the backburner for a long time, and that neoconservatism basically flared up and has now burnt out. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's just my perception at this point. I understand the rhetorical use of saying they're both equally bad, so do whatcha gotta do to convince fence-sitters.

  • @fringeelements Older people on the right, are very serious about maintaining Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. They do not care about Welfare, social housing, single moms. Most often, people want changed that will improve their personal lives, other who cares. The funniest aspects of many Right wingers, is that they are against abortions, against subsidies to needy families and pro death penalty.

  • Magnificent video!

  • i have just been blocked by hannibal for asking for a source to back up his assertion peter is an anarcho capitalist. he says his opponents dont give any evidence to back up their claims, despite the fact i sent him a link with a schiff interview in which he described his recent running for state senate as a libertarian republican. it was so gobsmacking i took the unprecedented step of making a video response....

    /watch?v=xI3flYps1WY&feature=e­mail&email=comment_received

  • excellent video

  • @graaaaaagh - Why does your accent keep drifting between Australian and American?

  • @xXMetalMeltdownXx Haha. Clusterfuck accents ftw

  • @graaaaaagh - Have you ever been told or noticed that your accent sounds like an Australian doing an American accent?

  • @xXMetalMeltdownXx Yeah, I've been told a lot of stuff about it. People can't seem to place it, which I find kinda cool. I feel like I don't really sound like I'm "from" anywhere.

    Just noticed you're Aussie btw. Interesting to get your take on it.

    It's really just a mishmosh of the different (mostly American ones - the only early-childhood exposure I got to Australian English was through TV) accents I grew up hearing.

  • I doubt Hannibalbarca is actually interested in debating these things, he blocked me, removed my comments and called me a troll for just correcting him on something that would take 2 mins of research to verify.

  • @crazypants88 same with me, I think he did it with a couple of others as well, he is a dishonest lying piece of shit. He demands that anyone who brings up any little fact contrary to what he presents must provide "citations," while he himself can get many facts wrong while providing no citations for each thing he says

  • @crazypants88 Yeah lol, he's just a crank.

  • @graaaaaagh Make that 'wannabe crank'.

  • @AxiomaticLiberty

    He's removed comments pointing out the differences between the school viz. his beef with the "non-empirical" Misesians vs. Hayekians, vs. unorthodox "empirical-based" Misesians vs. a posteriori Rothbardians.

    Which is ironically hilarious. He's trying to paint them all as unempirical but when empiricism points out the contrary, he rejects it. LOL

  • Haha. Good video. Keep them coming.

  • @zbigniewzapora Thanks man.

  • Holy cow, i hope this goes viral. This will be posted straight to my site. spikednation

  • Win.

  • Peter Schiff doesn't understand excess reserves, therefore economic theory based on logical deduction from principles of human action is fundamentally flawed. It all makes so much sense now.

  • We need nationalistic attitudes or else society will fall apart! WE ARE BORG!

  • @Morrakiu Damn straight we should model our society on the Chilean model

    Qué viva Augusto Pinochet, I am kidding of course though their are arguments for structural nationalism in society. WE ARE SPANISH BORG!

  • We need nationalistic attitudes, or we must fall apart, or we'll have a civil war.

  • @Morrakiu Yes we need to stop anti-racism.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more