Worm Holes
6:59
Added: 2 years ago
From: NewParadigmScience
Views: 58,546
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (182)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @SolidTube911

    It has already been done. The problem with that is, when you send information, past the speed of light; it becomes unusable. Since all the information we send has been built with the speed of light in mind, we haven't found such a way to transfer that information without distorting it.

    Science fiction is becoming reality.

  • agree with Einstein and Michio!

    Time Travel is Possible!

  • Forget it trekkies. Theres no way to break the speed barrier and there NEVER will be. Science dictates the universe and the very thing that exist in all of space, time and the universe itself, NOT science fiction so No warp speed and no USS Enterprise. Hey, atleast u have ur star trek movies and tv shows to go back to.

  • @SolidTube911 its happened in the CERN large hadron collider, so now you look like a twat now dont you

  • not a sort cut in time. in a wormhole there is no energy. that means it's so cold nothing moves. A wormhole is a lack of something. plus once you enter on the other side it would be like hitting water real fast. sound could kill you. heat could kill you. a black hole is not a worm hole. a black hole is liquid frequencies. the frequencies don't form matter or particles of anytime. light wouldn't bounce back.

  • damm science your amazing

  • Existence in itself is the weirdest thing I know, wormholes being held open is not impossible considering existence existing is not impossible

  • 2:15 I pinched one off this morning.

  • I think there is possibility of that stable wormhole is already open somewhere. What we should begin is to search the wormhole.

    When light goes into the one-side mouth of a wormhole, it goes out from another mouth of the wormhole as optical fiber cable.

    this is trustable fact, I think.

    If the specific wave band of light from a star is observed at multiple directions, it would be an evidence that the wormhole does exisit.

  • wow i understood nearly all of that O.O

    a year ago i had no idea what they were talking about.

  • It is so sad that Albert Einstein is no longer with us. There are so many questions to be answered. There are many so called experts that give their opinions, but don't really give satifactory answers to genuine questions about our universe.

    Mr Einstein did not have the technology of today at his disposal, only his mind, but his theoretical answers to complicated questions are far superior to those given by others.

    He really was a unique individual.

  • and if time doesnt exist at all?

  • There just making this shit up

  • But let me get this straight, if you travel through a wormhole, you aren't literally travelling through time because the only thing that is different is the hands on a clock, this doesn't mean it would take you to the future, it would just be like another time zone in the united states or in the world. So mainly the gravitation force on the clock's is what has to do with it, but scientifically speaking the future hasn't been created yet and isn't reachable by modern methods.

  • @XtraDimensiionz no, when they say the clock on the other side tick faster it doesnt mean 2 hours faster or 10 year faster. It means every time 1 year is passed on one side, 2 is passed on the other-side. So when one side is at 2010 AB, the other side is on 4020 AB.

    AB = after big bang

  • @yauyyb That means your theory is completely wrong too, since the big bang never happened.

  • @XtraDimensiionz Very true. These people can try to fill your head with whatever they want to (then call themselves geniouses) since nobody can actually travel to these wormholes to find out for sure. Theories, alone, is not science. Things like this need to be able to be proven for them to actually be science. This is just some wheelchair bound retard with a fancy keyboard trying to call himself a genious.

  • These people are out of their damn minds. This is NOT science what so ever. They CANNOT prove any of this crap. These are only theories.

  • @jasonsps78 Yes,science is about theories; the better the theories, the better the science, and it gets better as it continues.

  • Around 4:40 the word Kodak appears legibly on the roof of one of the buildings for a split second as it's zooming out. I'm hoping it's not subliminal advertising.

  • Is negative matter the same as antimatter?

  • @cjs2964 No, antimatter is matter where the charges are opposite to what is expected. Anti-hydrogen, for example has a positron, which has a negative charge, and an anti-electron, which has a positive charge. Negative matter, is when matter's gravity pushes rather than pulls.

    While antimatter is a proven fact, negative matter is still only theoretical, and yet to be proven.

    Logically such matter should exist,however what is logical and what is fact are sometimes two different stories.

  • @sivadfa Ok thanks.

  • Bermuda triangle is alien worm hole for this planet.

  • Michio Kaku gives this video instant credibility.

  • so....technically could you stay in the present forever?

  • Holy shit!!!

  • I know this was a show does anyone know what show this was on?

  • How will we know where the exit of a wormhole will be? Is it even possible to predict the outcome, or the chances of passing through? And at what speed will you travel through a worm hole? All of those questions have not been answered and will probably not be answered right this second, or during our lifetime.

  • What I dont understand, is when people define worm holes as passage ways through time and space. How exactly could you physically travel through time that is somthing us humens have invented and doesnt exsist? Not trolling just trying to learn if someone could help me out here. Please correct me if I said anything wrong.

  • @blinkfanable

    I believe the concept of time is still debatable. Some believe it is a real structure of the universe, like a dimension, while others believe it is strictly a form of measurement.

  • Negative matter is just bs.

  • This explains Travis Walton's abduction in 1975. In the film, when he returned from his kidnapping, he had a beard AS IF he was gone for years-when he was only gone for 5 days!-suggesting that he was taken far out into space AWAY from a gravitational pull, away from Earth.

  • Guess what, i'm not a scientist or a Sci-Fi Freaks, but i think that, according to Hawking and Einstein theories, even if you could traval throught a worm hoole, it will not worth the effort, because this object is extremly loud, you only will be able to move very very slowly , ROFL

  • headache XD from 3:40 till 4:14 is fked up was understanding thing thing i think..!!

  • Given the fact that a star is a sphere, shining light in all directions from this sphere, radiating outwards, and a Black hole is a collapsed star, should a Black hole suck in matter from all spherical directions into its centre, and not as is always shown, as water flowing down a plug hole. Any star occupies an area of space in 3 dimensions, when it collapses it still occupies that same area, allbeit much smaller and any gravitational effects would be spherical.

  • @elypix and jst how exactly do you propose people sould animate something like that for demonstration purposes i'd like to know.

  • Comment removed

  • wouldn't negative matter be like antimatter?

  • @erab1996

    I like to think of it this way. Matter={1,inf}, Negative matter={-inf,-1}, and Antimatter = 0 in mater terms of course.

  • 0:54 NOPE CHUCK NORRIS CAN BREA AWAY

  • i feel like these visual aids of wormholes are misleading. Wouldn't the extreme levels of gravity of the black holes make distort (for lack of a better word) space? someone please explain

  • to keep the wormhole open all u need is to put a thighmaster in the wormhole.

  • The Doctor: "People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff."

  • @chemicalrage1 it isn't the end of the wormhole that needs to be kept open it's the center. -~- closed in middle open on ends. -=- open in middle and ends. And might have this confused with another video but i believe it says in this video that the middle forms and then pinches closed again. But yes the other side would need to be expanded from a micro-wormhole. Read the book: "how to build a time machine" by (Phil of something that starts with a p)

  • that is blastfumy enything that can go faster then light can escape the pull of a black hole

  • @kobeki2 For one, it is blasphemy, not blasfumy. And if something traveling the speed of light can escape a black hole, why does light not escape a black hole? And nothing can go faster than the speed of light.

  • @CptNagrom well not exactly, there are neutrinos that have been found that go faster than the speed of light. ;s

  • Comment removed

  • to keep one end of a wormhole open wouldnt we need to send a device through it to keep the other side open aswell

  • OMG

  • If nothing can escape a black hole then where does the energy that scientists say black holes eject come from?

  • @iandavidvideo i think the particles that are induced by the crazy amount of gravitational pull heat up and emit radiation kinda like x-rays, so its not exactly the black hole giving off the radiation, but it is the particles that do

  • @iandavidvideo

    The poles of the magnetic field of the accretion disk around the black hole. 

  • "Hugh hugh hugh. He said hole Ugh hugh hugh" -Butthead

  • NO! You're the wormhole

  • i thought that  gravity accelerated time. But here they are saying the opposite... now I am confused

  • Someday, I'll play golf with wormholes.

  • I believe using clocks (atomic or not) to indicate whether time is going faster or slower is a fallacy in itself. While clocks tell time, they do not represent the actual flow of time itself. They are merely instruments for measuring time. If the astronauts claimed that it took them 10 minutes to get to space while ground control claimed 5, where did those 5 minutes go for the astronauts? Did ground control receive a 5 minute delay? Or did those astronauts disappear for 5 minutes?

  • @ahfish85 Neither. You're thinking of time as absolute and rigid, but it's not. It's elastic and stretches differently depending on velocity and gravity. And if EVERY working clock runs slower when it's moving fast then which is more probable, some force fiddles with clocks or time slows? The first was tried in the Ether Theory, which failed to account for observations and was basically the same idea but with an added complication. Time slowing is far simpler and fits the results better.

  • Haha...*sigh* and to think I have lucid dream.

  • Also it would take incredible amounts of time just to comprehend this data, just to make sure we don't miss any important steps! We have to think slow, but safe.

  • But, the time and effort to get to a particular worm hole would be months, possibly years, we just don't have that kind of money right now.

  • Truly elevating time is beyond our reach...*sigh* To think if time moves faster in space...could we do things faster too?

  • A fish past the point of no return? What if you're a salmon?

  • ok who let these guys play portal?

  • What aload of tosh.

  • what we need is some means of holding it open? a zpm will do

  • @starhawks1 meh... dont u think an asgard core is enough ?

  • @Ph3NoMeNoN001 ha yeah that should work just fine

  • So... we speculate that because clocks move more slowly in space that things also age at different rates? Did it ever occur to anybody that perhaps gravity plays a part in resistance to moving objects in a machine (i.e. a clock)?

  • Further: the perception of time might be different from one place to another, but on earth moving around time zones doesn't make your day longer, it's just perceived that way. Perception does not equal absolute. People perceived the earth as flat, that does not make the earth itself flat.

  • @diaser525 well even if you could travel through time you would see nobody from the future because if you change the past you will change your future make sense and if you do that the change could screw up a lot of things in yours and everyone else's life.

  • @audimaro grow the fuck up this has nothing to do with Justin bieber.

  • I have found the solution. The negative matter needed to make time travel possible is Justin Beiber. Launch that fucker into a worm hole.

  • Hooray for complex theoretical physics!

  • why wouldnt they think that the gravitational field affect the mechanical parts of the clocks? thats why it moves faster

  • u can't time travel unless it was unstable cause a wormhole is connected to anouther wormhole cause timetravle need to disconect from each other then it will be unstabe and possible u can connect with time it self and randomly go forward in time or back in time. if the wormhole is stable u will go right out the other wormhole u wont timetravel at all but it a risk to go though when it unstable if we do find extic particles u can probly conect with time if your luck its a 1/1000 i am out of words

  • A more realstic way of time travel is going as close as possible as the speed of light. Going at that speed time slows down causing no damage, no factor and a alot simpler way of time travel. Only thing is we can't go in the past. Oh well.

  • Also, Sorry to burst a bubble here, but wormholes are just a theory, and if they were real we couldn't get past them with out them breaking off too fast, and it would take as much power as a star blowing up to go thru them, andd we would end up in a distance so far, that we wont be able to run back to earth to say we made it thru the wormhole, and if we could we may be in the past so they might not get the message. All this makes it a factor of how we wont be able to get thru a wormhole.

  • Okay, if time travel was possible, wouldn't we see poeple from the future coming back to this time? Anways if it was possible, then it was cause a paradox destroying space and time, so it would destroy everything,? And cause unstability of time? it just seems to unreal. , if wormholes were real and not a theory but a fact, wouldn't it just travel us like a portal but not time ? It's confusing ? Help me out.

  • what they said abt the clock ticking faster as u go higher into space... its just mechanichs and physics..... that does not convince me as time traveling...

  • Sir Blacky got it backwards. The Rocketship is going to the future slower. At least he had an english accent.

  • WTF

  • Interesting video! I am an artist on YouTube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time

    This theory is based on just two simple postulates

    1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself

    2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event

  • Some means of holding it open?!

    Goddamnit! Build a STARGATE!

    Thumbs up if you agree.

  • If you were to time travel somewhere else then wouldn't you mess up time and would be lost in another parallel universe somewhere is a super far place from ours and how would we define someone from the past and the future if people could time travel. History would change and the future can change if you change stuff in the past

  • yes, but a clock is made by man, if i were to go into space and count 10 seconds, it would be the same time as someone on earth counting to 10 seconds. clocks simply work differently in different gravitational pulls and that is mechanics.

  • Comment removed

  • this almost makes my mind explode and my iq is genius level

  • One person didn't make it through the wormhole :s

  • @Arkenaz1 shut up

  • @Arkenaz1 clearly you're from the past, because it's up to 4 people now.

  • and negative gravitational ffield would be a property of negative matter or anti matter?....

    so if we had the ingredients to make this time travel manipulation work what would be the procedure? just travel around the negative gravitational field?

  • @venezlano92f we would actually use negetive mass matter not anitmatter at all. though antimatter would be used as a good power supply for the experiment

  • @venezlano92f anti matter is still matter, it is just made of different particles with opposite charges. Negative matter is not made up of particles that can be affected positively by gravity like protons (matter) and positrons (antimatter). Negative matter wants to " roll away or up" from a gravitational field.

  • so if we are in a negative gravitational field time would go in reverse and "rate" would depend on its intensity?... i need a new brain please

  • lol its not even funny to dislike something like this. this is the type of thing that either you like it or you dont give a fuck. disliking physics is like disliking life.. why would that guy disli... omg forget it

  • Thank you very much for this video! Very educational.

  • sorry its in two parts read from my first comment two below this if interested

  • Euclidean wormholes are even stranger given that they live in an imaginary timeline so i doubt they are an option. and the whole thing about wormholes having a singularity, whos to say if a wormhole was going to take you to a paraelle universe were everything is opposite whos to say the laws of physics dont change wen yu reach the singularity which will allow you to pass through safely.

  • see how there is two different types of wormholes Lorentzian wormholes and Euclidean wormholes obvisiouly we could not use Lorentzian wormholes because they close to fast and we have no way of holding them open unless they find dark matter which i assume is what the hadron collider is for.

  • Call me stupid but I'm having trouble understanding this. How can these clocks show different times? Aren't they the same clock with the same components and everything? What will cause the same clock to tick slower in space?

  • @salehjoon It's not that it's ticking faster, it's that it's going through time faster.

  • @salehjoon T=T' / (sqrt (1 - sqr(v)/sqr(c))

  • Wow... For Geniuses, They are pretty stupid...

    1st off... The Clocks are just running faster... It's not Time Travel... If they were to have a Clock on Earth, and a Clock in Space... The one in Space would be running faster... If they bring the one in Space back to Earth, the Clocks' Time would be different from each other... Which proves that they are wrong...

  • 2nd... Time is a State of Mind... For example... 1 Person goes to sleep, and another stays awake... The one that stays awake, is going at a Normal Rate of Time... The one that is Sleeping, is going at a Faster Rate of Time... Ever notice that when you sleep, it feels like you were only asleep for a few minutes? It's because your Mind starts processing everything faster because energy isn't being used to process awareness... Which makes controlling Dreams difficult... (Continued on next Comment.)

  • @Yournothawt easy as that, is it?

  • @ShaunsBlogs Not really... It's pretty difficult to achieve this... The ability to Remember and Control your Dreams easily is called "Lucid Dreaming"... If you look it up on wikipedia, you can find out ways to do it... Although it doesn't explain the fact that it is the key to Time Travel, It explains how to achieve access to the Key...

  • Comment removed

  • @Yournothawt I actually didn't understand that clock thingy....whatever they revealed here is wrong.

  • @rohitvip: The clock stuff is right. Gravity slows down the rate at which time passes. Consider a clock on the ground & one high up in space. The second clock is in a weaker gravitational field; so time there passes faster. When the clock in space shows that 1 hour has passed, the clock on earth will show less than 1 hr has passed. The difference would be extremely small, measurable only with precise atomic clocks, like the ones used for GPS.

  • I think it'd ruin the fun of forward time travel if you have to age

  • Wormhole = SPACE AND TIME is bent, so there is a paradox in it... Just sayin

  • @rekinu5 You probably don't even understand the depth of what you're saying. There are paradoxes associated with wormholes, but that is why they are theoretical (or hypothetical as stated in the video). No where in the video does it state that they exist in the material world.

  • @GWBreck i do know that the space and time is bent all around universe around pkanets for example, what i meant was...

    how can you shoot yourself if you dont really exist?

  • One person is a fantasy writer.

  • johnjuan is gay

  • I just got inceptioned

  • Whatever i type in being 'speed of light', 'worm holes' or 'time travel' I get that freakin asian Mike Kaku

  • Thumbs up if all you could think about while watching this was FarScape.

  • by the way, the reporter in the background is a clown who have no knowledge of basic physics... what he stated is not what the scientist intended.. you can only go forward in time, not back, time is a scalar, not a vector... in simple terms, you can you to the future, not to the past...

  • @CNFrostXY I think he refers to it seems that time is a direction, as the 4th dimension.When working with dimensions, you can go "forward" or "backwards" in their directions. As travelling through wormholes is like connecting two points of 3D space through the 4th dimension, you're, in fact, moving along the time direction. And that would mean you'll be travelling backwards (or even forward) in time. But this is speculation; for now we don't have any form of being sure, as we only see 3D.

  • @Alpharius93 Look don't try argue if you don't know what you are talking about. You got the wrong point, what you meant was 'Spatial Dimension'. Look in cosmology we use the word differently at different times. colour is a dimension, what you like eat is a dimension. Here is another mathematical example: 2D space = delta 1D space/ delta time. 3D space = delta 2D space/ delta time. 4D space would be delta 3D space/delta time. Time = Integral of (1/3D)delta 2D and this is scalar.

  • @CNFrostXY Hey don't get angry, I just posted what I heard. And I know more cosmology and astrophysics you probably suppose from my post, sorry if I was wrong. I would only notice that we cannot be sure, for now, about these matters as we can't sense them.

    Well, if we found traversable wormholes, I would prefer not to travel in time because I don't want to reach a nother time! It would be a mess O.o

  • HOLD UP FOLKS !! , if u some how get in a worm whole and go 1000 years back words when your parents are not even born , u will sease to exist as well but if u go 1000 years for wards u might have already died , and even by great luck if u get to the past 5 or 6 days before you entered the worm whole u dont know where you are going to be , u can also land up in the core of the sun , if you are even luckeyer and land up some where in earth with you having no memory of ur time travel

  • @1998anirudh ... clearly you don't understand what space time and relativity means...

  • @CNFrostXY humn im just a little confused , time is equal every where soo if u get into a worm hole time should rewind it self right ? if time rewinds it self then your memory will be rewinded too so you will be in a worm hole again like you did in that past which got rewinded so this will keep happening so we will be stuck in time lol xD :S iduno :<

  • @1998anirudh ....ah.. it takes some knowledge of physics and time to explain all these but you are confused, first time is not equal everywhere but it is always relative depending on your position and velocity, this can be explained easier through mathematics if you want you can search them up. Second, time is a scalar, not vector therefore you NEVER go back in time, worm hole is only hypothetical but if you DO go into it, your time just slows down RELATIVE to people outside it.

  • @CNFrostXY lol im further confused got a gmail id :D ?

  • @1998anirudh Umm.. Ok... unfortunately I do not have a gmail id I either use my university email or a private one which neither do I want to post here! But first umm what is your background regarding physics and mathematics? And are you really interested in these theories and are you a philosopher? (anyone who thinks alot and who ask questions and try solve them).

  • @CNFrostXY give me anything like gmail , im not a philosopher ;d

  • @CNFrostXY i live for physics :d , yes im am intrested , im not a philospher :d

  • @1998anirudh but still what I'm saying in the latter part is only based on assumptions because worm holes ARE only theories and part of parallel universe too, which is in fact less popular than string theory, but still, both theories involve higher dimensional SPACES thus we can never conclude what will happen if we DO encounter them, but the more sensible answer is just we never wil know even they are there because we are traped in our 3D space...

  • @1998anirudh Thus it is foolish for ANYone to state what will happen if we DO exist in a higher dimensional space because we CANNOT even be aware of its existence because our vision is 2D (if you are in 2D world your vision is 1D). So we CANT visualise >3D space. I am trying to be as precise as possible here. Now you may ask why we even have these stupid theories then, the purpose for these theories is really to explain forces in our universe like gravity, where they from. Hope I cleared it up.

  • @CNFrostXY it is comments like yours that make the comment section worth reading in youtube... thanks so much for sharing so many thoughts....

  • @elmalacopa Haha, I had to look through pages to find my own comment, I forgot about it! Thanks for your nice comment, just on a brief note of reminder for everyone, Science on TV is 98% of the time unreliable, you are NOT suppose to trust them. Read peer reviewed thesis, not the usual science journals. ... I guess I shouldn't really say this here but I think it is important for those who authentically seek scientific discoveries, even though we can never be certain in science...

  • @1998anirudh PLUS if you have any further questions and would like to discuss because you are interested please feel free to, I will be very happy to discuss them with anyone who is keen on topics regarding mathematics, philosophy, astrophysics, the cosmos (they are all linked closely). Due to the limited space on youtube I can nearly never give you full explainations but if you provide me with an email address Ill be happy to send you a detailed explaination on your enquiries.

  • @opawari yes you are correct , if u travel back in time you can get to another place u will be in the place where u were there in the past going back in time is nonsence :D

  • so if a kid can't wait till he become an adult, he's just gonna live in a space shuttle above earth?

  • I WANT TO ROSEN BRIDGE MY WIFE TO ANOTHER PLACE OR GO BACK TO WIN SHE WAS HOT. THAT WOOD BE SSSSSWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE­EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEETTTTTTTTTTTT­T OR JUST SPAGETIFY HER ILL CALL HER MY TOOTH PAISTYEST LITTLE MOMA.

  • is wormhole in bh like a hurricane in the ocean that is neutral in the centre.you can go throw it. and travel from one galaxy to an other.if the sea is like sea on outer space.

  • if you traveled into the future would you get older as you travel forwerd into time?

  • @marayno1 supposedly no, because your time is relative to you and you are going to another time as YOU so by that, that means you will still be like how you were a few mins ago.

    i wonder how it will look here on earth, like they vanish for 30 years come back and its all over the news they came back and they look just like they did 30 years ago. thats some crazy shit to fathom lol

  • @marayno1 if you travel into the future you would be travelling really fast, lets suppose, you are going close to speed of light, then you age less.... so for example, if you travel 20 light years at the speed of light you will not age 20 years, you will age much less than that... and your perception of time will not be of 20 years either, it will be less... watch time travel by discovery ch. and stephen hawking , they explain with a train example going at speed of light

  • This is done well but remember it is extremely dumbed down. For example the black holes. The event horizon poses a significant hurdle since time can almost come to a stop to an outside viewer. It may take billions of years for an object to cross over the horizon. The the object it's a few minutes before it's atoms are ripped to shreds. To the outside viewer, the object is in suspended animation. Again, this is all theory since experimenting such things is well beyond our current technology.

  • they say you lose bone/muscle mass after 40 and you lose more and more. this may be simmilar to people who go in to space.

  • @HatakeStrife stuff that you can't even begin to comprehend o.0

  • Holy fuck this shit totally blew my mind!!!!

  • Peter F. Hamilton's 'Pandora's Star' is based on the wormhole-subway idea. I hope it actually happens! Within the next 50 years would be great so I have a chance of using one. Get to it scientists!

  • god being a eternal being*

  • einsteins theory of relativity also permits a god (i don't believe in god but) the deper into space you are the longer you live if theres no end to space then there must be a point where your body dosent age at all.

  • @GrappleMania01 .....what..the..fuck..r.u.talk­ing about...

  • @GrappleMania01 Where did you find Einstein theory of relativity permitting a god? I have read the whole theory and nowhere is mentioned about god.

  • also to all those misunderstanding the time clocks thing man keeps time with clocks yet time is relative how you experience time and I experience time is totally different not just mentally but physically my body may age much faster or slower than yours. in space with no gravity and other "stuff" your body will age differently probablly much slower if you could get an earth clock keeping earth time you'd live a hell of a lot longer.

  • to conquer time travel first we need to find a way to freeze people alive and bring them out of their frozen state once time travel has ben perfected then in that future send them back to our present. we won't get anywhere until we learn to freze people demolition man style.

  • if that were true than couldnt an anti grav unit be the key to time travil

  • Stargate SG1, though a sci-fi series, did use many of these same theories in their episode and show theory creation. (Although, they kinda disregard time dilation when using the Odyssey and Daedalus. But, there was no decent plot mechanism to explain this.)

  • @MrRolando3500 @MrRolando3500 Time would go faster but you won't age, your age would stay the same.

  • @MrRolando3500 u r right

  • so.... if clocks moves slower on earth, and further from earth moves quickly.. would we age differently? for example, a twin of the same age. one on earth and one further away from earth. will that makes either of them age faster than the other?

  • @Lollyferdolly Yes that is Einstein's theory of a twin paradox.

  • @hamillpj sweet. so i will age slowly if im in space?