THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THIS VIDEO. Against 1.d4 and 1. c4 i always play the king's indian, grunfeld, or benoni set-ups and happily i often create a mixture of all 3 systems. I think the benoni is great in 3-minute blitz games, but in 1-HOUR games i don't do so well and just manage to get around 20% of wins, 20% draws and 60% losses against my opponent fritz. I URGE EVERYONE to only play STRONG COMPUTERS as they teach you in-between moves and punish the slightest inaccuracies.That way you LEARN!
Please like this video if you got something out of it, or even better add it to your favourites. Help crush the Trolls! You could also subscribe to this channel to get notified of any new videos - subscribing is free and easy.Cheers, K.
Fischer is the greatest chess player of all time. Every other world champion does something other than play chess. You people dont realize, this game was his obsession. Kasparov is married etc. All the little things that distract you from playing the game, fischer ignored. He was the michael jordan of chess and he would beat anyone ever. You cant stop a man like that. Fritz at times hasnt even picked up on a fischers moves. FRITZ. And I have to say Paul Morphy was the best talent.
Its very hard to find videos on your channel. I've spend the last 15 min trying to find Game 1 of the 1972 match, and there is no organization to your site so that I can find it.
@dmed312 just type the 2 words - fischer spasky - into his search box. If you want to make it more permanent put the resulting games into a play list - hope that helps.
Fischer was 2 points down in a 21 game match. He needed a win. He had never beaten Spassky before. He was playing Black. All of my friends and I thought the match was over. When Fischer won, we thought he was a god. I remember that day like it was yesterday.
USSR and USA didnt beat each other up... the countries they used, on the other hand, werent so lucky... but that isnt something to discuss in this video...
I humbly disagree. Certainly true of later matches in this series, but this was the first game in the "other room" right after Fischer whined about the cameras until they caved right?
I think both players were a little sloppy in this round...
Yeah, it's a nice check/fork...Fischer left himself open by keeping Spaasky in check instead of snagging the D5 pawn or pushing into G2 to wreck shop and snag the A2 pawn. I think he just felt too far down in material and was lazy, but Spaasky was lazi-ER. :)
The Benoni isn't very strong. I think Fischer new this, and he hoped on just generating complications. Had Spassky played a little stronger (not Qc2 early on as well) he would have exploited the Benoni weaknesses easily. I'm sure no one has played it the way Fischer has since this game. It's very Tal-ish, and most of Tal's moves were refuted after he won those games.
Capitalism might not teach chess like it coaches foot-ball, but it produces ample supplies of toasters, microwaves, air-conditioning systems, and our spaceships weren't tin tans on a powder-keg :P
It was common knowledge in the chess world and also the concensus among most soviet grandmasters at the time that Fischer would have beaten karpov with relative ease. Who is living in the dream world??
I remember following the match every day ... Most everyone said it was hopeless for Fisher by Game 3. He was down by 2 points, he lost Game 1 from a stupid blunder, chickened out of Game 2, and Fisher had never beaten Spassky as this level before. This was the crucial game ... Today's heroes would have blamed a dead mom and checked into rehab. He showed up, played brilliantly, and won the match. He is the best ... the best there ever was, and the best there ever will be.
Fisher "threw" that game to the Soviets, or to Spassky, so to speak, to apologize for his "antiques". It was his way of saying "sorry"...Trust me, Fisher never blundered.
The second theory suggests the move was a corrrectly calculated step to carry the game into complications.
Interesting theories ... but totally out of character. Fisher always played for a win, and was widely known and well respected for abhoring grandmaster draws. But he would never throw a game nor would he push for a win if there was a high probability of a loss. The consensus of opinion then and now is that he miscalculated the complications and the chances they gave him to win. But after such a questionable move, what an ego-smasher a win would have been ... what balls!
in this game he demonstrates unparalleled genius who was fischer losing two to zero playing with black pieces defeat Spassky easily
AXEL77ism 1 month ago
This strikes me as one of my favorite games ever.
AndyMH182 2 months ago
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THIS VIDEO. Against 1.d4 and 1. c4 i always play the king's indian, grunfeld, or benoni set-ups and happily i often create a mixture of all 3 systems. I think the benoni is great in 3-minute blitz games, but in 1-HOUR games i don't do so well and just manage to get around 20% of wins, 20% draws and 60% losses against my opponent fritz. I URGE EVERYONE to only play STRONG COMPUTERS as they teach you in-between moves and punish the slightest inaccuracies.That way you LEARN!
TEDOVSKY 2 months ago in playlist Fischer vs Spassky match of 1972
Awesome
FassinTaak 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No such word as "forfeited" its just, forfeit!
MagicianPugh 4 months ago
Please like this video if you got something out of it, or even better add it to your favourites. Help crush the Trolls! You could also subscribe to this channel to get notified of any new videos - subscribing is free and easy.Cheers, K.
kingscrusher 5 months ago
What a game!!!!!!!!!!!
rab631 6 months ago
black knight G5 was an genius move....or totally crazy and yet genius.
Laseptiemewilaya 7 months ago
@Laseptiemewilaya often there isnt much of a diffrence between gennius and crazy ;)
hackerkillea 1 month ago
@Bl4ckR0ck
Fischer is the greatest chess player of all time. Every other world champion does something other than play chess. You people dont realize, this game was his obsession. Kasparov is married etc. All the little things that distract you from playing the game, fischer ignored. He was the michael jordan of chess and he would beat anyone ever. You cant stop a man like that. Fritz at times hasnt even picked up on a fischers moves. FRITZ. And I have to say Paul Morphy was the best talent.
willsmackyoudown 8 months ago
@willsmackyoudown then again fischer joined a religion, I think marriage beats that
suvaline02 6 months ago
very efficient. a few dynamic moves to gain just enough of an edge and maintain it throughout. textbook stuff.
GarrBear314 11 months ago
Its very hard to find videos on your channel. I've spend the last 15 min trying to find Game 1 of the 1972 match, and there is no organization to your site so that I can find it.
dmed312 1 year ago
@dmed312 just type the 2 words - fischer spasky - into his search box. If you want to make it more permanent put the resulting games into a play list - hope that helps.
DontBendOverForAllah 1 year ago
@dmed312 did you look for game 2 as well? :)
oryxfreeride 1 year ago
Fischer was 2 points down in a 21 game match. He needed a win. He had never beaten Spassky before. He was playing Black. All of my friends and I thought the match was over. When Fischer won, we thought he was a god. I remember that day like it was yesterday.
56richardcory 1 year ago 3
people are so fickle....
if spassky had won the game(maybe even due to some mistake in the middle game)they would have said fischers opening was dumb....
now that hes won they say his opening was a genius....
fischer was great anyway but my agony is towards the bias of people....
vijaysuri 1 year ago 3
you didn't mention this was played in the back room away from all the cameras
james1x1x1x1 2 years ago
good interpretation and interesting game
thanks
ArseneLupin2009 2 years ago
La defensa Indo-Benoni fue una de las preferidas de Fischer.
paradoxicus 2 years ago
why was Nb5 never played to attack the d6 pawn?
HomelessTwit 2 years ago
i always find it funny when someone accuses a gm chess player of being sloppy...
Henrique676 2 years ago
Not compared to me; compared to Fischer's own peak play.
To believe that they play at the same level every match is ludicrous, at best.
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago
What's more important...winning Chess tourneys...or winning the cold war?
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago
that is strange to think about... lol
Destroyer666AU 2 years ago
They are one in the same
dylancaprotti 2 years ago
+1 IQ to the fractal, cold warrior!
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago
who won the cold war really?
Henrique676 2 years ago
China
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago 9
...maybe we should all learn to play Go?
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago 6
Ah yes thats right, they used their dragons and magical tigers, i remember now
Henrique676 2 years ago
They stepped back and let the USSR and USA beat each other up while they positioned themselves to be an economic superpower. Bright fellows, they.
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago
USSR and USA didnt beat each other up... the countries they used, on the other hand, werent so lucky... but that isnt something to discuss in this video...
Henrique676 2 years ago 5
indeed
liebelicht 2 years ago
Fischer won because he made great chess moves. It was his great chess that made Spassky lose his nerves.
RebelRay 2 years ago
I humbly disagree. Certainly true of later matches in this series, but this was the first game in the "other room" right after Fischer whined about the cameras until they caved right?
I think both players were a little sloppy in this round...
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago
I wasn't talking only about this game, but the match in general.
RebelRay 2 years ago
I agree. Spassky was spooked (ironic no?).
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago
see at 7:13 --> spassky could catch fischers bishop if i move his queen to G-5 and then to F-5
Psychorap23 3 years ago
Bg6
dougweight39 2 years ago 3
Yeah, it's a nice check/fork...Fischer left himself open by keeping Spaasky in check instead of snagging the D5 pawn or pushing into G2 to wreck shop and snag the A2 pawn. I think he just felt too far down in material and was lazy, but Spaasky was lazi-ER. :)
sixthSigmaSnowball 2 years ago
View Bl4ckR0ck's profile if you're interested in his agenda. He knows nothing of chess, only his pet "marxist-leninism"
pianomikey0 3 years ago
The Benoni isn't very strong. I think Fischer new this, and he hoped on just generating complications. Had Spassky played a little stronger (not Qc2 early on as well) he would have exploited the Benoni weaknesses easily. I'm sure no one has played it the way Fischer has since this game. It's very Tal-ish, and most of Tal's moves were refuted after he won those games.
tcslick420 3 years ago
i like the analysis
XXXshukuchiXXX 3 years ago
Capitalism might not teach chess like it coaches foot-ball, but it produces ample supplies of toasters, microwaves, air-conditioning systems, and our spaceships weren't tin tans on a powder-keg :P
AWS12345678910 3 years ago
Perhaps Bl4ckROck can also explain?
Fischer vs. Taimanov 6-0
Fischer vs. Larsen 6-0
...and then murdering the very strong Petrosian to face Spassky. All just dumb luck 'eh?
krakatoahhh007 3 years ago 19
It was common knowledge in the chess world and also the concensus among most soviet grandmasters at the time that Fischer would have beaten karpov with relative ease. Who is living in the dream world??
krakatoahhh007 3 years ago 3
you should complete the fischer vs spassky 1972 games, have a collection
lovetowatchvids 3 years ago 5
Please show us some Fisher Bent LArsen games
breaulenny 3 years ago
Please show us the game of all Fischer - Spassky Games. that would be pretty
DamnControl2 3 years ago
Karpov in his prime vs Fisher in his prime, My money is on Karpov.
petercsada 3 years ago
I remember following the match every day ... Most everyone said it was hopeless for Fisher by Game 3. He was down by 2 points, he lost Game 1 from a stupid blunder, chickened out of Game 2, and Fisher had never beaten Spassky as this level before. This was the crucial game ... Today's heroes would have blamed a dead mom and checked into rehab. He showed up, played brilliantly, and won the match. He is the best ... the best there ever was, and the best there ever will be.
56richardcory 3 years ago 2
The game 1 blunder theory is not correct.
Fisher "threw" that game to the Soviets, or to Spassky, so to speak, to apologize for his "antiques". It was his way of saying "sorry"...Trust me, Fisher never blundered.
The second theory suggests the move was a corrrectly calculated step to carry the game into complications.
petercsada 3 years ago
Interesting theories ... but totally out of character. Fisher always played for a win, and was widely known and well respected for abhoring grandmaster draws. But he would never throw a game nor would he push for a win if there was a high probability of a loss. The consensus of opinion then and now is that he miscalculated the complications and the chances they gave him to win. But after such a questionable move, what an ego-smasher a win would have been ... what balls!
56richardcory 3 years ago
its amazing the way they see all this deep lines ... the Nh5 move is what separates the grandmasters from the rest of us amateurs
erlico82 3 years ago 5
The Nh5 is probably also what separates Fischer from most Grandmasters
hmsrenown 3 years ago 5
These are very entertaining indeed. I just got back into chess after a layoff. Well done.
gwynedd1 4 years ago
You are a true Kingcrusher.Thank You
gologram 4 years ago
thanks for the video!!
hebrerocasasayas 4 years ago
Excellent video! I look forward to these videos everyday now and I hope you continue to do them. Really cool!
clees3161 4 years ago 2
Nh5!? outstanding move.
fischer was on the verge of forfeiting
the match due to russian paranoia before
this brilliant game.
macnolds 4 years ago 2
Great video and great game!
jrobichess 4 years ago 2