911 : VERY RARE WTC7 AMATUER VIDEO !!! MUST SEE !!!

[riverstrat]

Why did the collapse begin neatly at the base of the building (not in the upper floors) -----and uniformly ?

The fuel EXPLODED in every direction upon impact.

The buiding burned because that is what they do once a fire is out of control,

High rises do not 'collapse' do to fires.

[cmadodge]

Those of you who oppose the truth movement are actively supporting the elite's agenda and I doubt you notice... I really want to know why you guys insist on your point of view. Does all of your small talk result in your satisfaction? Are you trying to extinguish ideas that may oppose the families' interests? So are we. Are you trying to be patriotic or allegiant to your country? So are we. Are you afraid that everything you've believed so far (and based your identity on) is a lie? So were we.

[datzfast]

the order to get the fuck out was given to all three buildings. why, because of eminent collapse. evebody in the world knows it was fire that bowed the steal 90 degrees, hell they were showing it live.

[zenoist2]

WTc7 was evacuated long before either tower had collapsed.

This is known and proven fact.

I dont see the problem here he simply gave the go ahead for it to be demoilished.

As it was.

I know some morons think a plane hit wtc7 but it didnt.

They also think rubble struck all 4 sides of the building at the same time LOL. causing the even collapse.

Controlled demolition pure and simple. Do you shithead debunkers really beleive ANY building falls at free fall acceleration due to fire?

[KurdenBoy90]

look for 0:02 there you can see a vertical white stripe of shockwaves just like as bombs explode...

[CrazyFinnishKid]

Your All Idoits. Yes, WTC 7 Was A Controlled Demolition. Why? They Didnt Use The Building Nobody Was In That Building, Yet Again Nothing Was Probably In The Building. That Building Had Dynomite In It And Was Set To Be Demolished That Weekend. Since The Terriost Attack Happened And The Towers Fell. The Owner/CEO Of WTC Told Tge Demonlition People To Pull The Plug On WTC 7. There Now Its Fully Explained. By The Way None Of 9/11 Was An Inside Job Amd You Should Just Be Thankful You Can Live Your L

[godzilla1077]

@CrazyFinnishKid Here's why your wrong. If you notice the building did lean towards the south end. Why? Because hours before it feel huge pieces of the north tower fell on it. From that damage WTC7 lost 20 stories near the baseline and described by fire fighters Boyle and Nigro. The damage was on the south end. NYFD saw that the building couldnt be saved and told people to stay clear hours before collapse. The fire was just the nail in the WTC&'s coffin and it collapsed.

[wkwickham01]

@CrazyFinnishKid twoofers love the "pull it" quote - which was clearly taken out of context - watch his complete interview and he is clearly talking about pulling the fire fighting effort to save lives

not pull the bldg down

loose change deliberately took this out of context to promote sales and lies

[milackk7]

@wkwickham01 We've been over this - there were no firefighters in that building. Barry Jennings attests to that. And this is coming from a man who sued his insurance company for TWO counts of terrorist attacks and won over $7 Billion from a $15 Million investment. Everything was a money-maker in 911, it couldn't have been more perfect.

[NellJSmith]

@wkwickham01 Nobody, but nobody, who speaks fluent Engilsh (as Larry Silverstein does) refers to a GROUP of people as "IT". Perhaps as "THEM", but never, EVER as "IT". He would have said: "Pull THEM"... and even at that, pull them where? He'd have said "Pull them back/out of the building/out of danger" etc. It's common parlance (not even reserved for specialist demolition experts) here in the UK to say a demolished building has been, or will be, "pulled down" - indeed, from the old "cable" days.

[NellJSmith]

@wkwickham01... And another point to bear in mind: the NY Fire Chief is on record stating that he, and ONLY he, would make any decision as to whether to remove fire crews and demolish a building or not... so precisely WHOM was Silverstein talking to about "pulling" anything? The NYFD Chief is ON FILM stating that the IDEA that he would have consulted Silverstein, as the building's owner, is "disgusting and obscene". So how does that add up with Silverstein "directing the fire crews' withdrawal"?

[zenoist2]

@wkwickham01 So why does an intelligent man say "it instead of "them"? Apart from the fact wtc7 was evacuated around 9 am and this quote came much later what else do you think it means?

I presume you have a brain?

If youre a debunker i guess not so well skip that.

And cut to the chase, there were no people in wtc7 after 9 am because it was evacuated got it?

So what is sliversten refering to?

You can bet your life its not people or fire crews.

[TheExeter]

If the US govt. did this and we all know they did, they are terrorists and traitors and under the law they must be put to death along with all their cohorts involved. If they are protected by the police, this means that the police are just like the Gestapo and must also be executed along with anyone supporting this NWO (Naziism). DO NOT LET HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF.

[KuSkinn1]

@TheExeter This my friend is how the "beautiful" world we live in works, Sadly the police are just as criminals as the ones they spend all days arresting, If not worse.. Sadly the same can be said for the Politicians and mostly everyone we have been thought to trust is the "good" guys. 9/11, NWO, Cheamtrails, Stripping people for human rights, the evidence of it all is pretty clear, we just dont believe in what we see before the media tells us if this is true or not.

[revolutionary1982]

cluelesslibs that name suits you perfectly because thats exactly what you are clueless.Do you speak arabic or was you just reading subtitles fed to you by the media.You should inform the FBI cause they dont seem to think OSAMA responsible.One day this all gone come out,it might take 25years to get to the info but it wont change the fact that 911 was an inside job.

[ChilloutSessionZ]

They can report on the news obama is a serial killer and you fuckers would believe it.

Just like what they did on 911.

[alecgriffithsNC]

thats wierd y didnt smoke fly everywhere

[watballs2020]

awwww,how nice..Larry silversteins home movie..

[HVYMETL]

That whitish band going rapidly from left to right at 0:03 looks like the typical shock wave of an ordinance explosion when it is surrounded by smoke.

[phucoff1]

i'm pretty sure 'Controlled explosions' have little explosions all over the building, none seen there? over to you paranoid theorists!

[hEAtOniKx]

All you have to do is have common sense to see that this building came down from explosives.... where the fuck is the resistance during collapse????

[WELLGURU]

bLD 7 WAS NEVER HIT BY ANY PLANE ! IT HAD A FIRE IN A FEW ROOMS ON A COUPLE OF FLOORS IT WAS 2 BLOODS FROM THE TRADE CENTERS IT WAS A 47 STORY STEEL FRAME MODERN BUILDING IF YOU EVER WORKED ON A HIGH RISE YOU WOULD SCARF AT THIS TO AND KNOW THE REAL UGLY TRUTH ! YOUR STUPID IF YOU THINK A GOV. WOULD NOT SCREW ITS OWN PEOPLE OVER THATS THE DUMBEST COMMENT I HAVE EVER HEARD !!! GOOD GRIEF

[KingAdam211276]

OH AND YOU DONT THINK THAT A 1,450 FOOT BUILDING STANDING 300 FEET IN FRONT OF BUILDING 7 CALLED THE NORTH TOWER AND AS IT COLLAPSED AND PULVERIZED THAT BUILDING IN TO KINGDOM COME???!!!?? do your research before you try and debate things you have no knowledge of. that building also had 5 deisel generators fueling those fires and after burning for 7 HOURS it finally gave way and pancaked itself

[WELLGURU]

you dummy ! the fuel never caught fire in either building ! it was a non event ass whipe ! Do you have any clue what happened on 911 ? or you get your news from CNN ? ?? there was 3 fires on Bld 7 all isolated and the other building same thing you idiot good grief they have you bamboozeled dont they ? and I supose that old Silverburg spent the summer beefing up his buildings insurance to pay a dual payout with a terror attack because Hes a shrude landlord !

[KingAdam211276]

hahaha easy with the insults and it seems to me you got your facts from loose change. and what you just posted literally makes no sense at all first you say the fuel never caught fire in either building? ok...ha then you say there were 3 fires in building 7? which one is it? there were no fires or there were 3 isolated fires? get your story straight then talk to me.

[JSSTyger]

@KingAdam211276

NIST says the following:

-Diesel generators played no significant role

-long span trusses played no significant role

-WTC 7 would have collapsed due to the uncontrolled fires even if there was no damage from WTC 1

-Collapse due primarily to uncontrolled fires and resultant thermal expansion

Thats from NIST's Final Report on WTC 7. I know their theory changed quite a bit. Therefore yours has to.

[cluelesslibs]

what gets me is all you twoofer idiots think you are experts. You dont know anything . J Just liek the loose change idiots that got embarrased. Bin-Laden and Al-Queda claimed responsibility.

NORAD,NTSB,FAA would have had to been involved, canada is a part of Norad so they would habe been involved. the ATC's and fire fighters would have to be involved. You twoofer idiots are just that. trying to make a name for yourself and some $ to.

[wrestinc]

why would the government blow up a build with people inside

[solinjar]

why would a country go to war?

[bwylde27]

@solinjar cause Bush and Cheney made money off the war, just like his daddy did in the Gulf War.

[TheNovaAxon]

@wrestinc

To blame it on someone else and get the support from the ppl.

[HeadLessMunkees]

Stop your sensless Bullshit NOW.

Many Victims Families Wounds are Reopened because of your Cowardly lies.

So you find some who are Bush haters and you infest there minds with this no planer-thermite Bullshit. NOT enough ?

How about Crimscumskull AND his 50+

Attack accounts? Got Agenda? Your all fake and you lie and slander the victims last reports. Im here to show you how stupid you look. And you promote Terrorizim by continuing to spread hate of our Government. Mock me now you slimy scums

[zenoist2]

intriguing.

There are very obvious secondary explosions all along it as it collapses.

[ligichka]

puppet ;)

[JSSTyger]

How does a 47 story building crumple and compact itself into just a 6 story pile of rubble? Why was there not one column that survived that was still leaning over the pile of debris? Not one column. Not one girder.

Every major connection must have been severed. Thats what has to happen in order to get a small rubble pile.

[trutherslie]

again yet another LIE.

Look at the debris pile against the Verizion Building.

Look at all the damage to Fitterman Hall (including the collapse from the roof) due to damage from wtc7.

Yup it must have been CD to blow it up so that the buildings on BOTH side were heavily damaged. ($1.7 billion to verizion building, fitterman hall a complete loss)

[JSSTyger]

"again yet another LIE"

Which part did I lie about?

At what point in your post did you say anything that had to do with my post?

Try not to lie now.

[bweazel]

He is a huge liar. I think that's all he does. He's just here to aggitate. He'll misquote you, put words in your mouth, and plain just make shit up. So really. Argue at your own risk. I think it's a waste of time with this loser though. He won't stay on any topic.

[trutherslie]

by all means liddle twoofer. I have blown up every one of your bs statements and you shift.

I don't. come on liddle twoofer. just one fact. why can't you twoofers ever come up with one?

[trutherslie]

by all means provide just one video from the ground showing the collapse of the towers or wtc7 in which you can hear CD charges going off. Just one video.. it should be easy to find in the most videotaped event in recent memory.

there should be hundreds of those videos with numerous explosions right before the buildings collapse. it should be really easy to find. I'm waiting.

[bweazel]

Again. There are plenty. I'm not going to waste my time sending you the ones I've seen. You'll just say ohhh that was a transformer (with no proof of it being a transformer) or ohhhh that was a diesel tank, little twoofer (with zero proof of any of the buildings containing diesel tanks) blah blah blah. It's a waste of time arguing with you. But it's almost entertaining to watch you inflate your own ego. Keep it up man. You're making your side look like a bunch of choads ; )

[trutherslie]

hahahahaha just like a baby twoofer.

i ask you for proof, and you can't provide one citation which shows numerous successive blasts in the towrs right before they collapse. hahahaha.

I provide citaitons and links to back up my claims.. that is the difference between proof and twoof.

[Sature1985]

no, all agencies were around at this day to collect the video and sound tapes, only a few survived...

[trutherslie]

hahahaha.

There are literally HUNDREDS of different original video tapes from 9/11 that are available. To claim they have been rounded up so that only a few survive is utter and complete bullshit.

so find just one video which shows a series of concussive blasts in the towers before they collapsed.

[Sature1985]

yep there are hundreds of videos but they are cutted and altered, the only footage u should do your research on is the live footage from that day, btw. google/youtube "foxed out" to see the whole manipulation, im not kiddin to u and i dont want to blame u, maybe u are scared of what is really goin on, but its not you or me, its our leaders they are goin insane, they arent cool, they are sadistic leaders who want to see how we suffer, sounds crazy but its the fact, thx for listening

[trutherslie]

"there was not one column that surived and was still elaning over the pile of debris"

columns bent and standing

debunking911*com/ b7verizon2* jpg

"must have been severed" connections weren't severed, but they failed and snapped.

watch?v=PhKrirlTw8c shows the broken connections in the towers, adn the same thing happened in wtc7.

[JSSTyger]

WTC 7 debris pile

google "killtown was wtc 7 pulled a perfect implosion" and click killtown's link. there is zero outstanding steel. Its all perfectly lumped in with everything else

[trutherslie]

killtown? Really?

hahahaha. Oh i love da widdle twoofers.

it's all perfectly lumped in with everything else... of course it is.

it isn't like it did $1.4 Billion in damages to the Verizion building, or did enough damage to fitterman hall on the OTHER side of the street that it required full demoltions.

Yup that is a "perfectly lumped pile."

how does a CD manage to actually massively damage 2 buildings on opposite sides of the building? while being a "symmetrical" collapse?

[JSSTyger]

"killtown? Really?"

Yeah? So what...your link was from debunking911dotcom.

Would you like to own yourself furthur?

"it isn't like it did $1.4 Billion in damages to the Verizion building"

What exactly does this matter? As all videos of the collapse show, the building went straight down into the ground.

"how does a CD massively damage 2 buildings on opposite sides of the building? while being a "symmetrical" collapse?"

You can have "rogue" pieces of debris, even in a CD.

[trutherslie]

If the building went "straight down into the ground" it wouldn't have done $1.4 Billion in damages on a building on ONE side, and enough damage to make the building on the other side need to be completely demolished.

If it does that, it isn't CD.

how hard is that for you to understand?

my link is an IMAGE which is hosted there... I'm not useing kiltowns argument and bs page.

[yewutube]

Your account is closed now, how about that.

[NiagaraWarrior]

although i am not saying it was a CD, loose debris flies out from CD all the time, thats why they used to cover neighboring buildings with steel fences and tarpaulins, and in more recent developments of CD, they cover the actual bombs in the steel fences and tarps, it keeps the concrete chunks from damaging nearby places. also, again, not saying it was a CD, if the twin towers were in CD, it would be IMPOSSIBLE for it not to damage other buildings, thats a shit load of falling tonnage.

[Skeptic121]

There is a blast on the lower left of WTC7 at about three seconds into the video. That would be the north east corner of the lowest visible floors. It appears to be a rapid blast, expanding to maximum size in one or two frames.

Is there a better resolution format of this video available? The owner of the "VEOH video" put his on MegaUpload. It makes a big difference: what appear to be flashes at low resolution turn out to be blasts of drywall and other debris out the windows.

[JSSTyger]

But Skeptic, you know that when a column snaps, loads of debris always shoot upwards at a 45° angle at 200mph.

I mean...it couldn't possible be an angled cutter charge. That just wouldn't be consistent with the official story.

[JSSTyger]

Obvious controlled demolition.

There is an EXTREMELY forceful blast at the onset of the collapse and it is also EXTREMELY localized.

[trutherslie]

again and again.

PROVE IT.

if it was CD, it would definatley be VERY obvious.

Cd blasts? sounds of the cd charges going off?

det cord? blasting caps?

freefall? collapse is 40% longer than freefall.. that isn't CD.

[JSSTyger]

I'm not sure why it isn't obvious to you. Straight down, timely, and explosive bursts. It fell 571 feet in 6.5 seconds. Thats 84% of free fall time (5.96 seconds)...thats only 19% longer than free fall time.

"40% longer than freefall"

No it wasn't...NIST now debunked themselves by admitting that the north face did indeed experience free fall ACCELERATIONS. The "40%" excuse has no relevance to anything. They originally used that excuse to deny any free fall acceleration all together.

[JSSTyger]

Notice the crafty math I did. 100%-84%=16%, of course, but the way NIST worded it though makes the number larger...19%.

NIST could have said that 3.9 seconds is 72% of 5.4 seconds and that free fall time would be 72% of observed time. This means we are only 28% short. So NIST worded as a a multiple of the 3.9 second time. 3.9(1+0.4)=5.4...instead of 3.9/5.4=0.72...thats where they get the 40%.

40% looks better than 28% (100-72). That is why it looks so far off.They are deceiving you.

[trutherslie]

Oh little truther.

And to think that you are supposed to be an engineer...I really hope the more seasoned engineers are holding your hands on anything you design.

Again and again.

1. Nist agreed with freefall, they didn't try to hide it, fully explained. David Chandler did a good job in fleshing it out.

Cd? Ok, that means you have video in which you can hear the CD charges going off... Why don't you have a single video of that? Oh.. superduper nanothermite. which is an incendiary

[JSSTyger]

You are WRONG. NIST's original Q&A, before the draft report, read

"Q: Did the north face ever enter free fall?

A: NO. We measured 5.4 seconds for 18 stories to drop behind the roofline of a building in the foreground. Free fall would have taken 3.9 seconds. The actual time was 40% longer than free fall"

And I am an EI and am smart and know that this response is IRRELEVANT.You sheep are laughable.You backed NIST when they said "no free fall" and now you back them when they say "oops"

[trutherslie]

Again and again... and before the draft report they were saying it was fires which caused all the damage.

what is the funniest part is that NIST has in their intial draft report the phrasing and implicit statement that the under support was gone.

david chandler just clarified it and supported it.

there is NO support for CD. NOT ONE bit.

[Skeptic121]

We need to remember the concept of "instantaneous acceleration"...NIST has admitted that WTC7 dropped at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds or 25 meters. Let's not fall for a version of the "speeder's fallacy" ...telling the cop "I've been driving an hour and I've gone sixty miles so you can't say I was doing 75!" Wrong. Cops ticket for instantaneous speed, not average speed.

[trutherslie]

And yet again you repeat the truther lie.

I have shown you that NIST said there was no support for the columns which led to the freefall. They even made the statement.

David Chandler did a great job helping to futher explain the collapse, then we batshit crazy with the must be CD hypothesis.

why do you insist on repeating debunked crap, like JSS does?

There is NO evidence of explosives. No video with the sound of explosives detonating right before collapse. not one.

[JSSTyger]

"And yet again you repeat the truther lie.

I have shown you that NIST said there was no support for the columns which led to the freefall. They even made the statement."

No support...I wonder why. I suppose it all spontaneously disappeared

"There is NO evidence of explosives"

I thought reputable scientists found evidence of nano-thermates. They are experts so their findings can be used in court. All NIST did was test for RDX. Congrats...they proved RDX was not used.

[trutherslie]

hahahaha.

reputable scientists? Really? Jones and his crew plus1? really? Honestly? you are going to mention the fully craptacular Bentham Open journal? Really? Hahahaha.

please provide just one academic database which states ANY of the 89 bentahm publications are accepted peer reviewed journals.

I'll wait.

that isnt' counting the massive methodology problems with that paper (like comparing the paint chips found to the BYU paint.. it is nice ot know that BYU stadium won't blow up)

[bweazel]

Tyger. Give up on him. He's a coward. Most of them are. They don't want to live in a world where they would have reason to be scared. They like to continue the, we are safe in America. No pain happens in this world. Our politicians love us. Blah blah blah. They're just cowards. Don't bother asking him why. He won't admit it. None of them ever do.

[trutherslie]

hahahaha... oh poor little truther. I love it when you all make assumptions. I work and live in Ras Al Khaimah in the United Arab Emirates. I am surrounded by muslims who will tell yu UBL did it. hahaha. go back to school boy. apologize to your teachers for wasting their time.

[bweazel]

Here you are again. Being an idiot. Why do you think just because you call something a controlled demolition that is has to sound, look, and be like every controlled demolition you've ever seen. You are way too damn literal, man. CONTROLLED. That is the key word here. No one is calling this a Loud Typical Looking Vegas Style Demolition. We are calling it controlled because we believe someone brought these down. You can also hear the bombs they HAD to use. You just willfully deny it.

[trutherslie]

even more fun. I love busting truthers... it just makes my day.

you say CD. that means CD. so there should be explosives which you can see and hear. CD charges go off and you can hear them for about a mile away. ANY CD charges going off would be easily heard on EVERY video from 9/11... but amazingly there are NONE which happen seconds before the collapses of any of the buildings. why is that?

cd charges are LOUD because they are explosives... not loud because the CD guys want to be loud.

[bweazel]

Busting? Haha. Lose the ego kid. It makes you look even more idiotic than you already do. Really makes me smile when I see some loser laugh at his own jokes.... Over, and over, and over, and over again. You sure do enjoy yourself don't you? ; )

[JSSTyger]

"so there should be explosives which you can see and hear."

I would like an expert opinion on that statement...because I seriously do not believe that all explosives give off the same color and sound. Infact, I know that they don't. Different explosives have different visual effects. Different explosives have different sound levels. The whole premise of your argument is rubbish.

[trutherslie]

You are so right.  different explosives do have different sound levels.

but CD charges are LOUD because they need to compact the explosion in a very precise way, and need to be powerful enough to do it.

WHERE ARE THE SOUNDS OF ANY EXPLOSIVES? Any... any bangs, any booms, any noise at all? You don't have it. None.

I really want to know what you have designed, because I don't want to ever go inside of them...

[bweazel]

Again, there are plenty. You're just being a dick and refusing to acknowledge them.

[ZodiacBryan]

Notice how there's no sound on this video that's because they don't want you to hear the bomb's going off

[Brunte81]

Fear and you can control your people.

[dciduous]

You people are worse than the believers of bigfoot and loch ness. Bunch of idiots! Planes crashed into the WTC so get over your dumb ass conspiracy theories cause it's disrespectful, rude, and plain out fing ignorant.

[saxoniano]

you disrespect all the people who died that day....

do some research...grow up..

the conspiracy is the one you live in today

911 was surely an inside job...

you got no proof of the contrary...

[fafnir242]

And you've go no legit proof of your argument either. None of you do. Anyone who says that 9/11 was an inside job are really the ones who are disrespecting the people who died that day. I dare any of you to say that to one of the victim's family members; that their family members were killed in a government plot.

[saxoniano]

fafnir

be sure that all the families who have lost someone on 911 do have questions about that day and they all deserve an answer. So far 911 has been explained with ONLY 585 pages by the USA Gov. The problem is that 911 is a giant COVER UP....the lie is so big ......

and you got no proof that Al Qaeda did 911 EITHER

[saxoniano]

fafnir

and stop watching cartoons...grow up

[ChrisVistaAssn]

Maybe you should watch 911: Press for Truth, it's about 9/11 family victims, mostly 3 widow's, called the Jersey Girls.

ht tp : // w w w . 911pressfortruth . com

[mitchcrim]

Talk about a violation of logic.

[gerry20009]

this building´s demolition after twin towers falled down, curious? or.. some things to hide inthere?

[Eddiespice509]

that is freaky still.

[amerikanmafia]

so fugazi1999.. lol.. how many steel structures do see just fall outta the sky.. 47stories droppin at free fall speed.. hmmmmm and cus it was on fire for a couple hours? yeah i guess ur right? couldnt be CD.. (not)

so then scientist fugazi.. what made it fall? you must have a degree in knowing everything..lol peace out tubers..

[PottersHouseOz]

I might start a new demolition company, instead of using explosives, I'll just light a few fires and wait for the building to collapse into a nice neat little pile.

It worked for Larry Silverstein!

[AngriestAmerican]

They better start making grills and ovens out of wood now also, cause my neighbors house was engulfed in 30 foot flames, burned for 2 hours and it still stood!!! Wood can out last steel in a fire!!

[weston302]

@PottersHouseOz Wow what the fuck is wrong with you? Thousands of people died that day and your making jokes? Thats wrong go kill urself

[kurij187]

@PottersHouseOz AHHAHAHAH omg way too funny

[datzfast]

Larry pulled the firemen out because the building was lost due to fire. i suppose you feel they should have stayed and died. yes you could have told the children they were safe

[zenoist2]

@datzfast there were no firemen the the buidling was evacuated very early AM ,research it. and anyone else

It was also cordoned off so nobody could get near it.

Taken the building was evacuated and cordoned off what does silverstein mean by pull it?

What do YOU thinki?

[datzfast]

@zenoist2 danger building not safe

[letmeseethat1]

@datzfast Why would Larry have any authority over the fire department? It really doesn't make sense. I asked the firemen to stop dumping water into my house after the fire was out and they wouldn't even do that. So why in the world would they trust the building's lease owner's judgement over their own? Common. Stop believing all the lies that they're selling you. This was a large conspiracy, not the simple one they've fed you. Their story makes almost no sense. lol. Common people.

[lanerant]

@datzfast you think a building with a few small isolated fires, a 47 story building would collapse like that?

get your head checked! and maybe your heart while you're at it!!

[datzfast]

@PottersHouseOz it is contents that burn a building down. good luck on the emptys.

[fugazi1999]

sorry kids!!!! i do not believe this was demolition work....

[originalorol]

i dont believe that u donbt believe

[Illumione]

real, good video.

[PollenB]

Unbelievable how anybody can even consider this not to be a demolition!

[originalorol]

are they blind?:))or just want to be blind?:))

[PollenB]

True. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see!

[WarAgainstIslam]

Thank you for this video

[IZAKDAVID911]

Controlled Demolition for sure.