Added: 3 years ago
From: hackenbollox
Views: 364
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • We don't have a president. Being a theocracy, we have a parliament and ministers. Currently, the prime minister is called Gordon Brown. He used to be the Chancellor, which means he was in charge of financial policies.

    As for your second question, I rarely favour one politician over another. I think that anybody who wants the job should on no account be allowed to do it.

  • (cont)

    I've spent a few weeks having a look at all the news sources except the US ones. They can't be trusted to remain objective. I've also watched video interviews, speeches, debates, etc.

    Conclusion: Sarah Palin is the biggest threat to face the world at the moment. She talks about god's work with that glazed look in her eye. She also can't string together a coherent sentence. Based on recent evidence, that may be a qualification. :)))

  • Great stuff. Absolutely no evidence indeed!

    5 Stars from a a fellow atheist.

  • Jajajajaja! Well,

    I deny the existence of TIME.

    Pretty Simple.

    NO EVIDENCE.

    Bye.

    ^_^

  • Very clever. NOT!

    In fact, time doesn't exist in and of itself, but it forms a part of a four-dimensional entity known as spacetime.

    Go read some Einstein, Einstein.

  • Well, in fact, God does not exist in and of itself, but in parts of many-dimensional entities. Never in the Bibles says God as physical being. You know... people have that concept of God, the-big-guns-upstaris, you know what I am sayin'? I can see the effects of time and also I can see the effects of God that has upon people when they follow him. Now, see the connection Einstein.

  • Evidence? Show me the evidence, man! And I don't mean anecdotal stories of how people behave. Both the anecdotes and the behaviour are easily falsified and, I'm sure, explained without a deity.

  • I ask this: how are you going to apply physical laws to a non-physical being? Why would you?! You want evidence? Show me the evidence of justice, love, time, numbers! Where's the evidence?! These are concepts! And you do not deny their existence! God is a concept. That is what you ought to understand. Just like the concept of "The Face of America" What does that mean? If you go on an airplane and see down, California, Nevada and all of those will form a face?

  • And there's where your argument completely fails. The lack of evidence in itself is compelling. There is no god, that's almost certain.

  • To say there is no evidence it is different to say there is no evidence at all. There are many natural arguments, phylosphiocal or even for that matter, operational if favor for the existence of God or a supernatual being. Now I ask you hackenbollox, do you believe in LOVE? More specifically the CONCEPTUALIZED FORM?

  • I do believe in love, yes. how does that support the existence of god. As I said, no evidence.

  • hackenbollow, what I am trying to get to is that you believe in concepts whereas God it's a concept too. The Bible describes God as love, justice, and other concepts as well. Never and forever try to see God as a man in the sky or somewhere in the Universe, why would you? When people say God is Love it is indeed because God is Love. God is a multi-conceptual being. And that, my friend, is where are you mistaking. I hope this helps you when you talk about God.

  • It won't help. Regardless of how you try to define god, you are still left with a simple problem. Why would I describe love or justice as god when I can simply describe them as love or justice. You simply can't cite the bible as a source for the simple fact that it has no credibility. Still no evidence.

  • I do understand what you said to the fullest degree. Look, I am well aware of the weak points that the Bible has and I am not going to cover them by some bulllshit (I think you liked that) But hackenbollox, what I am upset to see in here is this this fucken Jerry Springer show (Athiest versus Religious people) and you are part of the audience saying "I deny the Holy Spirit" and people will go "Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!" Leave Christians alone. Maybe they piss you for their beliefs (Cont)

  • ...but you know you have a different set of belifs and unlike Theological arguments, when it comes to how to live a good life, in this issue we can prove you wrong or right. You and others attack Christians but why not attack Muslims or Muhammad? Say something about Muahhamad and you might hear or see s different reactions.They will even kill if you offend Muahhamad explicitly.

  • I attack all irrational belief systems. I'm sorry you feel I have singled out your particular delusion, but that is never my intent. When I say there is no god, I mean there is no god. Not just yours, but thor, baal, zeus, poseidon, etc.

  • I think you are contradicting yourself by your video. Yoo said:

    I attack all irrational belief systems. I'm sorry you feel I have singled out your particular delusion, but that is never my intent.

    If that was true, you would then have just said "I deny any God" But you specifically deny the Holy Spirit. C'mon, man, you have to agree that you contradicted yourself. Let us not make any excuses. You are better thn that. Did you or did you not contradicted yourself?

  • No, mate. The reason for my comments in this video is that it was a specific response to a sepcific question. See the video that preceded it and you will see. I deny the existence of any and all gods.

  • Ohhh okay. I am going to have to get my words back. In any case, I'd like to chat with you (take you head on) on a specific subject. I have ssen you have responded to all my comments so I wanna have a debate with you. Seems to me Religion is not your favorite subject (since you refute it with such great joy) Do you like Politics? Who are you voting for?

  • I'm in UK, so I don't get to vote in this one. In my opinion, though, McCain would be a mistake. I'm not completely sold on Obama, but Sarah Palin should never be allowed even the possibility of getting her hands on the nuclear codes. She's one scary bird.

  • Ummm...too bad you are in the U.K. Speaking of which, who's your president over in the U.K.? I do not get to hear much from Western Civilazation. I just want to get a taste of your background and then we could discuss Politics. After this, in a nutshell, why would you vote for Obama?

  • Hey ... you've got *my vote!*

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more