came here out of curiosity about Laplace transforms thinking they were ingenious constructs, and looking for an explanation about where they come from. I got exactly what I wanted. Thanks!
@alquiora He mentions that the function ln(x) can only be a function of negative values of x. When you input a negative value into a natural log function you get a complex number. So the variable IS complex, no trickery here
@alquiora He mentions that the function ln(x) can only be a function of negative values of x. When you input a negative value into a natural log function you get a complex number. So the variable IS complex, no trickery here.
Well put and good to know (a lot simpler than I thought). I still need to find the proof as to why Laplace and inverse Laplace transforms work the way they do (yielding solutions to deqs). Wish he would've covered that here.
Excelente, tomé esta misma clase en la universidad, una linda manera de explciar el origen de la transformada de Laplace............Excelent I took this same lesson at university, it's a wonderful way of describing the origin of Laplace's transform ........Yes, mexicans as myself know math of this level.
very interesting, i didn't know the way they derived the laplace transform. As an Engineering Student, i just apply the transform without knowing the origin.
Not only the lecturing is great but the idea of the introducing the concept of Laplace transform from its origin is the greatest which, on the one hand, makes the theory far more interesting in terms of the relationship between mathematical analysis and differential equations, on the other hand, it explains the deep connection between a discrete phenomenon and its continuous counterpart. In conclusion, it is just amazing.
It will depend on your level of education before college. If you took multivariable calculus at a university level in high school, you may have this class in your first semester at university.
I don't know if MIT has a mathematical "sequence" for majors involving mathematics that is "mandatory" though.
Differential equations is what made physics "come alive" for me.
for me! this is not a correct explanation.How is he relating S with -Logx
S is intact a complex number S=A+jB
tsyedtayyabshah 1 day ago
this guy is badass.
TheBeardedThinker 6 days ago
Wiadomo skąd to "s" się bierze, przynajmniej nie z dupy...
longerob 3 weeks ago
most teachers just copy whats written in textbooks to the board. but teachers like these do the actual teaching. this is how it's done.
ozzyv 1 month ago
soso is ja cool
UnAlesharl576 2 months ago
such a great explanation! love this!
TashaM0901 2 months ago
amazing explanation!
asddgfzg 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thank you for sharing!
potpie921 3 months ago
came here out of curiosity about Laplace transforms thinking they were ingenious constructs, and looking for an explanation about where they come from. I got exactly what I wanted. Thanks!
jads92 4 months ago
O, Is that all???
9906197439 4 months ago
Thank you so much it's very helpful!!!
BisratGabriel 4 months ago
Comment removed
alquiora 6 months ago
Comment removed
MatrixOfDynamism 7 months ago
@MatrixOfDynamism
read the video description
hamsterpoop 6 months ago
excellent explanation
asyd03 10 months ago
Comment removed
asyd03 10 months ago
@alquiora He mentions that the function ln(x) can only be a function of negative values of x. When you input a negative value into a natural log function you get a complex number. So the variable IS complex, no trickery here
ryanmonte 11 months ago
My prof never explained where this thing came from when I took 2nd year ODE. This explains a lot :)
angryparrot 11 months ago
Good explanation
MrFrankco1 1 year ago
i see what you did there
YellowCakeKid 1 year ago
I wanna go to MIT sooo bad :(
kyle3420 1 year ago
good handwriting
grahamwebb2000 1 year ago
Most of the texts define s as a complex variable but in this lecture he defines s as ln(x) .... which one is right? Is he just tricking the students?
alquiora 1 year ago
@alquiora He mentions that the function ln(x) can only be a function of negative values of x. When you input a negative value into a natural log function you get a complex number. So the variable IS complex, no trickery here.
ryanmonte 11 months ago
@ryanmonte I must have missed it
alquiora 11 months ago
Comment removed
ryanmonte 11 months ago
Well put and good to know (a lot simpler than I thought). I still need to find the proof as to why Laplace and inverse Laplace transforms work the way they do (yielding solutions to deqs). Wish he would've covered that here.
weezilla 1 year ago
Excelente, tomé esta misma clase en la universidad, una linda manera de explciar el origen de la transformada de Laplace............Excelent I took this same lesson at university, it's a wonderful way of describing the origin of Laplace's transform ........Yes, mexicans as myself know math of this level.
adriancho07070707 1 year ago
nice. had to replay like a million times to understand. but gr8!! i know laplace transform's origin now!!
azmathmoosa 1 year ago
An excellent explanation. However, he fails to explain why 's' must be a complex number in order for L(s) to qualify as a laplace transform.
k9triz 1 year ago
@k9triz I thought s was just a dummy real variable to be used for transforms. I've never worked with it complex, what do you mean?
weezilla 1 year ago
MIT?? holly crap better put attention
axedrecista 1 year ago
my mind has been blown by this great description.
Chubigans 1 year ago
Much better than the explanation i got in my college. Like X 10000
lbocvarov89 1 year ago
Oh, is that all?
=DD
IanFarias00 2 years ago 2
really nice! once more the discrete plays along with the continuous!
yanmich 2 years ago
very interesting, i didn't know the way they derived the laplace transform. As an Engineering Student, i just apply the transform without knowing the origin.
tarmizi2005 2 years ago 25
Not only the lecturing is great but the idea of the introducing the concept of Laplace transform from its origin is the greatest which, on the one hand, makes the theory far more interesting in terms of the relationship between mathematical analysis and differential equations, on the other hand, it explains the deep connection between a discrete phenomenon and its continuous counterpart. In conclusion, it is just amazing.
F. A. I
MsIzadi 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
xjkgx 2 years ago 2
Phenomenal! Most interesting. Most insightfull explanation of how Laplace (and other) transform(s) works.
It helped me appreciate Fourier transform like never before.
anandparalkar 2 years ago 18
That's why MIT is MIT.
znhait 3 years ago 3
wow, when do they learn it at MIT???
lagolfa123 3 years ago
It will depend on your level of education before college. If you took multivariable calculus at a university level in high school, you may have this class in your first semester at university.
I don't know if MIT has a mathematical "sequence" for majors involving mathematics that is "mandatory" though.
Differential equations is what made physics "come alive" for me.
troponinnutrition 3 years ago 2
nice video i was also wondering the other day where it came from and now i know
djwilliamt 3 years ago 4
gracias a la persona que publico este gran video me ayudo mucho ya que no habia podido encontrar una demostracion tan formal.
z
luliyo94 3 years ago 3
La persona que publico esto se llama MIT y es la mejor escuela del mundo
jeje saludos
dzalf 3 years ago 4